Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Published on 10/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Critical Care Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1392 times

Chapter 13 Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

3 How is ECMO different from cardiopulmonary bypass?

Cardiopulmonary bypass was developed as a means to provide short-term support to patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The setup necessary for cardiopulmonary bypass is also designed to accomplish several other tasks including suction and venting of the field and cardiac chambers and administration of cardioplegia (Table 13-1).

Table 13-1 Differences and Similarities Between ECMO and Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Parameter ECMO Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Oxygenation Yes Yes
Ventilation Yes Yes
Circulatory support Yes Yes
Venous reservoir No Yes
Ability to deliver cardioplegia No Yes
Ability to administer medications into circuit No Yes
Supplemental pumps (e.g., suction, vent) No Yes
Heating and cooling Yes Yes
Ability to adjust oxygenation Yes Yes
Ability to add fluids directly to circuit No Yes
Ability to administer anesthetics in line No Yes

8 What are the components of an ECMO circuit?

An ECMO circuit contains several key components including the vascular access, tubing, driving force (pump), gas exchange unit (oxygenator-ventilator), and interface or console. Vascular access is most commonly established in the femoral artery and veins. The cannulas are sized between 21F and 28F for adults and smaller for newborns and children. The venous or drainage cannula may be positioned into the right atrium under echocardiography or fluoroscopic guidance. The arterial or return cannula is placed in the other femoral vein (venovenous [VV] ECMO) or femoral artery (venoarterial [VA] ECMO).

Most ECMO circuits have a membrane gas exchange unit. This gas exchange unit consists of a series of hollow fibers through which the blood passes. Gas is passed in a countercurrent manner allowing exchange across the membranes. The pump system may be either a roller system or a centrifugal system. A roller pump system consists of flexible tubing in a track. The roller compresses the tubing and forces the blood forward with each turn. Such flow is independent of systemic vascular resistance, and high pressures can develop. Centrifugal pumps have been popular in Europe and are becoming more popular in the United States. Centrifugal pumps contain a magnetically driven impeller, which cycles at several thousand rotations per minute generating a pressure gradient across the pump head and propelling blood forward. It is preload and afterload dependent. If flow into the pump is decreased, then flow and pressure will be decreased. The CentriMag blood pump is a magnetically levitated centrifugal device that produces unidirectional flow and may generate flows up to 10 L/min (Figs. 13-1 and 13-2).

10 What does one monitor while using ECMO?

Monitoring patients subject to ECMO is a multidisciplinary task. Surgeons, intensivists, perfusionists, anesthesiologists, respiratory therapists, and nurses may all be involved in the care of these patients. Maintenance of normal physiologic parameters is the goal (Table 13-3). Flow rates, sweep speed, and FiO2 are adjusted to attain such measure.

Table 13-3 Goals for Management During ECMO

Parameter Goal
Flow rates (mL/kg/min) 50-80
Mean arterial pressure (adult) (mm Hg) 65-95
Sweep speed (gas flow) (mL/kg/min) 50-80
FiO2 (%) 100
pH 7.35-7.45
PaCO2 (mm Hg) 35-45
SpO2 (arterial or return cannula) (%) 100
SpO2 (VA ECMO) (%) > 95
SpO2 (VV ECMO) (%) 85-92

13 How does one wean a patient from ECMO?

The technique of weaning a patient from ECMO support depends on the type of ECMO (VV or VA) and the purpose of the support. In general the lungs and heart assume more responsibility for oxygenation, ventilation, and circulation. Sidebotham et al. describe their technique for weaning ECMO (Table 13-4).

Table 13-4 Weaning a Patient from ECMO Support

Measure VV ECMO VA ECMO
Purpose of support Oxygenation-ventilation Hemodynamic support
Measure of improvement Increased SpO2 and PaO2
Decreased PaCO2
Improved CXR
Increased lung compliance
Return of pulsatile arterial waveform
Improved cardiac function by echocardiography
Technique Provide full ventilatory support
Reduce gas “sweep”
Reduce flows to 1-2 L/min
Adjust inotropic support to provide acceptable hemodynamics
Reduce flows to 1-2 L/min
Monitoring during weaning Maintenance of SpO2/PaO2 Echocardiography (cardiac function)
Blood pressure
Cardiac output
Central venous pressure
Pulmonary artery pressure
When to discontinue Acceptable ABG 2-3 hr after weaning and tolerance of flow reduction to zero Acceptable hemodynamics after 1-2 hr of minimal or no hemodynamics support.

ABG, Arterial blood gases; CXR, chest radiograph.

Modified from Sidebotham D, McGeorge A, McGuinness S, et al: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for treating severe cardiac and respiratory failure in adults: part 2—technical considerations. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 24:164-172, 2010.

Bibliography

1 Augustin P., Lasocki S., Dufour G., et al. Abdominal compartment syndrome due to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:e40–e41.

2 Aziz T.A., Singh G., Popjes E., et al. Initial experience with CentriMag extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for support of critically ill patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010;29:66–71.

3 Brogan T.V., Thiagarajan R.R., Rycos P.T., et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults with severe respiratory failure: a multi-center database. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:2105–2114.

4 Foley D.S., Pranikoff T., Younger J.G., et al. A review of 100 patients transported on extracorporeal life support. ASAIO J. 2002;48:612–619.

5 Hill J.D., O’Brien T.G., Murray J.J., et al. Prolonged extracorporeal oxygenation in severe acute respiratory failure (shock lung syndrome). Use of the Bramson membrane lung. N Engl J Med. 1972;286:629–634.

6 Meilck F., Quintel M. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005;11:87–93.

7 Peek G.J., Mugford M., Tiruvoipai R., et al. CESAR trial collaboration. Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilator support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure [CESAR]; a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374:1351–1363.

8 Saito S., Nakatani T., Kobayashi J., et al. Is extracorporeal life support contraindicated in elderly patients? Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:140–145.

9 Sidebotham D., McGeorge A., McGuinness S., et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for treating severe cardiac and respiratory failure in adults: part 2—technical considerations. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24:164–172.

10 Terragni P.P., Del Sorbo L., Mascia L., et al. Tidal volume lower than 6 ml/kg enhances lung protection. Role of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:826–835.

11 Zapol W.M., Snider M.T., Hill J.D., et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe acute respiratory failure. A randomized prospective study. JAMA. 1979;242:2193–2196.

12 Zapol W.M., Snider M.T., Schneider R.C. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory failure. Anesthesiology. 1977;46:272–285.