Fatty Liver Disease

Published on 20/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Pathology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 7192 times

Chapter 49

Fatty Liver Disease

Elizabeth M. Brunt

Dina G. Tiniakos

Introduction

Definitions

Nomenclature

Alcohol-Induced Liver Disease

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Fatty Liver Disease in Various Patient Groups

Concurrent Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Fatty Liver Disease in Patients with Other Liver Disorders

Fatty Liver Disease in Children

Differentiating Alcohol-Induced from Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Features that Occur More Frequently in Alcoholic Liver Disease

Features that Occur More Frequently in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Grading and Staging of Fatty Liver Disease

Other Forms of Fatty Liver Disease

Drug- and Toxin-Induced Fatty Liver Disease

Fatty Liver Disease after Transplantation

Protein-Energy Malnutrition

Total Parenteral Nutrition

Celiac Disease

Viral Hepatitides

Miscellaneous Causes of Fatty Liver Disease

Introduction

Definitions

Steatosis, defined as the accumulation of triacylglycerides in hepatocytes, is a frequent finding in most liver biopsies.1 As much as 5% of the liver parenchyma may be composed of lipid. By convention, any quantity of lipid that occupies more than 5% of the liver mass is considered pathologic.

Macrovesicular steatosis is an accumulation of lipid droplets of various sizes in hepatocytes in which the cell nuclei are displaced peripherally. It is common to observe small and large droplets in the same cell and to find isolated droplets of lipid.

Microvesicular steatosis has a different appearance and clinical significance. The nuclei of affected hepatocytes are typically centrally located within abundant, foamy-appearing cytoplasm. Special stains, such as Oil Red O, may be necessary to confirm lipid accumulation, whereas in macrovesicular steatosis, the large and small lipid droplets are easily detectable by routine hematoxylin and eosin stain. Diseases associated with microvesicular steatosis are characterized by liver failure and hepatic encephalopathy rather than chronicity and potential fibrosis; the former features are the result of mitochondrial β-oxidation defects. The most common examples of purely microvesicular steatosis are acute fatty liver of pregnancy and Reye syndrome. This process has also been reported in the setting of drug toxicity. Drug-related entities are discussed in Chapter 48.

Alcohol-induced liver disease (ALD) refers to the spectrum of liver disorders directly related to excessive alcohol use. This chapter focuses primarily on the pathologic lesions of the ALD subset characterized by accumulation of fat in the liver parenchyma.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) occurs without significant alcohol use. The clinicopathologic entity is characterized by a variety of hepatic parenchymal injury patterns with more than 5% macrovesicular steatosis.

The term nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is in the same clinical setting as NAFLD, but NASH is associated with specific pathologic lesions in the liver. The lesions include various amounts of macrovesicular steatosis, hepatocellular injury (most commonly seen as ballooning), and inflammation in the hepatic lobules or portal tracts, or both. These lesions and others that may be seen in steatohepatitis are discussed in this chapter.

Nomenclature

The term ALD refers to a spectrum of liver diseases and includes large or mixed large and small droplet macrovesicular steatosis with or without lobular and portal inflammation; steatohepatitis with or without fibrosis; alcoholic hepatitis; alcoholic cirrhosis with or without steatosis, steatohepatitis, or alcoholic hepatitis; and alcoholic foamy degeneration. Hepatocellular carcinoma is a recognized consequence of ALD and cirrhosis.

NAFLD has a more limited pathologic spectrum than ALD. NAFLD may manifest as large droplet or mixed large and small droplet macrovesicular steatosis with or without lobular or portal inflammation; steatohepatitis with or without fibrosis; and cirrhosis with or without steatosis or steatohepatitis. All of the features of NAFLD may be seen in ALD, prompting use of the term nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.2,3 Hepatocellular carcinoma may arise as a consequence of NAFLD-induced cirrhosis and is therefore included in the spectrum of NAFLD lesions. Hepatocellular carcinoma is increasingly recognized in noncirrhotic NAFLD.4 However, the true incidence of this neoplastic complication in cirrhotic or noncirrhotic liver is less certain than with ALD.

Although NASH and NAFLD are commonly used terms, neither truly represents the underlying pathophysiologic disease process,57 and although there are histologic similarities with ALD, there are also dissimilarities between these disorders. The relationship between NAFLD and alcohol use may not be as straightforward as originally thought, because a few studies indicate that some patients may be at risk for liver disease from both causes simultaneously. Modest alcohol use also may protect against the effects of insulin resistance.8,9

For diagnostic pathologists, microscopically based diagnoses related to fatty liver disease are best rendered des­criptively with terms such as steatosis or steatohepatitis, because in most circumstances, only careful clinical evaluation can determine the true underlying cause of the patient’s illness. Many different types of clinical situations may result in similar histologic findings, and in most cases, knowledge of the patient’s clinical information is essential to establish an accurate cause. This is similar to the situation for most cases of chronic hepatitis. The difference with fatty liver disease is that there are no serologic tests available to diagnose or exclude NAFLD with complete certainty.10

Alcohol-Induced Liver Disease

Clinical Features

The clinical features of ALD vary considerably. Table 49.1 highlights the primary clinical manifestations of the four main clinicopathologic subtypes of ALD: fatty liver, alcoholic hepatitis, alcoholic cirrhosis, and alcoholic foamy degeneration.

Table 49.1

 

Symptoms, Signs, and Laboratory Abnormalities of Alcohol-Induced Liver Disease

Symptoms and Signs Fatty Liver Steatohepatitis and Alcoholic Hepatitis Cirrhosis Foamy Degeneration
Asymptomatic +++ + Portal hypertension
Right upper quadrant discomfort +++ Pain, not mild + to ++ +
Hepatomegaly ++ ++ + to ++ +
Elevated AST, normal ALT ++ + + (normal if abstinent) ++
AST/ALT ratio AST > ALT AST/ALT > 1-3 common AST/ALT > 1 AST > ALT
Marked AST elevation <5 times normal As much as 5 times normal ++
Marked alkaline phosphatase elevation +/− ++
Bilirubin elevation >10 mg/dL − (unless advanced) ++
Jaundice Cardinal sign As above ++
Elevated white blood cell count >10,000/mm3 − (may be decreased)
Fever +++ + (with infection)
Ascites +++ + (advanced)

image

ALT, Alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; −, does not occur; +, occurs uncommonly; ++, common; +++, very common.

 

Patients with ALD and fatty liver may be asymptomatic or may have right upper quadrant discomfort at presentation (see Table 49.1). Patients with alcoholic hepatitis usually have abdominal pain and pancreatitis, whereas patients with cirrhosis and alcoholic foamy degeneration often experience only vague abdominal discomfort. In all forms of ALD, the liver is typically enlarged. Fever, an elevated white blood cell count, and jaundice occur in various degrees with the different forms of ALD and may be related to ALD (e.g., alcoholic hepatitis) or to a secondary infection (e.g., peritonitis caused by alcoholic cirrhosis).

At clinical presentation, patients may have elevated serum levels of aminotransferases (i.e., aspartate aminotransferase [AST] and alanine aminotransferase [ALT]), and a ratio of AST to ALT greater than 1 is useful in the evaluation of patients with ALD. AST levels are typically greater than ALT levels in all forms of ALD. Radiographic evaluation plays a role in screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis and in the clinical care of critically ill patients with pancreatitis and suspected intestinal ileus.

Epidemiology and Prevalence

Worldwide, ALD has no social or ethnic barriers, but it is uncommon in very young and very elderly individuals. Both genders may be affected, although women are at higher risk. In the United States, 7.4% of the population meet the criteria for alcohol dependence or abuse. It is the leading cause of end-stage liver disease and liver-related mortality and follows only heart disease and cancer as the major health issue in the United States.11 The reported rates of per capita liters of alcohol consumed per year by individuals older than 15 years of age varies throughout the world: 13.9 in the Russian Federation; 12.9 in Germany, France, and the United Kingdom; 9.3 to 8.5 in North America, Japan, and Australia; 5.0 in China, Philippines, and Vietnam; 1.3 in Iran and Saudi Arabia; and 0.6 in Afghanistan and Pakistan.11 Alcohol use may combine synergistically with other forms of chronic liver disease to generate progressive disease, malignancy, and morbidity.12

Familial Associations

Family, twin, and ethnic studies have confirmed a genetic susceptibility to ALD.11 Factors under investigation include gender, genes involved in the metabolism of alcohol (particularly in East Asians), cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) and other enzymes involved in the pathways of oxidative stress, various cytokines (e.g., tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α], interleukin 10 [IL10]), genes involved in the oxidation of hepatic fat, mechanisms of matrix deposition and degradation in fibrosis, and immune reactions to endotoxin and toxic adducts.13

Risk Factors

Liver disease does not develop in all individuals who abuse alcohol. The risk for ALD, even among heavy drinkers, is less than 10% to 15%. Known risk factors include the amount of alcohol consumed during a 10- to 20-year period (>60 g/day for men; 20 to 30 g/day for women), gender (female > male), central obesity, patterns of consumption (nonmealtime > mealtime; daily > weekend only; various types of beverages rather than one type), associated medications (acetaminophen), amount of coffee intake, and genes that regulate expression of proinflammatory cytokines and immune response mechanisms.1318 A sequence variation in the patatin-like phospholipase 3 (PNPLA3) gene, which encodes adiponutrin, is associated with the development of cirrhosis in white alcoholics.19 The same gene variation was previously found to correlate with steatosis in different populations around the world and with features of progressive disease in NAFLD patients.20

Pathogenesis

Alcohol-induced liver damage is a multifactorial process that involves alterations of the gut, gut microbiota, and hepatocellular metabolic pathways and activation of the innate and adaptive immune systems. Resultant outcomes are activation of proinflammatory and profibrogenic molecular mechanisms in specific liver cells.

The primary mechanism of alcohol-induced liver injury is hepatocellular oxidative stress.21,22 Ethanol is metabolized to acetate in the liver mainly by two enzyme systems: the dehydrogenases (i.e., alcohol and aldehyde), which produce acetate and result in steatosis, and the microsomal ethanol-oxidizing system (MEOS). The direct hepatotoxic effects of alcohol are caused primarily by acetaldehyde. Oxidative stress and free radical production result in mitochondrial damage, depletion of the antioxidants such as reduced glutathione, toxicity by free radicals, and induction of lipid peroxidation. Acetaldehyde-formed toxic adducts bind to proteins and lead to additional hepatocellular injury, serve as neoantigens for initiation of the adaptive immune response, and promote collagen production by hepatic stellate cells. The net effect of acetaldehyde production in hepatocytes is the accumulation of intracellular proteins, lipids, water, and electrolytes with the loss of the hepatocyte structural keratins 8 (K8) and 18 (K18). Histologically, they manifest as cellular enlargement, ballooning, empty-appearing cells, steatosis, and loss of immunoreactivity for K8 and K18.23,24

The key enzyme of the MEOS is the ethanol-inducible CYP2E1, which is located primarily in the endoplasmic reticulum of acinar zone 3 hepatocytes. Activation of this enzyme system results in the production of reactive oxygen species, such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and superoxide anions (O2), which cause further lipid peroxidation of cell membranes. This enzyme system also metabolizes acetaminophen and produces the toxic metabolite N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine (NAPQI). Even small amounts of acetaminophen may augment depletion of the antioxidant capabilities of the liver in chronic alcoholism.

Other sources of ethanol-induced oxidative stress include endotoxin-activated Kupffer cells, functionally impaired mitochondria, and ferric iron accumulation. Oxidative stress promotes hepatocellular injury, apoptosis, and necrosis; proinflammatory cytokine production (e.g., TNF-α, IL1, IL6); and parenchymal inflammation with polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) and mononuclear cells and perisinusoidal fibrosis.25,26

Excessive alcohol intake leads to increased gut permeability and increased portal venous exposure to gut-derived endotoxins. This process results in Kupffer cell activation through the CD14/toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) complex and activation of the innate immune response.22,26

Increased lactate production, another downstream effect of ethanol metabolism, manifests as hyperuricemia and impaired carbohydrate metabolism. Hypoglycemia may occur. Chronic alcohol use impairs protein production and secretion. Multiple aberrations of lipid metabolism result in increased triglyceride production and subsequent accumulation (i.e., steatosis).

The mechanisms of fibrosis are under active scientific investigation. Ultimately, there is an imbalance between collagen deposition and degradation by activated hepatic stellate cells and portal myofibroblasts. Unique to ALD is the additional involvement of hepatocytes and sinusoidal endothelial cells in fibrogenesis through the production of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and fibronectin isoforms.27 Hypoxia induced by ethanol metabolism in zone 3 hepatocytes upregulates vascular endothelial growth factor.26,27

Pathology

Grossly, steatosis enlarges the liver and imparts a greasy appearance. Livers with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis may be enlarged and firm and contain micronodules (≤3 mm in diameter) scattered throughout the parenchyma. In some cases, fibrotic livers may be small and firm. With time, the nodules may coalesce to form larger ones, at which point determination of the underlying cause may not be possible. Hepatocellular carcinomas typically stand out on background cirrhosis as raised, green-tinged or darker nodules that usually are larger than 8 mm in diameter.

The histologic pattern of tissue injury in patients with alcohol-induced fatty liver disease initially involves acinar zone 3 (roughly equivalent to perivenular) hepatocytes. In patients with cirrhosis, steatosis or steatohepatitis may or may not persist.

Steatosis

Steatosis, the earliest pathologic finding in ALD, is not consistently found in all forms of ALD.21,28 Alcoholic steatosis is typically macrovesicular and is characterized by large intracellular droplets of lipid in hepatocytes (single or multiple) that peripherally displace the cell nucleus. A minor component of lobular chronic inflammation or mild portal inflammation may be identified, but fibrosis is usually absent.

Steatohepatitis

Steatohepatitis is defined by the presence of both steatosis and hepatocyte injury. Injured hepatocytes may appear ballooned, apoptotic, or lytic. Confluent and bridging necrosis are rarely found in ALD.

Hepatocellular ballooning is considered an essential feature of steatohepatitis by most hepatopathologists.7 Ballooned hepatocytes are enlarged cells with rarefied, reticulated cytoplasm (Fig. 49.1) that may or may not contain fat droplets and intracytoplasmic material referred to as Mallory-Denk bodies (MDBs) or Mallory hyaline. Ballooned hepatocytes are located predominantly in zone 3 and are commonly associated with some degree of perisinusoidal fibrosis (Fig. 49.2).29

image
FIGURE 49.1 In the photomicrograph, ballooned hepatocytes are easily distinguished from the surrounding normal hepatocytes.
image
FIGURE 49.2 The ballooned hepatocyte in the center of the field is located among steatotic hepatocytes and is adjacent to fibrous tissue. There is a poorly formed Mallory-Denk body in the ballooned hepatocyte.

Apoptotic hepatocytes, also called acidophil bodies, are common in patients with alcoholic steatohepatitis. These round, eosinophilic fragments of cytoplasm located in the hepatic sinusoids may or may not retain nuclear pyknotic material. Lobular inflammation in patients with steatohepatitis is usually mild and consists of mixed acute and chronic or mainly chronic inflammation. Scattered lobular microgranulomas and lipogranulomas are often observed. Lobular lipogranulomas may consist of multiple or single fat droplets surrounded by mononuclear cells and eosinophils (Fig. 49.3). Large portal lipogranulomas are frequently observed in ALD.30 PMNs may be observed in small clusters adjacent to ballooned hepatocytes or shrunken, eosinophilic (apoptotic) hepatocytes that contain MDBs. When PMNs are found next to hepatocytes that contain MDBs, the lesion is often referred to as satellitosis (Fig. 49.4).

image
FIGURE 49.3 Mixed large and small droplet steatosis. Each of the two lipogranulomas (center) consists of a single droplet of fat surrounded by pigmented Kupffer cells.
image
FIGURE 49.4 Two areas of satellitosis are evident in this field. Polymorphonuclear leukocytes surround hepatocytes harboring hyaline material. Other nearby hepatocytes contain fat.

Although common, MDBs and satellitosis are not required for the diagnosis. MDBs are not specific to ALD; the structures are seen in NAFLD, chronic cholestatic liver disease, copper toxicity, and amiodarone toxicity. In steatohepatitis of any origin, MDBs are usually found in zone 3 hepatocytes (Fig. 49.5) and are more common in areas of perisinusoidal fibrosis, whereas in chronic cholestasis, copper toxicity, and amiodarone toxicity, MDBs are more common in periportal hepatocytes.1,6 MDBs may also occur in focal nodular hyperplasia, hepatocellular adenoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma.31 MDBs can often be visualized by trichrome stains (Fig. 49.6) and confirmed by the use of immunohistochemistry for K8, K18, ubiquitin, or dynactin 4 (DCTN4, formerly designated p62).32

image
FIGURE 49.5 Numerous Mallory-Denk bodies are seen in a biopsy specimen from a patient with alcoholic steatohepatitis are shown.
image
FIGURE 49.6 A large, ropy Mallory-Denk body is seen near the lower right portion of the terminal hepatic vein (trichrome stain).

Some cases of ALD may show predominantly portal lymphocytic inflammation in the absence of serologic evidence of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. This feature may correlate with the degree of fibrosis33 and may reflect an associated autoimmune component to the underlying liver disease.34 Acute inflammation accompanied by a ductular reaction in portal tracts (i.e., pericholangitis) may represent concurrent pancreatitis, whereas increased numbers of portal macrophages may indicate recurrent partial biliary obstruction.30

Alcoholic Hepatitis

Patients with alcoholic hepatitis might not have steatosis. Histologic features of alcoholic hepatitis include hepatocyte ballooning, apoptotic bodies, MDBs with satellitosis, canalicular cholestasis, dense perisinusoidal fibrosis, and a perivenular lesion often referred to as sclerosing hyaline necrosis (i.e., MDBs, satellitosis, and obliterative fibrosis of the outflow vein). Portal hypertension may occur with sclerosing hyaline necrosis. Bridging fibrosis and a ductular reaction may be identified. The absence of steatosis does not rule out alcohol-induced hepatitis.

Alcoholic Foamy Degeneration

Alcoholic foamy degeneration is an unusual and often serious type of ALD associated with marked elevations of aminotransferases, γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase, and bilirubin.35 Histologically, it is characterized by diffuse, primarily microvesicular steatosis without inflammation or ballooning or by marked fibrosis with or without canalicular cholestasis (Fig. 49.7). MDBs are uncommon. Perivenular and perisinusoidal fibrosis may be evident. Clinically, the disorder mimics extrahepatic biliary obstruction, but the liver biopsy findings can be used to distinguish the two entities. Alcoholic foamy degeneration is reversible with abstinence from alcohol.

image
FIGURE 49.7 This biopsy was obtained from a patient with known alcoholism, hepatomegaly, and elevated aspartate aminotransferase and bilirubin values. It contains no inflammation, ballooning, or Mallory-Denk bodies, and there is only a minor degree of fibrosis. Diffuse steatosis is evident, and a significant portion is microvesicular.
Fibrosis and Cirrhosis

The characteristic pattern of early fibrosis in patients with noncirrhotic alcoholic steatohepatitis or alcoholic hepatitis is pericellular or perisinusoidal. This pattern results from deposition of collagen in the space of Disse and is commonly referred to as chicken wire fibrosis (Fig. 49.8).

image
FIGURE 49.8 The dense zone 3 perisinusoidal fibrosis illustrates the characteristic “chicken wire” network of fibrosis.

Fibrosis usually begins in zone 3 of the hepatic acini (Fig. 49.9). This type of fibrosis may be identified with or without steatohepatitis. However, when pericellular or perisinusoidal fibrosis occurs without steatohepatitis, it probably indicates that the patient had at least one prior episode of steatohepatitis. In ALD, perisinusoidal fibrosis may involve large portions of the lobules and become quite dense (Fig. 49.10). In these cases, the patient may also have clinical evidence of portal hypertension despite the absence of cirrhosis.

image
FIGURE 49.9 On low power, the zone 3 accentuation of steatohepatitis is best appreciated with a trichrome stain. Ballooning, steatosis, and perisinusoidal fibrosis can be seen.
image
FIGURE 49.10 This biopsy from a patient with chronic alcoholism and portal hypertension shows dense perisinusoidal fibrosis and loss of hepatic architecture. This appearance is common in samples from patients with advanced alcohol-induced liver disease.

Perivenular fibrosis, a thickened sheath of collagen around the outflow veins in the absence of perisinusoidal fibrosis, has been identified in patients with steatosis that subsequently progressed to cirrhosis. This lesion is therefore considered a prognostic indicator of progression if alcohol exposure is continued.21

With disease progression, periportal fibrosis may develop (Fig. 49.11), followed in some cases by bridging fibrosis in a central-central, central-portal, or portal-portal pattern. In ALD, regions of parenchymal extinction (i.e., septa) may be quite broad (Fig. 49.12). After cirrhosis is established, areas of perisinusoidal fibrosis may not be evident. Periportal fibrosis and bridging fibrosis are often accompanied by a ductular (proliferative) reaction. In ALD, isolated portal fibrosis in the absence of portal inflammation is uncommon and may be a manifestation of recurrent pancreatitis or biliary obstruction.30 Itoh observed a pattern of portal fibrosis characteristic of ALD known as holly leaf.36 This pattern of fibrosis, which is commonly associated with hemochromatosis, is characterized by portal expansion and nonbridging, small, fibrous extensions or spikes into the surrounding parenchyma that resemble the outline of the holly leaf.

image
FIGURE 49.11 With progression of fibrosis in alcohol-induced liver disease, periportal fibrosis may be prominent.
image
FIGURE 49.12 The small nodule is surrounded by broad regions of scar tissue (i.e., parenchymal extinction) in a patient with alcoholic cirrhosis.

In patients with ALD with bridging fibrosis,37 periseptal ductular reaction may be prominent. The ductular reaction, characterized by proliferation of K7- and/or K19-positive ovoid cells forming ductular structures in an inflammatory, stromal matrix,38 less likely represents a cholestatic process in end-stage liver disease,26,30 but it is most likely the result of impaired regenerative activity of hepatocytes resulting from the anti-regenerative effects of alcohol.39

ALD-associated cirrhosis may be macronodular, micro­nodular, or mixed. Micronodular nodules are typically less than 3 mm in diameter. Larger nodules may develop when multiple nodules coalesce to form mixed micronodular and macronodular cirrhosis. Macronodular cirrhosis may be difficult to diagnose in a liver biopsy specimen because of the large size of the nodules; clues to abnormal architecture can be sought by use of a reticulin stain. Clusters of oncocytic hepatocytes suggest macronodular cirrhosis (see Chapter 50). Phlebosclerosis and occlusive disease of the terminal hepatic venules and sublobular veins may occur in patients with ALD-induced cirrhosis.40

In ALD-associated cirrhosis, periseptal hepatocellular copper granules and, uncommonly, α1-antitrypsin globules may be found. The role of heterozygosity for genes related to α1-antitrypsin in promoting damage in patients with ALD is a subject of ongoing debate.41 Increased iron levels in ALD is discussed later. Pseudotumoral nodules, which correspond to areas of active alcoholic hepatitis in cirrhotic livers, may be recognized on imaging studies and confused for hepatocellular carcinoma. These lesions may result from hypervascularity.42

Other Pathologic Features of Alcohol-Induced Liver Disease
Megamitochondria.

Megamitochondria (i.e., giant mitochondria) are identified by light microscopy as intracytoplasmic, round or cigar-shaped, eosinophilic structures in hepatocytes, and they are most readily seen in hepatocytes that contain microvesicular steatosis (Fig. 49.13). Megamitochondria may also occur in normal pregnancy, acute fatty liver of pregnancy, and Wilson disease.

image
FIGURE 49.13 A nonzonal group of hepatocytes with tiny fat vacuoles is evident in the cytoplasm. Many of the hepatocytes also contain eosinophilic, round megamitochondria.
Iron Deposition.

Mildly increased iron deposition is common in most forms of ALD. However, in a minority of cases, it may be moderate or severe.23 Possible reasons for hemosiderosis in ALD include increased dysregulation of hepcidin production,43 intestinal iron absorption, iron in some types of alcoholic beverages, hemolysis related to spur cell anemia, and upregulation of the transferrin receptor.18 With a modified Perls stain, iron deposition is usually nonzonal.30,37 In ALD-related cirrhosis,37 iron deposition may vary in quantity between individual regenerative nodules (Fig. 49.14).

image
FIGURE 49.14 In a patient with alcoholic cirrhosis, the nodule in the center of the field shows prominent iron staining (modified Perls iron stain).
Acute and Chronic Cholestasis.

Any of the following pathologic processes related to ALD may result in intrahepatic cholestasis, which is characterized by intracanalicular bile plugs: severe fatty liver, alcoholic pancreatitis due to gallstones or alcohol, alcoholic foamy degeneration, alcoholic hepatitis, and decompensated alcoholic cirrhosis. Canalicular bile thrombi are observed in 15% to 32% of livers with ALD (Fig. 49.15). Severe fatty liver with portal tract features of cholangitis and cholestasis is a specific clinicopathologic cholestatic syndrome in patients with ALD. Bile stasis in ALD also may be a manifestation of superimposed viral hepatitis or drug-induced jaundice.21 In patients with established ALD-associated cirrhosis, a copper stain may show mild positivity, which represents chronic retention of bile caused by the cirrhotic remodeling.

image
FIGURE 49.15 A cholestatic rosette with a central bile plug and several surrounding hepatocytes containing intracellular bile are identified in a biopsy specimen from a patient with fatty liver disease resulting from alcohol-induced liver disease.

In advanced cases of ALD, the cytoplasm of some hepatocytes may have a ground-glass appearance because of smooth endoplasmic reticulum proliferation, or it may be deeply eosinophilic, referred to as oxyphil or oncocytic change because of increased numbers of mitochondria. Both changes are considered adaptive. Historically, their presence was considered indicative of ongoing alcohol consumption, but one research group reported that they might also be observed after periods of prolonged abstinence.30

Vascular Lesions.

Sclerosing hyaline necrosis, which is a marker of severe alcoholic hepatitis, and obliterative vein lesions may be responsible for the development of noncirrhotic portal hypertension in patients with ALD. Sclerosing hyaline necrosis consists of a combination of acinar zone 3 lesions, including dense perivenular and perisinusoidal fibrosis (i.e., sclerosis), occlusion of terminal hepatic venules, MDBs, and liver cell necrosis and loss, which results in the formation of large perivenular scars. Lesions of the terminal hepatic venules and sublobular veins include perivenular fibrosis, phlebosclerosis, and, less frequently, lymphocytic phlebitis (Fig. 49.16).40

image
FIGURE 49.16 There is no evidence of steatosis or steatohepatitis in the biopsy specimen from a patient with alcohol-induced liver disease. The outflow vein is almost obliterated. A small artery branch lies close to the vein, and a ductular reaction is evident at the edge of the developing septum.
Treatment Effects.

Alcoholic steatosis may resolve completely within 4 weeks of alcohol abstinence.30 However, lesions associated with alcoholic hepatitis or steatohepatitis may persist for as long as 6 months after alcohol withdrawal, albeit with decreased severity.44 With abstinence, there is usually an increase in the degree of portal lymphocytic infiltration.44

Prognostic Lesions.

Perivenular fibrosis in steatosis in the absence of cirrhosis portends progression unless abstinence occurs. Acute cholestasis correlates with poor survival of hospitalized patients with ALD.21 These patients have a reduced 5-year survival rate (22%) compared with patients with ALD who have no or mild cholestasis (54%).23 The number of apoptotic bodies correlates positively with severe histologic and clinical disease activity.45,46 Alcoholic hepatitis, sclerosing hyaline necrosis, and severe steatosis represent poor-prognostic lesions in patients with ALD, particularly in those with cirrhosis.21,47 In noncirrhotic patients, mixed steatosis and the finding of megamitochondria in the initial liver biopsy of alcoholic patients without steatohepatitis correlate with an increased risk of subsequent fibrosis or cirrhosis on follow-up.48 In acute-on-chronic liver failure caused by ALD, marked ductular bilirubinostasis and many MDBs are significant predictors of in-hospital mortality.49

Lesions in the Allograft Liver.

Any of the previously described lesions may manifest as recurrent or de novo ALD in a liver allograft. Care is taken to evaluate other features of allografts, particularly acute and chronic rejection and recurrence of hepatitis C (see Chapter 46).

Natural History and Treatment

The financial and social burdens associated with ALD are significant.11,50 Alcoholic hepatitis is associated with a significant risk of hospitalization and loss of time from work, morbidity and short-term mortality, and progression to cirrhosis within 5 years for as many as 70% of individuals. Few affected individuals are able to reverse the disease process with complete abstinence.11 A 12-year historical study from a national registry of Danish subjects comparing biopsy-proven ALD with the general population showed that the cirrhosis risk was higher for affected women than men and twice as high for patients with steatohepatitis than those with pure steatosis.51

Chronic alcohol abuse is responsible for as many as 45% of cases of hepatocellular carcinoma in Western countries,52 a rate that is higher than that for chronic hepatitis C.18 Coexistent HCV infection has an additive effect on the risk of carcinoma,11 and other comorbid factors, such as chronic hepatitis B, hemochromatosis, obesity, and cigarette smoking, contribute to an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and mortality in patients with ALD.53,54 Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma also has been linked to ALD.55

The mainstay of treatment for ALD is abstinence from alcohol. One of the pharmacologic methods of treatment of alcoholism, cyanamide, may produce isolated, nonzonal eosinophilic globules in hepatocytes. Treatment of hospitalized patients with alcoholic hepatitis includes steroids and the antioxidants pentoxifylline and S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAMe). For abstinent patients with cirrhosis, liver transplantation is an accepted treatment option. More controversial is a practice of liver transplantation for patients with acute alcoholic hepatitis.56,57

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Clinical Features

Individuals with NAFLD may be asymptomatic or may show mild, nonspecific symptoms such as fatigue and right upper quadrant discomfort or pain (Table 49.2). Fever is not a feature of uncomplicated NAFLD; when present, it suggests a different or concomitant disorder.

Table 49.2

 

Symptoms, Signs, and Laboratory Abnormalities of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Symptoms and Signs Fatty Liver Steatohepatitis Cirrhosis
Asymptomatic ++ + Portal hypertension
Right upper quadrant discomfort ++ ++ +
Hepatomegaly ++ ++ +
Elevated AST, normal ALT
AST/ALT ratio AST/ALT < 1 AST/ALT < 1 AST/ALT ≥ 1
Marked AST elevation
Marked alkaline phosphatase elevation
Bilirubin elevation
Jaundice
Elevated white blood cell count
Fever
Ascites + (advanced)

image

ALT, Alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; −, does not occur; +, occurs uncommonly; ++, common; +++, very common.

 

The most common clinical feature of NAFLD is central (truncal or abdominal) obesity, which is best assessed by measurement of waist circumference. For adult men, central obesity is a waist circumference greater than 102 cm, and for adult women, it is greater than 88 cm. Obesity is defined by body mass index (BMI), which is the weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared (kg/m2). Compared with waist circumference, it is less specific and does not assess the anatomic location of the metabolically unique subcutaneous and visceral fat depots or shape of the body habitus. For non-Asian adults, the current definitions used are overweight (BMI > 25 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2). Because the Asian body habitus is deceptively thin and able to conceal visceral adiposity, lower BMI values for overweight and obesity have been recommended.58

Clinical evidence of hepatomegaly may be found in patients with an enlarged, fatty liver. Ascites and other features of portal hypertension may be identified in patients with NAFLD-associated cirrhosis. Obstructive sleep apnea and acanthosis nigricans are recognized associations of NAFLD.

Laboratory values commonly assessed for patients with NAFLD include ALT, AST, and GGT. Patients also undergo tests for hyperglycemia (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] is used to evaluate long-term glycemic control), tests for insulin resistance (based on calculations of fasting glucose and insulin levels by using quantitative insulin sensitivity check index [QUICKI] and homeostasis model assessment [HOMA-IR]), and tests of lipid parameters.21

The overall sensitivity of liver enzymes for detection of fatty liver disease is poor.21,59,60 For instance, patients with normal ALT levels may have steatosis or advanced steatohepatitis61 or silent cirrhosis.62,63 If elevated, the ALT value is greater than the AST value, and an ALT/AST ratio greater than 1 is often found in cases of precirrhotic NAFLD; the reverse situation occurs in ALD. Autoantibodies, particularly antinuclear antibody and rarely antimitochondrial antibody, have been reported in as many as 34% of individuals with NAFLD.64 In some, only further detailed clinical testing or liver biopsy can distinguish autoimmune hepatitis from concurrent autoimmune hepatitis with NAFLD or NAFLD alone.64 A possible association of autoantibodies with more severe disease has been suggested but not confirmed.65,66 In combination with the proven lack of reproducible gross evaluation of the liver by surgeons, authorities recommend a liver biopsy for all high-risk and bariatric patients,6769 especially when other causes of steatosis have been excluded.59

Abnormal iron study results are a common feature in patients with NAFLD. For instance, elevated serum levels of ferritin (but not transferrin saturation) may be found in patients with NAFLD and may cause clinical concern about an iron overload disorder.70 The serum ferritin level in NAFLD patients has been reported as an independent predictor of the histologic severity of underlying liver disease.71 An elevated serum ferritin level may indicate hepatocyte necrosis and systemic inflammation, and it is a recognized feature of the metabolic syndrome (discussed later). However, iron overload itself is not a feature of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The associations of iron dysregulation, HFE (hemochromatosis) mutations, and fibrosis with the metabolic syndrome remain subjects of debate.70 A meta-analysis did not support an association between HFE genetic variants and NAFLD.72

The proinflammatory iron regulator hepcidin is expressed in the liver and adipose tissue of obese patients, and this finding correlates with low transferrin values in 68% and anemia in 24% of these individuals.73 Demonstration of hepcidin mRNA and protein in adipose tissue is a new finding and is the subject of iron and adipokine studies.73

Laboratory tests are indicative of the complexity of this condition. Markers of systemic inflammation, such as elevated levels of C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, are found in the setting of NASH and fibrosis.74 A depressed level of adiponectin, an endocrine product of visceral adipose tissue, is recognized as a pathologic feature of NAFLD or NASH.74 Some work has implicated additional factors as being proinflammatory (e.g., hemoglobin) in subsets of individuals with NAFLD but without the metabolic syndrome.75 In contrast with ALD, leukocytosis, cholestasis, and jaundice are not typical features of uncomplicated, noncirrhotic NASH.

By ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the characteristic finding in NAFLD is increased hepatic fat. The ultrasound finding is referred to as a bright liver. Newer types of imaging studies use methods to semiquantitate the lipid content of the liver.76 However, when steatosis involves less than 33% of the liver parenchyma, imaging tests may not detect it.77 Imaging is also not an adequate replacement for tissue analysis for determination of the degree of disease activity or the stage of fibrosis in patients with precirrhotic NASH.78

Epidemiology and Prevalence

The epidemiology and prevalence of NAFLD are understood in terms of its relationship with obesity and increased risks of stroke and heart disease, a group of associations referred to as metabolic syndrome. The common underlying feature of this syndrome is systemic insulin resistance. Studies have confirmed associations of NAFLD with hepatic insulin resistance, cardiovascular diseases,79 and the metabolic syndrome in adults80 and children.81 In one definition of metabolic syndrome, a patient must have at least two of the following disorders plus type 2 diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance, or glucose intolerance: obesity (BMI ≥ 30); arterial hypertension (≥140/90 mm Hg); dyslipidemia as low levels of high-density lipoprotein (<0.9 mmol/L) or hypertriglyceridemia (>1.7 mmol/L); and microalbuminuria (>20 µg/min).82 The sole finding of fatty liver may indicate progression of the metabolic syndrome83 and progression of liver disease.84

NAFLD is a worldwide disorder and has been documented in almost all cultures. This global phenomenon is closely related to acquisition of a Western diet and lifestyle, which includes less physical activity. Initially thought to be a disease predominantly of overweight women, the entire spectrum of NAFLD is now recognized as common among men of all ages, but severe NASH and advanced fibrosis remain more common among adult women.21,59 Several studies have confirmed an underrepresentation of this disease process in African Americans of all age groups and an overrepresentation in Hispanics.59

Once referred to as a disease of the affluent, NAFLD has become recognized as everyman’s disease.85 Future projections of the rates of obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and their complications in the developing world for the year 2030 are staggering. They range from 18.6% in sub-Saharan Africa to 79.4% in India. The projected percent positive change for type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence is 32% in Europe, 72% in the United States, 150% in India, 162% in sub-Saharan Africa, and 164% in the Middle East.86

Having considered the worldwide and multicultural nature of NAFLD, some studies have evaluated certain ethnic proclivities for development of this disease. For instance, an image-based study of hepatic steatosis from a large, urban, multiethnic population in the United States76 found the following relative prevalence rates: Hispanic > white > African American. Results from a subsequent clinic-based study that used liver tests and liver biopsy results differed only slightly,87 showing the following ethnic prevalence rates: white > Hispanic> Asian. African Americans represented only 3% of patients in this cohort. Others have observed an apparent underrepresentation of African Americans in cohorts of patients with NAFLD.88 A small biopsy series from an inner-city hospital in the United States that primarily serves African Americans confirmed the relative scarcity of the disease in this patient population. Less than 2% of 320 liver biopsies showed clinicopathologic evidence of NAFLD, even though the BMI of the cohort was between 26.9 and 32.7.89

Unfortunately, most of the early prevalence studies were performed without a full understanding of the link between the metabolic syndrome and fatty liver disease. In later studies, surrogate markers such as elevated ALT levels and a bright liver on ultrasound were used to examine study populations. However, similar to pathologic studies, the results vary widely, which is partly related to the criteria used to define the positivity of test values. For instance, in studies that relied on elevated serum aminotransferase levels, recognized shortcomings included underrecognition of positive cases with normal test values, determination of criteria for normal values in an increasingly obese population,84 determination of reliable ALT values from frozen sera, and ascertainment of the levels of alcohol intake.90 Methods of assessment of body habitus (i.e., BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, midthigh measurements, and more sophisticated and expensive calculations) also vary.78 Commonly cited studies are listed in Table 49.3.

Table 49.3

 

Prevalence of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease among U.S. Adults Based on NHANES III Data*

Study Criteria Prevalence of NAFLD
Clark et al, 2002274 Any elevation of AST, ALT, GGT 23% of all U.S. adults
31% male
16% female
39% of obese men, 40% of obese women
Clark et al, 2003275 ± patients with diabetes AST > 37 U/L, ALT > 40 U/L (men)
AST, ALT > 31 U/L (women)
7.9% of all U.S. adults; 69% unexplained (5.5% of adults)
Ruhl and Everhart, 2003276 Elevated ALT only; excluded patients with diabetes ALT > 43 U/L (men and women)
2.8% elevated ALT, 65% explained by elevated body mass index

image

* Limitations of NHANES data: autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, Wilson’s disease, and α1-antitrypsin deficiency not excluded rigorously and absence of liver pathology for confirmation or exclusion.

ALT, Alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; GGT, γ-glutamyltransferase; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NHANES III, Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

 

Validation of the findings of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) has emerged from subsequent studies. One calculated hepatic lipid levels by proton magnetic spectroscopy in a multiethnic population in the southwestern United States and found that 31% of 2287 unselected individuals had a greater than 5.5% rate of hepatic steatosis. Of these, 79% had normal ALT values.76 A contemporaneous study from a large clinic population in California showed that of 742 individuals with newly diagnosed chronic liver disease, 21.4% had NAFLD.87 NAFLD was found to be the most common cause of incidental liver function test abnormalities (26.4%) in a U.K. prospective primary care cohort of 1118 adults by a combination of ultrasound and biomarker assays; ALD was a close second (25.3%). Of the NAFLD cases, 7.6% had evidence of previously undetected advanced fibrosis.91

A U.S. biopsy-based prevalence study of asymptomatic adults found that 46% of 156 adult, unselected patients who had steatosis on ultrasound had NAFLD diagnosed on biopsy. Of the biopsied NAFLD patients, 30% had diagnostic NASH, and 2.7% of those with NASH had advanced fibrosis (≥stage 2). This finding allowed speculation that more than 2 million of the U.S. adult population was at risk for advanced fibrosis because of NASH. These findings led the researchers to conclude that the prevalence of NAFLD was greater than that of hepatitis C and posed a serious concern for the future of health care.92

A study in a predominantly nonaffluent, nonobese population in India represented by 1911 inhabitants of a rural community showed the prevalence of NAFLD diagnosed by ultrasonography and CT to be 8.7%. NASH was seen in 31% of 36 biopsied persons with potentially significant disease, 4 of whom had cirrhosis.93,94

The estimated prevalence rate of NAFLD in the United States is greater than that of ALD (Table 49.4). It may affect as many as 5% of the adult population, with an even higher rate among patients with type 2 diabetes.59 Table 49.5 summarizes several published series focused on histologic documentation of fatty liver in adult autopsies. Correlations between body weight and diabetes were discussed in many of these studies long before the metabolic syndrome was identified as a specific entity. More than one investigator suggested that steatosis was a normal consequence of aging (see Pathogenesis).

Table 49.4

 

Prevalence Estimates of Fatty Liver Disease Compared with Other Chronic Liver Diseases

Disorder Prevalence
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease 25-75% of obese, diabetic adults
16% of 15- to 19-yr-old adolescents
38% of obese adolescents
Hepatitis C 1.3-2.0%
Alcohol-induced liver disease 1%
Hepatitis B 0.3-0.4%
Hereditary hemochromatosis 1/200-400 of northern European descent
Autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis 9-17/100,000
α1-Antitrypsin deficiency 1/1500-7600
Wilson disease 1/30,000

Data from McCullough AJ. Pathophysiology of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40(suppl 1):S17-S29 and Yu AS, Keeffe EB. Elevated AST or ALT to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: accurate predictor of disease prevalence? Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:955-956.

 

Table 49.5

 

Prevalence of Fatty Liver Disease in Autopsy Studies

Study Population Studied (N) Prevalence of Fatty Liver Associated Features
Hilden et al, 1977277 Motor vehicle accident victims; adults (503) 24% overall
0.5% had features of alcoholic hepatitis
Age: 1% < 20 yr
18% 20-40 yr
39% > 60 yr
Overweight: associated with steatosis, not age
Underwood Ground, 1982278 Aircrew, accidental deaths, all men (199) 15.6% overall
2.1% had features of alcoholic hepatitis
All healthy; none had overt alcoholism
Hornboll and Olsen, 1982279 678 Consecutive autopsies, all > 20 yr of age (396 with alcohol and other exclusions) 54% overall
43% had < 33%
11% had > 33%
Age: no association after 40 yr
Overweight: strong association with degree of fatty change; diabetic people were more common in this group
Diabetes not independently associated
Underwood Ground, 1984280 Aircraft, motor vehicle accidents, all men; all accidents associated with alcohol, other illnesses excluded (166) 21% Questioned possible irregular use of alcohol as factor; discussed increased carbohydrate intake relationship to fatty liver disease
Wanless, 1990176 Hospitalized, 207 obese patients, 144 matched, nonobese controls; alcoholic patients excluded (351) Steatosis: 36.3% overall, 29.2 obese, 7.1% lean
Steatohepatitis: 18.5% obese, 2.7% lean
Overweight: prevalence and grade of steatosis and steatohepatitis correlated with grade of obesity
Diabetes: increased the risk of steatohepatitis and fibrosis
Schwimmer et al, 2006231 Consecutive pediatric and adolescent autopsies in a single county, nonselected (742) Steatosis: 13% overall
2-4 yr: 0.7%
15-19 yr: 17.3%
Age: fatty liver incidence increased with age
Obesity: 38% had fatty liver
Ethnicity: Hispanic (11.8%), Asian (10.2%), white (8.6%), African American (1.5%)

image

 

In summary, the true prevalence rate of NAFLD remains unknown because there are no reliable or specific noninvasive tests available for an accurate diagnosis or exclusion of this process. A review of noninvasive markers in NAFLD, NASH, and fibrosis indicates the efforts in the field.21 Although liver biopsy evaluation is considered the gold standard of diagnostic tests, it cannot be considered an appropriate screening tool. Results from biopsy studies reinforce the observations that not all obese individuals have hepatic steatosis8,95,96 and that unexplained elevated ALT values cannot be assumed to indicate fatty liver disease. For example, Skelly and colleagues97 showed that as many as one third of 354 biopsies performed for unexplained elevated ALT levels were histologically normal or had abnormalities because of liver diseases other than NAFLD or NASH. Recommendations for the focused role of liver biopsy for patients with suspected NAFLD or NASH were discussed in the practice guidelines from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases59 and in a consensus conference of the European Association for the Study of the Liver.69

Familial Associations and Risk Factors

The genetic predispositions found in NAFLD are exemplified by differences in the incidence of other risk factors, such as obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia, among various ethnic populations. Studies have documented fatty liver disease and cirrhosis among kindreds.98 One study of 20 patients showed a trend toward familial clustering and maternal linkage for insulin resistance among patients with NAFLD.99

Type 2 diabetes and obesity are risk factors for progressive disease in clinical100 and histologic studies.8,101,102 Various possible environmental and genetic factors have been proposed for NAFLD,13,103 including the type of diet, exercise, smoking,104 the role of small bowel bacterial overgrowth, endotoxin and related immune or cytokine responses, polymorphisms for genes that control fatty acid oxidation (e.g., microsomal transfer protein), and fibrosis (i.e., angiotensinogen and TGF-β).

Broad, nonexclusive categories of genes under investigation as potential risk factors for NAFLD105 include those involved in the control of adiposity and insulin resistance (e.g., peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-γ [PPAR-γ], central versus peripheral fat depots); determinants of hepatic steatosis (i.e., free fatty acid delivery and de novo lipogenesis, processing, and egress); hepatic fatty acid oxidation pathways (e.g., mitochondrial, peroxisomal, microsomal); hepatic oxidative stress mechanisms (e.g., production, defense); cytokine effects (e.g., TNF-α, IL6, adipokines); and determinants of progression of fibrosis. One genomic and proteomic study of 98 bariatric patients found downregulation of genes involved in defense against oxidative stress in NAFLD cases and upregulation of genes associated with fibrogenesis and apoptosis in steatohepatitis cases.106

Genome-wide association and candidate gene studies have identified a variant in PNPLA3, which encodes adiponutrin, an insulin-responsive phospholipase involved in lipolysis and lipogenesis that correlates with accumulation of hepatic triglyceride and some histologic features of severity of NASH with identical ethnic distributions in prevalence studies.107112 This association is not limited to adults.112,113 The effects cannot be shown to be direct, and it is speculated the allelic variant results in sensitization of the liver to metabolic and environmental stressors.20

Pathogenesis

Certain similarities (i.e., steatosis, oxidative damage, and cytokine response) and dissimilarities between the pathogenesis of NAFLD and ALD are highlighted in Figure 49.17. The most commonly discussed driver of NAFLD is insulin resistance and the associated lipotoxicity (i.e., fat in nonfat depots) and complex pathways of systemic and local inflammation.114 The metabolic system of insulin involves signaling among skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, and liver.115118

image
FIGURE 49.17 Alcohol-induced liver disease and nonalcoholic (obesity and insulin resistance related) fatty liver disease share several pathogenetic processes, which are shown in the overlapping portions of the Venn diagram. Conditions unique to each disease are highlighted in the nonoverlapping sections. CTGF, Connective tissue growth factor; CYP2E1, cytochrome P450 2E1; F, female; FFA, free fatty acids; IL-6, interleukin-6; LPS, lipopolysaccharides; M, male; MEOS, microsomal ethanol-oxidizing system; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TLRs, Toll-like receptors; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; ↑, increased levels.

The manifestations of insulin resistance depend on the type of tissue involved. In visceral adipose tissue, there is unabated release of free fatty acids into portal venous blood. In peripheral muscle, insulin resistance manifests as an inability to use circulating glucose. In liver, continuation of glucose production (i.e., gluconeogenesis) combines with a lack of glycogen storage in the setting of hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia. Hepatic steatosis, which corresponds to an accumulation of triglycerides in hepatocytes, results from an imbalance between the delivery of free fatty acids and endogenous lipogenesis and fatty acid disposal through oxidation and packaging of esterified fatty acids and triglycerides for export by apolipoproteins as very-low-density lipoproteins. Each of these steps involves complex, genetically regulated pathways.

Current work shows that triglyceride accumulation is a mechanism of sequestration of potentially damaging free fatty acids and that nontriglyceride fatty acid metabolites likely drive subsequent necroinflammatory lesions recognized as NASH.119 Our understanding of pathogenesis of NAFLD and NASH also includes the roles of altered gut microbiota,120 intestinal permeability and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) exposure,121 differential macrophage activation in adipose tissue depots,122 innate immunity,123,124 and supporting activation by inflammasomes in obesity-related liver injury.125

Visceral (abdominal) adipose tissue is an energy storage depot and a source of highly active proteins, collectively referred to as adipokines or adipocytokines (Fig. 49.18). In NAFLD, adipokines such as TNF-α (elevated in NAFLD) and adiponectin (decreased in obesity and NAFLD), proinflammatory IL6, proinflammatory and profibrogenic derivatives of the renin-angiotensin system,126 and resistin may be involved in the pathogenesis of NAFLD. Studies have demonstrated production of selected chemokines by the epithelial components of the ductular reaction in advanced NAFLD.127 Leptin, another adipokine produced by peripheral adipose tissue, serves an important function in the control of satiety and appetite and is essential for fibrogenesis. Because of high levels of circulating leptin, NAFLD may represent a condition of central (brain) leptin resistance.

image
FIGURE 49.18 Possible pathways involved in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. FFA, Free fatty acids; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; IL, interleukin; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α. (From Day CP. From fat to inflammation. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:207-210.)

The amount of visceral adipose tissue increases with the age-related loss of estrogens and androgens in women and men. In men, this may be an early step in the alteration of insulin metabolism and progression to the metabolic syndrome.128 In several autopsy studies, increasing patient age correlated with development of hepatic steatosis.

Pathology

Grossly, noncirrhotic fatty livers are typically enlarged and yellow and have a greasy consistency. The cirrhotic liver may be small or enlarged. Fat may be observed in an irregular pattern in liver nodules as yellow areas compared with neighboring tan nodules. Cirrhotic livers in patients with NAFLD may not be as firm, may have the same stroma-to-parenchyma ratio, or may be as micronodular as in ALD.

Features of NAFLD in affected morbidly obese and superobese (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) individuals129 may not be the same as in non–morbidly obese patients. Most objective scientific studies are based on the latter, and the following discussion is based on that population unless stated otherwise.

The histologic injury pattern of noncirrhotic fatty liver disease in adults, regardless of cause, initially involves zone 3 hepatocytes (Fig. 49.19). In cirrhosis, steatosis or steatohepatitis may or may not persist. Table 49.6 outlines the key gross and microscopic features of NAFLD compared with ALD.

image
FIGURE 49.19 Mixed large and small droplet steatosis and mild ballooning are seen in zone 3 in a liver biopsy demonstrating steatohepatitis.

Table 49.6

 

Gross and Histologic Features of Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Patients with or without Cirrhosis

Characteristics Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Patients without Cirrhosis
Gross Features Usually enlarged, soft, yellow, greasy liver May be indistinguishable from noncirrhotic alcohol-induced liver disease
Histologic Features
Macrovesicular steatosis, zonal or diffuse ± (Zone 3 or diffuse) Required: zone 3 or diffuse in adults; diffuse or zone 1 in children
Mixed large and small droplet steatosis ± ±
Nonzonal patches of true microvesicular steatosis ± ±
Steatohepatitis ± ±
Hepatocellular ballooning ± ±
Acidophil bodies + +
Megamitochondria ± ±
Mallory-Denk bodies, zone 3 ± ± (in ballooned hepatocytes when present)
 Thick, ropy More likely Less likely
 Thin, wispy Less likely More likely
 With satellitosis More likely Less likely
Portal chronic inflammation ± ± (may be prominent in resolution)
Portal acute inflammation ± (accompanies ductular reaction, implies cholangiolitis, pancreatitis)
Lipogranulomas, portal or lobular + +
Glycogenated nuclei ± ±
Ductular reaction Periportal, pericentral ±
Iron: hepatocellular, zone 1 > zone 3 ± (may be significant) ± (usually mild)
Iron: RES cells, punctate, panacinar ± ±
Fibrosis: zone 3 perisinusoidal ± ±
 Dense, diffuse More likely Less likely
 Delicate Less likely More likely
Perivenular fibrosis +
Periportal stellate fibrosis + (with ductular reaction, acute inflammation)
Alcoholic foamy degeneration (pure microsteatosis) +
Sclerosing hyaline necrosis, zone 3 +
Veno-occlusive lesions +
Canalicular cholestasis, cholestatic rosettes +
Patients with Cirrhosis
Gross Features Liver firm throughout; may be shrunken or quite large; may be cholestatic; grossly visible foci of parenchymal extinction Not distinguishable from other hepatitic forms of cirrhosis
Histologic Features
May retain or lose active lesions of steatohepatitis + +
May be a cause of cryptogenic cirrhosis + +
Copper deposition, periseptal hepatocytes ± Uncommon
Hepatocellular iron, RES cell iron (patients without HFE mutation) Common ±
α1-Antitrypsin globules; increased MZ phenotype (?) ±

HFE, Hemochromatosis gene; MZ alleles, reduce α1-antitrypsin levels and impair liver function; RES, reticuloendothelial system; +, present; ±, present or absent; −, absent.

 

Steatosis

By definition, steatosis is identified in 100% of NAFLD cases. The minimum criterion for NAFLD is a finding of at least 5% macrosteatosis. In adults, steatosis commonly begins in zone 3 hepatocytes, which contrasts with the zone 1 steatosis in viral hepatitis C (Fig. 49.20) or the panacinar pattern seen in pediatric NAFLD.

image
FIGURE 49.20 In a biopsy specimen from a patient with chronic hepatitis C, steatosis involves predominantly zone 1.

Assessment of the degree of steatosis is often based on a semiquantitative scale by evaluating the percentage involvement of parenchyma, which is expressed as grades. This may also be accomplished by classifying the degree of involvement of the hepatic lobules using three grades (0% to 33%, 33% to 66%, and > 66%130) or by using a four-grade system to account for a 5% normal figure (<5%, 5% to 33%, 34% to 66%, and > 66%).131 Other quantitative methods proposed include digital image analysis,132 morphometry,133 and stereologic point counting134; these approaches are less practical for daily use.

Rarely, steatosis may occur without any inflammation; this condition is called isolated steatosis. More often, there are rare, scattered microgranulomas (i.e., Kupffer cell aggregates) or foci of chronic inflammation in the lobules, which may be called steatosis with inflammation.3 Hepatocellular injury, portal inflammation, and fibrosis raise considerations of additional processes.

Steatohepatitis

The minimal criteria for steatohepatitis are steatosis (≥5%), hepatocellular ballooning, and lobular inflammation (Fig. 49.21). Similar to other forms of chronic liver disease, fibrosis is not required to establish a diagnosis of steatohepatitis. In the initial phases, steatosis is centered in zone 3; with progression, steatosis may involve the entire hepatic lobule. Azonal steatosis may be seen in conjunction with advanced fibrosis.135 Nonzonal patches of microvesicular steatosis may occur in NAFLD (see Fig. 49.13),135 and this correlates with disease severity,136 as do the degree and zonality of steatosis.137

image
FIGURE 49.21 This photomicrograph shows the criteria for steatohepatitis: steatosis, ballooning, and mild lobular inflammation. However, the cause (alcoholic or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease) cannot be determined with certainty.

Several histologic types of hepatocellular injury may be seen with routine stains in specimens from patients with NAFLD. They include ballooned hepatocytes, apoptotic (acidophilic) bodies, or foci of spotty necrosis in which remnants of hepatocytes that have undergone lytic necrosis are surrounded by mononuclear cells and Kupffer cells. Areas of confluent and bridging necrosis are rare in NAFLD, which is rarely a cause of submassive or massive hepatic necrosis.138

Hepatocyte ballooning is considered an essential, albeit challenging, histologic feature of steatohepatitis.7 Ballooned hepatocytes are enlarged hepatocytes with rarefied reticulated cytoplasm and with or without fat droplets and MDBs. Enlarged nuclei are common (see Fig. 49.1). The ballooned cells are located predominantly in zone 3. They are commonly associated with perisinusoidal fibrosis29,130 and secrete profibrogenic factors (see Fig. 49.2).139 Loss of K8 or K18 immunoreactivity with or without ubiquitin staining provides an objective histologic marker for ballooned hepatocytes in steatohepatitis (Fig. 49.22).23,24,29 PMNs may be associated with ballooned hepatocytes that contain MDBs. This satellitosis (see Fig. 49.4) is less common in NAFLD than in ALD. In rare cases, hepatocyte ballooning may occur in the absence of significant steatosis or inflammation.135 Specific immunophenotypes of activated lymphocytes correlate with disease activity.140

image
FIGURE 49.22 Keratin 8 and 18 (K8 and K18) immunohistochemistry highlights ballooned, empty-appearing hepatocytes in steatohepatitis caused by alcoholic or nonalcoholic liver disease, which contrasts with the normal, nonballooned hepatocytes that show cytoplasmic and membranous K8 and K18 immunoreactivity. Large fat droplets push parts of the cytoplasm aside in some steatotic hepatocytes, but the immunohistochemical pattern is not similar to that of ballooning. Mallory-Denk bodies, composed of the misfolded K8 and K18 filaments, stain positively within ballooned hepatocytes.

The number of apoptotic hepatocytes correlates with disease activity.141 Serum and tissue markers of apoptosis are being evaluated as potential noninvasive diagnostic tools for fibrosis and NASH.142 One study of NAFLD showed that positivity for the M30 antibody, which is directed against a caspase 3–cleaved K18 product, was identified in steatohepatitis but not in steatosis or in normal liver biopsies.143

The degree of lobular inflammation in NASH is commonly mild and can be mixed acute and chronic or predominantly chronic. Inflammation results from innate and adaptive immune responses.144 CD68-positive Kupffer cells are increased in zone 3.145 Infrequently, zone 3 chronic inflammation may obscure the outflow vein.135 Scattered lobular microgranulomas and lipogranulomas are commonly observed. The former consist of clusters of Kupffer cells that are positive for periodic acid–Schiff stain with diastase digestion (d-PAS) and CD68; the latter consist of fat droplets surrounded by mononuclear cells or eosinophilic PMNs (see Fig. 49.3). Large portal or perivenular lipogranulomas are common in NAFLD. Lipogranulomas are often associated with a small amount of fibrosis, which should not be included in the assessment of disease stage (discussed later). PMNs may be found in the lobules, and clusters near the terminal hepatic venule are common in surgically obtained biopsies, a condition referred to as surgical hepatitis.146

Mild to moderate portal chronic inflammation may be seen in the active and resolving phases of steatohepatitis (Fig. 49.23).130,147 However, when portal chronic inflammation is disproportionately greater than that in the lobules, the pathologist should suspect a superimposed chronic liver disease, such as chronic viral hepatitis.148,149 Increased portal inflammation in untreated patients with NAFLD correlates with increased histologic activity and clinical severity, and if more than mild, it may be considered a marker of advanced disease.150,151 Interpretation of more than mild portal chronic inflammation in NAFLD warrants seeking clinical information about possible prior treatment and concurrent disease. The finding of portal PMNs and cholangiolitis indicates alcohol-induced liver disease or biliary obstruction.21,37

image
FIGURE 49.23 After 48 weeks of therapy with an insulin-sensitizing agent, this liver biopsy from a patient with biopsy-proven steatohepatitis shows reversal of all lesions of steatohepatitis and prominent portal chronic inflammation.
Fibrosis and Cirrhosis

The characteristic pattern of fibrosis in adult patients with noncirrhotic steatohepatitis is zone 3 pericellular or perisinusoidal (i.e., chicken wire fibrosis), which results from deposition of collagen and extracellular matrix in the space of Disse (see Figs. 49.6 and 49.7). This type of fibrosis may be associated with steatohepatitis, and when found in isolation, it probably suggests healed prior episodes of steatohepatitis. Dense, extensive perisinusoidal fibrosis associated with portal hypertension, as occurs in patients with ALD, has not been described in patients with NAFLD. Diabetic hepatosclerosis, another change that correlates with severe extrahepatic organ damage in patients with type 1 diabetes, is not seen in NASH. It is characterized by patchy, dense perisinusoidal collagen and basement membrane deposition in the absence of steatosis (Fig. 49.24).152 With progression, fibrosis develops in the periportal region (see Fig. 49.9), followed in some cases by bridging fibrosis, which can be in a central-central, central-portal, or portal-portal pattern.

image
FIGURE 49.24 Diabetic hepatosclerosis. All reported cases are from patients with type 1 diabetes and end-organ damage from vascular complications. Note the lack of steatosis.

NAFLD-associated cirrhosis is most commonly macronodular or mixed. After cirrhosis is established, active features of steatohepatitis and perisinusoidal fibrosis may no longer be apparent. This fact has been well documented in studies of serial liver biopsies153 and supports the theory that NAFLD is a major cause of otherwise cryptogenic cirrhosis.154 Nevertheless, in some patients, active steatohepatitis may be observed in cases of established cirrhosis.155

Periportal and bridging fibrosis are accompanied by a ductular reaction,156,157 which consists of a proliferation of K7- and/or K19-positive hepatic progenitor cells, poorly formed ductular structures, increased stromal matrix, and usually mild acute inflammation (Figs. 49.25 and 49.26).158160 Isolated portal fibrosis (i.e., portal or periportal fibrosis without evidence of coexisting zone 3 perisinusoidal fibrosis) has been described in a subset of morbidly obese adults who have undergone bariatric surgery,96,161 but whether this finding represents a lesion within the spectrum of NAFLD common to nonmorbidly obese patients or pathologic resolution of injury in morbidly obese individuals has not been explored.

image
FIGURE 49.25 Projecting from the terminal hepatic venule in the center of the field is a septum with a ductular reaction. This is a common finding in alcohol-induced liver disease (ALD) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. The venule shows subendothelial thickening, which is a characteristic lesion of ALD. Even in this photomicrograph, dense perisinusoidal fibrosis is evident.
image
FIGURE 49.26 Keratin 7 immunohistochemistry highlights the ductular reaction adjacent to expanded portal tracts in the biopsy specimen of stage 2 steatohepatitis. Intermediate hepatocytes are occasionally seen. They are hepatocytes with submembranous keratin 7 positivity. (Courtesy of A. Clouston.)
Other Pathologic Features of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Mallory-Denk Bodies.

In NAFLD, MDBs are usually identified in ballooned hepatocytes, in which they often appear wispy, poorly formed, or delicate. Masson trichrome stain may be used to aid identification of MDBs (see Fig. 49.6). Immunohistochemical staining for K8 or K18 (see Fig. 49.22) ubiquitin may be positive in MDBs.32 Increased numbers of MDBs correlate with higher degrees of necroinflammatory activity in patients with NAFLD130 and confirm the diagnosis of steatohepatitis.60

Megamitochondria.

Megamitochondria (i.e., giant mitochondria) are identified by light microscopy as intracytoplasmic, round or cigar-shaped, eosinophilic structures in hepatocytes. They are often apparent in hepatocytes that also contain microvesicular steatosis (see Fig. 49.13). Ultrastructural studies of patients with NAFLD showed that paracrystalline inclusions, loss of cristae, and nonzonality of megamitochondria are characteristic features of NAFLD.162 Megamitochondria in NASH may represent a pathologic process or an adaptive change.163 Megamitochondria are not unique to ALD or NAFLD and can be seen in Wilson disease and pregnancy.

Iron Deposition.

A mild degree of iron deposition (1+) in periportal or periseptal hepatocytes and punctate reticuloendothelial iron may be identified in as many as 35% of NAFLD patients21 and may be related to the severity of disease.164,165 Iron accumulation is likely the result of dysmetabolic iron overload from altered regulation of iron transport associated with steatosis and insulin resistance.166

Glycogenated Nuclei.

Glycogenated nuclei are clear, vacuolated nuclei that are frequently found in NAFLD. They may occur as clusters of cells in zone 1 or scattered in the hepatocyte lobules.167 Glycogenated nuclei are also common in diabetes, Wilson disease, and normal liver biopsies from children. Glycogenated nuclei are of uncertain clinical significance,168 but they may indicate hepatocyte senescence.169

Ductular Reaction.

Ductular reaction is a result of most forms of acute or chronic liver injury.159 In NASH, the process correlates with the amount of portal-based fibrosis. The lesion has been associated with insulin resistance and with hepatocellular156 and ductular senescence.157,160 The ductular reaction is a metabolically active process157,160 that produces profibrogenic cytokines.127 An extensive ductular reaction accompanied by other features of chronic cholestasis, such as feathery degeneration of periportal hepatocytes, abundant deposition of periportal copper, or bile duct injury, should alert the pathologist to the possibility of a superimposed chronic biliary disease.

Hepatocellular Glycogen.

Hepatocellular glycogen can accumulate in the cytoplasm in NAFLD. Glycogen imparts a dull, grayish refractile appearance to the cytoplasm; this may occur in conjunction with steatosis or megamitochondria. In contrast to diffuse involvement by glycogenic hepatopathy, a process that occurs in poorly controlled type 1 diabetes (Fig. 49.27),170,171 the histologic change in NAFLD may affect only focal groups of hepatocytes.

image
FIGURE 49.27 Glycogenic hepatopathy is characterized by diffuse involvement of hepatocytes with cytoplasmic glycogen deposition. There may be foci of macrovesicular steatosis, but this pattern is normally mild. This finding is most common in patients with type 1 diabetes.
Vascular Alterations.

A small intraacinar arteriolar branch in perivenular areas in zone 3 that was observed in NASH correlated with disease severity. When associated with dense perivenular inflammation, the lack of a visible bile duct helps to avoid misinterpretation of the lesion as an inflamed portal tract.172

Treatment Effects.

Resolution of steatosis, ballooning, lobular inflammation, steatohepatitis, fibrosis, and a decrease in the NAFLD activity score (NAS) have been reported as potential positive effects of treatment (e.g., diet and exercise, medical, surgical) in various clinical trials (see Fig. 49.23).173 Clinical trials have produced two additional observations—spontaneous resolution of the histologic features of NAFLD may occur, and even after clinically successful treatment, the degree of portal inflammation may increase.174 Laboratory values147 and histologic findings175 may provide evidence of recurrence several weeks after cessation of successful medical therapy, indicating the underlying systemic nature of the process.

Prognostic Lesions.

Table 49.7 summarizes the results of clinicopathologic studies that have correlated the histologic features of NAFLD with fibrosis.155,176180 Using immunohistochemistry for activated hepatic stellate cells, others have demonstrated a correlation with advanced fibrosis in NAFLD biopsies.181183 Practical application of this test awaits further validation. A meta-analysis of studies done with various methods identified lobular inflammation as a prognostic feature for fibrosis.179 Portal chronic inflammation is associated with advanced disease histologically and clinically.150,151 Other studies have highlighted microvesicular steatosis or the amount and location of steatosis.136,137 One immunohistochemical study highlighted the loss of K8 and K18 and positivity for ubiquitin in hepatocytes, which are markers of ballooning, as correlative with fibrosis.29

Table 49.7

 

Histologic Features of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Reportedly Associated with Fibrosis or Cirrhosis

Study N Steatosis Lobular Inflammation Ballooning/Mallory-Denk Bodies Other
Wanless, 1990176 207 Yes NA NA/NA
Matteoni et al, 19993 98 Yes Yes Yes/yes
Angulo et al, 1999101 144 No No Yes
George et al, 1998177 51 Yes Yes NA Stainable iron; C282Y HFE mutation
Shimada et al, 2002155 81 Yes No Yes
Ratziu et al, 2000178 93/14* Yes Yes (with polymorphonuclear cells) Yes Four progressors: no evidence of portal fibrosis in first biopsy; necroinflammation in progressors only
Garcia-Monzon et al, 2000281 46 Yes Yes NA
Gramlich et al, 2004282 132 Yes Yes Yes/yes
Fassio et al, 2004283 106/22* No No NA Steatosis decreased or no change with fibrosis progression
Adams et al, 2005194 103/103* No No No/no Low initial fibrosis stage associated with higher rate of progression
Ekstedt et al, 2006195 129/68* Yes (in first biopsy) No No/no 100% negative predictive value for progression when less than stage 2 in first biopsy

image

* Repeat biopsies.

HFE, Hemochromatosis gene; NA, not applicable.

 

There is strong interest in the development of serum biomarkers and noninvasive imaging tests to diagnose NASH and establish fibrosis in NAFLD.184 In patients with NAFLD, the metabolic syndrome was identified as a marker of histologic activity.185 Common features to many studies are older age, diabetes mellitus, degree of insulin resistance, and elevated aminotransferase levels in morbidly obese and nonmorbidly obese populations.8,178,179,186,187 The ratio of PMNs to lymphocytes correlates with histologic activity and fibrosis in liver biopsies.188

A proteomic approach has shown weight-dependent variations in diagnosed NAFLD and NASH.189 A meta-analysis of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) studies has shown that the I148M variant of the PNPLA3 gene is associated with increased histologic severity and fibrosis in NAFLD.20 This area of investigation will continue to grow because liver biopsy is not a practical screening approach.

Natural History and Treatment

Long-term studies of the natural history of NAFLD are challenging and few, but most authorities agree that steatosis alone is nonprogressive,190 whereas fibrosis progresses in 31% to 42% of individuals during a period of 3.2 to 13.7 years to cirrhosis and its complications of liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma.191193 In other patients, fibrosis remains stable or regresses.194,195 Some patients have had regression of NASH to NAFLD (i.e., steatosis) without specific treatment196 or after weight reduction.180

The literature is mixed in terms of the effect of NAFLD on overall survival. Some studies have shown no difference compared with the general population for individuals with cirrhosis from other forms of chronic liver disease.195,197 In contrast, studies from multiple countries have shown that patients with NAFLD have a worse overall survival rate.191,194,198 Compared with patients with advanced chronic hepatitis C, patients with NAFLD with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis have lower rates of liver-related complications and hepatocellular carcinoma197 but similar overall mortality rates.199 Obesity,101 increasing patient age,101,178 and diabetes8,101,102,200 are risk factors for progression of steatosis to steatohepatitis or cirrhosis. Caffeine consumption is protective against the development of fibrosis.201,202 Cardiovascular disease may be the leading cause of death of patients with advanced NAFLD.195,203,204

Whether nonfibrotic, non-NASH NAFLD is necessarily a precursor that progresses or steatosis and NASH with fibrosis are separate entities is debated.119 Among patients with steatosis, only 2% to 20% have steatohepatitis or cirrhosis.92 Moreover, Cirrhosis (15% to 25%), liver failure, or hepatocellular carcinoma do not develop in all patients with steatohepatitis.205,206 Many succumb to cardiovascular complications.203

Problems related to biopsy sampling errors and the various definitions of steatosis, steatohepatitis, and NAFLD have created difficulties in natural history studies. NASH-related cirrhosis or liver failure is the third most common indication for liver transplantation in the United States (9.7% in 2009) and is on a trajectory to becoming the number one indication.207 NASH cirrhosis accounts for 30% to 40% of liver-related deaths,208 whereas steatosis without steatohepatitis or cirrhosis is considered a more benign process.192,194

The risk of hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with NASH is not always recognized in general practice,209 but it is a growing concern.4,205,206 Although it is lower than that for HCV-related cirrhosis in comparative series,197,210,211 screening only cirrhotics is recognized as inadequate, and several groups have reported hepatocellular carcinoma in noncirrhotic patients.4,206,212,213 Benign liver tumors such as adenoma and adenomatosis have been reported for patients with various degrees of NAFLD.214,215

Trials of NAFLD treatment have not been a great success, with the possible exception of weight loss surgery.216 Less drastic therapy and trials are aimed primarily at the presumed causes of disease and have included lifestyle intervention with weight loss and exercise, control of insulin sensitivity, and interventions broadly directed at inflammation, hepatocyte injury and fibrosis, and hyperlipidemia. Several reviews detail the trials and results.59,217,218

Some common forms of drug intervention include the insulin-sensitizing PPAR-γ agonist pioglitazone with or without antioxidants; antidiabetic drugs such as metformin and thiazolidinediones; the antioxidants betaine, ursodeoxycholic acid, vitamins E and C; antifibrotic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and receptor blockers; and the TNF-α antagonist pentoxifylline.

Fatty Liver Disease in Various Patient Groups

Concurrent Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

The coexistence of NAFLD and ALD has been recognized as a significant risk factor for progression.219 However, the overlapping contributory components cannot be histologically separated.

Alcohol use by individuals with NAFLD remains controversial. Modest alcohol intake protects against the effects of insulin resistance in morbidly obese individuals8 and is associated with a decreased prevalence of steatohepatitis in nonmorbidly obese patients with NAFLD.9 However, moderate alcohol consumption correlates with progression of fibrosis in NAFLD.220

Fatty Liver Disease in Patients with Other Liver Disorders

Clinical complications of acute viral hepatitis A, B, and C; chronic hepatitis C; and acetaminophen toxicity are seen in patients with alcoholism. These disorders require careful consideration by the pathologist when examining liver biopsy material with unusual findings.

The outcome and histologic features of ALD with concurrent acute viral hepatitis depend on the stage of ALD. Acetaminophen toxicity may not result in the characteristic features of zone 3 bridging necrosis in patients with ALD. The effects of chronic HCV infection are synergistic with those of fibrosis in patients with ALD.18 The histologic features of superimposed hepatitis caused by HCV are similar to those seen in nonalcoholic patients (see Chapter 46). Patients with ALD are also at risk for chronic pancreatitis and biliary obstruction, both of which may manifest histologically with cholangiolitis. The coexistence of ALD with hereditary hepatic iron overload and with α1-antitrypsin deficiency results in findings typical of those disorders in addition to those of ALD.

The coexistence of NAFLD with other chronic liver diseases is a growing area of interest because of the high prevalence of NAFLD and its possible influence on the progression of other liver diseases; the high prevalence of chronic HCV infection; the high incidence of steatosis among patients with HCV infection; and the challenges of diagnosing NAFLD in the setting of other chronic liver disorders.148,149,221 Several studies have shown a negative impact of steatosis and insulin resistance on the progression of disease in patients with HCV infection or hereditary hemochromatosis.222 In one series, 2.6% of more than 3000 nonallograft liver biopsies identified steatohepatitis (i.e., steatosis and zone 3 perisinusoidal fibrosis) with a non-ALD or non-NAFLD type of chronic liver disease, such as hepatitis C, hemochromatosis, α1-antitrypsin deficiency, or autoimmune hepatitis.148

Chronic hepatitis C is the most common chronic liver disease diagnosed with concurrent NASH (5% to 9% of chronic hepatitis C cases).148,223 Criteria for the diagnosis of NASH with chronic hepatitis C have not been established, but one recommendation relies on the unique characteristic of NASH zone 3 perisinusoidal fibrosis and hepatocyte ballooning with a zone 3 predilection in addition to steatosis and lobular inflammation.129,148

Rarely, clinical and histologic features of autoimmune hepatitis or primary biliary cirrhosis may be seen in patients with NAFLD.148 Diagnosis of these types of concurrent liver disorders requires more than elevated levels of serum autoantibodies (Fig. 49.28).66

image
FIGURE 49.28 In this biopsy, the abundance of plasma cells in the portal tracts and at the interface in conjunction with positive staining for antinuclear antibodies and an elevated value for total proteins confirms the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis in an obese woman. Other features of steatohepatitis and zone 3 perisinusoidal fibrosis were seen. The diagnosis rendered in this case was combined steatohepatitis and autoimmune hepatitis.

Fatty Liver Disease in Children

A variety of childhood genetic disorders are characterized by hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, and chronic liver injury. They include Bardet-Biedl, Alström, and Prader-Willi syndromes; lipodystrophy; and polycystic ovary syndrome.116 Histologic evaluation alone cannot define the cause of fatty liver disease in these cases. Other childhood disorders characterized by steatosis include HCV infection, rapid weight loss or starvation, and inborn errors of metabolism (e.g., urea cycle deficiency, fatty acid oxidation defects, organic acidemia, carnitine deficiency, cystic fibrosis, Wilson disease).

The growing epidemic of childhood obesity has led to increases in the prevalence of obesity-related conditions such as the metabolic syndrome.224,225 NAFLD, which strongly correlates with components of the metabolic syndrome such as visceral adiposity and insulin resistance,81,226 is considered the most common cause of chronic liver disease in children throughout the world.124 The prevalence of NAFLD among children increases with age, and it is higher among adolescent children.227 Changes in sex hormones, insulin sensitivity, and adipose tissue distribution and function228 during development and increased control over unhealthy food choices and increased sedentary lifestyle with age are considered influential factors.229 Equally disturbing for long-term liver disease is the convergence of binge alcohol drinking and adolescent obesity, both of which are increasing.230

A retrospective histologic study of autopsy livers from 742 unexplained deaths in individuals 2 to 19 years of age documented fatty liver disease in 13% overall, which corresponded to 17.3% of children in the 15- to 19-year age range and 38% of obese children.231 The prevalence of fatty liver disease in children varied according to ethnicity: Hispanic (11.8%), Asian (10.2%), white (8.6%), and African American (1.5%).231 This difference could be explained by the genetic background because a common variant of the PNPLA3 gene that is associated with NAFLD in obese children is more common in Hispanics than African Americans.113,232 NAFLD may result in cirrhosis in as many as 5% of affected children,21 and it is associated with shorter survival compared with age- and gender-matched control populations.233

The histologic features of pediatric NAFLD, especially in the younger children, are different from those of adults (Fig. 49.29).234,235 This fact has been documented repeatedly in studies from the United States,234 Europe,236 and Japan.237 For instance, compared with adults, liver biopsies from children with NAFLD show a predominance of portal-based chronic inflammation and fibrosis; more severe, predominantly panacinar (or zone 1) steatosis; lack of ballooning and MDBs; and lack of zone 3 perisinusoidal fibrosis.21 This pattern of injury was identified in 51% of patients in a study by Schwimmer and colleagues,234 who coined the term type 2 (pediatric-type) NAFLD. The histologic pattern of disease characterized by zone 3 accentuation of steatosis was called type 1 (adult-type) NAFLD and was found in only 17% of cases.234 The remainder of cases showed overlapping histologic features (Table 49.8).

image
FIGURE 49.29 Fatty liver disease in a 10-year-old boy is characterized by relative sparing of zone 3 and obvious enlargement of the portal tract. The steatosis is uniformly macrovesicular. No ballooning is seen.

Table 49.8

 

Histologic Features of Adult and Pediatric Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Histologic Feature Adults Children
Zone 3 predominance of histologic lesions +
Portal predominance of histologic lesions +
Steatosis + +++
Lobular inflammation + ±
Portal inflammation ± + in most cases
Ballooning ±
Mallory-Denk bodies + ±
Portal fibrosis * + in most cases
Glycogenated nuclei ± ±
Zone 3 perisinusoidal fibrosis ±

* Isolated portal fibrosis occasionally is observed in morbidly obese adult patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

+, Present; +++, present and usually severe; ±, present or absent; −, absent.

 

In the study, the type 2 pattern of NAFLD was more common among obese boys, younger individuals, and those of nonwhite ethnicity.234 The switch of the histologic phenotype to an adult pattern in older children may reflect hormonal or endocrine changes related to puberty.227 Further studies from Italy236 and the United States238 confirmed that only a minority of pediatric NAFLD biopsies (2.4% and 6.2%, respectively) showed a zone 3 pattern of steatosis. However, in the same studies, 28.6% and 6.9%, respectively, had the portal-based (type 2) pattern of disease. Most patients (as many as 82% in the U.S. study) had overlapping features.236,238

The NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN) uses the diagnostic categories of definite steatohepatitis, borderline zone 1, borderline zone 3, and not steatohepatitis to cover diagnostic possibilities in NAFLD.135 The two borderline categories are broad enough to apply to pediatric biopsies. Hepatic progenitor cell activation and adipokine secretion by these same cells correlate with disease severity and portal-based fibrosis in pediatric NAFLD.127 Features of NAFLD in children and adults are summarized in Table 49.9.

Table 49.9

 

Clinical Features of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Adults and Children

Feature Adults Children Comments
Metabolic syndrome* + + Sometimes called insulin resistance syndrome or syndrome X
Gender: M > F Probably + Previously thought that F > M among adults
Central obesity + + Central obesity is a greater risk because of various metabolic properties of visceral adipose tissue
Insulin resistance (calculated) or type 2 diabetes + + Linked to central obesity; in Asians, obesity measurements reflect different body habitus than in Westerners
Low adiponectin levels + + Nearly a universal association with NAFLD when assayed; adiponectin is lower in obese individuals with NAFLD compared with obese controls without NAFLD (adult and pediatric studies)
Ethnicity: Hispanic, Asian, white > African American + + Several large series with different assays have confirmed these findings; poorly understood
Polycystic ovary syndrome + + Linked to insulin resistance
Lipodystrophy syndromes, acquired, congenital, and familial; generalized and partial + + Some forms of lipodystrophy because of leptin deficiency, some to PPAR-γ mutations, and some acquired; all are characterized by different degrees and locations of subcutaneous fat loss, insulin resistance, acanthosis nigricans, polycystic ovary syndrome, and hepatic steatosis or steatohepatitis
Acanthosis nigricans Rare case reports + (common) Skin condition directly linked to insulin resistance
Sleep apnea + Possible but not studied Studies link sleep apnea to obesity, hypoxic events, and insulin resistance.
Pituitary or hypothalamic dysfunction + + Includes postsurgical or posttraumatic injury; adult-onset growth hormone deficiency
Petrochemical exposure + Well-documented case series from Brazil with biopsy evidence, rechallenge and long-term follow-up; insulin resistance in only 27% of cases
Autoantibodies (ANA, ASMA, AMA)§ ± Not reported ANA is most commonly documented (6-34%); AMA in 2% in only one series; ANA and ASMA in 0.4-15%

image

* Metabolic syndrome as defined by the Adult Treatment Panel III.

 Insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and obesity are associated features.

 May occur in HIV-positive subjects treated with protease inhibitors. For review of lipodystrophies, see Walker UA, Schott M, Schebaum WA, et al. Acquired and inherited lipodystrophies. N Engl J Med, 2004;351:103-104.

§ Topic reviewed in Brunt EM. Pathology of fatty liver disease. Mod Pathol. 2007;20(suppl 1):S40-S48.

AMA, Antimitochondrial antibody; ANA, antinuclear antibody; ASMA, anti–smooth muscle antibody; F, females; M, males; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; PPAR-γ, peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-γ; +, present; ±, present or absent; −, absent.

 

Differentiating Alcohol-Induced from Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

A clinical model was developed to help distinguish ALD from NAFLD based on a variety of parameters, such as mean corpuscular volume, AST/ALT ratio, BMI, and gender. An ALD/NAFLD index (ANI) greater than 0 favors ALD, whereas an ANI less than 0 favors NAFLD.239 The same group proposed the use of immunohistochemical markers. Decreased expression of the insulin receptor and increased expression of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTPN1), a protein that acts as a negative regulator of insulin resistance, was demonstrated in patients with NAFLD compared with those with ALD.240 Neither the clinical model nor the immunohistochemical marker combination have been validated.

Table 49.6 highlights some of the pathologic differences of ALD and NAFLD. Some data suggest that the degree of steatohepatitis is often more severe in ALD than in NAFLD. Numerous MDBs, increased lobular infiltration by PMNs with satellitosis, and acute cholestasis are features more suggestive of ALD than NAFLD.2,241,242 Reliable clinical information is ultimately essential in distinguishing ALD from NAFLD. Figure 49.30 shows their shared and distinct histologic features.

image
FIGURE 49.30 The Venn diagram highlights the shared (overlapping) and distinct (nonoverlapping) histologic features of alcohol-induced liver disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. CT, Computed tomography; RES, reticuloendothelial system; US, ultrasound.

Features That Occur More Frequently in Alcoholic Liver Disease

Sclerosing hyaline necrosis, obliterative and inflammatory lesions of the hepatic outflow veins, alcoholic foamy degeneration, and acute cholestasis have been described in noncirrhotic ALD but not in patients with noncirrhotic NAFLD.129 In contrast to NAFLD, alcoholic hepatitis may occur in the absence of steatosis in ALD.21 Portal lipogranulomas are common in ALD.30 In cirrhosis caused by ALD, regions of parenchymal extinction (septa) are often quite broad, in contrast to cirrhosis caused by NAFLD (see Fig. 49.10).

Features That Occur More Frequently In Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

In comparative histologic studies, features that occur significantly more often in NAFLD than in ALD include marked steatosis, periportal hepatocellular glycogenated nuclei,36,243 and lipogranulomas.243 However, on an individual basis, the specificity of these histologic features is questionable. There may also be qualitative differences in the type of collagen deposition in NAFLD or ALD. For instance, type I collagen is more common in NAFLD-associated steatohepatitis, whereas type III collagen is more common in ALD.243

Grading and Staging of Fatty Liver Disease

A proposal for a novel histologic score with prognostic value for alcoholic hepatitis is based on the semiquantitative assessment of histologic parameters that are independently associated with short-term survival. They include lobular infiltration by PMNs, bilirubinostasis, megamitochondria, and stage of fibrosis. The score has been validated in two independent cohorts from Europe and the UnitedStates.244

Another study proposed a histologic grading system with predictive ability for alcoholic steatohepatitis based on semiquantification of hepatocyte ballooning and lobular inflammation, but it awaits validation.47 Although no formal semiquantitative pathologic scoring system has been accepted, adaptation of a system used in NAFLD may be applied to ALD.30,37

One popular semiquantitative grading and staging system for assessment of histologic lesions in NASH is based on evaluation of necroinflammatory activity and fibrosis, respectively130 (Tables 49.10 and 49.11). This grading system is based on a semiquantitative evaluation of the degree of steatosis, hepatocyte ballooning, and lobular and portal inflammation. The staging system takes into account the specific pattern of fibrosis unique to NAFLD and concomitant vascular architectural alterations.

Table 49.10

 

Brunt Grading System for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Lesion Grade Significant Histologic Variables
Steatosis Ballooning Inflammation
Mild (grade 1) 1-2 Minimal Lobular: 1-2 Portal: 0-1
Moderate (grade 2) 2-3 Mild Lobular: 1-2 Portal: 1-2
Severe (grade 3) 2-3 Marked Lobular: 3 Portal: 1-2
Extent of Steatosis (1-3) Extent of Lobular Inflammation (0-3) Extent of Portal Inflammation (0-3)
1 ≤ 33% 0 None 0 None
2 33-66% 1 <2 foci/20× field 1 Mild
3 ≥ 66% 2 2-4 foci/20× field 2 Moderate
3 >4 foci/20× field 3 Marked

imageimage

From Brunt EM, Janney CG, Di Bisceglie AM, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Bacon BR. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a proposal for grading and staging the histological lesions. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:2467-2474.

 

Table 49.11

 

Brunt Staging System for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Stage Zone 3 Perisinusoidal Fibrosis Periportal Fibrosis Bridging Fibrosis Cirrhosis
1 Focal or extensive
2 Focal or extensive Focal or extensive
3 ± ± +
4 ± ± Extensive +

image

+, Present; ±, present or absent; −, absent.

From Brunt EM, Janney CG, Di Bisceglie AM, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Bacon BR. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a proposal for grading and staging the histological lesions. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:2467-2474.

 

The NASH CRN, a multicenter consortium sponsored by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, proposed and validated a feature-based scoring system for use in clinical trials (Table 49.12).131 The necroinflammatory grade is referred to as the NAFLD activity score (NAS). The NAS combines the unweighted scores of three individual histologic features: steatosis (0-3), ballooning (0-2), and lobular inflammation (0-2). The total score (0-8) encompasses the entire spectrum of NAFLD, from steatosis to steatohepatitis. Staging subdivides early fibrosis as follows: 1a for delicate zone 3 perisinusoidal fibrosis, 1b for dense zone 3 perisinusoidal fibrosis, and 1c for portal-only fibrosis, specifically for pediatric NAFLD and some cases of bariatric NAFLD. A concurrent validation study confirmed that a diagnosis of steatohepatitis correlated with a NAS of greater than 5 in most cases.

Table 49.12

 

NASH Clinical Research Network Scoring System for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Steatosis Grade Lobular Inflammation Hepatocellular Ballooning
Fibrosis*
0 <5% 0 None 0 None
1 5-33% 1 <2 foci/20× field 1 Mild (few)
2 34-66% 2 2-4 foci/20× field 2 Moderate-marked (many)
3 >66% 3 >4 foci/20× field
NAFLD Activity Score (NAS)
0-8 NAS = steatosis grade + inflammation grade + ballooning grade
Fibrosis Score*
0 None
1a Mild (delicate) zone 3 perisinusoidal fibrosis, requires Masson trichrome stain to identify
1b Moderate (dense) zone 3 perisinusoidal fibrosis
1c Portal fibrosis only
2 Zone 3 perisinusoidal fibrosis with periportal fibrosis
3 Bridging fibrosis
4 Cirrhosis

* Based on the use of Masson trichrome histochemical stain.

NAFLD, Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

Data from Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;41:1313-1321.

 

NAS has been validated outside the CRN in a retrospective study of liver biopsies from adults with NAFLD.245 The use of the NAS for prediction of subsequent fibrosis has been questioned.246 The numbers generated by NAS were not meant to be a substitute for a histologic diagnosis made by a pathologist.131 Results from a NASH CRN study of 976 adult patients with NAFLD have shown that the diagnoses of definite NASH and semiquantitative NAS are distinct, with correlative but separate meanings, as are the classification systems for grading and staging chronic hepatitis.247 A recently developed scoring system (SAF score) allowing the use of an algorithm (FLIP algorithm)247a for the classification of liver injury in morbid obesity has been validated for use in NAFLD of diverse etiology.247b

Sampling error is an important issue in the histologic diagnosis and semiquantitative assessment of NAFLD.248,249 For example, studies that evaluated biopsies from the right lobe248 or from different lobes95 showed excellent concordance for the grade of steatosis, moderate concordance for assessment of the degree of fibrosis, and fair agreement for the degree of necroinflammatory features. In NASH, as in chronic viral hepatitis,250 the length of the tissue core affects the diagnostic yield, with definite NASH more commonly diagnosed and more extensive steatosis, lobular inflammation, and fibrosis observed in longer than shorter samples.251 Needle diameter also is important.249 Features of NAFLD, especially the degree of necroinflammation and fibrosis, may not be distributed uniformly throughout the liver parenchyma. Pathologists should encourage clinical colleagues to obtain adequate cores of liver tissue and preferably multiple cores. Caution is warranted in interpreting surgically obtained biopsies because the inflammatory foci of PMNs (i.e., surgical hepatitis) render semiquantitative assessment of inflammation challenging.96,146

Four histologic reproducibility studies that assessed interobserver and intraobserver variability in NAFLD in adults have shown good to excellent kappa scores for evaluation of the extent of steatosis, finding of perisinusoidal fibrosis, and degree of fibrosis.131,247b,252,253 In all four studies, the degree of lobular inflammation showed the lowest level of agreement, which is similar to the results of reproducibility studies of patients with chronic hepatitis.254 One study evaluated interobserver and intraobserver variability between a community general pathologist and an experienced hepatopathologist by using the NASH CRN scoring system. Although there was good intraobserver agreement, only fair to good agreement for steatosis, lobular inflammation, and a definite diagnosis of NASH and poor agreement for ballooning and fibrosis staging were found.255 As in chronic hepatitis C, the level of experience of pathologists may play a role in variability.256,247b

Other Forms of Fatty Liver Disease

Drug- and Toxin-Induced Fatty Liver Disease

Less than 2% of cases of steatohepatitis are estimated to be attributable to drug exposure.6 In some instances, presumed drug-related steatohepatitis may be a manifestation of an underlying preexisting disorder. Table 49.13 lists some of the manifestations of fatty liver in non-ALD, non-NAFLD settings. Wilson disease may result in some or all of the histopathologic manifestations of NAFLD or NASH in any age group.

Table 49.13

 

Fatty Liver Cases Reported in Non-ALD, Non-NAFLD Clinical Settings

Clinical Setting and Medications Mechanisms Pathologic Findings
Steatosis* Steatohepatitis Fibrosis/Cirrhosis
Medications
 Nifedipine Many patients also have features of MS +
 Diltiazem +
 Coralgil +
 Tamoxifen + + +/+
 Estrogens +
 Corticosteroids +
 Methotrexate + + (periportal)/+
 Highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-positive patients Lipodystrophy and IR are common; drugs may also cause mitochondrial damage ++ +
 Amiodarone Interference with mitochondrial respiration + (and phospholipidosis, cholestasis, zone 1) ± (Mallory-Denk bodies) + (periportal)
Toxins, industrial solvents ± IR and MS + (often zone 1) ± +
Childhood syndromes (Bardet-Biedl, Alström, Prader-Willi) Each includes insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia + + +/+
Allograft liver (de novo or recurrent disease) Rejection therapy; inactivity; not well studied + + +/+
Starvation, protein-calorie malnutrition (Kwashiorkor) Complex pathophysiologic process of lipids and carbohydrates + (zone 1)
Other nutritional disorders (anorexia, bulimia, cachexia, massive weight loss; pancreatic insufficiency) ± IR and MS + + Possibly
Inflammatory bowel disease Abnormal nutritional states +
Celiac disease Controversial + ± Portal fibrosis, cirrhosis
Lipoprotein disorders Disorders of lipoprotein metabolism +
Liver diseases
 HCV May cause IR or hepatic steatosis; may be caused by host and/or viral factors + (as many as 70%; more common in genotype 3) + (as a concurrent disease process) +/+ (as a concurrent disease superimposed on HCV)
 HBV Not known to cause IR or MS ±
 HDV (Labrea hepatitis)
 Wilson disease ++
 Tyrosinemia +
 Galactosemia +
Metabolic or endocrine disorders Complex mechanisms not necessarily related to IR +
 Hypothyroidism
 Hereditary fructose intolerance
 Cystinuria
Miscellaneous (ischemia, hepatic regeneration, aging) Not well known + (often zone 1)

image

* Steatohepatitis usually includes steatosis and inflammation and may include ballooning and fibrosis.

ALD, Alcohol-induced liver disease; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus, HDV, hepatitis D virus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IR, insulin resistance; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; MS, metabolic syndrome; −, does not occur; +, occurs uncommonly; ++, common; +++, very common; ±, may or may not occur.

 

Direct hepatotoxicity or mitochondrial injury resulting in steatohepatitis or phospholipidosis has been reported with the use of cardiac medications such as Coralgil, amiodarone, nifedipine, and diltiazem. Tamoxifen and related drugs for breast cancer, estrogens, and corticosteroids can aggravate obesity-related hyperinsulinemia or lipid abnormalities. Methotrexate-induced steatosis may be exacerbated by obesity. The drug’s role in causing steatohepatitis is no longer controversial because the pattern of fibrosis caused by methotrexate is typically periportal, not pericentral, and other common features of steatohepatitis, such as ballooning and MDBs, are not usually associated with this agent. Toxins other than alcohol that may result in steatosis or steatohepatitis include industrial solvents (e.g., paint thinners), petrochemicals, aflatoxins, arsenic compounds, amanitin, rapeseed cooking oil, and cocaine.21

Fatty Liver Disease after Transplantation

ALD and NAFLD may occur in the allograft liver as a recurrence of the original disease or in the form of de novo liver disease. For patients with ALD who continue to drink alcohol after transplantation, the full range of symptoms may occur.257

Determination of de novo or recurrent disease related to NAFLD is more complex. Steatosis may recur in 25% to 100% of patients who undergo transplantation for NASH-related cirrhosis or cryptogenic cirrhosis. NASH recurs in 4% to 37% of these cases and progresses to advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in some.258260 De novo steatohepatitis may occur in allograft livers, and in some affected patients, steatohepatitis may progress to advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis.261,262 Risk factors are similar to those for patients not undergoing transplantation. In concert with decreased physical activity levels, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia play a role in the development of fatty liver disease after transplantation.207,263

The risks of transplantation include the effects of systemic immunosuppression. For instance, bolus treatment with corticosteroids is a well-recognized risk factor for fatty liver disease in transplant recipients. Other antirejection agents, such as cyclosporine, are diabetogenic and promote hypertension and hypercholesterolemia.261 Recurrent HCV infection promotes insulin resistance and steatosis. The high frequency of steatosis (≤88%) and steatohepatitis among patients who undergo liver transplantation for cryptogenic cirrhosis favors NAFLD as a major cause of cryptogenic cirrhosis in the general population.259,264

Protein-Energy Malnutrition

Hepatic steatosis occurs only in the most severe form of protein-calorie starvation, such as kwashiorkor, a disease that primarily affects the visceral protein compartments of the body. Marasmus affects the somatic (skeletal muscle) protein compartments, but the liver is not affected. In kwashiorkor, steatosis develops initially in periportal (zone 1) hepatocytes and may progress to involve the entire acinus in severe cases. On reintroduction of appropriate dietary protein, zone 3 steatosis is the first to resolve. Necroinflammatory lesions, fibrosis, and cirrhosis do not occur in the absence of concomitant liver disease. Steatohepatitis is also highly unusual in this disorder.1

Some types of dietary disorders, such as anorexia, bulimia, cachexia, massive (rapid) weight loss, and uncontrolled inflammatory bowel disease, have been associated with various degrees of hepatic steatosis. However, steatohepatitis and fibrosis are uncommon in these conditions.1

Total Parenteral Nutrition

Steatosis, steatohepatitis, and progressive fibrosis are recognized side effects of total parenteral nutrition (TPN)265 that more commonly manifest in older children and adults than in infants or young children, in whom features of cholestatic liver disease more often develop.266 Steatosis that typically is most prominent in zone 1 hepatocytes develops in adults on TPN. Zone 3 cholestasis and ductopenia also may be identified.

Celiac Disease

The association of celiac disease with the development of fatty liver disease is controversial. Some patients with celiac disease may have elevated aminotransferase levels and hepatic steatosis, but they are typically underweight, not overweight. However, in a few reported cases of NAFLD with steatohepatitis patients had concurrent celiac disease in which the liver disease responded positively to a gluten-free diet.267 Increased intestinal permeability and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth may be the underlying factor for the development of NAFLD in these cases.268

Viral Hepatitides

Viral hepatitides, particularly HCV and hepatitis D virus (HDV) infections, are often associated with significant hepatic steatosis. Many papers discuss the variables associated with steatosis in hepatitis C, including the status of the patient (e.g., BMI, metabolic syndrome), HCV-induced insulin resistance, properties of certain HCV genotypes (particularly GT 3 and GT 1),223,269 and coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).270 HCV has been strongly implicated in altered host lipid metabolism.271 Infection with HDV (i.e., Labrea hepatitis) is frequently associated with significant hepatic steatosis. HBV-related steatosis may be as common as in the general population and is related mainly to nonviral host factors.272

Miscellaneous Causes of Fatty Liver Disease

Macrovesicular steatosis may be found with inflammatory bowel disease,265 ischemia, heat stroke, liver regeneration, and aging. Tyrosinemia and galactosemia result in steatosis and fibrosis/cirrhosis in childhood. In all of these conditions, the steatotic changes are primarily located in zone 1 hepatocytes. Lipoprotein metabolism disorders such as abetalipoproteinemia, familial hypobetalipoproteinemia, Dorfman-Chanarin syndrome (i.e., abnormal lipid storage), and pseudoneonatal adrenoleukodystrophy are associated with the development of macrovesicular steatosis of the liver.21,273

References

 

1. Burt AD. Diagnosis and interpretation of steatosis and steatohepatitis. Semin Liver Dis. 1998;15:246–258.

2. Ludwig J, Viggiano TR, McGill DB, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: Mayo Clinic experiences with a hitherto unnamed disease. Mayo Clin Proc. 1980;55:434–438.

3. Matteoni CA, Younossi ZM, Gramlich T, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a spectrum of clinical and pathological severity. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:1413–1419.

4. Baffy G. Hepatocellular carcinoma in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: an emerging menace. J Hepatol. 2012;56:1384–1391.

5. Loria P. Should nonalcoholic fatty liver disease be renamed? Dig Dis. 2005;23:72–82.

6. Farrell GC. Drugs and steatohepatitis. Semin Liver Dis. 2002;22:185–194.

7. Brunt EM. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Semin Liver Dis. 2004;24:3–20.

8. Dixon JB. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: predictors of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis in the severely obese. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:91–100.

9. Dunn W, Sanyal AJ, Brunt EM, et al. Modest alcohol consumption is associated with decreased prevalence of steatohepatitis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). J Hepatol. 2012;57:384–391.

10. Adams LA. Non-invasive diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J Dig Dis. 2011;12:10–16.

11. Mandayam S. Epidemiology of alcoholic liver disease. Semin Liver Dis. 2004;24:217–232.

12. Mueller S. Alcoholic liver disease and hepatitis C, a frequently underestimated combination. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:3462–3471.

13. Wilfred de Alwis NM. Genetics of alcoholic liver disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Semin Liver Dis. 2007;27:44–54.

14. Day CP. Genes or environment to determine alcoholic liver disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int. 2006;26:1021–1028.

15. Day CP. Who gets alcoholic liver disease: nature or nurture? J R Coll Physicians Lond. 2000;34:557–562.

16. Stickel F. Genetic determinants of alcoholic liver disease. Gut. 2012;61:150–159.

17. Tsukamoto H. Current concepts in the pathogenesis of alcoholic liver injury. FASEB J. 2001;15:1335–1349.

18. Morgan TR. Alcoholic liver disease. Bacon BR, O’Grady JG, Di Bisceglie AM, Lake JR. Comprehensive Clinical Hepatology. 2nd ed. Elsevier: Philadelphia; 2006:311–326.

19. Stickel F, Buch S, Lau K, et al. Genetic variation in the PNPLA3 gene is associated with alcoholic liver injury in Caucasians. Hepatology. 2011;53:86–95.

20. Sookoian S. Meta-analysis of the influence of I148M variant of patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 3 gene (PNPLA3) on the susceptibility and histological severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2011;53:1883–1894.

21. Brunt EM, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Burt AD. Fatty liver disease: alcoholic and nonalcoholic. Burt AD, Portmann B, Ferrell L. MacSween’s Pathology of the Liver. 6th ed. Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh; 2012:293–359.

22. Lieber CS. Alcoholic fatty liver: its pathogenesis and mechanism of progression to inflammation and fibrosis. Alcohol. 2004;34:9–19.

23. French SW, Nash J, Shitabata P, et al. Pathology of alcoholic liver disease. Semin Liver Dis. 1993;13:154–159.

24. Lackner C, Gogg-Kammerer M, Zatloukal K, et al. Ballooned hepatocytes in steatohepatitis: the value of keratin immunohistochemistry for diagnosis. J Hepatol. 2008;48:821–828.

25. Dey A. Alcohol and oxidative liver injury. Hepatology. 2006;43(suppl 1):S63–S74.

26. Gao B. Alcoholic liver disease: pathogenesis and new therapeutic targets. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:1572–1585.

27. Siegmund SV. Molecular pathogenesis of alcohol-induced hepatic fibrosis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005;29:S102–S109.

28. Brunt EM. Alcoholic and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Clin Liver Dis. 2002;6:399–420.

29. Guy CD, Suzuki A, Burchette JL, et al. Costaining for keratins 8/18 plus ubiquitin improves detection of hepatocyte injury in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hum Pathol. 2012;43:790–800.

30. Yip WW. Alcoholic liver disease. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2006;23:149–160.

31. Zatloukal K, French SW, Denk H, et al. From Mallory to Mallory-Denk inclusion bodies: what, how and why? Exp Cell Res. 2007;313:2033–2049.

32. Stumptner C, Fuchsbichler A, Heid H, et al. Mallory body—a disease-associated type of sequestosome. Hepatology. 2002;35:1053–1062.

33. Colombat M, Charlotte F, Ratziu V, et al. Portal lymphocytic infiltrate in alcoholic liver disease. Hum Pathol. 2002;33:1170–1174.

34. Thiele GM. Immunologic mechanisms of alcoholic liver injury. Semin Liver Dis. 2004;24:273–287.

35. Uchida T, Kao H, Quispe-Sjogren M, et al. Alcoholic foamy degeneration—a pattern of acute alcoholic injury of the liver. Gastroenterology. 1983;84:683–692.

36. Itoh S. Comparison between nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and alcoholic hepatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1987;82:650–654.

37. Lefkowitch JH. Morphology of alcoholic liver disease. Clin Liver Dis. 2005;9:37–53.

38. Roskams TA. Progenitor cells in diseased human liver. Semin Liver Dis. 2003;23:385–396.

39. Roskams T, Yang SQ, Koteish A, et al. Oxidative stress and oval cell accumulation in mice and humans with alcoholic and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am J Pathol. 2003;163:1301–1311.

40. Goodman ZD. Occlusive venous lesions in alcoholic liver disease. A study of 200 cases. Gastroenterology. 1982;83:786–796.

41. Graziadei IW, Joseph JJ, Wiesner RH, et al. Increased risk of chronic liver failure in adults with heterozygous alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency. Hepatology. 1998;28:1058–1063.

42. Colli A, Massironi S, Faccioli P, et al. “Pseudotumoral” hepatic areas in acute alcoholic hepatitis: a computed tomography and histological study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:831–836.

43. Iqbal T, Diab A, Ward DG, et al. Is iron overload in alcohol-related cirrhosis mediated by hepcidin? World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:5864–5866.

44. Elphick DA, Dube AK, McFarlane E, et al. Spectrum of liver histology in presumed decompensated alcoholic liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:1–9.

45. Feldstein AE. Apoptosis in alcoholic and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Front Biosci. 2005;10:3093–3099.

46. Ziol M, Tepper M, Lohez M, et al. Clinical and biological relevance of hepatocyte apoptosis in alcoholic hepatitis. J Hepatol. 2001;34:254–260.

47. Mookerjee RP, Lackner C, Stauber R, et al. The role of liver biopsy in the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with acute deterioration of alcoholic cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2011;55:1103–1111.

48. Teli MR, Day CP, Burt AD, et al. Determinants of progression to cirrhosis or fibrosis in pure alcoholic fatty liver. Lancet. 1995;346:987–990.

49. Katoonizadeh A, Laleman W, Verslype C, et al. Early features of acute-on-chronic alcoholic liver failure: a prospective cohort study. Gut. 2010;59:1561–1569.

50. Kim WR, Brown RS, Terrault NA, et al. Burden of liver disease in the United States: summary of a workshop. Hepatology. 2002;36:227–242.

51. Deleuran T, Grønbæk H, Vilstrup H, et al. Cirrhosis and mortality risks of biopsy-verified alcoholic pure steatosis and steatohepatitis: a nationwide registry-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35:1336–1342.

52. Williams R. Global challenges in liver disease. Hepatology. 2006;44:521–526.

53. Morgan TR. Alcohol and hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:S87–S96.

54. Shih W-L, Chang H-C, Liaw Y-F, et al. Influences of tobacco and alcohol use on hepatocellular carcinoma survival. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:2612–2621.

55. Shaib YH, El-Serag HB, Davila JA, et al. Risk factors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a case-control study. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:620–626.

56. Mathurin P, Moreno C, Samuel D, et al. Early liver transplantation for severe alcoholic hepatitis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1790–1800.

57. Volk M. Liver transplantation for alcoholic hepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:1037–1038.

58. Mandavilli A. Asia’s big problem. Nat Med. 2004;10:325–327.

59. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association. Hepatology. 2012;142:1592–1609.

60. Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Clark JM, Bass NM, et al. Clinical, laboratory and histological associations in adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2010;52:913–924.

61. Fracanzani AL, Valenti L, Bugianesi E, et al. Risk of severe liver disease in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with normal aminotransferase levels: a role for insulin resistance and diabetes. Hepatology. 2008;48:792–798.

62. Mofrad P, Contos MJ, Haque M, et al. Clinical and histologic spectrum of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease associated with normal ALT values. Hepatology. 2003;37:1286–1292.

63. Sorrentino P, Tarantino G, Conca P, et al. Silent non-alcoholic fatty liver disease—a clinical-histological study. J Hepatol. 2004;41:751–757.

64. Loria P, Lonardo A, Leonardi F, et al. Non-organ-specific autoantibodies in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: prevalence and correlates. Dig Dis Sci. 2003;48:2173–2181.

65. Adams LA. The prevalence of autoantibodies and autoimmune hepatitis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1316–1320.

66. Vuppalanchi R, Gould RJ, Wilson LA, et al. Clinical significance of serum autoantibodies in patients with NAFLD: results from the nonalcoholic steatohepatitis clinical research network. Hepatol Int. 2012;6:387–395.

67. Shalhub S, Parsee A, Gallagher SF, et al. The importance of routine liver biopsy in diagnosing nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in bariatric patients. Obes Surg. 2004;14:54–59.

68. Dolce CJ, Russo M, Keller JE, et al. Does liver appearance predict histopathologic findings: prospective analysis of routine liver biopsiesss during bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:323–328.

69. Ratziu V, Bellentani S, Cortez-Pinto H, et al. A position statement on NAFLD/NASH based on the EASL 2009 special conference. J Hepatol. 2010;53:372–384.

70. Bugianesi E, Manzini P, D’Antico S, et al. Relative contribution of iron burden, HFE mutations, and insulin resistance to fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver. Hepatology. 2004;39:179–187.

71. Kowdley KV, Belt P, Wilson LA, et al. Serum ferritin is an independent predictor of histologic severity and advanced fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2012;55:77–85.

72. Hernaez R, Yeung E, Clark JM, et al. HFE and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepatol. 2011;55:1079–1085.

73. Bekri S, Gual P, Anty R, et al. Increased adipose tissue expression of hepcidin in severe obesity is independent from diabetes and NASH. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:788–796.

74. Targher G, Bertolini L, Rodella S, et al. NASH predicts plasma inflammatory biomarkers independently of visceral fat in men. Obesity. 2008;16:1394–1399.

75. Yilmaz Y. NAFLD in the absence of metabolic syndrome: different epidemiology, pathogenetic mechanisms, risk factors for disease progression? Semin Liver Dis. 2012;32:14–21.

76. Browning JD, Szczepaniak LS, Dobbins R, et al. Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: impact of ethnicity. Hepatology. 2004;40:1387–1395.

77. Saadeh S, Younossi ZM, Remer EM, et al. The utililty of radiological imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterolgy. 2002;123:745–750.

78. Neuschwander-Tetri BA. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: summary of an AASLD single topic conference. Hepatology. 2003;37:1202–1219.

79. Cheung O. Recent advances in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2010;26:202–208.

80. Marchesini G, Bugianesi E, Forlani G, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver, steatohepatitis, and the metabolic syndrome. Hepatology. 2003;37:917–923.

81. Schwimmer JB, Pardee PE, Lavine JE, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors and the metabolic syndrome in pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Circulation. 2008;118:277–283.

82. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285:2486–2497.

83. Fabbrini E, Magkos F, Mohammed BS, et al. Intrahepatic fat, not visceral fat, is linked with metabolic complications of obesity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:15430–15435.

84. Neuschwander-Tetri BA. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2006;13:119–126.

85. James O. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: another disease of affluence. Lancet. 1999;353:1634–1636.

86. Hossain P. Obesity and diabetes in the developing world—a growing challenge. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:213–215.

87. Weston SR, Leyden W, Murphy R, et al. Racial and ethnic distribution of nonalcoholic fatty liver in persons with newly diagnosed chronic liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;41:372–379.

88. Bambha K, Belt P, Abraham M, et al. Ethnicity and nonalcoholic liver disease. Hepatology. 2012;55:769–780.

89. Giday SA, Shiny Z, Naab T, et al. Frequency of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and degree of hepatic steatosis in African-American patients. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006;98:1613–1615.

90. Hayashi PH, Harrison SA, Torgerson S, et al. Cognitive lifetime drinking history in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: some cases may be alcohol related. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:76–81.

91. Armstrong MJ, Houlihan DD, Bentham L, et al. Presence and severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in a large prospective primary care cohort. J Hepatol. 2012;56:234–240.

92. Williams CD, Stengel J, Asike MI, et al. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis among a largely middle-aged population utilizing ultrasound and liver biopsy: a prospective study. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:124–131.

93. Duseja A, Sharma B, Kumar A, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver in a developing country is responsible for significant liver disease. Hepatology. 2010;52:2248–2249.

94. Das K, Mukherjee PS, Ghosh A, et al. Nonobese population in a developing country has a high prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver and significant liver disease. Hepatology. 2010;51:1593–1602.

95. Merriman RB, Ferrell LD, Patti MG, et al. Correlation of paired liver biopsies in morbidly obese patients with suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2006;44:874–880.

96. Caballero T, Gila A, Sanchez-Salgado G, et al. Histological and immunohistochemical assessment of liver biopsies in morbidly obese patients. Histol Histopathol. 2012;27:459–466.

97. Skelly MM. Findings on liver biopsy to investigate abnormal liver function tests in the absence of diagnostic serology. J Hepatol. 2001;35:195–199.

98. Struben VM. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and cryptogenic cirrhosis within kindreds. Am J Med. 2000;108:9–13.

99. Abdelmalek MF, Liu C, Shuster J, et al. Familial aggregation of insulin resistance in first-degree relatives of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:1162–1169.

100. Ong J, Elariny H, Collantes R, et al. Predictors of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and advanced fibrosis in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:310–315.

101. Angulo P, Keach JC, Batts KP, et al. Independent predictors of liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 1999;30:1356–1362.

102. Younossi ZM, Gramlich T, Matteoni CA, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:262–265.

103. Day CP. Genes or environment to determine alcoholic liver disease and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int. 2006;26:1021–1028.

104. Zein CO, Unalp A, Colvin R, et al. Smoking and severity of hepatic fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2011;54:753–759.

105. Day CP. The potential role of genes in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Liv Dis. 2004;8:673–691.

106. Younossi ZM, Baranova A, Ziegler K, et al. A genomic and proteomic study of the spectrum of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;42:665–674.

107. Romeo S, Kozlitina J, Xing C, et al. Genetic variation in PNPLA3 confers susceptibility to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Genet. 2008;40:1461–1465.

108. Sookoian S, Castano GO, Burgueno AL, et al. A nonsynonymous gene variant in the adiponutrin gene is associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease severity. J Lipid Res. 2009;50:2111–2116.

109. Rotman Y, Koh C, Zmuda JM, et al. The association of genetic variability in patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3 (PNPLA3) with histological severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2010;52:894–903.

110. Speliotes EK, Butler JL, Palmer CD, et al. PNPLA3 variants specifically confer increased risk for histologic nonalcoholic fatty liver disease but not metabolic disease. Hepatology. 2010;52:904–912.

111. Valenti L, Al-Serri A, Daly AK, et al. Homozygosity for the patatin-like phospholipase-3/adiponutrin I148M polymorphism influences liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2010;51:1209–1217.

112. Santoro N, Kursawe R, D’Adamo E, et al. A common variant in the patatin-like phospholipase 3 gene (PNPLA3) is associated with fatty liver disease in obese children and adolescents. Hepatology. 2010;52:1281–1290.

113. Valenti L, Alisi A, Galmozzi E, et al. I148M patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing 3 gene variant and severity of pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2010;52:1274–1280.

114. Farrell GC, van Rooyen D, Gan L, et al. NASH is an inflammatory disorder: pathogenic, prognostic and therapeutic implications. Gut Liver. 2012;6:149–171.

115. Harrison SA. New treatments for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2006;8:21–29.

116. Mager DR. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children. Clin Liver Dis. 2006;10:109–131.

117. Larter CZ. Insulin resistance, adiponectin, cytokines in NASH: which is the best target to treat? J Hepatol. 2006;44:253–261.

118. Day CP. From fat to inflammation. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:207–210.

119. Neuschwander-Tetri BA. Hepatic lipotoxicity and the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: the central role of nontriglyceride fatty acid metabolites. Hepatology. 2010;52:774–788.

120. Frazier TH, DiBaise JK, McClain CJ. Gut microbiota, intestinal permeability, obesity-induced inflammation, and liver injury. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2011;35(suppl):14S–20S.

121. Tilg H. Evolution of inflammation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: the multiple parallel hits hypothesis. Hepatology. 2010;52:1836–1846.

122. Tordjman J, Divoux A, Prifti E, et al. Structural and inflammatory heterogeneity in subcutaneous adipose tissue: relation with liver histopathology in morbid obesity. J Hepatol. 2012;56:1152–1158.

123. Maher JJ, Leon P, Ryan JC. Beyond insulin resistance: innate immunity in NASH. Hepatology. 2008;48:670–678.

124. Alisi A, Feldstein AE, Villani A. Pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a multidisciplinary approach. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;9:152–161.

125. Csak T, Ganz M, Pespisa J, et al. Fatty acid and endotoxin activate inflammasomes in mouse hepatocytes that release danger signals to stimulate immune cells. Hepatology. 2011;54:133–144.

126. Tilg H. Adipocytokines: mediators linking adipose tissue, inflammation and immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:772–783.

127. Nobili V, Carpino G, Alisi A, et al. Hepatic progenitor cells activation, fibrosis, and adipokines production in pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2012;56:2142–2153.

128. Lonardo A, Carani C, Carulli N, et al. “Endocrine NAFLD” a hormonocentric perspective of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease pathogenesis. J Hepatol. 2006;44:1196–1207.

129. Brunt EM. Histopathology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:5286–5296.

130. Brunt EM, Janney CG, Di Bisceglie AM, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Bacon BR. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a proposal for grading and staging the histological lesions. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:2467–2474.

131. Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;41:1313–1321.

132. Levene AP, Kudo H, Armstrong MJ, et al. Quantifying hepatic steatosis—more than meets the eye. Histopathology. 2012;60:971–981.

133. Boursier J, Chaigneau J, Roullier V, et al. Steatosis degree, measured by morphometry, is linked to other liver lesions and metabolic syndrome components in patients with NAFLD. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;23:974–981.

134. Franzen LE, Ekstedt M, Kechagias S, et al. Semiquantitative evaluation overestimates the degree of steatosis in liver biopsies: a comparison to sterological point counting. Mod Pathol. 2005;18:912–916.

135. Kleiner DE. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: pathologic patterns and biopsy evaluation in clinical research. Semin Liver Dis. 2012;32:3–13.

136. Tandra S, Yeh MM, Brunt EM, et al. Presence and significance of microvesicular steatosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2011;55:654–659.

137. Chalasani N, Wilson L, Kleiner DE, et al. Relationship of steatosis grade and zonal location to histological features of steatohepatitis in adult patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2008;48:829–834.

138. Caldwell SH. Subacute liver failure in obese women. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:2058–2062.

139. Rangwala F, Guy CD, Lu J, et al. Increased production of sonic hedgehog by ballooned hepatocytes. J Pathol. 2011;224:401–410.

140. De Vito R, Alisi A, Masotti A, et al. Markers of activated inflammatory cells correlate with severity of liver damage in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Int J Mol Med. 2012;30:49–56.

141. Tamimi TI, Elgouhari HM, Alkhouri N, et al. An apoptosis panel for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis diagnosis. J Hepatol. 2011;54:1224–1229.

142. Joka D, Wahl K, Moeller S, et al. Prospective biopsy-controlled evaluation of cell death biomarkers for prediction of liver fibrosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2012;55:455–464.

143. Wieckowska A, Zein NN, Yerian LM, et al. In vivo assessment of liver cell apoptosis as a novel biomarker of disease severity in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2006;44:27–33.

144. Harmon RC. Inflammation in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;5:189–200.

145. Lefkowitch JH. Kupffer cell aggregation and perivenular distribution in steatohepatitis. Mod Pathol. 2002;15:699–704.

146. Mattar SG, Velcu LM, Rabinovitz M, et al. Surgically-induced weight loss significantly improves nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the metabolic syndrome. Ann Surg. 2005;242:610–620.

147. Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Brunt EM, Wehmeier KR, et al. Improved nonoalcholic steatohepatitis after 48 weeks of treatment with the PPAR-gamma ligand rosiglitazone. Hepatology. 2003;38:1008–1017.

148. Brunt EM, Ramrakhiani S, Cordes BG, et al. Concurrence of histologic features of steatohepatitis with other forms of chronic liver disease. Mod Pathol. 2003;16:49–56.

149. Ramesh S. Hepatitis C and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Semin Liver Dis. 2004;24:399–413.

150. Brunt EM, Kleiner DE, Wilson LA, et al. Portal chronic inflammation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): a histologic marker of advanced NAFLD—clinicopathologic correlations from the nonalcoholic steatohepatitis clinical research network. Hepatology. 2009;49:809–820.

 

151. Rakha EA, Adamson L, Bell E, et al. Portal inflammation is associated with advanced histological changes in alcoholic and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Pathol. 2010;63:790–795.

152. Harrison SA, Brunt EM, Goodman ZD, et al. Diabetic hepatosclerosis: diabetic microangiopathy of the liver. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006;130:27–32.

153. Abdelmalek M. Two cases from the spectrum of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1995;20:127–130.

154. Caldwell SH, Oelsner DH, Iezzoni JC, et al. Cryptogenic cirrhosis: clinical characterization and risk factors for underlying disease. Hepatology. 1999;29:664–669.

155. Shimada M, Hashimoto E, Kaneda H, et al. Nonalcoholic steato­hepatitis: risk factors for liver fibrosis. Hepatol Res. 2002;24:429–438.

156. Richardson MM, Jonsson JR, Powell EE, et al. Progressive fibrosis in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis—altered regeneration and the ductular reaction. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:80–90.

157. Chiba M, Sasaki M, Kitamura S, et al. Participation of bile ductular cells in the pathological progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Pathol. 2011;64:564–570.

158. Roskams TA, Theise ND, Balabaud C, et al. Nomenclature of the finer branches of the biliary tree: canals, ductules and ductular reactions in human livers. Hepatology. 2004;39:1739–1745.

159. Gouw AS. Ductular reactions in human liver: diversity at the interface. Hepatology. 2011;54:1853–1863.

160. Sasaki M, Ikeda H, Yamaguchi J, et al. Bile ductular cells undergoing cellular senescence increase in chronic liver diseases along with fibrous progression. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;133:212–223.

161. Abrams GA, Kunde SS, Lazenby AJ, et al. Portal fibrosis and hepatic steatosis in morbidly obese subjects: a spectrum of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2004;40:475–483.

162. Le TH, Caldwell SH, Redick JA, et al. The zonal distribution of megamitochondria with crystalline inclusions in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2004;39:1423–1429.

163. Caldwell SH, de Freitas LA, Park SH, et al. Intramitochondrial crystalline inclusions in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2009;49:1888–1895.

164. Valenti L, Fracanzani AL, Bugianesi E, et al. HFE genotype, parenchymal iron accumulation, and liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:905–912.

165. Nelson JE, Wilson L, Brunt EM, et al. Relationship between the pattern of hepatic iron deposition and histological severity in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2011;53:448–457.

166. Corradini E. Iron and steatohepatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27:42–46.

167. Brunt EM. Pathological features of NASH. Front Biosci. 2005;10:1475–1484.

168. Nagore N. The pathology of diabetic hepatitis. J Pathol. 1988;156:155–160.

169. Aravinthan A, Verma S, Coleman N, et al. Vacuolation in hepatocyte nuclei is a marker of senescence. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65:557–560.

170. Latry P, Bioulac-Sage P, Echinard E, et al. Perisinusoidal fibrosis and basement membrane-like material in the livers of diabetic patients. Hum Pathol. 1987;18:775–780.

171. Torbenson MS, Chen YY, Brunt E, et al. Glygogenic hepatopathy: an underrecognized hepatic complication of diabetes mellitus. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30:508–513.

172. Gill RM, Belt P, Wilson L, et al. Centrizonal arteries and microvessels in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:1400–1404.

173. Satapathy SK. Novel treatment modalities for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2010;21:668–675.

174. Brunt EM. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: pathologic features and differential diagnosis. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2005;22:330–338.

175. Lutchman G, Modi A, Kleiner DE, et al. The effects of discontinuing pioglitazone in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2007;46:424–429.

176. Wanless IR. Fatty liver hepatitis (steatohepatitis) and obesity: an autopsy study with analysis of risk factors. Hepatology. 1990;12:1106–1110.

177. George DK, Goldwurm S, MacDonald GA, et al. Increased hepatic iron concentration in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is associated with increased fibrosis. Gastroenterology. 1998;114:311–318.

178. Ratziu V, Giral P, Charlotte F, et al. Liver fibrosis in overweight patients. Gastroenterology. 2000;118:1117–1123.

179. Argo CK, Northup PG, Al-Osaimi AMS, et al. Systematic review of risk factors for fibrosis progression in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Hepatol. 2009;51:371–379.

180. Wong VW-S, Wong GL-H, Choi PC-L, et al. Disease progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a prospective study with paired liver biopsies at 3 years. Gut. 2010;59:969–974.

181. Feldstein AE, Papouchado BG, Angulo P, et al. Hepatic stellate cells and fibrosis progression in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3:384–389.

182. Washington K, Wright K, Shyr Y, et al. Hepatic stellate cell activation in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and fatty liver. Hum Pathol. 2000;31:822–828.

183. Cortez-Pinto H, Baptista A, Camilo ME, et al. Hepatic stellate cell activation occurs in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;48:87–90.

184. Mato JM. Where are we in the search for noninvasive nonalcoholic steatohepatitis biomarkers? Hepatology. 2011;54:1115–1117.

185. Kang HS, Greenson JK, Omo JT, et al. Metabolic syndrome is associated with greater histologic severity, higher carbohydrate and lower fat diet in patients with NAFLD. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2247–2253.

186. Bugianesi E. Insulin resistance: a metabolic pathway to chronic liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;42:987–1000.

187. Hossain N, Afendy A, Stepanova M, et al. Independent predictors of fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:1224–1229.

188. Alkhouri N, Morris-Stiff G, Campbell C, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio: a new marker for predicting steatohepatitis and fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int. 2012;32:297–302.

189. Barr J, Caballería J, Martínez-Arranz I, et al. Obesity dependent metabolic signatures associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease progression. J Proteome Res. 2012;11:2521–2532.

190. Day CP. Natural history of NAFLD: remarkably benign in the absence of cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:375–378.

191. Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M, et al. Meta-analysis: natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for liver disease severity. Ann Med. 2011;43:617–649.

192. Rafiq N, Bai C, Fang Y, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:234–238.

193. Vernon G. Systematic review: the epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in adults. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34:274–285.

194. Adams LA, Lymp JF, St Sauver J, et al. The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a population-based cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:113–121.

195. Ekstedt M, Franzen LE, Mathiesen UL, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with NAFLD and elevated liver enzymes. Hepatology. 2006;44:865–873.

196. Angulo P. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1221–1231.

197. Sanyal AJ, Banas C, Sargeant C, et al. Similarities and differences in outcomes of cirrhosis due to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2006;43:682–689.

198. Soderberg C, Stal P, Askling J, et al. Decreased survival of subjects with elevated liver function tests during a 28-year follow-up. Hepatology. 2010;51:595–602.

199. Bhala N, Angulo P, van der Poorten D, et al. The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis: an international collaborative study. Hepatology. 2011;54:1208–1216.

200. Adams LA, Harmsen S, St Sauver JL, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease increases risk of death among patients with diabetes: a community-based cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1567–1573.

201. Molloy JW, Calcagno CJ, Williams CD, et al. Association of coffee and caffeine consumption with fatty liver disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and degree of hepatic fibrosis. Hepatology. 2012;55:429–436.

202. Birerdinc A, Stepanova M, Pawloski L, et al. Caffeine is protective in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35:76–82.

203. Targher G. Risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1341–1350.

204. Targher G, Bertolini L, Padovani R, et al. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and its association with cardiovascular disease among type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1212–1218.

205. Starley BQ. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma: a weighty connection. Hepatology. 2010;51:1820–1832.

206. Torres DM. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and noncirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma: fertile soil. Semin Liver Dis. 2012;32:30–38.

207. Charlton MR, Burns JM, Pedersen RA, et al. Frequency and outcomes of liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:1249–1253.

208. McCullough AJ. Pathophysiology of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40(suppl 1):S17–S29.

209. Sanyal A, Poklepovic A, Moyneur E, et al. Population-based risk factors and resource utilization for HCC. US perspective. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26:2183–2191.

210. Hui JM, Kench JG, Chitturi S, et al. Long-term outcomes of cirrhosis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis compared with hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2003;38:420–427.

211. Ascha MS, Hanouneh IA, Lopez R, et al. The incidence and risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2010;51:1972–1978.

212. Ertle J, Dechene A, Sowa JP, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease progresses to hepatocellular carcinoma in the absence of apparent cirrhosis. Int J Cancer. 2011;128:2436–2443.

213. Paradis V, Zalinski S, Chelbi E, et al. Hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with metabolic syndrome often develop without significant liver fibrosis: a pathological analysis. Hepatology. 2009;49:851–859.

214. Brunt EM, Wolverson MK, Di Bisceglie AM. Benign hepatocellular tumors (adenomatosis) in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a case report. Semin Liver Dis. 2005;25:230–236.

215. Watkins J, Balabaud C, Bioulac-Sage P, et al. Hepatocellular adenoma in advanced-stage fatty liver disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;21:931–936.

216. Mathurin P, Hollebecque A, Arnalsteen L, et al. Prospective study of the long-term effects of bariatric surgery on liver injury in patients without advanced disease. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:532–540.

217. Chatrath H. Dyslipidemia in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Semin Liver Dis. 2012;32:22–29.

218. Nguyen TA. Pathophysiology guided treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27(suppl 2):58–64.

219. Baker SS, Baker RD, Liu W, et al. Role of alcohol metabolism in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. PLoS One. 2010;5:1–11.

220. Ekstedt M, Franzen LE, Holmqvist M, et al. Alcohol consumption is associated with progression of hepatic fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:366–374.

221. Clouston AD. Interaction of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with other liver diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2002;16:767–781.

222. Powell EE. Steatosis: co-factor in other liver diseases. Hepatology. 2005;42:5–13.

223. Bedossa P, Moucari R, Chelbi E, et al. Evidence for a role of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in hepatitis C. A prospective study. Hepatology. 2007;46:380–387.

224. Loomba R, Sirlin CB, Schwimmer JB, et al. Advances in pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2009;50:1282–1293.

225. Fu JF, Shi HB, Liu LR, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: an early mediator predicting metabolic syndrome in obese children? World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:735–742.

226. Patton HM, Yates K, Unalp-Arida A, et al. Association between metabolic syndrome and liver histology among children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2093–2102.

227. Patton HM, Sirlin C, Behling C, et al. Pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a critical appraisal of current data and implications for future research. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006;43:413–427.

228. Ayonrinde OT, Olynyk JK, Beilin LJ, et al. Gender-specific differences in adipose distribution and adipocytokines influence adolescent nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2011;53:800–809.

229. Nobili V. Paediatric non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut. 2010;59:561–564.

230. Nobili V. Alcoholic and non-alcoholic fatty liver in adolescents: a worrisome convergence. Alcohol Alcohol. 2011;46:627–629.

231. Schwimmer JB, Deutsch R, Kahen T, et al. Prevalence of fatty liver in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2006;118:1388–1393.

232. Browning JD. Patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing 3 and the pathogenesis and progression of pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2010;52:1189–1192.

233. Feldstein AE, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Treeprasertsuk S, et al. The natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in children: a follow-up study for up to 20 years. Gut. 2009;58:1538–1544.

234. Schwimmer JB, Behling C, Newbury R, et al. Histopathology of pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;42:641–649.

235. Suzuki A, Abdelmalek MF, Schwimmer JB, et al. Association between puberty and features of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:786–794.

236. Nobili V, Marcellini M, Devito R, et al. NAFLD in children: a prospective clinical-pathological study and effect of lifestyle advice. Hepatology. 2006;44:458–465.

237. Takahashi Y, Inui A, Fujisawa T, et al. Histopathological characteristics of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in children: comparison with adult cases. Hepatol Res. 2011;41:1066–1074.

238. Carter-Kent C, Yerian LM, Brunt EM, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in children: a multicenter clinicopathological study. Hepatology. 2009;50:1113–1120.

239. Dunn W, Angulo P, Sanderson S, et al. Utility of a new model to diagnose an alcoholic basis for steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:1057–1063.

240. Sanderson S. The use of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B and insulin receptor immunostains to differentiate nonalcoholic from alcoholic steatohepatitis in liver biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;123:503–509.

241. Ludwig J. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997;12:398–403.

242. Brunt EM. Pathology of fatty liver disease. Mod Pathol. 2007;20(suppl 1):S40–S48.

243. Nakano M. Histological study on comparison between NASH and ALD. Hepatol Res. 2005;33:110–115.

244. Altamirano J, Miquel R, Katoonizadeh A, et al. A histologic scoring system for prognosis of patients with alcoholic hepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:1231–1239.

245. Hjelkrem M, Stauch C, Shaw J, et al. Validation of the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34:214–218.

246. Ekstedt M, Franzen LE, Mathiesen UL, et al. Low clinical relevance of the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) in predicting fibrosis progression. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:108–115.

247. Brunt EM, Kleiner DE, Wilson L, et al. The NAS and the histopathologic diagnosis of NASH: distinct clinicopathologic meanings. Hepatology. 2011;53:810–820.

247a. Bedossa P, Poitou C, Veyrie N, et al. Histopathological algorithm and scoring system for evaluation of liver lesions in morbidly obese patients. Hepatology. 2012;56:1751–1759.

247b. Bedossa P, Burt AD, Gouw AS, et al. Utility and appropriateness of the FLIP algorithm and SAF score in the evaluation of biopsies of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2014.

248. Ratziu V, Charlotte F, Heurtier A, et al. Sampling variability of liver biopsy in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:1898–1906.

249. Larson SP, Bowers SP, Palekar NA, et al. Histopathologic variability between the right and left lobes of the liver in morbidly obese patients undergoing Roux-en-Y bypass. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:1329–1332.

250. Guido M. Liver biopsy sampling in chronic viral hepatitis. Semin Liver Dis. 2004;24:89–97.

251. Vuppalanchi R, Unalp A, Van Natta ML, et al. Effects of liver biopsy sample length and number of readings on histologic yield for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:481–486.

252. Younossi ZM, Gramlich T, Liu YC, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease—assessment of variability in pathologic interpretations. Mod Pathol. 1998;11:560–565.

253. Fukusato T, Fukushima J, Shiga J, et al. Interobserver variation in the histopathological assessment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatol Res. 2005;33:122–127.

254. Brunt EM. Grading and staging the histopathological lesions of chronic hepatitis: the Knodell histology activity index and beyond. Hepatology. 2000;31:241–246.

255. Juluri R, Vuppalanchi R, Olson J, et al. Generalizability of the nonalcoholic steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network histologic scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45:55–58.

256. Rousselet MC, Michalak S, Dupre F, et al. Sources of variability in histological scoring of chronic viral hepatitis. Hepatology. 2005;41:257–264.

257. Hubscher SG, Clouston AD. Transplantation pathology. Burt AD, Portmann BG, Ferrell LD. MacSween’s Pathology of the Liver. 6th ed. Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh; 2012:853–933.

258. Malik SM, deVera ME, Fontes P, et al. Recurrent disease following liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis. Liver Transpl. 2009;15:1843–1851.

259. Yalamanchili K, Saadeh S, Klintmalm GB, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease after liver transplantation for cryptogenic cirrhosis or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Transpl. 2010;16:431–439.

260. Dureja P, Mellinger J, Agni R, et al. NAFLD recurrence in liver transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2011;91:684–689.

261. Burke A, Lucey MR. NAFLD, NASH and orthotopic liver transplantation. Farrell GC, George J, de la Hall PM, McCullough AJ. Fatty Liver Disease, NASH and Related Disorders. Blackwell Publishing: Malden, Mass; 2005:208–217.

262. Seo S, Maganti K, Khehra M, et al. De novo nonalcoholic fatty liver disease after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2007;13:844–847.

263. Koehler E. Fatty liver and liver transplantation. Clin LivDis. 2009;2009(13):621–630.

264. Contos MJ, Cales W, Sterling RK, et al. Development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease after orthotopic liver transplantation for cryptogenic cirrhosis. Liver Transpl. 2001;7:363–373.

265. Quaglia A, Burt AD, Ferrell LD, Portmann BC. Systemic disease. Burt AD, Portmann BC, Ferrell LD. MacSween’s Pathology of the Liver. 6th ed. Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh; 2012:935–986.

266. Naini BV. Total parenteral nutrition therapy and liver injury: a histopathologic study with clinical correlation. Hum Pathol. 2012;43:826–833.

267. Grant GM, Chandhoke V, Younossi ZM. Specific disorders associated with NAFLD. Farrell GC, George J, de la Hall PM, McCullough AJ. Fatty Liver Disease NASH and Related Disorders. Blackwell Publishing: Malden, Mass; 2005:249–262.

268. Compare D, Coccoli P, Rocco A, et al. Gut–liver axis: the impact of gut microbiota on non alcoholic fatty liver disease. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2012;22:471–476.

269. Brunt EM. Steatosis, steatohepatitis: review of effects on chronic hepatitis C. Curr Hepatitis Rep. 2002;1:38–44.

270. Guaraldi G, Lonardo A, Ballestri S, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus is the major determinant of steatosis and hepatitis C virus of insulin resistance in virus-associated fatty liver disease. Arch Med Res. 2011;42:690–697.

271. Clark PJ, Thompson AJ, Vock DM, et al. Hepatitis C virus selectively perturbs the distal cholesterol synthesis pathway in a genotype specific manner. Hepatology. 2012;56:49–56.

272. Machado MV. Hepatic steatosis in hepatitis B virus infected patients: meta-analysis of risk factors and comparison with hepatitis C infected patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26:1361–1367.

273. Walker UA, Schott M, Schebaum WA, et al. Acquired and inherited lipodystrophies. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:103–104.

274. Clark JM. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:1649–1657.

275. Clark JM. The prevalence and etiology of elevated aminotransferase levels in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:960–967.

276. Ruhl CE. Determinants of association of overweight with elevated serum alanine aminotrasferase activity in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:71–79.

277. Hilden M, Christoffersen P, Juhl E, Dalgaard JB. Liver histology in a “normal” population—examinations of 503 consecutive fatal traffic casualties. Scan J Gastroenterol. 2003;12 [593–579] .

278. Underwood Ground KE. Liver pathology in aircrew. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1982;53:14–18.

279. Hornboll P. Fatty changes in the liver. The relation to age, overweight, and diabetes mellitus. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand A. 1982;90:199–205.

280. Underwood Ground KE. Prevalence of fatty liver in healthy male adults accidentally killed. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1984;55:59–61.

281. Garcia-Monzon C, Martín-Pérez E, Iacono OL, et al. Characterization of pathogenic and prognostic factors of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis associated with obesity. J Hepatol. 2000;33:716–724.

282. Gramlich T, Kleiner DE, McCullough AJ, et al. Pathologic features associated with fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hum Pathol. 2004;35:196–199.

283. Fassio E, Alvarez E, Domínguez N, et al. Natural history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a longitudinal study of repeat liver biopsies. Hepatology. 2004;40:820–826.