Gastrointestinal Tract Infections

Published on 08/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Basic Science

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2609 times

Gastrointestinal Tract Infections

Objectives

1. Describe the general anatomy of the gastrointestinal tract and the relationship to transmission of infectious disease.

2. Differentiate normal flora from pathogenic organisms, and describe the relative numbers of organisms distributed throughout the gastrointestinal tract.

3. Identify nonbacterial agents of infection of the gastrointestinal tract, and name their associated diseases.

4. Describe the innate immunity as it relates to the gastrointestinal tract, including physical, chemical, and bacterial components.

5. Differentiate infections of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract based on clinical manifestations including watery diarrhea and bloody diarrhea (dysentery).

6. Identify the major cause for antimicrobial therapy–associated diarrhea and the proper laboratory diagnostic procedure for identification, including the toxin assay.

7. Identify the most common causes for watery diarrhea, dysentery, pseudomembranous colitis, and infant botulism.

8. Describe the bacterial pathogenic mechanisms associated with gastrointestinal disease, including the presence and function of enterotoxins, attachment, and invasion mechanisms.

9. Determine the adequacy of a specimen based on collection, transport, and specimen type for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal infections.

10. Define the following media, including the organisms identified and the chemical properties associated with the selection and differentiation within the media (MAC, SMAC, EMB, HEK, XLD, SS, and Campy).

11. List the organisms and microbial products that can be detected by non-culture methods.

12. Correlate patient signs and symptoms with laboratory results for the identification of the gastrointestinal pathogen.

Anatomy

We are all connected to the external environment through our gastrointestinal (GI) tract (Figure 75-1). What we swallow enters the GI tract and passes through the esophagus into the stomach, through the small and large intestines, and finally to the anus. During passage, fluids and other components are added to this material as secretory products of individual cells and as enzymatic secretions of glands and organs, and they are removed from this material by absorption through the gut epithelium.

The major components of the tract are listed in Box 75-1. The nature of the epithelial cells lining the GI tract varies with each portion. The lining of the GI tract is called the mucosa. Because of the differing nature of the mucosal surfaces of various segments of the bowel, specific infectious disease processes tend to occur in each segment.

The wall of the small intestine has folds that have millions of tiny, hairlike projections called villi. Each villus contains an arteriole, venule, and lymph vessel (Figure 75-2). The function of villi is to absorb fluids and nutrients from the intestinal contents. Epithelial cells lining the surface of villi have a surface resembling a fine brush, referred to as a brush border. The brush border is formed by nearly 2000 microvilli per epithelial cell. Intestinal digestive enzymes are produced in brush border cells toward the top of the villi. Villi and microvilli help make the small intestine the primary site of digestion and absorption by significantly increasing the surface area; more than 90% of physiologic net fluid absorption occurs here. Mucus-secreting goblet cells are found in large numbers of villi and intestinal crypts.

Similar to the small intestine, the large intestine is composed of several segments (see Box 75-1). The wall of the large intestine consists of columnar epithelial cells, many of which are mucus-producing goblet cells. In contrast to the small intestine, there are no villous projections into the lumen. The remaining excess fluid within the GI tract is resorbed through the cells lining the large intestine before waste is finally discharged through the rectum.

In addition to the previously discussed components of the GI tract, numerous other organs and structures are either located in the main digestive organs or open into them. These accessory organs and structures include the salivary glands, tongue, teeth, liver, gallbladder, and pancreas. Except for the teeth and salivary glands, these organs are illustrated in Figure 75-1.

Resident Microbial Flora

The GI tract contains vast, diverse normal flora. Although the acidity of the stomach prevents any significant colonization in a normal host under most circumstances, many species can survive passage through the stomach to become resident within the lower intestinal tract. Normally, the upper small intestine contains only sparse flora (bacteria, primarily streptococci; lactobacilli; and yeasts; 101 to 103/mL), but in the distal ileum, counts are about 106 to 107/mL, with Enterobacteriaceae and Bacteroides spp. predominantly present.

Infants usually are colonized by normal human epithelial flora, such as staphylococci, Corynebacterium spp., and other gram-positive organisms (bifidobacteria, clostridia, lactobacilli, streptococci), within a few hours of birth. Over time, the content of the intestinal flora changes. The normal flora of the adult large bowel (colon) is established relatively early in life and consists predominantly of anaerobic species, including Bacteroides, Clostridium, Peptostreptococcus, Bifidobacterium, and Eubacterium.

Aerobes, including Escherichia coli, other Enterobacteriaceae, enterococci, and streptococci, are outnumbered by anaerobes 1000 : 1. The number of bacteria per gram of stool within the bowel lumen increases steadily as material approaches the sigmoid colon (the last segment). Eighty percent of the dry weight of feces from a healthy human consists of bacteria, which can be present in numbers as high as 1011 to 1012 colony-forming units (CFU)/g of stool.

Gastroenteritis

Worldwide, diarrheal diseases are the second leading cause of death; about 48 million enteric infections occur each year. These infections cause significant morbidity and death, particularly in elderly people and children younger than 5 years of age. It has been estimated that 4 million to 6 million children die each year of diarrheal diseases, particularly in developing countries in Asia and Africa. Even in developed countries, significant morbidity occurs as a result of diarrheal illness. Although acute diarrheal syndromes are usually self-limited, some patients with infectious diarrhea require diagnostic studies and treatment.

Pathogenesis

Similar to the pathogenesis of urinary tract infections, the host and the invading microorganism possess key features that determine whether an enteric pathogen is able to cause microbial diarrhea.

Host Factors

The human host has numerous defenses that normally prevent or control disease produced by enteric pathogens. For example, the acidity of the stomach effectively restricts the number and types of organisms that enter the lower GI tract. Normal peristalsis helps move organisms toward the rectum, interfering with their ability to adhere to the mucosa. The mucous layer coating the epithelium entraps microorganisms and helps propel them through the gut. The normal flora prevents colonization by potential pathogens.

Mucous membranes line the GI tract, as well as the respiratory and urogenital tracts. These membranes are exposed to the external environment in the form of food, water, and air. These membranes contain multiple cell types; some are secreting or absorbing cells that perform physiologic functions of the membrane, while others serve as protective barriers. For example, sets of specialized cells called follicles are part of the mucous membrane lining the GI tract and serve a protective function. Collections of follicles are called Peyer’s patches. Follicles contain M cells, macrophages, and B and T cells. As a result of the collective action of the follicle components following uptake and processing of the bacteria or antigens, secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) is released. Phagocytic cells and sIgA within the gut help destroy etiologic agents of disease, as do eosinophils, which are particularly active against parasites. Follicles and Peyer’s patches are found in the small and large intestines.

Other factors that determine the progression and potential invasion by pathogenic organisms include the host’s personal hygiene and age. An initial step in the pathogenesis of enteric infections is ingestion of the pathogen. The majority of enteric pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, and parasites, are transmitted by the fecal-oral route. Enteric infections can be spread by contamination of food products or drinking water and then subsequent ingestion. The age of the host also plays a role in whether disease is established. For example, diarrheal infections caused by rotavirus or enteropathogenic Escherichia coli tend to affect young children.

Finally, the normal intestinal flora is an important factor in the host protection from the introduction of a potentially harmful microorganism. Whenever a reduction in normal flora occurs as a result of antibiotic treatment or some host factor, resistance to GI infection is significantly reduced. The most common example of the protective effect of normal flora is the development of the syndrome pseudomembranous colitis (PMC). This inflammatory disease of the large bowel is caused by the toxins of the anaerobic organism Clostridium difficile and occasionally other clostridia and perhaps even Staphylococcus aureus. The inflammatory disease seldom occurs except following antimicrobial or antimetabolite treatment that has altered the normal flora. Almost every antimicrobial agent and several cancer agents have been associated with the development of PMC. C. difficile, usually acquired from the hospital environment, is suppressed by normal flora. When normal flora is reduced, C. difficile is able to multiply and produce its toxins. This syndrome is also known as antibiotic-associated colitis. Other microorganisms that may gain a foothold when released from selective pressure of normal flora include Candida spp., staphylococci, Pseudomonas spp., and various Enterobacteriaceae.

Microbial Factors

The ability of an organism to cause GI infection depends not only on the susceptibility of the human host to the invading organism but also on the organism’s virulence traits. To cause GI infection, a microorganism must possess one or more factors that allow it to overcome host defenses or it must enter the host at a time when one or more of the innate defense systems are inactive. For example, certain stool pathogens are able to survive gastric acidity only if the acidity has been reduced by bicarbonate, other buffers, or by medications for ulcers (e.g., cimetidine, ranitidine, H2 blockers). Pathogens ingested with milk have a better chance of survival, because milk neutralizes stomach acidity. Organisms such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Shigella, E. coli O157:H7, and C. difficile (a spore-forming Clostridium spp.) are able to withstand exposure to gastric acids and thus require much smaller infectious doses than do acid-sensitive organisms such as Salmonella.

Primary Pathogenic Mechanisms.

Because the normal adult GI tract receives up to 8 L of ingested fluid daily, plus the secretions of the various glands that contribute to digestion (salivary glands, pancreas, gallbladder, stomach), of which all but a small amount must be resorbed, any disruption of the normal flow or reabsorption of fluid will profoundly affect the host. Depending on how they interact with the human host, enteric pathogens may cause disease in one or more of the following three ways:

Examples of microorganisms for each of these pathogenic mechanisms are listed in Table 75-1.

Cytotoxin

Neurotoxin

Attachment Within or Close to Mucosal Cells/Adherence

Invasion

image

Toxins

Enterotoxins.

Enterotoxins alter the metabolic activity of intestinal epithelial cells, resulting in an outpouring of electrolytes and fluid into the lumen. They act primarily in the jejunum and upper ileum, where most fluid transport takes place. The stool of patients with enterotoxic diarrheal disease involving the small bowel is profuse and watery, and blood or polymorphonuclear neutrophils are not prominent features.

The classic example of an enterotoxin is that of Vibrio cholerae (Figure 75-3). This toxin consists of two subunits, A and B. The A subunit is composed of one molecule of A1, the toxic moiety, and one molecule of A2, which binds an A1 subunit to five B subunits. The B subunits bind the toxin to a receptor (a ganglioside, an acidic glycolipid) on the intestinal cell membrane. Once bound, the toxin acts on adenylate cyclase enzyme, which catalyzes the transformation of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). Increased levels of cAMP stimulate the cell to actively secrete ions into the intestinal lumen. To maintain osmotic stabilization, the cells then secrete fluid into the lumen. The fluid is drawn from the intravascular fluid store of the body. Patients therefore can become dehydrated and hypotensive rapidly. V. cholerae inhabits sea and stagnant water and is spread in contaminated water. The organisms have been isolated from coastal waters of several states, and sporadic cases of cholera occur in the United States. Additional information about V. cholerae is provided in Chapter 26.

Other organisms also produce a cholera-like enterotoxin. A group of vibrios similar to V. cholerae but serologically different, known as the noncholera vibrios, produce disease clinically identical to cholera, effected by a very similar toxin. The heat-labile toxin (LT) elaborated by certain strains of E. coli, called enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), is similar to cholera toxin, sharing cross-reactive antigenic determinants. The enterotoxins of some Salmonella spp. (including S. enterica subsp. arizonae), Vibrio parahaemolyticus, the Campylobacter jejuni group, Clostridium perfringens, Clostridium difficile, Bacillus cereus, Aeromonas, Shigella dysenteriae, and many other Enterobacteriaceae also cause positive reactions in at least one of the tests for enterotoxin (discussed later). The exact contribution of these enterotoxins to the pathogenicity of most stool pathogens remains to be elucidated.

Certain strains of E. coli, in addition to producing a heat-labile toxin (LT) similar to cholera toxin, also produce a heat-stable toxin (ST) with other properties. Although ST also promotes fluid secretion into the intestinal lumen, its effect is mediated by activation of guanylate cyclase, resulting in increased levels of cyclic guanylate monophosphate (GMP), which yields the same net effect as increased cAMP. Tests for ST include enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunodiffusion and cell culture. Molecular techniques, including the use of DNA probes as well as several amplification assays, have been used to identify ETEC directly in clinical samples or isolated bacterial colonies.

Several tests are available for the detection of enterotoxin. Immunodiffusion, ELISA, and latex agglutination tests are all available to identify specific toxins. Molecular probes and amplification assays for toxin detection are also available, primarily for research use.

Cytotoxins.

Cytotoxins, which constitute the second category of toxins, disrupt the structure of individual intestinal epithelial cells. When destroyed, these cells slough from the surface of the mucosa, leaving it raw and unprotected. The secretory or absorptive functions of the cells are no longer performed. The damaged tissue evokes a strong inflammatory response from the host, further inflicting tissue damage. Numerous polymorphonuclear neutrophils and blood are often seen in the stool, and pain, cramps, and tenesmus (painful straining during a bowel movement) are common symptoms. The term dysentery refers to this destructive disease of the mucosa, almost exclusively occurring in the colon. Cytotoxin has not yet been shown to be the sole virulence factor for any etiologic agent of GI disease, because most agents produce a cytotoxin in conjunction with other factors.

E. coli strains seem to possess virulence mechanisms of many types. Some strains produce a cytotoxin capable of destroying epithelial cells and blood cells. Certain strains produce a cytotoxin that affects Vero cells (African green monkey kidney cells) and resemble the cytotoxin produced by Shigella dysenteriae (Shiga toxin); such strains of E. coli are associated with hemorrhagic colitis and the sequelae following infection of hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) and thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura (TTP). These strains of E. coli are referred to as enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), also referred to as serotoxigenic or STET/VTEC. See Chapter 20 for more information related to toxigenic E. coli. Table 75-2 summarizes the key pathogenic features of the primary groups of diarrheogenic E. coli.

TABLE 75-2

Overview of the Primary Groups of E. coli That Cause Diarrhea in Humans

Type Primary Mode of Pathogenesis Other Comments
Enterotoxigenic (ETEC) Produces heat-labile (LT) or heat stable (ST) enterotoxins; genes of both toxins reside on a plasmid; LTs are closely related in structure and function to cholera toxin; STs result in net intestinal fluid secretion by stimulating guanylate cyclase Common cause of traveler’s diarrhea; infects all ages
Enteroaggregative (EAEC) Binds to small intestine cells via fimbriae encoded by a large molecular weight plasmid, forming small clumps of bacteria on the cell surface; other plasmid-borne virulence factors include structured pilin, a heat-stable enterotoxin, novel anti-aggregative protein, and a heat-labile enterotoxin, all believed to be the cause of the associated diarrhea Infects primarily young children
Enteroinvasive (EIEC) Pathogenesis has yet to be totally elucidated; studies suggest that mechanisms by which diarrhea results are virtually identical to those of Shigella spp. Very difficult to distinguish from Shigella spp. and other E. coli strains
Enteropathogenic (EPEC) Initially attaches in the colon and small intestine and then becomes intimately adhered to intestinal epithelial cells, subsequently causing the loss of enterocyte microvilli (effacement); genes for attachment/effacement reside in a cluster on the bacterial chromosome (i.e., pathogenicity island) Diarrhea in infants, particularly in large urban hospitals
Enterohemorrhagic (EHEC) OR Attaches to and effaces gut epithelial cells in a similar manner as EPEC; in addition, EHEC elaborates shiga toxins Although many outbreaks are caused by E. coli O157:H7, other serotypes have been implicated in outbreaks and sporadic cases
Gene recombination among strains makes classification difficult
Enterohemorrhagic (EHEC); or serotoxigenic (STEC); verotoxigenic (VTEC) (newest, terminology) Produce one or more shiga toxins referred to as verocytotoxins. Attaches to and effaces gut epithelial cells in a similar manner as EPEC 0157 STEC serotypes; contains most common serotypes 0157 : H7 and nonmotile 0157 : NM. There are more than 150 non-0157 serotypes that have been isolated from patients with diarrhea or hemolytic uremic syndrome

C. difficile produces a cytotoxin, the presence of which is a most useful marker for diagnosis of PMC. S. dysenteriae, Staphylococcus aureus, C. perfringens, and V. parahaemolyticus produce cytotoxins that contribute to the pathogenesis of diarrhea, although they may not be essential for initiation of disease. Other vibrios, Aeromonas hydrophila (a relatively newly described agent of GI disease), and Campylobacter jejuni, the most common cause of GI disease in many areas of the United States, have been shown to produce cytotoxins. The role that these toxins play in the pathogenesis of the disease syndromes is not yet completely delineated.

Neurotoxins.

Food poisoning, or intoxication, may occur as a result of ingesting toxins produced by microorganisms. The microorganisms usually produce their toxins in foodstuffs before they are ingested; thus, the patient ingests preformed toxin. Strictly speaking, these syndromes are not GI infections but rather intoxications; because they are acquired by ingestion of microorganisms or their products, they are considered in this chapter. Particularly in staphylococcal food poisoning and botulism, the causative organisms may not be present in the patient’s bowel.

Bacterial agents of food poisoning that produce neurotoxins include Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus. Toxins produced by these organisms cause vomiting, independent of other actions on the gut mucosa. Staphylococcal food poisoning is one of the most frequently reported categories of food-borne disease. The organisms grow in warm food, primarily meat or dairy products, and produce the toxin. Onset of disease is usually within 2 to 6 hours of ingestion. B. cereus produces two toxins, one of which is preformed, called the emetic toxin, because it produces vomiting. The second type, probably involving several enterotoxins, causes diarrhea. Often acquired from eating rice, B. cereus has also been associated with cooked meat, poultry, vegetables, and desserts.

Perhaps the most common cause of food poisoning is from type A Clostridium perfringens, which produces toxin in the host after ingestion. As a result, a relatively mild, self-limited (usually 24-hour) gastroenteritis occurs, often in outbreaks in hospitals. Meats and gravies are typical foods associated with this type of food poisoning.

One of the most potent neurotoxins is produced by the anaerobic organism Clostridium botulinum. This toxin prevents the release of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine at the cholinergic nerve junctions, causing flaccid paralysis. The toxin acts primarily on the peripheral nerves but also on the autonomic nervous system. Patients exhibit descending symmetric paralysis and ultimately die of respiratory paralysis unless they are mechanically ventilated. In most cases, adult patients who develop botulism have ingested the preformed toxin in food (home-canned tomato products and canned, cream-based foods are often implicated), and the disease is considered intoxication, although C. botulinum has been recovered from the stools of many adult patients. A relatively recently recognized syndrome, infant botulism, is a true GI infection. In adults, the normal flora probably prevents colonization by C. botulinum, whereas the organism is able to multiply and produce toxin in the infant bowel. Infant botulism is not an infrequent condition; babies acquire the organism by ingestion, although the source of the bacterium is not always clear. Because an association has been found with honey and corn syrup, infants younger than 9 months of age should not be fed honey. The effect of the toxin is the same, whether ingested in food or produced by growing organisms within the bowel.

Attachment.

An organism’s ability to cause disease can also depend on its ability to colonize and adhere to the bowel. To illustrate, ETEC must be able to adhere to and colonize the small intestine, as well as produce an enterotoxin. These organisms produce an adherence antigen, called colonization factor antigen (CFA). Certain strains of E. coli referred to as the enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) attach and then adhere to the intestinal brush border. This localized adherence is mediated by the production of pili. Subsequent to attaching, EPEC disrupts normal cell function by effacing the brush epithelium, thereby causing diarrheal disease. This complete process is referred to as attachment and effacement. Genes responsible for the initial adherence of ETEC, EHEC, and EPEC to intestinal epithelial cells reside on a transmissible plasmid. EHEC has the same ability to attach to intestinal epithelial cells and cause effacement. In addition, EHEC produces a Shiga toxin that spreads to the bloodstream, causing systemic damage to vascular endothelial cells of various organs, including kidney, colon, small intestine, and lung. EHEC is believed to have arisen as a result of an EPEC strain having become infected with a bacteriophage carrying the Shiga toxin gene (Figure 75-4).

Giardia lamblia, a parasite, has increasingly become more common as an etiologic agent of GI disease in the United States. Excreted into fresh water by natural animal hosts such as the beaver, the organism can be acquired by drinking stream water or even city water in some localities, particularly in the Rocky Mountain states. The organism, a flagellated protozoan, adheres to the intestinal mucosa of the small bowel, by means of a ventral sucker, destroying the mucosal cells’ ability to participate in normal secretion and absorption. No evidence indicates invasion or toxin production.

Cryptosporidia and Isospora spp., parasitic etiologic agents of diarrhea in animals and poultry and more recently recognized as causing human disease, probably also act by adhering to intestinal mucosa and disrupting function. Cryptosporidia are often seen in the diarrhea of patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), as well as in travelers’ diarrhea, day care epidemics, and diarrhea in people with animal exposure. Cryptosporidia and Isospora spp. may cause severe, protracted diarrhea in AIDS patients. Other coccidian parasites, such as microsporidia, produce diarrhea by destroying intestinal cell function.

Invasion.

Following initial and essential adherence to GI mucosal cells, some enteric pathogens are able to gain access to the intracellular environment. Invasion allows the organism to reach deeper tissues, access nutrients for growth, and possibly avoid the host immune system.

In the case of diarrhea caused by Shigella, the primary mechanism of disease production consists of (1) the triggering and directing by Shigella entry into colonic epithelial cells by genes located on a plasmid, and once internalized, (2) the rapid multiplication of Shigella in the submucosa and lamina propria and its intracellular and extracellular spread to other adjacent colonic epithelial cells. Once in the host cell cytoplasm, Shigella spp. cause apoptosis and release of the cytokines interleukin (IL)-1 and IL-8. The inflammatory response to these cytokines damages the colonic mucosa and exacerbates (aggravates) the infection. The genes for invasiveness are located on a large invasion plasmid. These activities lead to extensive superficial tissue destruction. If these two steps do not occur, one does not get the clinical presentation of classic dysentery (Table 75-3). The entry process is illustrated in Figure 75-5.

TABLE 75-3

Types of Enteric Infections

Pathogenic Mechanism Major Symptoms Examples of Etiologic Agents
Upsetting of fluid and electrolyte balance/noninflammatory

Invasion and possible cytotoxin production/ inflammatory (dysentery) Penetration with subsequent access to the bloodstream (enteric fever)

image

Salmonellae interact with the apical (top) microvilli of colonic epithelial cells, disrupting the brush border. Similar to Shigella, Salmonella spp. also stimulate the host cell to internalize through rearrangements of host actin filaments and other cytoskeleton proteins. Once the whole bacteria are internalized within endocytic vesicles of the host epithelial cell, organisms begin to multiply within the vacuoles. In contrast to Shigella spp. that use the colonic mucosal epithelium as a site of multiplication, certain serotypes of Salmonella, such as Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi and S. choleraesuis, use the colonic epithelium as a route to gain access to the submucosal layers, mesenteric lymph nodes, and subsequently the bloodstream. The entry of Salmonella is a complex process involving several essential genes, as well as particular environmental conditions of the host cell; this process is still being delineated. Many virulence factors for invasion of salmonellae into nonphagocytic cells as well as their ability to cause systemic infections by surviving in phagocytic cells and replicating within the Salmonella-containing vesicle in a variety of eukaryotic cells are determined by chromosomal genes, many of which are located within pathogenicity islands. Invasiveness is also thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of disease associated with species of vibrios, campylobacters, Yersinia enterocolitica, Plesiomonas shigelloides, and Edwardsiella tarda.

Certain parasites, particularly Entamoeba histolytica and Balantidium coli, invade the intestinal epithelium of the colon. The ensuing amebic dysentery is characterized by blood and numerous white blood cells, and the patient experiences cramping and tenesmus. Other parasites acquired by ingestion, such as Trichinella, may cause transient bloody diarrhea and pain during migration through the intestinal mucosa to their preferred sites within the host.

Other organisms selectively destroy absorptive cells (e.g., villus tip cells) in the mucosa, disrupting their normal cell function and thereby causing diarrhea. Rotaviruses and Norwalk-like viruses are both visualized by electron microscopy within the absorptive cells at the ends of the intestinal villi, where they multiply and destroy cellular function. As a result, the villi become shortened, and inflammatory cells infiltrate the mucosa, further contributing to the pathologic condition. In addition to these viral agents, hepatitis A, B, and C and occasionally enteric adenoviruses have been associated with diarrheal symptoms in patients.

Clinical Manifestations

The clinical symptoms experienced by a patient are largely dependent on how the enteric pathogen causes disease. To illustrate, patients infected with an enteric pathogen that upsets fluid and electrolyte balance have no fecal leukocytes present in the stool and complain of watery diarrhea; fever is usually absent or mild. Although nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain may also be present, the dominant feature is intestinal fluid loss. In contrast, patients infected with an enteric pathogen that causes significant cell destruction and inflammation have fecal leukocytes present in the stool (Figure 75-6). Their diarrhea is often characterized by the presence of mucus and blood; in many of these patients, fever is a prominent component of their disease, as well as abdominal pain, cramps, and tenesmus. Finally, patients who become infected with a pathogen capable of penetrating the intestinal mucosa of the small intestine without producing enterocolitis and then subsequently spreading and multiplying at other sites will present with signs and symptoms of a systemic illness such as headache, sore throat, malaise, and fever; diarrhea in these patients is not a prominent feature and is absent or mild in many cases. Features of these three types of enteric infections are summarized in Table 75-3.

Epidemiology

Gastrointestinal infections occur in numerous epidemiologic settings. Awareness of these different settings is important because knowledge of a particular epidemiologic setting can help provide a basis for the diagnosis and clues to possible etiologies. When this knowledge is combined with clinical findings, the etiology of the infection can often be narrowed to three or four organisms.

Institutional Settings

Diarrheal illness can be a major problem in institutional settings such as day care centers, hospitals, and nursing homes. Because individual hygiene is often difficult to maintain in these settings, coupled with the presence of several organisms with relatively low infecting doses such as Shigella and Giardia lamblia, numerous outbreaks of diarrheal illness caused by various organisms have been reported. Organisms such as Shigella, Campylobacter jejuni, Giardia lamblia, Cryptosporidium, and rotaviruses have been reported to cause outbreaks in day care centers. Of significance, these infections can be spread to family members. Similarly, outbreaks caused by these organisms, as well as hemorrhagic E. coli O157:H7, have been reported in nursing homes and other extended-care facilities.

Nosocomial diarrheal illness is also a problem for hospital patients and personnel. Rotaviruses, adenoviruses, and Coxsackie viruses have also been identified in nosocomial settings. In addition to these organisms, Clostridium difficile is a major nosocomial enteric pathogen in hospitals and other settings, including nursing homes and extended-care facilities. This organism is a hardy pathogen that readily survives on fomites (inanimate objects) such as floors, bed rails, call buttons, and doorknobs, and on the hands of hospital personnel caring for the patient. Of clinical concern is the emergence of a strain of C. difficile with increased virulence and fluoroquinolone resistance. By virtue of partial deletions in a toxin regulatory gene, tcdC, these isolates are able to produce 16- to 23-fold more toxin A and B. In addition, a separate binary toxin has been described that is encoded by cdtA and cdtB genes; cdtB mediates cell surface binding and cellular translocation, whereas cdtA disrupts the assembly of the actin filament, causing cell death. These strains have emerged as a cause of geographically dispersed outbreaks of C. difficile–associated disease. Many of the reported cases caused by these strains were in otherwise healthy patients with minimal or no exposure to a health care setting. C. difficile is the most common pathogen isolated in patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea. However, antibiotic-associated hemorrhagic colitis (AAHC) is not linked to C. difficile infection. AAHC symptoms include a sudden onset of bloody diarrhea and abdominal cramps during antibiotic therapy. Toxin-producing Klebsiella oxytoca has been identified as a causative agent of AAHC.

Food- and Water-Borne Outbreaks

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicate that more than 48 million cases of food-borne illness are reported in the United States each year. Eating raw or undercooked fish, shellfish, or meats and drinking unpasteurized milk increases the risks of certain bacterial, parasitic, and viral infections. Many food-borne outbreaks can be traced to poor hygienic practices of food handlers such as not washing hands after using the toilet; hepatitis A, Norwalk virus, and Salmonella are a few examples of organisms that have contaminated food during preparation by a food handler and causing diarrheal disease. The number of cases of salmonellosis has gradually increased, with many of these infections associated with eating raw or undercooked eggs. Also, the potential for widespread dissemination of food-borne pathogens has increased because of factors such as the tendency to eat outside the home, the export and import of food sources worldwide, and travel.

In addition to food-borne outbreaks of GI tract infections, water-borne outbreaks of diarrheal disease caused by Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium have been traced to inadequately filtered surface water. Recreational waters, including swimming pools, can also become contaminated with enteric pathogens such as Shigella and G. lamblia because of poor toilet facilities or practices.

Immunocompromised Hosts

GI tract infections in individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other patients who are immunosuppressed, such as organ transplant recipients or individuals receiving chemotherapy, are a diagnostic challenge for the clinician and microbiologist. For example, cytotoxic chemotherapy or antibiotic therapy may predispose patients to develop C. difficile colitis.

Diarrhea is a common clinical manifestation of infection with HIV. Numerous pathogens and opportunistic pathogens have been identified and are believed to cause recurrent or chronic diarrhea. Commonly reported etiologic agents include the following:

Etiologic Agents

Many microorganisms are able to cause enteric infections. A discussion of each organism is beyond the scope of this chapter. Rather, these organisms are addressed in Parts III through VI of the textbook. Table 75-4 summarizes the general characteristics of the more common agents of enteric infections.

TABLE 75-4

General Characteristics of the Common Agents of Enteric Infections

Organism Common Sources or Predisposing Condition Distribution Clinical Presentation Predominant Pathogenic Mechanism Fecal Leukocytes
Bacillus cereus Meats, vegetables, rice Worldwide Intoxication: vomiting or watery diarrhea Ingestion of preformed toxin (food poisoning)
Clostridium botulinum Improperly preserved vegetables, meat, fish Worldwide Neuromuscular paralysis Ingestion of preformed toxin (food poisoning)
Staphylococcus aureus Meats, salads, dairy products Worldwide Intoxication: vomiting Ingestion of preformed toxin (food poisoning)
Clostridium perfringens Meats, poultry Worldwide Watery diarrhea Ingestion of organism followed by toxin production
Aeromonas Water Worldwide Watery diarrhea or dysentery ? Enterotoxin
? Cytotoxin
Campylobacter spp. Water, poultry, milk Worldwide Dysentery ? Invasion
? Cytotoxins
+
Clostridium difficile Antimicrobial therapy Worldwide Dysentery Enterotoxin and cytotoxin +/−
Diarrheogenic Escherichia coli          
Enteropathogenic (EPEC) ? Worldwide Watery diarrhea Adherence/? invasion without multiplication
Enterotoxigenic (ETEC) Food, water Worldwide—more prevalent in developing countries Watery diarrhea Enterotoxin
Enteroinvasive (EIEC) Food Worldwide Dysentery Invasion, enterotoxin +
Enterohemorrhagic (VTEC/STEC/EHEC) Meats Worldwide Watery, often bloody diarrhea Cytotoxin −/+
Plesiomonas shigelloides Fresh water, shellfish Worldwide ? Dysentery Unknown ?
Enterotoxin
+/−
Salmonella spp. (nontyphoidal) Food, water Worldwide Dysentery Invasion +
Salmonella enterica Typhi Food, water Tropical, developing countries Enteric fever Penetration + (monocytes, not PMNs)
Shigella spp. Food, water Worldwide Dysentery Invasion +
Shigella dysenteriae Water Tropical, developing countries Dysentery Invasion, cytotoxin +
Vibrio cholerae Water, shellfish Asia, Africa, Middle East, South and North American (along coastal areas) Watery diarrhea ? Enterotoxin
Cytotoxin
−/+
Yersinia enterocolitica Milk, pork, water Worldwide Watery diarrhea and/or enteric fever ? Invasion
? Penetration
Giardia lamblia Food, water Worldwide Watery diarrhea Unknown-impaired absorption
Cryptosporidium parvum Animals, water Worldwide Watery diarrhea ? Adherence
Entamoeba histolytica Food, water Worldwide (more common in developing countries) Dysentery Invasion, cytotoxin −/+ (amebae destroy the white cells)
Rotavirus ? Worldwide Watery diarrhea Mucosal damage leading to impaired absorption in small intestine
Norwalk viruses Shellfish, salads Worldwide Watery diarrhea Mucosal damage leading to impaired absorption in small intestine

image

Other Infections of the Gastrointestinal Tract

Besides causing disease in the small and large intestine, microorganisms can also infect other sites of the GI tract, as well as the GI tract’s accessory organs.

Miscellaneous

Unusual agents and those that have not been cultured, such as mycobacteria that may be associated with Crohn’s disease and the bacterium associated with Whipple’s disease, identified by molecular methods as a new agent, Tropheryma whipplei, are also candidates as etiologic agents of GI disease. Occasionally, stool cultures from patients with diarrheal disease yield heavy growth of organisms such as enterococci, Pseudomonas spp., or Klebsiella pneumoniae, not usually found in such numbers as normal flora. Only anecdotal evidence suggests that these organisms actually contribute to the pathogenesis of the diarrhea. Agents of sexually transmitted disease may cause GI symptoms when they are introduced into the colon via sexual intercourse. Mycobacterium avium intracellulare complex may be sexually transmitted, resulting in systemic disease in patients with AIDS. The pathogenesis of infections resulting from Blastocystis hominis (a possible coccidian etiologic agent of human diarrheal disease) is not well documented, although these organisms are associated with GI symptoms.

Laboratory Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Tract Infections

Specimen Collection and Transport

If enteric pathogens are to be detected by the laboratory, adherence to appropriate guidelines for specimen collection and transport is imperative (see Table 5-1 for a quick guide to specimen collection, transport, and processing). If an etiologic agent is not isolated with the first culture or visual examination, two additional specimens should be submitted to the laboratory over the next few days. Because organisms may be shed intermittently, collection of specimens at different times over several days enhances recovery. Certain infectious agents, such as Giardia, may be difficult to detect, requiring the processing of multiple specimens over weeks, duodenal aspirates (in the case of Giardia), or additional alternative methods.

Stool Specimens for Bacterial Culture

If a delay longer than 2 hours is anticipated for stools for bacterial culture, the specimen should be placed in transport medium. The Cary-Blair transport medium preserves the viability of intestinal bacterial pathogens, including Campylobacter and Vibrio spp. However, the media produced by different manufacturers can vary. Most workers recommend reducing the agar content of Cary-Blair medium from 0.5% to 0.16% (modified) for maintenance of Campylobacter spp. Buffered glycerol transport medium does not maintain these bacteria. Several manufacturers produce a small vial of Cary-Blair with a self-contained plastic scoop suitable for collecting samples.

Because Shigella spp. are sensitive to environmental factors, a transport medium of equal parts of glycerol and 0.033 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) increases the viability of Shigella in comparison to Cary-Blair. For this purpose, maintaining the glycerol transport medium at refrigerator or freezer temperatures also improves recovery.

If stool is unavailable, a rectal swab may be substituted for bacterial or viral culture, but it is not as good, particularly for diagnosis in adults. For suspected intestinal infection with Campylobacter, the swab must be placed in Cary-Blair transport medium immediately to avoid drying. Swabs are not acceptable for the detection of parasites, toxins, or viral antigens.

Miscellaneous Specimen Types

Other specimens that may be obtained for diagnosis of GI tract infection include duodenal aspirates. These samples should be examined immediately using direct microscopy for the presence of motile protozoan trophozoites, cultured for bacteria, and placed into polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fixative for subsequent parasitic examination. The laboratory should be informed in advance so that the specimen can be processed and examined efficiently.

The string test has proved useful for diagnosing duodenal parasites, such as Giardia, and for isolating Salmonella enterica Typhi from carriers and patients with acute typhoid fever. The patient swallows a weighted gelatin capsule containing a tightly wound length of string, which is left protruding from the mouth and taped to the cheek. After a predetermined period, during which the capsule reaches the duodenum and dissolves, the string, now covered with duodenal contents, is retracted and delivered immediately to the laboratory. There the technologist, using sterile-gloved fingers, strips the mucus and secretions attached to the string and deposits some material on slides for direct examination and some material into fixative for preparation of permanent stained mounts. The technologist also inoculates some material to appropriate media for isolation of bacteria.

Direct Detection of Agents of Gastroenteritis in Feces

Wet Mounts

A direct wet mount of fecal material, particularly with liquid or unformed stool, is the fastest method for detecting motile trophozoites of Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba, Giardia, and other intestinal parasites. Occasionally the larvae or adult worms of other parasites may be visualized. Experienced observers can also see the refractile forms of Cryptosporidia and many types of cysts on the direct wet mount, including Cyclospora cayetanensis, a parasite that is associated with the consumption of contaminated food such as raspberries. If present in sufficient numbers, the ova of intestinal parasites can be seen.

Examination of a direct wet mount of fecal material containing blood or mucus, with the addition of an equal portion of Loeffler’s methylene blue, is helpful for detection of leukocytes, which occasionally aids in differentiating among the various types of diarrheal syndromes. Another commercially available test detects lactoferrin, which is a glycoprotein released from neutrophil granules into the stool sample. This assay demonstrates improved sensitivity and specificity as compared to detection of intact WBCs. Under phase-contrast and dark-field microscopy, the darting motility and curved forms of Campylobacter may be observed in a warm sample. Water or saline, which will immobilize Campylobacter, should not be used. However, for practical reasons most laboratories do not use a wet mount.

Antigen Detection

An accurate, sensitive, indirect fluorescent antibody stain for giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis is commercially available. These organisms can be visualized easily and unequivocally with a monoclonal antibody fluorescent stain (Meridian Diagnostics, Cincinnati, Ohio). Park and colleagues described a simple and rapid screening procedure using a direct fluorescent antibody stain for E. coli O157:H7.

Enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) can detect numerous microorganisms capable of causing GI tract infections. For example, EIAs are commercially available to detect E. coli O157:H7 and Campylobacter spp., the presence of the Shiga toxins produced by EHEC, or the presence of C. difficile toxins A or A and B. In addition, rotavirus is detected using a solid-phase EIA procedure. EIA methods are also available for detection of antigens of Cryptosporidium and Giardia lamblia as well as E. histolytica. EIA methods have also been evaluated for detection of certain bacterial pathogens. The laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile has been inadequate when using traditional EIAs. Newer kits are coupling glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and A/B toxin in a combination assay. However, the combination kits do not seem to be more specific than a GDH assay alone. Laboratories have demonstrated excellent sensitivity and specificity using the GDH assay followed with PCR for definitive confirmation.

Culture of Fecal Material for Isolation of Etiologic Agents

Bacteria

Fecal specimens for culture should be inoculated to several media for maximal yield, including solid agar and broth. The choice of media is arbitrary and based on the particular requirements of the clinician and the laboratory. Recommendations for selection of media are included in this section.

Organisms for Routine Culture.

Stools received for routine culture in most clinical laboratories in the United States should be examined for the presence of Campylobacter, Salmonella, and Shigella spp. under all circumstances. Detection of Aeromonas and Plesiomonas spp. should be incorporated into routine stool culture procedures. The cost of doing a stool examination on every patient for all potential enteric pathogens is prohibitive. The decision as to what other bacteria are routinely cultured should take into account the incidence of GI tract infections caused by particular etiologic agents in the area served by the laboratory. For example, if the incidence of Yersinia enterocolitica gastroenteritis is high enough in the area served by the laboratory, then this agent should also be sought routinely. Similarly, because of the increasing prevalence of disease caused by Vibrio spp. in individuals living in high-risk areas of the United States (sea coast), laboratories in these localities may routinely look for these organisms. Conversely, unless a patient has a significant travel history, a laboratory located in the Midwestern United States should not routinely look for these organisms except by special request. Protocols for culture of enterohemorrhagic E. coli (e.g., E. coli O157:H7) vary greatly; based on incidence of disease, laboratories routinely culture for this organism when cases of severe diarrhea are implicated. Selective or screening media to detect E. coli O157:H7 also vary greatly, including using a 1% sorbitol-containing medium (most O157:H7 E. coli are sorbitol-negative), a specific trypticase blood agar (Unipath GmbH, Wesel, Germany), RambaCHROM (Gibson Laboratories, LLC, Lexington, Ky), CHROMagar (BD Diagnostics, Franklin Lakes, N.J.) or Rainbow Agar O157 (Bio-log, Inc., Hayward, California).

Routine Culture Methods.

An in-depth discussion regarding culture of all enteric pathogens is beyond the scope of this chapter. Because U.S. laboratories should routinely examine stools for the presence of salmonella, Shigella, and Campylobacter spp., culture of these organisms is addressed. Culture conditions for all other pathogens, including viruses, are covered in Parts III, IV, and VI. Specimens received for detection of the most frequently isolated Enterobacteriaceae and Salmonella and Shigella spp. should be plated to a supportive medium, a slightly selective and differential medium, and a moderately selective medium.

Blood agar (tryptic soy agar with 5% sheep blood) is an excellent general supportive medium. Blood agar medium allows growth of yeast species, staphylococci, and enterococci, in addition to gram-negative bacilli. The absence of normal gram-negative fecal flora or the presence of significant quantities of organisms such as Staphylococcus aureus, yeasts, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa can be evaluated. The use of blood agar also provides colonies for oxidase testing. Several colonies that do not resemble Pseudomonas from the third or fourth quadrant should be routinely screened for production of cytochrome oxidase. If numerous colonies are present, Aeromonas, Vibrio, or Plesiomonas spp. should be suspected.

The slightly selective agar should support growth of most Enterobacteriaceae, vibrios, and other possible pathogens; MacConkey agar works well. Some laboratories use eosin-methylene blue (EMB), which is slightly more inhibitory. All lactose-negative colonies should be tested further, ensuring adequate detection of most vibrios and most pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae. Lactose-positive vibrios (V. vulnificus), pathogenic E. coli, some Aeromonas spp., and Plesiomonas spp. may not be distinctive on MacConkey agar.

Salmonella/Shigella.

The specimen should also be inoculated to a moderately selective agar such as Hektoen enteric (HE) or xylose-lysine desoxycholate (XLD) media. These media inhibit growth of most Enterobacteriaceae, allowing Salmonella and Shigella spp. to be detected. Colony morphologies of lactose-negative, lactose-positive, and H2S-producing organisms are illustrated in Figure 75-7. Other highly selective enteric media, such as salmonella-shigella, bismuth sulfite, deoxycholate, or brilliant green, may inhibit some strains of Salmonella or Shigella. All these media are incubated at 35° to 37° C in ambient air and examined at 24 and 48 hours for suspicious colonies.

Campylobacter.

Cultures for isolation of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli should be inoculated to a selective agar containing antimicrobial agents that suppress the growth of normal flora. The introduction of a blood-free, charcoal-containing medium containing selective antibiotic components has improved recovery of most enteropathogenic Campylobacter spp. Brucella broth base has yielded less satisfactory recovery of Campylobacter spp. Commercially produced agar plates for isolation of campylobacters are available from several manufacturers. These plates are incubated in a microaerophilic atmosphere at 42° C and examined at 24 and 48 hours for suspicious colonies. Culture methods for other campylobacters associated with GI disease, such as C. hyointestinalis and C. fetus subsp. fetus, are provided in Chapter 34.

Enrichment Broths.

Enrichment broths are sometimes used for enhanced recovery of Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, and Y. enterocolitica, although Shigella usually does not survive enrichment. Gram-negative broth (Hajna GN) or selenite F broth yields good recovery. Enrichment broths for Enterobacteriaceae should be incubated in air at 35° C for 6 to 8 hours and then several drops should be subcultured to at least two selective media. A commercial system that allows broth to be tested for antigen of Salmonella or Shigella directly has been described; however, the reported sensitivity is lower than desired. Stool would be inoculated to broth initially; those broths that test negative could be discarded without subculturing. Campy-thioglycollate enrichment broth increases the yields of positive cultures for Campylobacter spp., although it is not necessary for routine use. Enrichment broth for Campylobacter is refrigerated overnight or for a minimum of 8 hours before a few drops are plated to Campylobacter agar and incubated at 42° C in a microaerophilic atmosphere.

Laboratory Diagnosis of Clostridium Difficile–associated Diarrhea

The definitive diagnosis of C. difficile–associated diarrhea is based on clinical criteria combined with laboratory testing. Visualization of a characteristic pseudomembrane or plaque on endoscopy is diagnostic for pseudomembranous colitis and, with the appropriate history of prior antibiotic use, meets the criteria for diagnosis of antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis. No single laboratory test will establish the diagnosis unequivocally. Two tests are available for routine use: culture, detection of cytotoxin by tissue culture, and antigen detection assays (e.g., enzyme immunoassay, latex agglutination) for C. difficile toxin. In addition, many laboratories are now using polymerase chain reaction and the technically less demanding loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Commercially available PCR assays include BD Gene Ohm (BD Diagnostics, La Jolla, CA), Cepheid Xpert (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA), Roche Lightcycler (Roche Applied Science), and Progastro (Hologic-Gen-Probe (San Diego, CA). According to a recent study, PCR demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhea. Insufficient data are not currently available to determine the diagnostic usefulness of LAMP; additional studies are needed.

Case Study 75-2

A 52-year-old female on immune-suppressive therapy for rheumatoid arthritis presents with a 2-day history of severe, watery diarrhea. This is accompanied by chills and reported fever of 101° F. She has no complaints of nausea or myalgias, but she does have severe abdominal cramps and loss of appetite. She had recently visited her niece who had just purchased a pet turtle. She reports no other significant travel history or ill contacts and is treated with antidiarrheal medications as an outpatient.

On the third day of illness she returns in a worsening condition with the following physical exam and laboratory results:

She is admitted to the hospital for rehydration, potassium replacement, and additional investigation. The initial diagnosis is sepsis syndrome. Because diarrhea is the major feature of her illness, a stool sample is submitted for culture and fecal WBC count.

The patient rapidly convalesced by the second day of admission on empiric triple antibiotic therapy. While hospitalized, her niece became ill with severe diarrhea and was successfully treated as an outpatient.