Gallbladder Polyps

Published on 19/07/2015 by admin

Filed under Radiology

Last modified 19/07/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 4 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 7209 times

 Large polyps may show internal color flow vascularity

image “Comet tail” artifacts suggest cholesterol polyp
• CT: Useful for staging in larger polyps where ↑ risk of malignancy

image Difficult to visualize many polyps on CT due to lower spatial resolution
image Can show variable enhancement; no convincing correlation between enhancement and malignancy
image Useful for staging in larger polyps where ↑ risk of malignancy

TOP DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES

• Tumefactive sludge
• Gallstone
• Polypoid GB carcinoma
• GB metastases
• Adenomyomatosis

PATHOLOGY

• Classification

image Neoplastic: Adenoma, adenoma-carcinoma, miscellaneous (fibroma, lipoma, etc.)
image Nonneoplastic: Cholesterol polyp, adenomyoma, inflammatory polyp, choristoma

CLINICAL ISSUES

• Size is most important predictor of malignancy

image 100% of polyps > 20 mm are malignant
image 43-77% of polyps 10-20 mm are malignant
image 94% of benign polyps are < 10 mm
• Risk factors for malignancy: Age > 60, gallstones, coexistence of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)
• Reassuring factors: Stability over time, multiple polyps, pedunculated (versus sessile) morphology
• Current recommendations

image Cholecystectomy if patient is symptomatic or has cholelithiasis or PSC (regardless of polyp size)
image Polyp > 18-20 mm: Open cholecystectomy
image Polyp 10-20 mm: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
image Polyp 6-9 mm: Serial follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months
image Polyp ≤ 5 mm: Serial imaging (no consensus; malignancy is extremely rare and some advocate no follow-up)
image
(Left) Ultrasound of a 43-year-old woman with right upper quadrant pain shows mild gallbladder (GB) wall thickening and multiple small (< 5 mm), slightly echogenic polyps image. An elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for presumed biliary colic revealed cholesterolosis and cholesterol polyps.

image
(Right) Ultrasound image shows multiple polyps image in the GB that measure < 1 cm in size. While the data suggests nodules < 1 cm harbor a very low risk of malignancy, most society guidelines suggest imaging follow-up.
image
(Left) Ultrasound of a 41-year-old man with chest pain shows two 4-mm GB polyps image. Their small size, echogenicity, multiplicity, and stability at follow-up sonography indicate hyperplastic (cholesterol) polyps.

image
(Right) Ultrasound of a 47-year-old woman shows a 1-cm, pathologically confirmed adenomatous polyp image. The likelihood of neoplasia increases with polyp size, but most GB polyps are hyperplastic.

TERMINOLOGY

Definitions

• Polypoid or sessile mass protruding from gallbladder (GB) mucosa

IMAGING

General Features

• Best diagnostic clue

image Nonmobile hyperechoic mass protruding from GB mucosa without acoustic shadowing
• Location

image GB lumen
• Morphology

image Sessile or pedunculated

Imaging Recommendations

• Best imaging tool

image Ultrasound; endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)
• Protocol advice

image Grayscale and color Doppler US with 6 MHz transducer

CT Findings

• Often difficult to visualize on CT due to lower spatial resolution

image CT underestimates polyp size compared to US
• Best visualized on CECT due to vascularity of polyp

image Can show variable enhancement
image No convincing evidence that polyp enhancement pattern predicts malignancy
• Ill-defined margins of larger polyps possible predictor of malignancy
• Useful for local staging (including lymph node metastases, liver invasion, metastases) in larger polyps where risk of malignancy is high

Ultrasonographic Findings

• Ultrasound is insensitive (only 50%) for polyps, detecting only 1/2 of polyps found at histopathology
• False-positive rate of up to 30%, with positive predictive value of only 10% (compared to histopathology)

image Poor accuracy rates for polyps < 5 mm
image Potentially due to stones, GB folds, sludge, or cholesterolosis mimicking polyps
image Roughly 10% of polyps disappear on follow-up ultrasounds

– Original polyp may have been spurious, but could also reflect polyps breaking off or resolution of inflammatory polyps
• Immobile echogenic mucosal excrescence/nodule, either sessile or lobulated

image No acoustic shadowing, unlike stones
image Highly echogenic foci or “comet tail” artifacts within polyp suggests a cholesterol polyp
image Large polyps may show internal vascularity on color Doppler US
image No clear sonographic features to differentiate benign and malignant polyps

– Questionable link between sessile morphology and malignancy
– Multiple nodules more likely to be benign (usually cholesterol polyps); neoplastic polyps often solitary
• EUS has been shown to have higher accuracy in differentiation of benign (97%) vs. malignant (76%) polyps

Buy Membership for Radiology Category to continue reading. Learn more here