Fungal infections

Published on 02/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Basic Science

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1264 times

42 Fungal infections

Fungi are ubiquitous microorganisms that differ from bacteria in their cellular structure, and this makes them naturally resistant to antibacterial agents (Table 42.1). Fungi are broadly divided into yeasts and moulds. Yeasts are typically round or oval shaped microscopically, grow flat round colonies on culture plates and reproduce by forming buds from their cells. Moulds (e.g. Aspergillus, Mucor) appear as a collection or mass (mycelium) of individual tubular structures called hyphae that grow by branching and longitudinal extension. They appear as a fuzzy growth on appropriate conducive medium (e.g. Penicillium colonies on stale bread or Sabourauds agar). The most commonly seen yeast, Candida, occasionally produces pseudohyphae.

Table 42.1 Important characteristics of a fungal cell

Fungi Bacteria
Eukaryotes Prokaryotes, eubacteria
Cell and cytoplasm Cell and cytoplasm
Nucleus with multiple chromosomes enclosed in a nuclear membrane No nucleus or nuclear membrane, has single chromosome
Contains endoplasmic reticulum, golgi apparatus, mitochondria and ribosomes Other structures absent except ribosomes
Cytoplasmic membrane Cytoplasmic membrane
Contains phospholipids and sterols Contains phospholipids and no sterols
Cell wall Cell wall
Contains chitins, mannans,+/- cellulose Contains peptidoglycan, lipids and proteins

There are hundreds of species of fungi found in the environment, but only the important human fungal pathogens and their treatment will be discussed in this chapter. The fungi of medical importance can be divided into four groups (Table 42.2).

Table 42.2 Classification of fungi of medical importance

Group Examples Infections caused
Yeast Candida spp. Oral and vaginal thrush
Deep seated: candidaemia, empyema
Cryptococcus neoformans Meningitis
Saccharomyces cervesiae Rare systemic infection in immunocompromised host
Malassezia furfur
Yeast-like Geotrichium candidium  
Trichosporon beigelii
Dimorphic fungi Blastomyces dermatitidis For first three: deep systemic organ involvement, more commonly in the immunocompromised host
Coccidioides immitis Deep subcutaneous infection following trauma
Histoplasma capsulatum
Paracoccidioides brasiliensis
Sporothrix schenckii
Moulds
1. Hyaline    
a. Zygomyces Rhizopus Infections in neutropenic patients and those with diabetic ketoacidosis
Mucor
Absidia
b. Hyalohyphomycosis Aspergillus fumigatus and other Aspergillus spp. Systemic infection: invasive pulmonary or central nervous system involvement
Fusarium Fusarium keratitis
Scedosporium apiospermum Deep infection in immunocompromised host, for example, transplant patients
2. Dermatophytes Trichophyton spp. For all three: various skin (ringworm) hair and nail infections
Microsporum spp.
Epidermophyton
3. Dematiaceous Alternaria spp. Deep tissue infection with granulomas
Cladophialora spp. Chromomycosis, mycetomas

Some fungi like Histoplasma capsulatum, Coccidioides immitis, Blastomyces dermatitidis are known as dimorphic fungi (Table 42.2) because they are found in the infected host in yeast form at 35–37 °C temperature but grow as moulds, in vitro, at room temperatures (22 °C incubation).

Fungi mainly reproduce by forming spores through mitosis giving rise to two daughter cells. They are known by names given to this imperfect state (asexual reproduction), but the same fungus, for example, Scedosporium apiospermum (asexual form) is also known as Pseudoallescheria boydii (sexual form). However, for all practical purposes, only the oldest and best-established name for the fungi is used in diagnostic laboratories.

Fungal spore are spread by air, water and direct contact with infected source. Humans usually become infected by inhalation of airborne spores or by inoculation into traumatised skin and mucous membrane.

Laboratory diagnosis

Microscopical examination and culture of fungi is the mainstay of laboratory diagnosis. Appropriate staining of histological sections of affected tissue is helpful in making a diagnosis when culture growth may or may not be positive. Yeast colonies and moulds are characteristic in their appearance on culture plates and can be preliminarily identified by their shape, colour and temperatures at which they grow. For the genus and species identification of yeasts, microscopic examination and biochemical tests are necessary. Moulds are identified by their morphology and the nature of sporulation on agar medium.

Antifungal sensitivity testing for yeast is done by determining the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the antifungal agent in the E test® strip method which has now replaced the measurement of ‘inhibition zone’ by disc testing. E-test® strips are also available for determining sensitivity of antifungal agents against moulds. Molecular diagnosis utilising polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is not available for use in routine practice. Serological diagnosis to look for antibodies in patient’s blood is of use only in Coccidioides infection. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods to look for galactomannan antigen in deep Aspergillus infection are available but not fully evaluated. A positive test needs to be interpreted in conjunction with other findings. Antigen detection is useful in disseminated Histoplasmosis and Cryptococcosis.

Antifungal agents

Topical and systemic antifungal agents are available to treat mucocutaneous candidiasis, various forms of tinea (ringworm) and other dermatophytosis, onychomycosis and deep-seated systemic infections (e.g. candidaemia, mucor mycoses, fungal endocarditis, osteomyelitis). Some infective conditions and their treatment are dealt with in the sections that follow. The side effects of a range of antifungal agents are set out in Table 42.3.

Table 42.3 Side effects of antifungal agents

Drug Side effects
Griseofulvin Mild: headache, gastro-intestinal side effects. Hypersensitivity reactions such as skin rashes, including photosensitivity
Moderate: exacerbation of acute intermittent porphyria; rarely, precipitation of systemic lupus erythematosus. Contraindicated in both acute porphyria, systemic lupus erythematosus, pregnancy and severe liver disease
Terbinafine Usually mild: nausea, abdominal pain; allergic skin reactions; loss and disturbance of sense of taste. Not recommended in patients with liver disease
Amphotericin Immediate reactions (during infusion) include headache, pyrexia, rigors, nausea, vomiting, hypotension; occasionally, there can be severe thrombophlebitis after the infusion
Nephrotoxicity and hypokalaemia
Anaemia due to reduced erythropoiesis
Peripheral neuropathy (rare)
Cardiac failure (exacerbated by hypokalaemia due to nephrotoxicity)
Immunomodulation (the drug can both enhance and inhibit some immunological functions)
Flucytosine Mild: gastro-intestinal side effects (nausea, vomiting). Occasional skin rashes
Moderate: myelosuppression (dose related), hepatotoxicity
Fluconazole Mild: nausea, vomiting and occasional skin rashes; occasionally, elevated liver enzymes (reversible)
Moderate or severe: rarely, hepatotoxicity and severe cutaneous reactions, especially in AIDS patients
Itraconazole Mild: nausea and abdominal pain; occasional skin rashes
Moderate or severe: rarely, hepatotoxicity
Voriconazole Similar to fluconazole and itraconazole
Mild: reversible visual disturbances occur in about 30% patients
Caspofungin Mild: gastro-intestinal side effects; occasional skin rashes

Superficial infection

Candida infections

Treatment

Oral and vaginal candidiasis may be treated by either topical or systemic antifungal agents. The drugs currently available for topical use fall into two groups: the polyenes, of which only amphotericin and nystatin are used clinically, and the imidazoles such as econazole, clotrimazole, miconazole and fenticonazole. These agents are essentially identical in their antifungal activity and the only reasons to choose between them are price and differing preparations. The two systemic agents are both triazoles (fluconazole and itraconazole) and can be given by mouth. Skin infections may also be treated topically, but nail infections are unlikely to respond to a topical antifungal agent alone and require systemic treatment. Oesophagitis will invariably require systemic treatment.

Systemic treatment

Three triazole agents: fluconazole, itraconazole and voriconazole are available for systemic treatment of oral and vulvo vaginal candidiasis (VVC). A good source of advice on treatment is that from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (Pappas et al., 2009):

Vulvo vaginal candidiasis

Candida balanitis

It is sometimes stated that when treating a woman with vaginal candidiasis, the male partner should be treated simultaneously to prevent reinfection. Although there is no evidence to support this approach, it may be considered in women who suffer from repeated vaginal candidiasis.

Guidance on the treatment of topical and systemic therapy (Pappas et al., 2009) are also available for treatment of mild, moderate and severe oropharyngeal and oesophageal candidiasis and suppressive therapy for patients with HIV infection.

Dermatophytosis

Treatment

Small or medium areas of skin infection can be treated with topical therapy, but nail, hair and widespread skin infection should be systemically treated with oral antifungal agents.

The most commonly used topical agents are the imidazoles, of which a wide variety is available, including clotrimazole, ecoazole, miconazole, sulconazole and tioconazole. There is little to choose between these agents, all of which are usually applied two or three times daily, continuing for up to 2 weeks after the lesions have healed. Side effects are uncommon and usually consist of mild skin irritation. Other topical agents include amorolfine, terbinafine and tolnaftate.

The main oral antifungals used for dermatophytosis are terbinafine, itraconazole and fluconazole. Griseofulvin is an alternative treatment for tinea capitis.

Griseofulvin

The first orally administered treatment for dermatophytosis was griseofulvin, which has now been available for over 40 years. Griseofulvin is active only against dermatophyte fungi and is inactive against all other fungi and bacteria. In order to exert its antifungal effect, it must be incorporated into keratinous tissue, where levels are much greater than serum levels, and therefore it has no effect if used topically.

The usual adult dose is 10–20 mg/kg/day for 6 weeks for treatment of larger lesions in tinea corporis.

Griseofulvin is well absorbed and absorption is enhanced if taken with a high-fat meal. In children, it may be given with milk. A 1000-mg dose produces a peak serum level of about 1–2 mg/L after 4 h, with a half-life of at least 9 h. An ultra-fine preparation of griseofulvin exists which is almost totally absorbed and permits the use of lower doses (typically 330–660 mg daily). This preparation is not available in the UK. Elimination is mainly through the liver and inactive metabolites are excreted in the urine. Less than 1% of a dose is excreted in urine in the active form, but some active drug is excreted in the faeces.

The duration of treatment with griseofulvin is dependent entirely on clinical response. Skin or hair infection usually requires 4–12 weeks’ therapy, but nail infections respond much more slowly; 6 months’ treatment is often required for fingernails, a year or more for toenail infections. Unfortunately, the rate of treatment failure or relapse in nail infection is high, and may reach up to 60%. Hence, terbinafine and itraconazole may be preferred agents.

Pityriasis versicolor

This is a common superficial skin infection caused by a yeast-like fungus, Malassezia furfur. The organism is a member of the normal skin flora and lives only on the skin because it has a growth requirement for medium-chain fatty acids present in sebum.

Fungal infections in the compromised host

Common mycoses

Epidemiology and predisposing factors

There are a large number of conditions which may predispose the individual to systemic or deep-seated fungal infection. These are summarised in Table 42.4. A breach in the body’s mechanical barriers may predispose to fungal infection. For example, fungal infection of the urinary tract occurs most commonly in catheterised patients who have received broad-spectrum antibiotics, while total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is strongly associated with fungaemia, sometimes with unusual fungi such as Malassezia furfur. This is due to the use of TPN infusions containing lipids, which are a growth requirement of this organism. Most cases of systemic fungal infection, however, are associated with a defect in the patient’s immune system, and the nature of the organisms encountered is often related to the nature of the immunosuppression. Neutropenia, for example, is usually associated with Candida species, Aspergillus and mucormycosis, while defects of cell-mediated immunity, for example HIV infection, are strongly associated with infection by Cryptococcus neoformans. Prolonged diabetic ketoacidosis is a risk factor for developing rhinocerebral zygomycosis where mortality can be as high as 100% if there is significant underlying disease.

Table 42.4 Conditions predisposing to systemic or deep-seated fungal infection

Infection Predisposing conditions
Systemic candidiasis Neutropenia from any cause (disease or treatment)
Use of broad-spectrum antibiotics which eliminate the normal body flora
Indwelling intravenous cannulae, especially when used for total parenteral nutrition
Haematological malignancy and HSCT
Solid organ transplantation
AIDS (particularly associated with severe mucocutaneous infection)
Intravenous drug abuse
Cardiac surgery and heart valve replacement, leading to Candida endocarditis
Gastro-intestinal tract surgery
Oesophagectomy leak leading to pleural space infection (empyema)
Aspergillosis Neutropenia from any cause, especially if severe and prolonged
Acute leukaemia
Solid organ transplantation (mainly lungs)
Chronic granulomatous disease of childhood (defect in neutrophil function)
Pre-existing lung disease (usually leads to aspergillomas; fungus balls form in the lung rather than invasive or disseminated infection)
Cryptococcosis AIDS
Systemic therapy with corticosteroids
Renal transplantation
Hodgkin’s disease and other lymphomas
Sarcoidosis
Collagen vascular diseases
Zygomycosis Diabetic hyperglycaemic ketoacidosis (leading to rhinocerebral infection)
Severe, prolonged neutropenia
Burns (leading to cutaneous infection)

HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Many different fungi have been described as causing systemic fungal infection, but the most common organisms encountered and the conditions they cause are listed in Table 42.5. Of these, Candida and Aspergillus are by far the most common in the UK.

Table 42.5 Common causes of systemic and deep-seated fungal infection in the UK

Condition/organism Common clinical presentations
Candidiasis (Candida albicans, C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. tropicalis, other Candida species) Fungaemia
Colonisation of intravenous cannulae
Pneumonia
Meningitis
Bone and joint infections
Endocarditis
Endophthalmitis
Peritonitis in chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis
Aspergillosis (Aspergillus fumigatus, A. flavus, other Aspergillus species) Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis
Disseminated aspergillosis
Aspergilloma
Endocarditis
Cryptococcosis (Cryptococcus neoformans) Meningitis
Pneumonia
Cutaneous infection
Zygomycosis (various species of the genera Rhizopus, Mucor, Absidia) Rhinocerebral infection
Pulmonary mucormycosis
Surgical wound and burns infection
Malassezia furfur Cutaneous infection (especially in burns patients)
Fungaemia associated with total parenteral nutrition

Clinical presentation

Symptoms can be non-specific like low-grade fever, night sweats, weight loss, cough, chest pain and septic shock in extreme cases (Table 42.6).

Table 42.6 Clinical presentation of systemic fungal infection

Condition Clinical presentation
Fungaemia (the presence of fungi in the bloodstream), usually due to Candida species Fever, low blood pressure and sometimes other features of septic shock, especially in neutropenic patients
Relatively low-grade fungaemias such as those associated with colonised intravenous cannulae often present only with fever
Disseminated infection to multiple organ systems is quite common with Candida species, leading to central nervous system disease, endocarditis, endophthalmitis, skin infections, renal disease, bone and joint infection
Pneumonia, most frequently due to Aspergillus species Fever, chest pain and cough which may be non-productive. May progress rapidly, especially with Aspergillus infection, to severe respiratory distress, necrosis of the lung and pulmonary haemorrhage
Formation of fungal balls in pre-existing lung cavities with or without invasion
Meningitis and other central nervous system infection Candida infection may present as a typical meningitis, although it is often more insidious.
Aspergillosis is associated with headache, confusion and focal neurological signs due to the presence of brain infarcts. Cryptococcosis most frequently presents as a chronic, insidious meningitis with headache and alteration in mental state
Mucormycosis Angioinvasive. The most common presentation of mucormycosis is rhinocerebral infection.
Initially an infection of the sinuses, it then spreads locally to the palate, orbit and eventually into the brain, leading to encephalitis
Pulmonary disease can present as fungal balls radiologically with symptoms of haemoptysis

Amphotericin B

Amphotericin, a member of the polyene group, is obtained from various species of Streptomyces. Chemically, it is a large carbon ring of 37 carbon atoms closed by a lactone bond. One side of the molecule contains seven carbon- to-carbon double bonds (polyene) and the other side contains seven hydroxyl groups. It dissolves in organic polar solvents but forms a colloidal suspension of micelles in water which is rendered stable by the addition of the surfactant sodium deoxycholate.

Amphotericin B deoxycholate (ABD)

Released in 1950, colloidal in nature, amphotericin B deoxycholate is highly protein bound (99%) and insoluble in water. It penetrates poorly into cerebrospinal fluid. Initial elimination of the drug occurs with a half-life of 24–48 h, but this is followed by very slow elimination (half-life about 14 days). As a consequence, it may take 10 weeks for the drug to disappear from the circulation.

Amphotericin B deoxycholate is given by slow IV infusion in 5% dextrose with a dose range of 0.3–1 mg/kg increased to 1.5 mg/kg for serious invasive infections. The duration of treatment can vary from 1 to 2 weeks to longer, depending on the severity of the infection and the organ system involved.

Amphotericin B lipid formulations

The advantage of delivering amphotericin encapsulated in liposomes or as a complex with lipid molecules is that a higher unit dose can be given and there is reduction in toxic effects. Three such preparations are currently available: liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome®), amphotericin B lipid complex (Abelcept®) and amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (Amphocil®).

Liposomal amphotericin B

In liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome®), the drug is contained in small vesicles each consisting of a phospholipid bilayer enclosing an aqueous environment. This permits the delivery of higher doses (3 mg/kg is recommended, but doses up to 10 mg/kg have been used in some centres) compared to conventional amphotericin, with very little of the immediate toxicity which is such a problem with the conventional formulation. Higher peak serum concentrations are obtained with the liposomal formulation compared to equivalent doses of the conventional drug, although it is not certain if this is clinically relevant. Liposomal amphotericin is concentrated mainly in the liver and spleen, where it is taken up by cells of the reticuloendothelial system. Concentrations in the lung and kidneys are much lower, which may or may not be clinically important.

There is reduced nephrotoxicity with this formulation, and some of the renal dysfunction which has been described in clinical trials of liposomal amphotericin may have been due to concomitant drugs. Three randomised, comparative clinical trials of liposomal amphotericin versus conventional amphotericin B have shown reduced toxicity due to the liposomal preparation, and there is additional evidence for this from open studies. It is this comparative lack of toxicity which accounts for much of the popularity of this agent, despite its expense. These studies also indicate that this agent performs as well as the conventional preparation in febrile neutropenic patients.

Flucytosine

Amphotericin B and griseofulvin were the only systemic antifungal agents available until the early 1970s, when flucytosine became available for patient use.

Side effects

Some of the side effects of flucytosine are given in Table 42.3. The most important toxic effect is a dose-related myelosuppression with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. This is usually reversible and can be avoided by monitoring serum levels of flucytosine and adjusting the dose accordingly. Hepatotoxicity is also probably a result of high serum levels, and liver function tests should be performed regularly. The drug is teratogenic in some animals and is not recommended in pregnant women for relatively trivial infections such as a fungal urinary tract infection. In cases of a life-threatening fungal infection, which is very rare in pregnancy, the potential benefits of flucytosine must be weighed against the possible risks.

Fluconazole

Clinical use

Fluconazole is available both orally and parenterally and is used only in the treatment and prophylaxis of infections due to yeasts and yeast-like fungi. It is not used for the treatment of infections due to moulds. It is highly effective in the treatment of Cryptococcus infection, but the first-line treatment of cryptococcosis of the central nervous system is the combination of amphotericin B plus flucytosine for CNS infection due to this organism. This may be followed by fluconazole, which in HIV-infected patients will be required life long as suppressive treatment to prevent relapse. In immunocompetent hosts, fluconazole may be used as the primary treatment for disease not involving the CNS, such as pulmonary infection.

In patients with candidaemia due to colonised intravenous cannulae, the most important treatment is removal of the infected cannula, but it is common practice to give a short course of antifungal therapy to prevent disseminated infection elsewhere. Although not proven in randomised clinical trials, changing potentially infected central-line catheters in candidaemia patients is probably the most important part of therapy.

In non-neutropenic patients, studies have shown fluconazole and caspofungin to be as efficacious as, and less toxic than, conventional amphotericin B. In such patients, where the infecting organism and its susceptibility to fluconazole are known, it would be reasonable to commence treatment with fluconazole; caspofungin is a potential alternative. In neutropenic patients, and in patients infected with fluconazole-resistant organisms, amphotericin continues to be the treatment of choice. Fluconazole has also been successfully used as prophylaxis against Candida infections in neutropenic patients and patients with AIDS, but this in turn has been associated with an increasing incidence of systemic infections with fluconazole-resistant strains.

Itraconazole

Itraconazole is available for both oral and intravenous use. The drug was originally available in capsules, but a newer liquid formulation gives better absorption and pharmacokinetic profile than the original capsule preparation, leading to significantly greater bioavailability and higher serum levels. Systemic bioavailability of itraconazole oral solution is around 55% optimised under fasting conditions. Itraconazole is extensively metabolised by the liver, predominantly by the CYP 3A4 isoenzyme system and is known to undergo enterohepatic circulation. This is a broad-spectrum antifungal which is effective against yeasts, dermatophytes, the ‘pathogenic’ fungi and some filamentous fungi, such as Aspergillus.

Clinical use

In deep-seated infection, itraconazole is used to treat infections due to the ‘pathogenic’ fungi, but there is less published evidence of its use in the treatment of systemic candidiasis and it cannot be recommended for this purpose (Maertens and Boogaerts, 2005). However, it may be useful in patients who are infected with strains resistant to fluconazole, some of which may remain sensitive to itraconazole, and in patients who are for some reason unable to tolerate fluconazole. It has also been used to treat cryptococcosis, despite its poor penetration of cerebrospinal fluid, and in that condition, it is an alternative to fluconazole for patients who cannot take the latter drug. However, one study comparing fluconazole and itraconazole as maintenance treatment for cryptococcosis was discontinued due to the high rate of relapse in the itraconazole arm.

There is now considerable evidence to support the use of itraconazole as a prophylactic agent in immunocompromised patients. It has been shown to be effective in reducing the incidence of systemic fungal infection compared to placebo and to be more effective than fluconazole, although this is due to a greater reduction in infections due to filamentous fungi, including Aspergillus.

Voriconazole

Voriconazole is available for both oral and intravenous administration. It has advantages over itraconazole in that its absorption from the gastro-intestinal tract is significantly better and is not affected by reductions in gastric acidity due to disease or concomitant medication. Its spectrum of activity is similar to that of itraconazole, but it is more active against Fusarium species, a mould which causes superficial infection of the nails and cornea, and occasionally systemic infection in immunocompromised patients.

Clinical use

The main clinical indication for the use of voriconazole is aspergillosis. Studies have shown improved efficacy compared to conventional amphotericin B in systemic Aspergillus infection. The largest randomised control trial demonstrates that voriconazole is superior to amphotericin B deoxycholate as primary therapy of Aspergillosis (Walsh et al., 2008). One particular indication is cerebral aspergillosis. Although rare, this carries a high mortality rate (90% or higher), and one study has shown this to be reduced by voriconazole, presumably due to its better penetration into the central nervous system. In addition to aspergillosis, voriconazole is also licensed for the treatment of Fusarium infection and for the management of patients infected with strains of Candida resistant to fluconazole. It has been shown to be as efficacious as amphotericin B followed by fluconazole in the treatment of candidaemia in patients who were not neutropenic, but it is not licensed for this indication.

Caspofungin

Caspofungin was the first of the echinocandins to become available for routine use, and others, such as micafungin and anidulafungin, have only recently become available. These agents interfere with the production of the fungal cell wall by inhibiting the synthesis of an important component, 1,3-ß-d-glucan. This is a target which does not exist in mammalian cells, providing selective toxicity against fungi. Caspofungin has a significant advantage over the triazoles in that it does not inhibit the cytochrome P450 system and therefore is not associated with such a wide range of drug interactions.

Choice of treatment

A recent development has been the use of combinations of antifungal agents to improve on the results of single agents. At the present time, there is little firm evidence to support the use of such combinations. Amphotericin B plus flucytosine in the treatment of cryptococcosis is the only combination where evidence exists of increased efficacy over either agent alone. However, faced with a seriously ill patient not responding to single agents, it is not surprising that many clinicians attempt the use of a combination of antifungals, even though the evidence is that the results are no better than monotherapy.

Practice points regarding the drug toxicity in systemic antifungal agents are detailed in Table 42.9.

Table 42.9 Practice points

Drug toxicity in systemic antifungal agents
Infusion-related side effects • Particularly with conventional amphotericin B
• Lipid-based preparations also show these, but to a lesser extent
Nephrotoxicity • Particularly with conventional amphotericin B
• Results in renal dysfunction
• Cessation of treatment may be required
• Drug-level monitoring is not helpful in prevention
• Potassium loss and hypokalaemia are a serious complication
• Renal toxicity may be potentiated by concomitant nephrotoxic agents
Hepatotoxicity • Associated with the azole antifungals
• Was particularly severe with ketoconazole
• The newer triazoles may also cause serious liver damage
Bone marrow suppression • Associated with flucytosine
• Dose-related problem, so drug-level monitoring may help to prevent it
• Tends to preclude the use of flucytosine in patients whose marrow is already damaged (e.g. in haematological malignancy or following bone marrow transplant)
Drug interactions • Associated particularly with the azoles
• Due to their mode of action in inhibiting the cytochrome P450 system
• A wide range of drugs may be affected, some with serious interactions
Difficulties in drug administration
Drug precipitation • Amphotericin B will precipitate out if given in electrolyte-containing infusions
• This may also happen in 5% dextrose due to acidity resulting from the manufacturing process
Need for a test dose • Required for all amphotericin B preparations
Long infusion times and/or large infusion volumes • A particular problem with conventional amphotericin
• Long infusion times mean reduced access to intravenous cannulae for other purposes
• Large infusion volumes may be undesirable in patients with renal or cardiac dysfunction
Variable absorption when taken by mouth • A known problem with itraconazole
• Absorption is reduced in the presence of raised gastric pH (e.g. following the use of antacids or drugs such as omeprazole)
• Absorption is increased in the presence of food or if taken with a cola drink
• Subtherapeutic levels may occur due to poor absorption
• Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to avoid low levels
Resistance to antifungal agents
Amphotericin B • Usually seen as a very broad-spectrum antifungal, but inherent resistance is seen in several clinically significant species:
Aspergillus terreus
Candida lusitaniae
Scedosporium apiospermum
• Acquired resistance developing during treatment is very uncommon
• Lipid preparations have identical in vitro antifungal activity to the conventional form
Flucytosine • Acquired resistance during treatment is very common in Candida species
• Monotherapy promotes the rapid development of resistance
• Combination therapy with amphotericin will reduce the possibility of acquired resistance developing during treatment
Fluconazole • Some species of Candida are inherently resistant or less susceptible to fluconazole:
C. krusei
C. glabrata
• Long-term use of fluconazole may result in increased infections with these more resistant strains
• Long-term use may also result in reduced susceptibility in strains of C. albicans

Case studies

Answer

This is a difficult issue. Griseofulvin is contraindicated, due to its known teratogenicity in animals. In addition, this drug decreases the effectiveness of oral contraceptives, so it would not be appropriate to give it along with an oral contraceptive agent to prevent pregnancy during use. It is also recommended that oral contraception be continued for at least a month after discontinuing griseofulvin. Therefore, in this patient, it is not an appropriate choice.

The position of itraconazole is a little different. Like griseofulvin, it has the U.S. Food & Drugs Administration (FDA) category C (studies show fetal harm in animals, but evidence in human beings is lacking), but there is at least one report of almost 200 women given itraconazole in the first trimester of pregnancy without evidence of fetal harm. In the current state of knowledge, however, it would be difficult to recommend itraconazole to this patient.

Terbinafine carries FDA category B (no evidence in animal studies of fetal harm, but studies proving safety in pregnant women are not available). Therefore, it could be given to the patient if the benefit outweighs the risk, but since this is not a serious condition, this approach would be difficult to justify.

After some discussion, the patient decided that she wanted the condition treated more than she wanted to become pregnant, so she opted to take a course of terbinafine but return to using her oral contraception until the treatment course was complete.

Answer

Treatment of infections in burns patients can be challenging as the loss in skin integrity increases the risk of being colonised with various endogenous and hospital-acquired bacteria and fungi. Patients with haematological malignancies and chemotherapy treatment are more vulnerable to opportunistic infections, and this case has an additional co-morbidity on top.

Ideally, antibiotics should be avoided in a patient who has an invasive fungal infection as it is believed that killing the bacterial flora helps fungi thrive in the absence of commensal competition. In this case, the patient has concomitant Gram-negative sepsis and lacks a strong bodily defence system because of his underlying disease condition.

Candida krusei is known to be resistant to fluconazole. It is difficult to treat intravenous catheter and other line infections with systemic antibiotics and antifugals alone. It is imperative that these lines are taken out, and treatment given through temporary peripheral lines for at least 48 h before a new central line is inserted. New lines are very likely to get colonised with the same microorganisms if inserted too early. Both Candida albicans and Candida krusei can be treated with a lipid formulation of amphotericin (use of non-lipid conventional formulations of amphotericin should be avoided as the patient has a moderate degree of renal failure and his present condition could deteriorate).

The duration of treatment can be decided based on daily clinical follow-up that includes imaging and echo cardiograms for up to 2 weeks to look for seeding of Candida in other organs. Choice of antifungals can be reviewed after antifungal sensitivity is made available and amphotericin can be switched to caspofungin if necessary.