HEADACHE AND FACIAL PAIN

Published on 03/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurology

Last modified 03/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1833 times

chapter 9

Headache and Facial Pain

Headache is one of the commonest problems encountered in neurology. This chapter is not intended to be a comprehensive review of headache. The approach to the more common headache and facial pain syndromes encountered in clinical practice will be discussed. There are many excellent textbooks that contain more detailed information [15].

The various labels given to different types of headache have arisen from clinicians observing recurring patterns of similar symptoms in large number of patients in the absence of any gold standard for the diagnosis. Thus, the diagnosis of the cause of most headaches or facial pain is almost entirely dependent on a detailed and accurate history because, at this point in time, there are no diagnostic tests to confirm most of the common causes of headache such as migraine, cluster and tension-type headache. Imaging techniques such as computerised tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detect abnormalities that can explain the clinical presentation in only 2% of cases [6].

Consider the following case history:

Write down your diagnosis or diagnoses for Case 9.1 below before reading on.

Most students will say subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), some will say meningitis or migraine but in fact this young man had a hangover! All four diagnoses will result in headache, nausea, vomiting and photophobia. Although fever should differentiate SAH from meningitis, migraine and hangovers and neck stiffness should raise the suspicion of SAH or meningitis, occasionally patients with migraine complain of neck stiffness and rarely fever [7]. Similarly, if a young man had been out drinking heavily the night before, it would be wrong to assume he had a hangover if he experienced the thunderclap onset of severe generalised headache with nausea and vomiting as this is more in keeping with a SAH. This case reiterates the point made in Chapter 2, ‘The neurological history’, which is that the nature and distribution of symptoms DO NOT define the aetiology. The time course (mode of onset and subsequent progression of symptoms) will differentiate between these various entities, with the headache of SAH being of sudden onset and maximum severity at onset, whereas the headache of migraine, meningitis and that of a hangover will usually evolve over a variable period of time from minutes to hours.

The International Headache Society [8] classifies headaches as:

Most patients with headache fear they may have a brain tumour. Although headache is a common symptom of a brain tumour, brain tumour as a cause of headache is extremely rare [9].

The commonest causes are the primary headache syndromes such as episodic tension-type headache and migraine and the commonest secondary causes are a hangover and fever [10] (see Table 9.1).

WHAT QUESTIONS TO ASK

There are three scenarios (see Figure 9.1):

If you know the patient and the diagnosis and the patient says the headache is identical, it is not unreasonable to treat the patient’s headache accordingly. On the other hand, if you do not know the patient, or if the headache is different from those which the patient has had in the past, it is imperative that you treat this headache as if it were the first headache that the patient has ever experienced. When seeing a patient for the first time with a prior diagnosis of headache, do not assume that the previous diagnosis is correct. The lack of diagnostic tests to confirm most diagnoses means there is always a degree of uncertainty.

Use the technique below to obtain a blow-by-blow description, similar to that outlined in Chapter 2, ‘The neurological history’. Enquire what the patient was doing at the precise moment the headache commenced; what they had been doing just prior to this; what was the time from the onset of the headache until the headache reached its maximum severity; what were the exact nature, distribution and time taken to reach maximum intensity or extent of involvement of the body; what was the duration of all associated symptoms and the time they took to resolve, both individually and in relation to each other. Ascertaining the time taken to reach maximum intensity is the vital clue as to the likely pathological process.

Classical teaching has suggested students ask: whether the headache is unilateral or bilateral; constant or throbbing; frontal, temporal, parietal or occipital; made worse by straining, moving or coughing; whether it awakens the patient from sleep; and whether there is associated photophobia or phonophobia. In most instances the answers to these questions are unhelpful. As anyone who has suffered from migraine, tension-type headaches or hangovers will know, most of these features are non-specific (as highlighted in Case 9.1 above). Although migraine (see below) is typically a unilateral, throbbing headache associated with visual, gastrointestinal or neurological symptoms, it can be bilateral, constant and is not always accompanied by associated symptoms. Although trigeminal neuralgia is almost exclusively unilateral pain, cases of bilateral pain have been described and are more likely to represent symptomatic (underlying pathology other than compression of the nerve by a vascular loop) trigeminal neuralgia [11]. Similarly, cluster headache is unilateral but even here atypical cases with bilateral headache occur [1214].

Virtually all headaches are exacerbated by exercise, coughing, sneezing and straining. The exception is cluster headache where the patient often paces the floor or even hits their head on the wall in order to reduce the severity.

In everyday clinical practice if patients are simply asked to describe their headache(s), they often omit vital information.

Obtaining a detailed history

A recommended approach when taking a history is:

The phrase ‘and then what happened’ is one of the most useful questions to ask patients with episodic disturbances of neurological function; it ensures the patient does not omit any details. This approach often elucidates pieces of information that are the clues to the likely underlying pathological process, as discussed below.

Case 9.2 demonstrates the value of this history-taking technique.

The value of this method of obtaining histories can also be highlighted by re-examining the Case 9.1 which was described at the beginning of this chapter.

This is a typical history of someone with either migraine or suffering from a hangover. The presence of photopsia and neurological symptoms would indicate a likely diagnosis of migraine.

An alternative diagnosis becomes apparent in Case 9.3 who on the surface initially appears to present with identical symptoms.

CASE 9.3

A 26-year-old man presents with headache, nausea, vomiting, photophobia and phonophobia.

What were you doing at the time the headache first commenced?

‘I was sitting watching television.’

What had you been doing before?

‘Nothing, I was perfectly well until that time.’

What was the first thing you noticed and how long did it take from when you first noticed this symptom until it reached its maximum severity and then what happened?

‘I noticed flashing lights in my vision.’

Where in your vision?

‘They started on the left side.’

Then what happened?

‘They gradually enlarged and spread to the right side.’

How long did they take to spread to the right side?

‘Approximately 10–15 minutes.’

Then what happened?

‘Just as I thought I was getting better because the trouble with my vision was resolving, I developed a very severe headache all over my head.’

How long did it take from when you first noticed the headache until the headache reached its maximum severity?

‘Approximately 30 minutes. When the headache reached its maximum severity I began to feel nauseated and the light was hurting my eyes.’

Then what happened?

‘The nausea increased over the next 15 minutes.’

Then what happened?

‘Then I started to vomit and I vomited several times; every time I vomited my head felt worse.’

Then what happened?

‘I decided to come to the hospital for treatment.’

Have you ever had this headache before?

‘No.’

Is there a family history of migraine?

‘No.’

In this patient, symptoms evolved gradually with the initial symptoms disappearing before subsequent symptoms either developed or reached their maximum intensity, typical of a migraine. The last two questions would strengthen the diagnosis had the answer been yes, but remember that a past or a family history of migraine is circumstantial evidence (see Chapter 2, ‘The neurological history’).

In the next example, once again the initial presenting symptoms appear identical.

The diagnosis of SAH is inescapable when the exact mode of onset and progression of the headache and associated symptoms are established.

The above discussion would suggest that taking a history from patients with headache is easy. Unfortunately this is not always the case. The CT scan in Figure 9.2 is from a patient who was incapable of giving a detailed history because of the cognitive impairment resulting from the hydrocephalus. The patient complained of vague headache, non-descript blurring of vision and a change in her personality (her sister’s psychiatrist had diagnosed schizophrenia when her sister told him about her symptoms). The two clues to the underlying diagnosis were the fact that her legs gave way when her brother hugged her (this would have increased intrathoracic and intracranial pressure) and the presence of papilloedema when examined.

There are many different ways to approach patients with headache. The International Headache Society classification is into primary and secondary headache. In clinical practice when evaluating patients with headache there are three broad categories based on the rapidity of onset of the headache (see Figure 9.3).

The remainder of this chapter will initially discuss the approach to patients presenting with a single headache, followed by the approach to patients with recurrent headaches.

A SINGLE (OR THE FIRST) EPISODE OF HEADACHE

Sudden onset ‘thunderclap headache’

All these conditions have one thing in common and that is the sudden onset of severe headache. (The slight exception is the headache related to exertion or orgasm; see below.) What differentiates one from the other are the associated symptoms, the duration of the headache and, to a lesser extent, the circumstances under which the headache occurs. It is important to remember that the most lethal condition NOT to miss is a subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and that it can occur under any circumstances including when patients exert themselves, cough, sneeze or during sexual intercourse. There are extremely rare causes of sudden severe headache such as hydrocephalic attack with or without the presence of a third ventricular colloid cyst acting as a ball valve, and very rarely sudden onset headache may be the presenting symptom of aseptic or viral meningitis [15].

INTRACRANIAL HAEMORRHAGE

Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH): The single most important, although probably not the commonest, cause of sudden severe headache is SAH. SAH accounts for a little over 10% of patients presenting with sudden onset ‘thunder clap’ headache [15]. A minor bleed causing sudden headache may be the only warning of a subsequent severe and often fatal haemorrhage. If the haemorrhage also occurs into the parenchyma of the brain, there may be focal neurological symptoms. Patients often describe it as the worst headache of their life [16].

The headache of SAH is occipital or generalised and of sudden onset, reaching maximum severity within seconds. If the haemorrhage is of sufficient severity, there may be transient loss of consciousness or coma induced; this occurs in nearly 50% of patients [17]. There is severe nausea, vomiting, photophobia and neck stiffness from the moment of onset of the headache. Seizures may occur. The patient is obtunded and looks extremely ill. Photopsia is NOT a feature.

Clinical features do not always clearly distinguish other causes of headache from SAH [15, 18]. The presence or lack of accompanying symptoms like nausea, vomiting, photophobia and collapse at onset does not seem a reliable means of distinguishing between SAH and benign causes of acute headache [15].

In almost 20–40% of patients with SAH a warning leak (minor haemorrhage) may occur 1–8 weeks prior to a major SAH. The associated headache (referred to as a sentinel headache) is often short-lived and the patient may not seek immediate medical attention [19]. Even if the patient consults a physician the headache seems so trivial that often the diagnosis is missed [20]. Some of these patients are seen some days to weeks later [21] with the story of a sudden, explosive severe headache, usually in the absence of any other symptoms. The briefer the headache, the less likely it was related to a warning bleed. Here the question arises as to whether they have suffered a SAH and how extensively they should be investigated, and there is no easy answer to this question.

The probability of detecting an aneurysmal haemorrhage on CT scans performed at various intervals after the ictus is [9]:

The probability of detecting xanthochromia with spectrophotometry of the CSF at various times after a SAH is [9]:

Magnetic resonance angiography will detect aneurysms of > 3 mm in diameter and is recommended in patients with thunderclap headache with a low index of suspicion for SAH (normal CT scan and CSF) [9], as the risk of subsequent SAH is negligible [21, 22]. If the index of suspicion for SAH is high standard angiography should be performed.

A 3rd nerve palsy with a dilated pupil is a classic sign of a sentinel bleed.

COUGH, BENIGN EXERTIONAL, BENIGN SEX, ICE-CREAM AND ICE-PICK HEADACHEs

Although these headaches have a tendency to recur, they have one thing in common and that is the headache is of sudden onset and therefore they are discussed in this section.

Anybody who has suffered from a headache knows that coughing, sneezing or straining momentarily exacerbates the headache. Headache precipitated by coughing is referred to as cough headache. A similar headache can also be precipitated by anything that increases intrathoracic pressure such as sneezing, straining, laughing or stooping [24]. In the majority of patients with this headache, no structural pathology is present, although in as many as 25% it may be symptomatic (indicating the presence of an underlying pathology) with a significant proportion related to a Chiari malformation [25].

Exertional headache: Benign exertional headache is a bilateral, throbbing headache, lasting from 5 minutes to 24 hours specifically provoked by physical exercise and not associated with any systemic or intracranial disorder [28]. A small percentage of patients with exertional headache may have structural pathology [28]. This headache is of sudden onset (but not usually described as explosive in nature), generalised frontal or occipital and precipitated by activities such as weight lifting or any other activity that causes the patient to Valsalva. Similar to coital headache, there may be an antecedent dull occipital pain that builds up in severity over seconds to minutes as the intensity of the exercise increases and, if the person stops exerting themselves, this warning headache will resolve and they will not experience the sudden severe headache. The aetiology of this headache is unknown. Recurrent episodes may occur for weeks, occasionally months.

Benign sex (orgasmic or coital) headache: ‘Headache associated with sexual activity’ describes bilateral headaches precipitated by masturbation or coitus in the absence of any intracranial disorder [29, 30]. The headache is sudden in onset and excruciatingly severe, occurring at the moment of orgasm. It is predominantly occipital, but may be frontal or generalised. It is brief, lasting minutes, rarely hours. There are no associated symptoms. There is often a valuable clue that is not seen with SAH: the patient may experience a dull pain in the occipital or suboccipital region that increases in severity as excitement increases, subsides if they interrupt sexual activity and recurs if they become aroused again. If the patient interrupts sexual activity and avoids orgasm, this dull headache subsides without the subsequent severe explosive headache. If you can obtain a history of this headache preceding the sudden explosive headache, then the diagnosis is quite straightforward. On the other hand, if the history of this warning headache is not elicited, the major differential diagnosis, particularly if the headache lasts hours, is SAH. The aetiology of this headache is unclear but it is almost invariably seen in patients who are experiencing considerable stress in their lives and, once the stress resolves, so do the headaches.

Rarely, patients may experience their first SAH when coughing, sneezing, straining, exerting themselves or during sexual intercourse [25]. Here, although the headache will be explosive in onset, there will not be an antecedent warning headache in the seconds before the explosive headache, and the headache will persist for hours to days and is usually associated with nausea, vomiting, neck stiffness and possibly a focal neurological deficit and/or depression of the conscious state.

Ice-pick headache: Ice-pick headache is also termed ‘jabs and jolts’ and refers to a curious entity in which the patient experiences recurrent, brief stabbing pains, often localised to one part of the head, rarely in other parts of the body. The patient describes the pain as lancinating like a needle, a nail or an ice pick being stabbed into their scalp. The pain lasts seconds only, may occur as a single jab of pain or there may be many stabs of pain within seconds to a minute. The commonest site is the temples. The same site on the opposite side (mirror image) of the head may be similarly affected. Ice-pick headaches occur more commonly in patients with migraine, where they can occur during or before the migraine [33]. They are benign and do not represent any sinister underlying pathology; reassurance is all that is required.

Aseptic or viral meningitis: Very rarely, aseptic or viral meningitis may present with the very abrupt onset of severe headache [15]. The associated fever and sweats and the presence of an antecedent upper respiratory tract infection provide clues to the possible diagnosis, but a lumbar puncture may be required to differentiate aseptic meningitis from SAH.

Posture-induced headache

Severe headache on standing that resolves with lying flat is characteristic of a reduced cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure. This most often occurs after a lumbar puncture but may develop with a CSF leak, the so-called spontaneous low-pressure headache.

POST-LUMBAR PUNCTURE HEADACHE

The characteristic and pathognomonic feature is a headache that worsens within 15 minutes of standing and resolves within 30 minutes if the patient lies completely flat [8], particularly if the foot of the bed or the legs are elevated. If the patient lies down on several pillows the headache will be less severe but will not be abolished. It is important that the headache resolves as all headaches are usually less severe when a patient lies down. The headache can be dull or throbbing, frontal, occipital or generalised, worsened by coughing, sneezing and straining, i.e. non-specific features.

There is often neck discomfort; other associated symptoms include a change in hearing (hyperacusis), nausea, blurred vision, photophobia, horizontal diplopia, occasionally facial numbness, cognitive abnormalities and even coma. All these symptoms resolve when the patient lies completely flat.

The headache usually develops within 1 or 2 days of the lumbar puncture (LP) or epidural, although rare cases occurring 12 days later have been reported [34]. CSF pressures, by definition, are quite low and can be measured to confirm the diagnosis [35]. Although it usually resolves spontaneously, there are reports of it persisting for up to 19 months [36].

Post-LP headache occurs in as many as 30% of patients [37]. The incidence is reduced to as low as 5% when a smaller gauge needle is used, inserting the bevel parallel rather than at right angles to the fibres of the dura, the stylet is re-inserted before removing the needle or non-cutting (pencil-point) needles are used [38, 39]. There is no evidence that bedrest following an LP reduces the incidence of headache. The incidence is also not influenced by whether the LP is performed in the sitting or lying position or whether increased oral or IV fluids are administered. The volume of CSF removed does not increase the incidence of post-LP headache, thus there should be no hesitation in removing copious amounts of CSF for diagnostic purposes.

LOW-PRESSURE HEADACHE OR SPONTANEOUS INTRACRANIAL HYPOTENSION

The clinical features are identical to the headache seen after an LP. This headache relates to a leak of CSF either from the nose following a head injury (rarely a spontaneous leak) or, in the majority of patients, the leak is at the level of the spine, particularly the thoracic spine and cervicothoracic junction [35].

INVESTIGATION AND TREATMENT of LOW-PRESSURE AND POST-LP HEADACHE

Typical imaging findings consist of subdural fluid collections, pachymeningeal enhancement, pituitary hyperaemia and brain sagging on CT scans. MRI may be normal. Myelography or CSF isotope studies can often identify the CSF leak [35, 40] but are not necessary to make the diagnosis. Radioisotope cisternography typically shows absence of activity over the cerebral convexities, even at 24 or 48 hours, and early appearance of activity in the kidneys and urinary bladder.

Initial treatment is effective in as many as 85% of patients [41] and consists of lying the patient completely flat with the foot of the bed elevated, copious fluids (unproven benefit) and, if this fails, an epidural blood patch is often effective [42]. Occasionally more than one epidural blood patch may be required [43], up to as long as 19 months after the onset [36].

Headaches of gradual onset

Migraine, cluster and tension-type are the commonest headaches that develop gradually and these are discussed in the next section.

Cranial arteritis, bacterial meningitis and ethmoid sinusitis are three causes of headache of gradual onset that must not be missed.

CRANIAL ARTERITIS

Cranial arteritis (also known as giant cell or temporal arteritis as most often the temporal arteries are affected) is a vasculitis that distinctly targets large- and medium-sized arteries, preferentially the aorta and its extracranial branches, and in particular the temporal and occipital arteries [44]. This is a disorder of the older patient (the mean age is almost 75 [45]) and is rarely seen below the age of 50 [46]. It is more common in women and age-specific incidence rates increase with age [47]

Buy Membership for Neurology Category to continue reading. Learn more here