Immunological Tolerance

Published on 18/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Allergy and Immunology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3482 times

Chapter 19 Immunological Tolerance

Summary

Immunological tolerance is the state of unresponsiveness to a particular antigen which is primarily established in T- and B-lymphocytes. The clonal receptors of lymphocytes are generated by random recombination of the many genes that code for the antigen binding regions. This creates the need to sort out dangerous receptors that could recognize and destroy self tissues. The breakdown of immunological tolerance to self-antigens is the cause of autoimmune diseases.

Immunological tolerance is achieved by many different mechanisms operating on different cell types.

Central tolerance refers to the selection processes which T cell precursors undergo in the thymus before they are released as mature naive T cells. Thymic epithelial cells and dendritic cells present self-antigens to the immature T cell precursors. Those T cell precursors that respond strongly to the self-antigens presented in the thymus undergo apoptosis. This is called negative selection. A specialized population of thymic epithelial cells is capable of expressing genes which are expressed in a strictly organ specific manner (e.g. insulin, which is expressed only in the pancreas and the thymus).

Peripheral tolerance refers to the diverse mechanism that enforce and maintain T-cell tolerance outside the thymus. These include the prevention of contact between auto-reactive T-cells and their target antigens (immunological ignorance), the peripheral deletion of auto-reactive T-cells by activation induced cell death or cytokine withdrawal, the incapacity of T cells to mount effector responses upon recognizing their target antigen (anergy), and the suppression of immune responses by regulatory T cells.

B cell tolerance is established by several mechanisms including clonal deletion of autoreactive B cells, mostly in the bone marrow; the rearrangement of autoreactive B cell receptors (receptor editing) or by B cell anergy. In addition B-cell tolerance is maintained by tolerant T cells. The production of high-affinity class-switched antibodies depends on T-cell help. Therefore, if tolerance to a particular antigen is firmly established in the T-cell compartment, B-cells that recognize this antigen will usually remain tolerant.

To establish or re-establish tolerance is a major goal for innovative treatments for autoimmunity, allergy and transplantation. In contrast, to overcome immunological tolerance is one major goal for innovative treatments against cancer.

Generation of autoreactive antigen receptors during lymphocyte development

The specificity of the antigen receptors of T cells and B cells is the result of random shuffling of the many genes that encode the antigen-binding site of these receptors. Theoretically, this process could generate more than 1015 different T-cell receptors, including some that can bind to autoantigens (Fig. 19.1). Similar considerations apply to B-cell receptors. Cells expressing such receptors are often called self-reactive lymphocytes. The immune system has to fulfill two contradictory requirements: on the one hand the repertoire of different antigen receptors needs to be as large as possible to avoid ‘holes in the repertoire’ that could be exploited by pathogens to evade immune detection. On the other hand, the receptor repertoire must be shaped to prevent the immune system from attacking the organism that harbors it. Any disturbance in this delicately balanced system can have pathogenic or even lethal consequences, either from infections or from the unwanted reaction with autoantigens or harmless external antigens as in allergy. This paradox was recognized at the beginning of the last century by Paul Ehrlich who coined the term ‘horror autotoxicus’ for the necessity to avoid immunological reactions against self-antigens. Tolerance is the process that eliminates or neutralizes such autoreactive cells, and a breakdown of this system can cause autoimmunity. To avoid autoreactivity the randomly generated repertoire of T- and B-cell receptors is censored by several different mechanisms. CD4+ TH cells are pivotal for the multitude of immunological mechanisms that induce and maintain immunological tolerance. In this chapter we will discuss immunological tolerance in B cells and conventional αβ TCR expressing T cells.

T cell tolerance

T cell tolerance is established at two levels. Immature thymocytes undergo harsh selection processes in the thymus. This is often called central tolerance and results in the deletion of most T cells with high affinity for self antigens. Mature T cells are also regulated to avoid self-reactivity. The mechanisms that reinforce T cell tolerance outside the thymus are collectively called peripheral tolerance.

Central T-cell tolerance develops in the thymus

The chief mechanism of T-cell tolerance is the deletion of self-reactive T cells in the thymus. Immature T cell precursors migrate from the bone marrow to the thymus. There, they proliferate, differentiate and undergo selection processes before a selected few re-enter the blood stream as mature naive T cells. These differentiation and selection processes depend on interactions with thymic epithelial cells and dendritic cells in specialized microenvironments within the thymus (Fig. 19.2).

Generation of their clonal TCR is the first step in T cell development

In the thymus the T cell precursors – also called thymocytes – start to express the recombinase-activating gene (RAG) products and begin to rearrange their αβ TCR genes. T cell precursors that enter the thymus express neither CD4 nor CD8 and are, therefore, called double negative (DN) thymocytes. The DN precursors actively proliferate, undergoing approximately 20 cell divisions and assemble the TCR β chain. Only those DN cells that have successfully rearranged a TCR β chain will progress to the next stage and express CD4 and CD8 simultaneously. These immature CD4+CD8+ double positive (DP) thymocytes start to reassemble TCR α chains and express T cell receptors (TCR). The randomly rearranged TCRs expressed by the DP thymocytes collectively constitute the organism’s unselected TCR repertoire which is also called the germline repertoire. These thymocytes undergo processes of positive and negative selection. Less than 5% of them survive these selection events and are allowed to exit the thymus as naive mature T cells.

In addition to αβ T cells, other lineages including natural killer T (NKT) cells and γδ T cells also develop in the thymus. Although much less is known about thymic selection of γδ T cells there are profound differences in the thymic development of γδ T cells and αβ T cells. Ligand mediated selection events do not seem to be required for the selection of the γδ T cell repertoire. In contrast, instruction for particular effector functions occurs in the thymus for γδ T cells. Given the many current uncertainties about γδ T cell selection and NKT selection in the thymus, this section will deal exclusively with thymic selection of αβ T cells.

Positive selection occurs predominantly in the thymic cortex

Specialized APC, the cortical thymic epithelial cells (cTECs) are pivotal for positive selection. cTECs differ in their antigen processing machinery (cathepsins, proteasome subunits) from hematopoietic antigen presenting cells. Given that the number of different peptides that can be presented by any particular MHC molecule is much smaller than the number of different TCRs that undergo positive selection, each peptide must be involved in positively selecting many different T cells. Accordingly, experiments have demonstrated that the peptide on which a TCR is positively selected does not need to share sequence similarity with the peptides recognized by that same TCR in the periphery.

Note that positive selection depends on the recognition of self-peptides bound to self-MHC. The TCRs that are positively selected based on low-affinity interactions with self-peptide/MHC form the selected repertoire that ultimately recognizes microbial antigens, to protect the organism from infectious diseases. This is one illustration for the flexibility of antigen recognition by T cells. The peptides that mediate positive selection in the thymus are also presented outside the thymus where they support survival of mature T cells and may also act as co-agonists that enhance T cell activation by agonist peptides.

An immediate question is why T cells which were selected based upon self-recognition usually do not cause damage to the organism. One answer is that the threshold for TCR signaling is lower in immature DP T cells in the thymus than in mature T cells in the periphery. Thus, DP T cells can respond to low-affinity interaction with peptide/MHC complexes that would not trigger mature T cells. One important regulator of this TCR signaling threshold is the microRNA miR-181a that regulates the expression of several phosphatases involved in TCR signaling. DP T cells express much higher levels of miR181a than mature SP T cells.

A library of self antigens is presented to developing T cells in the thymus

The induction of central tolerance requires the presence of autoantigens in the thymus. This poses an obvious problem for thymic selection: Some autoantigens, e.g. insulin are expressed in a tissue-specific manner, are frequently called tissue-restricted antigens (TRAs). The question, then, is (how) do TRAs get into the thymus for presentation to developing T cells? Some might be brought into the thymus by immigrating antigen presenting cells but it is highly unlikely that this would yield a reliable representation of the organism’s TRAs. Moreover, developmentally regulated TRAs, e.g. antigens that are only expressed after puberty, would not gain access to the fetal thymus. The answer is that specialized cells in the thymus, the medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs) express proteins that are otherwise strictly tissue restricted. This has been called ectopic or promiscuous gene expression (Fig. 19.3).

MTECS express several hundreds or even thousands of functionally and structurally highly diverse antigens that represent almost all tissues in the body. Importantly, mTECs express not only tissue restricted antigens but also developmentally regulated antigens. Thus, gene expression in mTECs is uncoupled from spatial and developmental regulation. The exact mechanisms of this promiscuous gene expression are not yet fully understood. It has become clear that not all mTECs express all TRAs. Any particular TRA is expressed by less than 5% of mTECs.

Whereas mTECs are the only cells known to be capable of promiscuous gene expression, they are not the only cells important for negative selection. Thymic dendritic cells can take up TRAs expressed by mTECs and cross-present these TRAs to T cells. Recent intravital imaging studies have yielded the estimate that a thymocyte makes contact with approximately 500 dendritic cells during its sojourn in the thymic medulla. Although we do not have experimentally based quantitative estimates for thymocyte:mTEC contacts, the purging of self-reactive T cells in the thymic medulla is a remarkable achievement.

Subtle quantitative alterations in the thymic expression of TRAs can be consequential. Murine intrathymic expression levels of autoantigens including insulin and myelin antigens correlate inversely with susceptibility to autoimmune diseases, type I diabetes and experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE) respectively. Similarly, in humans genetic variants resulting in low levels of intrathymic insulin-expression are strongly associated with susceptibility to type I diabetes.

Qualitative variations in TRAs expressed in mTECs have also been associated with autoimmune disease models. Differential splicing or the expression of embryonic, rather than mature variants of myelin autoantigens have been associated with strain-specific susceptibility to EAE and may well play a role in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis in humans.

AIRE controls promiscuous expression of genes in the thymus

What enables mTECs to express a broad array of TRAs independently of spatial or developmental regulation? mTECs express the transcriptional regulator Aire (autoimmune regulator). Aire controls the expression of a large number of TRAs in mTECs (see Fig. 19.3).

Similarly, in humans, point mutations in the gene coding for Aire are the cause of the rare monogenic autosomal recessive autoimmune polyendocrinopathy–candidiasis–ectodermal dystrophy (APECED) syndrome. APECED is characterized by high titres of several different autoantibodies that cause disease, mainly in endocrine organs. Together these findings strongly suggest that the autoimmune manifestations are caused by diminished expression of TRAs in thymic mTECs due to the Aire deficiency. Aire associates with a large number of partners to form distinct complexes that impinge on different steps of transcription. The different functions of Aire’s partner proteins include chromatin structure and DNA-damage response, gene transcription, RNA processing, and nuclear transport. It is still unclear, however, how Aire controls promiscuous gene expression. Moreover, experimental evidence strongly suggests that additional yet unidentified transcriptional regulators must also be involved in promiscuous gene expression by mTECs.

Peripheral T-cell tolerance

Despite the intricate mechanisms of central tolerance induction in the thymus, approximately one third of the autoreactive clones are not deleted. Thus, a large number of low-avidity self-reactive T cells escapes into the periphery; thus, autoreactive T cells are part of the normal repertoire. For example, T cells that recognize insulin or myelin basic protein can be isolated from people without diabetes or multiple sclerosis. Despite their low avidity for self-antigen these cells are potentially dangerous and can cause autoimmune tissue destruction. Autoimmune diseases, however, are the exception rather than the norm. It follows that peripheral tolerance mechanisms must exist to prevent these autoreactive T cells from causing harm.

Immunological ignorance occurs if T cells do not encounter their cognate antigen

Immunological ignorance is maintained as long as autoreactive T-lymphocytes do not enter the tissue in which the autoantigen that they recognize is expressed. The autoreactive naive T cells are not tolerized and can be activated upon recognizing their cognate antigen.

The importance of immunological ignorance was demonstrated in mice that express a transgene-encoded TCR which recognizes a peptide derived from the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV). These mice were bred with another transgenic strain that expressed the viral peptide on the surface of their pancreatic islet cells. Surprisingly, diabetes did not develop in the offspring even though in vitro their T cells could kill cells that displayed the viral peptide (Fig. 19.4). The T cells in these double-transgenic mice were therefore, not tolerant in vivo, instead they were ignorant of their target cells.

When the mice were infected with LCMV, the transgenic T cells became activated, invaded the pancreas and destroyed the islet cells. Consequently the mice succumbed to diabetes. Importantly, LCMV-infection did not cause diabetes in those mice that expressed the transgenic TCR but not the LCMV-peptide in the pancreas. Once activated by LCMV infection, the hitherto ignorant autoreactive T cells (autoreactive because the LCMV-derived peptide was transgenically expressed in the pancreas) acquired the capacity to migrate into their target tissue where they recognized and destroyed the LCMV-peptide expressing islet cells (see Fig. 19.4).image

Some self antigens are sequestered in immunologically privileged tissues

Self-reactive T cell lines that recognize autoantigens including myelin antigens and pancreatic antigens can easily be cloned from healthy humans. How, then, is autoimmune disease avoided in the presence of potentially pathogenic autoreactive T cells?

One explanation is the sequestration of potentially harmful T cells from the tissues in which their target self-antigens are expressed. Sequestration can be achieved when antigens are physically separated from T cells (e.g. by the blood–brain barrier, see Chapter 12). The blood–brain barrier can be surmounted by activated lymphocytes, however, and many organs do not possess a physical barrier to prevent lymphocytes entering from the bloodstream. Instead, lymphocyte migration is controlled by chemokines, selectins and their receptors.

The amount of released self antigen critically affects sensitization

How does the immune system decide which autoreactive T cells may survive ignorantly and which need to be deleted? Antigen dose (Fig. 19.w1) and TCR avidity play a major role. One key experiment used two different strains of mice that expressed ovalbumin (OVA) specifically in the pancreas. One strain expressed OVA at low levels and the other expressed it at high levels. Only in the high-expressing strain was OVA presented to T cells in the draining lymph nodes, resulting in the deletion of adoptively transferred OVA-specific TC cells. In the low-expressing cells the OVA-specific T cells remained ignorant. Further in vitro assays revealed that the low-level OVA-expression was still sufficient to allow recognition and killing of the OVA-expressing pancreatic β cells by the OVA-specific CTL. Therefore, tissue restricted self-antigens need to be expressed at sufficiently high levels to be presented in the draining lymph nodes. These experiments also clearly showed that self-reactive T cells remain dangerous and poised to wreak havoc even if they are temporarily ignorant. In fact, destruction of pancreatic islet cells can induce the release of sufficient amounts of self-antigen to activate OVA-specific CTL in the OVA-low expressing mice.

Antigen presenting cells reinforce self tolerance

Dendritic cells can present antigen in a tolerogenic manner

Experiments designed to analyse CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses to antigens that were expressed in a tissue restricted manner (e.g. exclusively in the pancreas or the skin) revealed that self-Ag specific T cells accumulated in the draining lymph nodes as a result of reaction with self-antigen transported by DCs. Depending on the information received from the DC in addition to peptide presentation, the TH cells may become

The critical importance of DCs for the maintenance of tolerance has also been shown in experiments in which conditional DC depletion in mature mice resulted in spontaneous autoimmunity.

Functional maturation of DCs, characterized by strong expression of MHC and co-stimulatory molecules is induced by microbial or self-derived stimuli, which are sometimes called danger signals (Fig. 19.5). In the absence of such stimuli immature DCs express MHC and costimulatory molecules at low levels and antigen presentation induces T cell anergy or deletion depending upon the expression of high or low levels of self-antigen respectively (see Fig. 19.w1).image The signals that induce tolerogenic DC maturation as well as the tolerogenic interactions between DC and T cells are only incompletely understood. Still there are some clear candidates. Several molecules have already been identified that are necessary for tolerogenic DC:T cell interactions. These include surface molecules such as E-cadherin, PD-1 L, CD103, CD152 (CTLA-4) and ICOS-L (CD275) and cytokines, including IL-10 and TGF-β.

Tolerogenic DCs mature under steady-state conditions

DC maturation under steady-state conditions can be triggered by disrupting DC-DC adhesion which is mediated by E-cadherin. Similar to DC maturation induced by microbial products, the disruption of DC-DC contacts induces upregulation of MHC class II, co-stimulatory molecules and chemokine receptors and this process requires the activation of β-catenin. In contrast to DCs that have matured upon sensing microbial products, the DCs that have matured under steady-state conditions do not produce pro-inflammatory cytokines. Consequently, when they present antigen to naive TH cells these DCs induce regulatory T cells rather than effector T cells. Activation of the Wnt-β-catenin signaling pathway in DCs is required for the expression of interleukin-10, transforming growth factor-β and retinoic acid-metabolizing enzymes that are important for the induction of Treg differentiation and the suppression of effector T cells. Mice that lack β-catenin expression selectively in DC develop more severe inflammation in a mouse model of inflammatory bowel disease. It is likely that other, currently unknown triggers and signaling pathways are also relevant for steady-state DC maturation.

Moreover, DCs receive instructive signals from tissue cells. Epithelial cells, for example, produce a host of molecules capable of instructing DC development towards immunogenic or tolerogenic effector functions. At steady state conditions, the production of thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), IL-25, and IL-33 dominates and these cytokines favor tolerogenic DC development. Responding to tissue trauma, the epithelial cells switch to producing IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α, and type I interferons which strongly favor immunogenic DC maturation. Several additional triggers are known that induce DCs to become tolerogenic. These include the uptake of apoptotic cells and certain immunosuppressive cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β1 or substances such as prostaglandin E2 or the vitamin D3 1α,25-dihydroxy-metabolite.image

DC surface receptors involved in promoting tolerance

DCs can suppress T-cell responses by upregulating indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) which catabolizes tryptophan to kynurenines that are toxic to T cells. IDO-expression in DC can be induced by CD152 (CTLA-4), a co-inhibitory molecule that is constitutively expressed by regulatory T cells and binds CD80 and CD86 which are expressed by the DC.

Certain ligands for toll like receptors (TLR) expressed by dendritic cells can trigger tolerogenic DC development. This is exploited by several pathogens. For example the parasitic helminth Schistosoma mansoni produces lysophosphatidylserines that bind TLR2 to induce tolerogenic DCs which will help to induce regulatory T cells. Still, there is not one single switch for the induction of activating or tolerogenic DCs. Instead, DC fate decision requires the integration of a multitude of sometimes contradictory signals and more than one receptor is usually involved in dealing with microbial or self antigens. For example, targeting antigens in the absence of further DC-maturation stimuli to the endocytic receptor DEC-205 (CD205) on DCs has resulted in tolerance induction in vivo. The same targeting in combination with additional maturation stimuli for the DC has resulted in strong CD4, CD8 and humoral immune responses towards the antigen targeted to CD205. How exactly a DC is instructed to present antigen alongside stimulating or tolerogenic signals is still poorly understood at present. If one considers that during infections or other forms of tissue damage that trigger DC maturation both self-antigens and microbial antigens will be presented by the same dendritic cell it is difficult to understand how the activation of autoreactive T cells is avoided in these situations. Since the vast majority of people never develop autoimmune disease throughout their lifetime despite repeated infections, perhaps it is asking too much of dendritic cells to have the crucial decision whether a T cell response is initiated or curbed depend solely on the DCs’ maturation stage.

Regulatory T cells

Regulatory T cells (Treg) specialize in preventing and suppressing immune responses and are central for the prevention of autoimmune diseases. Usually, Tregs comprise approximately 10% of all CD4+ T cells. An inborn lack of Treg cells is the cause of severe autoimmune inflammation in patients suffering from the IPEX (immunodysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked) syndrome. Treg cells do not only limit autoimmune responses, they also dampen responses against microbial and viral antigens, allergens, tumors, and allografts, and protect fetuses (semi-allografts) during pregnancy.

Regulatory T cells suppress immune responses

Neonatal thymectomy in mice results in an autoimmune syndrome that affects a number of different organs including the thyroid, stomach, ovaries, and testes. Adoptive transfer of CD4+ T cells or CD4+CD8+ thymocytes from non-thymectomized syngeneic mice prevents autoimmune disease manifestations. These findings have three important implications:

It was, therefore, important to identify the CD4+ subset capable of suppressing autoimmune disease. Subsequent experiments revealed that adoptive transfer of CD4+ cells induced a range of autoimmune diseases in immunodeficient hosts provided that the transferred CD4+ cells had been purged of cells that coexpress CD25 (the IL-2 receptor alpha chain). Co-transfer of CD4+CD25+ cells prevented autoimmunity. Accordingly, these CD4+CD25+ cells were named regulatory T cells (Treg). Further experiments demonstrated that the majority of these cells constitute a distinct, thymus-derived lineage of CD4+ T cells. These thymus-derived Treg cells are usually called ‘natural Treg cells’.

Since the seminal report of these findings numerous reports have confirmed that Tregs suppress immune responses against both self and non-self antigens in vivo and in vitro. When cultured in vitro Tregs do not proliferate and do not produce effector cytokines such as IL-2, TNF-α, IFNγ, or IL-4 upon stimulation via their TCR. This anergic state is not overcome by co-stimulatory signals.

When co-cultured with CD25 effector cells in vitro, Treg can suppress the proliferation of the effector cells. To be able to suppress, Tregs need to be stimulated via their TCR.

In addition to Treg cells, various other cell types can help to suppress immune responses by distinct effector mechanisms. Moreover, not all CD4+CD25+ T cells are Tregs.

Therefore, Tregs cannot be discriminated from activated TH effector cells based on the expression of CD25 alone.

Defects in FoxP3 result in multi-system autoimmune diseases

Since the discovery of FoxP3 a multitude of studies in animal models of autoimmunity proved that a deficiency in CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Treg can accelerate the development or increase the severity of autoimmune disease. Conversely, in some models, disease could be prevented or even reversed through adoptive transfer of Treg.

Similarly, Treg isolated from human peripheral blood can suppress T cell proliferation and cytokine production in vitro. The human counterpart of the scurfy mutation is the IPEX (immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked) syndrome mentioned above, which is caused by defects in FoxP3 expression resulting in a lack of Treg and has similar clinical manifestations to those observed in scurfy mice. IPEX patients suffer from autoimmune diseases, most prominently autoimmune diabetes (type I diabetes, T1D), thyroiditis, hemolytic anemia, and inflammatory bowel disease and allergic manifestations such as eczema. More than 90% of IPEX patients die from autoimmune diabetes at an early age. This demonstrates that (almost) all individuals harbor potentially diabetogenic autoreactive T cells in their peripheral repertoire. Usually, in healthy people, these autoreactive T cells are controlled by Tregs.

In contrast to murine T cells, human T cells express FoxP3 readily and transiently upon TCR signaling. Most of these cells do not possess immunosuppressive capacities. Thus, FoxP3 expression is not a reliable marker for human Treg cells. In fact, the stability of FoxP3-expression in natural Tregs is currently still a matter of debate.

Natural Treg cells differentiate in the thymus

During thymic development FoxP3 expression starts in CD4+CD8+ double positive thymocytes. Approximately 5% of the more mature CD4+CD8 single positive thymocytes express FoxP3. These Treg cells which acquire their phenotype and functional capacities in the thymus and are released into the periphery as CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ T cells, are called natural Treg cells or nTregs (Fig. 19.6).

The number of FoxP3+ thymocytes is drastically reduced in mice that lack MHC class I or II expression. Thus, the nTregs must be subject to positive and negative selection based on the recognition of self-peptide/MHC complexes presented by thymic APCs. Thus, the same cell types that mediate negative selection are also relevant for Treg generation. How, then, are nTregs selected during thymic development? TCR repertoire analyses do not support the notion that the Treg repertoire was skewed towards self-reactivity. Current evidence rather suggests that high affinity interactions of the TCR with self-peptide/MHC complexes in the thymus favors the recruitment of thymocytes into the Treg lineage.image

iTreg cells differentiate in the periphery

In addition to the natural Tregs which differentiate in the thymus, mature T cells outside the thymus can also acquire Treg phenotype and function. These are called induced Treg cells (iTregs) (see Fig. 19.6). FoxP3 expression can be induced in naive CD4+ cells in vitro by antigen recognition in the presence of TGF-β. There is a close developmental relationship between iTregs and TH17 cells. Antigen recognition in the presence of TGF-β induces FoxP3 expression if IL-6 is not present. In contrast, antigen recognition in the presence of TGF-β and IL-6 prevents FoxP3 expression, induces expression of the retinoic acid receptor (RAR) related orphan nuclear receptor RORγt expression and therefore, TH17 differentiation. The transcription factor IRF4 is necessary for the down-regulation of TGF-β-induced FoxP3 expression in response to IL-6 (Fig. 19.7).

Chronic antigen stimulation, particularly with suboptimal doses, in vivo also induces FoxP3 expression and iTreg differentiation.

Methylation of the FoxP3 gene is less widespread in iTreg than in natural Treg cells. Consequently, iTreg differentiation is less stable and it is possible that iTregs lose their regulatory capacities and acquire alternative effector functions in vivo. In contrast to murine T cells, induction of FoxP3 by TGF-β does not induce regulatory capacities in human T cells.image

The phenotype of Treg cells

Many different cell types can produce immunosuppressive cytokines or participate otherwise in immunosuppression in vivo. This includes TH1, TH2, and TH17 cells all of which can produce the immunosuppressive cytokine IL-10. It is therefore, important to distinguish between Treg cells and other T cells that may, temporarily or permanently be able to suppress immune responses. Several molecules are expressed preferentially, if not exclusively by Treg cells, but defining a reliable surface phenotype of Treg cells has been an elusive goal. Complicating the issue is the fact that human and murine Treg cells differ phenotypically. According to the current definition Treg cells are CD3+TCR+CD4+ T cells. There are reports of immunosuppression by CD8+ T cells. Although these warrant further investigation, these cells would currently not be considered classical Treg cells.

Treg cells express high levels of CD25, which is the IL-2R α chain. Upon activation, T cells up-regulate their expression of CD25 and, therefore, the expression of CD25 is not an exclusive property of Treg cells, particularly during ongoing immune responses. Human Treg cells usually express the IL-7 receptor CD127 at very low levels. Therefore, the CD4+CD25hiCD127lo population is highly enriched for Tregs.

The transcription factor FoxP3 is necessary and sufficient to induce Treg phenotype and function in mice. In humans FoxP3 expression is necessary but not sufficient for Treg function. Human effector T cells can transiently express FoxP3 upon activation without acquiring immunoregulatory capacities. The FoxP3 locus is extensively demethylated in nTregs but not in effector T cells that express FoxP3 transiently. In mice, Tregs are usually characterized as CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ T cells.

Tregs express CD152 (CTLA4) constitutively.

A number of molecules, including CD45RA or the chemokine receptor CCR6 are differentially expressed in Tregs depending on their activation status and effector functions. It has become clear that there are functionally different subpopulations of Treg cells.

The immunomodulatory glucocorticoid-induced TNFR-related protein (GITR) is also preferentially expressed by Tregs. GITR-expression is functionally relevant for Tregs since it supports Treg proliferation in the presence of IL-2.

Treg effector functions

Treg effector functions can be analyzed in vivo either by depletion or transfer of Treg cells or in vitro. When cultured in vitro, Tregs proliferate poorly upon stimulation via their TCR unless IL-2 is also added to the culture. Nevertheless, Treg proliferation can be demonstrated in vivo. Tregs need stimulation via their TCR to exert their immunosuppressive functions. Once activated, Treg cells suppress immune responses independent of their own antigen-specificity. This antigen-nonspecific immunosuppression has been called bystander suppression. Another characteristic of Treg action has long been known as infectious tolerance. The concept of infectious tolerance is based on in vivo transfer studies in which the adoptive transfer of Tregs induced the differentiation or selective outgrowth of Tregs in the host. These endogenous Tregs would maintain tolerance even after the transferred Tregs were no longer detectable in the host.

Tregs can act on a number of different target cells including effector T cells and dendritic cells but also on numerous other cell types including B cells, macrophages, NK cells, NKT cells, mast cells, osteoblasts and osteoclasts. They produce or consume cytokines to modulate their target cells and Tregs are also capable of lysing target cells (Fig. 19.8).image

Tregs secrete immunosuppressive cytokines

One possible mechanism of immunosuppression by Tregs would be the secretion of immunosuppressive cytokines (see Fig. 19.8). Indeed, three inhibitory cytokines, IL-10, TGF-β, and IL-35 are produced by Tregs and important for Treg development or effector function. Importantly, IL-10 and TGF-β are not exclusively produced by Tregs but can be produced by many different cell types. Moreover, most in vitro studies found IL-10 or TGF-β produced by Treg non-essential for Treg mediated suppression.

IL-10 is a potent suppressor of macrophage and T cell effector functions and critically important to dampen immune responses. Many cell types including TH2 and TH17 cells normally produce IL-10, and some TH1 cells start to produce it following chronic antigen stimulation. Therefore, the production of IL-10 by Treg is not critically required in many experimental settings. Mice that lack IL-10 expression specifically in Treg do not develop autoimmune disease manifestations spontaneously. Nevertheless, experimentally induced airway hypersensitivity is more severe in these mice than in their wild type littermates and Treg produced IL-10 seems to be most critical for the control of mucosal immune responses to environmental stimuli. The importance of Treg produced IL-10 seems to depend on the triggers and localization of the immune response.

TGF-β has immunosuppressive functions and is critically required for the differentiation of precursors into Treg cells in vivo and in vitro. TGF-β is also necessary to maintain FoxP3 expression of nTreg cells and thus for Treg cell homeostasis. In contrast, the relevance of Treg cell produced TGF-β as a mediator of Treg effector function in vivo remains unproven. In one particularly instructive experimental system Treg from TGF-β1-deficient mice were able to inhibit colonic inflammation that was induced by adoptive transfer of FoxP3-negative T cells. Importantly, administration of an anti-TGF-β mAb abrogated suppression of colitis mediated by TGF-β1-deficient Treg. These results show that TGF-β is absolutely required for suppression of colitis, but does not need to be produced by Tregs.

IL-35 is a heterodimeric member of the IL-12 family. It consists of an Ebi3 (Epstein–Barr virus-induced gene 3) subunit and p35, which is also known as IL-12. In mice IL-35 is selectively expressed by Treg and required for their optimal effector function.

The relevance of IL-35 for human Treg effector functions is less clear. Many different human cell types express p35. Resting human Tregs do not express Ebi3. Together, these findings make it unlikely that IL-35 is relevant for human Treg. However, IL-35 can induce naive human CD4+ T cells to produce IL-35 and acquire immunosuppressive capacities without expressing FoxP3.

Tregs also secrete other immunosuppressive soluble mediators, including galectin 10, that may be important for Treg effector functions.

Modulation of DC maturation and function

Some of the in vitro experiments to assess the suppressive function of Tregs are performed by stimulating the responder T cells with plate-bound antibodies in the absence of antigen presenting cells. Data from such experiments indicate that Tregs can act directly on responder T cells. In vivo, however, the modulation of DC/T interactions is also an important mechanism of Treg-mediated immunosuppression. Depletion of Treg cells in vivo results in increased DC maturation and elevated numbers of DC. Direct interactions between Treg cells and DCs have also been observed by intravital microscopy. During these interactions Treg cells can exert different effects on DC.

Direct cytolysis. In vivo studies have shown that Treg cells can induce the death of antigen-presenting DCs in lymph nodes in a perforin-dependent manner. This depletion of DCs limited the onset of CD8+ T cell responses.

Treg cells can also modulate maturation and function of DCs and can probably also modulate the function of mononuclear phagocytes. In vitro, Treg cells can downregulate the expression of co-stimulatory molecules, including CD80 and CD86 by DC. By averting co-stimulatory interactions between DC and effector T cells the Treg cells can efficiently inhibit T-cell priming. CD152 (CTLA4) which is expressed constitutively by Treg cells plays an important role in reducing the DCs costimulatory capacity.

The effects of Treg cells on DC are severely reduced when blocking antibodies against CD152 are added or CD152-deficient Treg cells are used in these assays. Moreover, mice that lack CD152 expression selectively in Treg cells spontaneously develop systemic autoimmune disease. This latter finding clearly illustrates that CD152 is pivotal for Treg effector functions.

Treg cells can induce DCs to express indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), which depletes tryptophan resulting in the suppression of effector T cell responses. This interaction also depends on the interaction between CD152 and CD80/86 (see Fig. 19.8).

This list of Treg cell effector mechanisms is by no means complete. Many more molecules and cellular interactions have been identified that may be important for Treg effector function. Clearly there is not one dominant molecular or cellular interaction by which Tregs exert their effector functions. Instead, Treg cells use different effector functions to prevent or suppress different innate or adaptive immune responses triggered by different stimuli at different anatomical locations. With few exceptions, the dramatic phenotype seen in scurfy mice or IPEX patients who lack FoxP3 does not develop when just one of the pathways mentioned in this section is absent. One such exception is the lack of CD152 which causes widespread lymphocytic infiltration of multiple organs. Moreover, IL-10 deficiency and the IL-2 deficiency syndrome, which cause a similar dramatic phenotype, are not solely attributable to disturbed Treg function.

Can loss of Treg function explain autoimmune disease?

Several pathological mechanisms have been proposed to explain why autoimmunity occurs despite the presence of Tregs. Could Tregs, despite being present in normal or even enhanced numbers have lost (some of) their effector functions? There is some evidence that Tregs can lose their function or that effector T cells become resistant to their action.image

Loss of FoxP3-expression has been observed in several experimental systems. Diminished expression of FoxP3 resulted not only in reduced suppressive capacities of such ‘ex-Tregs’ in some cases these cells also acquired effector functions. Given that Tregs are frequently self-reactive such conversion could significantly contribute to the development of autoimmune diseases. Since the majority of these experiments have been performed in vitro, in genetically altered mice or in lymphopenic mice the relevance of Treg conversion into effector cells is currently unclear.

Alternatively, the effector T cells could become resistant against Treg-mediated suppression. Experimental evidence comes from mice deficient for Cbl-B, TRAF6 or NFAT1 and NFAT4. T cells from these mice cannot become anergic and they are also resistant to Treg-mediated suppression. Memory T cells, which have lower requirements for co-stimulation, are more difficult to influence by Tregs than naive TH cells. Certain TNF-family members such as OX40 and 4-1BB and several cytokines, including the gamma-chain cytokines IL-2, -4, -7 and -15 can contribute to resistance of effector T cells against suppression by Tregs.

However, except for the IPEX syndrome (Fig. 19.9), in which FoxP3+ Tregs are completely absent, there is currently no convincing evidence that reduced numbers of Tregs would cause autoimmune disease. In contrast, Tregs are frequently found in increased numbers at the site of autoimmune lesions.

T cell anergy

T cells that cannot be completely activated upon recognition of their cognate antigen are called anergic. The phenomenon of T cell clonal anergy was discovered in CD4+ TH1 clones that failed to produce IL-2 and proliferate when stimulated in vitro with antigen in the absence of co-stimulatory signals. In such clones the anergic state may be maintained for several weeks. Characteristically, full effector functions can be rescued in anergic T cell clones by in vitro exposure to IL-2.

T cells with diminished proliferation and cytokine production can also be isolated ex vivo, e.g. after non-immunogenic peptide application, exposure to superantigens or prolonged exposure to antigen. This phenomenon is sometimes called adaptive tolerance. T cell clonal anergy induced in vitro differs from T cell anergy, or adoptive tolerance, in vivo. Nevertheless, some of the major molecular pathways leading to anergy seem to be similar in vitro and in vivo. Mice deficient for molecules known to be important for anergy induction in vitro are resistant towards the induction of T cell anergy in vivo.

One plausible explanation for the functional and molecular differences between clonal T cell anergy in vitro and in vivo is that several different pathways can induce and enforce T cell clonal anergy. To date, there are no surface marker(s) that would allow the reliable identification of anergic T cells.

T cells can be deleted in the periphery

T cells that have survived thymic selection can still be deleted in the periphery. When TCR transgenic T cells are adoptively transferred into recipient mice that express the antigen recognized by the transgenic TCR, the transferred T cells will undergo apoptosis in the recipient mice. The transferred T cells survive if they lack the pro-apoptotic protein Bim (Bcl2 interacting mediator of cell death) or if they over-express the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl2 (Bim antagonizes Bcl2). Peripheral deletion not only enforces self-tolerance, it is also helps maintain lymphocyte homeostasis throughout life. At the height of the immune response against certain viruses, almost half of all CD8+ T cells in the blood of the infected patients can be specific for one dominant virus-derived peptide. The majority of these cells must be removed once the virus has been cleared.

Cytokine withdrawal can induce apoptosis

One mechanism of peripheral deletion results from the lack of growth factors, particularly IL-2, for which all activated T cells compete. Cytokine withdrawal triggers an intrinsic pathway of apoptosis involving activation of the Bim factor. Regulatory T cells can accelerate or induce cytokine-withdrawal induced apoptosis of effector T cells by consuming IL-2.

IL-2 is not only critically important for the proliferation and differentiation of naive T cells. When effector T-cells are re-stimulated with large amounts of antigen, the addition of IL-2 induces apoptosis in the cycling T cells. This form of peripheral deletion has been called activation induced cell death (AICD) or restimulation induced cell death (RICD). Mice that are deficient in IL-2 or IL-2 signaling develop an autoimmune syndrome characterized by an abundance of activated T lymphocytes, multiple autoantibodies and lymphocytic infiltration of several organs. Restimulation induced cell death is one explanation for the observation that the administration of high doses of antigen can induce tolerance. This phenomenon has been called high dose tolerance.

Thus, IL-2 has contradictory effects at different phases of the T-cell response. During priming IL-2 is critically required to support clonal expansion and differentiation and a lack of IL-2 at that stage will induce apoptosis. When already activated, an effector T cell simultaneously encountering high concentrations of antigen and IL-2, will undergo apoptosis. Therefore, IL-2 both initiates and terminates T-cell responses.

B cell tolerance

B lymphocytes and plasma cells that produce antibodies that recognize self-antigens, so called auto-antibodies, pose a threat to the organism. Grave’s disease, which is clinically characterized by overshooting production of thyroid hormones, is caused by autoantibodies that act as agonists for the receptor for thyroid stimulating hormone. Blistering skin diseases are caused by autoantibodies that recognize adhesion molecules in the epidermis. In addition to such organ-specific diseases autoantibodies can cause systemic autoimmunity as exemplified by the multi-organ autoimmune disease systemic lupus erythematosus (see Chapter 20).

Autoreactive receptors can be generated in this process and indeed a large percentage of immature B cells have been demonstrated to be autoreactive, creating a demand for immunological pathways that ensure tolerance induction and maintenance in B cells. How B cell tolerance is achieved and maintained differs in several important ways from the immunological pathways to T cell tolerance:

Altogether, less than 10% of the mature follicular B cells have been found to be autoreactive. B cell tolerance to autoantigens is established by clonal deletion, receptor editing, the induction of anergy, and the B cells’ dependence on T cell help (Fig. 19.10).

B cells undergo negative selection in the bone marrow

Clonal deletion of B lymphocytes was first directly demonstrated in mice that expressed a transgenic BCR specific for a foreign antigen (hen egg lysosyme, HEL). These mice were bred with another strain of transgenic mice that expressed HEL. The F1 mice expressed both HEL and BCRs that recognized HEL. The HEL-specific B-cells were deleted (negatively selected) in the bone marrow of the F1 mice (see Fig. 19.10(1)). When HEL-specific mature B cells from mice that did not express the HEL-transgene were adoptively transferred into mice that expressed HEL, these B cells were also deleted in the recipient mice. Apoptosis of mature germinal centre B cells occurs rapidly, within 4–8 hours of encountering the self-antigen. When the BCR transgenic mice were also Bim-deficient, they survived in the recipient mice. Similar to T cells, the pro-apoptotic factor Bim is important for BCR-induced apoptosis. This is further illustrated by the fact that Bim-deficient mice spontaneously produce autoantibodies against DNA.

B cell anergy can be induced by self antigens

B cells can also become anergic upon recognizing a tolerizing self-antigen (see Fig. 19.10(3)). Anergic B cells lack the capacity to proliferate and produce antibodies in response to BCR signaling. In anergic B cells signaling via the BCR is uncoupled from NFκB, thus preventing B cell proliferation. At the same time BCR signaling still prevents apoptosis. Similar to other immature and naive B cells, anergic B cells have a very limited life span if they do not receive appropriate signals. The anergic state can be reversed if the B cell receives signaling via the BCR simultaneously with synergistic signals from another receptor. Such simultaneous signaling is likely to occur when the B cell encounters microbial rather than self antigens. One example is signaling both via the BCR and toll like receptors (TLRs). This would typically be the case when a B cell encounters a pathogen, e.g. gram-negative bacteria possessing LPS which triggers signaling via TLR4.

Another rescue pathway for anergic B cells is activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3 kinase). Again, this would typically occur when the B cell encounters microbial antigens which are tagged with C3d, a cleavage product of the complement component C3.

The dual signaling results in the activation of PI3 kinase and rescues the B cell from the anergic state.

B cell tolerance due to lack of T cell help

Perhaps the main mechanism to ensure B cell tolerance is the B cells’ dependence on T cell help for high affinity isotype switched antibody production (see Fig. 19.10(4)). BCR signaling results in changes in gene expression that facilitate antigen presentation to T cells:

In vivo imaging studies have shown the formation of conjugates between T and B cells at the border between the follicle and the T-cell zone. Each of these contacts lasts for approximately 10–40 min and the B cells spend about 1.5 days in this perifollicular area. A T cell subset, the T follicular helper (TFH) cells express the chemokine receptors CXCR5 that enables them to migrate towards the B cell follicles. It also produces cytokines such as IL-4 and IL-21 that support B cell differentiation into antibody-secreting cells and it has the costimulatory receptor ICOS that enhances interactions with ICOSL+ B cells. Dysregulation of TFH development or function has been associated with autoimmunity. For example, mice with a mutation of the TFH regulatory protein Roquin have massively increased TFH numbers in their germinal centres and develop pathogenic autoantibodies.

The survival of germinal centre (GC) B cells also depends on repeated interactions between CD40 on B cells and its ligand CD154 on T cells. Injection of a blocking mAb against CD154 results in the dissolution of germinal centres within several days. To survive and differentiate into antibody producing cells, naive B cells need to receive two signals:

Only those B cells that present antigen which is recognized by a TH cell will receive anti-apoptotic signals from that T cell. Since the T cell repertoire has been largely purged of self-reactive receptors, a B cell recognizing and presenting a microbial antigen is much more likely to receive T cell help than a B cell that recognizes a self-antigen. Thus, both T- and B-cell tolerance must be overcome before high affinity autoantibodies can be produced.

Further reading