Hemodynamic Instability and Resuscitation

Published on 13/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Cardiothoracic Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 2 (4 votes)

This article have been viewed 5754 times

Chapter 20 Hemodynamic Instability and Resuscitation

Hemodynamic instability refers to abnormalities of heart rate, blood pressure, filling pressures, or cardiac output that if uncorrected result in organ dysfunction. Hemodynamic instability is common in the intensive care unit (ICU) and encompasses a range of clinical states, from cardiac arrest to subtle tissue hypoperfusion. When hemodynamic instability is obvious and severe, timely intervention may be lifesaving. Equally important is the early recognition and treatment of slowly evolving or subclinical tissue hypoperfusion which, untreated, may progress to organ failure.

This chapter is divided into three sections: (1) postoperative hypertension; (2) hypotension and low cardiac output; (3) cardiac arrest and near cardiac arrest. Relevant physiology and pharmacology are discussed in Chapters 1 and Chapter 3, respectively; echocardiography is reviewed in Chapter 7; and hemodynamic monitoring is discussed in Chapter 8.

POSTOPERATIVE HYPERTENSION

Hypertension occurs because of increased systemic vascular resistance, increased cardiac output, or both (see Eq. 1-5). With increased systemic resistance, diastolic, systolic, and mean arterial pressures (MAP) are all increased. With increased stroke volume, diastolic pressure is usually normal or low, and pulse pressure is high. Postoperative hypertension has a number of causes (Table 20-1), but in most cases the primary problem is increased systemic vascular resistance. Surgical stress, hypothermia, patient anxiety, and inadequate analgesia lead to activation of the sympathetic nervous and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone systems. Essential hypertension is common and routine antihypertensive medications may have been withheld during the perioperative period.

Table 20-1 Etiology of Hypertension Following Cardiac Surgery

Common Causes of Hypertension Following Cardiac Surgery
Pain
Anxiety (including paralysis combined with inadequate sedation)
Withdrawal of usual oral antihypertensive treatment (particularly β blockers)
Inappropriate vasopressor therapy
Hypervolemia
Hypothermia
Shivering
Patient-ventilator dysynchrony
Poorly controlled essential hypertension
Uncommon Causes of Hypertension Associated With Cardiac Surgery
Myocardial ischemia or infarction
Acute left ventricular failure
Drug treatment (corticosteroids, cyclosporine)
Coarctation of the aorta
Aortic dissection
Intracranial catastrophe
Uncommon Causes of Hypertension not Associated With Cardiac Surgery
Renal disease (including renal artery stenosis, end-stage renal disease, glomerulonephritis, etc.)
Endocrine dysfunction (including primary hyperaldosteronism, Cushing syndrome, pheochromocytoma, renin-producing tumor)
Toxemia of pregnancy
Arteritis

Elevated systemic vascular resistance results in increased left ventricular afterload, which can lead to reduced stroke volume, especially in patients with impaired left ventricular function. Thus, hypertension may be associated with low cardiac output and tissue hypoperfusion. Hypertension can precipitate myocardial ischemia, arrhythmias, and pulmonary edema. It can exacerbate or precipitate mediastinal bleeding and can occasionally cause dehiscence of arterial suture lines, with potentially catastrophic results. Profound hypertension (diastolic pressure >140 to 150 mmHg) can cause cerebral edema or precipitate an intracerebral bleed, but such events are rare; hypertension is more likely to result from, rather than cause, raised intracranial pressure.

The definition of hypertension is arbitrary and must take into account a patient’s individual circumstances. For instance, in a postoperative patient who is bleeding, a MAP above 80 to 90 mmHg probably warrants pharmacologic treatment. By contrast, a patient who has essential hypertension several days after surgery and has evolving renal dysfunction may benefit from a MAP above 90 mmHg. A sustained MAP above 120 to 130 mmHg always warrants intervention.

Before antihypertensive drugs are given, the common causes of postoperative hypertension (see Table 20-1) should be considered and corrected. Clinicians must also assess the patient’s intravascular volume status and cardiac output (see subsequent discussion).

For intravenous antihypertensive therapy, vasodilators such as nitroglycerin, nicardipine, and nitroprusside are an attractive first choice because in patients with elevated systemic vascular resistance, they maintain or augment cardiac output. However, nitroglycerin may be ineffective in treating severe hypertension, and nitroprusside can cause marked hypotension, reflex tachycardia, and hypoxemia. Nesiritide may be considered when circulating volume is increased and filling pressures are high. If cardiac output is low, an inodilating drug such as milrinone is a good choice. Fluid loading may have to accompany vasodilating and inodilating drugs.

Intravenous metoprolol or diltiazem are good choices when hypertension is accompanied by tachycardia, but they must be used cautiously in the presence of impaired cardiac function. Labetalol, a combined α and β blocker, may be preferable to a pure β blocker in this circumstance.

Once a patient is able to take oral medications, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (e.g., amlodipine or felodipine) or an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (e.g., cilazapril or quinapril) may be substituted for intravenous vasodilators. Oral formulations of metoprolol or diltiazem may be substituted for intravenous formulations.

For resistant hypertension, combining a vasodilator and a β blocker is helpful. When hypertension is associated with central nervous system agitation or opioid withdrawal, clonidine or dexmedetomidine may be considered.

HYPOTENSION AND LOW CARDIAC OUTPUT

Recognizing and Treating Hemodynamic Instability

Severe hemodynamic instability is usually obvious, but identifying subtle derangements in cardiovascular function can be difficult.

Hypotension

Sustained hypotension below the lower limit of blood flow autoregulation leads to organ dysfunction. However, autoregulatory limits vary from patient to patient and organ to organ and are altered by disease. The autoregulatory range is set to a higher level in chronic hypertension but may disappear entirely with critical illness, in which case organ blood flow becomes pressure dependent. However, if MAP is maintained at the expense of cardiac output, organ hypoperfusion may occur despite adequate blood pressure.

There are limited data concerning what constitutes an ideal blood pressure in critically ill patients. In one study of patients with septic shock, increasing MAP from 65 to 85 mmHg with norepinephrine did not improve markers of tissue perfusion or renal function.1 In the absence of similar studies in cardiac surgical patients, a target MAP of more than 65 mmHg is a reasonable goal for most patients. Suggested blood pressure targets in different groups of cardiac surgery patients are listed in Table 20-2.

Table 20-2 Blood Pressure Targets in the First 48 Hours Following Cardiac Surgery

Normal (MAP >65 mmHg)
Default blood pressure goal
High (MAP >75-85 mmHg)
Age >75 years
Multiple arterial grafts
Preoperative or evolving renal impairment
Poorly controlled hypertension
History of ischemic stroke
New neurologic deficit postoperatively
Significant uncorrected carotid stenoses
Low (MAP >55-60 mmHg)
Age <50 years with no history of hypertension
High bleeding risk
Low blood pressure preoperatively with normal renal function
Valve surgery for chronically regurgitant valve lesions

MAP, mean arterial pressure.

Low Cardiac Output and Tissue Hypoperfusion

Unlike blood pressure, cardiac output is not routinely measured in all patients, and clinicians often rely on clinical and biochemical markers of tissue hypoperfusion (Table 20-3). Unfortunately, clinical assessment of cardiac output is unreliable in the first few hours after cardiac surgery.2 Cool peripheries are normal findings. Polyuria is common, even with evolving renal dysfunction. Tachycardia may be absent due to the inhibitory effects of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and surgery on the cardiac conducting system. Lactic acidosis is suggestive of tissue hypoperfusion, but other causes (e.g., β2-agonist drugs; see Table 31-3) may be responsible. Not uncommonly, low cardiac output occurs in the absence of lactic acidosis. A useful screening tool for low cardiac output is the oxygen saturation of blood drawn from the proximal port of a central venous catheter (i.e., from the superior vena cava; SSVCO2), which provides a close approximation of a true mixed venous oxygen saturation SVO2.3 Values above 65% are reassuring; values below 55% warrant further investigation. Other findings that demand further investigations include escalating inotropic support, a central venous pressure (CVP) above 15 mmHg, and unexplained metabolic acidosis (lactate >5 mmol/l, base deficit >6).

Table 20-3 Clinical and Biochemical Signs Consistent with Inadequate Cardiac Output

Clinical
Cool, clammy peripheries
Sweating
Central hyperthermia
Oliguria with concentrated urine
Sinus tachycardia and atrial fibrillation
Narrow pulse pressure
Biochemical
Metabolic acidosis
Elevated lactate
Hyperkalemia
Low SVO2 or SSVCO2

SSVCO2, superior vena cava oxygen saturation; SVO2, mixed venous oxygen saturation.

If low cardiac output is suspected—and the cause is not readily apparent on the basis of routine clinical assessment—cardiac output should be measured. Numerous devices may be used (see Chapter 8), but in cardiac surgery units, the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) is the device most commonly employed. A PAC also allows measurement of pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP), and SVO2. As with blood pressure, the normal value for cardiac output is ill defined. By convention, a lower limit of 2.2 l/min/m2 is widely used; however, many “well” cardiac surgery patients have values below this figure.2 Also, the appropriate cardiac output depends on the patient’s metabolic state. Thus, in a patient with a marked systemic inflammatory response to CPB, a cardiac output of 4 l/min/m2 may be appropriate, whereas in a sedated, mildly hypothermic patient, a value of 2 l/min/m2 may be satisfactory. As a simple guide, if filling pressures are normal (PAWP <15 mmHg, CVP <12 mmHg), and venous oxygen saturation is satisfactory (>65%), a cardiac output as low as 1.8 l/min/m2 is probably acceptable.

Diagnosis and Treatment

Causes of hemodynamic instability in the early postoperative period are listed in Table 20-4. A stepwise approach to the diagnosis and initial treatment of hemodynamic instability is provided in Table 20-5. Important diagnostic clues can be obtained from the patient’s history and intraoperative course. The operation notes, angiograms, and echocardiograms should be reviewed. Examination should focus on the cardiovascular system, in particular the presence of any new murmurs. Specific diagnoses may be suggested on the basis of the electrocardiogram (ECG), CVP, and arterial pressure waveforms (see Chapter 8). If the ECG trace is abnormal, 12-lead and atrial ECGs should be obtained. Respiratory problems can cause hemodynamic instability, and a careful respiratory system examination, including checking the ventilator circuit and settings, should be performed. Chest drain bottles should be inspected for blood loss and bubbling. Important trends may be identified on the 24-hour ICU chart. Further blood tests, such as arterial blood gases, complete blood count, coagulation status, and troponin may be indicated, depending on the circumstances. Chest radiographs should be reviewed.

Table 20-4 Causes of Hemodynamic Instability in the Early Period Following Cardiac Surgery

Common Uncommon
Patient-ventilator dysynchrony Severe mitral regurgitation
Hypovolemia Other valvular pathology
Low systemic vascular resistance Dynamic LVOT obstruction
Left ventricular systolic dysfunction Dynamic lung hyperinflation
Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction Tension pneumothorax
Right ventricular dysfunction Massive hemothorax
Pericardial compression (tamponade)  
Rhythm disturbance  

LVOT, left ventricular outflow tract.

Table 20-5 A Stepwise Approach to the Diagnosis and Initial Treatment of the Hemodynamically Unstable Postoperative Cardiac Patient

Step 1. Confirm the Presence of Hemodynamic Instability.
Check the level and zero all transducers. Relevel and rezero all pressure transducers if necessary.
Check all infusion pumps and the integrity of all infusion lines.
Step 2. Does the Patient Have an Immediately Life-threatening Problem (i.e., MAP < 50 mmHg)?
If so, go to Fig. 20-3.
Step 3. Clinically Assess the Patient (Steps 3 and 4 Should Occur Simultaneously).
Perform a targeted physical exam, concentrating on the cardiac and respiratory systems, the ventilator, and the chest drains.
Review the 24-hour chart.
Obtain relevant investigations: blood gases, SSVCO2, ECG (atrial and 12-lead), and chest radiograph.
Review the old notes and the intraoperative course.
Inform the surgeon.
Step 4. Consider the Following Interventions.
Paralyze and sedate the patient and ventilate with 100% oxygen. If indicated, disconnect the patient from the ventilator and hand ventilate with a manual resuscitator.
Pace the heart at 90 beats/min using DDD or DOO mode at maximum output (see Chapter 21).
Administer a fluid challenge of 500 ml of a crystalloid (e.g., normal saline or Plasma-Lyte).
Commence or increase inotropic support.
Step 5. If the Diagnosis Remains Uncertain, Insert a PAC and/or Perform an Echocardiogram.
If there is clinical suspicion of low or high cardiac output, a PAC should be inserted.
If a PAC is in place and cardiac output is low, an echocardiogram should be performed.
If the patient remains hypotensive and the cause is unclear, an echocardiogram should be performed.
If a specific diagnosis (e.g., tamponade) is suspected clinically, an echocardiogram should be performed.

ECG, electrocardiogram; MAP, mean arterial pressure; PAC, pulmonary artery catheter.

If the cause of hypotension or low cardiac output is not rapidly apparent, an echocardiogram should be performed. Pulmonary artery catheterization and echocardiography are complementary techniques: a PAC is preferred for measuring cardiac output, whereas an echocardiogram is preferred for diagnosing the cause of low cardiac output and hypotension. In the ICU, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) offers significant advantages over transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) (see Chapter 7).

Hypovolemia

Hypovolemia is a reduction in circulating blood volume such that left ventricular preload is inadequate to optimize cardiac output (see Chapter 1). Preload is usually equated with left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), but surrogates such as left ventricular end-diastolic area (LVEDA), PAWP, and CVP are also used.

In the general ICU environment, approximately 50% of hypotensive patients are fluid responsive.4 Hypovolemia is common following cardiac surgery, as a consequence of blood, urinary, and third-space fluid losses. Blood loss may be visible (seen in the chest drains) or occult (unseen in the chest, retroperitoneum, or gastrointestinal tract). Urinary losses may be substantial in the first few hours following surgery, particularly if hypothermic CPB has been employed or mannitol has been used in the circuit prime. Third-space losses are variable but may involve several liters. In one study, the average weight gain after cardiac surgery was 7.2% of body weight on the first postoperative day.5 Thus, hypovolemia can occur despite a substantial increase in total extracellular volume. In critically unwell patients, hypovolemia and systemic edema often coexist.

Diagnosis

Hypovolemia is usually obvious on the basis of clinical signs and invasive hemodynamic monitoring. However, in certain situations the clinical picture is confusing. Young patients with intact cardiovascular reflexes can have important hypovolemia without showing clinical indicators, whereas modest hypovolemia can cause profound hypotension in elderly patients who are mechanically ventilated and have blunted sympathetic tone. Hypovolemia frequently coexists with other causes of hemodynamic instability, complicating the diagnosis. The surrogates of preload, CVP and pawp, are often misleading (see Chapters 1 and Chapter 8).

Hemodynamic Monitoring.

Hypovolemia is normally characterized by hypotension in association with low atrial pressures. A patient with a CVP below 8 mmHg or a PAWP below 10 mmHg, in the presence of hypotension, is invariably fluid responsive. However, there are no absolute values for CVP and PAWP that predict fluid responsiveness,6,7 and in many circumstances patients with much higher filling pressures also benefit from fluid administration. High CVP may be caused by right ventricular dysfunction or high intrathoracic or intrapericardial pressure. A CVP above 15 mmHg is occasionally required so as to optimize cardiac output in patients with right ventricular dysfunction.4,6 Conversely, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, CVP may be low despite circulatory overload. In cases of severe left ventricular hypertrophy, PAWP may have to be above 18 mmHg to optimize preload.4 The causes of high CVP and PAWP are listed in Tables 8-3 and 8-4, respectively.

In contrast to absolute values of CVP and PAWP, respiratory fluctuations in CVP and the arterial pressure waveform (pulsus paradoxus) are predictive of fluid responsiveness (see Chapter 8).4 A patient with a respiratory swing on the arterial waveform is invariably fluid responsive, irrespective of the atrial pressure.

Low Systemic Vascular Resistance

Pathologic vasodilatation after cardiac surgery is most commonly a manifestation of severe inflammatory response to CPB and surgical stress (see Chapter 2). Other causes include vasodilator drug therapy, anaphylaxis, sepsis, and adrenal failure. Low systemic resistance occurs in 20% to 45% of patients after cardiac surgery,10,11 and severe vasodilatory shock occurs in 5% to 10%.11,12 Risk factors for pathologic vasodilatation include low ejection fraction, prolonged CPB, and prior treatment with ACE inhibitors.

Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

Left ventricular systolic dysfunction may be acute, chronic, or a combination of both.

Chronic

Chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction results in remodeling (see Chapter 1), usually as a consequence of myocardial infarction, chronic ischemia (hibernating myocardium), or valvular heart disease. Ejection fraction is reduced and ventricular volumes are increased. A patient with compensated heart failure may have a normal cardiac output and left atrial pressure and, despite a low ejection fraction, may have good functional capacity. Such a patient often has an uneventful postoperative course. However, decompensation may occur if: (1) there is a further myocardial insult (e.g., myocardial stunning); (2) ventricular afterload is abruptly increased (e.g., after tracheal extubation or the withholding of usual vasodilator therapy); (3) there is a requirement for increased cardiac output (e.g., a severe inflammatory response to CPB).

Acute

Acute left ventricular systolic dysfunction occurs due to myocardial ischemia, acute infarction, myocardial stunning, drugs (e.g., β blockers), or systemic inflammation. Some degree of myocardial stunning occurs in all patients after cardiac surgery.14 However, severe postoperative stunning is likely when: (1) CPB is complicated or greatly prolonged; (2) severe myocardial ischemia was present preoperatively. With acute dysfunction, ejection fraction is reduced but ventricular volumes may be relatively normal. Cardiac output is reduced, left atrial pressure is increased, and there may be signs of pulmonary congestion and tissue hypoperfusion.

Myocardial ischemia must always be considered in any patient who develops new left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The patients at the highest risk for myocardial ischemia are those undergoing coronary revascularization (see Chapter 9), but ischemia can also occur in other situations, namely, the obstruction of a coronary ostium during aortic valve replacement; the kinking or obstruction of a coronary artery following its reimplantation during aortic root replacement; damage to the circumflex coronary artery during mitral valve surgery; and damage to the septal branch of the left anterior descending coronary artery as it runs in front of the pulmonary valve during the Ross procedure (see Chapter 10).

Diagnosis

Echocardiography.

With chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction, ventricular dimensions are increased, systolic wall movement and thickening are reduced, and ejection fraction is low. Because of the effects of remodeling, changes in wall motion are typically global (in addition to any segmental wall motion abnormalities secondary to ischemia and infarction).

With acute dysfunction, ventricular volumes may be relatively normal. Changes in wall motion are typically regional rather than global. The left atrium may appear tense and enlarged and may show rightward bowing of the interatrial septum. With tissue Doppler, the E deceleration time is likely to be short (<140 ms) and the E:Em ratio is likely to be high (<15; see Chapter 7).

When grading systolic function by echocardiography, the effects of loading conditions (e.g., systemic vascular resistance, mitral regurgitation) and inotropic support must be considered (see Difficult Diagnoses in subsequent material). If systolic dysfunction is identified on the echocardiogram, the following questions should be asked to help determine whether it is the primary cause of the observed hemodynamic instability:

The diagnosis of postoperative myocardial ischemia rests on clinical suspicion and characteristic abnormalities on the ECG, echocardiogram, and biochemical markers (see Chapters 9 and Chapter 18).

Treatment

Preload, heart rate, and rhythm should be optimized. A heart rate of 80 to 100 beats per minute, using pacing if necessary, is appropriate for most patients. Inotropic support should then be commenced and titrated to effect. The choice of drug depends on the hemodynamic state. If cardiac output is low but blood pressure is satisfactory, an inodilator such as dobutamine or milrinone may be used. If both blood pressure and cardiac output are low, epinephrine or a combination of norepinephrine and milrinone (or dobutamine) may be used. If hemodynamic instability persists despite modest inotropic support (epinephrine 0.1 to 0.2 μ/kg/min or equivalent), insertion of an intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) should be considered (see Chapter 22). In patients with systolic ventricular dysfunction, high-dose norepinephrine can cause a precipitous fall in cardiac output and should be avoided unless cardiac output is being measured.

Combinations of inotropic drugs at high dosages (e.g., norepinephrine plus milrinone; or epinephrine/dopamine plus milrinone, and vasopressin) in conjunction with an IABP are sometimes required for severe postoperative myocardial stunning, and biventricular failure. If the hemodynamic state remains inadequate despite an IABP and combination high-dosage inotropic pharmacotherapy, and cardiac dysfunction is potentially reversible, placement of a ventricular assist device should be considered (see Chapter 22).

Severe acidemia (pH ≤7.0) exacerbates ventricular dysfunction and inhibits the actions of inotropic drugs15,16; early institution of renal replacement therapy should be considered (see Chapter 33). Correction of the pH with sodium bicarbonate does not improve the hemodynamic state.17,18

Right Ventricular Dysfunction

Right ventricular dysfunction has a number of causes (Table 20-7) and accounts for about 20% of cases of circulatory failure that occur following cardiac surgery.19 There are three underlying mechanisms: (1) systolic dysfunction; (2) volume overload; and (3) pressure overload, usually caused by increased pulmonary vascular resistance. Systolic dysfunction occurs due to myocardial stunning or coronary insufficiency. Stunning may be the result of inadequate myocardial protection of the right ventricle during aortic cross clamping, such as that which may occur with a critical right coronary stenosis or when only retrograde cardioplegia is used. Right ventricular systolic dysfunction may occur due to gas or particulate emboli in the anteriorly placed right coronary artery during open-heart (i.e., valvular)surgery. Right ventricular volume overload may be chronic (e.g., due to tricuspid valve disease) or may be precipitated by iatrogenic fluid overload. Elevated pulmonary vascular resistance is common following cardiac surgery and is an important cause of right ventricular dysfunction; it is discussed in Chapter 24. In many circumstances, the cause of right ventricular dysfunction is multifactorial.

Table 20-7 Classification of Right Ventricular Dysfunction

Systolic Dysfunction
Myocardial stunning
Myocardial infarction or ischemia
Right Ventricular Volume Overload
Acute
Excess fluid administration
Chronic
Pulmonary valve regurgitation (e.g., secondary to repaired tetralogy of Fallot)
Structural tricuspid valve regurgitation (Epstein anomaly, endocarditis, rheumatic valve disease)
Atrial septal defect
Ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm
Right Ventricular Pressure Overload*
Acute
Perioperative events (mechanical ventilation and PEEP, ventilator dysynchrony, SIRS, hypoxemia, hypercarbia, acidemia)
Massive pulmonary embolus
Chronic
Chronic pulmonary disease (cor pulmonale)
Left heart disease (mitral stenosis, mitral regurgitation, end-stage aortic valve disease)
Pulmonary vascular occlusive disease (Eisenmenger syndrome, chronic pulmonary embolism, primary pulmonary hypertension)
Pulmonary valve stenosis

PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; SIRS, systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

* See Chapter 24.

The right ventricle is a thin-walled, highly compliant structure, and its primary compensatory mechanism to injury—irrespective of the cause—is dilation. Within certain limits, ventricular dilation preserves cardiac output with little change in CVP. However, progressive chamber dilation leads to deteriorating systolic function, increased CVP, functional tricuspid regurgitation, and reduced right ventricular stroke volume (i.e., falling cardiac output). Severe right ventricular dilation leads to leftward displacement of the ventricular septum, which impairs left ventricular filling.

With right ventricular dysfunction, right atrial pressure may exceed left atrial pressure which, in the presence of a patent foramen ovale, causes right-to-left shunting and hypoxemia. Unexplained hypoxemia in a patient with a normal chest radiograph and normal lung compliance raises the possibility of a patent foramen ovale, particularly if CVP is high.

Diagnosis

Right ventricular failure is manifested as a high CVP (with V waves) in association with a falling blood pressure and cardiac output. Pulmonary arterial pressure may be normal, high, or low, depending on the cause and on cardiac output. (Assuming pulmonary vascular resistance and left atrial pressure remain constant, a fall in cardiac output results in a fall in pulmonary arterial pressure; refer to Eq. 1-6.) With primary volume overload and right ventricular systolic dysfunction, pulmonary vascular resistance is not elevated; therefore, pulmonary arterial pressure is not increased. There is a small step-up in pressure between the CVP and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (<10 mmHg). By contrast, pulmonary arterial pressure is increased with pressure overload, reflecting increased pulmonary vascular resistance. The transpulmonary pressure gradient is elevated but PAWP may be normal or low.

Echocardiographic features include right ventricular dilation, impaired contractility, tricuspid regurgitation, leftward bowing of the interatrial septum, and characteristic changes in the shape and motion of the interventricular septum (see Fig. 7-15). With chronic pressure overload, right ventricular hypertrophy may be evident. With severe right ventricular dilation, the left ventricle may appear small and underfilled due to leftward displacement of the interventricular septum. In this situation, PAWP may be increased.

Treatment

Treating right ventricular dysfunction involves: (1) maintaining adequate preload; (2) maintaining right ventricular perfusion pressure; (3) reducing right ventricular afterload; and (4) augmenting contractility.

Traditionally, fluid loading has been advocated for patients with right ventricular infarction,20,21 even though there is little evidence that this strategy improves cardiac output or blood pressure.22,23 Furthermore, aggressive fluid administration reduces right ventricular perfusion pressure (by increasing right ventricular end-diastolic pressure); causes leftward displacement of the interventricular septum; and exacerbates tricuspid regurgitation. Only rarely does the CVP need to be greater than 15 mmHg.

Inotropes and vasopressors help to maintain right ventricular perfusion pressure and to augment contractility. Milrinone plus norepinephrine or dobutamine plus norepinephrine are good choices. For decompensated right ventricular pressure overload, maintaining right ventricular perfusion pressure, usually with norepinephrine, is critically important (see Chapter 24).

Afterload reduction is potentially beneficial. Simple measures such as avoidance of hypoxemia, hypercarbia, and acidemia are important. Airway pressure and PEEP should be kept as low as possible. The use of pulmonary vasodilators, such as inhaled nitric oxide, inhaled or intravenous prostacyclin, and milrinone (see Chapter 24), may reduce pulmonary vascular resistance and improve right ventricular function. However, they should be used with caution for the following reasons:

Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction

In about 35% of patients with congestive heart failure, left ventricular systolic function has been preserved.25 In most cases, impaired diastolic function is thought to be the underlying pathologic process. Risk factors for diastolic dysfunction include female gender, advanced age, diabetes, hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, coronary artery disease, and aortic stenosis.26 Preoperative factors that suggest diastolic dysfunction include a history of acute pulmonary edema, ECG evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy, and a normal (or high) ejection fraction in association with small ventricular volumes.

Abnormalities of diastole can be divided into those affecting the early, active part of diastole and those affecting the later, passive phases. Active diastolic dysfunction is due to delayed reuptake of calcium ions into the sarcoplasmic reticulum and results in prolonged relaxation, which affects isovolumetric relaxation and the first part of early filling. Passive diastolic dysfunction is due to reduced chamber compliance and affects the later parts of ventricular filling—diastasis and atrial systole.

Initially, most forms of diastolic dysfunction, such as that due to myocardial ischemia, hypertension and aortic stenosis, cause prolonged relaxation. Reduced compliance is the predominant finding in infiltrative processes (e.g., amyloidosis) and myocardial fibrosis. The natural history of diastolic dysfunction is that as the disease advances, abnormal relaxation progresses to reduced compliance.

With mild diastolic dysfunction, left atrial pressure is normal. As the disease progresses, left atrial pressure increases, first with exercise and then at rest. Following cardiac surgery, diastolic function acutely deteriorates and then recovers over 24 to 48 hours.27 In postoperative cardiac surgery patients, diastolic dysfunction is manifested as raised left atrial pressure, low or inadequate cardiac output, and preserved systolic function. The left atrial pressure at which cardiac output is optimal is higher than normal and, in fact, may be at a level at which pulmonary edema develops.

Treatment

There is no truly effective way to induce ventricular relaxation. The two goals of treatment are optimizing preload—while minimizing pulmonary congestion—and avoiding actions that worsen left ventricular filling. With a restrictive filling pattern (see Fig. 7-7), the majority of ventricular filling occurs in early diastole. Thus, modest tachycardia may improve hemodynamics. In contrast, with impaired relaxation a greater proportion of ventricular filling occurs late in diastole, and filling is more dependent than usual on atrial systole. Thus, tachycardia and loss of atrioventricular synchrony are poorly tolerated. A heart rate of 70 to 80 beats per minute may produce more favorable hemodynamics than a heart rate of 90 to 100 beats per minute. A slightly prolonged atrioventricular delay (e.g., 180 ms versus the usual 150 ms) may also augment cardiac output in patients who are sequentially paced. Atrial fibrillation and other tachyarrhythmias should be aggressively treated (see Chapter 21).

β-Adrenoreceptor agonists, by virtue of their chronotropic effect, may have an adverse effect on cardiac output. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors such as milrinone enhance early diastolic relaxation (lusitropy) by a direct myocardial action and by causing afterload reduction.28 Thus, at least theoretically, they may improve early diastolic filling in patients with impaired relaxation; whether this effect is clinically important in the setting of normal systolic function and raised left atrial pressure is unknown. Probably the major benefit of milrinone in patients with impaired relaxation is that it does not cause tachycardia.

Pericardial Tamponade

Pericardial tamponade is a common cause of hemodynamic instability after cardiac surgery.29 The clinical and echocardiographic findings of tamponade in cardiac surgery patients commonly differ from tamponade associated with medical conditions. This is because tamponade after cardiac surgery has usually developed rapidly, without time for hemodynamic compensation to develop, and even small fluid collections can cause marked hemodynamic compromise. Additionally, clotted blood may cause a localized compressive effect (regional tamponade).

Hemodynamically significant tamponade is uncommon if there has not been an initial period of high chest tube drainage. Occasionally, tamponade develops following correction of coagulopathy in a patient who is bleeding. Tamponade may also occur as a result of severe edema of the thoracic structures after prolonged, complicated cardiac surgery (see Gross Thoracic Edema in earlier material).

Diagnosis

Tamponade classically presents with hypotension, pulsus paradoxus, narrow arterial pulse pressure, and equally increased left and right atrial pressures. This constellation of clinical signs may develop in a patient who has a circumferential collection of unclotted blood. With echocardiography, unclotted blood appears as an echo-free (black) space around the heart (Fig. 20-1). The ventricular cavity typically appears small and underfilled—an echocardiographic sign termed “pseudohypertrophy”30—and the venae cavae appear distended.

When pericardial pressure exceeds the pressure in a cardiac chamber, collapse of that chamber occurs. This is manifested as atrial collapse during (ventricular) systole or ventricular collapse during diastole (the pressure in the ventricles is lowest in diastole and the pressure in the atria is lowest in ventricular systole).

In contrast to circumferential tamponade, regional tamponade is easily misdiagnosed. When clot overlies the right atrium or ventricle, CVP is usually high and PAWP usually low, mimicking right ventricular dysfunction; when clot lies behind the left atrium, PAWP is usually high and CVP is usually low, mimicking left ventricular dysfunction. Typical echocardiographic appearances of regional tamponade are shown in Figure 20-2. As clotted blood is echogenic, appearing gray or white, it may be difficult to delineate clot from myocardium, particularly in anterior collections. TEE usually provides far superior imaging than TTE.

image

Figure 20.2 Regional tamponade. Three common sites for localized pericardial clot formation are shown: (1) overlying the right atrial free wall; (2) behind the left atrium; (3) anterolateral to the right ventricle.

(Modified, with permission, from: Sidebotham D, Merry A, Legget M: In, eds. Practical Perioperative Transoesophageal Echocardiography. Fig. 6.2, p. 94. Philadelphia, Butterworth Heinemann, 2003.) LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle.

Usually tamponade presents acutely within the first 24 hours after surgery. However, it can also present several days after surgery as a subtle deterioration in cardiorespiratory function (see subsequent material).

Treatment

The decision to reoperate for tamponade can be difficult to make. The degree to which a pericardial collection is responsible for hemodynamic instability depends not only on the size of the collection but also on the speed with which it has developed, the underlying ventricular function, the vascular tone, and the volume status. In patients with severely impaired ventricular function, even small collections can cause profound hemodynamic compromise. The decision to surgically drain a pericardial collection must be balanced against the increased risk for mediastinitis associated with reopening sternal wounds.31

The definitive treatment for tamponade is chest reopening. Less invasive procedures such as opening the lower end of the sternal wound or percutaneous placement of a pigtail catheter are not recommended for tamponade that develops within the first few hours after surgery. There are two reasons for this. First, an active source of bleeding must be sought and controlled. Second, regional tamponade may not be treated reliably unless the pericardial space is fully explored.

Medical treatment of tamponade is supportive. Fluid and inotropes should be given to optimize cardiac function and maintain blood pressure. CVP and PAWP may need to be high. PEEP should be kept to a minimum to avoid further obstruction of systemic venous return.32 Patients should be sedated and paralyzed. A common practice is “stripping” the drain tubing, either with a roller or manually, to remove clot from within the drains and to augment the negative intrapericardial pressure. Although there are few data supporting this practice,33 it is occasionally dramatically effective in relieving pericardial tamponade.

Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction

Dynamic LVOT obstruction is a process whereby the anterior mitral leaflet is displaced into the LVOT (systolic anterior motion of the anterior mitral leaflet; SAM), leading to obstruction of left ventricular ejection and creating a mitral coaptation defect causing mitral regurgitation (see Fig. 7-12). It most commonly occurs in three situations: (1) following mitral valve repair; (2) in association with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy; (3) following aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. However, it can occur in any patient with left ventricular (particularly septal) hypertrophy who becomes hypovolemic, in whom vasodilation occurs, or who receives excessive β-adrenoreceptor agonist therapy. LVOT obstruction is made worse by interventions that reduce left ventricular systolic dimensions (hypovolemia, inotropic drugs) and afterload (vasodilators, IABPs) because they increase LVOT velocity, causing further entrainment of the anterior mitral leaflet.

Although the condition is uncommon, it must be considered in any patient who deteriorates despite escalating inotropic therapy, particularly if the patient has a history of hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, and normal systolic function. If the condition is suspected, an echocardiogram is mandatory to confirm the diagnosis.

Arrhythmia

Hemodynamically significant arrhythmias are usually obvious on the ECG. However, some are easily missed:

Careful inspection of 12-lead and atrial ECGs (without pacing) usually allows the arrhythmia to be detected and diagnosed. Occasionally, an arrhythmia is identified by the presence of cannon A waves on the CVP trace (see Chapter 8) or is based on abnormalities of the pulsed-wave Doppler transmitral E and A waves during an echocardiogram (see Chapter 7).

Loss of effective atrial systole (e.g., due to atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, ventricular pacing, atrioventricular dissociation) can cause marked hypotension, particularly with tachycardia and diastolic dysfunction. CVP and PAWP need to be higher than usual to optimize preload. Despite this, with echocardiography, the left ventricle may appear to be underfilled and vigorous.

Obstructed Venous Return

Obstructed venous return can arise from: (1) patient-ventilator dysynchrony; (2) dynamic lung hyperinflation; (3) tension pneumothorax. The cardinal features are hypotension, high CVP, and high ventilatory pressures.

Miscellaneous

Difficult Diagnosis

Sometimes the cause of hemodynamic instability is not readily apparent. There are several reasons for this. Often, the cause is multifactorial. In particular, when assessing intravascular volume status, the clinician must consider systolic and diastolic function, the presence of any pericardial collections, right ventricular function, rhythm disturbance, and mitral regurgitation. Subclinical problems that on their own do not cause hemodynamic instability can, in the presence of another problem, become significant. Thus, a small pericardial collection can cause profound hemodynamic compromise in the presence of severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Atrial fibrillation can cause important hemodynamic instability in the context of diastolic dysfunction. Low systemic vascular resistance can cause a major fall in blood pressure in the presence of aortic stenosis. Even if a specific diagnosis is made, it is still important to look for other, contributory problems.

Hemodynamic Instability in the Presence of Vigorous Systolic Function

A patient may be hypotensive or have a low cardiac output and yet have vigorous left ventricular function on echocardiography: “The heart looks fine but the patient looks terrible.” It should be clear from the foregoing discussion that normal or supranormal left ventricular systolic function is seen in several causes of hemodynamic instability. They are listed in Table 20-8.

Table 20-8 Causes of Hemodynamic Instability in Which Left Ventricular Function May Appear Vigorous on Echocardiography

Hypovolemia
Low systemic vascular resistance
Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction
Right ventricular dysfunction
Dynamic LVOT obstruction
Pericardial tamponade
Obstructed venous return
Mitral regurgitation
Rhythm disturbance

LVOT, left ventricular outflow tract.

Assessment of ventricular function must take into account loading conditions, the use of vasoactive drugs, and the patient’s metabolic rate as well as treatments such as an IABP and mechanical ventilation. Low preload (hypovolemia) and afterload (e.g., mitral regurgitation, low systemic vascular resistance) flatter ventricular function. Similarly, inotropic drugs, IABPs, and mechanical ventilation augment ventricular function. With normal ventricular function, inotropic drugs result in hyperdynamic wall motion, increased ejection fraction, and reduced ventricular volumes, particularly endsystolic volume. Even in patients with severely impaired systolic function, high-dose inotropic support imparts vigorous systolic wall motion, albeit with a characteristic “jerky” quality. Also, end-systolic volume remains elevated. Wall motion is hard to grade objectively in patients who are tachycardic.

With dynamic LVOT obstruction, stopping inotropic drugs and starting an infusion of phenylephrine is likely to improve the hemodynamic state. However, on echocardiography, systolic function will appear less vigorous and ejection fraction will appear reduced. (The increase in end-diastolic volume and the reduction in mitral regurgitation cause an increase in cardiac output despite a reduction in ejection fraction.) A similar phenomenon is seen with severe diastolic dysfunction.

Late Hemodynamic Instability

Much of the preceding discussion relates to the hypotension or low cardiac output that develops early in the postoperative period. Hemodynamic instability that occurs beyond 48 hours after surgery has a different presentation and differential diagnosis. After 48 hours, symptoms and signs are often subtle and of gradual onset. The clinical markers of low cardiac output listed in Table 20-3 are more reliable at this time than in the immediate postoperative period. The following features should also raise the possibility of low cardiac output:

If the suspicion of low cardiac output exists, an echocardiogram should be performed.

The causes of hemodynamic instability that should be considered are:

Postpericardectomy Syndrome

Postpericardectomy syndrome is characterized by malaise, fever, leukocytosis, myalgia, atrial arrhythmias, pleuritic chest pain, dyspnea and, occasionally, pericardial tamponade. The syndrome has been reported to occur in up to 17% of patients after cardiac surgery and is thought to have an autoimmune basis.34 Symptoms typically develop several weeks after surgery and have a variable course. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein are elevated. The ECG may demonstrate nonspecific ST-segment changes. Exudative (see Table 35-3) pleural and pericardial effusions are common; pulmonary infiltrates occur in a minority of patients.35 Postpericardectomy syndrome is a diagnosis of exclusion, and it is essential to rule out conditions such as infective endocarditis, pneumonia, and pulmonary embolism.

The treatment is nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and, if required, corticosteroids. Percutaneous drainage of pleural and pericardial effusions may be required, depending on the degree of hemodynamic compromise.

CARDIAC ARREST AND NEAR CARDIAC ARREST

The incidence of cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery is about 1% and, of the arrests that occur in the ICU, 33% to 79% of patients survive.3739 The two most common causes of cardiac arrest are ventricular fibrillation and pericardial tamponade.38,39 Early chest reopening, within 10 minutes of the arrest, is associated with improved survival.37

Specific Considerations for Cardiac Surgery Patients

The approach to resuscitation outlined later follows the recommendations of the American Heart Association40 but includes some important caveats, taking into account the specific needs of cardiac surgery patients. As stated before, early chest reopening should be considered in all patients who have not been effectively resuscitated within a few minutes of an arrest call. Most cardiac surgery patients are intubated and ventilated and have invasive monitoring in situ. This offers many advantages but can also complicate matters because patients may suffer a cardiac arrest as a direct consequence of a problem with the ventilator or the artificial airway. Furthermore, a monitoring error may lead to false reassurance or may precipitate inappropriate intervention. Sedation and paralysis render patients neurologically inaccessible. Thus, loss of consciousness—an important trigger to commence external chest compressions—is not available. Finally, bolus doses of epinephrine can cause marked hypertension, with potentially catastrophic results, in patients with near cardiac arrest or patients in true cardiac arrest who are rapidly defibrillated.

Definitions and Causes

Cardiac arrest is widely identified by the absence of a palpable carotid or femoral pulse. However, if systolic blood pressure falls below 50 to 60 mmHg, carotid pulsations may be absent41 despite the presence of useful cardiac function. Thus, in patients with invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring, cardiac arrest is more usefully defined as the absence of any spontaneous circulation. In practice, this equates with a nonpulsatile waveform and a MAP below about 25 mmHg. Near cardiac arrest may be defined as marked hypotension, that is, a MAP between 30 and 50 mmHg with a pulsatile waveform.

Cardiac arrest may be categorized as: (1) ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (P-VT); (2) asystole or profound bradycardia; or (3) pulseless electrical activity (PEA). PEA is a state in which there is an electrical rhythm that is not VF/VT or profound bradycardia but there is no palpable pulse. Severe hypotension in which there is electrical rhythm (not VT/VF or profound bradycardia) is sometimes called pseudo-PEA. The causes of cardiac arrest and near cardiac arrest in cardiac surgery patients, along with common exacerbating factors, are listed in Table 20-9.

Table 20-9 Causes of Cardiac Arrest and Near Cardiac Arrest Following Cardiac Surgery

Ventricular Fibrillation and Ventricular Tachycardia (see Chapter 21)
Myocardial infarction or ischemia (incomplete revascularization or graft occlusion)
Reperfusion injury (e.g., following coronary revascularization with preoperative severe ischemia)
R-on-T phenomenon with asynchronous pacing (see Chapter 21)
Acquired (usually secondary to hypokalemia or drug toxicity) or congenital long QT syndrome
Cardioversion with low energy or unsynchronized shocks
Drug toxicity (e.g., digoxin)
Asystole, Heart Block, and Profound Bradycardia (see Chapter 21)
Pacing problem (wires, connections, pacing box)
Injury to the cardiac conducting system due to the effects of cardioplegia, cardiac surgery, or cardiac pathology (e.g., aortic root abscess)
Sudden discontinuation of pacing (overdrive suppression; a temporary effect)
Massive hyperkalemia
Drug toxicity (e.g., β blockers, diltiazem)
Following prolonged ventricular fibrillation
Pulseless Electrical Activity and Pseudo-pulseless Electrical Activity
Narrow complex tachycardia with rapid ventricular response (see Chapter 21)
Hypovolemia
Tamponade
Massive myocardial infarction
Tension pneumothorax
Dynamic lung hyperinflation
Drug toxicity (vasodilators, myocardial depressants)
Anaphylaxis
Common Exacerbating Factors
Hypoxemia
Hypercarbia
Acidemia
Hypo- and hyperkalemia
Hyper- and hypomagnesemia
Hypo- and hyperthermia

Management

Initial Resuscitation

When a cardiac arrest call is made, timely and appropriate intervention can be lifesaving. Assessment and treatment must occur simultaneously. The diagnosis is often made retrospectively after successful resuscitation.

An algorithm for the initial approach to a cardiac arrest call and the early treatment of near cardiac arrest is shown in Figure 20-3. Initial assessment and intervention center on confirming the presence of cardiac arrest and identifying and eliminating an airway, ventilation, monitoring, or drug-delivery problem. First, it should be established that the hypotension is real by palpating a central pulse. The arterial waveform, ECG, transducer, and infusion devices should be inspected. If necessary, transducers should be rapidly leveled, zeroed, and flushed. If a pulse can be palpated but the arterial waveform suggests cardiac arrest, blood pressure should be measured noninvasively. If the patient is being paced, it should be discontinued briefly to rule out underlying ventricular fibrillation. As soon as cardiac arrest or near cardiac arrest is confirmed, external chest compression should be commenced. An exception to this is in near cardiac arrest when the patient is still conscious and in cardiac arrest when the rhythm is VF/VT (see later discussion). Intubated patients should be disconnected from ventilators and ventilated with a manual resuscitator (see Fig. 28-1) using 100% oxygen. Extubated patients should receive mask-assisted ventilation, and intubation should be considered. Prolonged attempts at intubation must be avoided because they interfere with regular mask ventilation and can delay defibrillation. Chest movements should be inspected, the trachea palpated, and breath sounds auscultated. Infusions of hypotensive drugs should be discontinued. This initial period of diagnosis and treatment should be completed within 30 to 60 seconds.

Rhythm-Specific Management

A rhythm-specific algorithm for managing cardiac arrest is shown in Figure 20-4.

Ventricular Fibrillation and Tachycardia.

The primary goal in VF or pulseless VT (see Fig. 20-4) is rapid defibrillation which, in the ICU, should occur within 1 minute of the onset of the rhythm. The technique of defibrillation is described in Chapter 40. Administration of external chest compressions while preparing for defibrillation is controversial. Often, VF/VT responds to the first attempt at defibrillation. By avoiding external chest compressions until after the first shock, potential damage to the sternum and heart is avoided, and defibrillation is not delayed. However, cardiac compressions should not be withheld for longer than 1 to 2 minutes under any circumstances.

Current guidelines42 recommend a single initial biphasic shock of 150 to 200 joules. If this is unsuccessful, the following should occur: (1) commencement of external chest compressions and ventilation by a manual resuscitator; (2) placement of an emergency reopening call; (3) administration of epinephrine 1 mg; (4) a search for reversible contributing factors. A blood sample for arterial blood gas and electrolyte analysis should be obtained and the prearrest ECG inspected to rule out long QT syndrome and myocardial ischemia and infarction. Further doses of epinephrine should be administered every 3 to 5 minutes. Following the first dose of epinephrine, amiodarone 300 mg or, if torsades de pointes is suspected, magnesium sulfate 1 to 2 g (4 to 8 mmol) should be given. Further amiodarone may be administered. Although widely used, lidocaine has not been demonstrated to be effective.43 Once the chest is open, defibrillation should be attempted using internal paddles (10 to 50 joules). For patients with intractable VT/VF, a return to the operating room for institution of CPB should be considered.

Asystole and Severe Bradycardia.

In an unmonitored setting, patients found with asystole have virtually no chance of survival because the rhythm typically represents the end result of untreated VF. However, in the ICU asystole is typically a witnessed event and, depending on the cause, it may be eminently treatable (see Fig. 20-4). Severe bradycardia secondary to complete heart block and a slow ventricular escape is much more common than true asystole. If epicardial pacing wires are in situ, asynchronous ventricular pacing at maximum output should be commenced (see Chapter 21). If this is unsuccessful, alternating the lead polarity and exchanging the pacemaker and leads may be effective. If epicardial pacing is not effective, transcutaneous pacing should be commenced. As soon as asystole is diagnosed, external chest compressions and ventilation by a manual resuscitator should be commenced. If pacing is unsuccessful, epinephrine 1 mg every 3 to 5 minutes and atropine 1 to 3 mg should be administered and an emergency chest reopening call made. A blood sample for arterial blood gas and electrolyte analysis should be obtained. A return to the operating room for institution of CPB may be considered.

Specific Issues During Resuscitation

Chest Reopening.

Early chest reopening, ideally within 10 minutes of the arrest,37 enhances the survival rates of patients who suffer cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery. Chest reopening affords several benefits. Once the chest is open, cardiac compressions and defibrillation can be performed internally, which is more efficient. Tamponade (and tension pneumothorax) may be identified and relieved. A bleeding site may be recognized and controlled. Inspection of the heart may reveal dehiscence or occlusion of a coronary graft. Pacing wires may be reattached. An operating team is assembled because it may be required for subsequent surgery. If a decision is made to return to the operating room, internal cardiac compressions can continue while the patient is transferred from the ICU. As far as possible, a sterile technique should be maintained during chest reopening in the ICU. Prophylactic antibiotics should be administered.

Role of Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Extracorporeal Support.

When patients suffer cardiac arrest in the early period after cardiac surgery, and they do not respond to conventional resuscitative measures, including chest reopening, emergency CPB should be considered. In two series, survival rates through the use of this approach were 42% and 56%.47,48 Institution of CPB may be used to rest and reperfuse the heart, control malignant arrhythmias, and correct metabolic derangements. Further surgery, most commonly revision of a coronary graft, may be performed. Following CPB it may be appropriate—in selected patients—to provide a further period of mechanical support (see Chapter 22). In one small study of prolonged cardiac arrest in various patient groups, the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a rescue therapy resulted in a 30% rate of survival, and arrest after cardiac surgery was associated with improved outcome.49

REFERENCES

1 Bourgoin A, Leone M, Delmas A, et al. Increasing mean arterial pressure in patients with septic shock: effects on oxygen variables and renal function. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:780-786.

2 Linton RA, Linton NW, Kelly F. Is clinical assessment of the circulation reliable in postoperative cardiac surgical patients ? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2002;16:4-7.

3 Reinhart K, Kuhn HJ, Hartog C, et al. Continuous central venous and pulmonary artery oxygen saturation monitoring in the critically ill. Intens Care Med. 2004;30:1572-1578.

4 Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002;121:2000-2008.

5 Larson SL, Schimmel CH, Shott S, et al. Influence of fast-track anesthetic technique on cardiovascular infusions and weight gain. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1999;13:424-430.

6 Bendjelid K, Romand JA. Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a review of indices used in intensive care. Intens Care Med. 2003;29:352-360.

7 Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:691-699.

8 Tousignant CP, Walsh F, Mazer CD. The use of transesophageal echocardiography for preload assessment in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:351-355.

9 Finfer S, Bellomo R, Boyce N, et al. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2247-2256.

10 Kristof AS, Magder S. Low systemic vascular resistance state in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:1121-1127.

11 Carrel T, Englberger L, Mohacsi P, et al. Low systemic vascular resistance after cardiopulmonary bypass: incidence, etiology, and clinical importance. J Card Surg. 2000;15:347-353.

12 Levin RL, Degrange MA, Bruno GF, et al. Methylene blue reduces mortality and morbidity in vasoplegic patients after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:496-499.

13 Kilger E, Weis F, Briegel J, et al. Stress doses of hydrocortisone reduce severe systemic inflammatory response syndrome and improve early outcome in a risk group of patients after cardiac surgery. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:1068-1074.

14 Kloner RA, Przyklenk K, Kay GL. Clinical evidence for stunned myocardium after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Card Surg. 1994;9:397-402.

15 Huang YG, Wong KC, Yip WH, et al. Cardiovascular responses to graded doses of three catecholamines during lactic and hydrochloric acidosis in dogs. Br J Anaesth. 1995;74:583-590.

16 Toller W, Wolkart G, Stranz C, et al. Contractile action of levosimendan and epinephrine during acidosis. Eur J Pharmacol. 2005;507:199-209.

17 Mathieu D, Neviere R, Billard V, et al. Effects of bicarbonate therapy on hemodynamics and tissue oxygenation in patients with lactic acidosis: a prospective, controlled clinical study. Crit Care Med. 1991;19:1352-1356.

18 Cooper DJ, Walley KR, Wiggs BR, et al. Bicarbonate does not improve hemodynamics in critically ill patients who have lactic acidosis: a prospective, controlled clinical study. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:492-498.

19 Reichert CL, Visser CA, Koolen JJ, et al. Transesophageal echocardiography in hypotensive patients after cardiac operations: comparison with hemodynamic parameters. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;104:321-326.

20 Goldstein JA, Vlahakes GJ, Verrier ED, et al. Volume loading improves low cardiac output in experimental right ventricular infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983;2:270-278.

21 Gewirtz H, Gold HK, Fallon JT, et al. Role of right ventricular infarction in cardiogenic shock associated with inferior myocardial infarction. Br Heart J. 1979;42:719-725.

22 Ferrario M, Poli A, Previtali M, et al. Hemodynamics of volume loading compared with dobutamine in severe right ventricular infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:329-333.

23 Dell’Italia LJ, Starling MR, Blumhardt R, et al. Comparative effects of volume loading, dobutamine, and nitroprusside in patients with predominant right ventricular infarction. Circulation. 1985;72:1327-1335.

24 Christenson JT, Maurice J, Simonet F, et al. Open chest and delayed sternal closure after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1996;10:305-311.

25 Masoudi FA, Havranek EP, Smith G, et al. Gender, age, and heart failure with preserved left ventricular systolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:217-223.

26 Hogg K, Swedberg K, McMurray J. Heart failure with preserved left ventricular systolic function; epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:317-327.

27 Breisblatt WM, Stein KL, Wolfe CJ, et al. Acute myocardial dysfunction and recovery: a common occurrence after coronary bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:1261-1269.

28 Krams R, McFalls E, van der Giessen WJ, et al. Does intravenous milrinone have a direct effect on diastolic function ? Am Heart J. 1991;121:1951-1955.

29 Ball JB, Morrison WL. Experience with cardiac tamponade following open heart surgery. Heart Vessels. 1996;11:39-43.

30 Bommer WJ, Follette D, Pollock M, et al. Tamponade in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a clinical-echocardiographic diagnosis. Am Heart J. 1995;130:1216-1223.

31 El Oakley R, Paul E, Wong PS, et al. Mediastinitis in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: risk analysis and midterm results. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;38:595-600.

32 Mattila I, Takkunen O, Mattila P, et al. Cardiac tamponade and different modes of artificial ventilation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1984;28:236-240.

33 Wallen M, Morrison A, Gillies D, et al. Mediastinal chest drain clearance for cardiac surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2004:CD 003042.

34 Engle MA, Gay WAJr, McCabe J, et al. Postpericardiotomy syndrome in adults: incidence, autoimmunity and virology. Circulation. 1981;64:II58-II60.

35 Kaminsky ME, Rodan BA, Osborne DR, et al. Postpericardiotomy syndrome. Am J Roentgenol. 1982;138:503-508.

36 Kollef MH, Wragge T, Pasque C. Determinants of mortality and multiorgan dysfunction in cardiac surgery patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1995;107:1395-1401.

37 Mackay JH, Powell SJ, Osgathorp J, et al. Six-year prospective audit of chest reopening after cardiac arrest. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;22:421-425.

38 Anthi A, Tzelepis GE, Alivizatos P, et al. Unexpected cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery: incidence, predisposing causes, and outcome of open chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Chest. 1998;113:15-19.

39 Wahba A, Gotz W, Birnbaum DE. Outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation following open heart surgery. Scand Cardiovasc J. 1997;31:147-149.

40 Resuscitation International Committee. 2005 International Consensus Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation (Si). 2005;III:1-163.

41 Deakin CD, Low JL. Accuracy of the advanced trauma life-support guidelines for predicting systolic blood pressure using carotid, femoral, and radial pulses: observational study. Br Med J. 2000;321:673-674.

42 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Part 3: Defibrillation. Circulation. 2005;112:III17-III24.

43 American Heart Association. Part 7.2: Management of cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2005;112:IV57-IV66.

44 Aufderheide TP, Lurie KG. Death by hyperventilation: a common and life-threatening problem during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:S345-S351.

45 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Part 4: Advanced life support. Circulation. 2005;112:III25-III54.

46 American Heart Association. Part 10.1: Life-threatening electrolyte abnormalities. Circulation. 2005;112:IV121-IV125.

47 Rousou JA, Engelman RM, Flack JE3rd, et al. Emergency cardiopulmonary bypass in the cardiac surgical unit can be a lifesaving measure in postoperative cardiac arrest. Circulation. 1994;90:II280-II284.

48 Birdi I, Chaudhuri N, Lenthall K, et al. Emergency reinstitution of cardiopulmonary bypass following cardiac surgery: outcome justifies the cost. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17:743-746.

49 Chen YS, Chao A, Yu HY, et al. Analysis and results of prolonged resuscitation in cardiac arrest patients rescued by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:197-203.