Immunology and Infectious Disorders

Published on 22/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Critical Care Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1392 times

16 Immunology and Infectious Disorders

Anatomy and physiology: immunology

Immunology Overview

The human immune system is comprised of multiple components that play complementary roles in maintaining health. The innate immune system is often referred to as the first line of defense and includes natural barriers, such as intact skin, and cellular components, such as granulocytes. Defects in the innate immune system provide an opportunity for invasion and infection from a wide variety of pathogens. For example, breaches in skin integrity associated with invasive medical devices provide one of the most common immune defects of critically ill children.

The adaptive or acquired immune system is characterized by cellular and soluble factors that provide protection against specific pathogens. Examples include antibodies that are specific for a surface protein on an organism, or cytotoxic T-lymphocytes that can attack a specific virus. Typically, adaptive immune responses arise after exposure to either natural infection or vaccination. However, adaptive immunity can be passively provided in select circumstances, such as the infusion of botulinum toxin immunoglobulin for children with infant botulism.

Developmental Considerations

At the time of birth, a neonate is considered to be fundamentally immunocompromised for several reasons.14 First, although infants born at term have passively acquired immunity from maternal antibodies that were transferred transplacentally before birth, the titers of these antibodies quickly wane, leaving the infant without immunity to most specific pathogens. Until exposure to common pathogens by natural infection or immunization, infants lack durable organism-specific immunity. In addition, the function of specific components of the immune system does not mature until approximately 2 years of age. Until that time, infants are unable to make a robust antibody response to pathogens that have polysaccharide molecules on their surface. This developmental defect explains why the incidence of invasive pneumococcal infection, an organism with a polysaccharide coat, is relatively high in young children.

The transfer of maternal antibodies during fetal life occurs chiefly in the last trimester of gestation. The premature infant, born before the last trimester, lacks those transfused maternal antibodies, and therefore has a higher risk of infection, especially during the first months of life.

Infectious Disease Overview

Infection is a common cause and can be a common complication of critical illness in hospitalized children.45 Common community-acquired infections such as bacterial pneumonia and viral infections can lead to life-threatening illnesses in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised children. Local and systemic complications of community-acquired infections include respiratory failure, shock, and renal insufficiency. Critically ill children are also at high risk of healthcare-acquired infections including catheter-associated bloodstream infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and surgical site infections. These infections can be caused by viruses, bacteria, or fungal organisms.

Colonization and Infection

At birth, a neonate is normally essentially sterile. Within hours, however, bacteria from both the environment and people who handle the infant are transferred onto and begin to grow on the baby’s skin and mucous membranes.20 These bacteria are typically referred to as colonizing flora. The predominant colonizing organisms vary with anatomic site. For example, skin organisms such as Staphylococcus epidermidis can be found on almost all keratinized skin. In contrast, anaerobic and gram-negative organisms are typically found only in the intestinal tract. Colonizing flora typically do not cause inflammation or invasive infection. Many infections, however, do arise from the patient’s colonizing flora, often when a medical device breaches the integrity of skin or mucous membranes or when skin or mucous membranes become inflamed.

Common clinical conditions

Allergic Reactions and Anaphylaxis

Etiology

Allergic or “hypersensitivity” reactions occur when the body mounts an exaggerated or inappropriate immune response to a substance perceived as foreign, resulting in local or general tissue damage. Such reactions are usually classified by severity and involvement,1 as in types I to IV (Table 16-1).

Table 16-1 Hypersensitivity Reactions

Type Description Example
Type I (anaphylactic reaction) Triggered in response to an exposure to an environmental antigen
Mediated by IgE antibodies that bind to specific receptors on the surface of mast cells and basophils
Results in the release of a host of mediators to produce a classic anaphylactic response
Anaphylaxis
Asthma
Allergic rhinitis, hay fever
Type II (tissue specific hypersensitivity) Triggered by the presence of an antigen found only on a cell or tissue
Mediated by antibody (usually IgM, but also IgG) through two different mechanisms (complement and Fc receptors on phagocytes)
Results in the destruction of the antibody-coated cell with consequences dependent on the cell or body that is destroyed (e.g., RBC, WBC, or platelet)
ABO incompatibility
Rh incompatibility
Drug-induced thrombocytopenia
Type III (immune complex reaction) Triggered by the formation of antigen-antibody complexes that activate the complement cascade
Immune complexes are formed in the circulation and are later deposited in blood vessels or healthy tissue. Multiple forms of the response exist depending on the type and location of the antigen
Results in local edema and neutrophil attraction, and thus degradative lysosomal enzymes resulting in tissue injury
Serum sickness
Glomerulonephritis
Type IV (delayed hypersensitivity) Triggered by the recognition of an antigen mediated by activated T lymphocytes and release of lymphokines, which then stimulate the macrophage to phagocytize foreign invaders and some normal tissue
Results in a delayed onset. Does not have an antibody component; this response is strictly a cellular reaction
Contact sensitivities such as poison ivy and dermatitis
Tuberculin reactions
Graft rejection

RBC, Red blood cell; WBC, white blood cell.

From Roberts KE, Brinker D, Murante B. Hematology and immunology. In Slota M, editor: Core curriculum for pediatric critical care nursing, ed 2. Philadelphia, 2006, Saunders Elsevier, p. 597.

Anaphylaxis is an allergic hypersensitivity reaction to a foreign protein or drug that causes a systemic response. Exposure to the antigen may be oral or intravenous, or through inhalation or via direct contact. The anaphylactic reaction can occur within seconds or minutes after exposure.42

Reactions can range from mild itching and hives to life-threatening airway obstruction, hypotension, and cardiovascular collapse. Generally, the more the rapid the development of the reaction, the more severe will be the adverse reaction.

Clinical Signs and Symptoms

Signs and symptoms of hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis can develop within seconds or minutes after exposure. Patients often initially describe a sense of impending doom, accompanied by pruritus and flushing. This can evolve rapidly into other clinical manifestations of hypersensitivity (Table 16-2).

Table 16-2 Clinical Manifestations of Hypersensitivity Reactions

Organ System Clinical Manifestation(s)
Cutaneous/ocular Flushing, urticaria, angioedema, cutaneous and/or conjunctival pruritus, warmth, and swelling
Respiratory Nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, throat tightness, wheezing, shortness of breath, cough, hoarseness
Cardiovascular Dizziness, weakness, syncope, chest pain, palpitations
Gastrointestinal Dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, bloating, cramps
Neurologic Headache, dizziness, blurred vision, and seizure (very rare and often associated with hypotension)
Other Metallic taste, feeling of impending doom

Data from Linzer JF: Pediatrics, anaphylaxis. 2008. Emedicine, http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/799744-overview.

Once the clinical manifestations of the reaction become systemic, anaphylaxis is present. Mild symptoms include irritability, coughing, anxiety, disorientation, erythema, hives, and itching. Severe symptoms include dyspnea; cyanosis; difficulty speaking; swelling of the tongue, face, and airways; intense coughing; chest tightness; wheezing; stridor; laryngospasm; seizures; sense of impending doom; hypotension; and cardiorespiratory arrest.23

Management

When a patient develops signs of a severe hypersensitivity reaction or anaphylaxis, immediately stop the causative infusion or remove the offending agent (if known) and call for assistance (i.e., activate emergency response and notify a physician). Support the patient’s airway, oxygenation, and ventilation and circulation as necessary and initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation if needed. Healthcare providers should always be prepared for further patient deterioration, particularly if symptoms develop soon after the exposure.

Evaluation of airway and breathing includes assessment of oxygenation and ventilation. Administer supplementary oxygen as needed. In extreme cases, intubation and mechanical ventilation will be required. In patients with laryngeal or tracheal edema, an emergent tracheostomy may be needed.

Establish vascular access, ideally with two large-bore vascular catheters and be prepared to administer fluid boluses (to treat relative hypovolemia resulting from vasodilation and increased capillary permeability) and vasoactive support (e.g., an epinephrine infusion) to restore and maintain adequate blood pressure and systemic perfusion. (For further information, please refer to Chapter 6.)

Epinephrine 1:1000 is administered intramuscularly in the prehospital setting, but is administered intravenously (if arrest has occurred or is imminent, it can be administered by intraosseous route) in the hospital setting. Additional vasoactive medications such as norepinephrine may also be required to maintain blood pressure and systemic perfusion.

Medications typically used to treat anaphylactic reactions include oxygen, IM epinephrine (an infusion may be needed for refractory hypotension), diphenhydramine (and possibly an H2-blocker antihistamine), albuterol nebulizer, and methylprednisolone.10,23 Antihistamines are administered to antagonize the effects of histamine. Bronchodilators relax bronchial smooth muscles. Corticosteroids are antiinflammatory agents to enhance the effects of bronchodilators. (For further information, please refer to Chapter 6.)

Skin testing may help identify patients who may experience a hypersensitivity reaction with a known high-risk agent. Patients are given a small intradermal test dose of the agent and are monitored for at least 20   minutes.17 Emergency equipment and medications should be readily available. Patients receiving medications or agents with a higher risk of producing anaphylactic reaction and those with a history of anaphylaxis should be identified and monitored appropriately.

When a patient has a known allergy or hypersensitivity reaction to a drug, premedications may be prescribed before the agent is administered. Medications commonly used for pretreatment are corticosteroids, antihistamines, and antipyretics.17 Patients with known hypersensitivity responses should wear medical alert jewelry and should have an anaphylaxis kit (epinephrine autoinjector pen) readily available.

Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)

Etiology

In 1992, the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) and the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) introduced definitions3 for systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis, severe sepsis, septic shock, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS).

SIRS is a state of inflammatory/immune activation. SIRS is present when the adult patient demonstrates two or more of the following variables3,8a:

SIRS is nonspecific and can be caused by a number of diverse clinical conditions (Table 16-3), including ischemia, inflammation, trauma, infection, or a combination of several insults. SIRS does not always occur as a result of infection. A number of underlying conditions may predispose patients to infections with specific pathogens and the development of SIRS (Table 16-4).

Table 16-3 Infectious and Noninfectious Causes of SIRS

Infectious Causes Noninfectious Causes
Bacterial sepsis
Burn wound infections
Candidiasis
Cellulitis
Cholecystitis
Community-acquired pneumonia
Infective endocarditis
Influenza
Intraabdominal infections
Meningitis
Healthcare-acquired pneumonia
Pyelonephritis
Toxic shock syndrome
Urinary tract infections
Autoimmune disorders
Burns
Chemical aspiration
Dehydration
Erythema multiforme
(Stevens-Johnson syndrome)
Hemorrhagic shock
Intestinal perforation
Pancreatitis
Surgical procedures
Transfusion reactions
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Vasculitis

From Burdette SD, et al: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Emedicine, http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/168943-overview. Updated July 20, 2010. Accessed April 27, 2011.

Table 16-4 Predisposing Conditions/Risk Factors for Development of SIRS

Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) Predisposes to SIRS from both typical and unusual pathogens, particularly pneumococcus
Hemoglobin SS (Sickle Cell) disease 400-Fold increased risk of sepsis caused by pneumococcus and Salmonella, among other pathogens
Congenital heart disease (with few exceptions) Risk for endocarditis (see Endocarditis in Chapter 8) and SIRS
Genitourinary anomalies May increase the risk of urosepsis
Significant burns Risk of SIRS, caused by skin flora and nosocomial gram-negative pathogens in particular
Splenic dysfunction or absence, as well as complement, immunoglobulin, and properdin deficiency Predispose to infection from encapsulated organisms and resulting sepsis
Hematologic and solid-organ malignancies (before or during treatment) Increased risk for SIRS from many organisms
Hospitalization (particularly if prolonged, in the critical care unit, or with invasive devices) Increased risk of SIRS; prolonged stay and invasive devices increase risk of infection
Indwelling devices or prosthetic material and other breaches in barrier protective function Increased risk of SIRS

Modified from Burdette SD, et al: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Emedicine, http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/168943-overview. Updated July 20, 2010. Accessed April 27, 2011.

Pathophysiology

Inflammation is the body’s response to nonspecific insults that arise from chemical, traumatic, or infectious stimuli. The inflammatory cascade is a complex process that involves humoral and cellular responses and complement, and cytokine cascades. This inflammatory response, regardless of cause, generally has the same pathophysiologic properties; minor differences are caused by the inciting factor.

Trauma, inflammation, or infection leads to the activation of the inflammatory cascade. The proinflammatory interleukins either function directly on tissue or work via secondary mediators to activate the coagulation cascade, the complement cascade, and the release of nitric oxide, platelet-activating factor, prostaglandins, and leukotrienes. Activation of the white blood cells leads to secretion of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), a proinflammatory mediator (TNF derived its name from the fact that it causes hemorrhagic necrosis of tumors). Messenger RNA for TNF is normally present in tissues throughout the body, and levels of TNF rise early in the inflammatory process, leading to further vasodilation, capillary leak, and release or activation of additional cytokines (vasoactive peptides), including platelet-activating factor and many interleukins. The complement cascade is designed to coat invading organisms, making them vulnerable to phagocytosis. Activation of the complement cascade includes activation of the coagulation cascade (described further in the following paragraphs and later section, Sepsis and Septic Shock).

Numerous proinflammatory polypeptides are found within the complement cascade. Two of these, protein complements C3a and C5a, contribute directly to the release of additional cytokines, causing vasodilatation and increasing vascular permeability. Prostaglandins and leukotrienes incite endothelial damage, leading to multiorgan system failure (MOSF).

More than 15 years ago, Bone4 described the relationship between these complex inflammatory interactions. He described SIRS and MOSF as a five-stage process (Table 16-5). His definitions remain very helpful today.

Table 16-5 Bone’s Five Stages of SIRS and Multiple Organ System Failure (MOSF)

Stage 1

Stage 2

Stage 3

Stage 4 Stage 5

From Bone RC: Immunologic dissonance: a continuing evolution in our understanding of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). Ann Intern Med 125(8):680-687, 1998.

The relationship between inflammation and coagulation directly affects the potential clinical progression of SIRS. Interleukin-1 (IL-1) and TNF-α directly affect endothelial surfaces, leading to the expression of tissue factor. Tissue factor initiates the production of thrombin, thereby promoting coagulation; tissue factor is also a proinflammatory mediator. Fibrinolysis is impaired by IL-1 and TNF-α through production of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1.

Proinflammatory cytokines also disrupt the naturally occurring antiinflammatory mediators, antithrombin, and activated protein-C (APC). If unchecked, this coagulation cascade leads to complications of microvascular thrombosis, including organ dysfunction. The complement system also plays a role in the coagulation cascade. Infection-related procoagulant activity is generally more severe than that produced by trauma.

The cumulative effect of this inflammatory cascade is an unbalanced state with inflammation and coagulation. To counteract the acute inflammatory response, the body is equipped to reverse this process via a counter-inflammatory response syndrome (CARS). Co-morbidities and other factors can influence a patient’s ability to respond appropriately. The balance of SIRS and CARS determines a patient’s prognosis after an insult. Some researchers believe that, because of CARS, many of the new medications meant to inhibit the proinflammatory mediators may lead to deleterious immunosuppression.4

If SIRS is identified and reversed early, the subsequent inflammatory cascade can often be avoided or mitigated. However, in some situations, the cascade continues because the insult or the resultant host inflammatory response is too great. This damage can trigger cardiovascular dysfunction (increased cardiac output, peripheral vasodilation, maldistribution of blood flow, and impaired oxygen utilization), with resultant shock and a hypermetabolic state (i.e., warm shock).

If SIRS continues to progress, cardiac output may fall, peripheral vascular resistance may increase, and shunting of blood may ensue (i.e., cold shock). This results in development of tissue hypoxia, end-organ dysfunction, metabolic acidosis, end-organ injury and/or failure, and can be fatal.35

Clinical Signs and Symptoms

Fever is the most common presenting symptom of children with SIRS. Fever is one component of the triad of hyperthermia (or hypothermia), tachypnea, and tachycardia that typifies the earliest, mildest manifestation of SIRS. The international consensus terminology defines SIRS in children as present when the patient demonstrates two or more of the following (see details in Box 16-1)18:

Management

Treatment of SIRS is focused on treating the inciting cause. Empiric antibiotics are not administered routinely to all patients. Indications for empiric antimicrobial therapy include suspected or diagnosed infectious etiology, hemodynamic instability, neutropenia, and asplenia.8a Broad spectrum antibiotics are initiated when there is concern for an infectious cause but no definitive infection has been diagnosed.

Drotrecogin alpha, a recombinant form of human recombinant activated protein C (APC), reduces microvascular dysfunction by reducing inflammation and coagulation and increasing fibrinolysis. It has been hypothesized that APC may be beneficial in the management of SIRS. However, the supporting evidence to date is limited. In the prospective, randomized multicenter controlled PROWESS trial,2 mortality was reduced by 28% in adult patients with severe sepsis who received APC. Patients who received APC also demonstrated significantly more bleeding than control patients. However, a Cochrane meta-analysis of adult trials25 involving over 4000 patients (including some children who were not randomized) did not find overall evidence of improved survival when APC was administered; a multicenter pediatric study was halted because excessive bleeding occurred when children received APC.

APC currently has no role in the routine management of SIRS unless the presentation is consistent with septic shock. Although APC may be considered in the management of severe septic shock in adolescents and adults (see section, Sepsis and Septic Shock), it is not routinely used in pediatric patients.

Fluid resuscitation should be initiated in those patients who exhibit signs of hypovolemia and hypovolemic shock (see section, Sepsis and Septic Shock and Chapter 6). All patients require establishment of adequate intravenous access. Administer isotonic fluids boluses (typically 20   mL/kg boluses; smaller volumes may be used in children with poor myocardial function) as needed to treat shock and monitor hemodynamic status closely.22,33 If signs of shock are present, antibiotics, aggressive fluid resuscitation and vasoactive support should be provided within the first hour after the onset of symptoms (see section, Sepsis and Septic Shock and Chapter 6).5

Assess and support adequate oxygenation and ventilation. The oxyhemoglobin saturation in the superior vena cava (SCVO2) allows tracking of the balance between oxygen delivery and oxygen use; therapy should be titrated to maintain this SCVO2 70% or higher.5 Patients with increased oxygen requirement should receive supplementary oxygen. Intubation and mechanical ventilation may be required in some patients.

Sepsis and Septic Shock

Management

The management of pediatric sepsis and septic shock is targeted at maintaining cardiopulmonary stability and preventing or correcting metabolic abnormalities.21 The 2007 update to the ACCM guidelines for the hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal patients with septic shock5 emphasizes the importance of early antibiotics and aggressive fluid resuscitation and use of vasoactive agents among other age-specific therapies to achieve time-sensitive goals (Fig. 16-1).

image

Fig. 16-1 Suggestions for hemodynamic support in pediatric septic shock.

BP, Blood pressure; CI, cardiac index; SVRI, systemic vascular resistance index.

Based on recommendations of Brierley J, Carcillo JA, Choong K, Cornell T, et al: Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock: 2007 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 37:666–688, 2009.

Nursing care measures to reduce risk of infection

Infection Control: Basic Principles

Hospitals and healthcare systems now recognize the importance of protecting the critically ill child from developing healthcare-acquired infections (HAIs). HAIs are a serious problem for hospitalized children; they contribute to increased morbidity, mortality, and cost of care.11 For example, investigators have demonstrated that catheter-associated bloodstream infections have an attributable mortality of 10% to 35%, can prolong hospitalization by an average of 7 days, and increase hospital costs up to $39,000 per episode.45 New technologies are under investigation to attempt to reduce the incidence of these infections. Approaches include use of antiseptic- or antibiotic-impregnated catheters, use of maximal sterile barrier during placement of catheters, and consistent use of effective skin disinfectants (i.e., chlorhexidine gluconate/70% isopropyl alcohol). Risk factors for HAI in critically ill children are highlighted in Table 16-6.

Table 16-6 Risk Factors for Healthcare-Acquired Infections

Type of Infection Risk Factors
Catheter-related bloodstream infection Arterial catheter
Multiple venous catheters
Transport out of the critical care unit (e.g., to operating room or radiology)
Genetic syndrome
Ventilator-associated pneumonia Invasive ventilation
Reintubation
Genetic syndrome
Immunodeficiency
Aspiration of oropharyngeal or gastric secretions
Surgical site infection Malnutrition
Steroid use
Inappropriate perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis
Placement of prosthetic material or device
Multidrug resistant organism (MDRO) infection History of transplantation or preexisting lung disease
Presence of an indwelling medical device
Duration and spectrum of antibiotic exposure
Viral infection Young age
Multi-bed room
Poor adherence to standard and transmission-based precautions

Using Standard and Expanded Precautions to Prevent Disease Transmission (SC)

One of the most important aspects of infection prevention and control is the prevention of microorganism transmission between patients and between healthcare workers and patients. Standard precautions should be used for every patient encounter,37 regardless of the setting in which care is being delivered.

Hand hygiene is one of the most basic, yet most important strategies in infection prevention and control by healthcare providers. And yet, healthcare providers continue to struggle to comply with the Recommendations of the 2002 Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force.9 See Table 16-7 for a summary of these recommendations.

Table 16-7 Hand Hygiene for Healthcare Workers

Indications for hand washing and/or hand antisepsis

Wash hands before and after every patient contact.

Before eating and after using a restroom, wash hands with a non-antimicrobial soap and water or with an antimicrobial soap and water.

Consider antimicrobial-impregnated wipes (i.e., towelettes) as an alternative to washing hands with non-antimicrobial soap and water. Because they are not as effective as alcohol-based hand rubs or washing hands with an antimicrobial soap and water for reducing bacterial counts on the hands of healthcare workers, they are not a substitute for using an alcohol-based hand rub or antimicrobial soap.

Wash hands with non-antimicrobial soap and water or with antimicrobial soap and water if there is risk of exposure to Bacillus anthracis (suspected or proven). The physical action of washing and rinsing hands under such circumstances is recommended because alcohols, chlorhexidine, iodophors, and other antiseptic agents have poor activity against spores.

No recommendation can be made regarding the routine use of non-alcohol-based hand rubs for hand hygiene in healthcare settings.

Hand hygiene technique

Surgical hand antisepsis Selection of hand hygiene agents Skin care Other aspects Healthcare worker educational and motivational programs Administrative measures

Adapted from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings: Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. MMWR 51(RR-16):32-34, 2002.

For patients with known or suspected infection with pathogens of epidemiologic significance, expanded transmission-based precautions should also be employed, particularly during hospitalization. Table 16-8 categorizes the appropriate expanded precautions needed to prevent the spread of specific organisms, and Table 16-9 summarizes the types of expanded precautions.

Table 16-8 Modes of Organism Transmission and Isolation Precautions

Mode of Transmission Isolation Precaution

Standard

Contact

Droplet

Airborne

Table 16-9 Isolation Precautions for Specific Infections

Isolation Precautions Clinical Example
Standard
Airborne
Droplet
Contact

Specific diseases

Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Disorder (SCID)

Etiology

Severe combined immunodeficiency disorder (SCID) is a rare combined B- and T-lymphocyte disorder. Estimations of incidence range from 1:70,000 to 1:1,000,000 live births, but may be as frequent as 1:35,000.27,44 The majority of cases are inherited in an X-linked or autosomal recessive pattern. SCID is fatal if untreated and is considered a pediatric emergency. In most cases survival requires expeditious stem cell transplantation.

Pathophysiology

SCID occurs as the result of mutations in 1 of 10 known genes.36 There are many variants of the disorder ranging from partial to almost complete loss of T-lymphocyte function. X-linked SCID is the most common form. Other forms of SCID usually follow an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern or are the result of spontaneous mutations. One of these other forms is linked to a deficiency of the enzyme adenosine deaminase (ADA). B and T lymphocytes produce chemicals that can accumulate to toxic levels within these cells. Normally, these cells produce an enzyme (ADA) that destroys the excess toxins. When this vital “detoxifying enzyme” is missing, these toxins accumulate, “poisoning” the B and T lymphocytes.

Clinical Signs and Symptoms

SCID is characterized by multiple severe or recurrent illnesses such as dermatitis, otitis media, and diarrhea.36 Infection is not present at birth, because the infant is protected from bacterial infections by transplacental delivery of maternal IgG antibody. However, signs and symptoms of infection develop soon after birth with the majority of cases presenting in patients less than 3 months of age.36

Infants with SCID frequently develop a severe skin rash with red, peeling skin during the first few weeks of life. This rash may resemble eczema, but is more diffuse and typically does not respond to topical corticosteroids. Superinfection of the skin with Staphylococcus aureus is often seen.

Infections are characteristic in terms of severity, recurrence (persistent in nature), type of organism, and location. Common sites of infection include the respiratory tract, mucous membranes, liver, GI tract, and blood. Bacterial infections such as otitis media, pneumonia, and skin infections develop frequently. Infants have recurrent mucocutaneous infections with Candida that is resistant to therapy. This candidal esophagitis can result in poor feeding and poor weight gain. Chronic diarrhea responds weakly to alterations in diet and may become life threatening.

Recurrent, severe, and sometimes fatal infections occur with common viruses such as adenovirus, parainfluenza, and varicella. Opportunistic infections including Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) are the hallmarks of a T-cell immune defect. Their presence should immediately prompt investigation for an underlying immune defect. In children with SCID, PCP infection is frequently fatal.

Management

Early immune reconstitution offers the best chance of long-term survival. Bone marrow or stem cell transplantation can be performed within the first 3 months of life, with reported survival as high as 97%.7 Donors may be human leukocyte antigen-identical siblings, cord blood units, or matched unrelated donors identified through the national registries or haploidentical parents. Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) using stem cells obtained from a related, HLA-identical donor (RID) is the optimal treatment for patients with SCID. In the absence of a RID, HLA-mismatched related donors (MMRDs) are often used. However, compared with RIDs, use of MMRDs for BMT is associated with reduced survival and inferior long-term immune reconstitution. Grunebaum and co-workers19 found that use of HLA-matched unrelated donors (MUDs) had an 80% cure rate for SCID and are associated with long-term robust immune reconstitution. They suggest that this mode of treatment may be an important therapeutic alternative for patients with SCID when a RID is not available.

Before transplantation, supportive care is essential. This includes prophylaxis against PCP pneumonia with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and administration of intravenous gammaglobulin. Infants with SCID may have severe, sometimes fatal reactions after vaccination with live vaccines (e.g., for measles-mumps-rubella or varicella). As a result, these live vaccines are contraindicated for all children with SCID.

When transfusion is required, CMV-negative, leuko-depleted, irradiated blood products are administered. The development of graft-versus-host disease has been described in infants with SCID after a blood transfusion. Because more than half of SCIDs are caused by an X-linked defect, genetic counseling is important for parents and siblings to determine their carrier status.

Diarrhea may result from persistent infection, rotavirus, Giardia lamblia, or malabsorption. The use of an elemental formula may be helpful to reduce the diarrhea. If there is severe weight loss or failure to thrive, parenteral nutrition may be necessary.

Meningococcemia

Pathophysiology

N. meningitidis is transmitted from person to person via direct contact with infected droplets of respiratory secretions. Carriers are often asymptomatic at the time of transmission. Immunity to N. meningitidis is thought to be acquired through intermittent nasal carriage of meningococci and antigenic cross-reaction with enteric flora during the first two decades of life.16 Once the bacteria colonize and cross the nasal mucosa, disease symptoms often appear within 10 days.

The virulence or severity of meningococcemia is related to the release of endotoxin. The endotoxin of meningococcus is structurally different from that of other gram-negative bacteria.34 Levels of endotoxin correlate with the severity of illness and may be 50- to 100-fold that occurring with other gram-negative infections.

The clinical manifestations of meningococcemia result from capillary leak, myocardial failure, coagulopathy, and metabolic derangement. These processes work together to produce a state of multisystem organ failure that typically causes cardiorespiratory dysfunction and, frequently, renal, neurologic, and gastrointestinal dysfunction.30

In the first 2 to 4 days after onset of illness, there is a massive increase in vascular permeability with resulting capillary leak. Initially, the body compensates through normal homeostatic mechanisms, including vasoconstriction. As the capillary leak continues, hypovolemia develops. This hypovolemia leads to decreased venous return and cardiac output. Vasodilation and maldistribution of blood flow contribute to inadequate tissue perfusion, tissue hypoxia, and lactic acidosis, and may produce cell death and organ dysfunction. For additional information, see Chapter 6.

Hypovolemia and maldistribution of blood flow are primary causes of cardiovascular collapse, although they may be further complicated by development of myocardial dysfunction. Myocarditis, pericarditis, or direct bacterial invasion of the heart may contribute to this cardiac dysfunction.

Patients with meningococcemia often present with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The combination of microvascular thrombosis and bleeding (caused by initiation of the clotting cascade) is particularly challenging to manage. DIC, in combination with the described hypoxia and hypovolemia, can cause significant end-organ damage. Waterhouse-Friderichsen syndrome (massive adrenal hemorrhage) can complicate meningococcemia and may further exacerbate cardiovascular collapse. See Chapter 15 for additional information about DIC.

Clinical Signs and Symptoms

The clinical manifestations of meningococcal disease can be extremely variable, ranging from the typical signs of meningitis to full-blown septic shock (Table 16-10). In cases of severe meningococcemia, the disease may progress extremely quickly, with death occurring within a few hours of the onset of symptoms. The classic petechial rash is considered to be pathognomic for meningococcemia. However, up to 20% of children with this disorder have no rash or petechiae at presentation.26

Table 16-10 Clinical Manifestations of Meningococcemia

System Clinical Manifestations
Neurologic/neuromuscular Headache
Photophobia
Lethargy
Neck stiffness
±Brudzinski sign
±Kernig sign
Seizures
Myalgia
Cardiovascular Tachycardia
Bradycardia
Hypotension
Cool extremities
Diminished peripheral pulses
Delayed capillary refill time
Respiratory Tachypnea
GI Vomiting
Abdominal pain
Skin Rash (may be erythematous initially and then progress to petechiae and purpura)

Management

Antibiotic therapy is the only definitive treatment for meningococcemia and should be initiated as soon as the diagnosis is made. The sequelae of this disease may be devastating, but N. meningitidis itself is relatively easy to eradicate. A blood culture should be obtained before initiation of antibiotic therapy but should not delay treatment. In a stable patient, a lumbar puncture may be performed. However, it may be deferred in those who are considered unstable or are exhibiting signs of increased intracranial pressure. Recommended antibiotic therapy may include cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, or penicillin G.28,32,41 Doses vary based on the patient’s clinical condition (i.e., presence or absence of associated meningitis).

Further management is aimed at restoring adequate oxygen and substrate delivery to the tissues. This is achieved through aggressive fluid resuscitation to replete intravascular volume, correction of DIC, and optimization of oxygenation and ventilation. Patients with meningococcemia may require as much as 80   mL/kg of crystalloid during the first hour of therapy and 240 mL/kg or more during the first 8   hours of therapy. This fluid is administered in boluses of 20   mL/kg per Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) guidelines.10,22,33 The child’s hemodynamic and cardiovascular status should be reassessed after each intervention. If shock persists after initial volume therapy, inotropic support is recommended, and should be instituted within the first hour of therapy, even if this requires administration via peripheral venous access. Epinephrine and dopamine may be used to improve myocardial contractility and enhance vasoconstriction.

After initial resuscitation and stabilization, afterload reducing agents such as milrinone are often needed. Arterial and central venous catheters should be placed to allow for close monitoring of hemodynamic status and response to interventions. Insertion of a central venous catheter should not delay administration of fluid boluses and vasoactive support; both can be initiated through large-bore peripheral venous catheters until a central venous catheter is placed. For additional information about management of septic shock, see Chapter 6.

Administration of corticosteroids in the pediatric patient with meningococcemia is controversial. In those patients who are at risk for adrenal insufficiency (those with chronic steroid use, recent steroid use, purpura fulminans, or hypothalamic, pituitary, or adrenal disease) or those with persistent hypotension after adequate volume resuscitation and initiation of inotropic support, it may be prudent to administer hydrocortisone.28 However, the safety and efficacy of stress-dose steroids as adjunctive therapy for pediatric septic shock have not been established.46 Glucocorticoid administration does add potential risks, including anti-anabolic effects, attenuated immunity, depressed wound healing, calcium mobilization, impaired insulin action, and associated hyperglycemia and possible alteration in brain development.46

Correction of DIC is essential to prevent complications such as intracranial bleeding, GI hemorrhage, and bleeding into skin lesions. Fresh-frozen plasma, platelets, cryoprecipitate, and factor VII are administered as indicated to correct specific deficiencies. Packed red blood cells are administered to restore hemoglobin concentration and improve oxygen carrying capacity. For additional information about management of DIC, see Chapter 15.

Optimizing oxygenation and ventilation typically requires the use of supplementary oxygen and mechanical ventilation. The patient with depressed level of consciousness may require endotracheal intubation to establish a patent airway and reduce risk of aspiration. If increased capillary permeability produces pulmonary edema, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (e.g., bi-level positive airway pressure) or ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure will be needed. For additional information, see Chapter 9.

Treatment of septic shock is presented in more detail in Chapter 6.

Infections Associated with Medical Devices or the Gastrointestinal Tract

Medical devices are among the greatest risk factors for healthcare-acquired infection (see Table 16-6).45 Central venous catheters, urinary catheters, and endotracheal tubes all provide portals of entry that permit organisms to migrate from the skin and mucous membranes to sterile body sites (Box 16-2). Implantable devices can also disrupt host defenses and provide a site sequestered from the surveillance of the immune system where bacteria can flourish. Box 16-3 lists common organisms related to medical devices.

The risk of device-related infections can be reduced by several important preventive measures.38 First, devices should only be used when they are essential to patient care. Strict aseptic technique must be observed during insertion or manipulation of a device. In addition, limiting the frequency of device manipulation reduces the likelihood of contamination. Finally, temporary devices should be removed as soon as they are no longer needed. Although the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis at the time of insertion is commonplace, the efficacy of such measures for many devices has not been established.

Recent advances in materials used for catheters and prosthetic devices have decreased rates of infection. The use of central venous catheters impregnated with antiseptics has been shown to reduce the incidence of both catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection in adult patients. However, few efficacy studies of these devices have been performed in children.

Central Venous Catheter Infections

Catheter-associated bloodstream infections are among the most common healthcare-acquired infection in hospitalized children. Catheter-associated infections include localized infection at the site of catheter entry, phlebitis, or bloodstream infection.

Evidence-based practices that are associated with a reduced risk of catheter-associated infections include: (1) use of maximal sterile barrier precautions (e.g., cap, mask, sterile gown, sterile gloves, and large sterile drape) during catheter placement; (2) use of 2-3% chlorhexidine gluconate/70% isopropyl alcohol or other appropriate antiseptic agents to prepare the skin before placement or during routine care of the catheter; (3) prompt removal of catheters as soon as they are no longer required; and (4) strict adherence to appropriate hand hygiene practices.29 For additional information, see Box 22-6.

In studies performed in adult critical care units, antiseptic impregnated catheters have been associated with reduced rates of catheter associated bloodstream infection8b,10b (Box 16-4). Studies performed in children have described delayed time to infection but not reduced infection rate associated with use of antibiotic-impregnated catheters.10a

Complications of catheter-related infection include sepsis and septic shock, endocarditis, septic thrombophlebitis, and metastatic infection with seeding of bone and organs (lung, kidneys, liver, spleen, brain, and skin). The prognosis for patients with a catheter-related infection is influenced by factors related to the pathogen, host, and therapy. If the infection is promptly identified and appropriate antimicrobial therapy is instituted, there can be a high rate of cure and salvage of the catheter. Delayed recognition or therapy for an infection is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Overall, fatality rates for central catheter bacteremia are 10% to 25%, with rates as high as 50% in critically ill patients.

Diagnostic tests

The most common diagnostic tests performed to evaluate critically ill children with a potential immune disorder or infectious process are hematology studies (including evaluation of hemoglobin and hematocrit) and evaluation of the white blood cell (WBC) count and differential. For quick reference, normal results of these and other common studies are listed in Tables 16-11 to 16-13.

Table 16-13 Other Diagnostic Studies

Diagnostic Test Normal Values Comments
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (Westergren) Child: 0-20   mm/hour
Adult male: 0-15   mm/hour
Adult female: 0-20   mm/hour
Nonspecific indicator of acute inflammatory response
Measures the amount of RBCs that settle in 1 hour
Reticulocyte count Newborns: 2-6%
Children: 0-2.8%
Adults: 0.5-1.5%
 
C-reactive protein (CRP) <6   mg/dL Increase within 6-8   h of onset of infection or injury
CRP is produced by the liver during periods of inflammation

Data from Pediatric Drug Lookup: Normal laboratory values for children. http://www.pediatriccareonline.org/pco/ub/view/Pediatric-Drug-Lookup/153930/0/Normal_Laboratory_Values_for_Children.%202010. Updated March 21, 2011. Accessed April 27, 2011.

References

1 Baines P.B., Hart C.A. Severe meningococcal disease in childhood. Br J Anesthes. 2003;90(1):72-83.

2 Bernard G.R., et al. Recombinant human protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) study group, Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis. NEJM. 2001;344(10):699-709.

3 Bone R.C., et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis, the ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. Chest. 1992;101:1644-1655.

4 Bone R.C. Immunologic dissonance: a continuing evolution in our understanding of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:680-777.

5 Brierley J., et al. Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock: 2007 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(2):666-681.

6 Bryant K., McDonald L.C. Clostridium difficile infections in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28:145-146.

7 Buckley R.H. Molecular defects in human severe combined immunodeficiency and approaches to immune reconstitution. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004;55:625-656.

8 . Burdette S.D., et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, Emedicine, http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/168943-overview, 2011 Page updated July 20, 2010. Accessed April 26 Casey A.L., Elliott T.S. Prevention of central venous catheter-related infection: update. Br J Nurs. 2010;19(2):78. 80, 82

9 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings: Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. MMWR. 2002;51(No. RR-16):32-34.

10 Chameides L., Samson R., Schexnayder S., Hazinski M.F.: Pediatric Advanced Life Support Provider Manual, Dallas. . American Heart Association 2011. editors: Part 10: management of shock

10a Chelliah A., Heydon K.H., Zaoutis T.E., et al. Observational trial of antibiotic-coated central venous catheters in critically ill pediatric patients. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007;26:816-820.

10b Cicalini S., Palmieri F., Petrosillo N. Clinical review: New technologies for prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Crit Care. 2007;8(3):157-162. Published online 2003 September 29. doi: 10.1186/cc2380

11 Coffin S.E., Zaoutis T.E. Healthcare-associated infections. In Long S., Pickering L., Prober C., editors: Principles and practice of pediatric infectious diseases, ed 3, Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, 2008.

12 Coffin S.E., et al. Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia in acute care hospitals. Infect Cont Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29:S31-S40.

13 Cohn A.C. Immunizations in the United States: a rite of passage. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2005;52:669-693.

14 de la Morena M. Immunologic development and susceptibility to infection. In Long S., Pickering L., Prober C., editors: Principles and practice of pediatric infectious diseases, ed 3, Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, 2008.

15 Dellinger R.P., et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. CCM. 2008;36(1):296-327.

16 Faust M.A., Cathie K., Levin M. Meningococcal infections. Emedicine http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/966333-overview, 2011. Updated July 20, 2010. Accessed April 27

17 Gobel B. Chemotherapy induced hypersensitivity reactions. Oncol Nursing Forum. 2005;32(5):1027-1055.

18 Goldstein B., et al. International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005;6:2-8.

19 Grunebaum E., et al. Bone marrow transplantation for severe combined immune deficiency. JAMA. 2006;295(5):508-518. 2006

20 Hunstad D.A., St. Geme J.W. Mechanisms of pediatric bacterial disease. In Bergelson J.A., editor: Pediatric infectious disease requisites, ed 1, Philadelphia: Mosby, 2008.

21 Khilnani P., Deopujari S., Carcillo J. Recent advances in sepsis and septic shock. Ind J Pediatr. 2008;75:821-830.

22 Kleinman M., et al. Part 14, pediatric advanced life support in 2010 American heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2010;122:S876-S908.

23 Linzer J.F. Pediatrics, anaphylaxis. Emedicine http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/799744-overview, 2008. Accessed January 15, 2012

24 Lo E., et al. Strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in acute care hospitals. Infect Cont Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29:901-994.

25 Marti-Carvajal A., Salanti G., Cardona A.F. Human recombinant activated protein C for severe sepsis. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. (1):2008. CD004388

26 Marzouk O., et al. Features and outcomes in meningococcal disease presenting with maculopapular rash. Arch Dis Child. 1991;66:485-487.

27 McGhee SA, Stiehm ER, McCabe ERB: Potential costs and benefits of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency. J Pediatr 147:603-608.

28 Milonovich L. Meningococcemia: epidemiology, pathophysiology and management. J Pediatr Healthcare. 2006;21:75-80.

29 O’Grady N.P., et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;35:1281-1307.

30 Pathan N., Faust S.N., Levin M. Pathophysiology of meningococcal meningitis and septicaemia. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88(7):601-607.

31 Pediatric Drug Lookup. Normal laboratory values for children. http://www.pediatriccareonline.org/pco/ub/view/Pediatric-Drug-Lookup/153930/0/Normal_Laboratory_Values_for_Children.%202010, 2011. Updated March 21, 2011. Accessed April 27

32 Pollard A.J., et al. Emergency management of meningococcal disease: eight years on. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92:283-286.

33 Ralston M., et al, editors. Pediatric advanced life support provider manual. Dallas: American Heart Association, 2006.

34 Rosenstein N.E., et al. Medical progress: meningococcal disease. NEJM. 2001;344:1378-1388.

34a Saint S., Wiese J., Amory J.K., et al. Are physicians aware of which of their patients have indwelling urinary catheters? Am J Med. 2000;109:476-480.

35 Santhanam S., Tolan R.W. Sepsis. Emedicine http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/972559-overview, 2011. Updated April 25, 2011. Accessed April 27

36 Schwartz R.A., Sinha S. Severe combined immunodeficiency. Emedicine http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/888072, 2010. Updated September 29, 2010. Accessed April 27

37 Siegel J.D., Grossman L. Pediatric infection prevention and control. In Long S., Pickering L., Prober C., editors: Principles and practice of pediatric infectious diseases, ed 3, Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, 2008.

38 Siegel J.D., et al. Preventing transmission of infectious agents in healthcare settings. http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/2007IP/2007isolationPrecautions.html.

39 Skippen P., et al. Sepsis and septic shock: progress and future considerations. Ind J Pediatr. 2008;75:599-607.

40 Stockwell J.A. Nosocomial infections in pediatric intensive care unit. Ped Crit Care Med. 2007;8:S21-S37.

41 Thielen U., et al. Management of invasive meningococcal disease in children and young people: summary of SIGN guidelines. BMJ. 2008;336:1367-1370.

42 Venes D., Taber C.W., editors. Taber’s cyclopedic medical dictionary, ed 20, Philadelphia: Davis, 2005.

43 Wong H. Sepsis/inflammatory response syndrome. In: Conway E., editor. Pediatric multiprofessional critical care review. Des Plaines, IL: Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2006.

44 Yee A., et al. Severe combined immunodeficiency: a national surveillance study. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2008;19:298-302.

45 Zaoutis T.E., Coffin S.E. Clinical syndromes of device-associated infections. In Long S., Pickering L., Prober C., editors: Principles and practice of pediatric infectious diseases, ed 3, Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, 2008.

46 Zimmerman J.J. A history of adjunctive glucocorticoid treatment for pediatric sepsis: moving beyond steroid pulp fiction toward evidence-based medicine. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2007;8(6):530-539.