Immunophenotyping

Published on 04/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine

Last modified 04/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2630 times

Chapter 16 Immunophenotyping

Introduction

Since the development of the hybridoma technology in the 1970s, there have been major advances in the immunophenotypic characterization of haemopoietic malignancies and this, in turn, has resulted in a better understanding of normal haemopoietic differentiation. Prior to the availability of monoclonal antibodies (McAbs), it was possible to distinguish B and T lymphocytes from each other and both from early lymphoid precursor cells by the expression of surface or cytoplasmic (c) immunoglobulin in B lymphocytes; the ability to form rosettes with sheep erythrocytes (E-rosettes) in T lymphocytes; and the expression of the nuclear enzyme, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT), in lymphoid precursors. Over the last two decades, the application of new technology has had a major impact on the diagnosis of acute and chronic leukaemias and has provided clues to the pathogenesis and prognosis of these disorders. Comparing patterns of expression between normal and neoplastic cells allows accurate detection of very small numbers of residual leukaemic cells. Beyond its diagnostic value, some chimeric McAbs, such as those recognizing the CD20, CD22, CD23, CD25, CD33 and CD52 antigens (CD = cluster of differentiation), are used in vivo as therapeutic agents; therefore, their estimation in the leukaemic cells has become an important clinical issue.

In addition to the increasing availability of a large number of McAbs that identify antigens in haemopoietic cells that are lineage-specific or restricted to particular levels of haemopoietic differentiation, a number of immunological techniques have been developed that allow the following:

Although the diagnostic role of immunophenotyping is well-recognized, results should always be interpreted in the light of morphology and other relevant clinical and laboratory data.

This chapter includes descriptions of the following:

Methods for the study of immunological markers

There are several techniques for identifying antigens expressed by leucocytes:

The first two methods are used in haematology laboratories dealing with analysis of leukaemic samples, and the last is used, as a rule, in histopathology laboratories.

Preparation of the Specimens and Cell Separation

Nowadays, immunophenotyping is routinely performed on whole blood or bone marrow specimens incorporating a red cell lysis step, but isolated mononuclear cells can also be used.

The mononuclear cell fraction contains lymphocytes, monocytes and blasts and excludes neutrophils and erythrocytes. Methods for separating mononuclear cells include density gradient centrifugation with Ficoll-Triosil, Hypaque or Lymphoprep.

Ficoll-Gradient Method of Separation

Dilute 10 ml of anticoagulated (e.g. heparinized or ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid, EDTA-anticoagulated) blood with an equal volume of phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.3 (see p. 622) or Hanks’ solution. Add 10 ml of the diluted blood, drop by drop, to 7.5 ml of Lymphoprep (Nycomed) and then centrifuge for 30 min at 2000 rpm (approx. 500 g). This results in three visible layers: a top layer of plasma; an interphase layer of mononuclear cells; and a layer of red cells and neutrophils at the bottom. After removing the plasma, pipette the mononuclear cell layer into another tube and wash three times with Hanks’ solution or tissue culture medium.

Multicolour Flow Cytometry Methods

There have been considerable improvements in flow cytometry instrumentation in recent years with the introduction of more lasers, more powerful computers and novel software for data acquisition and analysis

At the same time, the introduction of a large number of novel fluorochromes and the application of new McAbs has led to multiparametric immunophenotyping of cells, facilitating the accurate identification of normal and abnormal cell populations. Such advances have led to an increase in the complexity of data obtained and a subsequent increase in the comprehensiveness of the knowledge obtained by the flow cytometrist interpreting such data.1

Detection of membrane antigens

Multicolour flow cytometry:

1. Stain–Lyse–Wash (Fig. 16.1): Label tubes with the name of the patient, type of specimen, laboratory number and the combination of fluorochrome-conjugated McAb to be used including isotypic controls; isotypic controls are mouse immunoglobulin (Ig) of the same isotope as the McAbs but with no antigen specificity.

Finally, resuspend the cell pellet in 10 ml of PBS-azide-BSA and perform a white cell count. Aliquot a volume of cell suspension containing 1–2 × 106/tube. If the number of cells in the specimen is not enough for the ideal amount of cells per tube, aliquot the specimen equally between all the tubes. Add appropriate volume of McAb, incubate in the dark, repeat washing procedure and resuspend in 0.2–0.5 ml of sheath fluid. Acquire data on the flow cytometer.

Detection of Surface Immunoglobulin

Lymphoproliferative disorders of mature B cells are distinguished from their normal counterparts by the identifications of two main types of phenotypic abnormalities: surface immunoglobulin light chain restriction and aberrant B-cell antigen expression (Fig. 16.2).

The method of detection of surface heavy and light chain immunoglobulins by flow cytometry differs from the one used to detect other surface antigens. This is because the interpretation of staining for kappa/lambda and heavy chains can be made more difficult by the presence of nonspecific staining giving rise to either false positivity or negativity which can be misleading. This non-specific staining may be due to cytophilic antibodies binding to Fc receptors (monocytes and some lymphocytes) or to coating of antibodies to cell membranes of damaged or dying cells.

To overcome this problem, there are several options: the specimen can be washed with an isotonic solution prior to staining for the surface immunoglobulins. Non-specific staining can also be minimized by incubating the cells with serum prior to staining.

This phenomenon can be excluded by gating on B cells during data analysis, for instance assessing the surface immunoglobulins on a CD19+/CD45+ gate.

Finally, some B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders such as chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) may express surface immunoglobulin very weakly. It is preferable to use polyclonal antibodies to detect light chain restriction in these cases

There are two methods suitable for detecting surface Ig in blood and bone marrow cells, according to whether a PBS wash or a lysing procedure is used as the first step.

Detection of Intracellular Antigens

This method is applied to the identification of antigens that are expressed within the cell, i.e. in the cytoplasm or nucleus. For example, intracellular immunoglobulins, MPO, lysozyme, CD3, CD79a, BCL2, TdT and Ki67 can all be detected by this method.

There are several commercially available kits containing solutions to fix and permeabilize cells to detect cytoplasmic or nuclear antigens. Overall, these reagents have little or no effect on the light scatter pattern, although their reliability and consistency for detecting particular nuclear and cytoplasmic antigens may vary.2,3

The kits contain two solutions: solution A is the fixing agent based on a paraformaldehyde solution and solution B is a lysing agent based on a combination of a lysing solution and a detergent.

The methods follow the manufacturer’s kit instructions. Details that follow are for the method using Fix and Perm (Invitrogen).4

Data Analysis Strategies with Multiparametric Flow Cytometry

Multiparametric data including staining with several fluorochromes and the scatter properties of cells is currently used to accurately identify different cell populations and distinct disease entities.

Flow cytometry immunophenotyping provides not only a screening for haemato-oncological disorders but also is an indispensable diagnostic tool. It can identify cells from different lineages, it can determine their stage of maturation, it can discriminate normal cells from abnormal by the assessment of antigen expression or the lack of it and it can quantify the tumour infiltration. It can estimate the presence of minimal residual disease by comparing patterns of expression with that seen in normal counterparts.

Traditionally flow cytometry data was analysed in bivariate plots of two- or three-colour analyses with the application of electronic gates based on the scatter characteristic of cells.

As computers became more powerful, other strategies have been developed employing ‘immunological’ and sequential gating associated with forward and side scatter properties. For instance, in cases of acute leukaemia the preferred routine practice is to gate blast populations based on the side scatter properties and CD45 expression rather than gating solely on forward and side scatter plots.

Similarly in cases of B-cell disorders, it is more informative to gate on CD19-positive cells and side scatter and for T-cell disorders to apply a gate on CD3-positive cells and side scatter. Multicolour flow cytometry gating of plasma cells is performed to differentiate between clonal and normal plasma cells by combining sequential gating on the CD45-negative/CD138-positive cells and then to look specifically at other antigen expression on these cells.

Finally, a very important use of multicolour flow cytometry analysis strategies is in the detection of minimal residual disease of acute and chronic leukaemias. The sensitivity of these methods may be as good as 0.04% acquiring 50 000 events or 50 to 100 events of interest and increases as more events are acquired.

Until recently, advances made in computing capabilities, and the increased availability in fluorochrome conjugates, had not been matched by the developments in analysis software. However, new independent targeted analysis programmes to deal with these limitations have now been developed, which include novel tactics for the analysis of multiparametric flow cytometry data such as the software developed by the Euroflow consortium.5