General Approach to Trauma Patients

Published on 07/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Critical Care Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1499 times

Chapter 2 General Approach to Trauma Patients

4 What are the most important causes of hypotension in the trauma patient?

Hemorrhagic shock—bleeding—is the most common cause of hypotension in the trauma patient. A vigorous search for bleeding is the key to the initial evaluation of any trauma patient with hypotension. Even a single episode of hypotension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] < 100-110 mm Hg) should be considered a potential harbinger of serious injury requiring interventional hemorrhage control. Methods for rapid localization of hemorrhage are discussed in Question 5.

Obstructive shock is that caused by tension pneumothorax or pericardial tamponade. Pericardial tamponade is usually diagnosed with the help of ultrasound examination. Tension pneumothorax is usually diagnosed clinically by mechanism and physical examination. Occasionally ultrasound or chest radiographic examination may be of assistance, but one should never wait to obtain these studies when the diagnosis is suspected.

Spinal shock is a form of neurogenic shock that occurs because of the loss of sympathetic tone and peripheral vasodilation that occurs with high (typically T4 level or above) spinal cord injuries. It should be suspected when the patient has had a compatible mechanism of injury, the hypotension is accompanied by bradycardia, and results of the neurologic examination are consistent (lower extremity paralysis, loss of rectal tone, and a compatible sensory level).

Cardiogenic shock may result from traumatic cardiac contusion or occasionally from preexisting cardiac pathologic condition (coronary disease, valvular lesions, congestive heart failure) in patients with other, noncardiac trauma.

5 How can I rapidly identify the source of bleeding in hemorrhagic shock?

Delayed control of bleeding ranks with airway compromise as a major preventable cause of trauma death. To be controlled, the source of bleeding must be rapidly identified. Hypotension due to hemorrhage typically does not occur until a trauma patient has lost 30% to 40% of his or her blood volume. This quantity of blood can be lost only into a limited number of places. The most important of these places are, externally, the chest, the abdomen, the retroperitoneum, and occasionally the thighs. Patients with hypotension should not undergo prolonged imaging such as computed tomography (CT), and all these potential areas of bleeding must usually be evaluated in the emergency department in a matter of minutes. This is possible with reasonable sensitivity for major hemorrhage with use of a combination of physical examination, ultrasound scan, and plain radiography, all modalities that are widely and quickly available.

Physical examination is the most important tool for identifying external sources of bleeding. External bleeding is often missed or underappreciated when it is due to scalp wounds (which can result in significant blood loss); wounds in the back or axillae, which may be missed by a cursory examination; or mangled extremities, which may be diffusely oozing.

Physical examination and chest radiographic examination are the keys to identifying thoracic bleeding. Both can be done quickly. Ultrasound may be a useful adjunct (see extended focused abdominal sonography for trauma [E-FAST] later). If reasonable suspicion exists for intrathoracic bleeding, tube thoracostomy may be both diagnostic and therapeutic.

The abdomen is usually evaluated by FAST. If it cannot be performed, or is technically limited, diagnostic peritoneal aspiration or lavage is an alternative.

The retroperitoneum cannot be directly evaluated without CT, but most hemodynamically significant retroperitoneal bleeding is the result of pelvic fractures, which can be detected on a plain radiograph of the pelvis. Although retroperitoneal bleeding due to pelvic fractures generally correlates with the severity of the fracture, even relatively minor fractures may occasionally produce major hemorrhage. Similarly, femur fractures, especially if bilateral, suggest the possibility of significant hemorrhage into the thighs.

7 What is damage control resuscitation?

Damage control resuscitation refers to the practice of administering blood products early in the course of resuscitation of patients with massive hemorrhage (anticipated need for > 10 U packed red blood cell [PRBC] transfusion) to limit the coagulopathy associated with crystalloid administration or isolated PRBC transfusion. Observational data from the battlefield and civilian trauma centers suggest that early administration of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelets reduces mortality and postoperative transfusion after major hemorrhage. The optimal ratio of PRBC/FFP/platelets that should be administered in the setting of massive bleeding is a matter of debate, and no controlling evidence is available. The U.S. Army has adopted a policy of administering these products in a 1:1:1 ratio for battlefield casualties requiring massive transfusion. Other investigators have achieved reductions in mortality by instituting a 4:2:1 ratio in place of unstructured transfusion. Whatever the exact ratio chosen, it is ideal to have in place a massive transfusion protocol that allows the blood bank to deliver blood products rapidly in a fixed ratio. This allows the desired ratio to be achieved and simplifies the process of care when caring for these critically ill patients. Massive transfusion protocols using the different product ratios described earlier have been shown to reduce mortality in case-controlled studies. Whenever this quantity of transfusion is required, the use of a combination rapid transfuser–fluid warmer is highly recommended to prevent hypothermia. It should be reemphasized that these guidelines apply only to the massively transfused patient and that excessive blood products in patients with minimal hemorrhage may even be harmful.

16 When is chemical deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis safe in traumatically injured patients?

Trauma patients in general are at high risk for the development of venous thrombosis and thromboembolism, and so prompt initiation of prophylaxis against DVT is important. The American College of Chest Physicians recommends immediate initiation of thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin in all trauma patients except those with a contraindication because of active bleeding or a high risk of clinically important bleeding. What exactly comprises a contraindication in trauma remains subjective. Retrospective data suggest that chemical prophylaxis is safe in patients whose condition is stable, even with closed-head and solid-organ injuries, and that chemical DVT prophylaxis can be safely initiated 24 to 72 hours after injury in these patients. Large randomized trials are still needed to better define the best thromboprophylaxis regimen and the optimal timing for initiation of thromboprophylaxis in patients with major trauma.

Bibliography

1 Alam H.B. Advances in resuscitation strategies. Int J Surg. 2011;9:5–12.

2 American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. Advanced Trauma Life Support Course Manual, 8th ed. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2008.

3 An G., West M.A. Abdominal compartment syndrome: a concise clinical review. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:1304–1310.

4 Bickell W.H., Wall M.J.Jr. Pepe PE, et al: Immediate versus delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1105–1109.

5 Bracken M.B., Shepard M.J., Holford T.R., et al. Administration of methylprednisolone for 24 or 48 hours or tirilazad mesylate for 48 hours in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Results of the Third National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Randomized Controlled Trial. National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. JAMA. 1997;277:1597–1604.

6 Brain Trauma Foundation. American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons: Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(1 Suppl):S1–106.

7 Burlew C.C., Moore E.E., Smith W.R., et al. Preperitoneal pelvic packing/external fixation with secondary angioembolization: optimal care for life-threatening hemorrhage from unstable pelvic fractures. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:628–635. discussion 635-637

8 Cooper D.J., Rosenfeld J.V., Murray L., et alDECRA Trial Investigators. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group: Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1493–1502.

9 Geerts W.H., Bergqvist D., Pineo G.F., et alAmerican College of Chest Physicians. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th ed). Chest. 2008;133(6 Suppl):381S–453S.

10 Gruen R.L., Jurkovich G.J., McIntyre L.K., et al. Patterns of errors contributing to trauma mortality: lessons learned from 2,594 deaths. Ann Surg. 2006;244:371–380.

11 Langeron O., Birenbaum A., Amour J. Airway management in trauma. Minerva Anestesiol. 2009;75:307–331.

12 Lee J.C., Peitzman A.B. Damage-control laparotomy. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006;12:346–350.

13 Patel N.Y., Riherd J.M. Focused assessment with sonography for trauma: methods, accuracy, and indications. Surg Clin North Am. 2011;91:195–207.

14 Sanddal T.L., Esposito T.J., Whitney J.R., et al. Analysis of preventable trauma deaths and opportunities for trauma care improvement in Utah. J Trauma. 2011;70:970–977.

15 Schoenfeld A.J., Bono C.M., McGuire K.J., et al. Computed tomography alone versus computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the identification of occult injuries to the cervical spine: a meta-analysis. J Trauma. 2010;68:109–113.

16 Seamon M.J., Feather C., Smith B.P., et al. Just one drop: the significance of a single hypotensive blood pressure reading during trauma resuscitations. J Trauma. 2010;68:1289–1294.