Lateral canthal suspension techniques

Published on 22/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Plastic Reconstructive Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3935 times

CHAPTER 30 Lateral canthal suspension techniques

History

The history of lateral canthal suspension techniques parallels the development of surgical procedures that tighten the lower eyelid to correct existing or potential lower eyelid malpositions. These techniques are therefore separated into those which address existing lower eyelid malpositions and those which prevent the development of such. Numerous surgical procedures directed to the lateral canthus have been developed to correct: (1) cicatricial, atonic or paralytic lower eyelid malpositions; (2) lateral canthal dystopia (lateral canthus lower than medial canthus); (3) epiphora; and (4) corneal exposure. Modifications of lateral canthoplasty has found wide acceptance in cosmetic surgery of the lower eyelid.

In 1826 Von Walther designed the simple lateral tarsorrhaphy procedure to connect the upper and lower eyelids laterally. This had the disadvantage of distorting the lid margins and decreasing the functional fields of vision. In 1950 and 1953 McLaughlin described a lateral tarsorrhaphy procedure that produces a more aesthetic result for non-cicatricial, paralytic lower eyelid malposition with lagophthalmos.

Lateral canthorrhaphies were developed to avoid the deformities associated with the tarsorrhaphies. These procedures were various flap transpositions with skin removal to support the lower eyelid to the upper eyelid at the lateral canthus. Denonvilliers (1856, 1863); Kuhnt-Szymanowski (1870, 1912, 1916) and Meller (1953) described procedures which were widely accepted. Modifications of these procedures were described by Smith (1959) and Kazanjian and Converse (1959) with a tarsoconjunctival wedge excised medially. Bick (1966) reported a technique removing the full thickness temporal aspect of the lower eyelid to correct laxity. Edgerton and Wolfert (1969) described a de-epithelialized dermal pennant of lateral canthal tissue that was passed through a drill hole in the lateral orbital wall to correct lower eyelid malposition. Montandon (1978) modified this procedure to include a lateral tarsorrhaphy. Lateral canthal suspensions have also been described by Whitaker (1984) via the facelift; Whitaker (1984), Ortiz-Monastario and Rodriguez (1985) from the coronal and Paterson, Munro and Farkas (1987) from the conjunctival approach. Jelks (1990, 1991, 1993, 1995) and Hinderer (1993) and Flowers (1993) described variations in bony fixation of the lower eyelid.

Many surgeons developed their own methods of creating the lateral canthal angle by various lateral canthal tendon suture techniques. The most effective methods isolated the lower lid contribution to the lateral retinaculum by a lateral canthotomy and cantholysis of the inferior limb of the lateral canthus at the bony orbital rim. The lower eyelid was thus released from the upper eyelid and retinacular structures to allow more selective repositioning. Tenzel (1969); Marsh and Edgerton (1979); Bachelor and Jobe (1980); Holt, Holt and van Kirk (1984); and Leone (1987), described the use of periosteal flaps and temporalis fascia and palmaris longus tendons for lateral canthal reconstructions.

Anderson and Gordy (1979); Hamako and Baylis (1980); Wesley and Collins (1983); Lisman and associates (1987); Jelks and associates (1997); Patipa (1999); Fagien (2002); McCord (2002); Hester (2004); and Codner (2006) have described various methods of tarsal and or inferior retinacular attachment to the bony orbital tissues that selectively tighten and reposition the lower eyelid.

Anatomy

To facilitate a thorough anatomical analysis, the eyelids and surrounding structures are divided into zones (Fig. 30.1).

The lower eyelid (Zone II) extends from the lid margin to the inferior orbital bony rim and is separated into the anterior lamella of skin and orbicularis oculi muscle, the middle lamella consisting of tarsus, orbital septum and retroseptal fat and the posterior lamella with the capsulopalpebral fascia or lower eyelid retractors and the conjunctiva (Fig. 30.2A).

The confluence of the orbital septum, orbital floor periorbita and maxillary periosteum at the inferior bony margin is termed the arcus marginalis (Fig. 30.2B). The arcus marginalis in the inferior medial orbit corresponds to the origin of the orbital portion of the orbicularis oculi muscle (Fig. 30.2C).

The orbicularis oculi muscle is innervated by the seventh cranial nerve and acts as an antagonist to the levator palpebrae superioris muscle innervated by the third cranial nerve. The orbicularis oculi muscle is divided into palpebral and orbital portions. The palpebral portion is further subdivided into pretarsal and preseptal portions. The orbital portion of the orbicularis oculi arises medially from the superiormedial orbital margin, the maxillary process of the frontal bone, the medial canthal tendon, the frontal process of the maxilla, and the inferiormedial orbital margin (Fig. 30.2C, D). The peripheral fibers sweep across the eyelid over the orbital margin in a series of concentric loops, the more central ones forming almost complete rings. In the lower eyelid, the orbital portion covers the origins of the elevator muscles of the upper lip and nasal ala and continues temporally to cover part of the origin of the masseter muscle. Occasionally, the lower orbital portion may actually continue as low as the corner of the mouth. The inferior orbital orbicularis oculi constitutes the nasojugal, cheek and malar area of the facial anatomy.

The preseptal portion diverges from its origin on the medial canthal tendon and posterior lacrimal diaphragm and passes across the lid as a series of half ellipses to meet at the lateral palpebral raphe (Fig. 30.3A). The muscle bundles are not interrupted and do not interdigitate at the raphe. The pretarsal muscles form a more superficial common lateral canthal tendon 7 mm from the lateral orbital tubercle where it inserts (Fig. 30.3B).

image

Fig. 30.3 A, The lateral palpebral raphe. B, The lateral canthal tendon and the anatomy of the structures of the lateral canthus.

From Jelks, GW, Smith, BC. Reconstruction of the eyelids and associated structures. In: McCarthy JG, ed. Plastic surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1990, p. 1671.

The medial canthus (Zone III) is a complex region containing the origins of the orbicularis oculi muscle (and the lacrimal collecting system (Fig. 30.4).

The lateral canthus (Zone IV) is an integral anatomic unit of the temporal aspects of the eyelids. The lateral canthus is more correctly termed a lateral retinaculum which consists of the lateral horn of the levator palpebrae superioris muscle, the continuation of the preseptal and pretarsal orbicularis oculi muscle as the lateral canthal tendon, the inferior suspensory ligament of the globe (Lockwood’s ligament) and the check ligaments of the lateral rectus muscle (Fig. 30.5). The lateral retinaculum structural components attach to a confluent region of the lateral orbital rim known as Whitnall’s tubercle. It is important to note that the lower eyelid lateral fat is immediately inferior to the lower eyelid contribution to the lateral canthal tendon as it inserts into the orbital tubercle confluence of the lateral retinacular structures. This portion of the lateral canthal mechanism is termed the inferior retinacular component and is the anatomical basis for the inferior retinacular lateral canthoplasty.

Technical steps

The lateral canthal procedures are performed with the surgeon at the head of the patient looking toward the feet. A focused headlight and 4× loop magnification is recommended.

Careful evaluation of the specific anatomic deformities enables the surgeon to choose the optimal lateral canthal procedure and if necessary, ancillary procedures (Tables 30.1, 30.2). The distance from the bony orbital rim to the palpebral commissure is the single most important measurement in choosing between a canthopexy or canthoplasty (Fig. 30.6B) and a dermal orbicular pennant. If the bone to soft tissue distance is less than 1 cm, tarsal strip, inferior retinacular canthopexy, or canthoplasty procedures are preferred. If the distance is greater than 1 cm (prominent globes, high myopia, thyroid orbitopathy, malar hypoplasia and negative vector relationship), a dermal orbicular pennant lateral canthoplasty is recommended.

Table 30.1 Canthoplasty techniques and indications

Canthoplasty techniques Indications
IRLCx LME I, B-STD <1 cm
IRLC

TSLC TSLC + HLS
TSLC + HLS + VSG DOPLC LME II-IV, B-STD >1 cm DOP + TSLC + HLS DOP + TSLC + HLS + VSG DOP + TSLC HLS + VSG + midface elevation/titanium screw fixation

Technique abbreviations: IRLCx, inferior retinacular lateral canthopexy; IRLC, inferior retinacular lateral canthoplasty; TSLC, tarsal strip lateral canthoplasty; HLS, horizontal lid shortening; VSG, vertical spacer graft; DOPLC, dermal-orbicular pennant lateral canthoplasty; DOP, dermal-orbicular pennant.

Indications abbreviations: LME, lid margin eversion; B-STD, bone to soft tissue distance; HLL, horizontal lid laxity; MLR, midlamellar retraction.

From Jelks GW, Jelks EB, Chiu ES. Secondary Blepharoplasty: Current Techniques. In: Mathes, ed. Plastic Surgery, Vol II, Philadelphia, Saunders 2006.

Table 30.2 Ancillary lower eyelid: reconstructive techniques

Technique Indication

From Jelks GW, Jelks EB, Chiu ES. Secondary Blepharoplasty: Current Techniques. In: Mathes, ed. Plastic Surgery, Vol II, Philadelphia, Saunders 2006.

image

Fig. 30.6 A, The lower eyelid lateral fat and the inferior retinacular lateral canthal procedures are performed through the lateral aspect of the upper eyelid blepharoplasty incision. The skin and muscle are elevated from the lateral orbit to expose the lower eyelid lateral fat. The inferior aspect of the lateral retinacular structures lies immediately superior to this fat. The lower eyelid lateral fat is removed which exposes the lateral retinaculum. Inset, after removal of the lower eyelid lateral fat, a “cave” is created inferior to the lateral retinacular structures. The illustration reveals this area as it would be visualized from inside the orbit. B, Canthoplasty procedure with lysis of the lower eyelid attachments to the lateral retinaculum. Inset, canthopexy in which the lower eyelid component of the lateral retinaculum is plicated and anchored to the lateral orbital rim periosteum. C, Both needles of a double-armed permanent suture are passed with a hitching stitch into the released inferior retinacular component of the lower eyelid and then into the periosteum of the inner aspect of the orbital rim. D, The suture is tied after the transconjunctival lower eyelid procedures are completed. The position of the suture is adjusted and tightened so the lower eyelid level covers one to two millimeters of the inferior corneal limbus.

Modified from Jelks GW, Glat PM, Jelks EB, Longaker MT. The inferior retinacular lateral canthoplasty: a new technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:1262.

Inferior retinacular lateral canthal procedure

The inferior retinacular lateral canthopexy or canthoplasty was developed for use in the primary blepharoplasty patient to help prevent lower eyelid malposition. It is helpful in correction of lower eyelid malposition associated with a negative vector relationship and mild to moderate lid margin eversion. The main advantage of the inferior retinacular canthal procedure is that it does not separate the lower eyelid from the lateral palpebral commissure. The inferior retinacular lateral canthoplasty procedure is performed through a horizontal lateral canthal incision (Fig. 30.7A) or an upper lateral eyelid incision (Fig. 30.6A).

When the upper lid blepharoplasty is performed in conjunction with lower lid blepharoplasty, the inferior edge of the lateral aspect of the upper eyelid incision is grasped and a submuscular, supraperiosteal skin and muscle flap is elevated 1–2 cm around the lateral canthus and lower eyelid. This is accomplished with a combination of fine point electrosurgical needles and blunt scissor dissection.

An insulated coated Desmarres retractor is inserted as the skin and muscle flap is elevated to expose the lateral canthal retinacular and lateral lower eyelid area. Gentle pressure on the globe produces a bulge in this area which is the excess lateral lower eyelid fat covered by orbital septum. Sharp scissors puncture the orbital septum and expose the fat. The fat is gently removed with forceps and electrocautery to the proper contour (Fig. 30.6A). In our experience, the lower eyelid lateral fat needs to be judiciously removed rather than repositioned.

When the lower eyelid lateral fat is removed, a distinct circular area is created which resembles a “hole” or “cave” from the surgeon’s perspective. The superior aspect or roof of the cave corresponds to the lateral retinacular structures of the lower eyelid inserting into the orbital tubercle of Whitnall (Fig. 30.6A, inset). This tissue is grasped with forceps and a hitching suture is passed through it. Fine point electrocautery is used to release the tissue from the lateral retinacular attachments to the orbital tubercle so the lower eyelid is easily moved superiorly and laterally. The needles are passed into the inner aspect of the orbital rim periosteum at a point corresponding to the upper level of the pupil when the eye is in primary gaze. This procedure is termed a lateral canthoplasty because it releases and repositions the lateral canthus and lower eyelid to a different position (Fig. 30.6B). The inferior retinacular tissue (roof of the “cave”) can be sutured to the lateral orbital rim periosteum without releasing it from the orbital tubercle when the clinical situation does not require significant lower eyelid and lateral canthus repositioning. This is termed a lateral canthopexy (Fig. 30.6B, inset). In both the canthopexy and the canthoplasty, the point of suture fixation is the periorbita of the inner aspect of the orbital rim at the level of the upper pupil in primary gaze (Fig. 30.6D).

The suture is a 5-0 nylon (Ethibond P-3 needle) for cosmetic blepharoplasty cases and 4-0 Polydek (Deknatel ME-2 needle) for reconstructive cases. The lateral canthoplasty is completed by tightening the suture and securing the lower lid lateral retinaculum to an elevated position inside the lateral orbital rim (Fig. 30.6D). The lower eyelid level should cover 1–2 mm of the inferior cornea and appear overcorrected. The lower eyelid settles into a lower position in 2 to 6 weeks. Symmetry of the eyelids at the completion of surgery is imperative (Fig. 30.7D).

If the fixation of the lateral retinacular tissue to the orbital periosteum is inadequate due to scarring or trauma, a local periosteal flap or fascial graft is used. Occasionally, a drill hole in the lateral orbital bone may be required for secure fixation (Fig. 30.8).

Dermal orbicular pemart lateral canthoplasty

Dermal orbicular pennant lateral canthoplasty was developed for patients with more than 1 cm distance from the lateral canthus and the bony orbit (Fig. 30.10B) and to reduce the incidence of the “beady eye” appearance and lower eyelid contour deformities caused by the tarsal strip technique. This procedure uses an extension of the lower eyelid in the form of a de-epithelialized pennant of skin and orbicularis oculi muscle (Fig. 30.9A–C). A lateral canthotomy may or may not be performed; therefore, lateral palpebral commissure deformities are reduced and shortening of the horizontal palpebral aperture does not occur (Fig. 30.12). A horizontally oriented dermal orbicular pennant of de-epithelialized skin and muscle, 0.5 cm by 1.0 cm, is incised in such a way to add an extension to the lower eyelid without cutting the lateral commissure. The pennant is completely separated from the upper eyelid pretarsal, preseptal and orbital orbicularis oculi muscle. The pennant is separated from the lower eyelid orbital and preseptal orbicularis oculi muscle, but left attached to the pretarsal orbicularis oculi muscle (Fig. 30.9C). Release of the lower eyelid by lysis of the inferior retinaculum (Fig. 30.9D) allows the lower eyelid to be elevated and tightened.

image

Fig. 30.10 Lateral bone to canthus relationship. A, This patient exhibits less than 1 cm of distance and a neutral vector. B, This patient exhibits more than 1 cm and a negative vector.

From Jelks GW, Jelks EB, Chiu ES. Secondary blepharoplasty: Current techniques. In: Mathes SJ, ed. Plastic surgery, Philadelphia: Saunders, 2006, Vol. II.

image

Fig. 30.12 A, Patient with bilateral lower eyelid malposition after blepharoplasty. B, The patient is seen 9 months after bilateral dermal-orbicular pennant lateral canthoplasties.

From Jelks GW, Jelks EB. Blepharoplasty. In: Peck GC, ed. Complications and problems in aesthetic plastic surgery. New York: Gower Medical Publishing, 1992, p. 5.

This technique is useful in postblepharoplasty patients with lower eyelid malposition, especially when there is a negative vector relationship and the soft tissue to bone distance is greater than 1 cm (see Fig. 30.10). The variable amount of orbital rim to lateral palpebral aperture distance can be managed by varying the suture placement for the canthal tightening (Fig. 30.11B).

Dermal-orbicular pennant with tarsal strip horizontal lid shortening and midface suspension

The dermal-orbicular pennant flap with or without horizontal lid shortening or vertical spacer grafts with midfacial suspension has become the preferred method of surgical correction for complex lower eyelid malpositions. This combination of techniques allows the surgeon to selectively release the lower eyelid lateral canthal attachment, correct midlamellar retractions, perform horizontal lid shortening and redrape the orbicularis oculi muscle with a midface and cheek suspension.

Patients with severe lower eyelid malposition associated with cheek and midfacial descent have often had multiple procedures resulting in deficient lower eyelid muscle and skin. The lower eyelid malposition is due to a combination of vertical restriction and horizontal laxity. The dermal orbicular pennant technique provides access for correction of the midfacial descent and lower eyelid cicatricial retraction. The tarsal strip technique provides management of the horizontal lid laxity. A tension-free lateral canthoplasty is assured by midfacial suspension with or without a titanium screw. The combined techniques do require separation of the lateral palpebral commissure (lateral canthotomy).

After elevation of the dermal-orbicular pennant (see Fig. 30.9), if horizontal lid shortening is necessary, a lateral canthotomy and inferior lid cantholysis is performed. The temporal tarsus is bared of conjunctiva, cilia, skin and muscle creating a tarsal strip which is attached to the dermal orbicular pennant. The amount of tarsal strip developed corresponds to the amount of horizontal lid shortening required. The cheek and midface is elevated from a supraperiosteal or subperiosteal plane by extending the dermal orbicular pennant incision. A titanium fixation screw with attached sutures suspends the cheek and midfacial tissue (Fig. 30.13). The place for screw insertion varies from the lateral orbital rim to the zygoma prominence (Fig. 30.14). Correction of midlamellar cicatricial vertical retraction is performed with a vertical spacer graft (auricular cartilage) that is inserted through the same incision. A separate lower eyelid incision is avoided (Fig. 30.9E).

Complications

Bleeding, infection, scar tissue, asymmetry, canthal slant are the most frequent complications and must be discussed thoroughly with the patient and family as a routine part of the informed consent process.

The transconjunctival, retroseptal lower blepharoplasty technique is associated with a decreased complication rate because the orbital septum and the pretarsal and preseptal orbicularis oculi muscle are left intact. This minimizes the risk of damage to the orbicularis oculi muscle, minimizes lower eyelid cicatricial retraction and maintains good lid tone and blink. Care must be taken to provide some type of lateral canthal support in patients with lower lid laxity, negative vector and/or scleral show. Chemosis and tear film dysfunction occur with both transcutaneous and transconjunctival blepharoplasty. These are usually transient but require treatment if there is corneal compromise. Chemosis is a milky edema of the subconjunctival tissues. It results from obstruction of the lymphatic drainage channels of the periorbital area. If the chemosis is marked or there is incarceration by the eyelids, temporary suture tarsorrhaphy may be required. Mild anti-inflammatory solutions, lid taping and ocular lubrication are also used.

Subconjunctival hemorrhage is a collection of blood between the conjunctiva and sclera. It can be a frightening experience for the patient in the early postoperative period. It is rarely dangerous and cold compresses and time result in gradual resolution. A granuloma is an elevation of granulation tissue at the edge of the conjunctival incision. It is often associated with bloody tears at three to five days postoperatively. It is gently removed by scraping with a cotton-tipped applicator or forceps after application of topical ophthalmic anesthesia.

Pearls & pitfalls

Pearls

When transconjunctival, retroseptal lower blepharoplasty is done with an upper eyelid blepharoplasty, removal of the lower eyelid lateral fat is performed, followed by inferior retinacular lateral canthal tightening.

The inferior retinacular lateral canthopexy or canthoplasty was developed for use in the primary blepharoplasty patient to help prevent lower eyelid malposition. It is helpful in correction of lower eyelid malposition associated with a negative vector relationship and mild to moderate lid margin eversion.

The main advantage of the inferior retinacular canthal procedure is that it does not separate the lower eyelid from the lateral palpebral commissure.

The lower eyelid level should cover 1–2 mm of the inferior cornea and appear overcorrected. The lower eyelid settles into a lower position in 2 to 6 weeks. Symmetry of the eyelids at the completion of surgery is imperative.

The tarsal strip procedure is useful for correction of moderate to severe lid margin eversion, paralytic ectropion and secondary correction of unrecognized horizontal lid laxity after blepharoplasty.

Dermal orbicular pennant lateral canthoplasty was developed to reduce the incidence of the “beady eye” appearance and lower eyelid contour deformities caused by the tarsal strip technique.

With the dermal orbicular pennant lateral canthoplasty a lateral canthotomy is not performed; therefore, lateral palpebral commissure deformities are reduced and shortening of the horizontal palpebral aperture does not occur.

The dermal orbicular pennant canthoplasty is useful in postblepharoplasty patients with lower eyelid malposition, especially when there is a negative vector relationship and the soft tissue to bone distance is greater than 1 cm.

The dermal-orbicular pennant flap with or without horizontal lid shortening or vertical spacer grafts with midfacial suspension has become the preferred method of surgical correction for complex lower eyelid malpositions.

Pitfalls

Further reading

Anderson R, Jordan D. The tarsal strip procedure. Arch Ophthalomol. 1979;97:2191.

DiFranceso L, Codner M, McCord C, et al. Evaluation of conventional subciliary incision used in blepharoplasty: preoperative and postoperative videography and electromyography findings. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:632.

Enzer Y, Shorr N. Medical and surgical management of chemosis after blepharoplasty. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;10:57.

Fagien S. Algorithm for canthoplasty: the lateral retinacular suspension: a simplified suture canthopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:2042.

Flowers R. Canthopexy as a routine blepharoplasty component. Clin Plast Surg. 1993;20:351.

Hirmand H., Codner M., McCord C., et al. Prominent eye: operative management in lower lid and midfacial rejuvenation and the morphologic classification system. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:620.

Honrado C, Pastorek N. Long-term results of lower-lid suspension blepharoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6:150.

Jacobs S. Prophylactic lateral canthopexy in lower blepharoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003;5:267.

Jelks G, Glat P, Jelks E, et al. The inferior retinacular lateral cathoplasty: a new technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100:1262.

Klatsky S, Iliff N, Manson P. Blepharoplasty. In: Goldwyn R, Cohen M. The unfavorable result in plastic surgery: avoidance and treatment. 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001:847–879.

Patipa M. The evaluation and management of lower eyelid retraction following cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:438.

Putterman A. Cosmetic oculoplastic surgery, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1999.

Rees T. Prevention of ectropion by horizontal shortening of the lower lid during blepharoplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 1983;11:17.

Rees TD, Aston SJ, Thorne CHM, Blepharoplasty and facialplasty, 1st edn. McCarthy JG, ed., Plastic surgery, W.B. Saunders, Philadephia, 1990;Vol. 3:2320–2414.

Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The retaining system of the face: histologic evaluation of the septal boundaries of the subcutaneous fat compartments. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(5):1804–1809.

Shorr N, Perry J. Lower blepharoplasty and midface descent. In: Chen WP, ed. Oculoplastic surgery: the essentials. 1st edn. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2001:147–165.

Spinelli HM, Jelks GW. Periocular reconstruction: a systematic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;91:1017–1024.

Zarem H, Resnick J. Expanded applications for transconjunctival lower lid blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:1041.

Zide BM, Jelks GW. Surgical anatomy of the orbit. New York: Raven Press; 1985.