Gamma Knife® Radiosurgery for Convexity and Parasagittal Meningiomas

Published on 26/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurosurgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

This article have been viewed 2228 times

CHAPTER 51 Gamma Knife® Radiosurgery for Convexity and Parasagittal Meningiomas

Toshinori Hasegawa, Jun Yoshida

INTRODUCTION

Meningiomas arise from arachnoidal cap cells, and more than 90% of them are benign.^1,² As these tumors are encapsulated, complete resection is the preferred treatment. However; complete tumor resection is not always possible. Even if complete resection is successfully achieved, tumor recurrence is not uncommon during the long-term follow-up period. It has been reported that 20% to 30% of patients who had complete resection of their tumor, experienced recurrence in the follow-up period of 10 to 15 years.³^–⁵ In cases of residual tumor, long-term tumor progression rates are higher, and tumor growth is demonstrated in 60% to 90% at follow-up of longer than 10 years.³^–⁶ Therefore, in incompletely resected meningiomas, especially in atypical or anaplastic meningiomas, external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) has been commonly performed, resulting in improved local tumor control.⁷^–⁹ However, despite improved local tumor control, EBRT can cause long-term complications such as cognitive decline, pituitary insufficiency, or radiation-induced tumors. Recently, stereotactic radiosurgery has emerged as an alternative to EBRT or surgical resection and has gained more and more importance in the management of meningiomas, especially in those that cannot be completely resected, such as many skull-base meningiomas.

The majority of convexity meningiomas can be completely resected. On the other hand, it is sometimes difficult to completely remove parasagittal meningiomas, as these tumors often invade the superior sagittal sinus and the sacrifice of the sinus can lead to severe brain edema and venous infarction. Open surgery, rather than radiosurgery, must be the treatment of choice for these superficially located meningiomas when it can be safely performed without causing any new neurologic deficits, because radiosurgery is more likely to cause postradiosurgical symptomatic edema than in skull-base meningiomas. Despite these facts, Gamma Knife® radiosurgery (GKRS) has been increasingly used as a primary treatment, particularly in cases where patients are at high risk of operative morbidity or mortality, or refuse open surgery.

PATIENT SELECTION

In general, the appropriate tumor size for GKRS is 3 cm or less of mean diameter. If the tumor size is more than 3 cm in diameter, surgical resection should be the first choice of treatment, and if there is residual tumor left, stereotactic radiosurgery should be performed as an adjuvant treatment. Unlike in skull-base meningiomas that are adjacent to critical neurovascular structures, most convexity meningiomas can be completely removed with the meningeal attachment without neurologic complications. For this reason, surgical resection is undoubtedly the first choice of treatment in patients harboring relatively large convexity meningiomas compressing the brain parenchyma. On the other hand, this is not the case with parasagittal meningiomas, as these tumors are located adjacent to the superior sagittal sinus and bridging veins and sometimes invade these vascular structures. To remove the tumor invading the superior sagittal sinus, venous reconstruction may be necessary. Therefore, after safely removing as much tumor outside the sinus as possible, stereotactic radiosurgery to the residual tumor may be recommended to prevent tumor recurrence.

Recently, GKRS as a primary treatment has been increasingly performed in convexity or parasagittal meningiomas, because numerous investigators have reported the efficacy of GKRS for benign meningiomas. When patients present with neurologic symptoms caused by peritumoral edema, surgical resection is a better choice to relieve their symptoms quickly. When the tumor is found incidentally and if there are no neurologic symptoms, open surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, or only observation may be selected. In incidentally found meningiomas, patient age, tumor size, or location must be taken into consideration. In elderly patients, observation of the tumor with serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be advised. Small tumors can also be followed with imaging. However; if patients are willing and consent to radiosurgery, GKRS can be selected for small tumors with a mean diameter of 3 cm or less to avoid future tumor growth.

RADIOSURGICAL TECHNIQUES

At our institute, Gamma Knife radiosurgery is performed using the Leksell stereotactic frame (Model G; Elekta Instruments, Sweden, AB). During Gamma Knife radiosurgery; first, the frame is applied to the patient under mild sedation and local anesthesia, then MRI or computed tomography (CT) scan is performed. Axial and coronal T1-weighted images with contrast enhancement are usually used for dose-planning. Patient treatment is planned using GammaPlan® software. After dose planning, GKRS is performed. Axial gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR images obtained in a 47-year-old woman, showing a left convexity meningioma, which has been treated in our institution with GKRS at a margin dose of 14 Gy (A), is presented in Figure 51-1. It is important to target the entire tumor, including the dural tail to achieve long-term tumor control, in the dose planning for meningiomas.

FIGURE 51-1 Axial gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR images obtained in a 47-year-old woman, showing a left convexity meningioma, which was treated with GKS at a margin dose of 14 Gy (A). Although asymptomatic peritumoral edema developed at 3 months after GKS (B), it resolved within 2 years and the tumor decreased in volume at 6 years after GKS (C).

TUMOR CONTROL AND PREDICTIVE FACTORS

To date, numerous investigators have reported the results of stereotactic radiosurgery application to meningiomas in various locations, demonstrating 75% to 100% local tumor control rates at 5 to 10 years.^2,¹⁰^–²⁵ To the best of our knowledge, there are only few large studies focusing on superficially located meningiomas treated alone with stereotactic radiosurgery, as most neurosurgeons prefer surgical resection to radiosurgery to treat this type of benign tumor. According to a multicenter review in 1998 by Kondziolka and colleagues,¹⁶ in 203 patients with parasagittal meningiomas, all patients were treated by GKRS and the actuarial 5-year tumor control rates were 93% ± 4% and 60% ± 10% in the primary and adjuvant treatment group, respectively. None of the patients having tumors smaller than 7.5 cm³, and no prior open surgery, required additional therapy and their neurologic function have remained stable. The authors also insisted that most treatment failures resulted from remote tumor growth. The rate of transient, symptomatic edema after GKRS was 16% and this complication was more common with larger tumors within 2 years. Kondziolka and colleagues³² reported 972 patients with intracranial meningiomas, and 239 meningiomas were located at the parasagittal region and convexity. The morbidity rate for the parasagittal location was 9.7%. Kollova and colleagues² reported the treatment results of 368 patients who had benign meningiomas in various locations with a median follow-up of 60 months. They demonstrated an actuarial 5-year tumor control rate of 98% and a postradiosurgical peritumoral edema rate of 15%. They found that treatment failures significantly occurred in men and in tumors treated at a marginal dose of less than 12 Gy. Significant risk factors for postradiosurgical edema were patient age older than 60 years, no prior surgery, prelesional edema before radiosurgery, tumor volume greater than 10 cm³, tumor location in the anterior fossa, and a marginal dose of greater than 16 Gy. Kim and colleagues¹⁵ found postradiosurgical symptomatic edema in 43% of superficially located meningiomas. They documented that parasagittal lesions had a tendency to severe postradiosurgical edema. Chang and colleagues¹ found in their meningioma series of 179 patients that convexity, parasagittal and falx meningiomas that were deeply embedded in the cortex developed postradiosurgical edema more frequently and tumor location was the only risk factor for it. Approximately 60% of patients who had postradiosurgical edema were asymptomatic and their symptoms were all transient. Postradiosurgical edema was found in four of 79 skull-base meningiomas (5%), compared with 26 of 52 hemispheric meningiomas (50%). Kalapurakal and colleagues²⁶ suggested that parasagittal location, presence of pretreatment edema, and sagittal sinus occlusion were significant predictors for the development of brain edema after stereotactic radiosurgery and radiation therapy. They noted that all of the patients who developed severe posttreatment life-threatening panhemispheric edema had parasagittal meningiomas.

Concerning atypical and anaplastic meningiomas, it is difficult to achieve long-term tumor control even with relatively high-dose radiosurgery. Harris and colleagues ²⁷ reported 30 patients who were treated with GKRS including 18 atypical and 12 anaplastic meningiomas. The actuarial 5-year overall survival was 59% for both atypical and anaplastic meningiomas. The 5-year progression-free survival was 83% and 72% in patients with atypical and anaplastic meninigomas, respectively. They noted that early adjuvant radiosurgery after craniotomy was a significant factor for better progression-free survival. Similarly, Stafford and colleagues²⁴ documented that the actuarial 5-year local tumor control rates were 68% and 0% for atypical and anaplastic meningiomas, respectively, compared with 93% for benign meningiomas.

Kobayashi and colleagues ³³ reported 87 cases of benign meningioma and showed a minimal size reduction of 16.1% and a response rate of 8.0%, but a higher control rate of 93%. Side effects were found in 12 cases (13.8%): radiation-induced edema in 9, hearing disturbance in 2, and visual deterioration in 1.

Hasegawa and colleagues ¹³ reported long-term results of 111 patients with cavernous sinus meningiomas treated using GKRS. They demonstrated that the actuarial 5- or 10-year focal tumor control was 94% and 92%, respectively. Lee and colleagues¹⁷ also documented actuarial tumor control rates of 97.5% at both 5 and 10 years in 79 patients harboring cavernous sinus meningiomas. Although this difference may be caused simply by patient selection, superficially located meningiomas may be more radioresistant than skull-base meningiomas, as it has been demonstrated that a decrease in tumor volume occurs sooner after radiosurgery in skull-base meningiomas. Treatment failure tends to occur from the tumor margin or outside the treatment volume, because GKRS has a characteristic heterogeneous dose distribution, indicating that the radiation dose is highest at the center of the tumor and gradually decreases toward the tumor margin. In addition, it is sometimes difficult to differentiate the tumor margin from normal dural tissue or superior sagittal sinus, especially in cases of parasagittal lesions. This may lead to relatively lower tumor control rates compared with meningiomas in other locations. As a prognostic factor, prior surgery was significantly important for progression-free survival (PFS). This indicates that prior surgery makes production of a treatment plan more complicated, as it is hard to distinguish residual tumor from postoperative changes on enhanced MR images. Moreover, the residual tumor is often divided into multiple pieces after surgery. These issues lead to out-of-field treatment failure. Even though out-of-field treatment failure has occurred, repeat GKRS can be effectively and safely used to control the tumor. To avoid these types of treatment failures, a carefully prepared conformal plan, including the correct tumor margin within the treatment volume, is essential. Currently, in our institute multiple isocenters are usually used to make a more homogeneous and conformal plan with automatic positioning system, which helps us treat complicated lesions most efficiently. With regard to radiologic features associated with tumor recurrence, lobulated and mushrooming meningiomas are more aggressive, whereas smooth and calcified meningiomas generally tend to be less active.^28,²⁹

Optimum Radiosurgical Dose

Meningiomas are generally considered to be radioresistant. Compared to other tumors, most benign meningiomas remain stable or even become slightly smaller on the long-term follow-up images after radiosurgery. Several investigators have reported the efficacy of lower-dose radiosurgery for benign meningiomas to date. Kondziolka and colleagues ¹⁶ noted that margin doses greater than 15 Gy did not provide better tumor control. Currently, in our institution we also decreased to a margin dose of 13 to 14 Gy in most cases. Irradiated dosage is limited by not only tumor volume but also by adjacent critical structures such as brain stem or cranial nerves, although this issue is rare in the cases of convexity or parasagittal meningiomas. For relatively large skull-base meningiomas adjacent to critical structures, lower-dose radiosurgery with a peripheral dose of 12 Gy or less may still be useful to prevent further tumor growth. Particularly in the cases of lesions which are adjacent or impinging on the optic apparatus, the marginal tumor dose should be reduced to 10 Gy or less to avoid optic neuropathy. However, further follow-up is necessary to determine whether low-dose radiosurgery with a margin dose of 14 Gy or less provide long-term tumor control.

Adverse Radiation Effect

Current evidence has shown that Gamma Knife radiosurgery is a safe treatment method for meningiomas. Numerous investigators reported that incidence of morbidity was less than 10% and the majority were transient. ^2,^13,^16,^17,^19,^24,³⁰ However, parasagittal or convexity meningiomas are more likely to have postradiosurgical peritumoral brain edema than skull-base tumors. If postradiosurgical symptomatic edema occurs, a course of steroids should be administered. If no improvement can be achieved, an open surgery should be considered without hesitation.

According to a literature review by Rogers and Mehta,³¹ postradiosurgical edema developed in 25% to 78% of patients with non-basal meningiomas, compared with 0 to 22% of patients with skull-base meningiomas. The development of brain edema is considered to be associated with the impairment of the blood–brain barrier, vascular endothelial growth factor affecting vascular permeability, mass effect with brain ischemia, and impaired venous drainage.² Parasagittal or convexity meningiomas have a broader pial interface and more pial blood supply than skull-base meningiomas surrounded by cistern. Accordingly, a larger volume of adjacent brain parenchyma is irradiated, and damaged, consequently leading to the development of postradiosurgical brain edema. In patients who had prior surgery, postradiosurgical edema is less common because the brain parenchyma is dissected from the tumor surface, disrupting the pial blood supply at the time of open surgery.² Superior sagittal sinus or bridging vein occlusion may also contribute to the development of postradiosurgical edema. As other factors, higher marginal dose and larger tumor volume are also considered to cause a higher incidence of post-radiosurgical edema.

Management Strategy

Current management strategy for meningiomas used in our institute is presented in Figure 51-2. The patients with tumor recurrence or residual tumor after open surgery are good candidates for GKRS. Particularly, tumors invading superior sagittal sinus should be treated using GKRS after removal of the tumor outside the tumor. Even when tumor size is relatively large with a mean diameter of 3 cm or more, low-dose radiosurgery may halt tumor growth. In patients harboring symptomatic tumors or tumors with peritumoral edema, we strongly recommend open surgery as the initial treatment. Parasagittal meningiomas with peritumoral edema should not be treated using stereotactic radiosurgery as the initial treatment; otherwise patients will develop severe postradiosurgical edema, eventually requiring surgical resection. Patients harboring asymptomatic tumors without peritumoral edema may be observed with serial imaging follow-up, or may select open surgery or radiosurgery depending on tumor size and location if patients provide informed consent, especially when further tumor growth would make the treatment more risky.

FIGURE 51-2 Management algorithm for patients with parasagittal, falx, and convexity meningiomas.

The role of radiosurgery in atypical and anaplastic meningiomas was also published in the literature. Recently Kondziolka and colleagues ³² reported an overall control rate for all intracranial meningiomas. Patients with WHO grade I meningiomas had a control rate of 93%, but for patients with WHO grade II and III tumors, the control rates were 50% and 17%, respectively.

Kano and colleagues ³⁴ published findings on 12 patients with 30 atypical or anaplastic meningiomas. Patients separated in two groups with treatment dose of 20 Gy. Tumor control rate was 29,4% in the group treated with less than 20 Gy and 63.1% in the group treated with 20 Gy.

AUTHORS’ EXPERIENCE

At our institution, we performed a retrospective study in 81 patients with 88 convexity, falx, or parasagittal benign meningiomas who were treated using GKRS between 1991 and 2002. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 51-1 and the tumor localization is indicated in Table 51-2. The actuarial 5- or 10-year PFS was 80% or 52%, respectively (Fig. 51-3). The actuarial 5- or 10-year local tumor control (LTC) was 89% or 72%, respectively. The factors affecting LTC or PFS rates were advanced patient age and having prior open surgery. No other factors were found to have a significant effect on PFS or LTC. On the follow-up radiological imaging, 17 patients (23%) developed peritumoral edema at 3 to 12 months after GKRS (Fig. 51-4). Seven patients had falx lesions, five had parasagittal lesions, three had cerebellar convexity lesions, and two had convexity lesions. Among them, four patients were symptomatic. Two patients developed motor weakness requiring surgical resection. One patient developed seizure caused by severe edema. Another patient died from severe peritumoral edema at 29 months after GKRS. No other adverse radiation effect was found during the follow-up period.

TABLE 51-1 Patient characteristics (N = 81)

Characteristics	Value
Age (years)	23–80 (mean 56)
Male : female (%)	28 (35) : 53 (65)
Prior surgery (%)
0	30 (37)
1	36 (44)
2	12 (15)
3	2 (2)
4	1 (1)
Follow-up (months)	4–182 (median 79)
Lost	6
≥5 years (%)	57 (76)
≥10 years (%)	15 (20)