Language Development and Communication Disorders

Published on 22/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Pediatrics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 4 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 2242 times

Chapter 32 Language Development and Communication Disorders

Normal Language Development

For most children, learning to communicate in their native language is a naturally acquired skill whose potential is present at birth. No specific instruction is required, although children must be exposed to a language-rich environment. Normal development of speech and language is predicated on the infant’s ability to hear, see, comprehend, and remember. Equally important are sufficient motor skills to imitate oral motor movements, and the social ability to interact with others.

For the purposes of analysis, language is subdivided into several essential components. Communication consists of a wide range of behaviors and skills. At the level of basic verbal ability, phonology refers the correct use of speech sounds to form words, semantics refers to the correct use of words, and syntax refers to the appropriate use of grammar to make sentences. At a more abstract level, verbal skills include the ability to link thoughts together in a coherent fashion and to maintain a topic of conversation. Pragmatic abilities include verbal and nonverbal skills that facilitate the exchange of ideas, including the appropriate choice of language for the situation and circumstance and the appropriate use of body language (i.e., posture, eye contact, gestures). Social pragmatic and behavioral skills also play an important role in effective interactions with communication partners (i.e., engaging, responding, and maintaining reciprocal exchanges).

It is customary to divide language skills into receptive (hearing and understanding) and expressive (talking) abilities. Language development usually follows a fairly predictable pattern and parallels general intellectual development (Table 32-1).

Table 32-1 NORMAL LANGUAGE MILESTONES

HEARING AND UNDERSTANDING TALKING
BIRTH TO 3 MONTHS

4 TO 6 MONTHS 7 MONTHS TO 1 YEAR 1 TO 2 YEARS 2 TO 3 YEARS 3 TO 4 YEARS 4 TO 5 YEARS

From American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 2005. http://professional.asha.org.

Receptive Language Development

From birth, newborns demonstrate preferential response to human voices over inanimate sounds. The infant alerts and turns toward the direction of an adult who speaks in a soft, high-pitched voice. Over the first 3 mo, infants appear to recognize their parent’s voice and quiet if crying. Between 4 and 6 mo, infants visually search for the source of sounds, again showing a preference for the human voice over other environmental sounds. By 5 mo, infants can passively follow the adult’s line of visual regard, resulting in a “joint reference” to the same objects and events in the environment. The ability to share the same experience is critical to the development of further language, social, and cognitive skills. By 8 mo, the infant can actively show, give, and point to objects. Comprehension of words often becomes apparent by 9 mo, when the infant selectively responds to his or her name and appears to comprehend the word “no.” Social games, such as “peek-a-boo,” “so big,” and waving “bye-bye” can be elicited by simply mentioning the words. At 12 mo, many children can follow a simple, one-step request without a gesture (e.g., “Give it to me!”).

Between 1 and 2 yr, comprehension of language accelerates rapidly. Toddlers can point to body parts on command, identify pictures in books when named, and respond to simple questions (e.g., “Where’s your shoe?”). The 2 yr old is able to follow a 2-step command, employing unrelated tasks (e.g., “Take off your shoes, then go sit at the table”), and can point to objects described by their use (e.g., “Give me the one we drink from”). By 3 yr, children typically understand simple “wh-” question forms (e.g., who, what, where, why). By 4 yr, most children can follow adult conversation. They can listen to a short story and answer simple questions about it. Five yr olds typically have a receptive vocabulary of over 2000 words and can follow 3- and 4-step commands.

Expressive Language Development

Cooing noises are established by 4 to 6 wk of age. Over the first 3 mo of life, parents may distinguish their infant’s different vocal sounds for pleasure, pain, fussing, tiredness, etc. Many 3 mo old infants vocalize in a reciprocal fashion with an adult to maintain a social interaction (“vocal tennis”). By 4 mo, infants begin to make bilabial (“raspberry”) sounds, and by 5 mo monosyllables and laughing are noticeable. Between 6 and 8 mo, polysyllabic babbling (“lalala” or “mamama”) is heard and the infant might begin to communicate with gestures. Between 8 and 10 mo, babbling makes a phonologic shift toward the particular sound patterns of the child’s native language (i.e., they produce more native sounds than nonnative sounds). At 9 to 10 mo, babbling becomes truncated into specific words (e.g., “mama,” or “dada”) for their parents.

Over the next several mo, infants learn 1 or 2 words for common objects and begin to imitate words presented by an adult. These words might appear to come and go from the child’s repertoire until a stable group of 10 or more words is established. The rate of acquisition of new words is approximately 1 new word per wk at 12 mo, but it accelerates to approximately 1 new word per day by 2 yr. The first words to appear are used primarily to label objects (nouns) or to ask for objects and people (requests). By 18 to 20 mo, toddlers should use a minimum of 20 words and produce jargon (strings of word-like sounds) with language-like inflection patterns (rising and falling speech patterns). This jargon usually contains some embedded true words. Spontaneous 2-word phrases (pivotal speech), consisting of the flexible juxtaposition of words with clear intention (e.g., “Want juice!” or “Me down!”), is characteristic of 2 yr olds and reflects the emergence of grammatical ability (syntax).

Two-word, combinational phrases do not usually emerge until the child has acquired 50-100 words in their lexicon. Thereafter, the acquisition of new words accelerates rapidly. As knowledge of grammar increases, there is a proportional increase in verbs, adjectives, and other words that serve to define the relation between objects and people (predicates). By 3 yr, sentence length increases and the child uses pronouns and simple present tense verb forms. These 3-5 word sentences typically have a subject and verb but lack conjunctions, articles, and complex verb forms. The Sesame Street character Cookie Monster (“Me want cookie!”) typifies the “telegraphic” nature of the 3 yr old’s sentences. By 4-5 yr, children should be able to carry on conversations using adult-like grammatical forms and use sentences that provide details (e.g., “I like to read my books”).

Variations of Normal

Language milestones have been found to be largely universal across languages and cultures, with some variations depending on the complexity of the grammatical structure of individual languages. In Italian (where verbs often occupy a prominent position at the beginning or end of sentences), 14 mo olds produce a greater proportion of verbs compared with English speaking infants. Within a given language, development usually follows a fairly predictable pattern, paralleling general cognitive development. Although the sequences are predictable, the exact timing of achievement is not. There are marked variations among normal children in the rate of development of babbling, comprehension of words, production of single words, and use of combinational forms within the first 2-3 yr of life.

Two basic patterns of language learning have been identified: “analytic” and “holistic.” The analytic pattern is the most common and reflects the mastery of increasingly larger units of language form. As reflected in the previous discussion of milestones, the child’s analytic skills proceed from simple to more complex and lengthy forms. Children who follow a holistic or gestalt learning pattern might start by using relatively large chunks of speech in familiar contexts. They might memorize familiar phrases or dialogs from movies or stories and repeat them in an over-generalized fashion. Their sentences often have a formulaic pattern, reflecting inadequate mastery of the use of grammar to flexibly and spontaneously combine words appropriately in the child’s own unique utterance. Over time, these children gradually break down the meanings of phrases and sentences into their component parts, and they learn to analyze the linguistic units of these memorized forms. As this occurs, more original speech productions emerge and the child is able to assemble thoughts in a more flexible manner. Both analytic and holistic learning processes are necessary for normal language development to occur.

Language and Communication Disorders

Etiology

Normal language ability is a complex function that is widely distributed across the brain through interconnected neural networks that are synchronized for specific activities. Early researchers in language disorders, noting what appeared to be clinical parallels between acquired aphasia in adults and childhood language disorders, expected to find similar lesions in the brains of affected children. For the most part, unilateral, focal lesions acquired in early life do not seem to have the same effects in children as in adults. Furthermore, risk factors for neurologic injury are absent in the vast majority of children with language impairment.

Genetic factors appear to play a major role in influencing how children learn to talk. Language disorders appear to cluster in families. A careful family history may identify current or past speech or language problems in up to 30% of 1st-degree relatives of proband children. Although children who are exposed to parents with language difficulty might be expected to experience poor language stimulation and inappropriate language modeling, studies of twins have shown the concordance rate for low language test score and/or a history of speech therapy to be approximately 50% in dizygotic pairs, rising to over 90% in monozygotic pairs. A number of potential gene loci have been identified, but no consistent genetic markers have been established.

The most plausible genetic mechanism involves a disruption in the timing of early prenatal neurodevelopmental events affecting migration of nerve cells from the germinal matrix to the cerebral cortex. Chromosomal lesions and point mutations of the FOXP2 gene and polymorphisms of the CNTNAP2 gene are associated with an uncommon but distinct speech and language disorder characterized by difficulties in learning and producing oral movement sequences (developmental verbal dyspraxia, childhood apraxia of speech). Affected children have a spectrum of impairment in expressive and receptive language as well as problems understanding grammar.

Pathogenesis

Language disorders are associated with a fundamental deficit in the brain’s capacity to process complex information rapidly. Simultaneous evaluation of words (semantics), sentences (syntax), prosody (tone of voice), and social cues can overtax the child’s ability to comprehend and respond appropriately in a verbal setting. Limitations in the amount of information that can be stored in verbal working memory can further limit the rate at which language information is processed. Electrophysiologic studies have shown abnormal latency in the early phase of auditory processing in children with language disorders. Neuroimaging studies have identified an array of anatomic abnormalities in regions of the brain that are central to language processing. MRI scans in children with specific language impairment (SLI) can reveal white matter lesions, white matter volume loss, ventricular enlargement, focal gray matter heterotopia within the right and left parietotemporal white matter, abnormal morphology of the inferior frontal gyrus, atypical patterns of asymmetry of language cortex, or increased thickness of the corpus callosum. Postmortem studies of children with language disorders have found evidence of atypical symmetry in the plana temporale and cortical dysplasia in the region of the sylvian fissure. Additionally, some researchers have identified a high incidence of paroxysmal EEG anomalies during sleep in children with SLI. Although these findings might represent a mild variant of the Landau-Kleffner syndrome (acquired verbal auditory agnosia), they likely represent an epiphenomenon in which paroxysmal activity is related to architectural dysplasia. In support of a genetic mechanism affecting cerebral development, a high rate of atypical perisylvian asymmetries has also been documented in the parents of children with SLI.

Classification

Each professional discipline has adopted a somewhat different classification system, based on cluster patterns of symptoms. One of the simplest classifications is the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) (Table 32-2). This system recognizes 4 types of communication disorders: expressive language disorder, mixed receptive-expressive language disorder, phonological disorder, and stuttering. In clinical practice, childhood speech and language disorders occur as a number of distinct entities.

Table 32-2 DSM-IV DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR COMMUNICATION DISORDERS

EXPRESSIVE LANGUAGE DISORDER

Coding note: If a speech-motor or sensory deficit or a neurologic condition is present, code the condition on Axis III

MIXED RECEPTIVE-EXPRESSIVE LANGUAGE DISORDER

Coding note: If a speech-motor or sensory deficit or a neurologic condition is present, code the condition on Axis III

PHONOLOGICAL DISORDER

Coding note: If a speech-motor a sensory deficit or a neurologic condition is present, code the condition on Axis III

STUTTERING

Coding note: If a speech-motor or sensory deficit or a neurologic condition is present, code the condition on Axis III

COMMUNICATION DISORDER NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED

This category is for disorders in communication that do not meet the criteria for any specific communication disorder; for example, a voice disorder (i.e., an abnormality of vocal pitch, loudness, quality, tone, or resonance)

Reprinted with permission from the Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, ed 4, Washington, DC, 1994, American Psychiatric Association, pp 58, 60–61, 63, 65.

Specific Language Impairment

Also referred to as developmental dysphasia, or developmental language disorder, SLI is characterized by a significant discrepancy between the child’s overall cognitive level (typically nonverbal measures of intelligence) and functional language level. In addition, these children follow an atypical pattern of language acquisition and use. Closer examination of the child’s skills might reveal deficits in understanding and use of word meaning (semantics) and grammar (syntax). Often, children with SLI are delayed in starting to talk. Most significantly, they usually have difficulty understanding spoken language. The problem may stem from insufficient understanding of single words or from the inability to deconstruct and analyze the meaning of sentences. Many affected children show a holistic pattern of language development, repeating memorized phrases or dialog from movies or stories (echolalia). In contrast to their difficulty with spoken language, children with SLI appear to learn visually and demonstrate their ability on nonverbal tests of intelligence.

Although they have difficulty interacting with peers who are more verbally adept, many children with SLI play appropriately with younger or older children. Despite their communication impairment, they engage in pretend play, show imagination, share emotions (affective reciprocity), and demonstrate joint referencing behaviors appropriate to their age. Of note is the high incidence of fine-motor coordination difficulty found in these children. A combination of increased joint mobility and mild muscular hypotonia often results in motor clumsiness.

Over time, children with SLI respond to therapeutic/educational interventions and show a trend toward improvement of communication skills. Adults with a history of childhood language disorder continue to show evidence of impaired language ability, even when surface features of the communication difficulty have improved considerably. This suggests that many persons find successful ways of adapting to their impairment.

Many children with SLI show difficulties with social interaction, particularly with same-aged peers. Social interaction is mediated by oral communication, and a child deficient in communication is at a distinct disadvantage in the social arena. Children with SLI tend to be more dependent on older children or adults, who can adapt their communication to match the child’s level of function. They might gravitate toward younger children who communicate at a level they can comprehend. Generally, social interaction skills are more closely correlated with language level than with nonverbal cognitive level. Using this as a guide, one usually sees a developmental progression of increasingly more sophisticated social interaction as the child’s language abilities improve. In this context, social ineptitude is not necessarily a sign of asocial distancing (e.g., autism) but rather a delay in the ability to negotiate social interactions.

Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders

A disordered pattern of language development is one of the core features of autism and other pervasive developmental disorders (Chapter 28). In fact, the language profile of children with autism is indistinguishable from that in children with SLIs. The key points of distinction between these conditions are the lack of reciprocal social relationships that characterizes children with autism, limitation in the ability to develop functional, symbolic, or pretend play, and an obsessive need for sameness and resistance to change. Approximately 75-80% of children with autism are also mentally retarded, and this can limit their ability to develop functional communication skills. Language abilities can range from absent to grammatically intact, but with limited pragmatic features and/or odd prosody patterns. Some autistic persons have highly specialized, but isolated, “savant” skills, such as calendar calculations and hyperlexia (the precocious ability to recognize written words beyond expectation based on general intellectual ability). Regression in language and social skills (autistic regression) occurs in approximately one third of children with autism, usually before 2 yr of age. No explanation for this phenomenon has been identified. Once the regression has “stabilized,” recovery of function does not usually occur (Fig. 32-1).

image

Figure 32-1 Relationship of autism, language disorders, and mental retardation.

(From Simms MD, Schum RL: Preschool children who have atypical patterns of development, Pediatr Rev 21:147–158, 2000.)

Selective Mutism

Selective mutism is defined as a failure to speak in specific social situations despite speaking in other situations, and it is typically a symptom of an underlying anxiety disorder. Children with selective mutism can speak normally in certain settings, such as within their home or when they are alone with their parents. They fail to speak in other social settings, such as at school or at other places outside their home. Other symptoms associated with selective mutism can include excessive shyness, withdrawal, dependency on parents, and oppositional behavior. Most cases of selective mutism are not the result of a single traumatic event, but rather are the manifestation of a chronic pattern of anxiety. Mutism is not passive-aggressive behavior. Mute children report that they want to speak in social settings but are afraid to do so. It is important to emphasize that the underlying anxiety disorder is the likely origin of selective mutism. Often, one or both parents of a child with selective mutism has a history of anxiety symptoms, including childhood shyness, social anxiety, or panic attacks. This suggests that the child’s anxiety represents a familial trait. For some unknown reason, the child converts the anxiety into the mute symptom. The mutism is highly functional for the child in that it reduces anxiety and protects the child from the perceived challenge of social interaction. Treatment of selective mutism should focus on reducing the general anxiety, rather than focusing only on the mute behaviors (Chapter 23). Selective mutism reflects a difficulty of social interaction and not a disorder of language processing.

Motor Speech Disorders

Hearing Impairment

Hearing loss can be a major cause of delayed or disordered language development (Chapter 629). Approximately 16-30 per 1,000 children have mild to severe hearing loss, significant enough to affect educational progress. In addition to these “hard of hearing” children, approximately another 1 per 1,000 are deaf (profound bilateral hearing loss). Hearing loss can be present at birth or acquired postnatally. Newborn screening programs can identify many forms of congenital hearing loss, but children can develop progressive hearing loss or acquire deafness after birth.

The most common types of hearing loss are due to conductive (middle ear) or sensorineural deficit. Although it is not possible to accurately predict the impact of hearing loss on a child’s language development, the type and degree of hearing loss, the age of onset, and the duration of the auditory impairment clearly play important roles. Children with significant hearing impairment often have problems developing facility with language and often have related academic difficulties. Presumably, the language impairment is caused by lack of exposure to fluent language models starting in infancy.

Approximately 30% of hearing-impaired children have at least one other disability that affects development of speech and language (e.g., mental retardation, cerebral palsy, craniofacial anomalies). Any child who shows developmental warning signs of a speech or language problem should have a hearing assessment by an audiologist and an examination by a geneticist as part of a comprehensive evaluation.

Rare Causes of Language Impairment

Screening

At each well child visit, developmental surveillance should include specific questions about normal language developmental milestones and observations of the child’s behavior. Clinical judgment, defined as eliciting and responding to parents’ concerns, can detect the majority of children with speech and language problems. Many clinicians employ standardized developmental screening questionnaires and observation checklists designed for use in a pediatrics office (Chapter 14).

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reviewed screening instruments for speech and language delays in young children that can be used in primary care settings. The Task Force focused on brief measures that require <10 minutes to complete. There was insufficient evidence that screening instruments are more effective than using physician’s clinical observations and parents’ concerns to identify children who require further evaluation. The Task Force noted that there is no single gold standard for screening, owing to inconsistent measures and terminology, and did not recommend the use of screening instruments. Furthermore, the Task Force determined that the use of formal measures was not time or cost efficient and deferred to pediatrician’s and parents’ concerns as indicators of potential problems. Table 32-3 offers guidelines for raising concerns and referring a child for specialized speech and language evaluation. Because of the high prevalence of speech and language disorders in the general population, referral to a speech-language pathologist for further evaluation should be made whenever there is a suspicion of delay.

Table 32-3 SPEECH AND LANGUAGE SCREENING

REFER FOR SPEECH-LANGUAGE EVALUATION IF:
AT AGE RECEPTIVE EXPRESSIVE
15 mo Does not look/point at 5-10 objects Is not using 3 words
18 mo Does not follow simple directions (“get your shoes”) Is not using Mama, Dad, or other names
24 mo Does not point to pictures or body parts when they are named Is not using 25 words
30 mo Does not verbally respond or nod/shake head to questions Is not using unique 2-word phrases, including noun-verb combinations
36 mo Does not understand prepositions or action words; does not follow 2-step directions Has a vocabulary <200 words; does not ask for things; echolalia to questions; language regression after attaining 2-word phrases

Diagnostic Evaluation

It is important to distinguish developmental delay (abnormal timing) from developmental disorder (abnormal patterns or sequences). A child’s language and communication skills must also be interpreted within the context of his or her overall cognitive and physical abilities. Finally, it is important to evaluate the child’s use of language to communicate with others in the broadest sense (communicative intent). Thus, a multidisciplinary evaluation is often warranted. At a minimum this should include psychologic evaluation, neurologic assessment, and speech and language examination.

Psychologic Evaluation

There are two main goals for the psychologic evaluation of a young child with a communication disorder. Nonverbal cognitive ability must be assessed to determine if the child is mentally retarded, and the child’s social behaviors must be assessed to determine whether autism or a form of PDD is present. Additional diagnostic considerations may include emotional disorders such as anxiety, depression, mood disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, academic learning disorders, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Medical Evaluation

As in any developmental disorder, careful history and physical examination should focus on the identification of potential contributors to the child’s language and communication difficulties. A family history of delay in talking, need for speech and language therapy, or academic difficulty can suggest a genetic predisposition to language disorders. Pregnancy history might reveal risk factors for prenatal developmental anomalies, such as polyhydramnios or decreased fetal movement patterns. Small size for gestational age at birth, symptoms of neonatal encephalopathy, or early and persistent oral-motor feeding difficulty may presage speech and language difficulty. Developmental history should focus on the age at which various language skills were mastered and the sequences and patterns of milestone acquisition. Regression or loss of acquired skills should raise immediate concern.

Physical examination should include measurement of height (length), weight, and head circumference. The skin should be examined for lesions consistent with phakomatosis (e.g., tuberous sclerosis, neurofibromatosis, Sturge-Weber syndrome) and other disruptions of pigment (hypomelanosis of Ito). Anomalies of the head and neck, such as white forelock and hypertelorism (Waardenberg syndrome), ear malformations (Goldenhar syndrome), facial and cardiac anomalies (Williams syndrome, velocardiofacial syndrome), retrognathism of the chin (Pierre-Robin anomaly), or cleft lip and/or palate, are associated with hearing and speech abnormalities. Neurologic examination might reveal muscular hypertonia or hypotonia, both of which can affect neuromuscular control of speech. Generalized muscular hypotonia, with increased range of motion of the joints, is commonly seen in children with SLI. The reason for this association is not clear but it might account for the fine and gross motor clumsiness often seen in these children. However, mild hypotonia is not a sufficient explanation for the impairments of expressive and receptive language.

No routine diagnostic studies are indicated for SLI or isolated language disorders. When language delay is a part of a generalized cognitive or physical disorder, referral for further genetic evaluation, chromosome testing (including high resolution banding karyotype, fragile X testing, and microarray comparative genomic hybridization), neuroimaging studies, and EEG may be considered, if clinically indicated.

Treatment

The federal IDEA laws (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) require that schools provide special education services to children who have learning difficulties. This includes children with speech and language disorders. Services are provided to children from birth through 21 yr of age. Each state has various methods for providing services, and for young children these can include Birth-to-Three, Early Childhood, and Early Learning programs. These programs provide speech-language therapy as part of public education, in conjunction with other special education resources. Children can also receive therapy from nonprofit service agencies, hospital and rehabilitation centers, and speech pathologists in private practice.

Speech-language therapy includes a variety of goals. Sometimes both speech and language activities are incorporated in therapy. The speech goals focus on development of more intelligible speech. Language goals can focus on expanding vocabulary (lexicon) and understanding of the meaning of words (semantics), improving syntax by using proper forms or learning to expand single words into sentences, and social use of language (pragmatics). Therapy can include individual sessions, group sessions, and mainstream classroom integration. Individual sessions may use drill activities for older children or play activities for younger children to target specific goals. Group sessions can include several children with similar language goals to help them practice peer communication activities and to help them bridge the gap into more naturalistic communication situations. Classroom integration might include the therapist team-teaching or consulting with the teacher to facilitate the child’s use of language in common academic situations.

For children with severe language impairment, alternative methods of communication are often included in therapy. These may include use of manual sign language, use of pictures (e.g., Picture Exchange Communication System—PECS), and computerized devices for speech output. Often the ultimate goal is to achieve better spoken language. Early use of signs or pictures can help the child to establish better functional communication and help the child to understand the symbolic nature of words to facilitate the language process. There is no evidence that use of signs or pictures interferes with development of oral language if the child has the capacity to speak. Many clinicians believe that these alternative methods accelerate the learning of language. They also reduce frustration of parents and children who cannot communicate for basic needs.

Parents can consult with their child’s speech-language therapist about home activities to enhance language development and extend therapy activities through appropriate language-stimulating activities and recreational reading. Parents’ language activities should focus on emerging communication skills that are within the child’s repertoire, rather than teaching the child new skills. The speech pathologist can guide parents on effective modeling and eliciting communication from their child.

Recreational reading focuses on expanding the child’s comprehension of language. Sometimes the child’s avoidance of reading is a sign that the parent is presenting material that is too complex for the child. The speech-language therapist can guide the parent in selecting an appropriate level of reading material.

Bibliography

Cohen NJ, Barwick MA, Horodezky NB, et al. Language, achievement, and cognitive processing in psychiatrically disturbed children with previously identified and unsuspected language impairments. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1998;39:865-877.

Cohen NJ, Davine M, Horodezky N, et al. Unsuspected language impairment in psychiatrically disturbed children: prevalence and language and behavioral characteristics. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1993;32:595-603.

De Fosse L, Hodge SM, Makris N, et al. Language-association cortex asymmetry in autism and specific language impairment. Ann Neurol. 2004;56:757-766.

Feldman HM. Evaluation and management of language and speech disorders in preschool children. Pediatr Rev. 2005;26:131-141.

Giddan JJ, Milling L, Campbell NB. Unrecognized language and speech deficits in preadolescent psychiatric inpatients. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1996;66:85-92.

Herbert MR, Kenet T. Brain abnormalities in language disorders and in autism. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2007;54:563-583.

Hill EL. A dyspraxic deficit in specific language impairment and developmental coordination disorder? Evidence from hand and arm movements. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1998;40:388-395.

Kennedy CR, McCann DC, Campbell MJ, et al. Language ability after early detection of permanent childhood hearing impairment. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2131-2140.

Nelson HD, Nygren P, Walker M, et al. Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Pediatrics. 2006;117:e298-e319.

Rapin I, Dunn M. Update on the language disorders of individuals on the autistic spectrum. Brain Dev. 2003;25:166-172.

Reilly S, Onslow M, Packman A, et al. Predicting stuttering onset by the age of 3 years: a prospective, community cohort study. Pediatrics. 2009;123:270-277.

Roberts JE, Rosenfeld RM, Zeisel SA. Otitis media and speech and language: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Pediatrics. 2004;113(3 Pt 1):e238-e248.

Schum R. Language screening in the pediatric office setting. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2007;54:425-436.

Tager-Flusberg H, Caronna E. Language disorders: autism and other pervasive developmental disorders. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2007;54:469-481.

US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: recommendation statement. Pediatrics. 2006;117:497-501.

Ward D. The aetiology and treatment of developmental stammering in childhood. Arch Dis Child. 2008;93:68-71.

32.1 Dysfluency (Stuttering, Stammering)

Fluent speech requires timely synchronization of phonatory and articulatory muscle groups. There is also an important interaction between speech and language skills. Stuttering involves involuntary frequent repetitions, lengthenings (prolongations) or arrests (blocks, pauses) of syllables, or sounds that are exacerbated by emotionally or syntactically demanding speech. The World Health Organization’s definition of stuttering is a disorder in the rhythm of speech in which the person knows precisely what he or she wishes to say but at the same time may have difficulty saying it because of an involuntary repetition, prolongation, or cessation of sound. Stuttering often leads to frustration and avoidance of speaking situations. Stuttering can lead to being bullied or teased and to speech-related anxiety and social phobia.

Diagnosis

Stuttering must be differentiated from the normal developmental dysfluency of preschool children (Tables 32-4 and 32-5). Developmental dysfluency is characterized by brief periods of stuttering that resolve by school age, and it usually involves whole words, with <10 dysfluencies per 100 words. The DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for stuttering are noted in Table 32-2. Stuttering that persists and is associated with tics may be a manifestation of Tourette’s syndrome (Chapters 23 and 590).

Table 32-4 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN STUTTERING AND DEVELOPMENTAL DYSFLUENCY

BEHAVIOR STUTTERING DEVELOPMENTAL DYSFLUENCY
Frequency of syllable repetition per word ≥2 ≤1
Tempo Faster than normal Normal
Airflow Often interrupted Rarely interrupted
Vocal tension Often apparent Absent
Frequency of prolongations per 100 words ≥2 ≤1
Duration of prolongation ≥2 sec ≤1 sec
Tension Often present Absent
Silent pauses within a word May be present Absent
Silent pauses before a speech attempt Unusually long Not marked
Silent pauses after the dysfluency May be present Absent
Articulating postures May be inappropriate Appropriate
Reaction to stress More broken words No change in dysfluency
Frustration May be present Absent
Eye contact May waver Normal

Adapted with permission from Van Riper C: The nature of stuttering, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1971, p 28. From Lawrence M, Barclay DM III: Stuttering: a brief review, Am Fam Physician 57:2175-2178, 1998.

Table 32-5 EXAMPLES OF NORMAL DYSFLUENCY IN PRESCHOOLERS

TYPE OF DYSFLUENCY EXAMPLES
Voiced repetitions Occasionally 2 word parts (mi … milk)
Single-syllable words (I … I see you)
Multisyllabic words (Barney … Barney is coming!)
Phrases (I want … I want Elmo.)
Interjections We went to the … uh … cottage.
Revisions: incomplete phrases I lost my. … Where is Daddy going?
Prologations I am Toooommy Baker.
Tense pauses Lips together, no sound produced

From Costa D, Kroll R: Stuttering: an update for physicians, CMAJ 162:1849–1855, 2000.

Treatment

Preschool children with developmental dysfluency (see Table 32-5) can be observed with parental education and reassurance. Parents should not reprimand the child or create undue anxiety. Preschool or older children with stuttering should be referred to a speech pathologist. Therapy is most effective if started during the preschool period. In addition to the risks noted in Table 32-3, indications for referral include 3 or more dysfluencies per 100 syllables (b-b-but; th-th-the; you, you, you), avoidances or escapes (pauses, head nod, blinking), discomfort or anxiety while speaking, and suspicion of an associated neurologic or psychotic disorder.

Most preschool children respond to interventions taught by speech pathologists and to behavioral feedback by parents. Parents should not yell at the child, but should calmly praise periods of fluency (“That was smooth”) or nonjudgmentally note episodes of stuttering (“That was a bit bumpy”). The child can be involved with self-correction and respond to requests (“Can you say that again?”) made by a calm parent.

Older children, adolescents, and adults have also been treated with risperidone or olanzapine with varying but usually positive results if behavioral speech therapy is unsuccessful.

Bibliography

Grizzle KL, Simms MD. Language and learning: a discussion of typical and disordered development. Curr Prob Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2009;39:168-189.

Johnson CJ, Beitchman JH, Young A, et al. Fourteen-year follow-up of children with and without speech/language impairments: speech/language stability and outcomes. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999;42:744-760.

Peterson RL, McGrath LM, Smith SD, et al. Neuropsychology and genetics of speech, language, and literacy disorders. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2007;54:543-561.

Rinaldi W. Pragmatic comprehension in secondary school-aged students with specific developmental language disorder. Int J Lang Comm Dis. 2000;35:1-29.

Sharp HM, Hillenbrand K. Speech and language development and disorders in children. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2008;55:1159-1173. viii

Shevell MI, Majnemer A, Webster RI, et al. Outcomes at school age of preschool children with developmental language impairment. Pediatr Neurol. 2005;32:264-269.

Simms MD. Language disorders in children: classification and clinical syndromes. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2007;54:437-467.

Simms MD, Schum RL. Preschool children who have atypical patterns of development. Pediatr Rev. 2000;21:147-158.

Spinath FM, Price TS, Dale PS, et al. The genetic and environmental origins of language disability and ability. Child Dev. 2004;75:445-454.

Stromswold K. The genetics of speech and language impairments. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2381-2383.

Trauner D, Wulfeck B, Tallal P, et al. Neurological and MRI profiles of children with developmental language impairment. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000;42:470-475.

Verned SC, Newbury DF, Abrahams BS, et al. A functional genetic link between distinct developmental language disorders. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2337-2345.

Webster RI, Majnemer A, Platt RW, et al. Motor function at school age in children with a preschool diagnosis of developmental language impairment. J Pediatr. 2005;146:80-85.

Webster RI, Shevell MI. Neurobiology of specific language impairment. J Child Neurol. 2004;19:471-481.

Share this: