Hemodynamic Monitoring

Published on 10/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Critical Care Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 7768 times

Chapter 6 Hemodynamic Monitoring

3 How are arterial lines calibrated, and what factors affect readings?

Arterial lines generate blood pressure readings using pressure transducers. To yield useful information, the transducers must first be zeroed and leveled (positioned appropriately). Second, the system should be monitored for damping and resonance.

Zeroing and leveling eliminate the effects of atmospheric pressure and hydrostatic pressure, respectively, on blood pressure readings. Atmospheric pressures are set to zero so that reported values are relative pressures. If the system is not zeroed appropriately, measurements will continuously offset by a fixed amount. Errors can also occur if the transducer is physically lowered so that it will read a higher pressure and vice versa (potential energy is replaced by pressure to maintain energy in the fluid; read about Bernoulli’s equation for more). Therefore it is crucial to position the transducer at the height of interest (e.g., external acoustic meatus to approximate pressure at the circle of Willis).

Damping is the tendency of an oscillating system to decrease oscillation amplitude. In the case of an arterial line, the systolic and diastolic readings tend to converge around the mean pressure. Damping results from medium or large air bubbles in the circuit, compliant tubing between the transducer and cannulation site, loose connections, or kinks. Resonance or whip causes falsely increased systolic readings and falsely decreased diastolic readings. It occurs when the system’s frequency of oscillation (i.e., heart rate) matches the system’s natural frequency of vibration causing whip in the signal. The classic example of this (though not easy to accomplish) is breaking a wine glass by singing a note of the same frequency as the wine glass’s resonant frequency.

20 Is it possible to look more directly at tissue perfusion?

Many methods to assess tissue perfusion (the ultimate gauge of adequate hemodynamics) have been and are being developed. Although many more exist than are covered in this chapter, some include

Bibliography

1 Brennan J., Blair J., Goonewardena S., et al. Reappraisal of the use of inferior vena cava for estimating right atrial pressure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20:857–861.

2 Chatterjee K. The Swan-Ganz catheters: past, present and future: a viewpoint. Circulation. 2009;119:147–152.

3 Cholley B., Payen D. Noninvasive techniques for measurements of cardiac output. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005;11:424–429.

4 Isakow W., Shuster D. Extravascular lung water measurements and hemodynamic monitoring in the critically ill: bedside alternatives to the pulmonary artery catheter. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2006;291:1118–1131.

5 Jensen M., Sloth E., Larsen K., et al. Transthoracic echocardiography for cardiopulmonary monitoring in intensive care. Eur J Anesthesiol. 2004;21:700–707.

6 Karamanoglu M., O’Rourke M., Avolio A., et al. An analysis of the relationship between central aortic and peripheral upper limb pressure waves in man. Eur Heart J. 1993;14:160–167.

7 Monnet X., Rienzo M., Osman D. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1402–1407.

8 Munis J., Lozada L. Giraffes, siphons and starling resistors: cerebral perfusion pressure revisited. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2000;12:290–296.

9 Pittman J., Ping J., Mark J. Arterial and central venous pressure monitoring. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2004;42:13–30.

10 Seneff M. Arterial line placement and care. In: Irwin R.S., Rippe J.M. Irwin and Rippe’s Intensive Care Medicine. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008:36–45.