Lymph Nodes

Published on 02/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Internal Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1612 times

Chapter 18 Lymph Nodes

A. General Considerations

Lymph nodes are important. A methodical search may yield invaluable clues in cancer or systemic disease. Some “sentinel” nodes have even entered medical folklore, forever linked by eponyms to the physicians who first described them.

8 What is the differential diagnosis of a generalizedadenopathy?

One of three processes: (1) a disseminated malignancy, especially hematologic (lymphomas, leukemias, and angioimmunoblastic lymphadenopathy); (2) a collagen vascular disorder (sarcoidosis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE]); or (3) an infectious process (mononucleosis, cytomegalovirus [CMV], AIDS, toxoplasmosis, syphilis, tuberculosis, histoplasmosis, coccidioidomycosis, brucellosis, and bubonic plague). Drug reaction can do it, too, and so can intravenous abuse. Some medications (e.g., phenytoin) specifically cause lymphadenopathy; others (e.g., cephalosporins, penicillins, or sulfonamides) do it instead in the context of a serum sickness-like syndrome, with fever, arthralgias, and skin rash (see Table 18-1).

Table 18-1 Medications That May Cause Lymphadenopathy

Allopurinol (Zyloprim) Penicillin
Atenolol (Tenormin) Phenytoin (Dilantin)
Captopril (Capozide) Primidone (Mysoline)
Carbamazepine (Tegretol) Pyrimethamine (Daraprim)
Cephalosporins Quinidine
Gold Sulfonamides
Hydralazine (Apresoline) Sulindac (Clinoril)

(Adapted from Ferrer R: Lymphadenopathy. Am Fam Physician 58:1313–1323, 1998.)

12 Should one know the regions drained by the various lymphonodal stations?

Yes, since this may unlock the underlying cause. After detecting an enlarged node, always examine the region drained by it (see Table 18-2). Look for infections, skin lesions, or tumors.

Table 18-2 Lymph Node Groups: Location, Lymphatic Drainage and Selected Differential Diagnosis*

Location Lymphatic Drainage Causes
Submental Lower lip, anterior floor of mouth, tip of tongue, skin of cheek, teeth, nose Mononucleosis-like syndromes, Epstein-Barr virus, CMV, toxoplasmosis
Submandibular Tongue, submaxillary gland, lips and mouth, conjunctivae Infections of head, neck, sinuses, ears, eyes, scalp, pharynx
Anterior cervical (jugular) Tongue, tonsil, pinna, parotid, larynx, thryroid, upper esophagus Pharyngitis organisms, rubella, upper respiratory infections, cancer of tongue, larynx, thyroid and cervical esophagus
Posterior cervical Scalp and neck, middle ear, skin of arms and pectorals, thorax, cervical and axillary nodes Mononucleosis, toxoplasmosis, tuberculosis, rubella, otitis media, scalp infections and dandruff, Kikuchi’s disease, lymphoma, head and neck malignancy
Preauricular Eyelids and conjunctivae, temporal region, pinna Disease external auditory canal, ipsilateral conjunctivitis (Parinaud’s syndrome), lymphoma
Postauricular External auditory meatus, pinna, scalp Local infection, but also rubella
Occipital Scalp and head Local infection
Right supraclavicular node Breast, lungs, esophagus mediastinum, Lung, breast, mediastinum
Left supraclavicular node Breast, lungs, abdomen via thoracic duct, and pelvis Lymphoma, thoracic, retroperitoneal, gastrointestinal or pelvic cancer, bacterial or fungal infection
Axillary Arm, thoracic wall, breast Arm infections, cat-scratch disease, tularemia, lymphoma, breast cancer, silicone implants, brucellosis, melanoma
Epitrochlear Ulnar aspect of forearm and hand Infections, lymphoma, sarcoidosis and connective tissue diseases, tularemia, secondary syphilis, leprosy, leishmaniasis, rubella
Inguinal Penis, scrotum, vulva, vagina, perineum, gluteal region, lower abdominal wall, lower anal canal, extremities (benign reactive in shoeless walkers) Infections of the leg or foot, STDs (e.g., herpes simplex virus, gonococcal infection, syphilis, chancroid, granuloma inguinale, lymphogranuloma venereum), lymphoma, pelvic malignancy, bubonic plague

STDs = sexually transmitted diseases.

* Modified from Ferrer R: Lymphadenopathy. Am Fam Physician 58:1313–1323, 1998.

15 What about associated signs and symptoms?

They can be “local” or systemic (Table 18-4). Local findings suggest infection or neoplasm in a specific site (like the swollen nodes and lymphangitic streaks of a skin infection). Conversely, systemic symptoms (such as fever, fatigue, night sweats, and unexplained weight loss) argue in favor of a collagen vascular, lymphoproliferative, or infectious disorder (e.g., tuberculosis [TB]). Still, lack of associated signs or symptoms does not exclude malignancy and thus should not stop a work-up. Finally, remember that the adenopathy of Hodgkin’s disease may become painful after alcohol ingestion.

Table 18-4 Lymphadenopathy—Associated Signs and Symptoms

Disorder Associated Findings
Common Causes of Lymphadenopathy
Mononucleosis-type syndromes Fatigue, malaise, fever, atypical lymphocytosis
Epstein-Barr virus* Splenomegaly in 50%
Toxoplasmosis* 80–90% asymptomatic
Cytomegalovirus* Often mild symptoms; patients may have hepatitis
Initial stages of HIV infection* “Flu-like” illness, rash
Cat-scratch disease Fever in 30%; cervical or axillary nodes
Pharyngitis (group A Streptococcus, gonococcus) Fever, pharyngeal exudates, cervical nodes
Tuberculosis lymphadenitis* Painless, matted cervical nodes
Secondary syphilis* Rash
Hepatitis B* Fever, nausea, vomiting, icterus
Lymphogranuloma venereum Tender, matted inguinal nodes
Chancroid Painful ulcer, painful inguinal nodes
Lupus erythematosus* Arthritis, rash, serositis; renal, neurologic, hematologic disorders
Rheumatoid arthritis* Arthritis
Lymphoma* Fever, night sweats, weight loss in 20–30%
Leukemia* Blood dyscrasias, bruising
Serum sickness* Fever, malaise, arthralgia, urticaria; exposure to antisera or medications
Sarcoidosis Hilar nodes, skin lesions, dyspnea
Kawasaki disease* Fever, conjunctivitis, rash, mucosal lesions
Less Common Causes of Lymphadenopathy
Lyme disease* Rash, arthritis
Measles* Fever, conjunctivitis, rash, cough
Rubella* Rash
Tularemia* Fever, ulcer at inoculation site
Brucellosis* Fever, sweats, malaise
Plague Febrile, acutely ill with cluster of tender nodes
Typhoid fever* Fever, chills, headache, abdominal complaints
Still’s disease* Fever, rash, arthritis
Dermatomyositis* Proximal weakness, skin changes
Amyloidosis* Fatigue, weight loss

* Causes of generalized lymphadenopathy.

(Adapted from Ferrer R: Lymphadenopathy. Am Fam Physician 58:1313–1323, 1998.)

18 Are there any epidemiologic clues that might narrow the differential diagnosis?

Yes. Occupational exposure, recent travel, or high-risk behavior may all contribute (Table 18-5).

Table 18-5 Epidemiologic Clues to the Diagnosis of Lymphadenopathy

Exposure Diagnosis
General  
Cat Cat-scratch disease, toxoplasmosis
Undercooked meat Toxoplasmosis
Tick bite Lyme disease, tularemia
Tuberculosis Tuberculous adenitis
Recent blood transfusion or transplant Cytomegalovirus, HIV
High-risk sexual behavior HIV, syphilis, herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus, hepatitis B infection
Intravenous drug use HIV, endocarditis, hepatitis B infection
Occupational  
Hunters, trappers Tularemia
Fishermen, fishmongers, slaughterhouse workers Erysipeloid
Travel-related  
Arizona, southern California, New Mexico, western Texas Coccidioidomycosis
Southwestern United States Bubonic plague
Southeastern or central United States Histoplasmosis
Southeast Asia, India, Central or West Africa Scrub typhus
Central or West Africa African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness)
Central or South America American trypanosomiasis (Chagas’ disease)
East Africa, Mediterranean, China, Latin America Kala-azar (leishmaniasis)
Mexico, Peru, Chile, India, Pakistan, Egypt, Indonesia Typhoid fever

HIV = human immunodeficiency virus.

(Adapted from Ferrer R: Lymphadenopathy. Am Fam Physician 58:1313–1323, 1998.)

19 Which node characteristics can be clinically helpful?

In addition to location, six features may help the diagnosis:

image Size: This is easily measured by a plastic caliper or ruler. It can predict its nature and guide biopsy. Although there is no “normal” size (since this depends on age and background antigenic exposure), some authors have defined the upper limits of normal as a node >1   cm that has been present outside the inguinal region for more than 1 month. Yet, inguinal nodes can be normal up to 1.5   cm, whereas preauricular and epitrochlear nodes are suspicious even if 0.5–1   cm. Moreover, large but benign nodes are quite common in IV drug users. In fact, some authors have even suggested raising the threshold of suspicion to 1.5 × 1.5   cm. Finally, although no specific diagnosis can be based on size, some valuable predictions can be inferred. For example, in 213 adults with unexplained lymphadenopathy, nodes <1   cm were never neoplastic. Conversely, cancer was the final diagnosis in 8% of 1–1.5   cm nodes and 38% of >1.5   cm. In children, nodes >2   cm (along with an abnormal chest x-ray and absence of ear, nose, and throat symptoms) argue in favor of granulomatous diseases (TB, cat-scratch disease, sarcoid) or cancer (mostly lymphomas).

image Duration: The longer the node has been present, the less its risk of being neoplastic or granulomatous. Still, lymphomatous nodes can regress, albeit temporarily.

image Consistency: Soft nodes are usually infectious or inflammatory, whereas rock-hard ones tend to be neoplastic, often metastatic. Exceptions include the nodes of Hodgkin’s, which are firm but rubbery. Fluctuant nodes reflect instead bacterial lymphadenitis with necrosis. They feel like a tense balloon or grape, are typically tender, and may even fistulize through the skin, forming open sinuses that are a common feature in TB. Nodes of this type, especially in groins or axillae, are often referred to as buboes (from the Greek term for swollen groin) and used to be typical of infectious processes, such as gonorrhea, syphilis, TB, and, of course, the “bubonic” plague of old.

image Matting: Fusion into a scalloped mass transforms individual nodes into large conglomerates. This is usually a neoplastic feature (metastatic carcinoma or lymphomas), but also can occur in inflammatory processes (like sarcoid) and chronic infections (like TB and lymphogranuloma venereum).

image Relationship to surrounding tissues: Adherence to overlying skin, subjacent tissues, or both does not separate inflammation from neoplasm but does exclude benignity.

image Pain/tenderness: This reflects rapid growth with painful capsular stretching. It is a sign of suppurative inflammation but also may reflect hemorrhage into the necrotic center of a rapidly expanding neoplastic node. Hence, tenderness does not reliably differentiate benign from malignant ones. The same applies to sinus tract formation, which can occur in infections (actinomycosis and TB) as well as cancer.

Pearl. Benign nodes tend to be small, soft, nontender, mobile, and discrete (well demarcated). Neoplastic nodes are large, nontender, matted, fixed, and rock-hard. Inflammatory nodes are tender, firm (but not rock-hard), occasionally fluctuant, and often matted and fixed.

22 What is the differential diagnosis of an unexplained lymphadenopathy?

Usually infectious, neoplastic, or autoimmune—which also is the differential diagnosis for fever of unknown origin or an elevated sedimentation rate. A helpful mnemonic is CHICAGO:

image C = Cancers: hematologic malignancies (Hodgkin’s disease, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, acute and chronic leukemia, Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, multiple myeloma [uncommon], systemic mastocytosis) and metastatic “solid” tumors (breast, lung, renal cell, prostate, other)

image H = Hypersensitivity syndromes: serum sickness, drug sensitivity (diphenylhydantoin, carbamazepine, primidone, gold, allopurinol, indomethacin, sulfonamides, others), silicone reaction, vaccination-related, and graft versus host disease

image I = Infections: viral (infectious mononucleosis [Epstein-Barr virus], cytomegalovirus, infectious hepatitis, postvaccinal lymphadenitis, adenovirus, herpes zoster, HIV/AIDS, human T-lymphocyte virus 1), bacterial (cutaneous infections [staphylococci, streptococci], cat-scratch fever, chancroid, melioidosis, TB, atypical mycobacteria, primary and secondary syphilis), chlamydial (lymphogranuloma venereum), protozoan (toxoplasmosis), mycotic (histoplasmosis, coccidioidomycosis), rickettsial (scrub typhus), helminthic (filariasis)

image C = Connective tissue disorders: rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, mixed connective tissue disease, Sjögren syndrome

image A = Atypical lymphoproliferative disorders: angiofollicular (giant) lymph node hyperplasia (Castleman disease), angioimmunoblastic lymphadenopathy with dysproteinemia, angiocentric immunoproliferative disorders, lymphomatoid granulomatosis, Wegener granulomatosis

image G = Granulomatous lesions: TB, histoplasmosis, mycobacterial infections, cryptococci, silicosis, berylliosis, cat-scratch fever

image O = Other unusual causes of lymphadenopathy: inflammatory pseudotumor of lymph nodes, histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis (Kikuchi lymphadenitis), sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease), vascular transformation of sinuses, progressive transformation of germinal centers

B. Cervical and Supraclavicular Nodes

25 What are the important head and neck stations?

There is a fair amount of variability and overlap in pathways of drainage (Fig. 18-1). Overall, you should examine nodes in the following order:

image Submental: Just below the chin. They drain the teeth and intra-oral cavity.

image Submandibular: Along the underside of the jaw, on either side. They drain the structures in the posterior floor of the mouth.

image Anterior cervical (both superficial and deep): Also called “jugular chain nodes,” these lie on top of and beneath the sternocleidomastoid muscles (SCM) on either side of the neck, from the angle of the jaw to the top of the clavicle (the SCMs allow the head to rotate to the opposite side and can be easily identified by asking the patient to turn the head). They drain the internal structures of the throat as well as part of the posterior pharynx, tonsils, and thyroid gland.

image Posterior cervical: Also called “posterior triangle nodes,” these extend in a line posterior to the SCMs, but in front of the trapezius, from the mastoid bone to the clavicle. They drain the skin on the back of the head and are frequently enlarged during upper respiratory infections (mononucleosis).

image Tonsillar: Just below the angle of the mandible. They drain the tonsillar and posterior pharyngeal regions.

image Preauricular and postauricular: Respectively, anterior and posterior to the ear. Swelling of the pre-auricular node in a setting of conjunctivitis-like “pink eye” represents Parinaud’s (oculoglandular) syndrome, occurring in various conditions, including Tularemia and Catscratch disease (Bartonellosis).

image Occipital:Common in childhood infections, but rare in adults—except in a setting of either banal scalp infection or, more ominously, generalized lymphadenopathy from systemic disease (HIV).

image Supraclavicular: In the hollow above the clavicle, just lateral to where it joins the sternum. They drain part of the thoracic cavity and abdomen (see questions 3136).

image

Figure 18-1 Lymph nodes and lymphatic drainage system of the head and neck.

(From Seidel HM, Ball JW, Dains JE, Benedict GW: Mosby’s Guide to Physical Examination, 3rd ed. St. Louis, Mosby, 1995.)

Palpation of other cervical groups also may be indicated in cases of disease affecting specific regions. For example, preauricular and postauricular nodes (just in front or behind the ears) may enlarge because of infections of the external ear canal.

30 What are Delphian nodes?

A cluster of small and midline prelaryngeal nodes (Fig. 18-2). These are typically located on the thyrohyoid membrane—just anterior to the cricothyroid ligament, and just above the thyroid isthmus. Given their pretracheal and superficial location, they are easily palpable if enlarged, even though at times they may be confused with the pyramidal lobe of the gland. They drain the thyroid and larynx, and like Delphi in ancient Greece, they have traditionally been considered an oracle—of thyroid disease or laryngeal malignancy (even though objective supportive data are lacking). They also are the first to be exposed during surgery, thus foretelling the nature of the underlying illness. Delphian nodes reflect a range of thyroid involvement, including subacute thyroiditis, Hashimoto’s, and thyroid cancer. If due to laryngeal carcinoma, they give the disease a more ominous connotation.

35 Who was Virchow?

Rudolf Ludwig Karl Virchow (1821–1902) was a graduate of the Friedrich-Wilhelm Institute for Army Doctors in Berlin, which he joined after realizing that his voice was not strong enough to support a career as a preacher. Preaching, however, remained one of his lifelong interests. In fact, after multiple rejections by various journal editors, he founded his own journal, which became known as Virchow’s Archiv, earning its pontificating editor the nickname “The Pope.” Virchow’s contributions to medicine were nonetheless staggering: he was the first to describe (and name) leukemia and understand thrombosis (see Virchow’s triad). He also was the first to recognize cerebral and pulmonary embolism (named that too) and the nature of arterial plugs in malignant endocarditis. He discovered amyloid, myelin, and neuroglia and contributed scores of papers to the understanding of cerebral hemorrhage, meningitis, and various congenital anomalies of the nervous system. By contrast, he had little interest in the emerging germ theory of disease and deeply detested evolution, which he tried to ban from school curricula. Although academically autocratic and reactionary, Virchow was politically very liberal—in fact, almost socialistic. He even helped construct some of the barricades during the 1848 Berlin uprising, a feat that cost him his job. Later, he became an outspoken opponent of Bismarck, who went so far as to challenge him to a duel in 1865 (Virchow agreed but on one condition: that the duel be fought with scalpels). In fact, he never missed a chance to strongly castigate the social injustice and poor hygienic conditions of his time, which he considered responsible for the frequent and recurrent epidemics. In a report to the government that became almost a political indictment of the industrial revolution, he asked, “Shall the triumph of human genius lead to nothing more than to make the human race miserable?” Still, he didn’t limit himself to cursing the darkness, but also lit a few candles—such as securing a good sewerage system and water supply for Berlin. His extracurricular interests included anthropology, medical history, and, above all, archeology. He even accompanied his friend Dr. Heinrich Schliemann to Troy in 1859 (writing an account of his famous discoveries) and concocted the idea of x-raying mummies. When he finally died at 81 from complications of a hip fracture sustained while leaping from a moving tram, it was said that Germany had lost in one single man her leading pathologist, sanitarian, anthropologist, and activist.

C. Upper Extremity Nodes

37 What is the best way to search for axillary nodes?

For the left axilla, grasp the patient’s left wrist or elbow with your left hand, and lift the arm up and out laterally. Then use the tip of your right fingers to palpate deep into the axillary fossa and roof. Do this first with the patient’s arm gently relaxed and passively abducted from the chest wall. Then repeat it with the arm passively and gently adducted. Examine the right axilla in a similar fashion, albeit with a reversed hand positioning. This technique allows the patient’s arm to remain completely relaxed, thus minimizing any tension in the surrounding tissues that could otherwise mask enlarged lymph nodes. It also is easy to carry out on the supine patient, very much as it would be if it were linked with the female breast exam (Fig 18-3).

image

Figure 18-3 Lymph nodes in the axilla.

(From DeGowin RL: DeGowin and DeGowin’s Diagnostic Examination, 6th ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1994, with permission.)

An alternative technique allows simultaneous examination of both axillae. To do so, ask the patient to lift both arms away from the chest. Then extend the fingers of both your hands and gently direct them toward the apices of the armpits. If you don’t want to place your fingers in direct contact with the axilla, you can do this through the patient’s gown. Now press your hands toward the patient’s body, and move them slowly down the lateral chest wall. This allows you to explore the axillary regions in their entirety.

D. Lower Extremity Nodes

E. Abdominal Nodes

Selected Bibliography

1 Allhiser JN, McKnight TA, McKnight TA, Shank JC, et al. Lymphadenopathy in a family practice. J Fam Pract. 1981;12:27-32.

2 Benson JR, Singh S, Thomas JM. Sister Joseph’s nodule: A case report and review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1997;23:451-454.

3 Crook LD, Tempest B. Plague: A clinical review of 27 cases. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1253-1256.

4 Dawson PJ, Cooper RA, Rambo ON. Diagnosis of malignant lymphoma: A clinicopathological analysis of 158 different lymph node biopsies. Cancer. 1964;17:1405-1413.

5 De Vriese AS, Philippe J, Van Renterghem, DM, et al. Carbamazepine hypersensitivity syndrome: Report of 4 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 1995;74:144-151.

6 Ferrer R. Lymphadenopathy. Am Fam Physician. 1998;58:1313-1323.

7 Fessas P, Pangalis G. Non-malignant lymphadenopathies: Reactive non-specific and reactive specific. In: Pangalis GA, Polliack A, editors. Benign and Malignant Lymphadenopathies: Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1993:31-45.

8 Fijten GH, Blijham GH. Unexplained lymphadenopathy in family practice. An evaluation of the probability of malignant causes and the effectiveness of physicians’ work-up. J Fam Pract. 1988;27:373-376.

9 Habermann TM, Steensma DP. Mayo Clinic Proc. 2000;75:723-732.

10 Hartsock RJ, Halling LW, King FM. Luetic lymphadenitis: A clinical and histologic study of 20 cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 1970;53:304-314.

11 Hartsock RJ. Postvaccinial lymphadenitis: Hyperplasia of lymphoid tissue that simulates malignant lymphomas. Cancer. 1968;21:632-649.

12 Sapira JD: The Art and Science of Bedside Diagnosis: Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins. ed 1. 1990