Immune Responses in Tissues

Published on 18/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Allergy and Immunology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1521 times

Chapter 12 Immune Responses in Tissues

Tissue-specific immune responses

What determines whether an immune response should be comprised of, for example, activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) or a particular class of antibodies? Although immune responses are primarily tailored to the pathogen, there is also a strong influence from the local tissue, where the immune response occurs (Fig. 12.1).

This chapter focuses on:

There are several reasons why a particular organ may need to modify local immunity.

This is an example of how an immune response summoned to clear an infection can interfere with a tissue’s physiology as seriously as the infection itself. A similar outcome can occur in both the eye and the gut, which may be damaged by cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) and interferon-γ (IFNγ) produced locally during cell-mediated immune reactions.

Indeed, when TNFα and IFNγ reach high systemic levels, they can result in shock and rapid death. An example is seen in Dengue shock syndrome. Individuals who are immune to the Dengue virus or infants with maternal antibodies may develop rapid circulatory collapse. It is thought that interaction between activated T cells and macrophages causes the release of TNFα, which acts on endothelium leading to an increase in capillary permeability and consequent fall in blood pressure.

Moreover, some types of immune response are only appropriate in specific tissues.

These observations suggest that the immune responses in tissues are modulated in order to be appropriate for and effective at that site. Consequently, tissues have evolved regulatory mechanisms that influence the immune response that occurs within them.

Endothelium controls which leukocytes enter a tissue

Migration of leukocytes into different tissues of the body is dependent on the vascular endothelium in each tissue. For many years, it was thought that the endothelium in different tissues was essentially similar, with the possible exception of tissues such as the brain and retina, which have barrier properties (see below). Despite this common belief, it was well known that inflammation in different tissues had different characteristics, even when the inducing agents were similar.

It is now clear that a major element controlling inflammation and the immune response is the vascular endothelium in each tissue, which has its own characteristics; different endothelia produce distinctive blends of chemokines (Fig. 12.2). In addition the endothelium can transport chemokines produced by cells in the tissue from the basal to the lumenal surface by transcytosis, or by surface diffusion in tissues that lack barrier properties (Fig. 12.3).

The surface (glycocalyx) of vascular endothelium also varies considerably between tissues, and this affects which chemokines are retained on the lumenal surface, to signal to circulating leukocytes.

Hence the different sets of leukocytes present in each tissue can be partly related to the chemokines synthesized by the cells present, particularly the endothelium. For example, in normal lung there is a high level of macrophage migration, which relates to the high expression of CCL2 (macrophage chemotactic protein-1) by lung endothelium. In allergic asthma, the proportion of eosinophils increases, due to the production of IL-5 and CCL3 (eotaxin), which are characteristic of the TH2 response that tends to predominate in mucosal tissues (Fig. 12.4). By contrast, in the CNS lymphocytes and mononuclear phagocytes predominate in most immune reactions.

Immune reactions in the CNS

The CNS, including the brain, spinal cord, and retina of the eye is substantially shielded from immune reactions. The peripheral nervous system is also partially protected. The low levels of immune reactivity in the brain are ascribed to a number of factors:

The blood–brain barrier excludes most antibodies from the CNS

The blood–brain barrier is a composite structure formed by the specialized brain endothelium and the foot processes of astrocytes. Astrocytes are required to induce the special properties of brain endothelial cells, which have continuous belts of tight junctions connecting them to other endothelial cells (Fig. 12.5). An estimate of the tightness of the barrier is given by its trans-endothelial resistance, which is up to 2000 Ω/cm2 in the CNS by comparison with values <10 Ω/cm2 in most other tissues. In addition the brain endothelial cells have an array of transporters that allow nutrients into the CNS and a set of multi-drug resistance pumps that prevent many toxic molecules and therapeutic drugs from entering the brain. However, it is the very low permeability of the endothelium to serum proteins which is of particular interest for immunologists (see Fig. 12.5). For example, the level of IgG found in the CNS is normally approximately 0.2% of the level found in serum. The level may rise during an immune reaction as the endothelial barrier becomes more permeable in response to inflammatory cytokines. In some conditions, such as multiple sclerosis, there is often local synthesis of antibody within the CNS, which is reflected in abnormally high antibody levels in cerebrospinal fluid, even accounting for the increased leakage into the CNS. This finding demonstrates that some B cells have migrated into the CNS, and plasma cells have been identified in the spaces surrounding the larger blood vessels. Macrophages also contribute to immune reactions in CNS and they can synthesize some complement components locally (e.g. C3). However the overall level of serum proteins including antibodies and complement rarely exceeds 2% of the levels in serum even in the most severe inflammatory reactions.

Neurons suppress immune reactivity in neighboring glial cells

Researchers first examined single populations of cells from the CNS in vitro. For example, they found that astrocytes would respond to IFNγ by increasing their expression of MHC class I molecules and IFNγ would also induce the normally-absent MHC class II molecules. However, in vivo, astrocytes rarely respond in this way. It appeared that the local environment of the CNS could in some way suppress the ability of astrocytes to respond to IFNγ.

Subsequently it was found that when neurons are co-cultured in contact with astrocytes, then the ability to induce MHC molecules was suppressed, but if the cells were not in contact, they were not repressed (Fig. 12.6).

Subsequently it became clear that electrically active neurons are required. This means that neurons that are functioning normally can suppress their neighboring glial cells (and downregulate their own MHC molecules) whereas damaged neurons will lift the local immunosuppression to allow an immune response to develop.

Neurons can also act on microglia, which are resident mononuclear phagocytes of the CNS. The molecular mechanisms that underlie the suppressive activity of neurons include:

Immunosuppressive cytokines regulate immunity in the normal CNS

Observations of immune reactions in the CNS have led to the view that TH1-type immune responses with macrophage activation are generally most damaging, as are responses mediated by IL-17-secreting T cells (TH17 cells). By comparison TH2-type immune responses are generally less damaging, and strains of animals that make strong autoantibody responses against CNS antigens, are often less susceptible to CNS pathology than strains that make weaker antibody responses. Certainly, the production of IL-12, IL-23, and TNFα are associated with damaging responses in CNS. Interestingly IFNγ appears to have a dual role, involved in the acute-phase of CNS inflammation, but also necessary for the recovery phase (Fig. 12.7). Such observations have led to the view that immune deviation (the switching of an immune response from TH1 towards a TH2 type) can be protective in the CNS (see Fig. 11.2).

This view is supported by findings that cells of the normal CNS can produce cytokines associated with TH2 responses. For example, astrocytes produce TGF-β, while microglia can produce IL-10 when cocultured with T cells, and both astrocytes and neurons secrete prostaglandins, which inhibit lymphocyte activation. Additionally, several neuropeptides and transmitters (e.g. vaso-active intestinal peptide, VIP) are suppressive. Acute immune responses can develop in the CNS, particularly in susceptible strains, but the normal immunosuppresive controls usually reassert themselves within 1–2 weeks, causing remission. Such a relapsing-remitting pattern of disease occurs in multiple sclerosis and the animal model of CNS inflammation, CREAE (chronic relapsing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis) (Fig. 12.8).

Immune reactions in CNS damage oligodendrocytes

Oligodendrocytes are glial cells that produce the myelin sheaths which act as electrical insulation around nerve axons. When immune reactions occur in the CNS these cells appear to be particularly vulnerable (Fig. 12.9). For example, multiple sclerosis is characterized by focal areas of myelin loss called plaques, typically a few millimeters in diameter. Nerve transmission through these demyelinated areas is seriously impaired, which may cause disease symptoms – weakness and loss of sensation. But it is only in the later stages of the disease that the neurons themselves are damaged.

The reason that oligodendrocytes are vulnerable in multiple sclerosis is less clear. It is possible that they are most readily damaged, because they normally maintain very large amounts of plasma-membrane forming the myelin sheath. Another theory suggests that they are particularly susceptible to damage by serum molecules (e.g. complement), which leak into the CNS as a result of blood–brain barrier breakdown. Many researchers consider that they are targeted by autoantibodies which allow macrophages and activated microglia to recognize them, and that release of reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates from the phagocytes then damage the myelin.image

Immune reactions in the eye

The eye is a complex organ and subject to immune privilege. Indeed the retina and optic nerve are extensions of the CNS, with neurons, glia, and a blood–retinal barrier, which is analagous to the blood–brain barrier (Fig. 12.w1). Also, like the CNS, the eye lacks a conventional lymphatic drainage system.

The eye has powerful immunosuppressive mechanisms

Allogeneic corneal grafting is usually successful as a result of immune privelege, although rejection may occur – the eye has very limited self-regenerative capacity and can be completely destroyed by a cell-mediated immune response with the concomitant local production of TNFα and IFNγ (see Fig. 12.w1). The eye has therefore evolved several major mechanisms to actively suppress cell-mediated responses.

These cytokine and molecular controls on immunity are underpinned by the cellular organization of the eye, which has barriers that limit the movement of molecules into the retina, anterior chamber, and vitreous (Fig. 12.w2). As with the CNS, it is the combination of immunosuppressive and tolerogenic mechanisms which normally maintains immune privelege in the eye.

Immune responses in the gut and lung

In contrast to the CNS, the gut and lung are examples of tissues that are continuously in contact with high levels of harmless commensal organisms and innocuous antigens as well as potential pathogens. Mucosal tissues contain a high proportion of the body’s lymphoid tissues, but the responses in these tissues are concerned not just with whether an immune response takes place, but also on the quality of that response. Antigens introduced orally tend to invoke an immune response that is appropriate for the gut and other mucosal surfaces, namely the production of local IgA, and some systemic IgG (Fig. 12.10). There is generally little production of TH1 cells or CTLs, and no cell-mediated immune response.

It is essential that the immune system in the gut does not make strong immune responses against the enormous load of antigens in food, or harmless commensal bacteria. Similarly, many airborne antigens (e.g. pollen) are harmless, and a strong immune response in the lung is inappropriate i.e., it would be considered hypersensitivity.

The gut immune system tolerates many antigens but reacts to pathogens

There are many examples, where an individual encounters an antigen in food, and subsequently becomes tolerant to it – they do not make an immune response when the antigen is subsequently given in an immunogenic form. This phenomenon is called oral tolerance and it is related to nasal tolerance where antigen delivered to nasal mucosa as an aerosol inhibits subsequent immunization.

Oral tolerance, and the related phenomenon of nasal tolerance, illustrate two points:

Tolerance is not the only form of immunity that arises from ingestion of antigens. Oral vaccination has been recognized since 1919 when Besredka noticed that rabbits were protected from fatal dysentery by oral immunization with killed shigellae. The attenuated polio vaccine that was developed in the 1950s was also given as an oral vaccination. In both cases these vaccines are not viewed as harmless antigens by the immune system:

Gut enterocytes influence the local immune response

Intestinal epithelial cells (enterocytes) are the major cell-type forming the epithelium of the gut. These cells have continuous tight junctions and thus form a barrier to prevent antigens from entering the body. The enterocytes of the gut considerably influence the local immune response by secreting a variety of immunomodulatory factors such as TGFβ, VIP, IL-1, IL-6, IL-7, CXCL8, and CCL3. The Paneth cells at the bottoms of the crypts meanwhile produce several natural antibiotic peptides (Fig. 12.11), which help prevent bacterial overgrowth in these sensitive sites of cellular differentiation.

Intra-epithelial cells (IEL) and some dendritic cells are located in the epithelial layer and enterocytes may promote their migration. More lymphocytes and phagocytes are found in the lamina propria, which lies beneath the epithelium.

By expressing Ecadherin, a ligand for αEβ7-integrin, and by secreting TGFβ, which upregulates the expression of αEβ7, enterocytes may provide a signal for the selective accumulation of IELs that express this integrin. In this way, the tissue cells invite the residency of cells that promote certain types of immunity and aid in repair.

The major areas of gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) include the Peyer’s patches in the small intestine, the lymphoid follicles throughout the gut, and the mesenteric lymph nodes which receive lymph draining from the intestinal villi and the other lymphoid tissues (see Fig. 2.53). It is worth noting that food antigens are primarily present in the small intestine, whereas bacterial antigens are more prevalent in the large intestine.

IELs produce many immunomodulatory cytokines

Tolerance to food antigens depends on a variety of overlapping mechanisms, but the production of TGFβ and IL-10 are particularly important. For example, IL-10 knockout mice develop colitis, if they contact appropriate triggering micro-organisms and in humans, IL-10 is a susceptibility locus for ulcerative colitis. TGFβ is an important element in the TH2 spectrum of cytokines and also induces FoxP3 in naive T cells, thus promoting development of regulatory T cells. Tregs, which are abundant in the lamina propria also produce IL-10 and TGFβ, which further limit inflammatory reactions in the gut (Fig. 12.12). It is not clear exactly how Tregs are stimulated within the gut; they express high levels of TLRs, particularly TLR2, 4, and 8, so they can respond to the high potential load of MAMPs, but they clearly respond differently to APCs and effector CD4+ T cells.

When immune responses develop in the gut, IELs can produce IL-1, lymphotoxin (LT), IFNγ, and TNFα, so a switch in the balance of pro-inflammatory cytokines and regulatory cytokines in the epithelium and lamina propria occurs when damaging immune reactions develop in the gut.

Many IELs have an activated or memory phenotype and recognize the ancient conserved MHC class I-like molecules, MICA and MICB, which are upregulated by cellular stress. When activated by MICA and MICB some of the mucosa-associated lymphocytes secrete epidermal cell growth factor (ECGF) and may therefore function to repair and renew damaged intestinal epithelial cells.

Hence, by expressing molecules, the tissue cells can activate their local resident lymphocytes regardless of the specific antigen that is the target of the immune response. In this way the tissue can influence local immunity against many different antigens.

Immune responses in the lung

The lung is another example of a tissue that is in normal contact with external antigens, and pathogens, including bacteria from the upper airways. Particles trapped in the trachea and on the bronchial mucosa are propelled upwards on the ciliary escalator, and this considerably reduces the antigen load reaching the lung. Bronchioles and alveoli contain large numbers of pulmonary macrophages, while the lung tissue also contains lymphocytes and respiratory (plasmacytoid) dendritic cells (pDCs) (Fig. 12.w4). The macrophages and pDCs are major sources of IFNα, and IFNβ, which are particularly important in controlling the initial spread of viral infections.

Early recruitment of leukocytes to the lung is mediated by chemokines secreted by the macrophages, pDCs and the epithelial cells of the lung itself (pneumocytes). Neutrophils and NK cells are the first cells to appear after infection, while dendritic cells traffic to the local bronchus associated lymphoid tissue (BALT). Migration of the dendritic cells normally occurs at a steady rate, but following infection there is an increase in movement of pDCs to the lymphoid tissues and they increase their expression of MHC class-II and costimulatory molecules B7 and CD40.

The stucture of BALT resembles that of other encapsulated lymphoid tissues, with distinct T and B cell areas, and high endothelial venules and the migration of the pDCs to the local lymph nodes depends on signaling from CCL21 acting on CCR7, as in other tissues.

In viral infections of the lung, the early recruitment of NK cells, which recognize virus-infected cells via NCR1, helps control the spread of the infection, until the later arrival of CD4+ and CD8+ effector T-cells; CD8+ CTLs recognize and destroy virally-infected pneumocytes using Fas/FasL, and by releasing granzymes and perforin.

In bacterial infections, neutrophils and macrophages are prevalent in the bronchi (bronchitis) or the alveoli (pneumonia), and the smaller air-spaces fill with a fluid exudate that leaks through the damaged pulmonary epithelium.

Immune reactions in the skin

The skin is the largest organ of the body, and in humans there may be up to 106 T cells/cm2, in the dermis, tissue macrophages and at least two major populations of dendritic cells, the Langerhans’ cells in the epidermis and the plasmacytoid dendritic cells, mostly in the dermis. T cells constitute the major cell type present both in normal skin and in immune reactions (Fig. 12.13). They are characterized by a skin-homing marker CLA (cutaneous lymphocyte antigen) and the chemokine receptors CCR4 and CCR6; CCR4 recognizes CCL5 (RANTES) which is strongly expressed by dermal endothelium (see Fig. 12.2). CLA is a sialylated molecule that binds to ELAM-1 (endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule-1), a lectin-like molecule that is strongly expressed on endothelium in the skin. CLA+ lymphocytes also express high levels of receptors for IL-12 and IL-2 and the chemokine receptor CXCR3, which recognizes IFNγ-induced chemokines. This can explain why active immune responses in skin are characterized by a TH1-type immune response, with high expression of IFNγ and low IL-4. However, as inflammation subsides, there is an increase in IL-4 production and a shift towards a TH2-type response. An outline of the intiation and effector phases of immune responses in the skin (type-IV hypersensitivity) are shown in Figures 26.4–26.7. Immune reactions in skin are also seen in psoriasis and mycosis fungoides, both with strong T cell infiltration.

The cells of the tissue also contribute to the development of the immune response. Keratinocytes, which form the epidermis, express high levels of IL-1, which may be released when the skin is damaged, to promote inflammation and repair. Fibroblasts in the dermis respond to TNFα by releasing IL-15, which activates effector T cells as an immune response develops, and induces Tregs during the resolution phase.

Conclusions

The immune responses and inflammatory reactions that occur in each tissue are distinctive, and are directed by interactions between the endothelial chemokines and adhesion molecules and the circulating leukocytes. The endothelium in each tissue synthesizes distinct sets of chemokines, and expresses specific adhesion molecules, which attracts distinct leukocyte subsets. In the CNS and the skin, TH1-type immune responses are favored, whereas TH2-type responses predominate in mucosal tissues. The type of immune response may switch within individual tissues as the reaction resolves, although this is very much dependent on the inducing antigen, and the immune status of the individual. In tissues with barrier properties, the endothelium also limits entrance of immunoglobulins and serum molecules and the movement of cytokines from cells in the tissue to the blood. Consequently vascular endothelium and the resident cells of the tissue play a central role in determining the characteristics of the inflammatory response in each tissue.