Heart

Published on 12/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Radiology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1717 times

8

Heart

Angiocardiography

Diagnostic catheterization has largely been replaced by echocardiography (including transoesophageal echocardiography), radionuclide ventriculography and MR imaging. Angiocardiography is usually used as part of an interventional therapeutic procedure and can be performed simultaneously with cardiac catheterization during which pressures and oximetry are measured in the cardiac chambers and vessels that are under investigation. The right heart, left heart and great vessels are examined together or alone, depending on the clinical problem.

Technique

1. Right-sided cardiac structures and pulmonary arteries are examined by introducing a catheter into a peripheral vein. In babies the femoral vein may be the only vein large enough to take the catheter. If an atrial septal defect is suspected, the femoral vein approach offers the best chance of passing the catheter into the left atrium across the defect. In adults the right antecubital or basilic vein may be used. The cephalic vein should be avoided as it can be difficult to pass the catheter past the site where the vein pierces the clavipectoral fascia to join the axillary vein. The catheter, or introducer, is introduced using the Seldinger technique. (The NIH catheter must be introduced via an introducer as there is no end hole for a guidewire.)

2. In children it is usually possible to examine the left heart and occasionally the aorta by manipulating a venous catheter through a patent foramen ovale. In adults the aorta and left ventricle are studied via a catheter passed retrogradely from the femoral artery.

3. The catheter is manipulated into the appropriate positions for recording pressures and sampling blood for oxygen saturation. Following this, angiography is performed.

Image acquisition

Using digital angiography at 7.5 frames s–1 with alignment to the anatomical axes of the heart, i.e. the X-ray beam is angulated relative to the axial planes of the heart rather the orthogonal planes of the body. The long axis of the heart is usually oblique to the long axis of the patient’s body and cardiac angiography suites have movable C-arms which allow correct positioning by movement of the equipment alone without disturbing the patient. Supplementary angulations of the X-ray beam from the cardiac axes are used to profile those areas of the heart under examination. Useful views are:

Coronary arteriography

Indications

Diagnostic arteriography can be supplemented by intravascular ultrasound (US) to determine the nature and extent of plaque within the vessel wall and, in some centres, with angioscopy. Pressure wire studies to determine fractional flow reduction (FFR) across stenoses prior to angioplasty/stenting can be performed; particularly useful in assessment of intermediate lesions.

Equipment

1. Digital angiography with C-arm

2. Pressure recording device and ECG monitor

3. Selective coronary artery catheters:

(a) Judkins (Fig. 8.4) or Amplatz (Fig. 8.5) catheters – the left and right coronary artery catheters are of different shape. These can be used for both femoral or radial approaches (usually utilizing smaller Judkins for the left coronary artery)

(b) Tiger II catheter (Fig. 8.6) – specifically designed for right radial approach. Single catheter used for both left and right coronary arteries (reduces procedure time, radiation exposure and less manipulation leading to less radial artery spasm)

(c) For assessment of grafts: Judkins, Simmons and others (for both femoral and radial approaches).

Cardiac CT

The rapid evolution of multi-detector CT scanner technology over the last 5 years has resulted in cardiac CT and coronary CT angiography becoming well-established techniques in the investigation and management of cardiovascular disease. Greater temporal resolution, sophisticated ECG-gating software and post processing algorithms and, very importantly, radiation dose-reducing strategies allow cardiac CT to be used widely. CT has a high accuracy in detecting coronary vessel stenoses and a very high negative predictive value in excluding significant disease.

Patient preparation

1. Avoid caffeine – this includes tea, coffee and caffeine-containing soft drinks (including ‘decaffeinated’ varieties), ‘energy’ pills and Viagra-type medication.

2. Drugs – patients should take all their normal cardiac medication as usual on the day of the test.

3. Thorough explanation of the procedure to the patient aids compliance, particularly with regard to breath-hold (suggest patient takes a ‘image breath’ when instructed – less likely to move during scan and avoids ‘Valsalva’ manoeuvre affecting contrast bolus entering chest).

4. 18G cannula in right antecubital fossa – siting cannula in right arm reduces artefact as contrast crosses the mediastinum. For graft studies this avoids streak artefact obscuring origin of LIMA grafts.

5. Assess suitability for administration of β-blockers and sublingual nitrates (see below).

Beta-blockers

Optimal imaging quality and radiation dose are significantly influenced by heart rate, which ideally should be between 55–65 bpm. With basic precautions and simple monitoring, safe and dose-titratable heart rate reduction can be achieved in the majority of patients using β-blocker administered within the radiology department. Metoprolol is commonly used and can be given orally or intravenously, or in combination.

(Contraindications to β-blockade include heart failure, significant aortic stenosis, heart block, asthma/COPD, use of other antiarrhythmic medication including calcium channel blockers and digoxin.)

Scan protocol

All scans are ECG-gated (a) to allow retrospective reconstruction of images timed to specific points in the cardiac cycle, (b) where possible, to allow prospective ECG triggering of the scan with X-ray exposure only during specific parts of the cardiac cycle (usually mid-late diastole to derive coronary artery images) or (c) if prospective triggering is not possible, to modulate the tube current – by decreasing X-ray exposure during parts of the cardiac cycle where image quality is not so critical (usually systole and early diastole) to reduce overall radiation dose.

Contrast-enhanced cardiac scan

Contrast administration

The rapidity of the scan acquisition necessitates very accurate timing of contrast bolus to ensure optimal vessel opacification (but also means that generally smaller volumes of contrast medium can be utilized). Biphasic injection of contrast followed by saline ‘chaser’ (or if desired, diluted contrast) improves geometry of delivery of contrast and ‘washes out’ the right side of the heart to reduce streak artefact. Typically 90–100 ml LOCM 350 mg I ml–1-given at 5–7 ml s–1 followed by 40–50 ml saline at 4–7 ml s–1. Graft studies need higher volume of contrast 100–120 ml LOCM 350 mg I ml–1 at 5–6 ml s–1.

Bolus timing can be achieved using:

1. Empirical delay of c. 25 s. Unreliable and not recommended

2. ‘Bolus-tracking’ – a selected region-of-interest (ROI) – usually ascending aorta – is scanned every second or so following contrast injection and the full acquisition scan is automatically triggered (after a short delay) once the ROI has enhanced to a preset level e.g. 120 HU

3. ‘Test bolus’ – a small initial injection of contrast (e.g. 20 ml contrast with 40 ml saline ‘chaser’ bolus) is given and the ROI (ascending aorta) is scanned and time-to-peak enhancement is derived. The full scan is then performed using this timing delay. (Usually add 3 s to allow for maximal coronary vessel enhancement). This method is probably the most reliable and accurate, confirms i.v. line patency and familiarizes the patient ready for the final crucial acquisition scan.

Further Reading

Bastarrika, G, Lee, YS, Huda, W, et al. CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology. 2009; 253(2):317–338.

Boxt, LM. Coronary computed tomography angiography: a practical guide to performance and interpretation. Semin Roentgenol. 2012; 47(3):204–219.

Mahesh, M, Cody, DD. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: physics of cardiac imaging with multiple-row detector CT. RadioGraphics. 2007; 27:1495–1509.

Pannu, HK, Alvarez, W, Fishman, EK. Review: β-blockers for cardiac CT: a primer for the radiologist. Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 186:S341–S345.

Schoepf, UJ, Zwerner, PL, Savino, G, et al. Coronary CT angiography: how I do it. Radiology. 2007; 244:48–63.

Sun, Z, Ng, KH. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated multislice CT coronary angiography: a systematic review of radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy. Euro J Radiol. 2012; 81(2):94–100.

Taylor, CM, Blum, A, Abbara, S. Cardiac CT: Patient preparation and scanning techniques. Radiol Clin North Am. 2010; 48(4):675–686.

Cardiac MR

Cardiac MR imaging has a major role in the assessment of cardiac disease. MR is well established in the evaluation of cardiac and major vessel anatomy, ventricular volumes and mass; functional imaging to assess ventricular and valve motion; and flow quantification allowing measurement of blood velocity and volume to assess intracardiac shunts and stenotic and regurgitant, valvular disease. More recently contrast-enhanced MR has evolved as a powerful tool in assessing myocardial viability and perfusion both in the evaluation of acute myocardial ischaemia and also in assessment of myocardial viability and potential reversibility prior to revascularization. Coronary artery MR imaging has yet to be developed to be of routine use and, for the present, has been comprehensively overtaken by recent advances in CT coronary imaging.

Technique

Technique will be varied depending on indication, but will consist of elements from the following.

Further Reading

Belloni, E, De Cobelli, F, Esposito, A, et al. MRI of cardiomyopathy. Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 191(6):1702–1710.

Ginat, DT, Fong, MW, Tuttle, DJ, et al. Review: cardiac imaging: Part 1, MR pulse sequences, imaging planes, and basic anatomy. Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 197(4):808–815.

Kramer, CM, Barkhausen, J, Flamm, SD, et al. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols, society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance: board of trustees task force on standardized protocols. J Cardiovasc Mag Res. 2008; 10:35.

O’Donnell, DH, Abbara, S, Chaithiraphan, V, et al. Cardiac tumours: optimal cardiac MR sequences and spectrum of imaging appearances. Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193(2):377–387.

Schwitter, J, Arai, AE. Assessment of cardiac ischaemia and viability: role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Euro Heart J. 2011; 32:799–809.

Radionuclide ventriculography

Indications

Gated blood-pool study1

(Previous indications of first pass radionuclide angiography – for evaluation of right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) and detection and quantification of intracardiac shunts are now superseded by echocardiography and MR unless for very specialist indications and will not be described here.)

Technique

List mode is best, where individual events are stored as their x,y coordinates along with timing and gating pulses. This allows maximum flexibility for later manipulation and framing of data. Around 5 million counts should be acquired. However, MUGA mode is adequate, and is still the most commonly used. In this, the start of an acquisition cycle is usually triggered by the R wave of the patient’s ECG. A series of 16–32 fast frames are recorded before the next R wave occurs. Each of these has very few counts in from a single cycle, so every time the R wave trigger arrives another set of frames is recorded and summed with the first. The sequence continues until 100–200 kilo-counts per frame have been acquired in about 10 min. Some degree of arrhythmia can be tolerated using the technique of ‘buffered bad beat rejection’, where cardiac cycles of irregular length are rejected and the data not included in the images. The length of time to acquire an image set increases as the proportion of rejected beats rises.

Additional techniques

1. Gated blood-pool imaging can be carried out during controlled exercise with appropriate precautions to assess ventricular functional reserve. Leg exercise using a bed-mounted bicycle ergometer is the method of choice. Shoulder restraints and hand grips help to reduce upper body movement during imaging. For patients unable to exercise effectively, stress with dobutamine infusion is used.2 Under continuous monitoring, the dose is incrementally increased from 5 to 20 µg kg–1 min–1, infusing each dose for 3 min. The infusion is stopped when S-T segment depression of >3 mm, any ventricular arrhythmia, systolic blood pressure >220 mmHg, attainment of maximum heart rate, or any side effects occur.

2. Gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) blood pool acquisition can be used for measurement of left as well as the right ventricular function using special software (Autoquant+) which calculates the left and right ventricular volumes.

3. With gated SPECT using the myocardial perfusion imaging agents 99mTc-MIBI and 99mTc-tetrofosmin (see ‘Radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging’), it is possible to combine ventriculography and perfusion scans in a single study.3,4

When acquiring gated SPECT studies ventricular parameters are usually measured during rest study only because of the length of the examination (20 min).

Radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging

Radiopharmaceuticals1,2

1. 99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI or sestamibi), up to 800 MBq (8 mSv ED) for planar imaging, 800 MBq (8 mSv ED) for SPECT (or 1600 MBq max. for the total of two injections in single day rest/exercise protocols). Cationic complex with myocardial uptake in near proportion to coronary blood flow but minimal redistribution. There is also, normally, liver uptake and biliary excretion, which can cause inferior wall artifacts on SPECT if care is not taken. Separate injections are required for stress/rest studies, but image timing is flexible due to minimal redistribution.

2. 99mTc-tetrofosmin (Myoview) (activity and radiation dose as for MIBI). Similar uptake characteristics and diagnostic efficacy to MIBI, but with easier preparation.

3. 201Tl-thallous chloride, 80 MBq max. (18 mSv ED). Thallium is a potassium analogue with initial rapid myocardial uptake in near proportion to coronary blood flow, and subsequent washout and redistribution. Hence, unlike the 99mTc agents, same-day stress/rest redistribution studies can be performed with a single injection. With principal photon energies of 68–72 and 167 keV and T1/2 of 73 h, it is not ideal for imaging and gives a higher radiation dose than the newer 99mTc alternatives. It is increasingly being replaced by 99mTc agents. However, many still consider 201Tl for assessment of myocardial viability and hibernation, with either re-injection at rest or a separate day rest-redistribution study giving the greatest sensitivity.

4. 18FDG + blood flow PET. The radio-isotope gold standard for viability assessment, but not widely available.3

5. Rubidium-82 PET. This study can be used to assess myocardial perfusion. Not widely available.

Technique

The principle of the technique is to compare myocardial perfusion under conditions of pharmacological stress or physical exercise, with perfusion at rest. Diseased but patent arterial territories will show lower perfusion under stress conditions than healthy arteries, but will show relatively improved perfusion at rest. Infarcted tissue will show no improvement at rest. Hence, prognostic information on the likelihood of adverse cardiac events and the benefits of revascularization can be gained.4

Stress regimen

Pharmacological stress has become increasingly widely used instead of physical exercise.5 The optimal stress technique aims to maximize coronary arterial flow. The preferred pharmacological stressing agent is adenosine infusion (0.14 mg kg–1 min–1 for 6 min).6 Adenosine is a potent coronary vasodilator. It reproducibly increases coronary artery flow by more than maximal physical exercise (which often cannot be achieved in this group of patients). It has a short biological half-life of 8–10 s, so most side effects are reversed simply by discontinuing infusion. Stressing with adenosine has now almost completely replaced dipyridamole and will not be discussed here.

There are circumstances where adenosine is contraindicated, e.g. asthma, second-degree heart block or systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg. Dobutamine stress may be employed in these circumstances.7 Dobutamine acts as a ß1 receptor agonist, increasing contractility and heart rate. Under continuous monitoring, the dose is incrementally increased from 5 to 20 µg kg–1 min–1, infusing each dose for 3 min. The infusion is terminated when S-T segment depression of >3 mm, any ventricular arrhythmia, systolic blood pressure >220 mmHg, attainment of maximum heart rate, or any side effects occur. Dobutamine is contraindicated in patients with aortic aneurysm. New, more specific targeted agents such as regadenoson (A2A adenosine receptor agonist) are being developed which could be used in asthmatic patients rather than dobutamine.8

2-Day protocol (stress/rest)

1. Initiate pharmacological stress or exercise

2. Up to 800 MBq MIBI or tetrofosmin is administered i.v. at maximal stress, continuing the stress protocol for 2 min post injection to allow uptake in the myocardium

3. 10–30 min post injection, a milky drink or similar is given to promote biliary clearance; high fluid intake will dilute bowel contents

4. Images are acquired 15–30 min after tetrofosmin or 60–120 min after sestamibi injection. If there is excessive liver uptake or activity in small bowel close to the heart, imaging should be delayed by a further 60 min

5. Depending on the clinical situation, if the stress scan is completely normal the patient may not need to return for the rest scan10

6. Preferably 2–7 days later, the patient returns for a resting scan

7. Glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) (two 0.3 mg tablets) or equivalent sublingual spray may be given to improve blood flow to ischaemic, but viable segments11

8. Immediately, up to 800 MBq MIBI or tetrofosmin i.v., is administered and proceed as for stress imaging.

201Tl stress/rest test

Since 201Tl redistributes after injection, stress/rest studies can be performed with a single injection. However, stress image timing is more critical:

Images

SPECT

1. Position patient as comfortably as possible with their arms above their head (or at least the left arm) if possible. SPECT images may be severely degraded by patient movement, so attention should be paid to keeping the patient very still.

2. For the 99mTc agents, check for activity in bowel loops close to the inferior wall of the heart. This can cause artifacts in the reconstructed images, so if significant activity is seen, delay the imaging to give greater time for clearance.

3. 180° orbit from RAO 45° to LPO 45°, elliptical if possible. With modern dual-headed systems, this can be achieved with the heads at 90° to each other to minimize the amount of camera rotation required.

4. Matrix size and zoom to give a pixel size of 6 mm.

5. 60 projections, with a total imaging time of about 30–40 min for single and 15–25 min for dual-head systems.

6. View the projections as a cine before the patient leaves the department. If available, perform software motion correction. If there is significant movement that cannot be corrected, repeat imaging. Beware ‘diaphragmatic creep’, particularly on 201Tl patients breathless after exercise, where the average position of the diaphragm changes as they recover.

Additional techniques

1. Gated SPECT is now recommended,12 and with special software (e.g. Cedars Sinai QGS package, Emory cardiac tool box) can provide additional information on ventricular wall motion, ejection fraction and chamber volume. It can also improve specificity by reducing artifactual defects caused by regional myocardial motion and wall thickening.

2. Bull’s-eye maps can be compared to normal databases and displayed quantitatively in terms of severity and extent of relative underperfusion.13

3. Attenuation and scatter correction using scanning transmission line sources or CT are now available on most modern dual-headed systems. This technique can improve diagnostic specificity by correcting attenuation artifacts and thereby increasing the normalcy rate. However, algorithms are still being improved, so at present it is wise to view the attenuation-corrected and uncorrected images together to identify possible introduced artifacts.14

4. The combination of rest 201Tl and exercise 99mTc MIBI or tetrofosmin can be used to assess both ischaemia and viability.15

References

1. Reyes, E, Loong, CY, Harbinson, M, et al. A comparison of Tl-201, Tc-99m sestamibi, and Tc-99m tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion scinitgraphy in patients with mild to moderate coronary stenosis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006; 13(4):488–494.

2. Kapur, A, Latus, KA, Davies, G, et al. A comparison of three radionuclide myocardial perfusion tracers in clinical practice: the ROBUST study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002; 29(12):1608–1616.

3. Nandalur, KR, Dwamena, BA, Choudhri, AF, et al. Diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Acad Radiol. 2008; 15(4):444–451.

4. Travin, MI, Bergmann, SR. Assessment of myocardial viability. Semin Nucl Med. 2005; 35(1):2–16.

5. Travain, MI, Wexler, JP. Pharmacological stress testing. Semin Nucl Med. 1999; 29:298–318.

6. Takeishi, Y, Takahashi, N, Fujiwara, S, et al. Myocardial tomography with technetium-99m-tetrofosmin during intravenous infusion of adenosine triphosphate. J Nucl Med. 1998; 39:582–586.

7. Verani, MS. Dobutamine myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 1994; 35:737–739.

8. Iskandrian, AE, Bateman, TM, Belardinelli, L, et al. Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging: results of the ADVANCE phase 3 multicenter international trial. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007; 14(5):645–658.

9. Tadehara, F, Yamamoto, H, Tsujiyama, S, et al. Feasibility of a rapid protocol of 1-day single-isotope rest/adenosine stress Tc-99m sestamibi ECG-gated myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008; 15(1):35–41.

10. Lavalaye, JM, Shroeder-Tanka, JM, Tiel-van Buul, MM, et al. Implementation of technetium-99m MIBI SPECT imaging guidelines: optimizing the two-day stress-rest protocol. Int J Card Imaging. 1997; 13:331–335.

11. Thorley, PJ, Sheard, KL, Wright, DJ, et al. The routine use of sublingual GTN with resting 99mTc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion imaging. Nucl Med Commun. 1998; 19:937–942.

12. Travin, MI, Heller, GV, Johnson, LL, et al. The prognostic value of ECG-gated SPECT imaging in patients undergoing stress Tc-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004; 11(3):253–262.

13. Schwaiger, M, Melin, J. Cardiological applications of nuclear medicine. Lancet. 1999; 354:661–666.

14. Banzo, I, Pena, FJ, Allende, RH, et al. Prospective clinical comparison of non-corrected and attenuation- and scatter-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with suspicion of coronary artery disease. Nucl Med Commun. 2003; 24(9):995–1002.

15. Kim, Y, Goto, H, Kobayshi, K, et al. A new method to evaluate ischemic heart disease: combined use of rest thallium-201 myocardial SPECT and Tc-99m exercise tetrofosmin first pass and myocardial SPECT. Ann Nucl Med. 1999; 13:147–153.