Joint Disorders

Published on 10/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Emergency Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1956 times

107 Joint Disorders

image      Key Points

A white blood cell count higher than 50,000/mm3 is suggestive of a septic joint; however, lower counts do not rule out this diagnosis. If the index of clinical suspicion for a septic joint is high but the test results are nondiagnostic, the disorder should be treated as an infection.

Severely painful acute monarticular arthritis, with or without fever, is highly likely to be a septic joint; it is an emergency requiring parenteral antibiotics and possible surgical intervention.

Joint prostheses, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, concurrent infection, and age older than 80 years are significant risk factors for bacterial joint infections. Acute problems in a prosthetic joint merit immediate discussion with an orthopedic surgeon.

A sexually active young adult with an inflamed, painful joint is considered to have gonococcal arthritis until proved otherwise and should be treated accordingly.

Gout and pseudogout are crystal-induced arthritides that although benign, may cause significant pain and morbidity. The patient’s pain can be significantly improved by anesthetic and steroid injection after arthrocentesis.

Overlying soft tissue infection may preclude arthrocentesis or warrant a different approach.

Syncope may be a warning of high risk for sudden cardiac death in patients with systemic inflammatory arthritides.

Cervical spine disease is common with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis and must be considered before any attempt at endotracheal intubation that involves forced flexion.

Serious complications of arthritides are rare but may be life- or limb-threatening.

Arthritis

Pathophysiology

The structure of diarthrodial joints (the most common type) includes the synovium, synovial fluid, articular cartilage, intraarticular ligaments, joint capsule, and juxtaarticular subchondral bone. The delicate synovium provides oxygen and nutrients to cartilage and produces lubricants. Articular cartilage deforms under mechanical load to minimize stress and provides a smooth surface for joint motion with minimal friction. Causes of joint disorders (Box 107.1) often overlap. Cumulative microdamage and remodeling occur with use and aging. Mechanical or metabolic disturbances may lead to a secondary inflammatory response, or an inflamed structure (e.g., a tendon) may rupture. Arthrosis is due to a mechanical insult, whereas arthritis is due to inflammation of the synovium. With inflammation comes white blood cell (WBC) infiltration, release of cytokines (e.g., tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α], interleukins) and other inflammatory mediators, and proliferation of cells or tissue. Edema collects around the joint, which causes stiffness. With prolonged inflammation, erosion of bone and destruction of the joint eventually occur and can produce deformity and chronic disability.

In addition to bone, muscles, and joints, “joint” pain may derive from nerves, skin, or periarticular structures (ligaments, tendons, bursae, bone). The enthesis is the structural insertion of tendon or ligament into bone. Inflammatory enthesitis is prominent in the spondyloarthropathies, such as reactive arthritis.

Presenting Signs and Symptoms

The clinical findings can narrow the potential cause of a patient’s symptoms (Table 107.1). Initial assessment must determine whether the anatomic site of the problem is the joint and then a general category of the disease, either inflammatory (septic versus aseptic) or noninflammatory (mechanical). A red, hot, swollen, painful joint is the classic finding with septic and other inflammatory arthritides. Arthritis patients may also have serious nonarticular complications of their disease or its treatment.

The onset and pattern of pain are important to determine (Box 107.2). Mechanical pain is worse with use, rapidly relieved with rest, and often least in the morning. If present, morning stiffness resolves quickly. Rapid onset over a period of minutes suggests trauma, internal derangement, or a loose fragment in the joint. Inflammatory pain is often worse with use as well, but not so quickly relieved with rest, and is commonly associated with morning stiffness (short duration with OA, prolonged with RA). “Gelling” (stiffness and immobility) after sitting in one position occurs with either type. Widespread pain with stiffness is typically due to inflammatory arthritis or fibromyalgia. Subjective pain without joint findings on examination is termed arthralgia. If the patient has tried medications without relief, the dosage should be determined because inadequate dosing is common.

Although pain is usually the main concern of patients with joint disease, it is important to determine whether other associated symptoms (e.g., fever, rash, eye symptoms) or findings are present that can aid in the diagnosis. For example, examination of the skin may reveal the malar or butterfly facial rash associated with lupus, the pustular lesions of gonococcemia, or the subcutaneous nodules of RA and gout.

The musculoskeletal examination attempts to identify the exact site of the problem—joint versus bone, muscle, periarticular, or superficial skin pain. Particular joint involvement may aid in making the diagnosis (Box 107.3). True joint pain is usually diffuse on palpation and increases with active and passive motion. Periarticular inflammation (tendonitis, bursitis, cellulitis) is generally more focal, with pain reproduced only by certain movements—most often resisted active contraction or passive stretching of the involved muscles or tendons and usually only toward one side.

Differential Diagnosis and Medical Decision Making

Mechanical, inflammatory, or metabolic causes of arthritis may be present, and the whole picture must be considered in narrowing the lengthy differential diagnosis (Box 107.4). A new diagnosis of a specific type of inflammatory arthritis may not be possible in one visit, but recognition that the case is inflammatory is important for interim care. The severity of a patient’s discomfort will determine the urgency of analgesia, which may be initiated well before refining the list of possible diagnoses.

Box 107.4 Differential Diagnoses for Acute Arthritis

Early identification of septic arthritis is a top priority. An infected joint is especially likely to be present in patients with inflammatory, acute monarticular arthritis, with or without fever. The presence of another site of infection (skin, lungs, urine, heart) or a joint prosthesis increases the likelihood considerably. Moderate fever is typical with a septic joint, whereas low-grade fever may be present with any inflammatory arthritis. Treatment (antibiotics and drainage) must be initiated empirically while awaiting culture results. Infections in nearby sites (bursae, skin, periosteum) should be distinguishable by careful examination and radiologic studies; ultrasonography may be very helpful in looking for joint effusions. High fever, chills, and signs of sepsis should prompt fluid resuscitation as needed and studies to identify any additional site of infection.

Although patients usually have a history of trauma or very sudden monarticular pain, fractures may occasionally be surprises, especially in those with severe osteopenia or altered mentation (e.g., alcohol abuse, seizures), in whom trauma might not have been noticed.

Signs and symptoms may overlap, but crystals found on arthrocentesis are diagnostic of crystal-induced arthritis. The recent addition of a medication that can cause hyperuricemia may be a clue, but serum uric acid levels alone do not make or rule out the diagnosis of gout. Frequently, the patient has had multiple bouts of gout in the same joint, most commonly the great toe.

Diagnostic Studies

Blood tests are rarely diagnostic in patients with synovial disorders but may be ordered sparingly to assist in management decisions. A complete blood count (CBC) and basic chemistry profile will identify anemia, an elevated WBC count, and renal dysfunction (which affects selection of medications). The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are nonspecific but useful markers of inflammation. Coagulation studies are needed only if a patient is taking anticoagulants or a bleeding disorder is suspected. Creatine phosphokinase is helpful if muscle pain or weakness is detected. If clinical assessment raises concern for other autoimmune or systemic diseases, additional screening for multiorgan involvement with urinalysis, liver enzymes, electrocardiogram, and chest films may help. Serologic testing (e.g., rheumatoid factor [RF], antinuclear antibody, and Lyme serology, depending on the clinical impression) is generally done in follow-up settings.2

Plain radiographs are ordered if a fracture, foreign body, septic joint, or tumor is suspected. If the initial films show no fracture but suspicion remains, films repeated in 1 to 2 weeks may show callus formation or abnormal alignment. Radiographic findings may also assist in diagnosing the type of arthritis (Box 107.5),3 although they may remain normal early in the course. The presence of degenerative changes in a painful joint supports the clinical suspicion of OA as the cause, but such changes also become common with age, even in asymptomatic joints; conversely, a normal film does not rule out OA. Similarly, calcified fibrocartilage is often found in patients with calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) disease but is common in asymptomatic patients as well. Ultrasonography is useful in confirming joint effusion, especially in joints that are difficult to assess, such as the hip. Other modalities are rarely indicated in the emergency department (ED). Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can distinguish synovitis from effusion and identify rotator cuff tears or be used to evaluate ligament trauma, emergency MRI or computed tomography (CT) is indicated only if a severe joint complication is strongly suspected or if axial skeletal pain merits evaluation for stenosis or metastatic disease.

Arthrocentesis with synovial fluid analysis is an important diagnostic and therapeutic procedure for joint disease (see the Tips and Tricks box and Box 107.6). It is the only reliable means to rule out a septic joint, and it is essential in acute monarthritis to look for joint infection, crystals, or hemarthrosis. Possible complications of arthrocentesis include introduction of infection into the joint space, hemarthrosis, and adverse reactions to medications. Arthrocentesis of prosthetic joints is best done with orthopedic consultation.

Tips and Tricks

Joint Fluid Collection

Identify and mark landmarks before infiltration with an anesthetic.

Preprocedure use of an ice pack will decrease pain.

Support the joint in a position of comfort during and after the procedure.

Contact the laboratory technicians before collecting the fluid to verify the following:

Use sonographic localization of joint fluid.

Prepare the area thoroughly with the antiseptic of choice. Use sterile gloves and equipment.

Use an 18- to 22-gauge needle depending on the size of the joint; smaller needles may not be sufficient to collect joint fluid.

Attachment of extension tubing between the needle hub and the syringe helps decrease movement of the needle in the joint space and makes changing syringes with large-volume arthrocentesis and injection of medications into the joint space easier. Tubing must be flushed when injecting corticosteroids so that the full dose actually enters the joint space.

Collect enough fluid for appropriate testing (this is not an easily repeated procedure).

Send fluid for a cell count and differential, Gram stain and culture, crystals, glucose, and viscosity.

Seeding the fluid into blood culture flasks immediately after aspiration may increase the yield.

Have the patient rest the joint for 12 to 24 hours after the injection of corticosteroids.

Normal synovial fluid is clear and yellow in appearance. In degenerative joint disease the fluid itself is normal and thus remains clear. Bloody fluid suggests hemarthrosis. Fat droplets may confirm a fracture. Turbid fluid is observed in inflammatory conditions: gout, pseudogout, and septic, rheumatoid and seronegative arthritides (Table 107.2).

Crystal analysis is performed under compensated polarizing microscopy. In patients with acute gout, monosodium urate crystals are present inside neutrophils in fluid from the affected joint. The crystals are typically needle shaped and appear yellow when parallel to the compensator; this is negative birefringence. Sensitivity is at least 85%, and specificity for gout is 100%.4 In pseudogout, the crystals are positively birefringent (blue when parallel to the compensator), usually rhomboid shaped, and also phagocytized by neutrophils. Acute gouty arthritis may occasionally coexist with septic arthritis or pseudogout.

Glucose may be decreased relative to serum glucose in severe inflammatory disorders: down to less than 50% of the serum glucose level in septic arthritis and 50% to 75% in rheumatoid and seronegative arthritides. However, evidence suggests that chemistry studies on joint fluid should be discouraged because their results may be misleading or redundant.5

Viscosity can be measured grossly in the laboratory and ED. Inflammation decreases the hyaluronate portion of synovial fluid, and thus viscosity decreases. When dropped from a syringe, normal synovial fluid makes a 5- to 10-cm string of fluid before dropping. With inflammation, the string of fluid will be shorter or the fluid may simply form droplets.

Although a joint WBC count higher than 50,000/mm3 is generally said to be positive for infection, septic arthritis can occur with lower joint WBC counts, especially early in infection (36% of patients with septic arthritis had joint WBC counts lower than 50,000/mm3).6 In addition, patients with inflammatory arthritides such as RA, gout, and pseudogout may have very high joint WBC counts. Thus fluid must also be sent for Gram stain and culture. The yield is increased by immediate plating in the laboratory and perhaps by inoculating blood culture bottles with joint fluid in the ED. The serum WBC count, ESR, and joint WBC count are extremely variable in adults with septic arthritis.7 In the absence of a positive Gram stain, the ED clinician must consider the whole picture when determining the probability of septic arthritis.

Treatment

ED care focuses on early relief of pain, typically with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as ibuprofen (800 mg orally) or acetaminophen (1 g orally) (or both), ice, and limb support in a position of comfort (usually partial flexion). If the pain is severe or unrelieved by initial analgesia, tramadol or narcotic analgesics are used, and the joint may be immobilized with an elastic bandage, splint, or brace. “Buddy taping” to the adjacent digit helps relieve the pain in finger joints.

Removal of fluid from a joint effusion provides considerable relief. Intraarticular corticosteroids (e.g., triamcinolone hexacetonide, ranging from 5 mg in a finger joint to 40 mg in a large joint, or methylprednisolone, 2 to 5 mg in small joints and 10 to 25 mg in large joints) are recommended for effusions unless infection is suspected. The patient should be informed that the pain relief with corticosteroids typically begins in 1 to 2 days, peaks at about 1 week, and lasts for 1 week to a few months, during which time compliance with adjunctive measures helps prevent recurrence. Although minimal evidence supports the concern, repeated steroid use traditionally raises concern over cartilage damage, so use in the same joint is limited to every 3 to 4 months. Long-acting local anesthetic may be added to the injection for same-day short-term relief.8,9

If suspicion for an infected joint is high, intravenous antibiotics are administered after appropriate material is sent for culture (see discussion later under “Septic Arthritis”).

Follow-up, Next Steps in Care, and Patient Education

Serious situations may warrant admission (Box 107.7). Patients with joint infections require admission and early consultation with an orthopedic surgeon or rheumatologist.

Box 107.7 Emergency Department Disposition Decisions

Most other patients will be discharged home with an analgesic and general treatment measures to relieve pain. Full-dose acetaminophen (650 to 1000 mg four times daily) may be adequate (especially if a history such as gastrointestinal [GI] bleeding, heart failure, or renal failure makes use of an NSAID risky), or an NSAID may be selected based on low cost and safety profile (e.g., celecoxib may be safer for the stomach). The NSAID is begun at a high dose (e.g., ibuprofen, 600 to 800 mg three times daily), continued for at least 2 to 3 days (or with inflammatory arthritis, for at least a few days after the pain stops), and then may be continued as needed. The patient is advised to take NSAIDs with food, especially with a history of stomach upset, and cotreatment with a stomach-protective drug (H2 blocker, proton pump inhibitor, or sucralfate [Carafate]) should be considered. Nonresponders may be switched to a different NSAID, often with good relief, or may be given concomitant acetaminophen or tramadol. Judicious short-term use of narcotic analgesics is also helpful.

Topical analgesics may help, especially if only a single joint is problematic. Topical NSAIDs (diclofenac or ketoprofen, but not salicylates) and capsaicin (thin film of 0.025% cream applied four times per day) have been shown in trials to be beneficial, but maximal relief may take 3 to 4 weeks. Topical NSAIDs avoid the GI and renal complications of oral agents.10,11 Lidocaine patches are another option, although unstudied.

General treatment measures should be recommended, including ice packs or heat (or both), temporary support (elastic wrap; brace, cane, or walker) and joint rest, but unnecessary or prolonged immobilization should be avoided. Patient education should include simple measures to avoid repetitive injury (e.g., patients with shoulder pain often ignore the obvious trigger of carrying a heavy shoulder bag). Simple splinting or ergonomic advice may assist patients with pain related to repetitive motions when the activity is unavoidable.

Appropriate lifestyle recommendations for patients with chronic arthritis are to stay as active as possible with daily activities and reasonable exercise programs. Physical and occupational therapy12 may contribute greatly to improved quality of life and ability to maintain independence in self-care but are usually arranged by the continuity physician. Initial range-of-motion (ROM) and later strengthening and aerobic exercise regimens are recommended; swimming pool exercise programs are quite helpful. Obese patients with lower extremity arthritis should be educated about the importance of weight reduction.

Follow-up care includes referral to a primary care physician for most patients. Rheumatology referral is recommended for patients with clinical suspicion of new inflammatory or autoimmune arthritides such as RA or for patients not improving despite adequate general care. Chronic severe pain with significant disability merits orthopedic referral. Patient education is vital for achieving an optimal outcome (see the Patient Teaching Tips box).

image Patient Teaching Tips

At Discharge

Instruct patients to return to the emergency department (ED) for temperatures higher than 101° F or if the redness or swelling spreads; also state specific problems to watch out for—for example, patients given nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs should “stop the medicine and come to the ED if you have black or bloody stools.”

Educate patients about their specific condition. Examples of teaching points include the following:

Understanding plus compliance with the recommended medication dose and directions is important for a good outcome. Patients with inflammatory arthritis may benefit from continuing the antiinflammatory medications even after the pain improves.

Follow-up visits are important for a good outcome:

Preprinted discharge instructions and disease education pamphlets are helpful, especially if notes are added to adapt them to the specific needs of individual patients. Additional information is available at sites such as www.arthritisfoundation.org.

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Presenting Signs and Symptoms

RA is characterized by symmetric polyarthritis persisting for more than 6 weeks, prolonged morning stiffness (>30 minutes), and systemic symptoms of fatigue, malaise, and weight loss. Diagnostic criteria are listed in Table 107.3.14 Arthritis typically starts in the small joints (metacarpophalangeal [MCP], metatarsophalangeal [MTP], and proximal interphalangeal [PIP] joints of the hands and feet but not the distal interphalangeal [DIP] joints) and later affects larger extremity joints. Migratory polyarthralgia occurs, and the symptoms may wax and wane. The onset of RA is typically insidious but can be abrupt. Cervical spine involvement is prevalent, although the rest of the spine is usually spared. RA increases the risk for a septic joint or tendon rupture, and temporomandibular joint (TMF) problems are common.

Table 107.3 2010 American College of Rheumatology Revised Criteria for the Classification of Rheumatoid Arthritis*

FINDING POINTS
A. Joint Involvement
1 large joint 0
2-10 large joints 1
1-3 small joints (with or without the involvement of large joints) 2
4-10 small joints (with or without the involvement of large joints) 3
>10 joints (at least 1 small joint) 5
B. Serology (at Least 1 Test Result Is Needed for Classification)
Negative RF and negative ACPA 0
Low positive RF or low positive ACPA 2
High positive RF or high positive ACPA 3
C. Acute Phase Reactants (at Least 1 Test Result Is Needed for Classification)
Normal CRP and normal ESR 0
Abnormal CRP or abnormal ESR 1
D. Duration of Symptoms
<6 wk 0
≥6 wk 1

ACPA, Anti–citrullinated protein antibody; CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; RF, rheumatoid factor IgM.

* Score-based algorithm: Add the scores of categories A to D; a score of 6 or higher of a total of 10 is needed for to classify a patient as having definite RA.

Adapted from Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:1580-1588.

See Table 107.3, 2010 American College of Rheumatology Revised Criteria for the Classification of Rheumatoid Arthritis, online at www.expertconsult.com

Examination in the early stages usually finds tenderness, swelling, and limited ROM in at least three joints, especially in the hands and feet.15 Warmth and erythema are uncommon. Palpation may reveal loss of the normal contour across joints (especially the MCP joints) because of pannus. Rheumatoid nodules are found in 20% of patients and can appear anywhere but especially over bony prominences, pressure points, and tendon sheaths. These nodules may be fixed or mobile with a rubbery or granular texture and are sometimes indistinguishable from gouty tophi. They are not a serious problem unless they occur in the vocal cords or cardiac conduction tissue. Typical later joint deformities are radial deviation at the wrist (usually the earliest deformity), ulnar deviation at the MCP joints (the most characteristic deformity of RA), swan neck or boutonnière deformities of the fingers, cock-up toes, loss of arches, and hallux valgus.

Extraarticular manifestations are common. Acutely life-threatening complications are rare but disastrous. Patients may also have serious complications of chronic treatment, particularly with infections from immunosuppression.

Differential Diagnosis and Medical Decision Making

Identification of septic arthritis is the top priority given its risk for rapid joint destruction or systemic infection. Patients with known RA are at significantly increased risk, and clinical findings may be more subtle because of their drug regimens. Joint fluid analysis is essential. Systemic infections may seed a joint or induce an immunologic arthritis; mild systemic symptoms may be difficult to distinguish from those of exacerbation of RA.

OA is the most common consideration in the differential diagnosis, but its pattern of joint involvement (especially in the hands) and minimal to absent systemic symptoms distinguish it from RA. Self-limited arthritic syndromes (e.g., viral infections, Lyme disease) can be difficult to distinguish clinically from the initial findings in patients with RA, and thus the RA criteria require persistence of the joint symptoms for longer than 6 weeks. The usual time from onset to diagnosis of RA is 6 to 12 months, but joint damage occurs early, with 30% of patients exhibiting bone erosion at time of diagnosis.

Studies may assist in the differential diagnosis. RA typically produces a mild normochromic normocytic anemia and thrombocytosis but normal WBC count (unless infected or Felty syndrome is present), an ESR of 30 to 60 mm/hr, and an elevated CRP level. On plain films, RA is characteristically associated with joint space narrowing (especially in the MCP, PIP, and wrist joints), marginal bony erosions, periarticular osteopenia, and soft tissue swelling (Fig. 107.1). Joint destruction (e.g., femoral head protruding through the acetabulum) occurs late.

Serologic testing (RF IgM or anti–citrullinated protein antibody [ACPA]) for a new diagnosis is generally best done in the follow-up setting. False positives and negatives occur, so the results must always be interpreted in the clinical context. Although a positive RF titer (>1 : 80) develops in 85% of patients with RA in the first year of the disease, unfortunately half are negative for the first 6 months, just when early intervention is most effective. RF is frequently positive in other settings, such as subacute bacterial endocarditis and rheumatic fever, and is present in low titer in 20% of elderly patients without disease. ACPA testing is newer, becomes positive earlier, but is not as widely available as RF.16

Follow-up, Next Steps in Care, and Patient Education

The majority of RA patients will be discharged (see Box 107.7). Immunosuppressed patients warrant high suspicion for infection and a low threshold for admission. Follow-up visits with either a primary care physician or rheumatologist (if a new diagnosis or not responding to treatment) are essential. Chronic severe joint dysfunction merits orthopedic referral for potential surgical intervention (joint replacement, arthrodesis, synovectomy).

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDS) are essential for all RA patients to prevent joint damage17,18 and are now initiated as early as possible after diagnosis (but not in the ED). The mainstay remains methotrexate, alone or in combination.19 Leflunomide (an immunomodulatory drug) and sulfasalazine are alternatives.20 Exciting new and effective biologic agents include anticytokine therapies such as etanercept, anakinra, abatacept, and rituximab.21

Osteoarthritis

Presenting Signs and Symptoms

OA most commonly affects the knees, hips, spine, fingers (especially the DIP joints and first carpometacarpal joint), and toes (especially the MTP joints). ED visits are usually prompted by significant pain in a large joint (knees or hips) that is often associated with an acute but minor injury. Neck or back pain is also common. Patients typically report a gradual onset of pain and stiffness in one or a few joints with limited ROM. Locking or instability of the knee is common, as is joint effusion. Baseline pain is mild to moderate, worse with use, and rapidly better with rest, and the symptoms are worse in damp, cool weather.

On examination, disease is found to be limited to the symptomatic joints. Joint tenderness, bone enlargement, and crepitus on joint motion are common findings. Heberden nodes (hard nodules on the dorsal aspect of the DIP joints) are commonly seen in older women with OA. Malalignment is found in about half of knees with OA, typically with a varus (bowleg) deformity and often with instability on excess ROM. Joints may be mildly warm, especially if an effusion is present, but not dramatically inflamed. Late in the disease course, significant joint disability is evident (Fig. 107.2).

Follow-up, Next Steps in Care, and Admission

As with other arthritides, the vast majority of patients with OA are discharged home with recommendations for primary care follow-up, whereas those with known or strongly suspected joint infection are treated and admitted to the hospital. Several options are available for discharge analgesia.24,25 Patients with mild symptoms may need only general care measures. Acetaminophen and NSAIDs are the first-line choices. In studies both have been shown to be effective in reducing pain, although NSAIDs or celecoxib is modestly better. However, acetaminophen has less risk for side effects and thus remains a good first choice. Effective additions or alternatives include tramadol or short-term use of narcotics.

Topical NSAIDs (not salicylates) are considered core treatment of OA of the knee or hands, and topical capsaicin is considered adjunctive to core treatment of these joints; strong evidence supports their benefits.10,11 Glucosamine sulfate (1500 mg/day) and chondroitin sulfate (1200 mg/day) may shift cartilage metabolism toward a positive balance and are widely popular among patients, but the overall evidence to date shows limited efficacy26,27; these over-the-counter preparations may vary considerably in composition.

General care measures and patient education are also important (see the Patient Teaching Tips box presented earlier and Box 107.8).28 Evidence supports the benefit of exercise regimens and weight loss in patients with knee arthritis. Correction of knee malalignment with a neoprene sleeve, valgus brace, orthotics, or a combination of such devices is beneficial.29 Evidence on the benefit of acupuncture is mixed.30 Surgical interventions are useful in selected situations; knee arthroscopy is beneficial if cartilage flaps, loose bodies, or meniscal disruption is causing mechanical locking or instability. Total joint replacement for knee or hip OA often dramatically improves severe refractory pain and disability, particularly if the patient has a relatively low body mass index. Chondrocyte transplantation is an exciting intervention for future care.

Box 107.8 General Treatment Measures for Chronic Arthritis

Reactive Arthritis

Presenting Signs and Symptoms

Cases of reactive arthritis seen in the ED are likely to be a new diagnoses. Typically, the patient reports one or a few sites of acute joint pain, often asymmetric and with sequential onset. Common sites include large joints (one or both ankles, wrists, knees) and small joints in the feet; the upper extremities may be involved later. Fever (up to 102.2° F [39° C]), constitutional symptoms (fatigue, malaise, weight loss), and mucosal problems are common findings (Box 107.9). Low back pain, back stiffness, or sacroiliitis occurs in half the patients.31 The involved joints are often inflamed. The classic triad that was formerly named Reiter syndrome includes acute peripheral arthritis (asymmetric, oligoarticular, additive), conjunctivitis (mild, usually several days before the appearance of joint pain), and nongonococcal urethritis or cervicitis (generally mild, precedes the joint pain).

Most patients do not manifest the full triad. Some may not volunteer information about other symptoms before their joint pain or about recent diarrheal or GU infections.

Later complications can include ankylosing spondylitis, uveitis, and cardiac involvement (in about 10% of patients) with conduction blocks, nonspecific ST-segment changes, Q waves, or aortic regurgitation.

Treatment

Full-dose NSAIDs are the mainstay of therapy for reactive arthritis—a good response is typical.32 General care measures are also appropriate (see earlier), especially encouragement of continuing exercise. Systemic corticosteroid therapy is not generally indicated, but intraarticular glucocorticoids may help in alleviating persistently problematic joints after ruling out infection. Second-line medications for nonresponders include sulfasalazine or methotrexate. Experience with anti-TNF agents is limited but promising.

Antibiotic treatment of Chlamydia is appropriate if the initial infection was untreated or is found on testing. Empiric administration of an antibiotic to patients with a previous history of GI infection is not useful unless current stool cultures show persistence of a pathogenic trigger.

Septic Arthritis

Epidemiology

The incidence (expressed per 100,000 per year) of septic arthritis varies between 2 and 5 in the general population, 5 and 12 in children, 28 and 38 in patients with RA, and 40 and 68 in patients with joint prostheses. Males are usually affected more commonly than females, although with underlying RA, females are affected more often. About 10% of patients with acutely painful joints will have septic arthritis.1

The organisms causing bacterial arthritis depend on the epidemiologic circumstances (Table 107.4). For example, monarthritis of a prosthetic joint is probably due to Staphylococcus species, whereas a migratory arthritis in a sexually active woman is probably due to disseminated gonococcal infection. Rarely, the cause may be fungal, protozoal, or mycobacterial, particularly in immunosuppressed patients. Viral joint infections are not considered part of the “septic” category.

Table 107.4 Most Common Organisms and Suggested Antibiotics for Various Patient Groups with Arthritis

AGE/GROUP MOST COMMON ORGANISMS SUGGESTED EMPIRIC ANTIBIOTICS
Overall Staphylococcus aureus most common; also streptococci, gram-negative organisms, anaerobes, Neisseria gonorrhoeae At risk for STD—ceftriaxone; not at risk for STD—oxacillin/nafcillin + ceftriaxone
Infants (<6 mo) Escherichia coli, group B streptococci Oxacillin/nafcillin + cefotaxime/ceftriaxone
Children 6-24 mo Staphylococci, Kingella kingae (no longer Haemophilus influenzae) Oxacillin/nafcillin + cefotaxime/ceftriaxone
Pediatric (>24 mo) N. gonorrhoeae, pneumococci Oxacillin/nafcillin + cefotaxime/ceftriaxone
Intravenous drug abusers S. aureus, gram-negative organisms Oxacillin/nafcillin + ceftriaxone
Prosthetic joint MSSA/MRSA, MSSE/MRSE, Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas Vancomycin + ciprofloxacin

MSSA/MRSA, Methicillin-sensitive/resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MSSE/MRSE, methicillin-sensitive/resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis; STD, sexually transmitted disease.

Major risk factors for septic arthritis in adults include age older than 80 years, diabetes mellitus, RA, prosthetic joint or recent joint surgery, skin infection or ulceration, alcoholism, intravenous drug use, and prior intraarticular corticosteroid injection.1 Previous joint damage from any cause also appears to increase risk.

Pathophysiology

Bacteria can infect the joint via hematogenous spread, direct inoculation (arthrocentesis, trauma, surgery), or contiguous contact (cellulitis, bursitis, tenosynovitis). Any microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, and protozoa, may invade joints; however, the overwhelming majority of cases (90%) are caused by the pyogenic bacteria Staphylococcus and Streptococcus.33 Once the pathogen penetrates the joint space, it initiates a series of inflammatory reactions that may lead to joint destruction and permanent damage. Microorganisms or their products (or both) activate the release of proinflammatory cytokines, such TNF-α and interleukin-1, and proteolytic enzymes, such as metalloproteinases and other collagen-degrading enzymes. These proteins induce synovial membrane proliferation, granulation tissue, neovascularization, and infiltration by polymorphonuclear cells and may result, if untreated, in cartilage and bone destruction. The articular damage may progress even after eradication of microorganisms because persistence of bacterial antigens and metalloproteinases within the joint will continue to promote an inflammatory response.

Treatment

Pain management should be initiated early. After appropriate material for culture is obtained, parenteral antibiotics should be selected to treat the most likely pathogens (see Table 107.4). Another reasonable approach is to treat according to Gram stain results (for gram-positive cocci, start vancomycin; for gram-negative organisms, start ceftriaxone or cefotaxime). If the Gram stain is negative, vancomycin is reasonable for an immunocompetent host and vancomycin plus ceftriaxone (or cefotaxime) for an immunosuppressed individual, injection drug user, or traumatic bacterial arthritis.

Gout and Pseudogout

Pathophysiology

Gout and pseudogout are characterized by crystal deposition in joints with recurring attacks of acute inflammatory arthritis, as well as chronic arthropathy.

Although acute gout never develops in most hyperuricemic individuals, all patients with gouty arthritis have hyperuricemia at some point. Microscopic tophaceous deposits of urate crystals develop in synovial membranes, but deposits alone are asymptomatic. Abrupt increases and decreases in serum urate levels may promote the release of free urate crystals from deposits, which have considerable proinflammatory potential because of their ability to activate synovial epithelial cells and promote the ingress of leukocytes into the joint, which triggers multiple inflammatory cascades. Precipitants include initiation of diuretics and other drugs that inhibit the excretion of uric acid (including aspirin), alcohol use, initiation of urate-lowering drugs, starvation, and tumor lysis. Repetitive joint microtrauma may produce locally increased urate concentrations, which perhaps explains the predilection for the first MTP joint.

An acute gouty attack is spontaneously self-limited (usually lasting 7 to 10 days) and probably mediated by an altered balance between proinflammatory and antiinflammatory mediators in the joint. Low-grade synovitis may persist in affected joints. Inflammation, especially with untreated disease, can lead to chronic synovial proliferation, cartilage loss, and bone erosion. Tophi commonly develop in osteoarthritic interphalangeal joints, thus suggesting a role of connective tissue matrix structure and turnover in urate crystal deposition.

Calcium-containing crystals in the pericellular matrix of cartilage are often deposited in the form of CPPD and therefore lead to a disorder termed chondrocalcinosis, pyrophosphate arthropathy, CPPD crystal deposition disease, or when associated with acute arthritis, pseudogout.36 Precipitation of CPPD crystals in connective tissue is most often asymptomatic. Acute attacks are generally self-limited and often triggered by trauma, surgery, or severe medical illness.

Differential Diagnosis and Medical Decision Making

A known history of gout, typical precipitants, or location in the great toe suggests gout. Chondrocalcinosis (radiographic evidence of calcification in hyaline cartilage, fibrocartilage, or both) is common in pseudogout; though highly suggestive of the diagnosis, it is neither absolutely specific nor universal. Leukocytosis with a left shift and an elevated ESR may be present but are more common in pseudogout than gout. An elevated uric acid level may or may not be found in acute gout and is nondiagnostic by itself. Normal to low levels are reported in 12% to 43% of patients with acute gout attacks.38,39 The pattern of symptoms in chronic pseudogout is often similar to OA and may sometimes mimic RA. A significant minority of patients have coexisting arthritides.

Evaluation for septic arthritis is the diagnostic priority in the ED. Joint aspiration with evaluation of synovial fluid for acute inflammation, crystals, or evidence of infection is necessary, and fluid must be sent for Gram stain and culture. Urate crystals inside neutrophils diagnose gout; phagocytosed CPPD crystals are seen in pseudogout. Some patients have concurrent gout and pseudogout, with both types of crystals being found. Coexistence of crystalline and infectious arthritis in the same joint is well reported. If joint fluid analysis cannot be done, a clinical diagnosis may be made from historical and clinical data,40 but specificity is reduced (Table 107.5).

See Table 107.5, Clinical Diagnostic Rule for Acute Monarticular Gout, online at www.expertconsult.com

Table 107.5 Clinical Diagnostic Rule for Acute Monarticular Gout (Without Synovial Fluid Analysis)

Male sex 2 points
Previous patient-reported arthritis attack 2 points
Onset within 1 day 0.5 point
Joint redness 1 point
First metatarsophalangeal joint involvement 2.5 points
Hypertension or at least 1 cardiovascular disease 1.5 points
Serum uric acid level > 5.88 mg/dL 3.5 points
Interpretation of total:
 High probability of gout ≥8 points
 Intermediate probability 4-8 points
 Low probability <4 points

From Janssens HT, Fransen J, et al. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:1120.

Follow-up, Next Steps in Care, and Patient Education

Drugs that lower uric acid production (e.g., allopurinol, febuxostat) or enhance excretion (e.g., probenecid) may be used as preventive therapy but can be started at follow-up visits.43 Adjunctive measures include a diet low in uric acid (decreased meat and seafood) plus lifestyle modification. Unless an infected joint is suspected, these patients are discharged home with primary care follow-up.

A discussion of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, juvenile idiopathic (rheumatoid) arthritis, and psoriatic arthritis can be found online at www.expertconsult.com

References

1 Margaretten ME, Kohlwes J, Moore D, et al. Does this adult patient have septic arthritis? JAMA. 2007;297:1478–1488.

2 Salzman BE, Nevin JE, Newman JH. A primary care approach to the use and interpretation of common rheumatologic tests. Clin Fam Pract. 2005;7:335–358.

3 Beachley MC, Franklin JW, Ostlund W, et al. Radiology of arthritis. Prim Care. 1993;20:771–794.

4 Chen LX, Schumacher HR. Current trends in crystal identification. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2006;18:171–173.

5 Shmerling RH, Delbanco TL, Tosteson AN, et al. Synovial fluid tests. What should be ordered? JAMA. 1990;264:1009–1014.

6 Li SF, Henderson J, Dickman E, et al. Laboratory tests in adults with monoarticular arthritis: can they rule out a septic joint? Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11:276–280.

7 Sox HC, Liang MH. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate: guidelines for rational use. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104:515–523.

8 Carek PJ, Hunter MH. Joint and soft tissue injections in primary care. Clin Fam Pract. 2005;7:359–378.

9 Lavelle ED, Lavelle L. Intra-articular injections. Med Clin North Am. 2007;91:241–250.

10 Moore RA, Derry S, McQuay HJ. Topical agents in the treatment of rheumatic pain. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2008;34:415–432.

11 McCleane G. Topical analgesics. Med Clin North Am. 2007;91:125–139.

12 Macedo AM, Oakley SP, Panayi GS, et al. Functional and work outcomes improve in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who receive targeted comprehensive occupational therapy. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:1522–1530.

13 Huizinga TWJ, Pincus T. In the clinic. Rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Intern Med. 2010;6:ITC1–1-16.

14 Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:1580–1588.

15 Combe B, Landewe, Lukas C, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of early arthritis: report of a task force of the European Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66:34–45.

16 Pincus T, Sokka T. Laboratory tests to assess patients with rheumatoid arthritis: advantages and limitations. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009;35:731–734.

17 Saag KG, Teng GG, Patkar NM, et al. American College of Rheumatology 2008 recommendations for the use of nonbiologic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:762–784.

18 Smolen JS, Landewe R, Breedveld FC, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:964–975.

19 Goekoop-Ruiterman YP, DeVries-Bouwstra JK, Allaart CF, et al. Comparison of treatment strategies in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:406–415.

20 Gaujoux-Viala C, Smolen JS, Landewé R, et al. Current evidence for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a systematic literature review informing the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:1004–1009.

21 Nam JL, Winthrop KL, van Vollenhoven RF, et al. Current evidence for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a systematic literature review informing the EULAR recommendations for the management of RA. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:976–986.

22 Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Dieppe PA, et al. Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 1: the disease and its risk factors. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:635–646.

23 Felson DT. Clinical practice: osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med. 2006;136:896–907.

24 Dieppe P, Brandt KD. What is important in treating osteoarthritis? Whom should we treat and how should we treat them? Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2003;29:687–716.

25 Hunter DJ, Lo GH. The management of ostearthritis: an overview and call to appropriate conservative treatment. Med Clin North Am. 2009;93:114–130.

26 Miller KL, Clegg DO. Glucosamine and chondroitin sulphate. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2011;37:103–118.

27 Clegg DO, Reda DJ, Harris CL, et al. Glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, and the two in combination for painful knee osteoarthritis. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:795–808.

28 Glass GG. Osteoarthritis. Clin Fam Pract. 2005;7:161–179.

29 Gross KD, Hillstrom H. Knee osteoarthritis: primary care using non-invasive devices and biomechanical principles. Med Clin North Am. 2009;93:131–150.

30 Ernst E. Complementary treatments in rheumatic diseases. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2008;34:455–467.

31 Khan MA. Update on spondyloarthropathies. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:896–907.

32 Carter JD, Hudson AP. Reactive arthritis: clinical aspects and medical management. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009;35:21–44.

33 Ho G, Jue SJ, Cook PP. Arthritis caused by bacteria and their components. In: Harris ED, Jr., Budd RC, Genovese MC, et al. Kelley’s textbook of rheumatology. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2005.

34 Coakley G, Mathews C, Field M, et al. for the British Society for Rheumatology Standards; Guidelines and Audit Working Group. BSR & BHPR, BOA, RCGP and BSAC guidelines for management of the hot swollen joint in adults. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006;45:1039–1041.

35 Mathews CJ, Coakley G. Septic arthritis: current diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2008;20:457–462.

36 Rosenthal AK. Pseudogout: presentation, natural history, and associated conditions. In: Wortmann RL, Schmacher HR, Jr., Becker MA, et al. Crystal-induced arthropathies: gout, pseudogout and apatite-associated syndromes. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2006:99.

37 Rott K, Agudelo C. Gout. JAMA. 2003;289:2857–2860.

38 Park YB, Park YS, Lee SC, et al. Clinical analysis of gouty patients with normouricemia at diagnosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:90–92.

39 Schlesinger N, Norquist JM, Watson DJ. Serum urate during acute gout. J Rheumatol. 2009;36:1287–1289.

40 Jansenns HJ, Fransen J, van de Lisdonk EH, et al. A diagnostic rule for acute gouty arthritis in primary care without joint fluid analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1120–1126.

41 Zhang W, Doherty M, Bardin T, et al. for the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies, Including Therapeutics. European League Against Rheumatism evidence based recommendations for gout. Part II: management. Report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies, Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:1312–1324.

42 Terkletaub RA, Furst DE, Bennett K, et al. High versus low dosing of oral colchicine for early acute gout flare: twenty-four-hour outcome of the first multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-comparison study. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:1060–1068.

43 Laine C, Turner BJ, Williams S, et al. In the clinic: gout. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:ITC2–1-16.

44 Gladman D. Psoriatic arthritis. In: Harris E, ed. Kelley’s textbook of rheumatology. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2005:1155.

45 Warren R, Wilking A, Perez M, et al. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JRA. In: Koopman W, Boulware D, Heudebert G. Clinical primer of rheumatology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004:116.

46 Weiss JE, Ilowite NT. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2007;33:441–470.

47 Royal Australian College of General Practitioners JIA Working Group. Clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, 2009. pp. 1–39.

48 Anthony K, Schanberg L. Pediatric pain syndromes and management of pain in children and adolescents with rheumatic disease. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2005;52:611–639.

49 Leung A, Lemay J. The limping child. J Pediatr Health Care. 2004;18:219–223.

50 Joseph B, Varghese G, Mulpuri K, et al. Natural evolution of Perthes disease. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003;23:590–600.

Psoriatic Arthritis

Juvenile Idiopathic (Rheumatoid) Arthritis

Presenting Signs and Symptoms

JRA and JIA may be especially difficult to identify in preverbal age children, in whom changes in motor activities (crawling, walking, running, holding a cup or spoon) are important clues. Joint complaints in children should be taken seriously, with a close look for objective findings. Pain is usually mild and may be quantifiable with pediatric pain scales. Ask about systemic symptoms (fever, weakness, fatigue), other organ symptoms (GI, eyes, skin), growth and development, and recent injuries, illnesses, or exposures. Consider trauma (and abuse), attendant bruising, and progressive swelling during the visit. Carefully check all joints, not just the most symptomatic. Examine the child for evidence of infection or other involvement, such as rashes, uveitis, carditis, or organomegaly. Major subtypes of JIA include systemic arthritis, oligoarthritis, polyarthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis, and PsA.

Systemic arthritis (10% to 15% of cases of JIA) is the most dramatic finding, with systemic symptoms and onset usually occurring before the age of 4. Diagnostic criteria include high spiking fevers (>39° C) with daily return to normal (or below) for at least 2 weeks, arthritis that may follow the fever, and systemic involvement as shown by one or more of the following:

Systemic symptoms usually resolve within 1 year, but half will evolve into chronic polyarthritis and 25% will be result in erosive joint disease. The 15-year survival rate has been reported to be only 86%.

Oligoarthritis (35%) involves fewer than five joints in the first 6 months of disease, often large joints such as the knee or ankle but not the hip. Affected children are mostly girls (3 : 1) aged 1 to 4. Uveitis develops in about 15%. Although only about 25% of cases remit within 5 years, bone or cartilage destruction does not develop in most children.

Polyarthritis (30% to 40%) involves five or more joints, large and small, and resembles adult RA. Systemic symptoms are mild and fever is low grade. Rheumatoid nodules may be found. Micrognathia and cervical spine involvement occur, and there is a risk for atlantoaxial subluxation. At least two thirds are RF positive, which portends a greater risk for the development of severe erosive disease.

Additional subtypes include enthesitis-related arthritis (4 : 1 male preponderance, usually age >8, often HLA-B27 positive, spinal involvement) and PsA (pauciarticular, skin psoriasis or family history, nail changes, dactylitis), which often precedes any skin lesions by years. Other children demonstrate overlap patterns.45

Differential Diagnosis and Medical Decision Making

Unfortunately, the diagnosis of JIA can be difficult and requires a course of the disease over time, and the differential is long, so a single ED visit is highly unlikely to result in a specific diagnosis. Diagnosis of JIA requires true arthritis (swelling or at least two of the following: heat, limited ROM, tenderness, pain on motion), at least a 6-week duration, age younger than 16, and absence of another known cause. The fever pattern and rash of systemic JRA are distinctive but not conclusive.

Of course, the major concern is identifying active bacterial infection. Infectious arthritides such as Lyme disease (exposure, recent classic rash, neurologic involvement), parvovirus, Kawasaki disease (mucosal involvement), or tuberculosis should be considered. Rheumatic fever is often accompanied by exquisite joint tenderness, high spiking fevers, and migratory polyarthralgia, along with chorea or carditis.

Other rheumatologic possibilities include systemic lupus erythematosus, juvenile dermatomyositis, autoimmune hepatitis, sarcoidosis, and drug reactions. Joint pain occurs with hemoglobinopathies, hemophilias, and leukemias. Localized pain may be traumatic. Diffuse musculoskeletal pain and systemic symptoms (not fever) occur with childhood fibromyalgia.46

No diagnostic studies prove the presence of JIA. CBC, urinalysis, and ESR or CRP are appropriate in the ED. In systemic JIA, severe nonhemolytic anemia, WBC count lower than 20,000/mm3, thrombocytosis, and an ESR higher than 100 mm/hr are common. In other forms, abnormalities are modest. Normal or low platelet counts suggest another diagnosis or a serious complication—rarely, macrophage activation syndrome with disseminated intravascular coagulation, severe anemia, leukopenia, and liver dysfunction develop in children with systemic JIA. Typical synovial fluid WBC counts are approximately 10,000 with JRA, but a range from 600 to 100,000 is reported. Gram stain and culture are obviously critical in evaluating infection. A febrile child requires more extensive evaluation to search for the source of the fever, particularly with a fever of unknown origin.

Radiographic studies help eliminate trauma, tumors, avascular necrosis, and infection. Abnormalities with JRA may include osteoporosis, periostitis, loss of joint space, erosions, and nonspecific soft tissue swelling. Late-stage disease shows joint destruction and fusion.

Treatment and Follow-Up

Initial treatment decisions in the ED usually focus on concern for differential diagnoses (trauma, infection) and the need for analgesia. If a fracture is suspected, a splint, ice, and elevation are used until trauma is ruled out. Decisions regarding antibiotic administration must be based on a thorough clinical evaluation plus the results of synovial fluid analysis.

NSAIDs are first-line medications for pain in all forms of JIA. Try ibuprofen (30 to 40 mg/kg/day divided into three doses) or naproxen (10 to 20 mg/kg/day divided into two doses). Recognize that adverse effects are somewhat different from those in adults. When the need for long-term use becomes apparent, long-acting preparations (nabumetone, etoladac once a day) are available. Acetaminophen or tramadol are also effective for pain, and temporary joint immobilization or support and ice packs help. Oral opioids may be needed for severe acute situations (oxycodone, 0.05 to 2.0 mg/kg/day divided into 4-hour dosing) or severe chronic disease (methadone often used).

About half of JIA patients experience adequate improvement with NSAIDs and the multidisciplinary measures that are essential for pediatric patients with prolonged painful illnesses. Education, physical therapy, and occupational therapy are critical, especially daily ROM exercises. General health maintenance, child and family counseling, cognitive behavioral therapy to manage pain, physical conditioning, and sleep hygiene are all part of a team approach to long-term management. Children who fail to improve will require DMARDs, but these drugs are not appropriate for ED initiation. Methotrexate has been the most frequently used agent, but etanercept and infliximab are highly promising new options. Adjunctive medications include sulfasalazine and low-dose prednisone.

Disposition decisions may be more difficult than in adults, especially with febrile children. Patients should be admitted for severe pain that persists despite ED treatment, as well as for diagnostic confusion, toxic appearance, suspicion of joint or systemic infection, or fever (unless it has an obvious, easily treated source). Children who are active and comfortable in the ED are generally able to go home with close follow-up arranged.

Legg-Calvé-Perthes Disease

Differential Diagnosis

Several other entities may cause hip problems and limping,48,49 and distinction may not be possible in a single ED visit. Constitutional symptoms, fever, and associated disorders are not part of LCP disease. Radiographs are often tremendously helpful in making the diagnosis, as is nuclear scintigraphy. Septic arthritis or osteomyelitis must always be considered, especially with systemic symptoms or another site of infection. Severe pain, acute onset, ESR higher than 20 mm/hr, or temperature above 37.5° C suggests a septic hip. Transient synovitis of the hip is the most common cause of hip pain, with age at peak onset similar to that for LCP disease, but it usually resolves within a month; about half are initially seen in an acute stage, unlike LCP disease. Persistent synovitis may follow a course consistent with LCP disease. Other inflammatory diseases (JRA, rheumatic fever) usually have other joint involvement or systemic findings (or both). Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) tends to occur at older ages (12 to 16 in boys, 10 to 14 in girls). Those with stable SCFE have an intermittent limp and pain with a chronic onset, whereas unstable SCFE is often manifested acutely after a twisting injury. The diagnosis of SCFE is usually made with plain films, although CT or MRI is sometimes needed.

Share this: