Leukaemia

Published on 02/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Basic Science

Last modified 02/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2286 times

50 Leukaemia

Leukaemias and lymphomas are the commonest forms of haematological malignancy. Although rare, they are of particular interest in that dramatic improvements in the prognosis of patients with these cancers have been achieved through the use of chemotherapy, and cure is now a possibility for many patients.

Many forms of leukaemia exist, but they are all characterised by the production of excessive numbers of abnormal white blood cells. The leukaemias can be broadly divided into four groups:

The adjectives ‘myeloid’ and ‘lymphoid’ refer to the predominant cell involved, and the suffix-cytic and -blastic to mature and immature cells, respectively. These characteristics can be determined by a combination of cellular appearances, surface antigen expression and cytogenetic features. The international standard for leukaemia classification is the WHO system (Swerdlow et al., 2008).

Epidemiology

Haematological malignancies account for only 5% of all cancers; of these, CLL is the most common form of leukaemia. UK incidence data are presented in Table 50.1. CLL mainly affects an older age group: 90% of patients are over the age of 50 and nearly two-thirds are over 60 years old at diagnosis. It rarely occurs in young people and is twice as common in men as in women. CML is primarily a disease of middle age with the median onset in the 40–50 year old age group, but it can occur in younger people.

Table 50.1 Incidence of leukaemia in the UK (Leukaemia and Lymphoma Research, 2010)

  New cases/year Incidence per 100,000 of the population
CLL 2750 4.58
CML 750 1.5
ALL 650 1.00
AML 1950 3.25

Acute leukaemia is rare, with a total annual incidence of approximately 4 per 100,000 population. The more common form of the disease is AML, which accounts for 75% of cases. The incidence of AML rises steadily with age, occurring only rarely in young children. In contrast, ALL is predominantly a childhood disease, with the peak incidence in the 3–5 year age group, and is the most common childhood cancer.

Aetiology

In common with other cancers, the aetiology of leukaemia is not fully understood. Leukaemia is thought to result from a combination of factors that induce genetic mutations which allow mutated cells to proliferate faster than normal cells and/or to fail to die in response to normal apoptotic signals. Epidemiological studies have, however, identified a number of specific risk factors for the development of leukaemia, which are described as follows.

Pathophysiology

In leukaemia, the normal process of haemopoiesis is altered (Fig. 50.1). Transformation to malignancy appears to occur in a single cell, usually at the pluripotential stem cell level, but it may occur in a committed stem cell with capacity for more limited differentiation. Accumulation of malignant cells leads to progressive impairment of the normal bone marrow function.

Acute leukaemias

In acute leukaemia, the normal bone marrow is replaced by a malignant clone of immature blast cells derived from the myeloid (in AML) or lymphoid (in ALL) series. More than 20% of the cellular elements of the bone marrow are replaced with blasts. This is usually associated with the appearance of blasts in the peripheral circulation accompanied by worsening pancytopenia as a result of the marrow’s reduced ability to produce normal blood cells as the proportion of malignant cells increases. In ALL, the blasts may infiltrate lymph nodes and other tissues such as liver, spleen, testis and the meninges, in particular. In AML, blasts tend to infiltrate skin, gums, liver and spleen.

Classification of acute myeloblastic leukaemia

AML has traditionally been classified on the basis of morphological features of the disease. Subtypes displaying granulocytic, monocytic, erythroid and megakaryocytic differentiation can be demonstrated. Recently, the World Health Organization (WHO) has updated this system (Table 50.2). AML is now classified using a combination of morphological, genetic and immunological cell marker features (surface antigen expression) in an attempt to define disease groups of greater prognostic significance (Swerdlow et al., 2008).

Table 50.2 WHO classification of AML

Subgroup Examples
AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities Inversion chromosome 16 (inv 16)
  t(15;17)
  t(8;21)
AML with multilineage dysplasia  
Therapy-related AML  
AML not otherwise classified AML without maturation
  AML with granulocytic maturation
  AML with granulocytic and monocytic differentiation
  AML with monocytic differentiation
  AML with erythroid differentiation
  AML with megakaryocytic differentiation

Classification of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

As with AML, the WHO classification system takes account of morphological, genetic and immunological features. The disease is, however, mainly classified immunologically, based on the presence or absence of B- or T-cell markers (Table 50.3). Each subtype displays different clinical presentations, response to treatment and, ultimately, prognosis, with pre-B having the best prognosis and B-ALL the worst. It is worth noting that B-ALL (Burkitt’s type), which is associated with translocations of the myc gene normally located on chromosome 8, seems to be a morphologically and biologically distinct form of leukaemia.

Table 50.3 Classification of ALL

Pre-B ALL Possessing the common ALL antigen CD 10
B cell type B-ALL of Burkitt’s type
T cell type T-ALL
Null Non-B, non-T and lacking the common ALL antigen CD 10

Clinical manifestations

Chronic leukaemia

Treatment

Although significant progress has been made in the treatment of leukaemia, work continues to further improve prognosis. As leukaemias are rare malignancies, the most important studies are undertaken on a national or international basis. In addition to the specific anti-leukaemia treatment, general supportive therapy is vital to manage both the disease and the complications of therapy.

Acute leukaemia

At the outset, intensive combination chemotherapy is given in the hope of achieving a complete remission (CR). This initial phase of treatment is termed induction or remission induction chemotherapy. A CR can only be achieved by virtual ablation of the bone marrow, followed by recovery of normal haemopoiesis. If two cycles of therapy fail to induce CR, an alternative drug regimen can be used. If this is unsuccessful, it is unlikely that CR will be achieved. The subsequent duration of the first remission is closely linked to survival.

Remission is defined as the absence of all clinical and microscopic signs of leukaemia, less than 5% blast forms in the bone marrow and return of normal cellularity and haemopoietic elements. Despite achieving CR, occult residual disease (also termed minimal residual disease or MRD) will persist, and further intensive therapy is given in an attempt to sustain the remission. This post-remission consolidation therapy may comprise chemotherapy or a combination of chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation.

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Treatment of ALL in childhood has been one of the success stories of the past 3 decades. Over 80% of children will achieve a remission lasting more than 5 years, and current studies are often focused on trying to identify the 20% of children with poor risk disease and treating them more aggressively (Vrooman and Silverman, 2009). Unfortunately, the results in adults are not so impressive. The combination of vincristine, prednisolone, anthracyclines and asparaginase induces CR in about 90% of children with ALL and 80% of adults, although sadly relapse is far more common in adults (Table 50.5). Other active drugs in the treatment of ALL include methotrexate, 6-mercaptopurine, cyclophosphamide and mitoxantrone.

Patients with ALL are at a high risk of developing CNS infiltration. Cytotoxic drugs penetrate poorly into the CNS which thus acts as a sanctuary site for leukaemic cells. For this reason, all patients with ALL receive CNS prophylaxis. Cranial irradiation plus intrathecal methotrexate or high-dose systemic methotrexate can be used.

Maintenance treatment is important to sustain a CR. It is usually milder than induction or consolidation chemotherapy, but is carried on for at least 18 months. Treatment usually consists of weekly methotrexate and daily 6-mercaptopurine with intermittent vincristine and prednisolone.

The treatment of relapsed disease varies with the site of relapse. Isolated CNS or testicular relapse may be successfully treated with radiation and reinduction therapy. Cure can still be achieved for some patients. Bone marrow relapse is much more difficult to cure, especially if it occurs early.

A small proportion of paediatric patients and a larger proportion of adult patients have the Philadelphia chromosome translocation within their ALL blasts. Such patients have a relatively poor prognosis and therefore require more intensive therapy. There is some evidence that drug combinations including imatinib may enhance the response of these leukaemias to therapy.

Acute myeloblastic leukaemia (non-acute promyelocytic leukaemia)

As for ALL, the treatment of AML involves induction and consolidation chemotherapy. In AML therapy, however, the chemotherapy regimens used to achieve remission are much more myelotoxic, and patients require intensive supportive care to survive periods of bone marrow aplasia (Fig. 50.2). The pyrimidine analogue cytarabine has formed the basis of treatment for AML for 20 years. The addition of daunorubicin and oral thioguanine has achieved a CR rate of 75% in patients under the age of 60 years and about 50% in those over 60 years (Dohner et al., 2010). The precise dose and scheduling of these agents is continually being refined in order to improve the response rates. Despite the numbers of patients who achieve CR following induction therapy, the majority relapse, with only about 25% becoming long-term disease-free survivors (Stone et al., 2004). Thus, in common with ALL, additional post-remission therapy is required. Intensive consolidation chemotherapy with high-dose cytarabine and daunorubicin or amsacrine appears to improve survival rates to approximately 50% after 3 years, with even more encouraging results being obtained in patients under 25 years of age (Dohner et al., 2010; Robak and Wierzbowska, 2009). There is generally no role for maintenance therapy in AML. Similarly, CNS prophylaxis is not routinely indicated though patients thought to be at particularly high risk of CNS disease, such as those with testicular or sinus involvement, should receive prophylactic therapy.

An alternative approach to post-remission therapy is stem cell transplantation. In patients under 40 years of age, allogeneic bone marrow transplantation has resulted in disease-free survival of 45–65% at 5 years post-transplant. These patients are considered cured of their disease. Only about 10% of patients are suitable for allogeneic bone marrow transplants, and there is little evidence to suggest that autologous stem cell transplantation improves the outcome for patients with AML in first CR. It is always worth remembering that AML is most common in the elderly, and intensive intravenous chemotherapy regimens are not always appropriate for this population of patients.

Treatment of AML in relapse is difficult and the prognosis is generally poor. Encouraging results have been seen using a combination of fludarabine, cytosine arabinoside and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Novel approaches in AML therapy are often piloted in this group of poor-risk patients. A combination of anti-CD33 antibody, which targets myeloid blasts, with calicheamicin, an anthracycline antibiotic, is a promising and effective approach (Stone et al., 2004), but appears most effective when given in combination with conventional chemotherapy. A newly developed purine analogue, clofarabine, has also been shown to have activity against AML. This drug is a promising agent, particularly in the treatment of older patients, as pilot studies suggest that its toxic effects may be less severe than those associated with other chemotherapy regimens (Robak and Wierzbowska, 2009). 5-Azacytidine is also of interest, especially in older patients and those whose disease has evolved from myelodysplastic syndrome MDS. This agent inhibits DNA methyltransferase resulting in DNA hypomethylation. This process is thought to increase activity of some tumour suppressor genes resulting in anti-tumour effects. The agent has been shown to slow the rate of progression to AML in patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and is currently the subject of clinical trials in AML.

Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia

This subtype of AML deserves special consideration as the treatment is quite different from that of other AML variants. APL is associated with the t(15;17) translocation which involves a genetic translocation of material between chromosomes 15 and 17. The disease is clinically characterised by the presence of disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC) at presentation. Since these patients are so prone to life-threatening haemorrhage at diagnosis, the management of a new case of APL is considered a medical emergency. The leukaemic cells are exquisitely sensitive to all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), which induces blast maturation and can induce remission when used as a single agent (Sanz et al., 2009; Soignet and Maslak, 2004). Using a combination of ATRA and anthracycline chemotherapy, it is now possible to achieve long-term cure in >80% patients. There are some data to suggest that the ongoing use of ATRA in consolidation and maintenance treatment improves outcome further. A number of studies have been published demonstrating the efficacy of arsenic trioxide (ATO) in treating relapsed or refractory APL. Comparison of ATRA and anthracyclines against ATO and ATRA is now the subject of a large UK study of newly diagnosed patients (AML 17). The latter regimen has the potential advantage of avoiding significant myelosuppression.