Injuries to the Shoulder Girdle and Humerus

Published on 14/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Emergency Medicine

Last modified 14/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3459 times

87 Injuries to the Shoulder Girdle and Humerus

Presenting Signs and Symptoms

Sternoclavicular Joint Sprains and Dislocations

These injuries are graded as type I, a simple sprain of the joint; type II, subluxation of the joint, either anterior or posterior; and type III, complete dislocation of the joint. Dislocation usually results from a lateral force applied to the shoulder and an indirect force applied to either a rolled-back shoulder (anterior dislocation) or a rolled-in shoulder (posterior dislocation). Posterior dislocations are potentially life-threatening because the dislocated medial head of the clavicle may cause pneumothorax or injuries to the great vessels, esophagus, or trachea (all structures in the superior mediastinum).1

The patient complains of severe pain in the affected sternoclavicular joint. In anterior dislocations, the protruding medial end of the clavicle is visible, easily palpable, and tender. In posterior dislocations, there is often a cavity where the medial end of the clavicle would normally lie, which is especially noticeable when compared with the uninjured side. Patients with posterior dislocations may also have signs and symptoms of pneumothorax, vascular occlusion, and esophageal or tracheal injury.2 Routine radiographs may not be diagnostic, and computed tomography (CT) is usually required to make the diagnosis. This should always be performed with intravenous (IV) contrast media when a posterior sternoclavicular dislocation is suspected to rule out injuries to the superior mediastinal vascular structures3 (Fig. 87.3).

Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation or Separation

Acromioclavicular separations are generally caused by a fall onto the point of the shoulder or acromioclavicular joint with the arm adducted (thus the lay term shoulder pointer to describe this injury). It is caused less frequently by a fall onto the outstretched arm in extreme abduction, which drives the acromion below the clavicle. Acromioclavicular separations are classified as six types, although only the first three (I to III) are commonly seen. Types IV to VI are very uncommon and usually require surgical repair.1 In type I acromioclavicular separations, the acromioclavicular ligaments are partially torn and the coracoclavicular ligaments are intact, which results in less than 50% superior dislocation or separation of the clavicle from the acromion (Fig. 87.4, A to C). In type II injuries, the acromioclavicular ligaments are completely torn and the coracoclavicular ligaments are stretched or partially torn, which results in at least 50% superior dislocation or separation of the clavicle from the acromion. In type III injuries, both the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments are completely torn, with complete superior dislocation or separation of the clavicle from the acromion.

The patient complains of severe pain in the acromioclavicular joint. Type I dislocations are characterized by tenderness and some swelling over the acromioclavicular joint, with little or no tenderness over the distal end of the clavicle and coracoid process. With type II dislocations, patients have tenderness and more swelling over the acromioclavicular joint and some tenderness over the coracoid process. In type III dislocations, the clavicle is obviously dislocated superiorly when the patient is sitting or standing, with less deformity noted when the patient is supine. Shoulder radiographs may miss an acromioclavicular separation if the radiograph is taken with the patient supine. Acromioclavicular views (a single radiograph that includes both acromioclavicular joints) should be taken with patients in the sitting or standing position and the arms unsupported. In type I injuries there is less than 50% cephalad dislocation of the clavicle on the acromion of the affected shoulder. Type II injuries are marked by greater than 50% cephalad displacement of the clavicle on the acromion on the affected side. In type III dislocations, complete dislocation is seen on sitting or standing films. Use of weight-bearing films (the patient holds weights with the affected arm) is of no benefit.4

Glenohumeral Dislocations

Dislocations of the glenohumeral joint are divided into anterior, posterior, and inferior (luxatio erecta). Most glenohumeral dislocations are anterior and are caused by an indirect force such as abduction, extension, and external rotation; however, they are occasionally caused by a direct blow to the proximal end of the humerus.

Patients generally have severe pain in the glenohumeral joint and hold the affected arm in adduction and internal rotation. There is lack of the normal contour, with a depression where the humeral head would normally reside. Patients report extreme pain in the joint with any attempted movement of the arm. Anteroposterior (AP) and axillary or transthoracic lateral radiographic views should be obtained in all patients with suspected dislocations, even if the patient has a history of multiple dislocations, because occasionally an associated fracture of the proximal end of the humerus or a posterior dislocation will be present.6,7 If displaced fractures of the glenoid or proximal end of the humerus are suggested on plain radiographs, CT scans of the shoulder should be obtained. Although the AP film usually shows the “light bulb” appearance of the humeral head, it is not always present (Fig. 87.6). Though rare, with luxatio the patient has the classic picture of holding the arm in marked adduction and over the head (Fig. 87.7). The radiograph reveals the humeral head to lie inferior to the glenoid and the humeral shaft adducted superiorly (Fig. 87.8).

image

Fig. 87.7 Photograph of a patient with luxatio erecta.

(From Thomsen T, Setnick G, editors. Procedures consult—emergency medicine module.

image

Fig. 87.8 Radiograph of the shoulder of a patient with luxatio erecta.

(From Thomsen T, Setnick G, editors. Procedures consult—emergency medicine module.

Distal Humerus (Supracondylar) Fractures

Supracondylar fractures are classified as either flexion or extension fractures and occur almost exclusively in children, usually between the age of 4 and 10 years. More than 95% of these fractures are the extension type and occur when the child falls onto an outstretched arm with the elbow in full extension or hyperextension. In the flexion-type fracture, the child falls onto the arm with the elbow flexed.

The patient is generally seen holding the injured arm in extension with the unaffected hand. Swelling, as well as tenderness to palpation over the distal end of the humerus, is typical. An S-shaped deformity may be present if significant displacement of the fracture fragments has occurred. The patient resists any attempt to flex or extend the elbow. Elbow radiographs (AP and lateral views) should be obtained. The fracture will often be visible only on the lateral view unless fracture fragments are significantly displaced. Normally, the anterior humeral line should pass through the capitellum (Fig. 87.10, A and B). If the capitellum is anterior to the anterior humeral line, it is diagnostic of a flexion-type supracondylar fracture in a child. If the capitellum is posterior to the anterior humeral line, it is diagnostic of an extension-type supracondylar fracture. Based on radiographic findings, extension fractures are often classified into three types: type I has minimal or no displacement; type II is a displaced fracture with the posterior cortex intact; and type III is a completely displaced fracture, with both the anterior and posterior cortices disrupted.

image

Fig. 87.10 A, Normal anterior humeral line alignment. B, Supracondylar fractures.

(From Simon R, Koenigsknecht S. Emergency orthopaedics: the extremities. 2nd ed. Norwalk, Conn.: Appleton & Lange; 1987.)