Chapter 122 Infectious Endophthalmitis
Organisms that cause endophthalmitis
Bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and parasites are all capable of producing endophthalmitis (Box 122.1).
Bacteria
Gram-positive cocci
Staphylococci
S. epidermidis has been increasingly identified as a cause of human infection often associated with foreign bodies, such as implanted catheters, and has become the most common cause of postoperative endophthalmitis.1–7 Hospitals may not subspeciate coagulase-negative staphylococci, reporting them all as S. epidermidis.
Gram-positive bacilli
Bacillus
The genus Bacillus has more than 13 members, the most widely known of which is B. anthrax. The most common intraocular pathogen is B. cereus, with B. subtilis also identified as a cause of endophthalmitis.9 Bacillus is an aerobic spore-forming rod that is Gram-positive or Gram-variable in stain. The size varies from 3 × 0.4 µm to 9 × 2 µm. These organisms grow singly, in chains, or in diplobacillary form. In nature they are usually found in decaying organic matter, dust, soil, vegetables, water, and human flora. B. cereus is an important cause of food poisoning and may cause bacteremia as a result of wound or burn infections. It produces multiple extracellular products, including antimicrobial substances, enzymes, and toxins. The enterotoxins are diarrheal and emetic in action, and there are two additional toxins that may be correlated with virulence. Some toxins have produced severe inflammation when injected into the eye.10 Identification by the laboratory is usually as a cultural contaminant.
Risk factors for Bacillus infection include intravenous (IV) drug use, sickle-cell disease, foreign bodies including IV catheters, immunosuppression from malignancy, neutropenia, corticosteroid use, and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Bacillus is now the most commonly identified organism in traumatic endophthalmitis.11–14 The infection is particularly virulent and may destroy the eye in 12–24 hours. It is unique in inducing fever and leukocytosis in endophthalmitis.
Propionibacterium
Propionibacterium organisms are Gram-positive or Gram-variable rods that are often pleomorphic, anaerobic, and nonsporulating. Propionibacteria are a predominant component of skin flora and are also found on mucosal surfaces of the mouth, intestines, urethra, and vagina. They are the most common clinical isolate of Gram-positive, nonsporulating bacteria. They are found in acne, prosthetic joints, cerebrospinal fluid shunts, endocarditis, and osteomyelitis. They have been identified as a cause of postoperative endophthalmitis of a chronic granulomatous nature, almost exclusively found in patients with intraocular lenses (IOLs).15–20 P. acnes is almost always the clinical isolate.
Gram-negative bacilli
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas produces a wide variety of clinical syndromes, including endocarditis on prosthetic valves and in IV drug users, lower respiratory infections in persons with compromised defense mechanisms, bacteremia in immunocompromised patients, meningitis and brain abscesses, corneal ulcers, keratitis, ophthalmia neonatorum, scleral abscess, and conjunctivitis. Pseudomonas is the most common cause of Gram-negative endophthalmitis. Most cases of endophthalmitis are produced by P. aeruginosa, but other species have also been isolated in clinical cases.11,21 Sensitivities include aminoglycosides and ceftazidime.21,22
Enterobacteriaceae
Klebsiella
The genus Klebsiella contains a group of three species of bacteria, including K. pneumoniae. They are a relatively common isolate in Gram-negative endophthalmitis23 and are characteristically resistant to multiple antibiotics. Enterobacter organisms are opportunistic pathogens that rarely produce human disease. When they function as opportunistic pathogens, however, they may be resistant to first-generation cephalosporins. Serratia spp. are opportunistic pathogens that have only been recognized as capable of producing human disease since the 1960s. They are more likely to colonize the respiratory and urinary tracts of hospitalized patients than other Enterobacteriaceae. Most hospital infections are caused by catheterization and instrumentation of the urinary and respiratory tracts. These organisms have multiple drug resistances but are most often sensitive to amikacin.
Fungi
Candida
Candida is predominantly a unicellular organism that is small, thin-walled, ovoid, and reproduces by budding. Yeast forms, hyphae, and pseudohyphae may all be identified in clinical specimens; their identification is facilitated by staining with KCl 10%. On culture, it grows as a smooth, creamy-white colony that usually must be identified by physiologic rather than morphologic means. Candida is widespread in soil, hospital environments, inanimate objects, food, and as a commensal of humans, being isolated from diseased skin, the gastrointestinal tract, female genitalia, and the urine of patients with Foley catheters. The incidence of Candida infections has increased with the use of immunosuppression, indwelling catheters, and with increased IV drug use.24,25 Candida typically causes endophthalmitis as a complication of candidemia26 or as a result of epidemics of contaminated irrigating solutions used in intraocular surgery.27 It typically responds to amphotericin, triazoles,28 and 5-fluorocytosine.
Histoplasma capsulatum
Histoplasmosis is the most common human fungus infection in the USA. Virtually all persons in the Ohio river valley and along the lower Mississippi river have been infected. Two eye syndromes are produced by H. capsulatum. The presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome consists of a morphologic triad of fundus scarring consisting of peripheral punched-out spots, macular disciform scars, and peripapillary scarring. This is thought to be a late effect of H. capsulatum after hematogenous spread has created earlier choroidal infections. Organisms have not been identified in this form of the disease. Endophthalmitis associated with disseminated histoplasmosis has been described in an immunocompromised host.29 Amphotericin is the drug of choice in active disease but is not indicated in presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome.
Helminths, protozoa, and ectoparasites
Helminths
Taenia solium, a trematode, is the pork tapeworm for which humans are the only definitive host. Ingestion of the organism allows the development of the intermediate-stage Cysticercus cellulosae. This organism may invade almost any area of the body, including the vitreous cavity. Other helminths of ocular importance are Toxocara canis and T. cati. The predominant hosts for these organisms are dogs and cats, respectively. There are a large number of viable eggs, particularly from T. canis, in the environment. Eggs are spread by direct ingestion or, in the case of dogs, by eating infected meat. T. canis in children produces a chronic inflammatory granulomatous disease involving the vitreous and retina.30
Protozoa
Toxoplasmosis is the most common protozoon causing eye disease.31 Toxoplasma gondii is an obligate intracellular protozoon that is ubiquitous in nature, infecting all herbivorous, carnivorous, and omnivorous animals. The definitive host is the cat. The ingestion of raw or uncooked meat allows tissue cysts to enter the gastrointestinal tract where they are broken down. They then invade the walls of the gastrointestinal tract and spread throughout the body to many tissues. The organisms remain viable for the life of the host. Although most humans are asymptomatic for the infection, a recurrent panuveitis may be an ocular manifestation of infestation.
Experimental endophthalmitis
Meyers-Elliott and Dethlefs32 injected Klebsiella oxytoca organisms into the vitreous cavity of the phakic rabbit. Pathologic evaluation demonstrated widespread polymorphonuclear leukocyte invasion throughout ocular tissues within 24 hours and significant photoreceptor degeneration within 48 hours. Peak numbers of organisms could be cultured from the eye at 24 hours, but they declined spontaneously, with no organisms being recovered after 72 hours. Pathologic signs continued to increase once the cavity was sterile, however, implicating endotoxins as important to ongoing tissue damage. Davey and colleagues33 injected K. pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa into the vitreous of the phakic rabbit and noted that bacterial growth peaked at 48 hours, with the number of organisms falling spontaneously after this. Measurable changes in biochemical parameters of the vitreous did not seem to account for this phenomenon; the authors postulated that it might be a characteristic of Gram-negative infections. Meredith and coworkers34 created an experimental model of Staphylococcus epidermidis endophthalmitis by injecting various numbers of organisms into the vitreous cavity of the aphakic rabbit. Low numbers of organisms produced mild disease with slow progression; some infections appeared to be self-limited. Larger numbers of organisms produced infections of greater intensity, which were almost uniformly steadily progressive. Organisms could not be recovered from the vitreous cavity after 96 hours, however, regardless of the size of the initial inoculum. This fact suggests that progressive inflammatory signs were related to factors other than continuing active infection. Other models of S. epidermidis have yielded organisms from the phakic eye as long as 7 days after their injection into the vitreous. Peyman35 produced endophthalmitis with S. aureus in phakic rabbits to compare various treatment regimens, reporting uniformly poor results with loss of the eye in untreated animals.
Beyer et al.36 studied the role of the posterior capsule in the development of S. aureus endophthalmitis in the primate. Nine monkeys had bilateral lens extraction; in one eye a large capsulotomy was performed, while in the other the capsule was intact. Inoculation of 105 S. epidermidis organisms was made into the anterior chamber, and the vitreous was cultured after 72 hours. Only one culture was positive with the capsule intact, but all nine cultures were positive when the capsule was opened. The experiment was repeated with a posterior-chamber lens implanted. None of ten eyes with an intact capsule and IOL was culture-positive, whereas 40% of the eyes with the capsule open and a lens in place were culture-positive and an additional 20% showed histopathologic signs of vitreous inflammation. An intact posterior capsule thus appeared to inhibit the spread of infection from the anterior chamber into the vitreous cavity, an effect that was not compromised by the addition of a posterior-chamber IOL.
Anaerobic organisms have also been used to produce clinical disease in the rabbit. The injection of 1000 organisms of Fusobacterium necrophorum into the vitreous cavity of the phakic rabbit produced clinical infection in 100% of eyes. Propionibacterium acnes was studied in the aphakic rabbit with and without a posterior-chamber IOL.37 Injection of 108 organisms into the anterior chamber produced a severe infection, while inoculation of 2.5 × 106 produced clinical inflammation that peaked at 3 days but persisted for up to 24 days. The presence of an IOL appeared to favor the development of chronic, low-grade inflammation.
Clinical findings
Postoperative infection
Postoperative infection is the cause of roughly two-thirds of all cases of endophthalmitis in most clinical series. Although infectious endophthalmitis may follow any operative procedure performed on the eye, most cases follow cataract extraction, and almost all are bacterial in origin. Studies from a single institution suggest that the incidence of endophthalmitis over the past several decades has been declining. At the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, the incidence from 1984 to 1994 was 0.09%, dropping to 0.05% from 1995 to 2001.38 Recent studies indicate that causative organisms in infection after cataract surgery are usually genetically identical to the patient’s own flora.39,40 In 75–95% of the reported cases, the causative organisms are Gram-positive. A significant percentage of cases of apparent infectious endophthalmitis proved to be culture-negative.2,3,41
Cataract extraction
Allen42 reviewed 30 000 intracapsular cataract procedures performed at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary from 1964 to 1977, and found an incidence of endophthalmitis of 0.057%. A review of 23 625 cases of extracapsular cataract extraction from Bascom Palmer Eye Institute revealed an incidence of 0.072%.5 More recent figures from two studies in the phacoemulsification era suggest an incidence of 0.03%43 to 0.04%38,44 National registries in Sweden45 and Norway46 identified rates of 0.1% and 0.11–0.16%, respectively.
Heavy cellular debris is present in the vitreous, and there may be focal accumulations of whitish material or sheets of opacification within the vitreous. The intraocular pressure may be low, normal, or high. The pupil often dilates poorly, making examination with an indirect ophthalmoscope difficult. Retinal periphlebitis47 has been reported as an early sign, but in most cases the retinal vessels are seen poorly, if at all. With more severe disease, large areas of opacity are seen within the vitreous; there may be a red reflex, or only a dark appearance to the posterior cavity.
Infection caused by Staphylococcus epidermidis and other species of coagulase-negative staphylococci may have the clinical onset delayed by 5 days or more after surgery. Even then, the clinical signs and symptoms may be mild and may be difficult to distinguish from a noninfectious inflammatory process.1,4,48,49 There was no hypopyon or pain in 25% of confirmed cases in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study (EVS).50 In this study a number of clinical features at initial presentation were associated with microbiologic factors. More severe initial findings suggest infection with Gram-negative bacteria, Streptococcus or Staphylococcus aureus. Factors noted at initial diagnosis correlating with Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms other than Gram-positive coagulase micrococci included corneal infiltrate, cataract wound abnormalities, afferent pupillary defect, loss of red reflex, initial light perception-only vision, and symptom onset within 2 days of surgery. Gram-negative organisms were not identified in those eyes in which retinal vessels were visualized preoperatively; 61.9% of those eyes had equivocal or no growth. Diabetes mellitus was associated with a higher yield of Gram-positive, coagulase-negative micrococci, while there was a shift toward other Gram-positive organisms in eyes undergoing secondary IOL implantation compared with those that had initial cataract surgery.51,52
Late-onset disease may occur with predisposing anatomic problems such as a persistent conjunctival filtering bleb or the presence of a vitreous wick.53 Chronic, low-grade inflammation that ultimately proves to be of an infectious origin may occur in rare instances and has been termed chronic postoperative endophthalmitis or delayed-onset endophthalmitis.16,54 This may occur secondary to coagulase-negative Gram-positive organisms (such as S. epidermidis)16,54 and also results from infections with the anaerobic species Propionibacterium acnes.15–20 In reviews of cases of endophthalmitis after cataract extraction, a significant incidence of intraoperative complications has been found.16–18,55–57 Postoperative filtering blebs, wound leaks,55 and vitreous wick are also found more frequently in infected eyes.2 Infection can also result after the cutting of sutures holding the cataract wound or after an invasive procedure to incise the posterior capsule.2,58
The type of cataract incision has recently attracted attention as a possible contributor to the incidence of postoperative infection. A case–control study demonstrated a threefold greater risk of endophthalmitis with clear corneal incisions than with scleral tunnel incision.59 However, this has not been confirmed by newer studies.60,61 Temporal incisions were noted to have a higher incidence of infection than superior incisions in another study.62 A case–control study of secondary IOL implantation showed endophthalmitis to be associated with diabetes mellitus, transscleral suture fixation of posterior-chamber IOLs, polypropylene haptics, preoperative eyelid abnormalities, re-entry of the eye through a previous wound, and postoperative wound defects.63
Gram-positive organisms are found in 75–90% of culture-positive cases.3,51 Most common is S. epidermidis, followed by S. aureus and Streptococcus spp. Gram-negative organisms accounted for only 6% of the culture-positive cases in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study.3,51 Fungi are rare, with the exception of epidemics such as those of Candida parapsilosis64 and Paecilomyces lilacinus,65 which were traced to infected irrigating solutions. Bacterial epidemics have also been traced to an infected phacoemulsifier (Pseudomonas),66 and to infected viscoelastic material (Bacillus spp.).67 Culture-negative cases account for 25–35% of cases of pseudophakic endophthalmitis.2,3,51,68
Corneal transplantation
Since endophthalmitis after corneal transplantation is rarely seen, its characteristics are less well defined. In two large series of corneal transplants, an incidence of 0.11% and 0.08% of postoperative endophthalmitis was reported.38,69 In a review of over 90 000 cases between 1972 and 2002, the incidence after PKP was 0.38%.70 Guss et al.69 studied 445 corneal transplant cases and demonstrated that, in addition to three acute cases, there were eight other cases, six of which occurred after an ulcerative process in the graft. Endophthalmitis of delayed or late onset can also result from suture abscess formation or from bacterial access to the anterior chamber associated with a loose suture.71 In an ulcerative process, entry may occur because of disruption of continuity of the graft, or the bacteria may invade through an intact but thinned cornea. Endophthalmitis following corneal transplantation has also been associated with a vitreous wick. Unlike endophthalmitis following cataract surgery, the onset of the disease may be relatively painfree and is heralded by an increased anterior-chamber reaction, hypopyon, and loss of red reflex. The bacteria usually involved in these cases are Gram-positive, with Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. being equally represented; fungal and Gram-negative cases are least common. In the series of Leveille et al.,72 three of four acute cases were associated with a contaminated donor rim; this was not noted in any of the cases reported by Guss et al.69 The prognosis in post-corneal transplantation cases is poor; nine of the 11 cases reported by Guss et al.69 had final vision of light perception or no light perception.
Glaucoma filtration surgery
The risk of developing endophthalmitis after filtering surgery is similar to the risk following cataract extraction,5,38,73–76 but most of these cases occur months to years after the original procedure. A prodrome of browache, headache, or eye pain is not uncommon.77 There may be an antecedent conjunctivitis, but often the abrupt onset of pain and redness constitutes the presenting signs and symptoms. An inferior location to the bleb and use of antifibrotic agents increase the likelihood of subsequent infection.78–80 The blebs may appear intact in these cases, although some may be Seidel-positive.53,80 Thin, avascular, and leaking blebs appear to be at increased risk of infection.77 The material within the bleb is white or yellow, giving a “white-on-red” appearance against the conjunctival erythema. Eyes with glaucoma drainage devices are also at risk for infection.75 The spectrum of bacteria isolated from culture-positive bleb infection is quite different from that of endophthalmitis following cataract surgery, with 31–57% demonstrating Streptococcus spp. as the causative organism53,77,79,81–83 More recent series have found more cases caused by Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. than older reports. Gram-negative species are also more common than after acute post-cataract infections.83 Visual outcomes remain generally poor in these cases, even with modern therapy. In two large series, 50% of eyes had final visual acuity of 20/400 or better,82,83 in part because of the influence of Streptococcus spp. infections on the outcome.
Pars plana vitrectomy
The incidence of endophthalmitis after pars plana vitrectomy appears to be about the same as that after other intraocular procedures.38,84 The diagnosis is most difficult to make because the normal postoperative pain and intraocular inflammation after vitrectomy may mask the symptoms. The diagnosis rests on findings that are more severe than usual; appearance of hypopyon is often rapid and should cause particular concern.84,85 In one case with intraocular silicone, findings were limited to a whitish material collecting between the silicone and the retina.86 The spectrum of bacteria in these cases is similar to other acute postoperative infections. In spite of this, the prognosis is uniformly poor, and retention of vision is rare.
The first large, multicenter studies in the era of small gauge vitrectomy suggested a significant higher rate of endophthalmitis with 25-gauge sutureless vitrectomy (0.23 and 0.84)87,88 Since then, several large series have not confirmed these findings.89–92 Optimized wound construction, modifications in case selection and a lower threshold for suturing appear to reduce the incidence of endophthalmitis in small gauge cases to the level of standard 20-gauge cases.
Intraocular injection
Introduction of organisms into the eye may occur during a pars plana injection of intraocular gas for pneumatic retinopexy.93 In recent years intraocular injection of medications to treat age-related macular degeneration, macular edema, retinal vein occlusions, cytomegalovirus retinitis and uveitis have increased in frequency dramatically, resulting in increased numbers of cases of endophthalmitis. The reported incidence of endophthalmitis following intravitreal injections varies significantly. A recent review paper described a rate of endophthalmitis from 0.014% up to 0.87% per injection. The overall incidence was 0.051% (50/98 962).94 Injection technique used varied from study to study. To this day there is no clear consensus on a “standard” injection protocol as for the use of a sterile drape, gloves, surgical mask or topical antibiotics. So far, only the use of povidone iodine and a lid speculum is routinely recommended.95 Cultures most frequently showed coagulase-negative staphylococci as causative organism, with atypical organisms being more common after the use of triamcinolone.94 With triamcinolone, the typical clinical signs of endophthalmitis may be masked by antiinflammatory effects and the presentation may be difficult to differentiate from a pseudohypopyon without infection which can occur after triamcinolone injection caused by deposition of the injected material in the anterior chamber.96