Imaging of the Central Nervous System

Published on 14/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Emergency Medicine

Last modified 14/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 5188 times

74 Imaging of the Central Nervous System

Perspective

Imaging of the central nervous system (CNS) has assumed a critical role in the practice of emergency medicine for the evaluation of intracranial emergencies, both traumatic and atraumatic. A number of studies have revealed a deficiency in the ability of emergency physicians (EPs) to interpret head computed tomography (CT) scans.16 However, a number of these same studies also show that with even brief educational effort, EPs can gain considerable proficiency in cranial CT scan interpretation.2,3 This is important because in many situations the EP must interpret and act on head CT results in real time without assistance from other specialists such as neurologists, radiologists, or neuroradiologists.7,8 Advantages of using these technologies for diagnosing CNS pathology in the emergency department (ED) include widespread availability at many institutions, speed of imaging, patient accessibility, and sensitivity in detecting many emergency pathologic processes.

Computed Tomography

Artifact

CT of the brain is subject to a few predictable artifactual effects that can potentially inhibit the ability to accurately interpret the images. Besides motion and metal artifact (self-explanatory), the two most common effects are called beam hardening and volume averaging. It is important to understand these artifactual effects and to be able to identify them because they can mimic pathology, as well as obscure actual significant findings.

Beam hardening is a phenomenon that causes an abnormal signal when a relatively small amount of hypodense brain tissue is immediately adjacent to dense bone. The posterior fossa, where extremely dense bone surrounds the brain, is particularly subject to this phenomenon. It appears as either linear hyperdensities or hypodensities that can partially obscure the brainstem and cerebellum. Although beam hardening can be reduced with appropriate filtering, it cannot be eliminated.

Volume averaging (also called partial volume artifact) arises when the imaged area contains different types of tissue (e.g., bone and brain). For that particular image unit, the CT pixel produced will represent an average density for all the structures contained within it. In the instance of brain and bone, an intermediate density will be represented that may have the appearance of blood. As with beam hardening, certain techniques can minimize this type of artifact (e.g., thinner slices, computer algorithms), but it cannot be eliminated, particularly in the posterior fossa.

Normal Neuroanatomy As Seen On Head Computed Tomography

As with radiologic interpretation of any body part, working knowledge of normal anatomic structures and location is fundamental to the clinician’s ability to detect pathologic variants. Paramount in head CT interpretation is familiarity with the various CNS structures, ranging from parenchymal areas, such as the basal ganglia, to vasculature structures, cisterns, and ventricles. Additionally, knowing the neurologic function of these regions of the brain helps when correlating CT results with findings on physical examination.

Although detailed knowledge of cranial neuroanatomy and its CT appearance is clearly in the realm of the neuroradiologist, familiarity with a relatively few structures, regions, and expected findings allows sufficient interpretation of most head CT scans by the EP. Figures 74.2 through 74.5 demonstrate key structures of a normal head CT scan.

Identifying Central Nervous System Pathology On Cranial Computed Tomography

As long as one is systematic in the search for pathology, any number of techniques can be used when reviewing head CT images. Some recommend a “center-out” technique in which the examiner starts from the middle of the brain and works outward. Others advocate a “problem-oriented” approach in which the clinical history directs the examiner to a particular portion of the scan. In the author’s experience, both these approaches are of limited utility to clinicians who do not frequently review scans. A preferred method, one that has been demonstrated to work in the ED, is to use the mnemonic “blood can be very bad” (Box 74.2).2 In this mnemonic, the first letter of each word prompts the clinician to search a certain portion of the CT scan for pathology.

Box 74.2 The “Blood Can Be Very Bad” Mnemonic*

Blood—Acute hemorrhage appears hyperdense (bright white) on computed tomography. The globin molecule is relatively dense and effectively absorbs x-ray beams. As the blood ages, the globin molecule breaks down and loses its hyperdense appearance, beginning at the periphery. Precise localization of the blood is as important as identification of its presence.

Cisterns—Cerebrospinal fluid collections in the brain. The four key cisterns must be examined for blood, asymmetry, and effacement (representing increased intracranial pressure):

Brain—Examine for:

Ventricles—Pathologic processes cause dilation (hydrocephalus) or compression or shifting; hydrocephalus is usually first evident with dilation of the temporal horns (normally small and slitlike); the examiner must assess the “whole picture” to determine whether the ventricles are enlarged because of lack of brain tissue or increased cerebrospinal fluid pressure.

Buy Membership for Emergency Medicine Category to continue reading. Learn more here