Fever without a Focus

Published on 27/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Pediatrics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3339 times

Chapter 170 Fever without a Focus

Fever without a focus refers to a rectal temperature of 38°C or higher as the sole presenting feature. The terms “fever without localizing signs” and “fever of unknown origin” (FUO) are subcategories of fever without a focus.

Fever without Localizing Signs

Fever of acute onset, with duration of <1 wk and without localizing signs, is a common diagnostic dilemma in children <36 mo of age. The etiology and evaluation of fever without localizing signs depends on the age of the child. Traditionally, 3 age groups are considered: neonates or infants to 1 mo of age, infants >1 mo to 3 mo of age, and children >3 mo to 3 yr of age. In 1993, practice guidelines were published to aid the clinician in evaluating the otherwise healthy 0 to 36 mo old with fever without a source. However, with the advent and extensive use of the conjugate Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) and Streptococcus pneumoniae vaccines, the rates of infections with these 2 pathogens have decreased substantially. As a consequence, modifications to the 1993 guidelines have been advocated as described later. Children in high-risk groups (Table 170-1) require a more-aggressive approach and consideration of a broader differential diagnosis.

Table 170-1 FEBRILE PATIENTS AT INCREASED RISK FOR SERIOUS BACTERIAL INFECTIONS

RISK GROUP DIAGNOSTIC CONSIDERATIONS
IMMUNOCOMPETENT PATIENTS
Neonates (<28 days) Sepsis and meningitis caused by group B streptococcus, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes; neonatal herpes simplex virus infection, enteroviruses
Infants 1-3 mo Serious bacterial disease in 10-15%, including bacteremia in 5%; urinary tract infection
Infants and children 3-36 mo Occult bacteremia in <0.5% of children immunized with both Haemophilus influenzae type b and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines; urinary tract infections
Hyperpyrexia (>40°C) Meningitis, bacteremia, pneumonia, heatstroke, hemorrhagic shock-encephalopathy syndrome
Fever with petechiae Bacteremia and meningitis caused by Neisseria meningitidis, H. influenzae type b, and Streptococcus pneumoniae
IMMUNOCOMPROMISED PATIENTS
Sickle cell disease Sepsis, pneumonia, and meningitis caused by S. pneumoniae, osteomyelitis caused by Salmonella and Staphylococcus aureus
Asplenia Bacteremia and meningitis caused by N. meningitidis, H. influenzae type b, and S. pneumoniae
Complement or properdin deficiency Sepsis caused by N. meningitidis
Agammaglobulinemia Bacteremia, sinopulmonary infections
AIDS S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae type b, and Salmonella infections
Congenital heart disease Infective endocarditis; brain abscess with right-to-left shunting
Central venous line Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Candida
Malignancy Bacteremia with gram-negative enteric bacteria, S. aureus, and coagulase-negative staphylococci; fungemia with Candida and Aspergillus

Neonates

Neonates who experience fever without focus are a challenge to evaluate because they display limited signs of infection, making it difficult to clinically distinguish between a serious bacterial infection and self-limited viral illness. Immature immune responses in the first few months of life also increase the significance of fever in the young infant. In general, neonates who have a fever and do not appear ill have a 7% risk of having a serious bacterial infection. Serious bacterial infections include occult bacteremia, meningitis, pneumonia, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, enteritis, and urinary tract infections. Although neonates with serious infection can acquire community pathogens, they are mainly at risk for late-onset neonatal bacterial diseases (group B streptococci, Escherichia coli, and Listeria monocytogenes) and perinatally acquired herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection.

Practice guidelines recommend that if a neonate has had a fever recorded at home by a reliable parent, the patient should be treated as a febrile neonate. If excessive clothing and blankets encasing the infant are suspected of falsely elevating the body temperature, then the excessive coverings should be removed and the temperature retaken in 15 to 30 minutes. If body temperature is normal after the covers are removed, then the infant is considered afebrile.

Owing to the unreliability of physical findings and the presence of an immature immune system, all febrile neonates should be hospitalized; blood, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) should be cultured, and the child should receive empirical intravenous antibiotics. CSF studies should include cell counts, glucose and protein levels, Gram stain, and culture; HSV and enterovirus polymerase chain reaction should be considered. Stool culture and chest radiograph may also be part of the evaluation. Combination antibiotics such as ampicillin and cefotaxime are recommended. Acyclovir should be included if HSV infection is suspected owing to the presence of CSF pleocytosis or known maternal history of genital HSV, especially at the time of delivery.

1 Month to 3 Months

The large majority of children with fever without localizing signs in the 1-3 mo age group likely have a viral syndrome. In contrast to bacterial infections, most viral diseases have a distinct seasonal pattern: respiratory syncytial virus and influenza A virus infections are more common during the winter, whereas enterovirus infections usually occur in the summer and fall. Although a viral infection is the most likely etiology, fever in this age group should always suggest the possibility of serious bacterial disease. Organisms to consider include group B streptococcus, L. monocytogenes, Salmonella enteritis, E. coli, Neisseria meningitidis, S. pneumoniae, Hib, and Staphylococcus aureus. Pyelonephritis is more common in uncircumcised infant boys and infants with urinary tract anomalies. Other potential bacterial diseases in this age group include otitis media, pneumonia, omphalitis, mastitis, and other skin and soft tissue infections.

Ill-appearing (toxic) febrile infants ≤3 mo of age require prompt hospitalization and immediate parenteral antimicrobial therapy after cultures of blood, urine, and CSF are obtained. Ampicillin (to cover L. monocytogenes and enterococcus) plus either ceftriaxone or cefotaxime is an effective initial antimicrobial regimen for ill-appearing infants without focal findings. This regimen is effective against the usual bacterial pathogens causing sepsis, urinary tract infection, and enteritis in young infants. However, if meningitis is suspected because of CSF abnormalities, vancomycin should be included to treat possible penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae until the results of culture and susceptibility tests are known.

Many academic institutions have investigated the optimal management of low-risk patients in this age group with fever without a focus (Table 170-2). The use of viral diagnostic studies (enteroviruses, respiratory viruses, rotavirus, and herpesvirus) in combination with the Rochester Criteria or similar criteria can enhance the ability to determine which infants are at high risk for serious bacterial infections (see Table 170-2). Febrile infants in whom a virus has been detected are at low or no risk of a serious bacterial infection. Well-appearing infants 1-3 mo of age can be managed safely using low-risk laboratory and clinical criteria as indicated in Table 170-2 if reliable parents are involved and close follow-up is assured.

Table 170-2 LOW RISK CRITERIA IN 1-3 MONTHS OLD WITH FEVER

BOSTON CRITERIA

Infants are at low risk if they appear well, have normal physical examination, have a caretaker reachable by telephone, and laboratory tests are as follows:

PHILADELPHIA PROTOCOL

Infants are at low risk if they appear well, have a normal physical examination, and laboratory tests are as follows:

PITTSBURGH GUIDELINES

Infants are at low risk if they appear well, have a normal physical examination, and laboratory tests are as follows:

ROCHESTER CRITERIA

Infants are at low risk if they appear well, have a normal physical examination, and laboratory findings are as follows:

CBC, complete blood count; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; HPF, high-powered field; RBC, red blood cell; WBC: white blood cell.

Infants 1-3 mo of age with fever who appear generally well; who have been previously healthy; who have no evidence of skin, soft tissue, bone, joint, or ear infection; and who have a peripheral white blood cell (WBC) count of 5,000-15,000 cells/µL, an absolute band count of <1,500 cells/µL, and normal urinalysis and negative culture (blood and urine) results are unlikely to have a serious bacterial infection. The negative predictive value with 95% confidence of these criteria for any serious bacterial infection is >98% and for bacteremia is >99%. Among serious bacterial infections, pyelonephritis is the most common and may be seen in well-appearing infants who have fever without a focus or in those who appear ill. Urinalysis may be negative in infants <2 mo of age with pyelonephritis. Bacteremia is present in <30% of infants with pyelonephritis.

The decision to obtain CSF studies in the well-appearing 1-3 mo old infant depends on the decision to administer empirical antibiotics. If close observation without antibiotics is planned, a lumbar puncture may be deferred. If the child deteriorates clinically, a full sepsis evaluation should be performed, and intravenous antibiotics should be administered. If empirical antibiotics are initiated, CSF studies should be obtained, preferably before administering antibiotics.

3 Months to 36 Months of Age

Approximately 30% of febrile children in the 3-36 mo age group have no localizing signs of infection. Viral infections are the cause of the vast majority of fevers in this population, but serious bacterial infections do occur and are caused by the same pathogens listed for patients 1-3 mo of age, except for the perinatally acquired infections. S. pneumoniae, N. meningitidis, and Salmonella account for most cases of occult bacteremia. Hib was an important cause of occult bacteremia in young children before universal immunization with conjugate Hib vaccines and remains common in underdeveloped countries that have not implemented these vaccines.

Risk factors indicating increased probability of occult bacteremia include temperature ≥39°C, WBC count ≥15,000/µL, and elevated absolute neutrophil count, band count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or C-reactive protein. The incidence of bacteremia and/or pneumonia or pyelonephritis, among infants 3-36 mo of age increases as the temperature (especially >40°C) and WBC count (especially >25,000) increase. However, no combination of laboratory tests or clinical assessment is completely accurate in predicting the presence of occult bacteremia. Socioeconomic status, race, sex, and age (within the range of 3-36 mo) do not appear to affect the risk for occult bacteremia.

Without therapy, occult bacteremia due to pneumococcus can resolve spontaneously without sequelae, can persist, or can lead to localized infections such as meningitis, pneumonia, cellulitis, pericarditis, osteomyelitis, or suppurative arthritis. The pattern of sequelae may be related to host factors and the offending organism. In some children, the occult bacteremic illness can represent the early signs of serious localized infection rather than a transient disease state. Hib bacteremia is characteristically associated with a higher risk for localized serious infection than is bacteremia due to S. pneumoniae. Hospitalized children with Hib bacteremia often develop focal infections, such as meningitis, epiglottitis, cellulitis, pericarditis, or osteoarticular infection, and spontaneous resolution of bacteremia is rare. Among patients with pneumococcal bacteremia (occult or focal), spontaneous resolution occurs in 30-40%, with a higher rate of spontaneous resolution among well-appearing children.

Important bacterial infections among children 3-36 mo of age with localizing signs include otitis media, sinusitis, pneumonia (not always evident without a chest x-ray), enteritis, urinary tract infection, osteomyelitis, and meningitis.

Treatment of toxic-appearing febrile children 3-36 mo of age who do not have focal signs of infection includes hospitalization and prompt institution of antimicrobial therapy after specimens of blood, urine, and CSF are obtained for culture. Consensus practice guidelines published in 1993 recommended that children 3-36 mo of age who have a temperature of <39°C and do not appear toxic be observed as outpatients without performing diagnostic tests or administering antimicrobial agents. For nontoxic-appearing infants with a rectal temperature of ≥39°C, options include obtaining a blood culture and administering empirical antibiotic therapy (ceftriaxone, a single dose of 50 mg/kg, not to exceed 1 g); if the WBC count is >15,000/µL, obtaining a blood culture and beginning empirical antibiotic therapy; or obtaining a blood culture and observing as outpatients without empirical antibiotic therapy, with return for re-evaluation within 24 hr. Guidelines for managing febrile children 3-36 mo of age who have received both Hib and S. pneumoniae conjugate vaccines have not been established, but careful observation without empirical administration of antibiotic therapy is generally prudent. Because fully vaccinated young children are at a much lower risk of occult bacteremia and meningitis as the cause of acute fever without localizing signs, some advocate that the only laboratory tests needed in this age group when temperature is >39°C are a urinalysis and urine culture for circumcised boys <6 mo of age and uncircumcised boys and all girls <24 mo of age. Regardless of the management option (Table 170-3), the family should be instructed to return immediately if the child’s condition deteriorates or new symptoms develop.

Table 170-3 MANAGEMENT OF FEVER WITHOUT LOCALIZING SIGNS

GROUP MANAGEMENT
Any toxic-appearing child 0-36 mo and temperature ≥38°C Hospitalize, broad cultures plus other tests,* parenteral antibiotics
Child <1 mo and temperature ≥38°C Hospitalize, broad cultures plus other tests,* parenteral antibiotics
Child 1-3 mo and temperature ≥38°C

Child 3-36 mo and temperature 38-39°C Reassurance that diagnosis is likely self-limiting viral infection, but advise return with persistence of fever, temperatures >39°C, and new signs and symptoms Child 3-36 mo and temperature >39°C

If did not receive conjugate pneumococcal and H. influenzae type b vaccines, manage according to the 1993 Guidelines (see Baraff et al. Pediatrics 1993;92:1-12)

CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; HPF, high-powered field; RBC, red blood cell; WBC, white blood cell.

* Other tests may include chest radiograph, stool studies, herpes simplex polymerase chain reaction.

Empirical antibiotic therapy for well-appearing children <36 mo of age who have not received Hib and S. pneumoniae conjugate vaccines and who have a rectal temperature of >39°C and a WBC count of >15,000/µL is strongly recommended. If blood cultures are obtained and S. pneumoniae is isolated from the blood, the child should return to the physician as soon as possible after the culture results are known. If the child appears well, is afebrile, and has a normal physical exam, a second blood culture should be obtained and the child should be treated with 7-10 days of oral antimicrobial therapy. If the child appears ill and continues to have fever with no identifiable focus of infection at the time of follow-up, or if H. influenzae, or N. meningitidis is present in the initial blood culture, the child should have a repeat blood culture, be evaluated for meningitis (including lumbar puncture), and receive treatment in the hospital with appropriate intravenous antimicrobial agents. If the child develops a localized infection, therapy should be directed toward the likely pathogens.

Fever of Unknown Origin

The classification of FUO is best reserved for children with fever documented by a health care provider and for which the cause could not be identified after 3 wk of evaluation as an outpatient or after 1 wk of evaluation in the hospital (Table 170-4).

Etiology

The many causes of FUO in children are infections and rheumatologic (connective tissue or autoimmune) diseases (Table 170-5). Neoplastic disorders should also be seriously considered, although most children with malignancies do not have fever alone. The possibility of drug fever should be considered if the patient is receiving any drug. Drug fever is usually sustained and not associated with other symptoms. Discontinuation of the drug is associated with resolution of the fever, generally within 72 hr, although certain drugs, such as iodides, are excreted for a prolonged period with fever that can persist for as long as 1 mo after drug withdrawal.

Table 170-5 DIAGNOSTIC CONSIDERATIONS OF FEVER OF UNKNOWN ORIGIN IN CHILDREN

ABSCESSES

BACTERIAL DISEASES

LOCALIZED INFECTIONS

FUNGAL DISEASES

VIRUSES

PARASITIC DISEASES

RHEUMATOLOGIC DISEASES

HYPERSENSITIVITY DISEASES

NEOPLASMS

GRANULOMATOUS DISEASES

FAMILIAL AND HEREDITARY DISEASES

MISCELLANEOUS

Most fevers of unknown or unrecognized origin result from atypical presentations of common diseases. In some cases, the presentation as an FUO is characteristic of the disease, such as juvenile idiopathic arthritis, but the definitive diagnosis can be established only after prolonged observation because initially there are no associated or specific findings on physical examination and all laboratory results are negative or normal.

In the USA, the systemic infectious diseases most commonly implicated in children with FUO are salmonellosis, tuberculosis, rickettsial diseases, syphilis, Lyme disease, cat-scratch disease, atypical prolonged presentations of common viral diseases, infectious mononucleosis, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, viral hepatitis, coccidioidomycosis, histoplasmosis, malaria, and toxoplasmosis. Less common infectious causes of FUO include tularemia, brucellosis, leptospirosis, and rat-bite fever. AIDS alone is not usually responsible for FUO, although febrile illnesses often occur in patients with AIDS as a result of opportunistic infections (see Table 170-4).

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are the connective tissue diseases associated most commonly with FUO. Inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatic fever, and Kawasaki disease are also commonly reported as causes of FUO. If factitious fever (inoculation of pyogenic material or manipulation of the thermometer by the patient or parent) is suspected, the presence and pattern of fever should be documented in the hospital. Prolonged and continuous observation, which can include electronic or video surveillance, of patients is imperative. FUO lasting >6 mo is uncommon in children and suggests granulomatous or autoimmune disease. Repeat interval evaluation, including history, physical examination, laboratory evaluation, and roentgenographic studies is required.

Diagnosis

The evaluation of FUO requires a thorough history and physical examination supplemented by a few screening laboratory tests and additional laboratory and radiographic tests as indicated by the history or abnormalities on examination or initial screening (see Table 170-5).

History

The age of the patient is helpful in evaluating FUO. Children >6 yr of age often have a respiratory or genitourinary tract infection, localized infection (abscess, osteomyelitis), JIA, or, rarely, leukemia. Adolescent patients are more likely to have tuberculosis, inflammatory bowel disease, autoimmune processes, or lymphoma, in addition to the causes of FUO found in younger children.

A history of exposure to wild or domestic animals should be solicited. Zoonotic infections in the USA are increasing in incidence and are often acquired from pets that are not overtly ill. Immunization of dogs against specific disorders such as leptospirosis can prevent canine disease but does not always prevent the animal from carrying and shedding leptospires, which may be transmitted to household contacts. A history of ingestion of rabbit or squirrel meat might provide a clue to the diagnosis of oropharyngeal, glandular, or typhoidal tularemia. A history of tick bite or travel to tick- or parasite-infested areas should be obtained.

Any history of pica should be elicited. Ingestion of dirt is a particularly important clue to infection with Toxocara canis (visceral larva migrans) or Toxoplasma gondii (toxoplasmosis).

A history of unusual dietary habits or travel as early as the birth of the child should be sought. Malaria, histoplasmosis, and coccidioidomycosis can re-emerge years after visiting or living in an endemic area. It is important to identify prophylactic immunizations and precautions taken by the patient against ingestion of contaminated water or food during foreign travel. Rocks, dirt, and artifacts from geographically distant regions that have been collected and brought into the home as souvenirs can serve as vectors of disease.

A medication history should be pursued rigorously. This history should elicit information about over-the-counter preparations and topical agents, including eye drops, that may be associated with atropine-induced fever.

The genetic background of a patient also is important. Descendants of the Ulster Scots may have FUO because they are afflicted with nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Familial dysautonomia (Riley-Day syndrome), a disorder in which hyperthermia is recurrent, is more common among Jews than other population groups. Ancestry from the Mediterranean should suggest the possibility of familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). Both FMF and hyperimmunoglobulin D syndrome are inherited as autosomal-recessive disorders. Tumor necrosis factor receptor–associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS) and Muckle-Wells syndrome are inherited as autosomal dominant traits.

Physical Examination

A complete physical examination is essential to find any physical clues to the underlying diagnosis (Table 170-6). The child’s general appearance, including sweating during fever, should be noted. The continuing absence of sweat in the presence of an elevated or changing body temperature suggests dehydration due to vomiting, diarrhea, or central or nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. It also should suggest anhidrotic ectodermal dysplasia, familial dysautonomia, or exposure to atropine.

Table 170-6 EXAMPLES OF SUBTLE PHYSICAL FINDINGS HAVING SPECIAL SIGNIFICANCE IN PATIENTS WITH FEVER OF UNKNOWN ORIGIN

BODY SITE PHYSICAL FINDING DIAGNOSIS
Head Sinus tenderness Sinusitis
Temporal artery Nodules, reduced pulsations Temporal arteritis
Oropharynx Ulceration Disseminated histoplasmosis
Tender tooth Periapical abscess
Fundi or conjunctivae Choroid tubercle Disseminated granulomatosis*
Petechiae, Roth’s spot Endocarditis
Thyroid Enlargement, tenderness Thyroiditis
Heart Murmur Infective or marantic endocarditis
Abdomen Enlarged iliac crest lymph nodes, splenomegaly Lymphoma, endocarditis, disseminated granulomatosis*
Rectum Perirectal fluctuance, tenderness Abscess
Prostatic tenderness, fluctuance Abscess
Genitalia Testicular nodule Periarteritis nodosa
Epididymal nodule Disseminated granulomatosis
Lower extremities Deep venous tenderness Thrombosis or thrombophlebitis
Skin and nails Petechiae, splinter hemorrhages, subcutaneous nodules, clubbing Vasculitis, endocarditis

* Includes tuberculosis, histoplasmosis, coccidioidomycosis, sarcoidosis, and syphilis.

From Mandell GL, Bennett, JE, Dolin R, editors: Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases, ed 7, Philadelphia, 2010, Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier, 2010, p 785, Table 51-8.

A careful ophthalmic examination is important. Red, weeping eyes may be a sign of connective tissue disease, particularly polyarteritis nodosa. Palpebral conjunctivitis in a febrile patient may be a clue to measles, coxsackievirus infection, tuberculosis, infectious mononucleosis, lymphogranuloma venereum, and cat-scratch disease. In contrast, bulbar conjunctivitis in a child with FUO suggests Kawasaki disease or leptospirosis. Petechial conjunctival hemorrhages suggest infective endocarditis. Uveitis suggests sarcoidosis, JIA, SLE, Kawasaki disease, Behçet disease, and vasculitis. Chorioretinitis suggests CMV, toxoplasmosis, and syphilis. Proptosis suggests an orbital tumor, thyrotoxicosis, metastasis (neuroblastoma), orbital infection, Wegener granulomatosis, or pseudotumor.

The ophthalmoscope should also be used to examine nailfold capillary abnormalities that are associated with connective tissue diseases such as juvenile dermatomyositis and systemic scleroderma. Immersion oil or lubricating jelly is placed on the skin adjacent to the nailbed, and the capillary pattern is observed with the ophthalmoscope set on +40.

FUO is sometimes caused by hypothalamic dysfunction. A clue to this disorder is failure of pupillary constriction due to absence of the sphincter constrictor muscle of the eye. This muscle develops embryologically when hypothalamic structure and function also are undergoing differentiation.

Fever resulting from familial dysautonomia may be suggested by lack of tears, an absent corneal reflex, or a smooth tongue with absence of fungiform papillae. Tenderness to tapping over the sinuses or the upper teeth suggests sinusitis. Recurrent oral candidiasis may be a clue to various disorders of the immune system.

Fever blisters are common findings in patients with pneumococcal, streptococcal, malarial, and rickettsial infection. These lesions also are common in children with meningococcal meningitis (which usually does not manifest as FUO) but rarely are seen in children with meningococcemia. Fever blisters also are occasionally seen with Salmonella or staphylococcal infections.

Hyperemia of the pharynx, with or without exudate, suggests infectious mononucleosis, CMV infection, toxoplasmosis, salmonellosis, tularemia, Kawasaki disease, or leptospirosis.

The muscles and bones should be palpated carefully. Point tenderness over a bone can suggest occult osteomyelitis or bone marrow invasion from neoplastic disease. Tenderness over the trapezius muscle may be a clue to subdiaphragmatic abscess. Generalized muscle tenderness suggests dermatomyositis, trichinosis, polyarteritis, Kawasaki disease, or mycoplasmal or arboviral infection.

Rectal examination can reveal perirectal lymphadenopathy or tenderness, which suggests a deep pelvic abscess, iliac adenitis, or pelvic osteomyelitis. A guaiac test should be obtained; occult blood loss can suggest granulomatous colitis or ulcerative colitis as the cause of FUO.

Repetitive chills and temperature spikes are common in children with septicemia (regardless of cause), particularly when associated with kidney disease, liver or biliary disease, infective endocarditis, malaria, brucellosis, rat-bite fever, or a loculated collection of pus. The general activity of the patient and the presence or absence of rashes should be noted. Hyperactive deep tendon reflexes can suggest thyrotoxicosis as the cause of FUO.

Laboratory Evaluation

The laboratory evaluation of the child with FUO and whether the evaluation will occur in the inpatient or outpatient realm are determined on a case-by-case basis. Hospitalization may be required for laboratory or radiographic studies that are unavailable or impractical in an ambulatory setting, for more-careful observation, or for temporary relief of parents’ anxiety. The tempo of diagnostic evaluation should be adjusted to the tempo of the illness; haste may be imperative in a critically ill patient, but if the illness is more chronic, the evaluation can proceed in systematic fashion and can be carried out in an outpatient setting. If there are no clues in the patient’s history or on physical examination that suggest a specific infection or area of suspicion, it is unlikely that diagnostic studies will be helpful. In that common scenario, continued surveillance and repeated re-evaluations of the child should be employed to detect any new clinical findings.

Although ordering a large number of diagnostic tests in every child with FUO according to a predetermined list is discouraged, certain studies should be considered in the evaluation. A complete blood cell count with a differential white blood cell count and a urinalysis should be part of the initial laboratory evaluation. An absolute neutrophil count of <5,000/µL is evidence against indolent bacterial infection other than typhoid fever. Conversely, in patients with a polymorphonuclear leukocyte count of >10,000/µL or a nonsegmented polymorphonuclear leukocyte count of >500/µL a severe bacterial infection is highly likely. Direct examination of the blood smear with Giemsa or Wright stain can reveal organisms of malaria, trypanosomiasis, babesiosis, or relapsing fever.

An erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of >30 mm/hr indicates inflammation and the need for further evaluation for infectious, autoimmune, or malignant diseases. An ESR of >100 mm/hr suggests tuberculosis, Kawasaki disease, malignancy, or autoimmune disease. A low ESR does not eliminate the possibility of infection or JIA. C-reactive protein is another acute-phase reactant that becomes elevated and returns to normal more rapidly than the ESR. Experts may prefer to check 1 of the 2 because there is no evidence that measuring both the ESR and C-reactive protein in the same patient with FUO is clinically useful.

Blood cultures should be obtained aerobically. Anaerobic blood cultures have an extremely low yield and should be obtained only if there are specific reasons to suspect anaerobic infection. Multiple or repeated blood cultures may be required to detect bacteremia associated with infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, or deep-seated abscesses. Polymicrobial bacteremia suggests factitious self-induced infection or gastrointestinal (GI) pathology. The isolation of leptospires, Francisella, or Yersinia can require selective media or specific conditions not routinely used. Urine culture should be obtained routinely.

Tuberculin skin testing (TST) should be performed with intradermal placement of 5 units of purified protein derivative (PPD) that has been kept appropriately refrigerated.

Radiographic examination of the chest, sinuses, mastoids, or GI tract may be indicated by specific historical or physical findings. Radiographic evaluation of the GI tract for inflammatory bowel disease may be helpful in evaluating selected children with FUO and no other localizing signs or symptoms.

Examination of the bone marrow can reveal leukemia; metastatic neoplasm; mycobacterial, fungal, or parasitic diseases; and histiocytosis, hemophagocytosis, or storage diseases. If a bone marrow aspirate is performed, cultures for bacteria, mycobacteria, and fungi should be obtained.

Serologic tests can aid in the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis, CMV infection, toxoplasmosis, salmonellosis, tularemia, brucellosis, leptospirosis, cat-scratch disease, Lyme disease, rickettsial disease, and, on some occasions, JIA. The clinician should be aware that the reliability and sensitivity and specificity of these tests vary; for instance, serologic tests for Lyme disease outside of reference laboratories have been generally unreliable.

Radionuclide scans may be helpful in detecting abdominal abscesses as well as osteomyelitis, especially if the focus cannot be localized to a specific limb or multifocal disease is suspected. Gallium citrate (67Ga) localizes inflammatory tissues (leukocytes) associated with tumors or abscesses. 99mTc phosphate is useful for detecting osteomyelitis before plain roentgenograms demonstrate bone lesions. Granulocytes tagged with indium (111In) or iodinated IgG may be useful in detecting localized pyogenic processes. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is a helpful imaging modality in adults with an FUO and can contribute to an ultimate diagnosis in 30-60% of patients. Echocardiograms can demonstrate the presence of a vegetation on the leaflets of heart valves, suggesting infective endocarditis. Ultrasonography can identify intra-abdominal abscesses of the liver, subphrenic space, pelvis, or spleen.

Total body CT or MRI (both with contrast) permits detection of neoplasms and collections of purulent material without the use of surgical exploration or radioisotopes. CT and MRI are helpful in identifying lesions of the head, neck, chest, retroperitoneal spaces, liver, spleen, intra-abdominal and intrathoracic lymph nodes, kidneys, pelvis, and mediastinum. CT or ultrasound-guided aspiration or biopsy of suspicious lesions has reduced the need for exploratory laparotomy or thoracotomy. MRI is particularly useful for detecting osteomyelitis if there is concern about a specific limb. Diagnostic imaging can be very helpful in confirming or evaluating a suspected diagnosis but rarely leads to an unsuspected cause, and in the case of CT scans, the child is exposed to large amounts of radiation.

Biopsy is occasionally helpful in establishing a diagnosis of FUO. Bronchoscopy, laparoscopy, mediastinoscopy, and GI endoscopy can provide direct visualization and biopsy material when organ-specific manifestations are present. When employing any of the more-invasive testing, the risk:benefit ratio for the patient must always be taken into consideration before proceeding further.

Bibliography

American Academy of Pediatrics. Fever and antipyretic use in children. Pediatrics. 2011;127:580-587.

Baker MD, Bell LM, Avner JR. Outpatient management without antibiotics of fever in selected infants. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1437-1441.

Baker MD, Bell LM, Avner JR. The efficacy of routine outpatient management without antibiotics of fever in selected infants. Pediatrics. 1999;103:627-631.

Baraff LJ. Management of infants and young children with fever without source. Pediatr Ann. 2008;37:673-679.

Baraff LJ, Schriger DL, Bass JW, et al. Practice guideline for the management of infants and children 0 to 36 months of age with fever without source. Pediatrics. 1993;92:1-12.

Baskin MN, O’Rourke EJ, Fleisher GR. Outpatient treatment of febrile infants 28 to 89 days with intramuscular administration of ceftriaxone. J Pediatr. 1992;120:22-27.

Bateman SL, Seed PC. Procession to pediatric bacteremia and sepsis: covert operations and failures in diplomacy. Pediatrics. 2010;126(1):137-150.

Bleeker-Rovers CP, Vos FJ, de Kleijn MHA, et al. A prospective multicenter study on fever of unknown origin. Medicine. 2007;86:26-28.

Brauner M, Goldman M, Kozer E. Extreme leucocytosis and the risk of serious bacterial infections in febrile children. Arch Dis Child. 2010;95:209-212.

Bressan S, Andreola B, Cattelan F, et al. Predicting severe bacterial infections in well-appearing febrile neonates. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010;29:227-232.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Invasive pneumococcal disease in children 5 years after conjugate vaccine introduction—eight states. 1998-2005. MMWR. 2008;57:144-148.

Craig JC, Williams GJ, Jones M, et al. The accuracy of clinical symptoms and signs for the diagnosis of serious bacterial infection in young febrile children: prospective cohort study of 15,781 febrile illnesses. BMJ. 2010;340:c1594.

Crain EF, Gershel JC. Urinary tract infections in febrile infants younger than 8 weeks of age. Pediatrics. 1990;86:363-367.

Dagan R, Powell KR, Hall CB, et al. Identification of infants unlikely to have serious bacterial infection although hospitalized for suspected sepsis. J Pediatr. 1985;107:855-860.

Dawes M. Identifying sick children on primary care. Lancet. 2010;375:784-785.

Downs SM. Technical report: urinary tract infections in febrile infants and young children. The Urinary Tract Subcommittee of the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Quality Improvement. Pediatrics. 1999;103(4):e54.

Flynn PM. Diagnosis and management of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections in pediatric patients. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28(11):1016-1017.

Galetto-Lacour A, Zamora SA, Andreola B, et al. Validation of a laboratory risk index score for the identification of severe bacterial infection in children with fever without focus. Arch Dis Child. 2010;95:968-973.

Ginsburg CM, McCracken GHJr. Urinary tract infections in young infants. Pediatrics. 1982;69:409-412.

Gómez B, Mintegi S, Benito J, et al. Blood culture and bacteremia predictors in infants less than three months of age with fever without source. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010;29:43-47.

Herr SM, Wald ER, Pitetti RD, et al. Enhanced urinalysis improves identification of febrile infants age 60 days and younger at low risk for serious bacterial illness. Pediatrics. 2001;108:866-871.

Herz AM, Greenhow TL, Alcantara J, et al. Changing epidemiology of outpatient bacteremia in 3 to 36 month-old children after the introduction to the heptavalent-conjugate pneumococcal vaccine. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006;25:293-299.

Huppler AR, Eickhoff JC, Wald ER. Performance of low-risk criteria in the evaluation of young infants with fever: review of the literature. Pediatrics. 2010;125:228-233.

Jaskiewicz JA, McCarthy CA, Richardson AC, et al. Febrile infants at low risk for serious bacterial infection—an appraisal of the Rochester Criteria and implications for management. Pediatrics. 1994;94:390-396.

Kopterides P, Siempos II, Tsangaris I, et al. Procalcitonin-guided algorithms of antibiotic therapy in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(11):2229-2241.

Krief WI, Levine DA, Platt SL, et al. Influenza virus infection and the risk of serious bacterial infections in young febrile infants. Pediatrics. 2009;124:30-39.

Laupland KB, Gregson DB, Vanderkooi OG, et al. The changing burden of pediatric bloodstream infections in Calgary, Canada, 2000-2006. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28:114-117.

Lee GM, Harper MB. Risk of bacteremia for febrile young children in the post-Haemophilus influenzae type b era. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152:624-628.

Naik JD, Sathiyaseelan SRK, Vasudev NS. Febrile neutropenia. BMJ. 2011;342:103-104.

O’Donnell DR. Recognizing severe infection: in hoc signo vinces? Arch Dis Child. 2010;95(12):957-958.

Olaciregui I, Hernández U, Muñoz JA, et al. Makers that predict serious bacterial infection in infants under 3 months of age presenting with fever of unknown origin. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94:501-505.

Rudinsky SL, Carstairs KL, Reardon JM, et al. Serious bacterial infections in febrile infants in the post-pneumococcal conjugate vaccine era. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16:585-590.

Shah SS, Downes KJ, Elliott MR, et al. How long does it take to “rule out” bacteremia in children with central venous catheters? Pediatrics. 2008;121:135-141.

Thompson MJ, Van den Bruel A. Diagnosing serious bacterial infection in young febrile children. BMJ. 2010;340:986-987.

Van den Bruel A, Haj-Hassan T, Thompson M, et al. Diagnostic value of clinical features at presentation to identify serious infection in children in developed countries: a systematic review. Lancet. 2010;375:834-844.

Vidwan G, Geis G. Evaluation, management, and outcome of focal bacterial infections (FBIs) in nontoxic infants under two months of age. J Hosp Med. 2010;5(2):76-82.

Waddle E, Jhaveri R. Outcomes of febrile children without localizing signs after pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94:144-147.