Immunization Practices

Published on 27/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Pediatrics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1422 times

Chapter 165 Immunization Practices

Immunization is one of the most beneficial and cost-effective disease-prevention measures. As a result of effective and safe vaccines, smallpox has been eradicated, polio is close to worldwide eradication, and measles and rubella are no longer endemic in the USA. The incidence of most other vaccine-preventable diseases of childhood has been reduced by ≥99% from the annual morbidity prior to development of the corresponding vaccine (Table 165-1). An analysis of effective prevention measures recommended for widespread use by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reported that childhood immunization received a perfect score, based on clinically preventable disease burden and cost-effectiveness.

Immunization is the process of inducing immunity against a specific disease. Immunity can be induced either passively through administration of antibody-containing preparations or actively by administering a vaccine or toxoid to stimulate the immune system to produce a prolonged humoral and/or cellular immune response. As of 2011, infants, children, and adolescents routinely are vaccinated against 16 diseases in the USA: diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) disease, hepatitis A (HepA), hepatitis B (HepB), measles, mumps, rubella, rotavirus, varicella, pneumococcal disease, meningococcal disease, and influenza. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine has been recommended routinely for girls 11-12 yr of age, with catch-up for females through 26 yr of age. One of the HPV vaccines, HPV4, is recommended for permissive use in males age 11 through 18 yr for prevention of genital warts.

Passive Immunity

Passive immunity is achieved by administration of preformed antibodies to induce transient protection against an infectious agent. Products used include immunoglobulin (IG) administered intramuscularly (IM); specific or hyperimmune IG preparations administered IM; intravenous IG (IVIG); specific or hyper-immunoglobulin preparations administered IV; antibodies of animal origin; monoclonal antibodies; and subcutaneous (SC) human IG, which has been licensed to treat patients with primary immunodeficiencies. Passive immunity also can be induced naturally through transplacental transfer of maternal antibodies (IgG) during gestation. Maternally derived transplacental antibodies can provide protection during an infant’s first month of life and longer during breast-feeding. Protection for some diseases can persist for as long as a year after birth.

The major indications for passive immunity are to provide protection to immunodeficient children with B-lymphocyte defects who have difficulties making antibodies, persons exposed to infectious diseases or who are at imminent risk of exposure where there is not adequate time for them to develop an active immune response to a vaccine, and persons with an infectious disease as part of specific therapy for that disease (Table 165-2).

Table 165-2 IMMUNE GLOBULIN AND ANIMAL ANTISERA PREPARATIONS

PRODUCT MAJOR INDICATIONS
Immune globulin for intramuscular injection Replacement therapy in primary immunodeficiency disorders
Hepatitis A prophylaxis
Measles prophylaxis
Intravenous mmunoglobulin (IVIG) Replacement therapy in primary immune-deficiency disorders
Kawasaki disease
Immune-mediated thrombocytopenia
Pediatric HIV infection
Hypogammaglobulinemia in chronic B-cell lymphocytic leukemia
Hematopoietic cell transplantation in adults to prevent graft-versus host disease and infection
May be useful in a variety of other conditions
Hepatitis B immune globulin (IM) Postexposure prophylaxis
Prevention of perinatal infection in infants born to HBsAg+ mothers
Rabies immune globulin (IM) Postexposure prophylaxis
Tetanus immune globulin (IM) Wound prophylaxis
Treatment of tetanus
Varicella-zoster immune globulin (VZIG) (IM) or IVIG Postexposure prophylaxis of susceptible people at high risk for complications from varicella
Cytomegalovirus IVIG Prophylaxis of disease in seronegative transplant recipients
Palivizumab (monoclonal antibody) (IM) Prophylaxis for infants against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (Chapter 252)
Vaccinia immune globulin (IV) Prevent or modify serious adverse events following smallpox vaccination due to vaccinia replication
Botulism IVIG human Treatment of infant botulism
Diphtheria antitoxin, equine Treatment of diphtheria
Trivalent botulinum (A,B,E) and bivalent (A,B) botulinum antitoxin, equine Treatment of food and wound botulism

From Passive immunization. In Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Kimberlin DW, et al, editors: Red book 2006: report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, ed 28, Elk Grove Village, IL, 2009, American Academy of Pediatrics.

Intramuscular Immunoglobulin

IG is a sterile antibody-containing solution, usually derived through cold ethanol fractionation of large pools of human plasma from adults. Antibody concentrations reflect the infectious disease exposure and immunization experience of plasma donors. IG contains 15-18% protein, is predominantly IgG, and is administered intramuscularly. Intravenous use of human intramuscular IG is contraindicated. IG is not known to transmit infectious agents, including viral hepatitis and HIV. The major indications for IG are replacement therapy for children with antibody deficiency disorders, and for passive immunization for measles and hepatitis A.

For replacement therapy, the usual dose of IG is 100 mg/kg or 0.66 mL/kg monthly. The usual interval between doses is 2-4 wk depending on trough IgG concentrations. In practice, IVIG has replaced IMIG for this indication. IG can be used to prevent or modify measles if administered to susceptible children within 6 days of exposure (usual dose, 0.25 mL/kg for immunocompetent children, 0.5 mL/kg for immunocompromised children; maximum dose 15 mL) and to prevent or modify HepA if administered to children within 14 days of exposure (usual dose, 0.02 mL/kg). IG also may be administered for prophylaxis of HepA for persons traveling internationally to HepA-endemic areas (0.06 mL/kg) and for children too young for HepA vaccination (<1 yr of age). In children <12 mo of age, adults >40 yr of age, and susceptible children and adults with underlying immunodeficiencies or chronic liver disease, IG is preferred over hepatitis A immunization. In people 12 mo-40 yr of age, HepA immunization is preferred over IG for postexposure prophylaxis and for protection of people traveling to areas where HepA is endemic.

The most common adverse reaction to IG is pain and discomfort at the injection site and, less commonly, flushing, headache, chills, and nausea. More-serious adverse events are rare and have included chest pain, dyspnea, anaphylaxis, and systemic collapse. Patients with selective IgA deficiency can produce antibodies against the trace amounts of IgA in IG preparations and develop reactions after repeat doses. These reactions can include fever, chills, and a shocklike syndrome. Because these reactions are rare, testing for selective IgA deficiencies is not recommended.

Monoclonal Antibodies

Monoclonal antibodies are antibody preparations produced against a single antigen. They are mass-produced from a hybridoma, created by fusing an antibody-producing B cell with a fast-growing immortal cell such as a cancer cell. A major monoclonal antibody used in infectious diseases is palivizumab, which can prevent severe disease from respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) among children ≤24 mo of age with chronic lung disease (CLD, also called bronchopulmonary dysplasia), with a history of premature birth or with congenital heart lesions or with neuromuscular diseases. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has developed specific recommendations for use of palivizumab (Chapter 252). RSV-IVIG, a hyperimmune globulin formulated for intravenous administration, is no longer produced in the USA. Monoclonal antibodies also are used to prevent transplant rejection and to treat some types of cancer and autoimmune diseases. Monoclonal antibodies against interleukin 2 (IL-2) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) are being used as part of the therapeutic approach to patients with a variety of malignant and autoimmune diseases.

Serious adverse events associated with palivizumab primarily are rare cases of anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity reactions. Adverse reactions to monoclonal antibodies directed at modifying the immune response, such as antibodies against IL-2 or TNF, can be more serious, such as cytokine release syndrome, fever, chills, tremors, chest pain, immunosuppression, and infection with various organisms, including mycobacteria.

Active Immunization

Vaccines are defined as whole or parts of microorganisms administered to prevent an infectious disease. Vaccines can consist of whole inactivated microorganisms (e.g., polio and HepA), parts of the organism (e.g., acellular pertussis, HPV, and HepB), polysaccharide capsules (e.g., pneumococcal and meningococcal polysaccharide vaccines), polysaccharide capsules conjugated to protein carriers (e.g., Hib, pneumococcal, and meningococcal conjugate vaccines), live-attenuated microorganisms (measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, rotavirus, and live-attenuated influenza vaccines), and toxoids (tetanus and diphtheria) (Table 165-3). A toxoid is a modified bacterial toxin that is made nontoxic but is still able to induce an active immune response against the toxin.

Table 165-3 CURRENTLY AVAILABLE VACCINES IN THE USA BY TYPE

PRODUCT TYPE
Anthrax vaccine adsorbed Cell free filtrate of components including protective antigen
Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine Live-attenuated mycobacterial strain used prevent tuberculosis in very limited circumstances
Diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine Toxoids of diphtheria and tetanus and purified and detoxified components from Bordetella pertussis
DTaP with Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTaP/Hib) DTaP and Hib polysaccharide conjugated to tetanus toxoid
DTaP–hepatitis B–inactivated polio vaccine (DTaP-HepB-IPV) DTaP with hepatitis B surface antigen produced through recombinant techniques in yeast with inactivated whole polioviruses
DTaP with IPV and Hib (DTaP-IPV/Hib) DTaP with inactivated whole polio viruses and Hib polysaccharide conjugated to tetanus toxoid
DTaP and inactivated polio vaccine (DTaP-IPV) DTaP with inactivated whole polio viruses
Hib conjugate vaccine (Hib) Polysaccharide conjugated to either tetanus toxoid or meningococcal group B outer membrane protein
Hepatitis A vaccine (HepA) Inactivated whole virus
Hepatitis A-hepatitis B vaccine (HepA-HepB) Combined hepatitis A and B vaccine
Hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) HBsAg produced through recombinant techniques in yeast
Hepatitis B-Hib vaccine (Hib-HepB) Combined hepatitis B–Hib vaccine; the Hib component is polysaccharide conjugated to meningococcal group B outer membrane protein
Human papillomavirus vaccine (bivalent) (HPV2) and (quadrivalent) (HPV4) The L1 capsid proteins of HPV types 6, 11, 16, 18 and to prevent cervical cancer and genital warts (HPV4) and types 16 and 18 to prevent cervical cancer (HPV2)
Influenza virus vaccine inactivated (TIV) Trivalent (A/H3N2, A/H1N1, and B) split and purified inactivated vaccine containing the hemagglutinin (H) and neuraminidase (N) of each type and other components
Influenza virus vaccine live, intranasal (LAIV) Live-attenuated, temperature-sensitive, cold-adapted trivalent vaccine containing the H and N genes from the wild strains reassorted to have the 6 other genes from the cold-adapted parent
Japanese encephalitis vaccine Inactivated whole virus that is purified
Measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine Live-attenuated viruses
Measles, mumps, rubella, varicella (MMRV) vaccine Live-attenuated viruses
Meningococcal conjugate vaccine against serogroups A, C, W135, and Y (MCV4) Polysaccharide from each serogroup conjugated to diphtheria toxoid or CRM 197
Meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine against serogroups A, C, W135, and Y (MPSV4) Polysaccharides from each of the serogroups
Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (13 valent) (PCV13) Pneumococcal polysaccharides conjugated to a nontoxic form of diphtheria toxin CRM197
Contains 13 serotypes that accounted for >80% of invasive disease in young children prior to vaccine licensure.
Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (23 valent) (PPSV23) Pneumococcal polysaccharides of 23 serotypes responsible for 85-90% of bacteremic disease in the USA
Poliomyelitis (inactivated, enhanced potency) (IPV) Inactivated whole virus
Rabies vaccines (human diploid and purified chick embryo cell) Inactivated whole virus
Rotavirus vaccines (RV5 and RV1) Bovine rotavirus pentavalent vaccine (RV-5) live reassortment attenuated virus, and human live-attenuated virus (RV1)
Smallpox vaccine Vaccinia virus, an attenuated pox virus that provides cross-protection against smallpox
Tetanus and diphtheria toxoids, adsorbed (Td, adult use) Tetanus toxoid plus a reduced quantity of diphtheria toxoid compared to diphtheria toxoid used for children <7 yr of age
Tetanus and diphtheria toxoids adsorbed plus acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine Tetanus toxoid plus a reduced quantity of diphtheria toxoid plus acellular pertussis vaccine to be used in adolescents and adults and in children 7 through 9 yr of age who have not been appropriately immunized with DTaP
Typhoid vaccine (polysaccharide) Vi capsular polysaccharide of Salmonella typhi
Typhoid vaccine (oral) Live-attenuated Ty21a strain of Salmonella typhi
Varicella vaccine Live-attenuated Oka strain
Yellow fever vaccine Live-attenuated 17D strain

Data from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: U.S. vaccine names (website). www.cdc.gov/vaccines/about/terms/USvaccines.html. Accessed March 4, 2011.

Immunizing agents can contain a variety of other constituents besides the immunizing antigen. Suspending fluids may be sterile water or saline but could be a complex fluid containing small amounts of proteins or other constituents derived from the biologic system used to grow the immunobiologic. Preservatives, stabilizers, and antimicrobial agents are used to inhibit bacterial growth and to prevent degradation of the antigen. Such components can include gelatin, 2-phenoxyethanol, and specific antimicrobial agents. Preservatives are added to multidose vials of vaccines, primarily to prevent bacterial contamination on repeated entry of the vial. In the past, many vaccines for children contained thimerosal, a preservative containing ethyl mercury. Beginning in 1999, removal of thimerosal as a preservative from vaccines for children was begun as a precautionary measure in the absence of any data on harm from the preservative. This objective was accomplished by switching to single-dose packaging. The only vaccines in the recommended schedule for young children that contain thimerosal as a preservative are some preparations of influenza vaccine. Adjuvants are used in some vaccines to enhance the immune response. In the USA, the only adjuvants currently licensed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be part of vaccines are aluminum salts and ASO4, an adjuvant that contains aluminum hydroxide and monophosphoryl lipid A. Vaccines with adjuvants should be injected deep into muscle masses to avoid local irritation, granuloma formation, and necrosis associated with SC or intracutaneous administration.

Vaccines can induce immunity by stimulating antibody formation, cellular immunity, or both. Protection induced by most vaccines is thought to be mediated primarily by B lymphocytes, which produce antibody. Such antibodies can inactivate toxins, neutralize viruses, and prevent their attachment to cellular receptors, facilitate phagocytosis and killing of bacteria, interact with complement to lyse bacteria, and prevent adhesion to mucosal surfaces by interacting with the bacterial cell surface.

Most B-lymphocyte responses require the assistance of CD4 helper T lymphocytes. These T lymphocyte–dependent responses tend to induce high levels of functional antibody with high avidity, mature over time from primarily an IgM response to long-term persistent IgG, and induce immunologic memory that leads to enhanced responses upon boosting. T lymphocyte–dependent vaccines, which include protein moieties, induce good immune responses even in young infants. In contrast, polysaccharide antigens induce B-lymphocyte responses in the absence of T-lymphocyte help. These T lymphocyte–independent vaccines are associated with poor immune responses in children <2 yr of age, short-term immunity, and absence of an enhanced or booster response on repeat exposure to the antigen. To overcome problems of plain polysaccharide vaccines, polysaccharides have been conjugated, or covalently linked, to protein carriers, converting the vaccine to a T lymphocyte–dependent vaccine. In contrast to plain polysaccharide vaccines, conjugate vaccines induce higher avidity antibody, immunologic memory leading to booster responses on repeat exposure to the antigen, long-term immunity, and herd immunity by decreasing carriage of the organism. As of 2009 in the USA, there were licensed conjugate vaccines to prevent Hib and pneumococcal and meningococcal diseases.

Serum antibodies may be detected as soon as 7-10 days after injection of antigen. Early antibodies are usually of the IgM class that can fix complement. IgM antibodies tend to decline as IgG antibodies increase. The IgG antibodies tend to peak approximately 1 mo after vaccination and with most vaccines persist for some time after a primary vaccine course. Secondary or booster responses occur more rapidly and result from rapid proliferation of memory B and T lymphocytes.

Assessment of the immune response to most vaccines is performed by measuring serum antibodies. Although detection of serum antibody at levels considered protective after vaccination can indicate immunity, loss of detectable antibody over time does not necessarily mean susceptibility to disease. Some vaccines induce immunologic memory, leading to a booster or anamnestic response on exposure to the microorganism, leading to protection from disease. In some instances, cellular immune response is used to evaluate immune status. For some vaccines (e.g., acellular pertussis), there is no accepted serologic correlate of protection.

Live-attenuated vaccines routinely recommended for children and adolescents include measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR); rotavirus; and varicella. In addition, a cold-adapted live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) is available as an alternative to the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) for children 2-18 yr of age who do not have conditions that place them at high risk for complications from influenza. Live-attenuated vaccines tend to induce long-term immune responses. They replicate, often similar to natural infections, until an immune response shuts down reproduction. Most live vaccines are administered in 1- or 2-dose schedules. The purpose of repeat doses, such as a second dose of the MMR vaccine, is to induce an initial immune response in persons who failed to respond to the first dose.

The remaining vaccines in the recommended schedule for children and adolescents are inactivated vaccines. Inactivated vaccines tend to require multiple doses to induce an adequate immune response and are more likely to need booster doses to maintain that immunity than live-attenuated vaccines. However, some inactivated vaccines appear to induce long-term immunity, perhaps life-long immunity, after a primary series, including HepB vaccine and inactivated polio vaccine (IPV).

Vaccination System in the USA

Vaccine Development

Basic scientific knowledge about an organism, its pathogenesis, and the immune responses thought to be associated with protection are financed primarily through government sponsorship of academic research, although private industry plays a major role (Fig. 165-1). Private industry usually assumes the lead role for guiding potential vaccine candidates through preclinical testing in humans into human clinical trials. There are three phases of prelicensure clinical trials: phase I, involving generally <100 participants to gauge safety and dosing; phase II, involving several hundred or more participants to refine safety and dosing; and phase III or pivotal trials that can involve thousands or tens of thousands of participants. Phase III trials are the major basis for licensure. Following successful clinical development, the sponsor applies to the FDA for vaccine licensure. Estimates for the cost of development for each vaccine range to $800 million or more. Following licensure by the FDA, postlicensure monitoring is performed on hundreds of thousands to millions of people to monitor safety and effectiveness.

image

Figure 165-1 Vaccine development and testing.

(Modified from Pickering LK, Orenstein WE: Development of pediatric vaccine recommendations and policies. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis 13[3]:148–154, 2002.)

Vaccine Policy

There are 2 major committees that make vaccine policy recommendations for children: the Committee on Infectious Diseases (COID) of the AAP (the Red Book Committee) and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). At least annually, the AAP, the ACIP, and the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) issue a harmonized childhood and adolescent immunization schedule (www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/schedules/default.htm). The COID consists primarily of academic pediatric infectious disease specialists with liaisons from practicing pediatricians, professional organizations, and government agencies including the FDA, CDC, and National Institutes of Health (NIH). Recommendations of the COID must be approved by the AAP Board of Directors. The ACIP consists of 15 members who are academic infectious disease experts (for both children and adults), family physicians, state and local public health officials, nurses, and consumers. The ACIP also has extensive liaison representation from major medical societies, government agencies, managed care, and others. The AAP recommendations are published in the Red Book and in issues of Pediatrics. The ACIP recommendations, available at www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/ACIP-list.htm, are official only after approval by the CDC director, which leads to publication in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR).

Vaccine Financing

Between 55 and 60% of vaccines routinely administered to children and adolescents <19 yr of age are purchased thorough a contract negotiated by the federal government with licensed vaccine manufacturers. There are 3 major sources of funds that can purchase vaccines through this contract.

The greatest portion comes from the Vaccines for Children (VFC) program, a federal entitlement program. The VFC program covers children on Medicaid, children without any insurance (uninsured), and Native Americans and Alaska Natives. In addition, children who have insurance but whose insurance does not cover immunization (underinsured) can be covered through VFC, but only if they go to a federally qualified health center (FQHC) (http://www.cms.gov/center/fqhc.asp). In contrast to other public funding sources that require approval of discretionary funding by legislative bodies, VFC funds are immediately available for new recommendations provided the ACIP votes the vaccine and the recommendation for its use into the VFC program, the federal government negotiates a contract, and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) apportions funds. The VFC program can provide free vaccines to participating private providers.

The second major federal funding source is the 317 Discretionary Federal Grant Program to states and selected localities. These funds must be appropriated annually by Congress, but in contrast to VFC, they have not had eligibility requirements for use. The third major public source of funds is state appropriations. The VFC program itself does not cover vaccine administration costs. Medicaid covers the administration fees for children enrolled in that program. Parents of other children eligible for VFC must pay administration fees out of pocket, although there is a stipulation in the law that no one eligible for the program can be denied vaccines because of inability to pay the administration fee. The Affordalde Care Act may lead to changes in financing.

Vaccine Safety Monitoring

Monitoring vaccine safety is the responsibility of the FDA, CDC, and vaccine manufacturers. A critical part of that monitoring depends on reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Adverse events following immunization can be reported by calling 1-800-822-7967 or completing a VAERS form that can be obtained from www.vaers.hhs.gov. Individual VAERS case reports may be helpful in generating hypotheses about whether vaccines are causing certain clinical syndromes, but in general they are not helpful in evaluating the causal role of vaccines in the adverse event. This is because most clinical syndromes that follow vaccination are similar to syndromes that occur in the absence of vaccination. For causality assessment, epidemiologic studies are often necessary, comparing the incidence rate of the adverse event after vaccination with the rate in the unvaccinated. A statistically significant higher rate in the vaccinated would be consistent with causation.

The Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) consists of inpatient and outpatient records of some of the largest managed-care organizations in the USA and facilitates causality evaluation. In addition, the clinical immunization safety assessment network (CISA) has been established to advise primary care physicians on evaluation and management of adverse events (www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Activities/CISA.html). The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has reviewed independently a variety of vaccine safety concerns (available at www.iom.edu/imsafety and Table 165-4). In no instance did the IOM find that evidence favored acceptance of a causal link between the postulated adverse event and vaccines.

Table 165-4 INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE IMMUNIZATION SAFETY REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORTS, 2001-2004

REPORT DATE OF RELEASE
Measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and autism April 2001
Thimerosal-containing vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders October 2001
Multiple immunizations and immune dysfunction February 2002*
Hepatitis B vaccine and demyelinating neurologic disorders May 2002
SV40 contamination of polio vaccine and cancer October 2002
Vaccinations and sudden unexpected death in infancy March 2003
Influenza vaccines and neurologic complications October 2003
Vaccines and autism May 2004

Data from http://www.iom.edu/imsafety.

* Reviews relationship of vaccines to asthma, diabetes, and heterologous infections.

From Cohn AC et al: Immunizations in the US: a rite of passage, Pediatr Clin North Am 52:669–693, 2005.

The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), established in 1988, is designed to compensate persons injured by vaccines in the childhood and adolescent immunization schedule. The program is funded through an excise tax of $0.75 per disease prevented per dose. As of 2010, all of the routinely recommended vaccines that protect children against 16 diseases are covered by this program. The NVICP was established to provide a no-fault system. There is a table of related injuries and time frames. All persons alleging injury from covered vaccines must first file with the program. If the injury meets the requirements of the table, compensation is automatic. If not, the claimant has the responsibility to prove causality. If compensation is accepted, the claimant cannot sue the manufacturer or physician administering the vaccine. If the claimant rejects the judgment of the compensation system, he or she can enter the tort system, but this has only occurred rarely. Information on the NVICP is available at 1-800-338-2382 and www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/. All physicians administering a vaccine covered by the program are required by law to give the approved Vaccine Information Statement (VIS) to the child’s parent or guardian at each visit before administering vaccines. Information on the VIS can be obtained from www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/vis/default.htm.

Recommended Immunization Schedule

All children in the USA should be vaccinated against 15 diseases (Figs. 165-2 and 165-3) (annually updated schedule available at http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/acip/default.htm). Girls 11-12 yr old should also receive HPV. Boys may receive HPV4 to prevent genital warts, but this is a permissive recommendation.

HepB vaccine is recommended in a 3-dose schedule starting at birth. The birth dose is critical for children born to mothers who are hepatitis B surface antigen positive (HBsAg) or whose immune status is unknown.

The DTaP series consists of 5 doses. The 4th dose of DTaP may be administered as early as 12 mo of age, provided 6 mo has elapsed since the 3rd dose and the child is unlikely to return at 15-18 mo of age. A booster, consisting of an adult preparation of Tdap, is recommended at 11-12 yr of age. Adolescents 13-18 yr of age who missed the 11-12 year old Tdap booster dose should receive a single dose of Tdap if they have completed the diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTP)/DTaP series. Tdap may be given at any interval following the last Td.

There are 3 licensed preparations of single antigen Hib vaccines. The vaccine conjugated to tetanus toxoid (PRP-T) is given in a 4-dose series, and the Hib vaccine conjugated to meningococcal outer membrane protein (PRP-OMP) is recommended in a 3-dose series. The third Hib vaccine is licensed as a booster for children 15 mo through 4 yr of age.

TIV is recommended for all 6 mo-18 yr old children. Children <9 yr being vaccinated for the 1st time require 2 doses at least 4 wk apart. If such children only received a single dose of TIV the prior season, they need the full 2 doses the following season. However, if 2 doses were received in the prior influenza season, only 1 dose is needed in each subsequent season. TIV usually is given in October or November, although there may be benefits even when administered as late as February or March because influenza seasons most commonly peak in February.

IPV should be given at 2, 4, 6-18 mo and 4-6 yr of age. PCV13 is recommended at 2, 4, 6, and 12-15 mo of age. The final dose in the IPV series should be administered at ≥4 yr of age regardless of the number of previous doses, and the minimal interval from dose 3 to dose 4 is 6 mo. MMR should be administered at 12-15 mo of age followed by a 2nd dose at 4-6 yr of age. Varicella vaccine should be given at 12-18 mo of age and at 4-6 yr of age.

The quadrivalent measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella (MMRV) vaccine is preferred in place of separate MMR and varicella vaccines at the 4-6 yr old visit. Because of increased febrile seizures associated with combined MMRV vaccine compared to the separate products, use of MMRV is not preferred over use of separate MMR and varicella vaccines for the initial dose at 12-15 mo of age.

Hepatitis A vaccine, licensed for administration to children ≥12 mo of age, is recommended for universal administration to all children at 12-23 mo of age and for certain high-risk groups. The 2 doses in the series should be separated by at least 6 mo.

A 2-dose series of MCV4 is recommended for all adolescents at 11-12 yr and at 16 yr of age. In addition, MCV4 should be administered to people 2 through 55 yr of age with underlying conditions that place them at high risk of meningococcal disease. People with high-risk conditions should receive 2 doses of MCV4 at 0 and 2 mo followed by booster doses.

HPV4 or HPV2 is recommended in a 3-dose series for prevention of cervical precancers and cancers in females. HPV4 may be administered in a 3-dose series to females and males 9 through 18 yr of age to reduce their likelihood of acquiring genital warts. The second dose should be given 1-2 mo after the first; the third is given 6 mo after the first.

Two rotavirus vaccines are available, RotaTeq (RV5) and Rotarix (RV1). With both vaccines, the first dose can be administered as early as 6 wk of age and must be administered by 14 wk 6 days. The final dose in the series must be administered no later than 8 mo of age. The RV5 vaccine is administered in 3 doses at least 4 wk apart. The RV1 vaccine is administered in 2 doses at least 4 wk apart.

The present schedule, excluding influenza vaccine, can require as many as 31 injections, including 22 injections prior to 2 yr of age. Influenza vaccination, starting at 6 mo of age can add an additional 20 injections through 18 yr of age. To reduce the injection burdens, several combination vaccines are available: DTaP-IPV/Hib (Pentacel, Sanofi Pasteur, Swiftwater, PA), DTaP-IPV-HepB (Pediarix, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC), Hib (PRP-OMP)-HepB (Comvax, Merck, West Point, PA) MMRV (ProQuad, Merck, West Point, PA), DTaP-IPV (Kinrix, GlaxoSmithKline), and DTaP/Hib (TriHIBit, Sanofi Pasteur). Pentacel is indicated for the first 4 doses of DTaP and Hib vaccine, usually administered at 2, 4, 6, and 15-18 mo of age. Pentacel reduces the number of injections required from 11 to 4. IPV can be administered as part of Pentacel, but a dose of IPV is still indicated on or after the 4th birthday. Pediarix can be used for the first 3 doses of the 3 vaccines, reducing the number of injections from 9 to 3. Comvax can be used as a 3 dose series at 2, 4, and 12-15 mo and potentially reduces the number of injections from 6 (or 8 if another Hib preparation is used) to 3. Kinrix is licensed as a booster for the 5th dose of DTaP and 4th dose of IPV; and TriHIBit is licensed as the 4th dose of the Hib and DTaP series. Because a birth dose of single antigen HepB vaccine is recommended when using combinations, which cannot be administered before 6 wk of age, a 4-dose series for HepB, counting the birth dose, may be used.

The recommended childhood and adolescent immunization schedule establishes a routine adolescent visit at 11-12 yr of age. MCV4 and a Tdap booster should be administered during this visit and HPV can be started. Influenza vaccine should be administered annually. In addition, the 11-12 yr old visit is also an opportune time to review all of the immunizations the child has received previously, to provide any doses that were missed, and to review other age-appropriate preventive services. The 11-12 year old visit establishes an important platform for incorporating other vaccines. Information on the current status of new vaccine licensure and recommendations for use can be obtained at aapredbook.aappublications.org/news/vaccstatus.shtml and www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM093833.

For children who are at least 1 mo behind in their immunizations, catch-up immunization schedules are available for children 4 mo to 18 yr of age (Fig. 165-4); also available for children <6 yr of age at www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/schedules/child-schedule.htm#catchup) is an interactive immunization scheduler.

Vaccines Recommended in Special Circumstances

Several vaccines are recommended for children at increased risk for complications from vaccine-preventable diseases or children who have an increased risk for exposure to these diseases.

PCV13 is recommended for all children <5 yr of age who have conditions that place them at high risk for pneumococcal disease. This recommendation includes children with sickle cell disease (SCD) and other sickle cell hemoglobinopathies, including hemoglobin SS, hemoglobin S-C, or hemoglobin S–β-thalassemia, or children who are functionally or anatomically asplenic; children with HIV infection; children who have chronic disease, including chronic cardiac and pulmonary disease (excluding asthma), diabetes mellitus, or CSF leak. Also included are children with immunocompromising conditions, including malignancies (e.g., leukemia, lymphoma, Hodgkin disease); chronic renal failure or nephrotic syndrome; children receiving immunosuppressive chemotherapy, including long-term systemic corticosteroids; and children who have received a solid organ transplant. In addition, children with cochlear implants should be vaccinated. Children at high risk for pneumococcal disease also should receive PPS23 to provide immunity to serotypes not contained in the 13-valent conjugate vaccine. PPS23 should be administered on or after the 2nd birthday and should follow completion of the PCV13 series by at least 6-8 wk. Two doses of PPS23 are recommended, with an interval of 5 yr between doses. Immunization of previously unvaccinated children with high-risk conditions >5 yr of age can be performed with either a dose of PCV13 or a dose of PPS23.

MCV4 is recommended for people with HIV, children with functional or anatomic asplenia, persistent complement component or properdin deficiencies, and as part of outbreak-control programs. MCV4 is preferred and is licensed for children 2-10 yr of age with underlying high-risk conditions.

A variety of vaccines are available for children who will be traveling to areas of the world where certain infectious diseases are common in addition to vaccines in the recommended childhood and adolescent schedule (Table 165-5). Vaccines for travelers include typhoid fever, HepA, HepB, Japanese encephalitis, MCV4 or MPS4, rabies, and yellow fever, depending on the location and circumstances of travel. Measles is endemic in many parts of the world. Children 6-11 mo of age may receive a dose of MMR before travel. However, doses of measles vaccine received before the 1st birthday should not be counted in determining compliance with the recommended 2-dose MMR schedule. Additional information on vaccines for international travel can be found at www.cdc.gov/travel/content/vaccinations.aspx.

Vaccine recommendations for children with immunocompromise, either primary (inherited) or secondary (acquired), vary according to the underlying condition, the degree of immune deficit, the risk for exposure to disease, and the vaccine (Table 165-6). Immunization of children with immunocompromise poses the following potential concerns: the incidence or severity of some vaccine-preventable diseases is higher, and therefore certain vaccines are recommended specifically for certain conditions; vaccines may be less effective during the period of altered immunocompetence and may need to be repeated when immune competence is restored; and because of altered immunocompetence, some children and adolescents may be at increased risk for an adverse event following receipt of a live viral vaccine. Live-attenuated vaccines generally are contraindicated in immunocompromised people. The exceptions include MMR, which may be given to a child with HIV infection provided the child is asymptomatic or symptomatic without evidence of severe immunosuppression, and varicella vaccine, which may be given to HIV-infected children if the CD4+ lymphocyte count is at least 15%. MMRV is not recommended in these situations.

Altered immunocompetence is considered a precaution for rotavirus; however, the vaccine is contraindicated in children with severe combined immunodeficiency disease. Inactivated vaccines may be administered to immunocompromised children, although, depending on the immune deficit, their effectiveness might not be optimal. Children with complement deficiency disorders may receive all vaccines, including live-attenuated vaccines. In contrast, children with phagocytic disorders may receive both inactivated and live-attenuated viral vaccines but not live-attenuated bacterial vaccines.

Corticosteroids can suppress the immune system. Children receiving corticosteroids (≥2 mg/kg/day or ≥20 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent) for 14 or more days should not receive live vaccines until therapy has been discontinued for at least 1 month. Children on the same dose levels but for <2 wk may receive live viral vaccines as soon as therapy is discontinued, although some experts would wait 2 wk post-therapy. Children receiving lower doses of steroids may be vaccinated while on therapy.

Children and adolescents with malignancy, and those who have undergone solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and immunosuppressive or radiation therapy, should not receive live virus and live bacterial vaccines depending on their immune status. Children who have undergone chemotherapy for leukemia may need to be reimmunized with age appropriate single doses of previously administered vaccines.

Preterm infants generally can be vaccinated at the same chronologic age as full-term infants according to the recommended childhood immunization schedule. An exception is the birth dose of HepB vaccine. Infants weighing ≥2 kg and who are stable may receive a birth dose. However, HepB vaccination should be deferred in infants weighing <2 kg at birth until 30 days of age, if born to an HBsAg-negative mother. All preterm, low birth weight infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers should receive HepB IG and HepB vaccine within 12 hr of birth. However, such infants should receive an additional 3 doses of vaccine starting at 30 days of age (see Fig. 165-2).

Some children have situations that are not addressed directly in current immunization schedules. There are general rules that physicians can use to guide immunization decisions in some of these instances. In general, vaccines may be given simultaneously on the same day, whether inactivated or live. Different inactivated vaccines can be administered at any interval between doses. However, because of theoretical concerns about viral interference, different live-attenuated vaccines (MMR, varicella, LAIV) if not administered on the same day, should be given at least 1 mo apart. An inactivated and a live vaccine may be spaced at any interval from each other.

IG does not interfere with killed vaccines. However, IG can interfere with the immune response to measles vaccine and by inference to varicella vaccine. In general, IG, if needed, should be administered at least 2 wk after measles vaccine. Depending on the dose of IG received, MMR should be deferred for as long as 3-11 mo. IG is not expected to interfere with the immune response to LAIV or rotavirus vaccines.

Many agents have been considered for potential use as weapons of bioterrorism. For most of these agents, licensed vaccines are not available in the USA, although vaccines are being developed for some organisms, including botulinum toxoid, Ebola virus, plague, and others. Anthrax vaccine and smallpox (vaccinia) vaccine are available, but they are not recommended for children. Both are indicated in a pre-exposure setting only for selected adults with potential occupational risks of exposure (www.bt.cdc.gov/ provides details on which groups are recommended for vaccination).

Precautions and Contraindications

Observation of valid precautions and contraindications is critical to ensure that vaccines are used in the safest manner possible and to obtain optimal immunogenicity. When a child presents for immunization with a clinical condition considered a precaution, the physician must weigh benefits and risks to that individual child. If benefits are judged to outweigh risks, then the vaccine or vaccines in question may be administered. A contraindication means the vaccine should not be administered under any circumstances.

A general contraindication for all vaccines is anaphylactic reaction to a prior dose. Anaphylactic hypersensitivity to vaccine constituents is also a contraindication. However, if a vaccine is essential, there are desensitizing protocols for some vaccines. The major constituents of concern are egg proteins for vaccines grown in eggs; gelatin, a stabilizer in many vaccines; and antimicrobial agents. The measles and mumps components of MMR are grown in chick embryo fibroblast tissue culture. However, the amount of egg protein in MMR is so small as not to require any special procedures before administering vaccine to someone with a history of anaphylaxis following egg ingestion.

Vaccines usually should be deferred in children with moderate to severe acute illnesses, regardless of the presence of fever, until the child recovers. However, children with mild illnesses may be vaccinated. Studies of undervaccinated children have documented opportunities that were missed because mild illness was used as an invalid contraindication. Complete tables of contraindications and contraindication misperceptions can be found at www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/vac-admin/contraindications.htm.

Improving Immunization Coverage

Standards for child and adolescent immunization practices have been developed to support achievement of high levels of immunization coverage while providing vaccines in a safe and effective manner and educating parents about risks and benefits of vaccines (Table 165-7).

Table 165-7 STANDARDS FOR CHILD AND ADOLESCENT IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES

AVAILABILITY OF VACCINES

ASSESSMENT OF VACCINATION STATUS

EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION ABOUT VACCINE BENEFITS AND RISKS

PROPER STORAGE AND ADMINISTRATION OF VACCINES AND DOCUMENTATION OF VACCINATIONS

IMPLEMENTATION OF STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE VACCINATION COVERAGE

From the National Vaccine Advisory Committee: Standards for child and adolescent immunization practices. Pediatrics 112:958–963, 2003.

Despite the benefits that vaccines have to offer, many children are underimmunized as a result of not receiving recommended vaccines or not receiving them at the recommended ages. Much of the underimmunization problem can be solved through physician actions. Most children have a regular source of health care. However, missed opportunities to provide immunizations at health care visits include failure to provide all recommended vaccines that could be administered at a single visit during that visit, failure to provide immunizations to children outside of well child care when the conditions children may have are not contraindications to immunizations, and referral of children to public health clinics because of inability to pay for vaccines. Simultaneous administration of multiple vaccines generally is safe and effective. When the benefits of simultaneous vaccination are explained, many parents prefer such immunization rather than needing to make an extra visit. Providing all needed vaccines simultaneously should be the standard of practice.

Only valid contraindications and precautions to vaccine administration should be observed. Ideally immunizations should be provided during well child visits, but using other visits to administer vaccines if there are no contraindications, particularly if a child is behind in the schedule, is important. There is no good evidence that providing immunizations outside of well child care ultimately decreases well child visits.

Financial barriers to immunization should be minimized. Participation in the VFC program allows physicians to receive free vaccines for their eligible patients, which helps such patients be immunized in their medical home.

Several interventions have been shown to help physicians increase immunization coverage in their practices. Reminder systems for children before an appointment or recall systems for children who fail to keep appointments have repeatedly been demonstrated to improve coverage. Assessment and feedback is also an important intervention. Many physicians overestimate the immunization coverage among patients they serve and thus are not motivated to make any changes in their practices to improve performance. Assessing the immunization coverage of patients served by an individual physician and feedback of results can be a major motivator for improvement. Often public health departments can be contacted to provide the assessments and feedback. Alternatively, physicians can perform some self-assessments. Review of approximately 60 consecutive charts of 2 yr old children may provide a reasonable estimate of practice coverage. Another help is to have a staff member review the chart of every patient coming in for a visit and placing immunization needs reminders on the chart for the physician.

Some parents refuse immunization for their child. Pediatricians should try to open a dialogue with such parents to understand the reasons for refusal and try to work with them to overcome their concerns over time during the course of visits. Discussion should be based on the reason for refusal and the knowledge of the parent. Pediatricians should refer patients to reputable sources for vaccine information (Table 165-8) and discuss risks and benefits of vaccines. Physician concerns about liability should be addressed by appropriate documentation of discussions in the chart. The Committee on Bioethics of the AAP has published guidelines for dealing with parents’ refusal of immunization. Physicians also might wish to consider having parents sign a refusal waiver. A sample of a refusal to vaccinate waiver can be found at www.aap.org/immunization/pediatricians/pdf/ReducingVaccineLiability.pdf.

Table 165-8 VACCINE WEBSITES AND RESOURCES

ORGANIZATION WEBSITE
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) www.familydoctor.org/online/famdocen/home.html
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) www.aap.org/
AAP Childhood Immunization Support Program www.aap.org/immunization/
American Medical Association (AMA) www.ama-assn.org/
American Nurses Association (ANA) www.nursingworld.org/
Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO) www.astho.org/
Association of Teachers of Preventive Medicine (ATPM) www.atpm.org/
National Medical Association (NMA) www.nmanet.org/
NONPROFIT GROUPS AND UNIVERSITIES
Albert B. Sabin Vaccine Institute www.sabin.org/
Allied Vaccine Group (AVG) www.vaccine.org/
Children’s Vaccine Program www.path.org/vaccineresources/
Every Child By Two (ECBT) www.ecbt.org/
Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) www.gavialliance.org/
Health on the Net Foundation (HON) www.hon.ch/
National Healthy Mothers, Healthy Babies Coalition (HMHB) www.hmhb.org/
Immunization Action Coalition (IAC) www.immunize.org/
Institute for Vaccine Safety (IVS), Johns Hopkins University www.vaccinesafety.edu/
Institute of Medicine www.iom.edu/Activities/PublicHealth/ImmunizationSafety.aspx
National Alliance for Hispanic Health www.hispanichealth.org/
National Network for Immunization Information (NNii) www.immunizationinfo.org/
Parents of Kids with Infectious Diseases (PKIDS) www.pkids.org/
The Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia www.chop.edu/service/vaccine-education-center/home.html
The Vaccine Place www.vaccineplace.com/?fa=home
GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Public Health Image Library www.phil.cdc.gov/phil/home.asp
Travelers’ Health www.cdc.gov/travel/
Vaccines and Immunizations www.cdc.gov/vaccines/
Vaccine Safety www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/index.html
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
National Vaccine Program Office (NVPO) www.hhs.gov/nvpo/
Health Resources and Services Administration
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Vaccines www.niaid.nih.gov/topics/vaccines/Pages/Default.aspx
World Health Organization (WHO)
Immunization, Vaccines, and Biologicals www.who.int/immunization/en/

Bibliography

American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy statement: recommended childhood and adolescent immunization schedules—United States, 2011. Pediatrics. 2011;127(20):387-388.

American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine and Council on Community Pediatrics. Policy statement: increasing immunization coverage. Pediatrics. 2010;125:1295-1304.

Atkinson W, Wolfe C, Hamborsky J, McIntyre L, editors. Epidemiology and prevention of vaccine-preventable diseases, ed 11, Washington, DC: Public Health Foundation, 2009.

Berberich FR, Landman Z. Reducing immunization discomfort in 4- to 6-year-old children: a randomized clinical trial. Pediatrics. 2009;124:e203-e209.

Bryant KA, Block SL, Baker SA, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Pediatrics. 2010;125:866-875.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. General recommendations on immunization. MMWR. 2011;60(2):3-61.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention of pneumococcal disease among infants and children—use of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. MMWR. 2011;59(No. RR-11):1-19.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommended adult immunization schedule—United States, 2011. MMWR. 2011;60(4):1-4.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated recommendations for use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine from the advisory committee on immunization practices, 2010. MMWR. 2011;60(1):13-16.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated recommendations for use of meningococcal conjugate vaccines—advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP), 2010. MMWR. 2011;60(3):72-76.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ACIP recommendations (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices). (website) www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/ACIP-list.htm Accessed March 4, 2011

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Use of combination measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella vaccine. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59(RR-3):1-12.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommended immunization schedules for persons aged 0 through 18 years—United States, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;58:51-52.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. General recommendations on immunization: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR 15):1-48.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommended immunization schedules for persons aged 0 through 18 years—United States, 2009. MMWR. 2009;57(51&52):Q1-Q4.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vaccine preventable deaths and the global immunization vision and strategy, 2006–2015. JAMA. 2006;295:2840-2842.

Cohn AC, Broder KR, Pickering LK. Immunizations in the US: a rite of passage. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2005;52:669-693.

Diekema DS. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics: responding to refusals of immunization of children. Pediatrics. 2005;115:1428-1431.

Kelso JM, Li JT. Adverse reactions to vaccines. Ann Allerg Asthma Immunol. 2009;103:S1-S14.

The Medical Letter. A new conjugate meningococcal vaccine (Menveo). Med Lett. 2010;52(1343):59-60.

Omer SB, Salmon DA, Orenstein WA, et al. Vaccine refusal, mandatory immunization, and the risks of vaccine-preventable diseases. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1981-1988.

O’Brien KL, Levine OS. Effectiveness of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Lancet. 2006;368:1469-1470.

Orenstein WA, Douglas RG, Rodewald LE, Hinman AR. Immunizations in the US: success, structure and stress. Health Affairs. 2005;24:559-610.

O’Ryan M, Matson DO. New rotavirus vaccines: renewed optimism. J Pediatr. 2006;149:448-451.

Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Kimberlin DW, Long SS, editors. Red book: 2009 report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, ed 28, Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics, 2009.

Pickering LK, Baker CS, Freed GL, et al. Immunization programs for infants, children, adolescents, and adults: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Disease Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:817-840.

Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA, Offit PA, editors. Vaccines, ed 5, Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2008.

Prymula R, Siegrist CA, Chilbek R, et al. Effect of prophylactic paracetamol administration at time of vaccination on febrile reactions and antibody responses in children: two open-label, randomized controlled trials. Lancet. 2009;374:1339-1350.

Tan LKK, Carlone GM, Borrow R. Advances in the development of vaccines against Neisseria meningitides. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(16):1511-1520.

Varricchio F, Iskander J, Destefano F, et al. Understanding vaccine safety information from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004;23:287-294.

Zimmerman RK. Size of the needle for infant vaccination: longer needles reduce incidence of local reactions. BMJ. 2006;333:563-564.

165.1 International Immunization Practices

Vaccines are used to prevent infectious diseases around the world. However, the types of vaccines in use, the indications and contraindications, and the immunization schedules vary substantially. Most developing countries follow the immunization schedules promulgated by the World Health Organization’s Immunization Programme; the latest update is available at www.who.int/immunization/policy/Immunization_routine_table2.pdf.

According to this schedule, all children should be vaccinated at birth against tuberculosis with bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine. Many children also receive a dose of the live-attenuated oral polio vaccine (OPV) at this time. Immunization visits are scheduled for 6, 10, and 14 wk of age when DTP vaccine and OPV are administered. Measles vaccine is given at 9 mo of age. Nearly all developing countries have implemented HepB vaccination. Three schedule options may be used depending on epidemiologic and programmatic considerations. HepB vaccine can be given at the same time as DTP vaccine doses at 6, 9, and 14 wk of age, often in combination vaccines. To prevent perinatal transmission, the first dose should be administered as soon as possible after birth (<24 hr) and at 6 and 14 wk of age. Yellow fever and Japanese encephalitis vaccines are recommended for infants 9 mo of age living in endemic areas. Substantial efforts have been made to incorporate Hib vaccines into all but 10 developing countries that are eligible for support by the GAVI Alliance (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation), often within a DPT-based combination vaccine.

In the next few yr, the support from the GAVI Alliance will facilitate the adoption of rotavirus and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines into developing country immunization programs. The increased coverage with these additional vaccines will considerably reduce the global childhood morbidity and mortality due to pneumonia, meningitis, and diarrheal diseases.

In 1988, the World Health Assembly endorsed the goal of eradicating polio from the world by the end of 2000. While that goal has not been reached, endemic polio transmission has been curtailed to three countries in south Asia (India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan) and one country in Africa. Other countries have had outbreaks from imported cases. The principal strategy has been use of OPV both for routine immunization as well as in mass campaigns, at least twice per year, during which all children <5 yr of age are targeted for immunization, regardless of prior immunization status. Once termination of wild polio virus transmission is achieved, the eventual goal is to stop use of OPV, which can rarely cause vaccine-associated polio and which is capable of mutating and taking on the phenotypic characteristics of the wild viruses.

The countries in Latin America have maintained the elimination of indigenous circulation of measles since 2002. The strategy called for attainment of high routine immunization coverage of infants with a dose at 9 mo of age, a 1-time mass campaign targeting all persons 9 mo-14 yr of age regardless of prior immunization status, and follow-up campaigns of children born since the prior campaign, generally every 3-5 yr. Meanwhile, global measles mortality in all ages has been reduced by nearly 70%, from an estimated 757,000 deaths in 2000 to 242,000 in 2006. The largest percentage in mortality reduction, 91%, was achieved in Africa, which has scaled up the implementation of the successful elimination strategy initiated in the Americas. Latin American countries have now embarked on efforts to eliminate indigenous rubella with strategies consisting of both routine immunization and mass campaigns.

Immunization schedules in the industrialized world are substantially more variable than in the developing world. Immunization recommendations for Canada are developed by the Canadian National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) but are implemented somewhat differently by each province. The Canadian schedule is similar to the U.S. immunization schedule (http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/im/is-cv/index-eng.php). Conjugate meningococcal serogroup C vaccine (MCV-C) is recommended in a 3-dose series at 2, 4, and 6 mo of age. A single dose is recommended after 12 mo of age if the child has never been immunized or has received <3 doses in infancy. The province of Ontario, Canada, has a recommendation for annual vaccination of all persons 6 mo and older with trivalent influenza vaccine.

There is tremendous variation in vaccines used and the immunization schedules recommended in Europe. European immunization schedules can be reviewed at www.who.int/vaccines/globalsummary/immunization/ScheduleSelect.cfm. As an example, the UK developed an immunization schedule during the late 1980s that includes visits at 2, 3, and 4 mo of age where a combination DTaP-Hib-IPV vaccine is administered. Following evidence that a three-dose series of Hib vaccine at these ages was insufficient to ensure long-term, high-grade protection, a booster dose was added at 12 mo of age. MMR is recommended in a 2-dose schedule at 13 mo and 3-5 yr of age. During the 2nd MMR visit, a booster of DTaP and IPV is provided. A Td/IPV booster is recommended between 13 and 18 yr of age. PCV7 is recommended at 2, 4, and 13 mo of age. The UK was the first country to use MCV-C vaccine during a massive catch-up campaign for children, adolescents, and young adults. The effectiveness of the vaccine in the 1st year was 88% or greater, and herd immunity was induced with an approximate two-thirds reduction in the incidence among unvaccinated children. MCV-C is administered at 3, 4, and 12 mo of age. In September 2008, HPV vaccine was recommended for girls 12-13 yr old. As of July 2009, the UK schedule did not include HepB vaccine, varicella vaccine, or influenza vaccine for universal childhood immunization (see www.immunisation.nhs.uk/).

The Japanese immunization schedule in 2009 is substantially different from that in the USA. The Japanese do not use MMR and rely on individual vaccines for measles and rubella or combined MR. Japanese children also are vaccinated routinely against polio with OPV; against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis with DTaP; against Japanese encephalitis; and against tuberculosis with BCG. Adults 65 yr of age and older receive annual influenza vaccinations. The Japanese schedule does not include any vaccines against encapsulated bacteria.

Some children come to the USA having started or completed international immunization schedules with vaccines produced outside of the USA. In general, doses administered in other countries should be considered valid if administered at the same ages as recommended in the USA. For missing doses, age-inappropriate doses, lost immunization records, or other concerns, pediatricians have 2 options: Administer or repeat missing or inappropriate doses or perform serologic tests, and if they are negative, administer vaccines.

Bibliography

American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases. Recommended childhood and adolescent immunization schedule—United States, 2007. Pediatrics. 2007;119:207-208.

Atkinson W, Hamborsky J, McIntyre L, et al, editors. Epidemiology and prevention of vaccine-preventable diseases, ed 9, Washington, DC: Public Health Foundation, 2006.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. General recommendations on immunization: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;55:Q1-Q3.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommended adult immunization schedule, United States, October 2006–September 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55:Q1-Q4.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Update: Guillain-Barré syndrome among recipients of Menactra meningococcal conjugate vaccine—United States, June 2005–September 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55:1120-1124.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Progress in global measles control and mortality reduction, 2000–2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57:1303-1306.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. vaccine preventable deaths and the global immunization vision and strategy, 2006–2015. JAMA. 2006;295:2840-2842.

Clark HF, Offit PA, Plotkin SA, et al. The new pentavalent rotavirus vaccine composed of bovine (strain WC3) human rotavirus reassortments. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006;25:577-582.

Cohn AC, Broder KR, Pickering LK. Immunizations in the US: a rite of passage. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2005;52:669-693.

Diekema DS. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics: Responding to refusals of immunization of children. Pediatrics. 2005;115:1428-1431.

O’Brien KL, Levine OS. Effectiveness of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Lancet. 2006;368:1469-1470.

Omer SB, Pan WKY, Halsey NA, et al. Nonmedical exemptions to school immunization requirements: secular trends and association of state policies with pertussis incidence. JAMA. 2006;296:1757-1763.

Orenstein WA, Douglas RG, Rodewald LE, et al. Immunizations in the US: success, structure and stress. Health Affairs. 2005;24:559-610.

O’Ryan M, Matson DO. New rotavirus vaccines: renewed optimism. J Pediatr. 2006;149:448-451.

Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Long SS, et al, editors. Red book: 2009 report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, ed 28. American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, IL, 2009;1-104.

Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA, editors. Vaccines, ed 5, Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2007.

Varricchio F, Iskander J, Destefano F, et al. Understanding vaccine safety information from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004;23:287-294.

World Health Organization. Progress in global measles control and mortality, 2000–2007. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2008;83:441-448.

Zimmerman RK. Size of the needle for infant vaccination: longer needles reduce incidence of local reactions. BMJ. 2006;333:563-564.