FUNGAL INFECTIONS AND ANTIFUNGAL THERAPY IN THE SURGICAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT

Published on 20/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Critical Care Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1234 times

CHAPTER 98 FUNGAL INFECTIONS AND ANTIFUNGAL THERAPY IN THE SURGICAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT

The first clinical description of Candida infection can be traced to Hippocrates, with Parrot recognizing a link to severe illness. Langenbeck implicated fungus as a source of infection, and Berg established causality between this organism and thrush by inoculating healthy babies with aphthous “membrane material.” The first description of a deep infection caused by Candida albicans was made by Zenker in 1861, even though it was not named until 1923 by Berkout. On the other hand, the genus Aspergillus was first described in 1729 by Michaeli, and the first human cases of aspergillosis were described in the mid-1800s.

Invasive mycoses have emerged as a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized surgical patients. It is estimated that the incidence of nosocomial candidemia in the United States is about 8 per 100,000 inhabitants. Excess attributable health care costs are approximately $1 billion per year. Average medical costs per episode of candidemia have been estimated at $34,123 for Medicare patients and $44,536 for privately insured patients. In the United States, Candida is the fourth most common cause of catheter-related infection. A recent prospective, observational study reported the incidence of fungemia in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) to be nearly 10 cases per 1000 admissions with an unadjusted mortality rate of 25%–50%.

Fungemia is the fourth most common type of bloodstream infection in the United States. Outside the United States, several studies have reported a rise in candidemia and other forms of Candida infections. In Canada, there has been an increase in the number of Candida isolates since 1991, where currently it constitutes 6% of all blood isolates. In general, the rates reported from European hospitals are slightly less than those from North America. In a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials with fluconazole prophylaxis, the incidence of fungal infections was significantly reduced; however, there was no survival advantage, raising the issue of the value of prophylaxis.

With the introduction of antibiotics and the subsequent appearance of intensive care units (ICUs), new examples of opportunistic fungal infections have emerged. The use of immunosuppression, organ transplantation, implantable devices, and human immunodeficiency virus infection has also radically changed the spectrum of fungal pathogenicity.

Fungi are ubiquitous heterotrophic eukaryotes, quite resilient to environmental stress and able to thrive in numerous environments. They may belong to the Chromista or Eumycota kingdom.1 For identification purposes, the separation of taxa is based on the method of spore production, assisted by molecular biology techniques (rRNA and rDNA) that further refine fungal phylogeny and establish new relationships between groups. The most important human pathogens are the yeasts and the molds (from the Norse mowlde, meaning fuzzy). The dual modality of fungal propagation (sexual/teleomorph and asexual/anamorph states) has meant that since the last century there has been a dual nomenclature.

PREDICTORS OF FUNGAL INFECTIONS

The National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance program (NNIS) of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has reported that whereas the rate of hospital-acquired fungal infections nearly doubled in the past decade compared with the previous decade, the greatest increase occurred in critically ill surgical patients, making the surgical population in the ICU an extremely high risk group.2 Several conditions (both patient-dependent and disease-specific) have been recognized as independent predictors for invasive fungal complications during critical illness. ICU length of stay was associated with Candida infection as were the degrees of morbidity, alterations of immune response, and the number of medical devices involved. Neutropenia, diabetes mellitus, newonset hemodialysis, total parenteral nutrition, broad-spectrum antibiotic administration, bladder catheterization, azotemia, diarrhea, use of corticosteroids, and cytotoxic drug utilization are also associated with candidemia.25

Organ Transplantation and Immunosuppression

The two most common opportunistic fungal infections in transplant patients are caused by Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., generally by the inhalation route (Aspergillus) or from gastrointestinal sources (Candida). Interestingly, the risk of fungal infection decreases six months after transplantation, unless a rejection episode requires intensification of the immunosuppression. In the solid organ transplant recipient, the graft itself is often affected. In liver transplantation, the risk of fungemia increases with the duration of the surgery and the number of transfusions. Other risk factors include the type of bile duct anastomosis (Roux-en-Y), the presence of tissue ischemia, infection with cytomegalovirus (CMV), and graft-versus-host disease. The most common place of occurrence for Aspergillus tracheobronchitis in lung transplant patients is at the bronchial anastomosis. Anastomotic colonization is both a risk factor for subsequent disruption or hemorrhage and a predictor for rejection and diminished graft survival. Surveillance bronchoscopies are recommended in this setting. Aspergillus is also the main organism responsible for fungemia after heart transplantation, and second only to CMV as the cause of pneumonia in the first month after operation.

Infectious complications are the main cause of morbidity and mortality in pancreas and kidney–pancreas transplantation. The most common organisms are gram-positive cocci, closely followed by gram-negative bacilli and Candida. Risk factors for fungal infections include bladder drainage (in cases of pancreas transplantation) and use of OKT-3 for rejection treatment. Kidney recipients, of all solid organ transplant recipients, have the lowest incidence of infectious complications. However, the risk is sufficiently high that all solid organ transplant recipients (kidney recipients included) receive fungal prophylaxis with fluconazole.

Long-Term Use of Central Venous Catheters

Numerous studies have shown that many, if not most, episodes of candidemia are catheter-related; one of the largest prospective treatment studies of fungemia implicated a catheter 72% of the time. The isolation of C. parapsilosis from blood cultures is strongly associated with central venous catheter infection, parenteral nutrition, or prosthetic devices. The source of the fungal contaminants is different in neutropenic patients when compared with their non-neutropenic counterparts. In non-neutropenic subjects the most common portals of entry for catheter contamination (and subsequent infection) is the skin during catheter placement, manipulation of an indwelling catheter, and crossinfection among ICU patients attributed to hand carriage of microbial flora from health care workers. Other possible sources for primary catheter colonization include contaminated parenteral nutrition solution, multiple medication administration with repetitive violation of the sterile fluid path, and the presence of other medical devices. The secondary route of contamination for intravascular catheters and other foreign bodies in direct contact with the bloodstream (e.g., pacemakers, cardiac valves, orthopedic joint prostheses) is candidemia originating via translocation from the gastrointestinal tract. Endogenous flora are also the most common source in neutropenic and other immunosuppressed patients. Once the catheter becomes contaminated, a well-studied series of events takes place: The yeast adheres to the surface of the catheter and develops hyphal forms that integrate into a matrix of polysaccharides and proteins (biofilm) that increases in size and tridimensional complexity. This biofilm is the main reservoir for candidemia secondary to contaminated medical devices, as it sequesters the fungi from antimycotic medication and against the protective immune response.

In general, the removal of all central venous catheters is indicated following the diagnosis of systemic fungal infections and fungemia. Removal may not be necessary in neutropenic patients in whom the fungi originated from the GI tract. Antifungals in general are continued after the catheter is removed, and it is recommended that Candida ocular dissemination be ruled out (see following discussion of endophthalmitis).

Use of Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics

The use of broad-spectrum antibiotics is one of the bestdocumented risk factors for fungal overgrowth and invasive infections, but the precise mechanism is not understood completely. In evaluating the effect of antibiotic use, one must consider first the complex interrelations between bacteria and fungi in human disease. At least three experimental models have been created to investigate and characterize possible interactions between bacterial and fungal pathogens. In murine models, ticarcillin-clavulanic acid and ceftriaxone (both of which have some antianaerobic therapy) are associated with substantial increases in colony counts of yeast flora of the gut. On the other hand, antibiotics with poor anaerobic activity are less likely to produce this effect (examples are ceftazidime and aztreonam). This observation was validated in a clinical review of the quantitative colonization of stool in immunocompromised patients treated with those antibiotics. However, this interaction between fungi overgrowth and anaerobic suppression is different from the well-studied model of Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis in intra-abdominal abscess formation. The work of Sawyer et al. showed that C. albicans induces bacterial translocation into abscesses, but the relationship is one of direct competency, rather than synergy or cooperation.7,8 This is different than the cooperation between C. albicans and Staphylococcus aureus, Serratia marcescens, and Enterococcus faecalis, where an amplification-type interaction has been documented. A number of immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive viruses have been shown to facilitate superinfections with opportunistic fungi, the most notable examples being CMV and human herpes virus (HHV)-6, because they induce the production of immunosuppressive cytokines. It seems that C. albicans thrives in situations where immunocompromise is present and adds virulence and mortality to existent bacterial infections in a species-specific manner. This hypothesis has been validated from clinical observations, where antifungal treatment adds little to the therapeutic effect of antibacterial agents alone. Thus, the use of antibiotics (three or more), especially those with anti-anaerobic properties, constitute a risk factor for fungal colonization and overgrowth, which in turn is a predictor for systemic fungal infections. The precise mechanism of action for this observation is unknown but is probably related to fungi-to-microbe competence and growth suppression. Candida may enhance the pathogenicity of certain bacteria, but not others, and this interaction remains to be elucidated.7

PATHOGENIC ORGANISMS

Candida albicans

The most common fungal pathogen both in the United States and abroad, and ranked among the most common sources of ICU sepsis, C. albicans is a common cause of human disease.9 Candida albicans accounts for 59% of Candida isolates, followed by C. glabrata (15%–25% of all Candida infections). Both colonization and invasive candidiasis can be focal or disseminated. Multifocal candidiasis is the simultaneous isolation of Candida from two or more of the following locations: respiratory, digestive, urinary, wounds, or drainage. Disseminated candidiasis is microbiological evidence of yeast in fluids from normally sterile sites such as cerebrospinal, pleural, pericardial, or peritoneal fluid, histologic samples from deep organs, or diagnosis of endophthalmitis or candidemia with negative catheter-tip cultures. The incidence of candidemia has increased over the past 30 years, with mortality rates reported in some series to be as high as 80%. The NNIS system of the CDC found Candida species responsible for 8%–15% of all nosocomial bloodstream infection episodes in the United States in 1993, which ranked fourth among commonly isolated pathogens in bloodstream infections.

It is well established that a morphological transition in C. albicans, from yeast to hyphal forms, is the most important determinant of dissemination, because the mycelial phase is invasive.10 Both host and pathogen play a role on this dimorphism. The fungus produces several proteins during the hyphal transition, which are currently the focus of research. The thiol-specific antioxidant, or TSA-1, has shown an increased survival capability in an antioxidant environment created by host cells. Host recognition molecules (adhesins), secreted aspartyl proteases and phospholipases, and phenotypic switching accompanied by changes in antigen expression, colony morphology, and tissue affinities are other recognized virulence factors. The inducer mechanisms and the multiple stimuli that trigger this change are unknown.

From the host side, the presence of the enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) has been linked to antifungal defense mechanisms, by blocking the morphological transition. The enzyme is induced in infectious sites and in dendritic cells by IFN-γ. Interferon serves in a pivotal position in immunity from C. albicans invasion. Other immune mechanisms blocking the transformation include salivary histidine, other gastrointestinal inhibitory peptides, and the resident population of dendritic cells. The dimorphic change produces disseminated candidiasis (also known as hepatosplenic candidiasis) and specific end-organ involvement in susceptible hosts. Of those metastatic infections, among the most devastating is fungal endophthalmitis.

Disseminated candidiasis and fungemia can lead to septic shock, similar to that seen with other microorganisms. The dimorphic transition generates shock and end-organ failure in susceptible individuals, and these events are independent of TNF-α. The diagnosis of fungemia as the cause of a patient’s sepsis depends on a strong clinical suspicion. Only 50% of blood cultures for invasive candidiasis are positive and bacterial pathogens may interfere with the recovery of Candida. There are no reliable laboratory tests to differentiate between Candida colonization and invasive candidiasis, and no single site of isolation is superior to others in predicting which patients are likely to have developed systemic infection. The diagnostic criteria for fungemia are a combination of positive tissue cultures (including burn excision cultures and peritoneal cultures), endophthalmitis, osteomyelitis, and candiduria. Purpura fulminans and unexplained myalgias are suggestive of candidiasis in the appropriate clinical context. The presence of three or more colonized sites or two positive blood cultures at least 24 hours apart, with one obtained after the removal of any central venous catheters are strong indicators of fungemia.10 Whereas asymptomatic recovery of Candida in urine rarely requires therapy, candiduria should be treated in symptomatic patients, neutropenic patients, renal transplant patients, and after instrumentation. The removal or at least changing of the Foley catheter is required.

Fungal endophthalmitis usually occurs as a result of hematogenous spread from systemic fungemia. Candida spp. are the most common offenders, although Aspergillus, Cryptococcus, Fusarium, Scedosporium, and others have been reported to lead to endophthalmitis. Retinal involvement has been diagnosed in 28%–45% of all known candidemic patients, and may actually be the first sign of clinically undetected fungemia. The early initiation of systemic treatment for deep tissue fungal infection appears to decrease dramatically the incidence of endogenous fungal endophthalmitis. It is mandatory for all individuals with systemic candidiasis and fungemia to have a formal ophthalmologic assessment to rule out eye involvement. The observation of a classic three-dimensional retina-based vitreal inflammatory process is virtually diagnostic of endogenous endophthalmitis due to Candida spp.

Treatment consists of aggressive intravenous antifungal therapy, and may require intraocular injections of amphotericin B, caspofungin, or voriconazole. In cases where extension to the vitreous or pars anterior are evident, surgical debridement or vitrectomy will be required. Delay in treatment leads frequently to blindness.

Non–albicans Candida

The incidence of non-Candida fungemia and sepsis syndrome has been increasing in recent years, accounting for up to one-half of non–albicans Candida adult ICU infections. The reasons for this are likely multifactorial. Undoubtedly, one explanation for the emergence of C. glabrata and C. krusei is the selection of less-susceptible species by the pressure of antifungal agents.11 Other species of yeast are related to specific events, such as the presence of an indwelling central venous catheter and C. parapsilosis. The increased incidence of C. tropicalis in oncology patients is secondary to the increased invasiveness of the organism, especially in damaged gastrointestinal mucosa. The clinical features of this infection are indistinguishable from C. albicans.

Aspergillus

The noninvasive types of aspergillosis include allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (a form of hypersensitivity reaction in asthmatics) and aspergilloma. These entities, without tissue invasion, usually do not require antifungal therapy. Invasive aspergillosis has experienced an increased incidence over the last decade, and has become a major cause of death among patients with liquid tumors. Although invasive Aspergillus infections usually occur via inhalation of conidia, the fungus is also frequently present on food (i.e., pepper, regular and herbal tea bags, fruits, corn, and rice). The thermotolerant spores of Aspergillus and other fungi present are difficult to eradicate, and represent a threat to the immunocompromised host. Conidia that fail to be cleared by alveolar macrophages germinate in the alveolar space, and hyphal forms invade the pulmonary parenchyma, with prominent vascular invasion and early dissemination (Figures 1 through 3).12

image

Figure 1 Chest x-ray of a patient with disseminated Aspergillus infection and pneumonia. The image is identical to that of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

(Courtesy of Smith-Singares E, Barie PS, Eachempati SR: The Anne and Max A. Cohen Surgical Intensive Care Unit, New York-Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical College.)

image

Figure 2 Microphotograph of invasive Aspergillus infection in the lungs of the patient in Figure 1.

(Courtesy Minick CR, Loyd E, Amin B: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical College.)

image

Figure 3 Purpura fulminans in a victim of hepatosplenic candidiasis.

(Courtesy Minick CR, Loyd E, Amin B: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical College.)

PRINCIPLES OF THERAPY

The past 10 years has seen a major expansion in the repertoire of antifungal agents with the introduction of less-toxic formulations of amphotericin B, improved triazoles, echinocandins, and other agents that target the fungal cell wall. As described by Flanagan and Barnes, therapy for fungal infections in the ICU can be directed using four different strategies: prophylactic, preemptive, empiric, and definitive. Some data suggest a decrease in invasive fungal infections with prophylactic antifungal therapy in non-neutropenic critically ill surgical patients with Candida isolates from sites other than blood and the presence of risk factors mentioned previously. Others have suggested that use of antifungal prophylaxis in unselected SICU patients increases mortality, length of stay, and the appearance of resistance in previously susceptible fungi, not to mention the increase in cost this approach generates.13 Prophylactic fluconazole treatment in the SICU leads to secondary mycoses, with up to 80% of the pathogens resistant to fluconazole.14,15 Tables 1 and 2 and Figures 4 and 5 show one schema used in the SICU at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center. Independent of the species, infection by fluconazole-resistant Candida doubles the mortality rate. The colonization index developed by Pittet et al. and Ostrosky-Zeichner suggests that high-risk patients are those who remain in the ICU for 4 days or more and who either have a central venous catheter in place or are treated with antibiotics in addition to two of the following: use of total parenteral nutrition, need for dialysis, recent major surgery, diagnosis of pancreatitis, and treatment with systemic corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive agents.15,16 Studies have documented the lack of benefit for fluconazole prophylaxis in unselected trauma patients, and in ICU patients, for whom the contribution of mortality by candidemia is surpassed by that of age and severity of illness.17,18

Table 3 presents a list of available antifungal agents. Amphotericin B is a natural polyene macrolide that binds primarily to ergosterol, the principal sterol in the fungal cell membrane, leading to disruption of ion channels, production of oxygen free radicals, and apoptosis. It is active against most fungi, including in cerebrospinal fluid. Due to its high level of protein binding, tissue concentrations are not usually affected by hemodialysis. Infusion-related reactions can occur in up to 73% of patients with the first dose and often diminish during continued therapy. Amphotericin B–associated nephrotoxicity can lead to azotemia and hypokalemia, although acute potassium release with rapid infusion can occur and lead to cardiac arrest. Amphotericin B lipid formulations allow for higher dose administration with lessened nephrotoxicity, but whether outcomes are enhanced is unproved. Nystatin is a polyene similar in structure to amphotericin B, and is currently used topically for C. albicans. A parenteral formulation is under investigation. Flucytosine is a fluorinated pyrimidine analog that is converted to 5-fluorouracil, which causes RNA miscoding and inhibits DNA synthesis. It is available in the United States in oral form only and has been used with amphotericin B for synergism against Candida spp.

Table 3 Antifungal Agents

Antifungal Agent Indications Routes/Dosage
Amphotericin B

Amphotericin B liposomal (less nephrotoxicity) IV: 3–5 mg/kg/day Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (more infusional) IV: 3–4 mg/kg/day Amphotericin B Lipid Complex IV: 5 mg/kg/day Ketoconazole C. albicans PO: 200–400 mg/daily Voriconazole Fluconazole Candidiasis:

Itraconazole Caspofungin C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, C. krusei, C. guillermondi, C. lusitaniae IV: 70 mg IV, then 50 mg IV every day Flucytosine PO: 50–150 mg/kg/day divided QID Nystatin C. albicans 100,000 units swish and swallow QID Clotrimazole Thrush Oral troches 5× daily × 14 days

The azoles inhibit the cytochrome P450–dependent enzyme, 14-alpha reductase, altering fungal cell membranes through accumulation of abnormal 14-alphamethyl sterols. Ketoconazole comes only in tablet form and is indicated for candidiasis and candiduria. Fluconazole and itraconazole are available in oral and parenteral formulations and are active against Candida spp. except C. krusei, and Fusarium spp. Itraconazole is active against Aspergillus spp. As mentioned previously, C. glabrata and C. krusei resistance has been seen with fluconazole. The tissue concentration of both drugs is influenced by many agents such as antacids, H2-antagonists, isoniazid, phenytoin, and phenobarbitol.

Second-generation antifungal triazoles include posaconazole, ravuconazole, and voriconazole. They are active against Candida spp., including fluconazole-resistant strains, and Aspergillus spp. For the latter, voriconazole is emerging as the treatment of choice.19,20

The echinocandins include caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin, each of which is approved therapy for candidiasis and candidemia, but third-line treatment for invasive aspergillosis. Due to their distinct mechanism of action, disrupting the fungal cell wall by inhibiting β(1,3)-D-glucan synthesis, the echinocandins can theoretically be used in combination with other standard antifungal agents. The echinocandins have activity against Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., but are not reliably active against other fungi. Echinocandin activity is excellent against most Candida spp., but moderate against C. parapsilosis, C. guillermondi, and C. lusitaniae. Echinocandins exhibit no cross-resistance with azoles or polyenes.21

Invasive fungal infections in non-neutropenic ICU patients are treated if histology or cytopathology show yeast cells or pseudohyphae from a needle aspiration or biopsy (excluding mucous membranes), a positive culture obtained aseptically from a normally sterile and clinically or radiologically abnormal site consistent with infection (excluding urine, sinuses, and mucous membranes), or positive percutaneous blood culture in patients with temporally related clinical signs and symptoms compatible with the relevant organism.

REFERENCES

1 Guarro J, Gene J, Stchigel AM, et al. Developments in fungal taxonomy. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12:454-500.

2 Vincent JL, Anaissie E, Bruining H, et al. Epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of systemic Candida infections in surgical patients under intensive care. Intensive Care Med. 1998;24:206-216.

3 Cornwell EE, Belzberg H, Berne TV, et al. The pattern of fungal infections in critically ill surgical patients. Am Surg. 1995;61:847-850.

4 Blumberg HM, Jarvis WR, Soucie JM, et al. Risk factors for candidal bloodstream infections in surgical intensive care unit patients: the NEMIS prospective multicenter study. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:177-186.

5 Paphitou NI, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Rex JH. Rules for identifying patients at increased risk for candidal infections in the surgical intensive care unit: approach to developing practical criteria for systematic use in antifungal prophylaxis trials. Med Mycol. 2005;43:235-243.

6 Piarroux R, Grenouillet F, Balvay P, et al. Assessment of preemptive treatment to prevent severe candidiasis in critically ill surgical patients. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:2443-2449.

7 Holzheimer RG, Dralle H. Management of mycoses in surgical patients: review of the literature. Eur J Med Res. 2002;7:200-226.

8 Sawyer RG, Adams RB, May AK, et al. Development of candida albicans and C. albicans/escherichia coli/bacteroides fragilis intraperitoneal abscess models with demonstration of fungus-induced bacterial translocation. J Med Vet Mycol. 1995;33:49-52.

9 Lipsett PA. Clinical trials of antifungal prophylaxis among patients in surgical intensive care units: concepts and considerations. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:S193-S199.

10 Dean DA, Burchard KW. Surgical perspective on invasive Candida infections. World J Surg. 1998;22:127-134.

11 P Eggimann, J Garbino & D Pittet Epidemiology of Candida species infections in critically ill non-immunosuppressed patients. Lancet Infect Dis 3: 685–702

12 Meersseman W, Vandecasteele SJ, Wilmer A, et al. Invasive aspergillosis in critically ill patients without malignancy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170:621-625.

13 Rocco TR, Reinert SE, Simms HH. Effects of fluconazole administration in critically ill patients: analysis of bacterial and fungal resistance. Arch Surg. 2000;135:160-165.

14 Gleason TG, May AK, Caparelli D, et al. Emerging evidence of selection of fluconazole-tolerant fungi in surgical intensive care units. Arch Surg. 1997;132:1197-1201.

15 Shorr AF, Chung K, Jackson WL, et al. Fluconazole prophylaxis in critically ill surgical patients: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:1928-1935.

16 Ostrosky-Zeichner L. New approaches to the risk of Candida in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2003;16:533-537.

17 Groll AH, Gea-Banacloche JC, Glasmacher A, et al. Clinical pharmacology of antifungal compounds. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2003;17:159-191.

18 Rex JH, Walsh TJ, Sobel JD, et al. Practice guidelines for the treatment of candidiasis. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30:662-678.

19 Herbrecht R, Denning DW, Patterson TF, et al. Vooriconazole versus amphotericin B for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:408-415.

20 Kullberg BJ, Sobel JD, Ruhnke M, et al. Voriconazole versus a regimen of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole for candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2005;366:1435-1442.

21 Anidulafung in. Med Lett Drugs Ther. 2006;48:43-44.

22 Cochran A, Morris SE, Edelman LS, et al. Systemic Candida infection in burn patients: a case-control study of management patterns and outcomes. Surg Infect. 2002;4:367-374.