Lead Poisoning

Published on 22/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Pediatrics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2029 times

Chapter 702 Lead Poisoning

Lead is a metal that exists in four isotopic forms. Chemically, its low melting point and ability to form stable compounds have made it useful in the manufacture of hundreds of products. Clinically, it is purely a toxicant; no organism has an essential function that is lead-dependent. Nevertheless, its commercial attractiveness has resulted in the processing of millions of tons of lead ore, leading to widespread dissemination of lead in the human environment.

The threshold level at which lead causes biochemical, subclinical, or clinical disturbance has been redefined many times during the past 50 yr. The blood lead level (BLL) is the gold standard for determining health effects. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and numerous other national and international organizations (e.g., Global Lead Network—Alliance to End Childhood Lead Poisoning, and The National Referral Centre for Lead Poisoning in India) consider a BLL of 10 µg/dL or greater as a level of concern for public health purposes. However, lead toxicity occurs below this threshold, and no safe level has been identified. Current recommendations by the CDC address this gap.

Public Health History

Between 1976 and 1980, more than 85% of preschool children in the USA had BLLs of 10 µg/dL or higher; 98% of African-American preschoolers fulfilled this criterion. Over the next 25 yr, government regulations resulted in the significant reduction of three main contributors to lead exposure by means of (1) the elimination of the use of tetraethyl leaded gasoline, (2) the banning of lead-containing solder to seal food- and beverage-containing cans, and (3) the application of a federal rule that limited the amount of lead allowed in paint intended for household use to less than 0.06% by weight. Surveillance by the CDC has shown that the prevalence of elevated BLLs (10 µg/dL) has declined markedly, and by 2004 it was below 1.5% in all preschoolers. However, an additional 6% had a level between 5 and 10 µg/dL, and 23.6% had levels between 2.5 and 5 µg/dL. In sum, nearly a third of U.S. preschool children continued to have measurable BLLs as measured by currently available clinical laboratory methodologies. Thus, nearly 6 million children continue to have evidence of lead exposure and nearly 300,000 have values that reach the CDC level of concern. Fortunately, children with levels high enough to be life-threatening are only rarely seen, although deaths continue to occur. Factors that indicate increased risk of lead poisoning, in addition to preschool age, include low socioeconomic status; living in older housing, built primarily before 1960; urban location; and African-American race. Another high-risk group that has been identified consists of recent immigrants from less wealthy countries, including adoptees.

Progress is also being made globally. In Mexico, the introduction of unleaded gasoline in 1990 was associated with a decline in BLLs among first-grade students, from 17 µg/dL in 1990 to 6.2 µg/dL in 1997. By 2009, all but 17 countries had completely phased out leaded gasoline usage, with the remaining countries that continue to use leaded gasoline being primarily from the former Soviet Union and in North Africa. In Malta, after the import of red lead paint was banned and the use of lead-treated wood for fuel in bakeries was prohibited, mean BLLs of pregnant women and newborns decreased by 45%. After it was documented that children living in the neighborhood of a battery factory in Nicaragua had a mean BLL of 17.2 µg/dL, whereas children in the control community had a mean BLL of 7.4 µg/dL, the factory was closed. Despite these advances, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that nearly a quarter billion people have BLLs above 5 µg/dL; of those that are children, 90% live in developing countries, where in some regions BLLs may be 10- to 20-fold higher than in developed countries.

Unfortunately, lead-related disasters continue to occur. In 2010, the CDC identified numerous lead-contaminated villages in northern Nigeria. The grinding of ore to extract gold caused widespread leaded dust dissemination. It is likely that hundreds of children died as a consequence of this activity, and all remaining children in the villages assessed to date were lead poisoned, with 97% having a blood lead level ≥45 µg/dL.

Sources of Exposure

Lead poisoning may occur in utero, because lead readily crosses the placenta from maternal blood. The spectrum of toxicity is similar to that experienced by children after birth. The source of maternal blood lead content is either redistribution from endogenous stores (i.e., the mother’s skeleton) or lead newly acquired from ongoing environmental exposure.

Several hundred products contain lead, including batteries, cable sheathing, cosmetics, mineral supplements, plastics, toys (Table 702-1), and traditional medicines (Table 702-2). Major sources of exposure vary among and within countries; the major source of exposure in the USA remains old lead-based paint. About 38 million homes, mainly built before 1950, have lead-based paint (2000 estimate). As paint deteriorates, it chalks, flakes, and turns to dust. Improper rehabilitation work of painted surfaces (e.g., sanding) can result in dissemination of lead-containing dust throughout a home. The dust can coat all surfaces, including children’s hands. All of these forms of lead can be ingested. If heat is used to strip paint, then lead vapor concentrations in the room can reach levels sufficient to cause lead poisoning via inhalation.

Table 702-2 CASES OF LEAD ENCEPHALOPATHY ASSOCIATED WITH TRADITIONAL MEDICINES BY TYPE OF MEDICATION

TRADITIONAL MEDICAL SYSTEM CASES OF LEAD ENCEPHALOPATHY N (%) N (%) PEDIATRIC CASES WITHIN CAM SYSTEM OR MEDICATION
Ayurveda 5 (7) 1(20)
Ghasard 1 (1) 1 (100)
Traditional Middle Eastern practices 66 (87) 66 (100)
Azarcon and Greta 2 (3) 2 (100)
Traditional Chinese medicine 2 (3) 2 (100)
Total 76 (100) 72 (95)

CAM, complementary and alternative medicines.

From Karri SK, Saper RB, Kales SN: Lead encephalopathy due to traditional medicines, Curr Drug Safety 3:54–59, 2008.

Metabolism

The nonnutritive hand-to-mouth activity of young children is the most common pathway by which lead enters the body. In nearly all cases, lead is ingested, either as a component of dust licked off of surfaces or in swallowed paint chips, through water contaminated by its flow through lead pipes or brass fixtures, or from food or liquids contaminated by contact with lead-glazed ceramic ware. Cutaneous contamination with inorganic lead compounds, such as those found in pigments, does not result in a substantial amount of absorption. Organic lead compounds such as tetraethyl lead may penetrate through skin, however.

The percentage of lead absorbed from the gut depends on several factors: particle size, pH, other material in the gut, and nutritional status of essential elements. Large paint chips are difficult to digest and are mainly excreted. Fine dust can be dissolved more readily, however, especially in an acid medium. Lead eaten on an empty stomach is better absorbed than that taken with a meal. The presence of calcium and iron may decrease lead absorption by direct competition for binding sites; iron (and probably calcium) deficiency results in enhanced lead absorption, retention, and toxicity.

After absorption, lead is disseminated throughout the body. Most retained lead accumulates in bone, where it may reside for years. It circulates bound to erythrocytes; about 97% in blood is bound on or in the red blood cells. The plasma fraction is too small to be measured by conventional techniques; it is presumably the plasma portion that may enter cells and induce toxicity. Thus, clinical laboratories report the blood lead level, not the serum or plasma lead level.

Lead has multiple effects in cells. It binds to enzymes, particularly those with available sulfhydryl groups, changing the contour and diminishing function. The heme pathway, present in all cells, has three enzymes susceptible to lead inhibitory effects. The last enzyme in this pathway, ferrochelatase, enables protoporphyrin to chelate iron, thus forming heme. Protoporphyrin is readily measurable in red blood cells. Levels of protoporphyrin higher than 35 µg/dL are abnormal and are consistent with lead poisoning, iron deficiency, or recent inflammatory disease.

Lack of heme affects multiple metabolic pathways. The accumulation of excess amounts of protoporphyrin and other heme precursors also is toxic. Measurement of the erythrocyte protoporphyrin (EP) level is, therefore, a useful tool for monitoring biochemical lead toxicity. EP levels begin to rise several weeks after BLLs have reached 20 µg/dL in a susceptible portion of the population and are elevated in nearly all children with BLLs higher than 50 µg/dL. A drop in EP levels also lags behind a decline in BLLs by several weeks, because it depends on both cell turnover and cessation of further overproduction by marrow red blood cell precursors.

A second mechanism of lead toxicity works via its competition with calcium. Many calcium-binding proteins have a higher affinity for lead than for calcium. Lead bound to these proteins may alter function, resulting in abnormal intracellular and intercellular signaling. Neurotransmitter release is, in part, a calcium-dependent process that is adversely affected by lead.

Although these two mechanisms of toxicity may be reversible, a third mechanism prevents the development of the normal tertiary brain structure. In immature mammals the normal neuronal pruning process that results in elimination of multiple intercellular brain connections is inhibited by lead. Failure to construct the appropriate tertiary brain structure during the first few years of life may result in a permanent abnormality. It is tempting to extrapolate from these anatomic findings to the clinical correlate of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder observed in lead-poisoned children.

Clinical Effects

The BLL is the best-studied measure of the lead burden in children. Although subclinical and clinical findings correlate with BLLs in populations, there is considerable interindividual variability in this relationship. Lead encephalopathy is more likely to be observed in children with BLLs higher than 100 µg/dL; however, one child with a BLL of 300 µg/dL may have no symptoms, whereas another with the same level may be comatose. Susceptibility may be associated with polymorphisms in genes coding for lead-binding proteins, such as delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase, an enzyme in the heme pathway.

Several subclinical effects of lead have been demonstrated in cross-sectional epidemiologic studies. Hearing and height are inversely related to BLLs in children; in neither case, however, does the lead effect reach a level that would bring an individual child to medical attention. As BLLs increased in the study population, more sound (at all frequencies) was needed to reach the hearing threshold. Children with higher BLLs are slightly shorter than those with lower levels; for every 10-µg increase in the BLL, the children are 1 cm shorter. Chronic lead exposure also may delay puberty.

Several longitudinal studies have followed cohorts of children from birth for as long as 20 yr and examined the relationship between BLLs and cognitive test scores over time. In general, there is agreement that BLLs, expressed as either a level obtained at around 2 yr of age or a measure that integrates multiple BLLs drawn from a subject over time, are inversely related to cognitive test scores. On average, for each 1-µg/dL elevation in BLL the cognitive score is approximately 0.25-0.50 points lower. Because the BLLs from early childhood are predictors of the cognitive test results performed years later, this finding implies that the effects of lead can be permanent. Concurrent testing of lead levels and cognition sometimes also shows an association.

The effect of in utero lead exposure is less clear. Scores on the Bayley Scale of Mental Development were obtained repeatedly every 6 mo for the first 2 yr of life in a cohort of infants born to middle-class families. Results correlated inversely with cord BLL, a measure of in utero exposure, but not with BLLs obtained concurrently at the time of developmental testing. However, after 2 yr of age, all other cognitive tests performed on the cohort over the next 10y r correlated with the BLLs at age 2 yr but not with cord BLLs, indicating that the effects of prenatal lead exposure on brain function were superseded by early childhood events and later BLLs. Later studies performed in cohorts of Mexican children monitored from the prenatal period confirms the association between in utero lead exposure and later cognitive outcomes. No threshold for BLL was identified in these studies; maternal blood lead levels between 0 and 10 µg/dL even as early as the first trimester were associated with about a 6-point drop in cognitive test score results when the children were tested up to age 10 yr.

An intervention study, in which moderately lead-poisoned children with initial BLLs 20-55 µg/dL were aggressively managed over 6 mo, addressed the issue of the effects of treatment on cognitive development. Components of treatment included education regarding sources of lead and its abatement, nutritional guidance, multiple home and clinic visits, and, for a subset, chelation therapy. Average BLLs declined and cognitive scores were inversely related to the change in BLL. For every 1-µg/dL fall in BLL, cognitive scores were 0.25 point higher.

Behavior also is adversely affected by lead exposure. Hyperactivity is noted in young school-aged children with histories of lead poisoning or with concurrent elevations in BLL. Older children with higher bone lead content are more likely to be aggressive and to have behaviors that are predictive of later juvenile delinquency. One report supports the concept of long-term effects of early lead exposure. In this longitudinal study, the mothers of a cohort were enrolled during their pregnancies. BLLs were obtained early in pregnancy, at birth, and then multiple times in the offspring during the first 6 years. The investigators report that the relative rate of arrests, especially for violent crimes, increased significantly in relationship to the BLLs. For every 5-µg/dL increase in BLL the adjusted arrest rate was 1.40 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07–1.85) for prenatal BLLs and 1.27 (95% CI, 1.03–1.57) for 6-yr BLLs.

Whether the behavioral effects of lead are reversible is unclear. In one small, short-term study, 7 yr old hyperactive children with BLLs in the 20s were randomly allocated to receive a chelating agent (penicillamine), methylphenidate, or placebo. Teacher and parent ratings of behavior improved for the first two groups but not the placebo group. BLLs declined only in the chelated group. Two year old lead-poisoned children enrolled in a placebo-controlled trial of the chelating agent succimer showed no mean difference in behavior at 4 or 7 yr of age.

These studies support the concept that early exposure to lead can result in long-term deficits in cognition and behavior; they also hold out the possibility that reductions in lead burden may be associated with improvement in cognitive test scores.

Diagnosis

Screening

It is estimated that 99% of lead-poisoned children are identified by screening procedures rather than through clinical recognition of lead-related symptoms. Until 1997 universal screening by blood lead testing of all children at ages 12 mo and 24 mo was the standard in the USA. Given the national decline in the prevalence of lead poisoning, the recommendations have been revised to target blood lead testing of high-risk populations. High risk is based on an evaluation of the likelihood of lead exposure. Departments of health are responsible for determining the local prevalence of lead poisoning as well as the percentage of housing built before 1950, the period of peak leaded paint use. When this information is available, informed screening guidelines for practitioners can be issued. For instance, in the state of New York, where a large percentage of housing was built pre-1950, the Department of Health mandates that all children be tested for lead poisoning via blood analyses. In the absence of such data the practitioner should continue to test all children at both 12 mo and 24 mo. In areas where the prevalence of lead poisoning and old housing is low, targeted screening may be performed on the basis of a risk assessment. Three questions form the basis of a questionnaire (Table 702-3), and items that are pertinent to the locale or individual may be added. If there is a lead-based industry in the child’s neighborhood, the child is a recent immigrant from a country that still permits use of leaded gasoline, or the child has pica or developmental delay, blood lead testing would be appropriate. All Medicaid-eligible children should be screened. Venous sampling is preferred to capillary sampling because the chances of false-positive and false-negative results are less with the former.

Interpretation of Blood Lead Levels

The threshold for lead effects and the level of concern for risk management purposes are not the same. Laboratory issues make the interpretation of values between 0 and 5 µg/dL more difficult. Some labs certified as proficient by the CDC or other testing programs can accurately measure BLLs to 2 µg/dL; others only to 5 µg/dL. A screening value at or above 2 µg/dL is consistent with exposure and requires a second round of testing for a diagnosis and to determine the appropriate intervention. The timing for the “repeat” evaluation depends on the initial value (Table 702-4). If the diagnostic (second) test confirms that the BLL is elevated, then further testing is required by the recommended schedule (Table 702-5). A confirmed venous BLL of 45 µg/dL or higher requires prompt chelation therapy.

Table 702-4 FOLLOW-UP OF BLOOD LEAD LEVEL SCREENING TEST

IF SCREENING BLOOD LEAD LEVEL (µg/dL) IS: CDC: REPEAT DIAGNOSTIC VENOUS BLOOD LEAD TESTING BY: AAP: REPEAT DIAGNOSTIC VENOUS BLOOD LEAD TESTING BY:
<10 Not defined; < 1 year Not defined
10-19 3 mo 1 mo
20-44 1 wk-1 mo (sooner the higher the lead) 1 wk
45-59 48 hr 48hr
60-69 24 hr 48 hr
≥70 Immediately Immediately

AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics; CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Adapted from Screening young children for lead poisoning: guidance for state and local public health officials, Atlanta, 1997, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Environmental Health: Screening for elevated blood lead levels, Pediatrics 101:1072–1078, 1998.

Table 702-5 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHILDREN WITH CONFIRMED (VENOUS) ELEVATED BLOOD LEAD CONCENTRATIONS

BLOOD LEAD CONCENTRATION (µg/dL) RECOMMENDATIONS
<10 As levels approach 10 µg/dL use the 10-14 µg/dL recommendations
10-14 Lead education (sources, route of entry):
Dietary counseling (calcium and iron)
Environmental (methods for hazard reduction)
Follow-up blood lead monitoring in 1-3 mo
15-19 Lead education:
Dietary
Environmental
Follow-up blood lead monitoring in 1-2 mo
Proceed according to actions for 20-24 µg/dL if:
A follow-up blood lead concentration is in this range at least 3 mo after initial venous test or
Blood lead concentration increases
20-44 Lead education:
Dietary
Environmental
Follow-up blood lead monitoring in 1 wk-1 mo (sooner if value is higher)
Complete history and physical examination
Laboratory studies:
Hemoglobin or hematocrit
Iron status
Environmental investigation
Lead hazard reduction
Neurodevelopmental monitoring
Abdominal radiography (if particulate lead ingestion is suspected) with bowel decontamination if indicated
45-69 Lead education:
Dietary
Environmental
Follow-up blood lead monitoring
Complete history and physical examination
Laboratory studies:
Hemoglobin or hematocrit
Iron status
Free erythrocyte protoporphyrin (EP) or zinc protoporphyrin (ZPP)
Environmental investigation
Lead hazard reduction
Neurodevelopmental monitoring
Abdominal radiography with bowel decontamination if indicated
Chelation therapy
≥70 Hospitalize and commence chelation therapy
Proceed according to actions for 45-69 µg/dL
NOT RECOMMENDED AT ANY BLOOD LEAD CONCENTRATION
Searching for gingival lead lines
Evaluation of renal function (except during chelation with CaNa2EDTA [ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid])
Testing of hair, teeth, or fingernails for lead
Radiographic imaging of long bones
X-ray fluorescence of long bones

From American Academy of Pediatrics: Lead exposure in children: prevention, defection, and management, Pediatrics 116:1036–1046, 2005.

Other Tools for Assessment

BLL determinations remain the gold standard for evaluating children. Techniques are available to measure lead in other tissues and body fluids. Experimentally, the method of x-ray fluorescence (XRF) allows direct and noninvasive assessment of bone lead stores. XRF methodology was used to evaluate a population that had long-term exposure to lead from a polluting battery-recycling factory. The study found that the school-aged children had elevated lead levels in bone but not in venous blood, a finding that is consistent with our understanding of the slow turnover of lead in bone, which is measurable in years, in contrast to that in blood, which is measurable in weeks. It also indicates that children may have substantial lead in their bodies that is not detected by routine blood lead testing. This stored lead may be released to toxic levels if bone resorption rates suddenly increase, as occurs with prolonged immobilization of longer than a week and during pregnancy. Thus, children with histories of elevated BLLs are potentially at risk for recrudescence of lead toxicity long after ingestion has stopped and may pass this lead to the next generation. XRF methodology is not available for clinical use in children.

Lead also can be measured in urine. Spontaneous excretion, even in children with high BLLs, is usually low. Lead excretion may be stimulated by treatment with chelating agents, and this property of these drugs forms the basis of their use as a component of lead treatment. It also has been used to develop a test that differentiates children with lead burdens responsive to chelation therapy, the lead mobilization test. In this test, a timed urine collection follows one or two doses of chelating agent and the lead content is determined. However, this test is no longer recommended.

Lead in hair also is measurable but has problems of contamination and interpretability. Further research is required before indications for hair testing are established. Other tests are used as indirect assessments of lead exposure and accumulation. Radiographs of long bones may show dense bands at the metaphyses, which may be difficult to distinguish from growth arrest lines but, if caused by lead, are indicative of months to years of exposure. For children with acute symptoms, when a BLL result is not immediately available, a kidneys-ureters-bladder (KUB) radiograph may reveal radiopaque flecks in the intestinal tract, a finding that is consistent with recent ingestion of lead-containing plaster or paint chips. The absence of radiographic findings does not rule out lead poisoning, however.

Because BLLs reflect recent ingestion or redistribution from other tissues but do not necessarily correlate with the body burden of lead or lead toxicity in an individual child, tests of lead effects also may be useful. After several weeks of lead accumulation and a BLL higher than 20 µg/dL, increases in EP values to more than 35 µg/dL may occur. An elevated EP value that cannot be attributed to iron deficiency or recent inflammatory illness is both an indicator of lead effect and a useful means of assessing the success of the treatment; the EP level will begin to fall a few weeks after successful interventions that reduce lead ingestion and increase lead excretion. Because EP is light sensitive, whole blood samples should be covered in aluminum foil (or equivalent) until analyzed.

Treatment

Once lead is in bone, it is released only slowly and is difficult to remove even with chelating agents. Because the cognitive/behavioral effects of lead may be irreversible, the main effort in treating lead poisoning is to prevent it from occurring and to prevent further ingestion by already-poisoned children. The main components in the effort to eliminate lead poisoning are universally applicable to all children (and adults), as follows: (1) identification and elimination of environmental sources of lead exposure, (2) behavioral modification to reduce nonnutritive hand-to-mouth activity, and (3) dietary counseling to ensure sufficient intake of the essential elements calcium and iron. For the small minority of children with more severe lead poisoning, drug treatment is available that enhances lead excretion.

During health maintenance visits a limited risk assessment is warranted, which includes questions pertaining to the most common sources of lead exposure: the condition of old paint, secondary occupational exposure via an adult living in the home, or proximity to an industrial source of pollution. If such a source is identified, its elimination usually requires the assistance of public health and housing agencies as well as education for the parents. The family should move out of a lead-contaminated apartment until repairs are completed. During repairs, repeated washes of surfaces and the use of high-efficiency particle accumulator (HEPA) vacuum cleaners help reduce exposure to lead-containing dust. Careful selection of a contractor who is certified to perform lead abatement work is necessary. Sloppy work can cause dissemination of lead-containing dust and chips throughout a home or building and result in further elevation of a child’s BLL. After the work is completed, dust wipe samples should be collected from floors and windowsills or wells to verify that the risk from lead has abated.

A single case of lead poisoning is often discovered in a household with multiple family members, including other young children, even in a household with a common source of exposure such as peeling lead-based paint. The mere presence of lead in an environment does not produce lead poisoning. Parental efforts at reducing the hand-to-mouth activity of the affected child are necessary to reduce the risk of lead ingestion. Handwashing effectively removes lead, but in a home with lead-containing dust, lead rapidly begins to reaccumulate on the child’s hands after washing. Therefore, handwashing is best limited to the period immediately before nutritive hand-to-mouth activity occurs.

Because there is competition between lead and essential minerals, it is reasonable to promote a healthy diet that is sufficient in calcium and iron. The recommended daily intakes of these metals vary somewhat with age. In general, for children 1 yr of age and up a calcium intake of about 1 g per day is sufficient and convenient to remember (roughly the calcium content of a quart of milk [≈1,200 mg/qt] or calcium-fortified orange juice). Calcium absorption is vitamin D–dependent; milk is vitamin D–fortified, but other nutritional sources of calcium often are not. A multivitamin containing vitamin D may be prescribed for children who do not drink sufficient milk or who have inadequate sunlight exposure. Iron requirements also vary with age, ranging from 6 mg/day for infants to 12 mg/day for adolescents. For children identified biochemically as being iron-deficient, therapeutic iron at a daily dose of 5-6 mg/kg for 3 mo is appropriate. Iron absorption is enhanced when ingested with ascorbic acid (citrus juices). Giving additional calcium or iron above the recommended daily intakes to mineral-sufficient children has not been shown to be of therapeutic benefit in the treatment of lead poisoning.

Drug treatment to remove lead is lifesaving for children with lead encephalopathy. In nonencephalopathic children, it prevents symptom progression and further toxicity. Guidelines for chelation are based on the BLL. A child with a venous BLL 45 µg/dL or higher should be treated. Four drugs are available in the USA: 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA [succimer]), CaNa2EDTA (versenate), British antilewisite (BAL [dimercaprol]), and penicillamine. DMSA and penicillamine can be given orally, whereas CaNa2EDTA and BAL can be administered only parenterally. The choice of agent is guided by the severity of the lead poisoning, the effectiveness of the drug, and the ease of administration (Table 702-6). Children with BLLs of 44-70 µg/dL may be treated with a single drug, preferably DMSA. Those with BLLs of 70 µg/dL or greater require two-drug treatment: CaNa2EDTA in combination with either DMSA or BAL for those without evidence of encephalopathy, or CaNa2EDTA and BAL for those with encephalopathy. Data on the combined treatment with CaNa2EDTA and DMSA for children with BLLs higher than 100 µg/dL are very limited.

Drug-related toxicities are minor and reversible. These include gastrointestinal distress, transient elevations in transaminases, active urinary sediment, and neutropenia. These types of events are least common for CaNa2EDTA and DMSA and more common for BAL and penicillamine. All of the drugs are effective in reducing BLLs when given in sufficient doses and for the prescribed time. These drugs also may increase lead absorption from the gut and should be administered to children in lead-free environments. Some authorities also recommend the administration of a cathartic immediately prior to or concomitant with the initiation of chelation to eliminate any lead already in the gut.

None of these agents removes all lead from the body. Within days to weeks after completion of a course of therapy the BLL rises, even in the absence of new lead ingestion. The source of this rebound in the BLL is believed to be bone. Serial examinations of bone lead content by XRF have shown that chelation with CaNa2EDTA is associated with a decline in bone lead levels but that residual bone lead remains detectable even after multiple courses of treatment.

Repeat chelation is indicated if the BLL rebounds to 45 µg/dL or higher. Children with initial BLLs higher than 70 µg/dL are likely to require more than one course. A minimum of 3 days between courses is recommended to prevent treatment-related toxicities, especially in the kidney.

The indication for chelation therapy for children with BLLs less than 45 µg/dL is less clear. Use of these drugs in children with BLLs from 20-44 µg/dL will result in transiently lowered BLLs, and in some case this lowering will be accompanied by reversal of lead-induced enzyme inhibition. However, few children increase their excretion of lead significantly during chelation, raising the question of whether any long-term benefit is achieved. A study of 2 yr old children with BLLs of 20-44 µg/dL who were randomized to receive either DMSA or placebo found that the drop in BLLs was greater in the first 6 mo after enrollment in the DMSA-treated group, but the levels converged by 1 yr of follow-up. Mean cognitive test scores obtained at 4 and 7 yr of age were not statistically different between the groups. Chelation with DMSA (and CaNa2EDTA) is not recommended for all children with BLLs from 20-44 µg/dL. Further work needs to be done to determine whether there are subgroups of children with BLLs lower than 45 µg/dL who might benefit from chelation. For example, if children are selected for chelation after demonstrating responsiveness to a test dose of a chelating agent with an enhanced lead diuresis—an indication that the drug is effective at removing lead permanently from the body—will there be better clinical/subclinical outcomes? It also remains to be demonstrated whether other chelating agents available in the USA or elsewhere are effective at either substantially reducing body stores (bone) of lead or at reversing the cognitive deficits attributable to lead at these BLLs.

With successful intervention, BLLs decline, with the greatest fall in BLL occurring in the first 2 mo after therapy is initiated. Subsequently the rate of change in BLL declines slowly so that by 6-12 mo after identification, the BLL of the average child with moderate lead poisoning (BLL >20 µg/dL) will be 50% lower. Children with more markedly elevated BLLs may take years to reach the CDC threshold of concern, 10 µg/dL, even if all sources of lead exposure have been eliminated, behavior has been modified, and nutrition has been maximized. Early screening remains the best way of avoiding and therefore obviating the need for the treatment of lead poisoning.

Bibliography

American Academy of Pediatrics. Lead exposure in children: prevention, detection, and management. Pediatrics. 2005;116:1036-1046.

Berkowitz S, Tarrago R. Acute brain herniation from lead toxicity. Pediatrics. 2006;118:2548-2551.

Binns HJ, Campbell C, Brown MJ. Interpreting and managing blood lead levels of less than 10 microg/dL in children and reducing childhood exposure to lead: recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention. Pediatrics. 2007;120:e1285-e1298.

Canfield RL, Henderson CRJr, Cory-Slechta DA, et al. Intellectual impairment in children with blood lead concentrations below 10 microg per deciliter. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1517-1526.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Lead poisoning of a child associated with use of a Cambodian amulet—New York City, 2009. MMWR. 2011;60(3):69-71.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Death of a child after ingestion of a metallic charm—Minnesota, 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55:340-341.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Deaths associated with hypocalcemia from chelation therapy—Texas, Pennsylvania and Oregon, 2003–2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55:204-206.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Lead exposure from indoor firing ranges among students on shooting teams—Alaska, 2002–2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54:577-579.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Lead poisoning associated with use of litargirio—Rhode Island, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54:227-229.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Lead poisoning associated with Ayurvedic medications—five states, 2000–2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53:582-586.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surveillance for elevated blood lead levels among children—United States, 1997–2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52:1-21.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Childhood lead poisoning associated with lead dust contamination of family vehicles and child safety seats—Maine, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:890-893.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Children with elevated blood lead levels related to home renovation, repair, and painting activities—New York State, 2006–2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:55-58.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interpreting and managing blood lead levels <10 µg/dL in children and reducing childhood exposure to lead. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56:1-16.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Childhood lead poisoning associated with Tamarind county and folk remedies. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51:684-686.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fatal pediatric lead poisoning—New Hampshire, 2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;50:457-459.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Outbreak of acute lead poisoning among children aged <5 years—Zamfara, Nigeria, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:846.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations for blood lead screening of medicaid-eligible children aged 1–5 years: an updated approach to targeting a group at high risk. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:1-13.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Notes from the field: outbreak of acute lead poisoning among children aged <5 years—Zamfara, Nigeria. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:846.

Committee on Drugs, American Academy of Pediatrics. Treatment guidelines for lead exposure in children. Pediatrics. 1995;96:155-160.

Committee on Environmental Health, American Academy of Pediatrics. Screening for elevated blood lead levels. Pediatrics. 1998;101:1072-1078.

Dietrich KN, Ware JH, Salganik M, et al. Effect of chelation therapy on the neuropsychological and behavioral development of lead-exposed children after school entry. Pediatrics. 2004;114:19-26.

Florin TA, Brent RL, Weitzman M. The need for vigilance: the persistence of lead poisoning in children. Pediatrics. 2005;115:1767-1768.

Global Lead Network. Alliance to end childhood lead poisoning. www.globalleadnet.org.

Grandjean P. Even low-dose lead exposure is hazardous. Lancet. 2010;376:855-856.

Hu H, Téllez-Rojo MM, Bellinger D, et al. Fetal lead exposure at each stage of pregnancy as a predictor of infant mental development. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1730-1735.

Jacobs DE, Nevin R. Validation of a 20-year forecast of US childhood lead poisoning: updated prospects for 2010. Environ Res. 2006;102:352-364.

Jones RL, Homa DM, Meyer PA, et al. Trends in blood lead levels and blood lead testing among US children aged 1 to 5 years, 1988–2004. Pediatrics. 2009;123:e376-e385.

Karri SK, Saper RB, Kales SN. Lead encephalopathy due to traditional medicines. Curr Drug Saf. 2008;3:54-59.

Kemper AR, Cohn LM, Fant KE, et al. Follow-up testing among children with elevated screening blood lead levels. JAMA. 2005;293:2232-2237.

Kuehn BM. CDC advises pregnancy lead screening that targets populations at risk. JAMA. 2011;305(4):347.

Lanphear BP. Childhood lead poisoning prevention. JAMA. 2005;293:2274-2276.

Laraque D, Trasande L. Lead poisoning: successes and 21st century challenges. Pediatr Rev. 2005;26:435-443.

Lin CG, Schaider LA, Brabander DJ, et al. Pediatric lead exposure from imported Indian spices and cultural powders. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e828-e835.

Lozoff B, Jimenez E, Wolf AW, et al. Higher infant blood lead levels with longer duration of breastfeeding. J Pediatr. 2009;155:663-667.

Meyer PA, Pivetz T, Dignam TA, et al. Surveillance for elevated blood lead levels among children—United States, 1997–2001. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2003;52:1-21.

Moszynski P. Mass lead poisoning in Nigeria causes “unprecedented” emergency. BMJ. 2010;341:223.

Saper RB, Phillips RS, Sehgal A, et al. Lead, mercury, and arsenic in US- and Indian-manufactured ayurvedic medicines sold via the Internet. JAMA. 2008;300:915-922.

Schnaas L, Rothenberg SJ, Flores MF, et al. Reduced intellectual development in children with prenatal lead exposure. Environ Health Perspect.. 2006;114:791-797.

Selevan SG, Rice DC, Hogan KA, et al. Blood lead concentration and delayed puberty in girls. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1527-1536.

Solon O, Riddell TJ, Quimbo SA, et al. Associations between cognitive function, blood lead concentrations, and nutrition among children in central Philippines. J Pediatr. 2008;152:237-243.

Tellez-Rojo MM, Bellinger DC, Arroyo-Quiroz C, et al. Longitudinal associations between blood lead concentrations lower than 10 microg/dL and neurobehavioral development in environmentally exposed children in Mexico City. Pediatrics. 2006;118:323-330.

Woolf AD, Goldman R, Bellinger DC. Update on the clinical management of childhood lead poisoning. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2007;54:271-294.

Woolf AD, Woolf NT. Childhood lead poisoning in 2 families associated with spices used in food preparation. Pediatrics. 2005;116:e314-e318.

Wright JP, Dietrich KN, Ris MD, et al. Association of prenatal and childhood blood lead concentrations with criminal arrests in early adulthood. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e101-266.