Heart

Published on 01/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Radiology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1726 times

Chapter 8 Heart

Methods of imaging the heart

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY

Diagnostic catheterization has predominantly been replaced by echocardiography (including transoesophageal echocardiography), radionuclide ventriculography and MRI. Angiocardiography is usually used as part of an interventional therapeutic procedure and can be performed simultaneously with cardiac catheterization during which pressures and oximetry are measured in the cardiac chambers and vessels that are under investigations. The right heart, left heart and great vessels are examined together or alone, depending on the clinical problem.

CORONARY ARTERIOGRAPHY

CARDIAC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (INCLUDING CORONARY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY)

As a result of advances in CT technology, non-invasive cardiac imaging is becoming central to the diagnosis and management of patients with cardiac disease. This is the result of fast scan times and cardiac gating facilities available with multidetector CT scanners. Whilst the examination is tailored to assessment of the cardiac structures, CT imaging gives the benefit over conventional cardiac and coronary angiography of demonstrating clinically significant non-cardiac findings within the adjacent mediastinum, lungs or upper abdomen,1 and can give additional information regarding plaque characterization.

Cardiac CT may be performed as:

The coronary artery calcium (CAC) score is calculated from the volume of calcium present in the coronary arteries. A high score indicates an increased risk of adverse coronary events and CAC scoring has been used as a screening tool for subclinical cardiac disease. Absence of coronary artery calcification does not exclude atheroma but is associated with a low risk of adverse coronary event. Evidence shows that scores will probably need to be matched to age, sex and ethnic background.2

Coronary computed tomographic angiography

Documented mean effective radiation dose for coronary CTA ranges from 6 to 25 mSv3 and reported mean effective dose for conventional catheter angiography is 5.6 mSv.4 Further improvements in CT technology continue to reduce effective dose but there must be constant awareness with attempt to minimize dose wherever possible. Tailored coronary CTA is well-documented to have a high negative predictive value for coronary artery stenosis.5,6

Technique

The exact technique will depend on individual CT scanner technology and requires a multidetector CT which is 16 slice or above. Each CT manufacturer will advise scan protocols tailored to their specific scanners; however, general parameters useful for coronary artery assessment cardiac CT are as follows:7

References

1 Weinreb J.C., Larson P.A., Woodard P.K., et al. American College of Radiology clinical statement on noninvasive cardiac imaging. Radiology. 2005;235:723-727.

2 Preis S.R., O’Donnell C.J. Coronary heart disease risk assessment by traditional risk factors and newer subclinical disease imaging: is a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach the best option? Editorial. Arch. Intern. Med.. 2007;167(22):2399-2401.

3 Mahesh M., Cody D.D. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: physics of cardiac imaging with multiple-row detector CT. RadioGraphics. 2007;27:1495-1509.

.

4 Coles D.R., Smail M.A., Negus I.S., et al. Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.. 2006;47:1840-1845.

5 Abdulla J., Abildstrom S.Z., Gotzsche O., et al. 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Heart J.. 2007;28(24):3042-3050.

6 Nieman K., Cademartiri F., Lemos P.A., et al. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation. 2002;106:2051-2054.

7 Schoepf U.J., Zwerner P.L., Savino G., et al. Coronary CT angiography: how I do it. Radiology. 2007;244:48-63.

8 Earls J.P., Berman E.L., Urban B.A., et al. Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology. 2008;246:742-753.

9 Pugliese F., Mollet N.R., Hunink M.G., et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography by using different generations of multisection scanners: single center experience. Radiology. 2008;246:384-393.

Radionuclide Ventriculography

Technique

First-pass radionuclide angiography

This provides information on right ventricular function and intra-cardiac shunts, although only from one view unless a multi-headed camera or bi-planar collimator is available:

Radionuclide Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Radiopharmaceuticals1,2

Technique

The principal of the technique is to compare myocardial perfusion under conditions of pharmacological stress or physical exercise, with perfusion at rest. Diseased but patent arterial territories will show lower perfusion under stress conditions than healthy arteries, but will show relatively improved perfusion at rest. Infarcted tissue will show no improvement at rest. Hence, prognostic information on the likelihood of adverse cardiac events and the benefits of revascularization can be gained.4

Stress regime

Pharmacological stress has become increasingly widely used instead of physical exercise.5 The optimal stress technique aims to maximize coronary arterial flow. The preferred pharmacological stressing agent is adenosine infusion (0.14 mg kg−1 min−1 for 6 min).6 Adenosine is a potent coronary vasodilator. It reproducibly increases coronary artery flow by more than maximal physical exercise (which often cannot be achieved in this group of patients). It has a short biological half-life of 8–10 s, so most side-effects are reversed simply by discontinuing infusion. Stressing with adenosine has now largely replaced dipyridamole, which will not be discussed here.

There are circumstances where adenosine is contraindicated, e.g. asthma, second-degree heart block or systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg. Dobutamine stress may be employed in these circumstances.7 Dobutamine acts as a ß1 receptor agonist, increasing contractility and heart rate. Under continuous monitoring, the dose is incrementally increased from 5 to 20 μg kg−1 min−1, infusing each dose for 3 min. The infusion is terminated when S-T segment depression of >3 mm, any ventricular arrhythmia, systolic blood pressure >220 mmHg, attainment of maximum heart rate, or any side-effects occur. Dobutamine is contraindicated in patients with aortic aneurysm. New, more specific targeted agents such as regadenoson (A2A adenosine receptor agonist) are being developed which could be used in asthmatic patients rather than dobutamine.8

References

1 Reyes E., Loong C.Y., Harbinson M., et al. A comparison of Tl-201, Tc-99m sestamibi, and Tc-99m tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion scinitgraphy in patients with mild to moderate coronary stenosis. J. Nucl. Cardiol.. 2006;13(4):488-494.

2 Kapur A., Latus K.A., Davies G., et al. A comparison of three radionuclide myocardial perfusion tracers in clinical practice: the ROBUST study. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2002;29(12):1608-1616.

3 Nandalur K.R., Dwamena B.A., Choudhri A.F., et al. Diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Acad. Radiol.. 2008;15(4):444-451.

4 Travin M.I., Bergmann S.R. Assessment of myocardial viability. Semin. Nucl. Med.. 2005;35(1):2-16.

5 Travain M.I., Wexler J.P. Pharmacological stress testing. Semin. Nucl. Med.. 1999;29:298-318.

6 Takeishi Y., Takahashi N., Fujiwara S., et al. Myocardial tomography with technetium-99m-tetrofosmin during intravenous infusion of adenosine triphosphate. J. Nucl. Med.. 1998;39:582-586.

7 Verani M.S. Dobutamine myocardial perfusion imaging. J. Nucl. Med.. 1994;35:737-739.

8 Iskandrian A.E., Bateman T.M., Belardinelli L., et al. Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging: results of the ADVANCE phase 3 multicenter international trial. J. Nucl. Cardiol.. 2007;14(5):645-658.

.

9 Tadehara F., Yamamoto H., Tsujiyama S., et al. Feasibility of a rapid protocol of 1-day single-isotope rest/adenosine stress Tc-99m sestamibi ECG-gated myocardial perfusion imaging. J. Nucl. Cardiol.. 2008;15(1):35-41.

10 Lavalaye J.M., Shroeder-Tanka J.M., Tiel-van Buul M.M., et al. Implementation of technetium-99m MIBI SPECT imaging guidelines: optimizing the two-day stress-rest protocol. Int. J. Card. Imaging. 1997;13:331-335.

11 Thorley P.J., Sheard K.L., Wright D.J., et al. The routine use of sublingual GTN with resting 99 Tcm-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion imaging. Nucl. Med. Commun.. 1998;19:937-942.

12 Travin M.I., Heller G.V., Johnson L.L., et al. The prognostic value of ECG-gated SPECT imaging in patients undergoing stress Tc-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging. J. Nucl. Cardiol.. 2004;11(3):253-262.

13 Schwaiger M., Melin J. Cardiological applications of nuclear medicine. Lancet. 1999;354:661-666.

14 Banzo I., Pena F.J., Allende R.H., et al. Prospective clinical comparison of non-corrected and attenuation- and scatter-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with suspicion of coronary artery disease. Nucl. Med. Commun.. 2003;24(9):995-1002.

15 Kim Y., Goto H., Kobayshi K., et al. A new method to evaluate ischemic heart disease: combined use of rest thallium-201 myocardial SPECT and Tc-99m exercise tetrofosmin first pass and myocardial SPECT. Ann. Nucl. Med.. 1999;13:147-153.