Chapter 70 Liver and Heart Transplantation
Liver transplantation
2 What are the reasons for liver transplantation?
Overall, the etiology of chronic liver disease can be classified as follows:
Noncholestatic cirrhosis: Alcohol; hepatitis A, B, C, D; cryptogenic; autoimmune.
Cholestatic cirrhosis: Primary biliary cirrhosis, secondary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Metabolic disease: Wilson disease, hemochromatosis, primary oxalosis, glycogen storage disease, α1-antitrypsin deficiency, tyrosinemia, homozygous hyperlipidemia.
Malignant neoplasm: The single most common neoplasm presenting for liver transplantation is hepatocellular carcinoma. Eligibility for transplantation is most commonly based on tumor burden as defined by the Milan or University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) criteria. Cholangiocarcinoma, hepatoblastoma, and hemangiosarcoma are all very rare indications for transplantation.
Miscellaneous: Biliary atresia (in children most common indication), cystic fibrosis, polycystic liver disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome, neonatal hepatitis.
Acute hepatic necrosis: Etiology unknown, drug induced, acute hepatitis, environmental exposure (i.e., Amanita phalloides mushrooms).
4 What is the patient pathophysiology before liver transplantation?
Central nervous system: Hepatic encephalopathy (grade I-IV in chronic and acute-on-chronic disease) and elevated ICP in acute hepatic failure.
Cardiac system: Hyperdynamic circulation with high cardiac output and low systemic vascular resistance. This may be blunted in patients receiving nonselective β-blockade for secondary prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding; cirrhotic cardiomyopathy.


Gastrointestinal system: Portal hypertension with possible upper gastrointestinal bleeding, (refractory) ascites.
Hematologic system: Anemia, thrombocytopenia (mainly sequestration into the spleen), prolonged prothrombin time–partial thromboplastin time, and decreased fibrinogen. Hypercoagulability (especially in patients with malignant disease).
Renal system: Hepatorenal syndrome type I or II, acute kidney injury.
Miscellaneous: Significant electrolyte disturbances (sodium, potassium, glucose), immunosuppression with increased risk for infection, malnutrition.
7 Does every patient receiving a liver transplant need to continue to have an endotracheal tube in place and be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after surgery?
8 How do you manage the liver transplant patient in the immediate postoperative period?
Hypocoagulable or hypercoagulable states: Overall, treatment should be dictated by clinical evidence of bleeding (i.e., drain output, drop in hematocrit). Occasionally, patients require postoperative FFP therapy to offset an initially slow graft function. Platelets may be needed with persistent low platelet counts and evidence of diffuse bleeding. With the exception of a confirmed rapidly dropping hematocrit requiring red blood cell transfusion, transfusion of FFP, platelets, and cryoprecipitate should not be based on laboratory values alone. The threshold for reexploration should be low in the setting of persistent hematocrit drops. Leakage from vascular anastomosis sites and small arterial or venous bleeding should always be considered.
Renal function: Renal dysfunction is frequently present before surgery, and acute kidney injury can develop during the immediate postoperative period. This can be due to temporary renal outflow obstruction during surgery when the inferior vena cava is entirely clamped for insertion of the donor liver. Significant hemodynamic instability requiring large doses of vasopressors and blood loss can contribute to postoperative acute kidney injury. Intraoperative venovenous bypass may ameliorate the outflow obstruction but is not used at most centers. More commonly a piggyback technique is used with preservation of the inferior vena cava. Postoperative supportive therapy of renal function follows ICU standard protocols. In some cases, continuous renal replacement therapy (continuous venovenous hemofiltration) through the immediate postoperative period will help with recovery of renal function.
Glucose and electrolytes: With adequate postoperative liver function and steroid administration, patients tend to have hyperglycemia, which may warrant a continuous insulin infusion. In most cases, the infusion can be tapered off within the first 24 to 48 hours. Depending on the renal function and diuretic or insulin therapy, potassium can be either high or low. If necessary, sodium levels should be corrected cautiously and according to implemented protocols. Calcium homeostasis is not significantly altered in the postoperative period.
Immunosuppression: Allograft rejection can occur at any given point after surgery and is classified as hyperacute, acute, and chronic. Immunosuppressive therapy is usually started immediately after surgery. Commonly used drugs, often in combination, are cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. These agents can cause a variety of side effects, including undesired drug interactions, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and osteoporosis.
Infection: After transplantation, recipients are at a significant risk for bacterial, fungal, and viral infections. Infections in this patient population have increased morbidity and mortality and unique infectious risks compared with immunocompetent ICU patients.
Heart transplantation
10 What are the reasons for heart transplantation?
Dilated cardiomyopathy: viral, idiopathic, post partum, familial, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), myocarditis, ischemic
Restricted cardiomyopathy: sarcoidosis, amyloidosis, endocardial fibrosis, idiopathic, secondary radiation, chemotherapy
Retransplantation or graft failure: primary failure, hyperacute, acute, chronic rejection, nonspecific, restrictive-constrictive, accelerated allograft coronary artery disease
Other: congenital disease, valvular disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
14 How do you manage the heart transplant patient in the immediate postoperative period?
Preload dependence: As mentioned, patients are very preload dependent because of cardiac denervation. This renders them sensitive to positive pressure ventilation, bleeding or tamponade, and pneumothorax.
Increased PVR or right ventricular failure: Although fixed pulmonary hypertension will have been excluded before surgery, postoperative increased PVR may still develop. If severe and untreated, it can lead to right ventricular failure in the newly grafted heart. Management of increased PVR includes inhaled vasodilators such as prostacyclin and nitric oxide. Intravenous vasodilators such as nitroglycerin and nitroprusside are also options. Unfortunately, intravenous vasodilators are associated with systemic hypotension, and their use may require an additional α-agonist infusion. Right ventricular dysfunction can also be treated with atrial pacing, β-adrenergic agonists, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. If these measures are ineffective, right ventricular assist devices or ECMO may be required.
Cardiac arrhythmias: In addition to bradycardia and heart block, atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias are also quite common after heart transplantation. Atrial arrhythmias may be associated with allograft rejection.
Rejection or graft failure: Allograft rejection can occur at any given point after surgery and is classified as hyperacute, acute, and chronic. Diagnosis of cellular rejection of the transplanted heart relies mainly on endomyocardial biopsy particularly in view of vague clinical symptoms and no reliable serologic markers. Serial biopsies are performed after surgery to detect any sign of rejection. Antibody-mediated rejection is difficult to diagnose; it is usually detected by the rising titer of donor-specific antibodies, when other causes have been excluded.
Immunosuppression: Patients usually start immunosuppressive therapy immediately after surgery. Common drugs, often used in combination, are calcineurin inhibitors (such as cyclosporine, tacrolimus), cell cycle inhibitors (such as mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine), and steroids. These agents can cause a variety of side effects, as well as drug interactions (see Table 70-1).
Azathioprine | Myelosuppression |
---|---|
Cyclosporine | Hypertension, ↓renal function, ↑K+, ↓Mg++, ↓seizure threshold |
Mycophenolate mofetil | Myelosuppression, gastrointestinal bleeding |
Prednisone | Hypertension, ↑Glu, adrenal suppression |
Tacrolimus | ↓Renal function, ↓seizure threshold, ↑Glu, ↑K+, ↓Mg++ |
Glu, Glucose.
15 How will the denervated heart respond to medications after transplantation?
Indirect cardiac agents: Drugs, such as ephedrine and atropine, are mediated via the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system. These drugs will have minimal effects. Digitalis will also have no effect on atrioventricular nodal conduction but retains its direct inotropic effect.
Direct cardiac agents: β-Adrenergic agents (isoproterenol, epinephrine, dobutamine, dopamine, norepinephrine) are unaffected and will improve both chronotropy and inotropy. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors (amrinone, milrinone) are also unaffected and improve cardiac output, as well as cause vasodilation.
Vasodilators: Nitrates are unaffected and cause both venous and arterial vasodilation. However, because of the denervation, reflex tachycardia is severely depressed.
Vasoconstrictors: Phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and vasopressin are still effective, but less reflex bradycardia is seen.
β-Blockers and calcium channel blockers: These agents retain the ability to decrease heart rate and blood pressure.
1 Ardehali A., Hughes K., Sadeghi A., et al. Inhaled nitric oxide for pulmonary hypertension after heart transplantation. Transplantation. 2001;72:638–641.
2 Ashary N., Kaye A.D., Hegazi A.R., et al. Anesthetic considerations in the patient with a heart transplant. Heart Dis. 2002;4:191–198.
3 Augoustides J.G., Riha H. Recent progress in heart failure treatment and heart transplantation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23:738–748.
4 Findlay J.Y., Fix O.K., Paugam-Burtz C., et al. Critical care of the end-stage liver disease patient awaiting liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2011;17:496–510.
5 Hlava N., Niemann C.U., Gropper M.A., et al. Postoperative infectious complications of abdominal solid organ transplantation. J Intensive Care Med. 2009;24:3–17.
6 Kamath P.S., Kim W.R. Advanced Liver Disease Study Group. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). Hepatology. 2007;45:797–805.
7 Khush K.K., Valantine H.A. New developments in immunosuppressive therapy for heart transplantation. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2009;14:1–21.
8 Luckraz H., Goddard M., Charman S.C., et al. Early mortality after cardiac transplantation: should we do better? J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005;24:401–405.
9 Mehra M.R., Kobashigawa J., Starling R., et al. Listing criteria for heart transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines for the care of cardiac transplant candidates. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006;25:1024–1042.
10 Miniati D.N., Robbins R.C. Heart transplantation: a thirty-year perspective. Annu Rev Med. 2002;53:189–205.
11 Morgan J.A., Edwards N.M. Orthotopic cardiac transplantation: comparison of outcome using biatrial, bicaval, and total techniques. J Card Surg. 2005;20:102–106.
12 Razonable R.R., Findlay J.Y., O’Riordan A., et al. Critical care issues in patients after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2011;17:511–527.
13 Stehlik J., Edwards L.B., Kucheryavaya A.Y., et al. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-seventh official adult heart transplant report—2010. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010;29:1089–1103.
14 Stobierska-Dzierzek B., Awad H., Michler R.E. The evolving management of acute right-sided heart failure in cardiac transplant recipients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:923–931.
15 Weiss E.S., Nwakanma L.U., Patel N.D., et al. Outcomes in patients older than 60 years of age undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation: an analysis of the UNOS database. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008;27:184–191.
16 Yost S.C., Niemann C.U. Organ transplantation. In: Miller R.D., ed. Miller’s Anesthesia. 7th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2009:2155–2184.