Gout and hyperuricaemia

Published on 02/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Basic Science

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1444 times

54 Gout and hyperuricaemia

Introduction

Gout is the most common inflammatory joint disease in men and the most common inflammatory arthritis in older women. It is caused by deposition of monosodium urate crystals in joints and soft tissues following chronic hyperuricaemia. Chronic hyperuricaemia is associated with disorders of purine metabolism due to under excretion or over production of uric acid, the final metabolite of endogenous and dietary purine metabolism. Gout usually presents as a monoarthritis in the first metatarsophalangeal joint (big toe) of the foot and is often referred to as podagra (from the Greek ‘seizing the foot’). Subsequent attacks may be polyarticular. Other commonly affected joints include the mid-foot, ankle, knee, wrist and finger joints. Although the attack is extremely painful, it is usually self-limiting resolving spontaneously in 1–2 weeks. Acute attacks are managed with rest, ice and one of the following pharmacological agents: NSAIDs, colchicine or corticosteroids. Some patients may only ever experience one attack, but often a second attack occurs within 6–12 months, with increased risk of subsequent attacks. Patients with recurrent attacks require long-term prophylaxis with drugs that lower the serum urate level. The drug of choice is usually allopurinol, however, a small percentage of patients are unable to tolerate allopurinol and require treatment with an alternative urate-lowering agent such as febuxostat or a uricosuric agent such as benzbromarone, sulphinpyrazone or probenecid. It is essential that pharmacological measures are combined with non-pharmacological measures such as dietary and lifestyle modification to prevent recurrent attacks. Inappropriate management of gout can result in chronic tophaceous gout with polyarticular, destructive low-grade joint inflammation, joint deformity and tophi.

Epidemiology

Gout is one of the oldest recognised diseases and was identified by the Egyptians in 2460 BC. Hippocrates described it as ‘arthritis of the rich’ due to the association with certain foods and alcohol. Gout affects 1–2% of adults in developed countries, and in recent decades there has been a significant rise in its prevalence and incidence (Zhang et al., 2006). The USA has seen a doubling in the number of cases with the rate of gout increasing to 4.1% in older males. However, unlike the rest of the world, prevalence in the UK appears not to be rising and from 2000 to 2005 remained at 1.4% (Rider and Jordan, 2010). The increasing numbers in many developed countries have been attributed to trends in lifestyle leading to increased risk of gout, for example, obesity, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, alcohol consumption and increased age of the general population. Although the Maori population have a marked genetic predisposition to gout, prior to 1700 they did not experience this inflammatory joint disease. It was changes in diet and lifestyle following European settlement that led to the appearance and increasing prevalence in the country. New Zealand now has probably the highest prevalence in the World with one in eight men affected (Richette and Bardin, 2010). A similar pattern has also been seen in Eastern China, where gout was considered a very rare disease in the 1980s. Changes in diet and lifestyle due to Western influences have seen its prevalence rise to 1.1% in Eastern China in 2008.

In the UK, the presentation of gout in men before the age of 45 years is unusual, but in those over the age of 75 years prevalence is greater than 7% in men and 4% in women (Doherty, 2009; Jordan et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2006). Gout is predominantly a disease of men with a male to female ratio of 3.6:1. In women, it tends to develop after menopause when levels of oestrogen, a known uricosuric, fall.

Although environmental factors are clearly implicated in the development of gout, studies have shown that inheritance also plays an important role. In recent years, research into the genetic background of gout has identified several renal urate transporters including URAT-1 and GLUT-9 and the genes that encode them, for example, SLC22A12 and SLC2A9, respectively. Polymorphisms in these genes are associated with increased hyperuricaemia and gout (Dalbeth and Merriman, 2009; Doherty, 2009).

Pathophysiology

Uric acid is mainly a by-product from the breakdown of cellular nucleoproteins and purine nucleotides synthesised de novo with about a third coming from the breakdown of dietary purine intake (Fig. 54.1). Uric acid is a weak acid with a pKa of 5.75, and at the physiological pH of the extra-cellular compartment 98% of uric acid is in the ionised form of urate. This is mainly present as monosodium urate due to the high concentration of sodium in the extra-cellular compartment. Human beings and higher primates lack the enzyme uricase that degrades uric acid to the highly soluble allantoin resulting in higher concentrations of urate close to the level of solubility. Monosodium urate has a solubility limit of 380 µmol/L; when the concentration exceeds 380 µmol/L, there is a risk of precipitation and the formation of monosodium urate crystals.

The production of urate is dependent upon the balance between purine ingestion, de novo synthesis in the cells and the actions of xanthine oxidase at the distal end of the purine pathway. Xanthine oxidase is the enzyme that catalyses the oxidation of hypoxanthine, the breakdown product from the catabolism of cellular nucleoproteins and purine nucleotides, to xanthine and xanthine to uric acid.

Gout can be classified as primary or secondary, depending on the presence or absence of an identified cause of hyperuricaemia.

Primary gout is not a consequence of an acquired disorder, but is associated with rare inborn errors of metabolism and isolated renal tubular defects in the fractional clearance of uric acid. A rare group of enzyme defects result in an increased de novo purine synthesis such as hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase deficiency (Lesch-Nyhan syndrome), phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate synthetase super activity, glucose-6 phosphatase deficiency and myogenic hyperuricaemia (Table 54.1).

Table 54.1 Causes of primary and secondary gout

Primary gout Secondary gout
Idiopathic
Rare enzyme deficiencies
Hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase deficiency (HPRT)
Phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate synthetase super-activity
Ribose-5-phosphate
AMP-deaminase deficiency
Increased uric acid production
Lymphoproliferative/Myeloproliferative
Chronic haemolytic anaemias
Secondary polycythemia
Severe exfoliative psoriasis
Gaucher’s disease
Cytotoxic drugs
Glucose-6 phosphate deficiency
High purine diet overproduction
Reduced uric acid secretion
Renal failure
Hypertension
Drugs (diuretics, aspirin, ciclosporin)
Lead nephropathy
Alcohol
Down’s Syndrome
Myxoedema
Beryllium poisoning

Secondary gout is the consequence of the use of specific drugs or develops as a consequence of other disorders. Certain diseases are associated with enhanced nucleic acid turnover, for example, myeloproliferative and lymphoproliferative disorders, psoriasis and haemolytic anaemia, and can lead to hyperuricaemia. Renal mechanisms are responsible for the majority of hyperuricaemia in individuals with over production representing less than 10% of patients with gout. The kidney excretes about two-thirds of the uric acid produced daily with the remainder being eliminated via the biliary tract with subsequent conversion to soluble allantoin by colonic bacterial uricase. Approximately 90% of the daily load of urate filtered by the kidneys is re-absorbed. This re-absorption process is mediated by specific anion transporters such as URAT-1 which is located on the apical side of the renal proximal tubular cells and is an important determinant of urate re-absorption (Richette and Bardin, 2010). The URAT-1 transporter is targeted by a number of drugs including benzbromarone, probenecid, losartan and sulphinpyrazone.

Risk factors

Hyperuricaemia is one of the main risk factors for gout and occurs in about 15–20% of the population (Doherty, 2009). Fortunately, only a minority of individuals with increased serum uric acid levels develop gout suggesting the importance of other contributing factors (Box 54.1).

Alcohol

Increased daily consumption of alcohol is associated with a higher risk of gout. Beer carries the greatest risk, probably due to its high purine content, followed by spirits. However, a moderate consumption of wine is not associated with an increased risk of developing gout (Jordan et al., 2007). The mechanism of action involved is thought to be the metabolism of ethanol to acetyl coenzyme A leading to adenine nucleotide degradation, with resultant increased formation of adenosine monophosphate, a precursor of uric acid. Alcohol also raises lactic acid levels in blood, which inhibits uric acid excretion.

Medication

A number of drugs are associated with increased uric acid levels (Box 54.2). The use of both loop and thiazide diuretics is the most common modifiable risk factor for secondary gout, especially in the elderly. It is thought loop and thiazide diuretics may precipitate an attack via volume depletion and reduced renal tubular secretion of uric acid. Aspirin has a bimodal effect; low doses inhibit uric acid excretion and increase urate levels, while doses greater than 3 g/day are uricosuric.

The prescribing of ciclosporin in organ transplant patients is an independent risk factor for new-onset gout in this group. The proposed mechanism of action is the interaction of ciclosporin with the hOAT10 transporter that mediates urate/glutathione exchange in the kidney (Bahn et al., 2008). Radiotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with neoplastic disorders can cause hyperuricaemia because of increased cell breakdown; to overcome this, prophylactic treatment may be given with allopurinol, commencing 3 days before therapy.

Presentation and diagnosis

An acute attack of gout has a rapid onset, with pain being maximal at 6–24 h of onset and spontaneously resolving within several days or weeks. The first attack usually affects a single joint in the lower limbs in 85–90% of cases, most commonly the first metatarsophalangeal joint (big toe). The next most frequent joints to be affected are the mid-tarsi, ankles, knees and arms. The affected joint is hot, red and swollen with shiny overlying skin. Even the touch of a sheet on the affected joint is too painful for the patient to bear. The patient may also have a fever, leucocytosis, raised erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and the attack may also be preceded by prodromal symptoms such as anorexia, nausea or change in mood. Following resolution of the attack, there may be pruritis and desquamation of the overlying skin on the affected joint.

Monosodium urate crystals preferentially form in cartilage and fibrous tissues where they are protected from contact with inflammatory mediators. The deposition of crystals may continue for months or years without causing symptoms; it is only when the crystals are shed into the joint space or bursa that inflammatory reaction occurs precipitating an acute attack of gout. The shedding of crystals can be triggered by a number of factors including direct trauma, dehydration, acidosis or rapid weight loss. The acute phase response associated with intercurrent illness or surgery may also precipitate an attack; during this phase, there is increased urinary urate excretion with a lowering of serum uric acid which leads to partial dissolution of monosodium urate crystals and subsequent shedding of crystals into the joint space.

The shed crystals are phagocytosed by monocytes and macrophages, activating the NACHT–LRR–PYD-containing protein-3 (NALP3) inflammasome and triggering the release of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and other cytokines, a subsequent infiltration of neutrophils and the symptoms of an acute attack (Dalbeth and Haskard, 2005). The NALP3 inflammasome (cryopyrin) is a complex of intracellular proteins that is activated on exposure to microbial elements, such as bacterial RNA and toxins. Activation of NALP3 leads to the release of caspase-1, which is required for cleavage of pro-IL-1β to active IL-1β (Richette and Bardin, 2009). IL-1β has been shown to be critically associated with the inflammatory response induced by monosodium urate crystals (Rider and Jordan, 2010).

A third of patients will have normal uric acid concentrations during an acute attack of gout due to increased urinary urate excretion. The most appropriate time to measure serum urate for monitoring purposes is when the attack has completely resolved. The gold standard for the diagnosis of gout is the demonstration of urate crystals in synovial fluid or in a tophus by polarised light microscopy (Zhang et al., 2006). Crystals may be found in fluid aspirated from non-inflamed joints, even in those joints which have not previously experienced an attack. The crystals are large (10–20 μm) and needle shaped with a strong, intense, characteristic light pattern under polarised light. In contrast, the calcium pyrophosphate dehydrate crystals associated with pseudo-gout are small rhomboid crystals of low intensity. Gout and septic arthritis may co-exist and in order to exclude septic arthritis synovial fluid is sent for Gram staining and culture.

Course of disease

The course of gout follows a number of stages; initially, the patient may be asymptomatic with a raised serum uric acid level (Fig. 54.2). Some patients may only ever experience one attack, but often a second attack occurs within 6–12 months. Subsequent attacks tend to be of longer duration, affect more than one joint and may spread to the upper limbs. Untreated disease can result in chronic tophaceous gout, with persistent low-grade inflammation in a number of joints resulting in joint damage and deformity. The disease is characterised by the presence of tophi (Fig. 54.3), monosodium urate crystals surrounded by chronic mononuclear and giant-cell reactions. Tophi deposition can occur anywhere in the body, but they are commonly seen on the helix of the ear, within and around the toe or finger joints, on the elbow, around the knees or on the Achilles tendons. The skin overlying the tophi may ulcerate and extrude white, chalky material composed of monosodium urate crystals.

Treatment

The management of gout can be split into the rapid resolution of the initial acute attack and long-term measures to prevent future episodes (see Box 54.3).

Gout is often associated with other medical problems including obesity, hypertension, excessive alcohol and the metabolic syndrome of insulin resistance, hyperinsulinaemia, impaired glucose intolerance and hypertriglyceridaemia. This contributes to the increased cardiovascular risk and deterioration of renal function seen in patients with gout. Management is not only directed at alleviating acute attacks and preventing future attacks, but also identifying and treating other co-morbid conditions such as hypertension and hyperlipidaemia. Pharmacological measures should be combined with non-pharmacological measures such as weight loss, changes in diet, increased exercise and reduced alcohol consumption.

Management of an acute attack

Drugs used in the management of an acute attack include NSAIDs, colchicine and corticosteroids. NSAIDs are the recommended first-line agents, but in a number of patients their use is contraindicated and a second-line agent is indicated (Box 54.4). Where the pain is not adequately controlled by treatment, paracetamol and weak opiate analgesics, for example, codeine or dihydrocodeine may be added to the regimen to provide additional relief. Treatment should be continued until the attack is terminated, usually between 1 and 2 weeks. The affected joints should also be rested for 1–2 days and initially treated with ice which has a significant analgesic effect during an acute attack.

A complete medication review should be performed, and ideally medication which is likely to have contributed to the attack discontinued. Where loop and thiazide diuretics are being used for the management of hypertension alone, an alternative anti-hypertensive agent should be considered according to national guidance. Losartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker effective in hypertension, has been shown to have uricosuric properties and is a suitable agent in hypertensive patients with gout (Sica and Schoolwerth, 2002; Takahashi et al., 2003). In patients with heart failure, diuretics are often essential and cannot be discontinued. Certain NSAIDs may be preferable in patients on diuretics with both indometacin and azapropazone (no longer licensed in the UK) demonstrating an increase uric acid secretion. Moreover, the diuretic effect of furosemide appears unaffected by azapropazone and azapropazone’s ability to promote uric acid secretion is sustained (Williamson et al., 1984).

Allopurinol should not be commenced during an acute attack as it may prolong or precipitate another attack. However, in patients already established on allopurinol therapy, allopurinol should always be continued during the attack. Aspirin at analgesic doses (600–2400 mg/day) should be avoided as it blocks urate secretion. The continuation or initiation of low-dose aspirin (75–150 mg/day) is recommended in patients with cardiac disease as the benefits outweigh the minimal effect on serum uric acid levels.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Maximum doses of an NSAID should be commenced rapidly after the onset of an attack and then tapered 24 h after the complete resolution of symptoms. The usual treatment period is 1–2 weeks. NSAIDs act by direct inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase-1 (COX-1) and cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) via blockade of the cyclo-oxgenase enzyme site. The subsequent inhibition of prostaglandin production reduces inflammation, but also results in additional activities on platelet aggregation, renal homeostasis and gastric mucosal integrity.

Although the NSAIDs differ in chemical structure, they all have similar pharmacological properties in terms of anti-inflammatory and analgesic action, and have similar drug interactions. For a number of years, indometacin was considered the NSAID of choice in gout largely because it was one of the first NSAIDs shown to be effective in the management of gout. However, it has not been shown to be of superior efficacy or safety when compared to other NSAIDs used in the management of acute gout (Jordan et al., 2007).

Azapropazone (1200–1800 mg/day) has been shown to have both anti-inflammatory and uricosuric effects during an acute attack. Unfortunately, use is associated with a higher risk of upper gastro-intestinal side effects when compared to other high-dose NSAIDs (diclofenac, ibuprofen, naproxen, indometacin and ketoprofen), and this significantly restricts its use.

Overall, there is no convincing evidence to promote the use of one NSAID over another in the management of acute gout.

In an effort to reduce the side effects of NSAIDs, and particularly the gastro-intestinal side effects, agents were developed to selectively block COX-2 and have minimal effect on COX-1. COX-2 selective agents are recommended for use in patients who are at high risk of developing gastro-intestinal side effects, but they are not recommended for routine use. It should be noted that the selective benefit of COX-2 inhibitors is lost in patients taking low dose aspirin. The selective COX-2 inhibitor etoricoxib in a daily dose of 120 mg has been shown to give comparable rapid relief of pain in acute gout to indometacin 50 mg three times daily but with fewer side effects (Schumacher et al., 2002). However, a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies involving etoricoxib have demonstrated an increased risk of cardiovascular thromboembolic events (Aldington et al., 2005). Although there are currently no data directly comparing the cardiovascular risk associated with selective and non-selective NSAIDs, it is recommended that the use of COX-2 inhibitors is avoided in patients with established heart disease, cerebrovascular disease or peripheral vascular disease.

NSAIDs should be avoided in patients with heart failure, renal insufficiency and a history of gastric ulceration. Care should also be exercised in elderly patients with multiple pathologies. When prescribing an NSAID, the need for gastric protection should be considered in patients at increased risk of a peptic ulcer, bleed or perforation.

Colchicine

Colchicine is an alkaloid derived from the autumn crocus (colchicum autumnale) and has been reported to have been used in the treatment of gout since the 6th century AD. Colchicine has a slower onset of action than NSAIDs but is recommended in patients where NSAIDs are contraindicated. It should be started as soon as possible after the onset of an attack.

Although the mode of action of colchicine in gout is not fully understood, it is thought to arrest microtubule assembly in neutrophils and inhibit many cellular functions. It suppresses monosodium urate crystal-induced NALP3 inflammasome-driven caspase-1 activation, IL-1β processing and release, and L-selectin expression on neutrophils. Colchicine also blocks the release of a crystal-derived chemotactic factor from neutrophil lysosomes, blocks neutrophil adhesion to endothelium by modulating the distribution of adhesion molecules on the endothelial cells and inhibits monosodium urate crystal-induced production of superoxide anions from neutrophils (Nuki, 2008).

Although widely used, there are few studies that demonstrate the efficacy of colchicine. A single, randomised, controlled trial has compared the benefits of colchicine to placebo in acute gouty flare (Ahern et al., 1987). Patients were given 1 mg of colchicine followed by 500 μcg every 2 h until the attack stopped or they felt too ill to continue taking colchicine. Colchicine was found to be superior to placebo with an absolute reduction of 34% for pain and a 30% reduction in clinical symptoms such as palpation, swelling, redness and pain. The number needed to treat (NNT) with colchicine to reduce pain was 3 and the NNT to reduce clinical symptoms was 2. All participants given colchicine experienced gastro-intestinal side effects such as diarrhoea and/or vomiting. There are no studies comparing colchicine to either NSAIDs or corticosteroids in an acute flare of gout.

The current dose of colchicine licensed for the management of an acute attack of gout is 1 mg initially, followed by 500 μcg every 2–3 h until relief of pain is obtained or vomiting or diarrhoea occurs. A maximum of 6 mg should be given per course and treatment should not be repeated within 3 days. This dosage regimen frequently causes diarrhoea and other toxic side effects, particularly in elderly patients (Morris et al., 2003; Terkeltaub et al., 2008). It is therefore recommended that a dose of 500 μcg given twice or four times a day should be used to reduce toxicity. Intravenous colchicine is no longer licensed in the UK because use has been associated with a number of fatalities (2% mortality rate).

Common side effects associated with colchicine are abdominal cramps, nausea, vomiting, and rarely bone marrow suppression, neuropathy and myopathy. Side effects are more common in patients with hepatic or renal impairment. The dose of colchicine should be reduced in mild to moderate renal impairment, for example creatinine clearance 10–50 mL/min, and it should not be used in patients with severe renal impairment, for example creatinine clearance less than 10 mL/min. Care should also be exercised in patients with chronic heart failure due to colchicine’s ability to constrict blood vessels and stimulate central vasomotor centres.

Colchicine is metabolised by CYP3A4 and excreted by p-glycoprotein; toxicity can be caused by drugs that interact with its metabolism and clearance, and this includes macrolides, ciclosporin and protease inhibitors. The absorption of vitamin B12 may be impaired by chronic administration of high doses of colchicine.

Corticosteroids

Corticosteroids are usually considered where use of an NSAID or colchicine is contraindicated or in refractory cases. They may be given intravenously, intramuscularly or direct into a joint (intra-articular) when only one or two joints are affected. In patients with a monoarthritis, an intra-articular corticosteroid injection is highly effective in treating an attack.

Intramuscular triamcinolone acetonide 60 mg has been shown to be as safe and effective as indometacin 50 mg three times daily in treating an acute attack of gout with earlier resolution of symptoms in the steroid group (Alloway et al., 1993). Common doses of intra-articular steroids are 80 mg of methylprednisolone acetate for a large joint such as a knee; 40 mg of methylprednisolone acetate or 40 mg of triamcinolone acetonide for a smaller joint such as a wrist or elbow. Oral prednisolone 30 mg daily for 5 days has also been shown to be equally efficacious to indometacin 50 mg three times a day for 2 days or 25 mg three times a day for 3 days plus paracetamol and has fewer adverse events (Man et al., 2007). Oral steroid regimens used in practice include prednisolone 30 mg daily for 1–3 days with subsequent dose tapering over 1–2 weeks. Intramuscular steroid injections (methylprednisolone acetate 80–120 mg) may sometimes be used to prevent the precipitation of a flare on initiation of prophylactic treatment for gout. Corticosteroids may have fewer adverse events than other acute treatments when used short term, particularly in the elderly.

Interleukin-1 inhibitors

IL-1β is critically associated with the inflammatory response induced by monosodium urate crystals (Rider and Jordan, 2010). Anakinra, an IL-1 receptor antagonist, has been shown to reduce the pain of gout and bring about complete resolution by day 3 in the majority of patients after a course of three 100-mg subcutaneous injections (McGonagle et al., 2007; So et al. 2007). Other IL-1 inhibitors, such as rilonacept, are under development.

Management of chronic gout

The presence of hyperuricaemia is not an indication to commence prophylactic therapy. Some patients may only experience a single episode and a change in lifestyle, diet or concurrent medication may be sufficient to prevent further attacks. Patients who suffer one or more acute attacks within 12 months of the first attack should normally be prescribed prophylactic urate-lowering therapy (see Fig. 54.4). There are, however, some groups of patients where prophylactic therapy should be instigated after a single attack. These include individuals with uric acid stones, the presence of tophi at first presentation and young patients with a family history of renal or cardiac disease. The criteria for starting prophylactic therapy for gout is detailed in Box 54.5.

The aim of prophylactic gout treatment is to maintain the serum urate level below the saturation point of monosodium urate (300 μmol/L). If the serum urate is maintained below this level, crystal deposits dissolve and gout is controlled. Prophylactic treatment should not be initiated until an acute attack of gout has completely resolved, usually 2–3 weeks after symptom resolution. Once started, prophylactic treatment should be continued indefinitely even if further acute attacks develop.

Drugs that lower serum uric acid can be classified into three groups according to their pharmacological mode of action (Box 54.6).

Uricostatic agents

Uricostatic agents act on the enzyme xanthine oxidase. Xanthine oxidase catalyses the oxidation of hypoxanthine to xanthine and subsequently xanthine to uric acid (Fig. 54.1). Hypoxanthine comes from the catabolism of cellular nucleoproteins and purine nucleotides. Blocking the action of this enzyme reduces the production of uric acid. Agents in this group include allopurinol and febuxostat.

Allopurinol

Allopurinol is the prophylactic agent of choice in the management of recurrent gout. In order to become pharmacologically active, allopurinol must be metabolised by the liver to oxypurinol. Oxypurinol has a much longer half-life than allopurinol, 14–16 h compared to 2 h. Both allopurinol and oxypurinol are renally excreted, with oxypurinol undergoing re-absorption from the renal tubule. In patients with reduced renal function, the half-life of oxypurinol is increased with the risk of accumulation and toxicity. It is, therefore, essential that a patient’s renal function is checked prior to the prescribing of allopurinol and the dose adjusted accordingly (Table 54.2).

Table 54.2 Recommended dose of allopurinol in patients with diminished renal function

Creatinine clearance (mL/min) Dose
0 100 mg three times a week
10 100 mg alternate days
20 100 mg daily
40 150 mg daily
60 200 mg daily
>100 300 mg daily

In patients with normal renal function, the starting dose is 100 mg/day; this is gradually increased in 100-mg increments every 2–3 weeks until the optimal serum urate level (<300 µmol/L) or the maximum dose is reached. The maximum recommended daily dose in patients with normal renal function is 900 mg/day. A decrease in serum urate will occur within a couple of days of introducing allopurinol therapy with a peak effect at 7–10 days. The dissolution of tophi may take up to 6–12 months with effective therapy.

Approximately 3–5% of patients treated with allopurinol suffer from an adverse reaction. Intolerance usually manifests itself as a hypersensitivity reaction within the first 2 months of treatment. Adverse effects reported with allopurinol therapy include rash, fever, worsening renal failure, hepatotoxicity, vasculitis and even death. Severe toxic effects arise in less than 2% of patients. The risk of toxicity increases with renal impairment, age and concurrent drug therapy such as diuretics.

Prior to the availability of febuxostat, allopurinol desensitisation was attempted in patients with a mild hypersensitivity to allopurinol. This involved starting with a very low dose (50 μcg daily) and gradually increasing the dose over a period of several weeks to 100 mg daily. Desensitisation is now only considered where the reaction has been mild and there is an absence of alternative treatment options.

Azathioprine and mercaptopurine are metabolised by xanthine oxidase, co-administration of allopurinol reduces the metabolism of these two medicines leading to accumulation and toxicity. The dose of azathioprine or mercaptopurine should be reduced to approximately a quarter of the normal dose when co-prescribed with allopurinol. In addition, full blood counts should be performed at regular intervals to identify potential toxicity. High-dose allopurinol (>600 mg/day) increases carbamazepine blood levels by approximately one third; the same effect is not associated with lower doses of allopurinol (<300 mg/day).

Febuxostat

Febuxostat is a more selective and potent inhibitor of xanthine oxidase than allopurinol and has no effect on other enzymes involved in purine or pyrimidine metabolism (Lawrence Edwards, 2009). It is licensed for the treatment of chronic hyperuricaemia in conditions where urate deposition has already occurred including a history, or presence of, tophus and/or gouty arthritis. It is recommended as a second-line agent in patients who are intolerant of allopurinol or for whom allopurinol is contraindicated.

Febuxostat is more effective than fixed-dose allopurinol 300 mg in lowering uric acid concentrations in trials of up to 40 months’ duration (Schumacher et al., 2008, 2009). However, a reduction in the incidence of episodes of acute gout has not been demonstrated.

The recommended starting dose for febuxostat is 80 mg once daily. If the serum uric acid is greater than 357 µmol/L, after 2–4 weeks, the dose should be increased to 120 mg once daily. The increased potency and good oral bioavailability of febuxostat leads to rapid decreases in serum uric acid levels permitting the testing of levels 2 weeks after starting therapy or adjusting the dose. No dosage adjustment is necessary in patients with mild or moderate renal impairment; however, there are no current recommendations for use in patients with severe renal impairment, for example creatinine clearance <30 mL/min. In patients with mild hepatic impairment, the dose should not exceed 80 mg daily; the use of febuxostat has not been studied in patients with severe hepatic impairment. Febuxostat should not be given to patients with ischaemic heart disease or congestive heart failure because of cardiovascular side effects. When initiating therapy with febuxostat, gout flare prophylaxis should be prescribed for at least 6 months.

The most common adverse effects include respiratory infection, diarrhoea, headache and liver function abnormalities. It is recommended liver function should be tested in all patients prior to the initiation of therapy and periodically thereafter based on clinical judgement. The use of febuxostat is not recommended in patients concomitantly treated with mercaptopurine or azathioprine and in patients taking theophylline, serum levels of theophylline should be monitored.

Uricosuric agents

Uricosuric agents increase uric acid excretion primarily by inhibiting post-secretory tubular absorption of uric acid from filtered urate in the kidney. They are indicated as second-line agents in those who are urate under-excreters and are dependent on the patient having an adequate level of renal function. These agents should be avoided in patients with urate nephropathy or those who are over producers of uric acid due to the high risk of developing renal stones. Patients receiving a uricosuric agent are required to maintain an adequate fluid intake, and the need for alkalinisation of urine should be considered to prevent urate precipitation

Benzbromarone

Benzbromarone has been shown to be effective in lowering serum urate levels and reducing the time to resolution of tophi (Kumar et al., 2005; Reinders et al. 2009). However, its use was associated with hepatoxicity and it was withdrawn from the UK. It is still possible to obtain benzbromarone on a named patient basis. The risk of hepatotoxicity has been estimated to be 1:17,000 patients. For those who are prescribed benzbromarone, regular liver function tests must be performed during the first 6 months of therapy, and the hepatotoxic risk associated with the medicine should be clearly explained to the patient at the outset.

The dose ranges from 50 to 200 mg daily. It remains active in mild to moderate renal impairment and is indicated where there is a contraindication to other agents used in the management of gout such as allopurinol and febuxostat (see Fig. 54.4). Diarrhoea may be troublesome in approximately 10% of patients.

Uricolytics

Uricolytic drugs convert uric acid to allantoin through the actions of the enzyme urate oxidase (uricase). Allantoin is more soluble than uric acid and readily excreted by the kidney. Uricolytics are indicated for hyperuricaemia associated with tumour lysis syndrome and are not indicated for other forms of hyperuricaemia.

Patient care

It is important to inform patients about the disease, its curable nature, the aims of drug therapy and how to prevent and handle flares. The need for dietary and lifestyle changes should also be stressed. The UK Gout Society website can assist in providing patients with information about the condition and how it should be managed (http://www.ukgoutsociety.org/). In over-weight patients, gradual weight loss should be encouraged, very rapid weight loss should be avoided as it can cause ketosis and result in raised uric acid levels with the likelihood of precipitating an attack. Low purine diets are difficult to adhere to; a calorie-restricted diet with low carbohydrate (40% of energy), high protein (30% of energy) and unsaturated fat (30% of energy) should be recommended. The importance of avoiding or reducing alcohol consumption should also be emphasised.

Patients at risk of recurrent attacks should be issued with a suitable NSAID to treat the attack as soon as possible. The patient should be clear on what dose to take, when to initiate therapy, how long to take the medication for and any possible side effects to look out for. The patient should also be advised to avoid certain over-the-counter medicines which may exacerbate an attack, for example the use of aspirin as an analgesic.

Those taking long-term prophylactic therapy need to understand the importance of continuing therapy despite being asymptomatic. They should avoid running out of medication, as a short gap in therapy may precipitate an attack. Patients receiving uricosuric agents should be advised to maintain a fluid intake of at least 2 L/day to reduce the risk of uric acid stone formation in the kidneys.

Case studies

Answers

1. Initial therapy should be directed at promptly and safely resolving the pain. Drugs used in the management of an acute attack include NSAIDs, colchicine and corticosteroids. NSAIDs are indicated as first-line agents, but there are a number of patients who cannot take these medicines, and this includes those with renal impairment, heart failure or a history of gastric ulceration. Caution should also be exercised in elderly patients with multiple pathologies as they are prone to develop side effects with NSAIDs, particularly gastric symptoms. Colchicine has a slower-onset action then NSAIDs (6 h vs. 2 h) and is usually indicated where NSAIDs are contraindicated. When only a single joint is affected, an intra-articular injection directly into the joint may be considered; however, this is often too painful for the patient to bear.

As the patient has no contraindications, it would be appropriate to start an NSAID at maximal dose for 2–3 days and then reduce and continue for a further 7–10 days. There is no evidence to promote the use of one NSAID over another in the management of an acute attack; the main issue is to start therapy as soon as possible at maximal dose provided there are no contraindications. When initiating an NSAID, the need for gastric protection should be considered particularly in those aged over 65 years, previous history of peptic ulcer disease or gastro-intestinal complications and other medicines associated with gastro-intestinal side effects.

COX-2 inhibitors such as etoricoxib selectively block the COX-2 pathway resulting in reduced gastro-intestinal side effects. These agents are recommended for patients with high risk of gastro-intestinal side effects, but they are not recommended for routine use. Etoricoxib has been shown to be as equally effective as indometacin with fewer adverse effects. However, a systematic review and meta-analysis of etoricoxib showed an increased risk of cardiovascular and thromboembolic events associated with its use. It is recommended that COX-2 inhibitors be avoided in patients with established heart disease, cerebrovascular disease or peripheral vascular disease.

Where the patient’s pain is not adequately controlled by an NSAID, simple and low-potency opiate analgesia can be added to the regimen. The affected joint should be rested for 1–2 days and the affected area treated with ice.

2. Hyperuricaemia (raised serum uric acid levels) is one of the main risk factors for the development of gout; however, not all patients with a raised serum uric acid level will go on to develop gout. Studies have shown obesity, weight gain and hypertension all to be independent risk factors for the development of gout. Mr TH is slightly over-weight and has a history of hypertension. Measurement of his serum lipid levels should be considered as dyslipidaemia is commonly associated with gout.

Loop and thiazide diuretics are one of the most common modifiable risk factors associated with gout. It is thought they exert their action via volume depletion and the reduced tubular renal secretion of uric acid. In patients with heart failure, diuretics are often essential and cannot be discontinued. Mr TH’s bendroflumethiazide is being used for the management of hypertension and a change to an alternate hypertensive agent should be considered. Losartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker, has been shown to have both anti-hypertensive and urate-lowering properties and is suggested as a suitable agent in hypertensive patients with gout.

Alcohol consumption is an important risk factor for the development of gout. The mechanism of action is thought to be due to the metabolism of ethanol to acetyl coenzyme A leading to adenine nucleotide degradation and a subsequent rise in the levels of adenosine monophosphate which is a precursor of uric acid. Beer drinking is associated with the highest risk due to its high purine content. It is recommended that males restrict their alcohol consumption to less than 21 units/week and that both male and female patients have at least 3 alcohol-free days per week. Beer, stout, port and fortified wines should be avoided. Two 125-mL glasses of wine per day are considered acceptable and two pub-sized measures of spirits are considered safer than half a pint of many beers.

4. Lifestyle modification can be effective in preventing further attacks. Moderate physical exercise can be beneficial; however, intense muscular exercise should be avoided as it can lead to a rise in uric acid levels. In over-weight patients, gradual weight loss should be encouraged. Rapid weight loss can precipitate ketosis and a subsequent rise in the urate pool. Mr TH should be given appropriate dietary advice. It is the regular consumption of foods containing purines rather than the absolute purine content of a particular food that is important. The UK Gout Society (http://www.ukgoutsociety.org/) provides a fact sheet with dietary recommendations and the purine content of various foods for patients. Ideally, total daily purine intake should not exceed 200 mg/day, and foods such as shellfish, offal and sardines should be avoided. Dairy products have been shown to be beneficial in lowering serum uric acid, and even the addition of yoghurt on alternate days has been shown to reduce levels. The consumption of soft drinks sweetened with fructose or sucrose (not diet drinks) should be limited. Cherries whether sweet, tart, juice or fruit have a urate-lowering potential.

As previously discussed, Mr TH should also moderate his alcohol consumption.

Answers

2. Allopurinol is the first-line choice for prophylactic treatment of hyperuricaemia. Patients with normal renal function should be commenced on 100 mg daily and the dose gradually increased by 100 mg increments at 2–3 week intervals until the serum urate level has been reduced to less than 300 μmol/L. Serum urate levels may be artificially low during an acute attack. The level should be checked following the acute episode and prophylactic therapy, if deemed appropriate, should not be commenced until after the flare has resolved. Serum urate levels should fall within 2 days and peak at 7–10 days with the introduction of allopurinol and with dose increases.

Renal function should be checked prior to starting allopurinol to ensure that the correct dosage is prescribed based on the patient’s creatinine clearance. Reduced renal function increases the half-life of allopurinol’s active metabolite, oxypurinol. If the dose is not reduced according to renal function, the patient is at risk of oxypurinol accumulation and toxicity.

Mr SB does not take regular medication, but current medication should always be checked for interactions with allopurinol, for example azathioprine, mercaptopurine, carbamazepine.

As prophylactic treatment is being initiated, Mr SB is at risk of a mobilisation flare for approximately 12 months. Prophylaxis treatment for mobilisation flares should be recommended. First-line choice for the prevention of mobilisation flares is colchicine (500 μcg twice daily for 6 months). For patients who are intolerant to colchicines, NSAIDs offer a second-line choice, provided there are no contraindications to NSAID therapy. NSAIDs should be continued for a maximum of 6 weeks.

Answers

1. Severe toxic effects caused by allopurinol occur in less than 2% of patients taking allopurinol; however, the mortality risk is high in this group. The risk of allopurinol toxicity is increased for patients with renal impairment, old age and concomitant drugs. Mrs DM has all of these risk factors. Her renal function may have been impaired prior to admission due to her age, but this may have been further exacerbated by a period of dehydration caused from extended stasis following a fall. Bendroflumethiazide may have contributed to her fall, dehydration and history of gout. Her blood pressure requires close monitoring to ensure she is not suffering from postural hypotension or that the combination of two anti-hypertensive drugs is not causing her blood pressure to drop too low. Ideally, bendroflumethiazide should be avoided in this patient and if needed an alternate anti-hypertensive prescribed. Mrs DM’s starting dose of allopurinol is considerably higher than that which would normally be recommended, the high dose in combination with renal impairment may have caused an accumulation of the active metabolite of allopurinol, oxypurinol, which would have increased the risk of toxicity. Renal function should be checked in all patients prior to commencing allopurinol. For normal renal function, a starting dose of 100 mg once a day is recommended. For abnormal renal function, the product data sheet should be consulted for appropriate dose reduction. Hypersensitivity reactions usually occur up to 2 months following the initiation of allopurinol. Allopurinol should be stopped immediately in patients with symptoms of hypersensitivity reaction.
2. The choice of second-line prophylaxis treatment to replace allopurinol should be based on both renal function and pathophysiology of the disease.

Febuxostat is recommended in mild to moderate renal impairment, but there are no data in severe renal impairment. In patients with mild hepatic impairment, the dose of febuxostat must not exceed 80 mg once a day. Febuxostat is initiated at 80 mg daily but can be increased to 120 mg daily if the serum urate has not decreased adequately after 2–4 weeks of therapy. Febuxostat should not be used in patients with a history of cardiovascular disease.

In normal renal function, sulphinpyrazone or probenecid is indicated in urate under excretors when febuxostat is not appropriate. However, sulphinpyrazone can increase sodium and water retention and may worsen Mrs DM’s heart failure. Probenecid is less effective than other uricosuric agents and is generally not used.

Benzbromarone is effective in moderate renal impairment and may be considered if febuxostat is contraindicated or ineffective. Baseline liver function tests must be performed as well as regular monitoring during the first 6 months of therapy. Benzbromarone is only available on a named patient basis, patients must have failed or been intolerant of other therapies and understand that the use of benzbromarone is associated with liver toxicity.

Allopurinol desensitisation should only be considered when all other prophylactic treatments have failed and is not appropriate for patients who have suffered a severe hypersensitivity reaction.

References

Ahern M.J., Reid C., Gordon T.P., et al. Does colchicine work? The results of the first controlled study in acute gout. Aust. N. Z. J. Med.. 1987;17:301-304.

Aldington S., Shirtcliffe P., Weatherall M., et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk of major cardiovascular events with etoricoxib therapy. N. Z. Med. J.. 2005;118(1223):U1684.

Alloway J.A., Moriarty M.J., Hoogland Y.T., et al. Comparison of traimcinolone acetonide with indomethacin in the treatment of acute gouty arthritis. J. Rheumatol.. 1993;20:111-113.

Bahn A., Hagos Y., Reuter S., et al. Identification of a new urate and high affinity nicotinate transporter, hOAT10 (SLC22A13). J. Biol. Chem.. 2008;283:16332-16341.

Choi H.K., Curham G. Soft drinks, fructose consumption, and the risk of gout in men: prospective cohort study. Br. J. Med.. 2008;336:309-312.

Choi H.K., Atkinson K., Karlson E.W., et al. Purine rich foods, dairy and protein intake, and the risk of gout in men. N. Engl. J. Med.. 2004;350:1093-1103.

Choi H.K., Atkinson K., Karlson E.W., et al. Obesity, weight change, hypertension, diuretic use, and risk of gout in men: the health professionals follow-up study. Arch. Int. Med.. 2005;165:742-748.

Choi H.K., Ford E.S., Li C., et al. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in patients with gout: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arthritis Rheum.. 2007;57:109-115.

Dalbeth N., Haskard D.O. Mechanisms of inflammation in gout. Rheumatology. 2005;44:1090-1096.

Dalbeth N., Merriman T. Crystal ball gazing: new therapeutic targets for hyperuricaemia and gout. Rheumatology. 2009;48:222-226.

Doherty H. New insights into the epidemiology of gout. Rheumatology. 2009;49:613-614.

Lawrence Edwards N. Febuxostat: a new treatment for hyperuricaemia in gout. Rheumatology. 2009;48(Suppl. 2):ii15-ii19.

Graessler J., Graessler A., Unger S., et al. Association of the human urate transporter 1 with reduced renal uric acid excretion in a German Caucasian population. Arthritis Rheum.. 2006;54:292-300.

Huang H.Y., Appel L.J., Choi M.J., et al. The effects of vitamin C supplementation on serum concentrations of uric acid: results of a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum.. 2005;52:1843-1847.

Jordan K.M., Cameron S., Snaith M., on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology and British Health Professionals in Rheumatology Standards, Guidelines and Adult Working Group (SGAWG). British Society for Rheumatology and British Health Professionals in Rheumatology guideline for the management of gout. Rheumatology. 2007. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kem056b

Kumar S., Ng J., Gow P. Benzbromarone therapy in management of refractory gout. N. Z. Med. J.. 2005;118(1217):U1528.

Man C.Y., Cheung I., Cameron I., et al. Comparison of oral prednisolone/paracetamol and oral indomethacin/paracetamol combination therapy in the treatment of acute gout like arthritis: a double blind randomized, controlled trial. Ann. Emerg. Med.. 2007;49:670-677.

McGonagle D., Tan A.L., Shankaranarayana S., et al. Management of treatment resistant inflammation of acute or chronic tophaceous gout with anakinra. Ann. Rheum. Dis.. 2007;66:1683-1684.

Morris I., Varughese G., Mattingly P. Lesson of the week – colchicine in acute gout. Br. Med. J.. 2003;327:1275-1276.

Nuki G. Colchicine: its mechanism of action and efficacy in crystal-induced inflammation. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep.. 2008;10:218-227.

Reinders M.K., Haagsma C., Jansen T.L., et al. A randomised controlled trial on the efficacy and tolerability with dose escalation of allopurinol 300–600mg/day versus benzbromarone 100–200mg/day in patients with gout. Ann. Rheum. Dis.. 2009;68:892-897.

Richette P., Bardin T. Gout. Lancet. 2010;375:318-328.

Rider T.G., Jordan K.M. The modern management of gout. Rheumatology. 2010;49:5-14.

Schumacher H.R., Boice J.A., Daikh D.I., et al. Randomised double blind trial of etoricoxib and indometacin in treatment of acute gouty arthritis. Br. Med. J.. 2002;324:488-492.

Schumacher H.R., Becker M.A., Wortmann R.L., et al. Effects of febuxostat versus allopurinol and placebo in reducing serum urate in subjects with hyperuricaemia and gout: a 28-week, phase III, randomized, double blind, parallel-group trial. Arthritis Rheum.. 2008;59:1540-1548.

Schumacher H.R., Becker M.A., Lloyd E., et al. Febuxostat in the treatment of gout; 5-yr findings of the FOCUS efficacy and safety study. Rheumatology. 2009;48:188-194.

Sica A.D., Schoolwerth A.C. Part 1. Uric acid and losartan. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2002;11:475-482.

So A., De Smedt T., Revas S., et al. A pilot study of IL-1 inhibition by anakinra in acute gout. Arthritis Res. Ther.. 2007;9:R28.

Takahashi S., Moriwaki Y., Yamamoto T., et al. Effects of combination treatment using anti-hyperuriaemic agents with fenofibrate and/or losartan on uric acid metabolism. Arthritis Res. Ther.. 2003;72:671-674.

Taniguchi A., Urano W., Yamanaka M., et al. A common mutation in an organic anion transporter gene SLC22A12, is a suppressing factor for the development of gout. Arthritis Rheum.. 2005;52:2576-2577.

Terkeltaub R., Furst D.E., Bennett K., et al. Low dose (1.8 mg) vs high dose (4.8 mg) oral colchicine regimens in patients with acute gout flare in a large, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study. Arthritis Rheum.. 2008;58(Suppl. 9):1944.

Williamson P.J., Ene M.D., Roberts C.J. A study of the potential interactions between azapropazone and frusemide in man. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.. 1984;18:619-623.

Zhang W., Doherty M., Pascual E., et al. EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part I: diagnosis. Report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann. Rheum. Dis.. 2006;65:1301-1311. doi 10.1136/ard.2006.055251