Laboratory control of anticoagulant, thrombolytic and antiplatelet therapy

Published on 04/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine

Last modified 04/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2701 times

Chapter 20 Laboratory control of anticoagulant, thrombolytic and antiplatelet therapy

Anticoagulant and antithrombotic therapy is given in various doses to prevent formation or propagation of thrombus. Anticoagulant drugs, unlike fibrinolytic agents, have little if any effect on an already-formed thrombus. There are five main classes of drugs that require consideration:

Oral anticoagulant treatment using vitamin K antagonists

It has not yet proved possible to produce a therapeutic reduction in thrombotic tendency without increasing the risk of haemorrhage. The purpose of laboratory control is to maintain a level of hypocoagulability that effectively minimizes the combined risks of haemorrhage and thrombosis: the therapeutic range. Individual responses to oral anticoagulant treatment with vitamin K antagonists1 are extremely variable and so must be regularly and frequently controlled by laboratory tests to ensure that the anticoagulant effect remains within the therapeutic range.

Standardization of Oral Anticoagulant Treatment

Standardization of oral anticoagulant therapy comprises the following steps:

Reference thromboplastins (rabbit and bovine) are available as World Health Organization (WHO) Reference Preparations via the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) (www.nibsc.ac.uk), the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) (Irc-irmm-rm-sales@ec.europa.eu) or certified reference materials from commercial suppliers (see p. 588). All the reference preparations have been calibrated, now sometimes indirectly, against a primary WHO reference of human brain thromboplastin, which was established in 1967.4,5

The following terms are used in the calibration procedure described below:

International Sensitivity Index (ISI).4,6 This is the slope of the calibration line obtained when the PTs obtained with the reference preparation are plotted on the vertical axis of log-log paper and the PTs obtained by the test thromboplastin are plotted on the horizontal axis. The same normal and anticoagulated patients’ plasma samples are used for both sets of results.

Calibration of Thromboplastins

Principle

The test thromboplastin should be calibrated against a reference thromboplastin of the same species (rabbit versus rabbit, bovine versus bovine) although reference plasmas from different species must at some stage be compared with each other.3 All reference preparations are calibrated in terms of the primary material of human origin and have an ISI, which is assigned after a collaborative trial involving many laboratories from different countries.

Method

Carry out PT tests as described on p. 409. Allow the plasma and thromboplastin to warm up to 37°C for at least 2 min before mixing or adding CaCl2. Test each plasma in duplicate with each of the two thromboplastins in the following order with minimum delay between tests.

  Reference Thromboplastin Test Thromboplastin
Plasma 1 Test 1 Test 2
Test 4 Test 3
Plasma 2 Test 5 Test 6
Test 8 Test 7, etc.

Record the mean time for each plasma. If there is a discrepancy of more than 10% in the clotting times between duplicates, repeat the test on that plasma.

Calibration

Plot the PTs on log-log graph paper, with results using the reference preparation (y) on the vertical axis and results with the test thromboplastin (x) on the horizontal axis (Fig. 20.1). On arithmetic paper, it is necessary to plot the logarithms of the PTs (Fig. 20.2). The relationship between the two thromboplastins is determined by the slope of the line (b).

An estimate of the slope can be obtained as shown in Figures 20.1 and 20.2; this can then be used to obtain an approximation of the ISI of the test thromboplastin.

Whenever possible, however, to obtain a reliable measurement, the following more complicated calculation should be used instead.

Local Calibration of Thromboplastins

Although the ISI system has been very effective in standardizing anticoagulant control and improving agreement between laboratories, it is not perfect. One reason is that the ISI of a thromboplastin may vary according to the technique or coagulometer used and even with different models of the same instrument. To circumvent this, a system of local calibration has been suggested. In this system, a set of plasmas with an assigned INR are tested with the local thromboplastin–machine combination. These results are plotted on log-log paper against the assigned INR. The INR for subsequent patient samples can then be read off the graph using the locally measured PT.3,4 Thus, the PT is converted directly into an INR without the need for measurement of the ISI.

Calibration Audits

External quality-assurance surveys (e.g. UKNEQAS, see p. 594) will reflect differences regarding thromboplastin–machine combinations but not differences in blood sampling techniques (i.e. capillary and venous blood sampling). This can be a problem when capillary blood sampling is used in an outpatient setting, whereas venous samples are taken for inpatient anticoagulant monitoring. Regular audits comparing results from a range of patients whose blood has been sampled by both capillary and venous techniques will provide information not provided by NEQAS surveys.4,5

Determination of the International Normalized Ratio

If a local calibration scheme is not used, then it is essential to use a thromboplastin whose ISI has been determined either by the commercial supplier or (preferably) according to a local, regional or national procedure. The PT result can then be expressed as an INR. Using the INR/ISI system, the patient’s INR should be the same in any laboratory in the world. To ensure safety and uniformity of anticoagulation, the results should be reported as an INR, either alone or in parallel with the locally accepted method of reporting.

INR = prothrombin time ratio obtained using the test thromboplastin to the power of the ISI of the test reagent. The PT ratio is calculated using the patient’s test result and the geometric mean normal prothrombin time (GMNPT) from 20 normal donors: INR = (PT patient/GMNPT)ISI.

For example, a ratio of 2.5 using a thromboplastin with ISI of 1.4 can be calculated from the formula to be 2.51.4 = 3.61, which is either read from a logarithmic table or calculated on an electronic calculator.

The GMNPT is the logarithmic mean normal PT (i.e. e(ΣlnPT)/N). In this way, the level of anticoagulation in all plasma samples can be compared and a meaningful therapeutic range can be established regardless of the thromboplastin used.

Therapeutic Range and Choice of Thromboplastin

Several authorities have now published recommended therapeutic ranges denoting the appropriate degree of anticoagulation in different clinical circumstances.7,8 These are largely based on controlled clinical trials but to some extent also represent a consensus on practice that has emerged over many years.

The choice of thromboplastin largely determines the accuracy with which anticoagulant control can be maintained. If the ISI of the thromboplastin is high, then a small change in PT represents a large change in the degree of anticoagulation. This affects the precision of the analysis and the coefficient of variation for the test increases with the ISI. Moreover, the target prothrombin ratio range becomes very small for any given range of INR. This is illustrated in Figure 20.3 and Table 20.1. For these reasons, it is strongly recommended that a thromboplastin with a low ISI (i.e. close to 1) is used.

image

Figure 20.3 The ratios obtained with thromboplastins with given ISI values equivalent to INR therapeutic range of 2.0–4.5.

(Slightly modified, from Poller L 1987 Oral anticoagulant therapy. In: Bloom AL, Thomas DP (eds) Haemostasis and Thrombosis, 2nd edition. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, with permission.)

Table 20.1 Therapeutic ranges equivalent to an INR of 2.0–4.0 using different commercial thromboplastins

Thromboplastin ISI Ratios equivalent to INR 2.0–4.0
Thrombotest 1.03 2.0–3.8
Thromborel 1.23 1.7–3.1
Dade FS 1.35 1.65–2.8
Simplastin 2.0 1.3–2.0
Boehringer 2.1 1.35–1.9
Ortho 2.3 1.3–1.8

ISI, International Sensitivity Index; INR, International Normalized Ratio.

(Modified from Poller L 1987 Oral anticoagulant therapy. In: Bloom AL, Thomas DP (eds) Haemostasis and Thrombosis, p. 870, 2nd edition. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.)

Management of Overanticoagulation

The approach to management of a patient whose INR exceeds the therapeutic range with or without bleeding is shown in Table 20.2.7

Table 20.2 Recommendations for management of bleeding and excessive anticoagulation7

3.0<INR<6.0 (target INR 2.5) 1. Reduce warfarin dose or stop
4.0<INR<6.0 (target INR 3.5) 2. Restart warfarin when INR <5.0
6.0<INR<8.0
No bleeding or minor bleeding
1. Stop warfarin
2. Restart when INR <5.0
INR <8.0
No bleeding or minor bleeding
1. Stop warfarin
2. Restart warfarin when INR <5.0
3. If other risk factors for bleeding give 0.5–2.5 mg of vitamin K (oral or i.v.)
Major bleeding 1. Stop warfarin
2. Give PCC
30–50 u/kg or FFP 15 ml/kg if PCC not available
3. Give 5 mg of vitamin K (i.v.)

FFP, fresh-frozen plasma; INR, International Normalized Ratio; PCC, prothrombin complex concentrate.

Point-of-Care Testing

Buy Membership for Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Category to continue reading. Learn more here