Lipid disorders

Published on 02/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1673 times

CHAPTER 6

Lipid disorders

1. What are the major lipids in the bloodstream?

2. What are lipoproteins?

3. What are the major lipoproteins in the bloodstream?

Chylomicrons, very-low-density lipoproteins (VLDLs), low-density lipoproteins (LDLs), and high-density lipoproteins (HDLs) are the major circulating lipoproteins. Their functions are as follows:

Chylomicrons Transport exogenous TGs from the gut to adipose tissue and muscle
VLDLs Transport endogenous TGs from the liver to adipose tissue and muscle
LDLs Transport cholesterol from the liver to peripheral tissues
HDLs Transport cholesterol from peripheral tissues to the liver

4. What are the apolipoproteins?

Apolipoproteins are located on the surfaces of the lipoproteins. They function as ligands for binding to lipoprotein receptors and as cofactors for metabolic enzymes. Their functions are as follows:

Apolipoprotein A Ligand for peripheral HDL receptors
Apolipoprotein B Ligand for peripheral LDL receptors
Apolipoprotein E Ligand for hepatic receptors for remnant particles
Apolipoprotein C-II Cofactor for lipoprotein lipase (LPL)

5. Name other enzymes and transport proteins that are important in lipoprotein metabolism.

See Table 6-1 and Figure 6-1.

TABLE 6-1.

ENZYMES AND TRANSPORT PROTEINS IMPORTANT IN LIPOPROTEIN METABOLISM

ENZYME/TRANSPORT PROTEIN FUNCTION
Hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase The rate-limiting enzyme in hepatic cholesterol synthesis
Lipoprotein lipase Removes TGs from chylomicrons and VLDLs in adipose tissue, leaving remnant particles
Hepatic lipase Removes additional TGs from remnant particles in the liver, converting them into LDLs
Lecithin cholesterol acyl transferase Esterifies cholesterol molecules on the surface of HDLs, drawing them into the HDL core
Cholesterol ester transfer protein Shuttles esterified cholesterol back and forth between HDLs and LDLs

HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; TG, triglyceride; VLDL, very-low-density lipoprotein.

6. Explain the function and metabolism of TGs.

7. Describe the function and metabolism of LDL.

8. What is the function of HDL?

HDL removes excess cholesterol from cells by two mechanisms. Nascent pre-βHDL is made in the liver and intestine. Surface Apo A1 on pre-βHDL acquires FC through the adenosine triphosphate (ATP)–binding cassette (ABC) transporter-A1 (ABCA1) on arterial wall macrophages. Plasma lecithin cholesterol acyl transferase (LCAT) then esterifies the FC to cholesterol ester (CE). In addition, HDL accepts additional FC from arterial macrophages through the ABCG1 transporter and the scavenger receptor, class B, type 1 (SR-B1) receptor. Cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP) transfers some CE back to LDL particles, and the mature HDL transports the remaining CE to the liver, where transfer occurs through hepatic SR-B1 receptors. In addition to performing reverse cholesterol transport, HDL reduces LDL oxidation, inhibits vascular inflammation, and improves endothelial function. All of these functions make HDL a potent antiatherogenic lipoprotein.

9. Describe the pathogenesis of the atherosclerotic plaque and arterial thrombosis.

10. Are elevated serum TG values harmful?

11. What is metabolic syndrome?

12. What is lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]?

13. What are the primary dyslipidemias?

Primary dyslipidemias are inherited disorders of lipoprotein metabolism. The major primary dyslipidemias and their lipid phenotypes are as follows:

PRIMARY DYSLIPIDEMIA PHENOTYPE
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) ↑↑Cholesterol
Polygenic hypercholesterolemia ↑Cholesterol
Familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCH) ↑Cholesterol and ↑TGs
Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (FDL) ↑Cholesterol and ↑TGs
Familial hypertriglyceridemia (FHT) ↑TGs
Familial hyperchylomicronemia (FHC) ↑↑TGs

↑, elevated; ↑↑, extremely elevated.

14. What is familial hypercholesterolemia?

FH is an inherited disease characterized by extreme elevations of serum cholesterol but normal serum TG levels. The disorder has a population frequency of 1:500 for heterozygotes, who generally have serum cholesterol levels of 300 to 800 mg/dL, and 1:1,000,000 for homozygotes, who have serum cholesterol levels of 600 to 1000 mg/dL. Most patients have genetic mutations resulting in deficient or dysfunctional LDL receptors (LDLRs). Other less common monogenic hypercholesterolemic disorders include apoprotein B mutations that produce a defective apo B that cannot bind to LDLR, proprotein convertase subtilisin–like kexin type 9 (PCSK9) mutations that cause accelerated LDLR degradation, LDLR adaptor protein-1 (LDLRAP1) mutations that prevent normal clustering of LDLR in cell surface clathrin-coated pits, and ATP-binding cassette G5 or G8 (ABCG5/8) mutations that cause abnormal cellular transport of cholesterol and plant sterols (sitosterolemia). These disorders are characterized by premature coronary artery disease (CAD), often before age 20 in homozygous FH, and tendon xanthomas.

15. What is familial combined hyperlipidemia?

16. What is familial dysbetalipoproteinemia?

17. What is polygenic hypercholesterolemia?

18. What are familial hypertriglyceridemia and familial hyperchylomicronemia?

19. How do you distinguish between familial combined hyperlipidemia and familial dysbetalipoproteinemia?

20. What causes familial low HDL?

21. Name the secondary dyslipidemias.

22. What is the cause of severe elevations of serum TGs?

23. Summarize the revised (2004) Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) risk stratification from the Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP).

24. What are the revised (2004) LDL cholesterol treatment goals from the ATP III?

PATIENT RISK LDL CHOLESTEROL GOAL (MG/DL)
High risk < 100 (optional < 70)
Moderately high risk < 130 (optional < 100)
Moderate risk < 130
Low risk < 160

25. What is therapeutic lifestyle change?

Therapeutic lifestyle change (TLC) should be encouraged for individuals with LDL cholesterol above their risk-stratified goal. Medications should be added. ATP III recommends therapeutic lifestyle change (TLC) for individuals with LDL cholesterol above their risk stratified goal. Medications can be added, as needed, but the TLC should continue. The components of TLC as recommended by ATP III are:

COMPONENT GOALS
Total fat 25%-35% of total calories
Saturated fat < 7% of total calories
Polyunsaturated fat < 10% of total calories
Monounsaturated fat < 20% of total calories
Carbohydrate 50%-60% of total calories
Protein Approximately 15% of total calories
Total calories Adjust to achieve and maintain ideal body weight
Dietary fiber 20-30 g/day
Physical activity Expend at least 200 kcal/day

26. What medications most effectively improve dyslipidemia?

27. How do the currently available statin medications differ?

The statins inhibit 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol synthesis. This leads to a decrease in cholesterol synthesis and an increase in LDL receptor–mediated removal of LDL. Some statins are naturally occurring compounds (lovastatin, pravastatin) and others are synthetic. Some are more hydrophilic (pravastatin, rosuvastatin), whereas the others are more lipophilic. The main differences of clinical interest, however, are their LDL-lowering potencies. The most commonly used statins, in order of relative LDL-lowering potencies, are fluvastatin < pravastatin < lovastatin < simvastatin < atorvastatin < rosuvastatin < pitavastatin. The initial statin dose produces the greatest LDL cholesterol reduction. Each subsequent doubling of the statin dose, on average, results only in an additional 6% decrease in serum LDL cholesterol level.

28. How should the statin-intolerant patient be approached?

Myopathy occurs in approximately 10% of patients treated with statins. Myopathy typically manifests as myalgias, with or without elevations in creatine kinase (CK). For CK elevations greater than five times the upper limit of normal or if the patient has moderate to severe symptoms, the statin should be stopped. Once the patient is asymptomatic and the CK level is reduced, reasonable approaches include a trial of low-dose fluvastatin or pravastatin, alternate-daily or weekly dosage of a more potent statin such as rosuvastatin or pitavastatin, or combination of a low-dose statin with a non-statin cholesterol agent (ezetimibe or bile acid sequestrant). Over-the-counter preparations containing natural statin-like agents, such as red yeast rice, can also be tried, although they undergo limited quality control and have low efficacy. In patients with mild symptoms and CK elevations less than five times the upper limit of normal, the statin may be continued. If symptoms worsen, the CK level should be rechecked.

29. How effective and safe are combinations of lipid-lowering medications?

30. Does aggressive cholesterol-lowering therapy effectively and safely reduce the risk of coronary artery disease?

Clinical trials have repeatedly demonstrated the efficacy of aggressive cholesterol-lowering with statins in reducing myocardial infarction, strokes, and cardiovascular mortality in patients with a previous history of CAD (secondary prevention—4S (Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study), CARE (Cholesterol and Recurrent Events), LIPID (Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease), HPS (Heart Protection Study), TNT (Treating to New Targets), PROVE IT (Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy), AVERT (Atorvastatin Versus Revascularization Treatment), and ALLIANCE (Aggressive Lipid Lowering to Alleviate New Cardiovascular Endpoints). A meta-analysis from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration suggests that each 1-mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol results in an approximately 20% reduction in the annual rate of cardiovascular disease.

The role of statins in the setting of primary prevention is less clear. Some trials have demonstrated a benefit—WOSCOPS (West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study), AFCAPS (Air Force Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study), HPS (Heart Protection Study), ASCOT-LLA, CARDS (Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study), and JUPITER (Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin). A Cochrane meta-analysis showed that statins can reduce all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and cardiovascular events. However, another meta-analysis did not find a reduction in all-cause mortality, and the cost effectiveness of statins and effects on quality of life are unclear.

The major safety concerns about statin therapy are hepatotoxicity and myopathy. Both of these problems were relatively rare in the clinical trials but occur more commonly in clinical practice in patients who require higher doses or take them in combination with other medications that may interfere with statin metabolism. In particular, high-dose simvastatin therapy has been associated with an increased risk of myopathy.

31. What is the appropriate role for niacin?

Niacin, which decreases VLDL production, is often used in combination with statins in order to further decrease LDL cholesterol levels, decrease TGs, and increase HDL cholesterol levels. Niacin also decreases lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels. However, a meta-analysis found no effect of niacin on total mortality or cardiac mortality. The ARBITER 6-HALTS (Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol 6: HDL and LDL Treatment Strategies in Atherosclerosis) study found that among patients taking statins, niacin was superior to ezetimibe on the surrogate end point of regression of carotid intima-media thickness. The later AIM-HIGH (Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome with Low HDL Cholesterol/High Triglyceride and Impact on Global Health Outcomes) study found no benefit to adding niacin to statin therapy. Thus the appropriate role for niacin in the treatment of dyslipidemia is currently unclear.

32. What is the appropriate role for ezetimibe?

33. What is the appropriate role for fibrates?

Fibrates, which decrease VLDL production, are the most effective TG-lowering agents. They also increase HDL cholesterol and modestly decrease LDL cholesterol. A meta-analysis showed that fibrates decreased cardiovascular events but had no effect on stroke, cardiac mortality, or total mortality. The FIELD (Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes) study of fenofibrate in patients with type 2 diabetes reported a nonsignificant 11% reduction in cardiovascular events. The ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes) Lipid Trial in patients with type 2 diabetes did not find any reduction in cardiovascular end points when fenofibrate was added to simvastatin. Given the fact that elevated TGs have not yet been shown to be causally related to cardiovascular risk, the appropriate role for fibrates is still somewhat unclear.

34. What are CETP inhibitors?

35. Is measurement of inflammatory markers a useful tool in CAD risk assessment?

Inflammation within an atherosclerotic plaque makes the plaque more likely to rupture, precipitating an acute ischemic event. Highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), a nonspecific marker of inflammation, appears to predict CAD risk, as do LDL cholesterol levels. The JUPITER (Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin) trial showed a benefit to treatment with rosuvastatin in individuals with LDL cholesterol levels lower than 130 mg/dL and hsCRP levels of 2.0 mg/L or less. Thus information on LDL cholesterol and hsCRP together can be useful to providers making decisions about which patients to treat more aggressively but need not be performed routinely in all patients.

An indirect measure of inflammation is lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2), an enzyme produced by inflammatory cells and liver cells that circulates in the plasma primarily bound to LDL particles. It hydrolyzes oxidized phospholipids on LDL particles, producing two inflammatory mediators, lysophosphatidylcholine and oxidized fatty acids, which have been linked to atherosclerotic plaque formation. Measurement of Lp-PLA2 may be considered for selected patients at increased cardiovascular risk as part of the initial clinical assessment. Studies of daraplabid, an Lp-PLA2 inhibitor, are ongoing, but there is no current evidence that lowering Lp-PLA2 will reduce cardiovascular risk.

36. Should we be using measurements of lipoprotein size and number?

37. How should the patient with severe hypertriglyceridemia be managed?

Serum TG levels above 1000 mg/dL must be lowered quickly because of the high risk of precipitating acute pancreatitis. Medications alone are not effective when TG levels are this high. Patients must immediately be started on a very-low-fat (less than 5% fat) diet until the TG level is less than 1000 mg/dL. Such a diet lowers serum TGs approximately 20% each day. Contributing factors, most commonly uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, alcohol abuse, estrogen use, and medications for treatment of human immunodeficiency virus, must simultaneously be addressed. After serum TG levels are less than 1000 mg/dL, the most effective medications to reduce serum TGs further are the fibrates. If these medications do not lower serum TG sufficiently, niacin, fish oils, or a statin may be added to the regimen.

Bibliography

, ACCORD Study Group. Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1563–1574.

, AIM-HIGH Investigators. Niacin in patients with low HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy. N Engl J Med 2011;365:2255–2267.

Cannon, CP. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol as the Holy Grail. JAMA. 2011;306:2153–2155.

Cannon, CP, Giugliano, RP, Blazing, MA, et al, Rationale and design of IMPROVE-IT (IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial): comparison of ezetimibe/simvastatin versus simvastatin monotherapy on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J 2008;156:826–832.

, Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet 2010;376:1670–1681.

Colhoun, HM, Betteridge, DJ, Durrington, PN, et al, Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS). multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:685–696.

Davidson, MH, Ballantyne, C, Jacobson, TA, et al, Clinical utility of inflammatory markers and advanced lipoprotein testing. advice from an expert panel of lipid specialists. J Clin Lipidology 2011;5:338–367.

Downs, JR, Clearfield, M, Weis, S, et al, Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels. results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS. Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study. JAMA 1995;279:1615–1622.

Eckel, RH. Approach to the patient who is intolerant of statin therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:2015–2022.

, Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration. Lipid-related markers and cardiovascular disease prediction. JAMA 2012;307:2499–2506.

Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Education Program (NCEP): 2001 expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III), JAMA 285:2486–2497.

Ford, I, Murray, H, Packard, CJ, et al. Long-term follow-up of the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1477–1486.

Greving, JP, Visseren, FLJ, De Wit GA, et al, Statin treatment for primary prevention of vascular disease. whom to treat? Cost-effectiveness analysis. BMJ 2011;342:1672.

Grundy, SM, Cleeman, JI, Merz, CNB, et al. Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Circulation. 2004;110:227–239.

, Heart Protection Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2002;360:7–22.

, Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. C-reactive protein concentration and the vascular benefits of statin therapy: an analysis of 20,536 patients in the Heart Protection Study. Lancet 2011;377:469–476.

Hou, R, Goldberg, AC, Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. statins, ezetimibe, bile acid sequestrants, and combinationscomparative efficacy and safety. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am 2009;38:79–97.

Jun, M, Foote, C, Lv, J, et al, Effects of fibrates on cardiovascular outcomes. a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2010;375:1875–1884.

Kastelein, JJ, Akdim, F, Stroes, ESG, et al. Simvastatin with or without ezetimibe in familial hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1431–1443.

Keech, A, Simes, RJ, Barter, P, et al, Effects of long-term fenofibrate therapy on cardiovascular events in 9795. people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the FIELD Study). randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;366:1849–1861.

Koren, MJ, Hunninghake, DB, for the ALLIANCE Investigators. Clinical outcomes in managed care patients with coronary heart disease treated aggressively in lipid lowering disease management clinics. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1772–1779.

LaRosa, J, Grundy, SM, Waters, DD, et al. Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1425–1435.

, Lipid Study Group. Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1349–1357.

Miller, M, Stone, NJ, Ballantyne, C, et al, Triglycerides and cardiovascular disease. a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011;123:2292–2333.

Pitt, B, Waters, D, Brown, WV, et al. Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy compared with angioplasty in stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:70–76.

Ray, KK, Seshasai, SRK, Erqou, S, et al, Statins and all-cause mortality in high-risk primary prevention. a meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:1024–1031.

Ridker, PM, Danielson, E, Fonseca, FAH, et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195–2207.

Sacks, FM, Pfeffer, MA, Moye, LA, et al. The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1001–1009.

, Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomized trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444. patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S. Lancet 1994;344:1383–1389.

Semenkovich, CF, Goldberg, AC, Goldberg, IJ. Disorders of lipid metabolism. In Melmed S, Polonsky KS, Larsen PR, eds.: Williams Textbook of Endocrinology, 12th edition, Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2011.

Sever, PS, Dahlof, B, Poulter, NR, et al, Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower than average cholesterol concentrations, in the Anglo-22. Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA). a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2003;361:1149–1158.

Shepherd, J, Cobbe, SM, Ford, I, et al. Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1301–1307.

Studer, M, Briel, M, Leimenstoll, B, et al, Effect of different antilipidemic agents and diets on mortality. a systematic review. Arch Inter Med 2005;165:725–730.

, Study of Effectiveness of Additional Reductions in Cholesterol and Homocysteine (SEARCH) Collaborative Group. Intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol with 80 mg versus 20 mg simvastatin daily in 12,064 survivors of myocardial infarction: a double-blind randomized trial. Lancet 2010;376:1658–1669.

Taylor, AJ, Villines, TC, Stanek, EJ, et al. Extended-release niacin or ezetimibe and carotid intima-media thickness. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2113–2122.

Taylor, F, Ward, K, Moore, THM, et al. Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 1, 2011. CD004816

, Third Report of the National Education Program (NCEP). Expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 2002;106:3143–3421.