Gamma Knife® Radiosurgery for Convexity and Parasagittal Meningiomas

Published on 26/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurosurgery

Last modified 26/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2119 times

CHAPTER 51 Gamma Knife® Radiosurgery for Convexity and Parasagittal Meningiomas

INTRODUCTION

Meningiomas arise from arachnoidal cap cells, and more than 90% of them are benign.1,2 As these tumors are encapsulated, complete resection is the preferred treatment. However; complete tumor resection is not always possible. Even if complete resection is successfully achieved, tumor recurrence is not uncommon during the long-term follow-up period. It has been reported that 20% to 30% of patients who had complete resection of their tumor, experienced recurrence in the follow-up period of 10 to 15 years.35 In cases of residual tumor, long-term tumor progression rates are higher, and tumor growth is demonstrated in 60% to 90% at follow-up of longer than 10 years.36 Therefore, in incompletely resected meningiomas, especially in atypical or anaplastic meningiomas, external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) has been commonly performed, resulting in improved local tumor control.79 However, despite improved local tumor control, EBRT can cause long-term complications such as cognitive decline, pituitary insufficiency, or radiation-induced tumors. Recently, stereotactic radiosurgery has emerged as an alternative to EBRT or surgical resection and has gained more and more importance in the management of meningiomas, especially in those that cannot be completely resected, such as many skull-base meningiomas.

The majority of convexity meningiomas can be completely resected. On the other hand, it is sometimes difficult to completely remove parasagittal meningiomas, as these tumors often invade the superior sagittal sinus and the sacrifice of the sinus can lead to severe brain edema and venous infarction. Open surgery, rather than radiosurgery, must be the treatment of choice for these superficially located meningiomas when it can be safely performed without causing any new neurologic deficits, because radiosurgery is more likely to cause postradiosurgical symptomatic edema than in skull-base meningiomas. Despite these facts, Gamma Knife® radiosurgery (GKRS) has been increasingly used as a primary treatment, particularly in cases where patients are at high risk of operative morbidity or mortality, or refuse open surgery.

PATIENT SELECTION

In general, the appropriate tumor size for GKRS is 3 cm or less of mean diameter. If the tumor size is more than 3 cm in diameter, surgical resection should be the first choice of treatment, and if there is residual tumor left, stereotactic radiosurgery should be performed as an adjuvant treatment. Unlike in skull-base meningiomas that are adjacent to critical neurovascular structures, most convexity meningiomas can be completely removed with the meningeal attachment without neurologic complications. For this reason, surgical resection is undoubtedly the first choice of treatment in patients harboring relatively large convexity meningiomas compressing the brain parenchyma. On the other hand, this is not the case with parasagittal meningiomas, as these tumors are located adjacent to the superior sagittal sinus and bridging veins and sometimes invade these vascular structures. To remove the tumor invading the superior sagittal sinus, venous reconstruction may be necessary. Therefore, after safely removing as much tumor outside the sinus as possible, stereotactic radiosurgery to the residual tumor may be recommended to prevent tumor recurrence.

Recently, GKRS as a primary treatment has been increasingly performed in convexity or parasagittal meningiomas, because numerous investigators have reported the efficacy of GKRS for benign meningiomas. When patients present with neurologic symptoms caused by peritumoral edema, surgical resection is a better choice to relieve their symptoms quickly. When the tumor is found incidentally and if there are no neurologic symptoms, open surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, or only observation may be selected. In incidentally found meningiomas, patient age, tumor size, or location must be taken into consideration. In elderly patients, observation of the tumor with serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be advised. Small tumors can also be followed with imaging. However; if patients are willing and consent to radiosurgery, GKRS can be selected for small tumors with a mean diameter of 3 cm or less to avoid future tumor growth.

TUMOR CONTROL AND PREDICTIVE FACTORS

To date, numerous investigators have reported the results of stereotactic radiosurgery application to meningiomas in various locations, demonstrating 75% to 100% local tumor control rates at 5 to 10 years.2,1025 To the best of our knowledge, there are only few large studies focusing on superficially located meningiomas treated alone with stereotactic radiosurgery, as most neurosurgeons prefer surgical resection to radiosurgery to treat this type of benign tumor. According to a multicenter review in 1998 by Kondziolka and colleagues,16 in 203 patients with parasagittal meningiomas, all patients were treated by GKRS and the actuarial 5-year tumor control rates were 93% ± 4% and 60% ± 10% in the primary and adjuvant treatment group, respectively. None of the patients having tumors smaller than 7.5 cm3, and no prior open surgery, required additional therapy and their neurologic function have remained stable. The authors also insisted that most treatment failures resulted from remote tumor growth. The rate of transient, symptomatic edema after GKRS was 16% and this complication was more common with larger tumors within 2 years. Kondziolka and colleagues32 reported 972 patients with intracranial meningiomas, and 239 meningiomas were located at the parasagittal region and convexity. The morbidity rate for the parasagittal location was 9.7%. Kollova and colleagues2 reported the treatment results of 368 patients who had benign meningiomas in various locations with a median follow-up of 60 months. They demonstrated an actuarial 5-year tumor control rate of 98% and a postradiosurgical peritumoral edema rate of 15%. They found that treatment failures significantly occurred in men and in tumors treated at a marginal dose of less than 12 Gy. Significant risk factors for postradiosurgical edema were patient age older than 60 years, no prior surgery, prelesional edema before radiosurgery, tumor volume greater than 10 cm3, tumor location in the anterior fossa, and a marginal dose of greater than 16 Gy. Kim and colleagues15 found postradiosurgical symptomatic edema in 43% of superficially located meningiomas. They documented that parasagittal lesions had a tendency to severe postradiosurgical edema. Chang and colleagues1 found in their meningioma series of 179 patients that convexity, parasagittal and falx meningiomas that were deeply embedded in the cortex developed postradiosurgical edema more frequently and tumor location was the only risk factor for it. Approximately 60% of patients who had postradiosurgical edema were asymptomatic and their symptoms were all transient. Postradiosurgical edema was found in four of 79 skull-base meningiomas (5%), compared with 26 of 52 hemispheric meningiomas (50%). Kalapurakal and colleagues26 suggested that parasagittal location, presence of pretreatment edema, and sagittal sinus occlusion were significant predictors for the development of brain edema after stereotactic radiosurgery and radiation therapy. They noted that all of the patients who developed severe posttreatment life-threatening panhemispheric edema had parasagittal meningiomas.

Concerning atypical and anaplastic meningiomas, it is difficult to achieve long-term tumor control even with relatively high-dose radiosurgery. Harris and colleagues27

Buy Membership for Neurosurgery Category to continue reading. Learn more here