GYNECOLOGIC INJURIES

Published on 10/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Critical Care Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1701 times

CHAPTER 56 GYNECOLOGIC INJURIES

TRAUMA IN PREGNANCY

Gynecologic trauma includes a large variety of relatively rare and challenging injuries from blunt and penetrating mechanisms. While motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of major injury in pregnant women, penetrating trauma accounts for almost all injuries to the fallopian tubes, ovaries, and nongravid uterus. Pelvic fractures and straddle injuries often result in trauma to perineum, vagina, and less commonly the cervix and uterus. Injuries to the external genitalia are frequently associated with interpersonal violence and should be treated in that context.

In recent years, trauma has been recognized as the leading cause of death during pregnancy. As unsuspected pregnancy is relatively common in the reproductive years, this possibility must be considered when evaluating female trauma victims. Pregnancy produces significant physiologic and anatomic changes that must be recognized and understood by all health care providers treating pregnant trauma patients (Table 1).

Table 1 Changes in Maternal Physiology during Pregnancy

Change Consequence
Cardiac output and blood volume increase Shock after >40% of blood lost
Expansion of plasma volume Physiologic anemia
Decline in arterial and venous pressure Vital signs are not reflective of hemodynamic status
Increase of resting pulse  
Chest enlargement Change in anatomic landmarks
Caution during thoracic procedures (e.g., thoracostomy)
Diaphragm rise  
Substernal angle increase  
Decrease in functional residual capacity Rapid decline in PO2 during apnea or airway obstruction
Increase in oxygen consumption  
Airway closure when supine  
Increase in tidal volume and minute ventilation Fall in PCO2 and bicarbonates
Decrease in anesthetic requirements Need for adjustment of sedative doses
Decreased gastric motility Risk of aspiration
Relaxation of gastroesophageal sphincter  

Diagnosis

Care is undertaken with attention to both mother and fetus. Uterine blood flow lacks autoregulation and is related directly to maternal blood pressure; consequently, treatment priorities are the same as for the nonpregnant trauma patient, as the best initial treatment for the fetus is the optimal resuscitation of the mother. A thorough physical exam complemented by imaging studies is necessary to identify some of the unique problems that might be present in any pregnant patient, including blunt or penetrating injury to the uterus, placental abruption, amniotic fluid embolism, isoimmunization, or premature rupture of membranes.

Prehospital Care

As a result of significant changes in maternal physiology (see Table 1), supplemental oxygen should be administered to prevent maternal and fetal hypoxia during transport and in the resuscitation room. Fluid resuscitation should be initiated even in the absence of signs of hypovolemia and shock. To avoid supine hypotension associated with the uterine compression of the inferior vena cava (IVC), patients in the second or third trimester of pregnancy should be transported on a backboard tilted to the left, with special attention to immobilization of the cervical spine. If the patient is kept in a supine position, the right hip should be elevated 4–6 inches, and the uterus should be displaced manually to the left. This maneuver increases cardiac output by 30% and restores circulating blood volume. Although only about 10% of pregnant patients at term develop symptoms of shock in the supine position, fetal distress may be present even in normotensive mothers; therefore, right hip elevation should be maintained at all times including during operative procedures.

Hospital Care

Primary survey includes assessment of airway, breathing, and circulation (ABCs), including volume replacement and hemorrhage control. Secondary survey includes the obstetrical history, physical examination, and evaluation and monitoring of the fetus. The history should include the date of the last menstrual cycle, expected date of delivery, and any problems or complications of the current and previous pregnancies such as preterm labor or placental abruption. Comorbidities such as pregnancy-induced hypertension and diabetes mellitus should also be documented.

The abdominal examination is critically important, as is a determination of uterine size, which provides an approximation of gestational age and fetal maturity. A discrepancy between dates and uterine size suggests uterine hemorrhage or rupture. Uterine rupture is suspected with peritoneal signs, abdominal palpation of fetal parts due to extrauterine location, and inability to palpate the uterine fundus. However, as the uterus enlarges, it displaces the intestines upward and laterally, stretching the peritoneum and making the abdominal physical examination unreliable.

Determination of gestational age is particularly important because this will guide the decision for a premature delivery if indicated. Most institutions will accept a 24–26 week pregnancy as viable, with a probability of survival ranging from 20%–70%. Radiographic estimation of gestational age is bound to an error of 1–2 weeks. Unless the date of the conception is known exactly, gestational age is particularly difficult to determine. A good rule of thumb is to consider patients with a uterus halfway between the umbilicus and the costal margin as having a viable pregnancy (Figure 1). An algorithm for initial maternal and fetal assessment is presented in Figure 2.

image

Figure 2 Algorithm for initial maternal and fetal assessment. OB, Obstetrics; US, ultrasound; DPL, diagnostic peritoneal lavage; C-section, cesarean section.

(Adapted from Knudson MM, Rozycki GS, Paquin MM: Reproductive system trauma. In Moore EE, Feliciano DV, Mattox KL, editors: Trauma, 5th ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2004, pp. 851–875.)

Physical evaluation of the pregnant patient must be directed to the detection of the following six pregnancy-related acute conditions.

Radiographic Examination

There are three phases of radiation damage related to gestational age of the fetus. Before 3 weeks of gestation, during preimplantation and early implantation, exposure to radiation can result in death of the embryo. Between 3 and 16 weeks of gestation, during organogenesis, radiation can damage the developing fetal tube, resulting in anomalies in the central nervous system. After 16 weeks, neurologic defects are the most common complication. Prenatal radiation exposure may be associated with certain childhood cancers.

Although there is existing concern about radiation exposure during pregnancy, in most instances the benefits outweigh the risks. It is generally believed that exposure of the fetus to less than 5–10 rad causes no significant increase in the risk of congenital malformations, intrauterine growth retardation, or miscarriage. Radiation doses from common imaging studies are shown in Table 2. All indicated radiographic studies should be performed, as for nonpregnant patients (Figure 3). It is obvious that unnecessary duplication of studies should be avoided.

Table 2 Radiation Doses from Plain Radiographs and CT

Plain anteroposterior chest x-ray <0.005 rad
Pelvic x-ray <0.4 rad
CT scan of head (1-cm cuts) 0.05 rad
CT scan of upper abdomen (20 1-cm cuts) 3.0 rad
CT scan of lower abdomen (10 1-cm cuts) 3.0–9.0 rad

CT, Computed tomography.

Abdominal Evaluation

Evaluation of the abdomen in the pregnant patient may be challenging. Superior displacement of the viscera by the expanding uterus changes the anatomical relation of the intra-abdominal organs (Figure 4). Special attention is needed for patients with rib or pelvic fractures, unexplained hypotension, blood loss, hematuria, or altered sensorium caused by drugs, alcohol, or brain injury.

Focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) has a major role in the abdominal evaluation because it provides rapid detection of intra-abdominal and pericardial fluid in the mother as well as quick assessment of fetal condition. In the hemodynamically normal patient, abdominal CT scanning can also be done safely to evaluate both mother and fetus. If CT scan is necessary, both oral and intravenous contrast media should be administered as needed. The main drawback of a diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) is its invasiveness, although the procedure can be done safely and has the same sensitivity as in the nonpregnant patient. DPL should be performed above the umbilicus using an open technique.

The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Organ Injury Scale for gravid uterus is shown in Table 3.

Table 3 AAST-OIS for Gravid Uterus

Grade Injury Description AIS-90 Score
I Hematoma or contusion without placental abruption 2
II Superficial laceration <1 cm in depth or partial placental abruption <25% 3
III Deep laceration 1 cm in depth in second trimester or placental abruption 25% but <50%; deep laceration in third trimester 3–4
IV Laceration extending to the uterine artery; deep laceration 1 cm with 50% placental abruption 4
V Uterine rupture in second or third trimester; complete placental abruption 4–5

Surgical Treatment

Penetrating Injury

As the uterus grows and expands out of the pelvis, it becomes an easier target for penetrating trauma. The thick density of its musculature allows the uterus to absorb energy from low-velocity penetrating injuries; maternal death is very uncommon except for injuries in the upper abdomen, which usually produce severe maternal damage. Gunshot wounds cause fetal injuries in 60%–70% of cases, with fetal death in 40%–65%. If the bullet has penetrated the uterus and the fetus is viable, cesarean section is indicated. Indications for C-section at celiotomy are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4 Indications for C-Section during Laparotomy for Trauma

Perimortem C-section is indicated in the case of maternal death if the fetus is viable (24 weeks). Timing is critical, as the probability of fetal survival is excellent when delivery occurs within 5 minutes or less of maternal demise. As the time increases, the chance of survival diminishes. In the rare situation where the mother is declared brain dead but maintains good vital signs, the fetus can be allowed to mature before delivery (Figure 5).

When performing an emergency C-section on a trauma patient, instead of the commonly used transverse incision, a vertical incision through all the layers into the uterus is safer and faster. This incision avoids injury to the uterine vessels, which enter the uterus from both sides.

Between gestational age 24–32 weeks, open cardiac massage (OCM) without aortic cross clamping should be seriously considered before an emergency C-section is performed. If OCM proves successful, the delivery may be delayed so that chances of postnatal survival improve. A proposed algorithm for emergency C-section after trauma is presented in Figure 6.

image

Figure 6 Algorithm for emergency cesarean section after trauma. C-section, Cesarean section; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

(Adapted from Morris JA Jr, Rosenbower TJ, Jurkovich GJ, et al: Infant survival after cesarean section for trauma. Ann Surg 223:481–488, 1996.)

TRAUMA TO NONGRAVID UTERUS AND FEMALE GENITALIA

There is a relative abundance of information on trauma in pregnancy and a relative paucity regarding injuries to the female genitalia. Although these injuries are uncommon in the nonpregnant patient, they are more often seen in cases where there is pathologic enlargement of the internal genitalia or in the early postpartum period. Missed or improperly treated female genital injuries can result in hemorrhage, sepsis, and loss of endocrine and reproductive function.

Diagnosis

Initial assessment and resuscitation are performed as for any trauma patient. The secondary survey should include a detailed physical examination of the perineum. Examination under anesthesia may be needed for patients with severe pain or active bleeding. A complete examination should include bimanual palpation and speculum examinations of vagina and anorectum. Some authors recommend anesthesia for all patients with perineal trauma in order to evaluate the extent of the injury.

Intra-abdominal genital injuries are usually diagnosed at laparotomy for associated injuries. As blunt injury is more common with pathologically enlarged internal genitalia in the nongravid patient, CT scan of the abdomen or DPL may aid the diagnosis, although the latter is very rarely used. Detailed grading of gynecologic injuries is presented in Tables 6 through 10.

Table 6 AAST-OIS for Gynecologic Injuries: Vagina

Grade Injury Description AIS-90 Score
I Contusion or hematoma 1
II Superficial laceration involving mucosa 1
III Deep laceration extending into submucosal fat or muscle 2
IV Complex laceration extending into the cervix or peritoneum 3
V Injury to adjacent organs 3

American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST).

Modified from Moore EE, Jurkovich GJ, Knudson MM, et al: Organ injury scaling VI: extrahepatic biliary, esophagus, stomach, vulva, vagina, uterus (nonpregnant), uterus (pregnant), fallopian tube, and ovary. J Trauma 39(6):1069–1070, 1995.

Table 7 AAST-OIS for Gynecologic Injuries: Vulva

Grade Injury Description AIS-90 Score
I Hematoma or contusion 1
II Superficial laceration involving skin only 1
III Deep laceration extending into subcutaneous fat or muscle 2
IV Avulsion of skin, fat, or muscle 3
V Injury to adjacent organs 3

American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST).

Modified from Moore EE, Jurkovich GJ, Knudson MM, et al: Organ injury scaling VI: extrahepatic biliary, esophagus, stomach, vulva, vagina, uterus (nonpregnant), uterus (pregnant), fallopian tube, and ovary. J Trauma 39(6):1069–1070, 1995.

Table 8 AAST-OIS for Gynecologic Injuries: Nongravid Uterus

Grade Injury Description AIS-90 Score
I Hematoma or contusion 2
II Superficial laceration <1 cm in depth 2
III Deep laceration 1 cm in depth 3
IV Laceration extending to uterine artery 3
V Devascularization or avulsion 3

American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST).

Modified from Moore EE, Jurkovich GJ, Knudson MM, et al: Organ injury scaling VI: extrahepatic biliary, esophagus, stomach, vulva, vagina, uterus (nonpregnant), uterus (pregnant), fallopian tube, and ovary. J Trauma 39(6):1069–1070, 1995

Table 9 AAST-OIS for Gynecologic Injuries: Fallopian Tube

Grade Injury Description AIS-90 Score
I Hematoma or contusion 2
II Laceration involving <50% of circumference 2
III Laceration involving 50% of circumference 2
IV Complete transection 2
V Devascularized segment 2

American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST).

Modified from Moore EE, Jurkovich GJ, Knudson MM, et al: Organ injury scaling VI: extrahepatic biliary, esophagus, stomach, vulva, vagina, uterus (nonpregnant), uterus (pregnant), fallopian tube, and ovary. J Trauma 39(6):1069–1070, 1995

Table 10 AAST-OIS for Gynecologic Injuries: Ovary

Grade Injury Description AIS-90 Score
I Contusion or hematoma 1
II Superficial laceration <0.5 cm in depth 2
III Deep laceration 0.5 cm in depth 3
IV Partial disruption of blood supply 3
V Complete parenchymal disruption or avulsion 3

American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST).

Modified from Moore EE, Jurkovich GJ, Knudson MM, et al: Organ injury scaling VI: extrahepatic biliary, esophagus, stomach, vulva, vagina, uterus (nonpregnant), uterus (pregnant), fallopian tube, and ovary. J Trauma 39(6):1069–1070, 1995.

SELECTED REFERENCES

1 Petrone P, Asensio JA. Trauma in pregnancy: assessment and treatment. Scand J Surg. 2006;95:4-10.

2 G Desjardins: Management of the injured pregnant patient. Resuscitation. http://www.trauma.org/archive/resus/pregnancytrauma.html

3 Fildes J, Reed L, Jones N, et al. Trauma: the leading cause of maternal death. J Trauma. 1992;32:643-645.

4 Lavery JP, Staten-McCormick M. Management of moderate to severe trauma in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1995;22:69-90.

5 Weiss HB. Pregnancy-associated injury hospitalizations in Pennsylvania, 1995. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34:626-636.

6 Weiss HB, Songer TJ, Fabio A. Fetal deaths related to maternal injury. JAMA. 2001;286:1863-1868.

7 Leggon RE, Wood GC, Indeck MC. Pelvic fractures in pregnancy: factors influencing maternal and fetal outcomes. J Trauma. 2002;53(4):796-804.

8 Guth AA, Patcher HL. Domestic violence and the trauma surgeon. Am J Surg. 2000;179:134-140.

9 McFarlane J, Parker B, Soeken K, Bullock L. Assessing for abuse during pregnancy. Severity and frequency of injuries and associated entry into prenatal care. JAMA. 1992;267:3176-3178.

10 ACS Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT). Trauma in women. Advanced Trauma Life Support Manual. 6th ed. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 1997.

11 Lavin JPJr, Polsky SS. Abdominal trauma during pregnancy. Clin Perinatol. 1983;10:423-438.

12 Green JR. Placenta previa and abruption placentae. In: Creasey RK, Resnik R, editors. Maternal-Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1994:604.

13 Sandy EAJr, Koerner M. Self inflicted gunshot wound to the pregnant abdomen: report of a case and review of the literature. Am J Perinatol. 1989;6:30-31.

14 Higgins SD. Trauma in pregnancy. J Perinatol. 1988;8:288-292.

15 Selden BS, Burke TJ. Complete maternal and fetal recovery after prolonged cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med. 1988;17:346-349.

16 Clark SL, Cotton DB, Pivarnik JM, Lee W, Hankins GD, Benedetti TJ, Phelan JP. Positional change and central hemodynamic profile during normal third trimester pregnancy and postpartum. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164:883-887.

17 Knudson MM, Rozycki GS, Paquin MM. Reproductive system trauma. In: Moore EE, Feliciano DV, Mattox KL, editors. Trauma. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2004:851-875.

18 Eliot G, Rao D. Pregnancy and radiographic examination. In: Haycock CE, editor. Trauma and Pregnancy. Littleton, MA: PSG Publishing; 1985:69-78.

19 Harvey EB, Boice JDJr, Honeyman M, Flannery JT. Prenatal x-ray exposure and childhood cancer in twins. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:541-545.

20 Kaunitz AM, Hughes JM, Grimes DA, et al. Causes of maternal mortality in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;65:605-612.

21 Wessells H, Aninch J. Injuries to the urogenital tract. In: American College of Surgeons: ACS Surgery Principles and Practice. New York: Web MD; 2005:1080-1085.