Chapter 63 Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of irreversible blindness.1 The disease adversely affects quality of life and activities of daily living, causing many affected individuals to lose their independence in their retirement years. AMD is estimated to affect more than 8 million individuals in the USA;2 the advanced form of the disease affects more than 1.75 million individuals.1 Despite the introduction of new therapies for prevention and treatment of AMD, the prevalence of AMD is expected to increase by 97% by the year 2050.3
The only proven treatment available for the dry or nonexudative forms of this disease, comprising 85% of cases, is an antioxidant/mineral supplement which can slow the progression of the disease by 25% over 5 years.4 For the wet form of the disease, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatments have been very effective in preventing severe vision loss. Still, preventive measures are needed to reduce the burden of this disease. Smoking is the most consistently identified modifiable risk factor.5–6 Obesity, sunlight exposure, and nutritional factors including antioxidants and dietary fat intake may also affect AMD incidence and progression.4,7–14 There has also been great progress in identifying the genetic variants that impact risk of AMD.15–29 The knowledge of genetic risk variants for the disease coupled with knowledge of nongenetic risk factors have improved the ability to predict which patients will develop advanced forms of the disease.23,30–32 Although much progress has been made over the past two decades, finding the causes and mechanisms of this condition remains a challenge.
Classification
It is important for investigators to standardize definitions of a disease and its subtypes to enhance comparability and to promote collaborative efforts. Toward this goal, an international classification and grading system for AMD was recommended, although it is not universally applied.33 In this system age-related maculopathy (ARM) or early AMD is defined as the presence of drusen and RPE irregularities, and the terms late ARM and advanced AMD are limited to the occurrence of geographic atrophy and neovascular disease, the forms most often associated with greater visual loss. Clinical manifestations of AMD can be subcategorized according to the specific type of AMD, which for example can yield a four- or five-step grading system.34–35 The Clinical Age-Related Maculopathy grading System (CARMS)34 is useful for clinical management and genetic epidemiologic research and has been used in several studies.11,13,23,25–27,29,36–39 Alternative and more detailed systems have been used in some of the population-based studies described below.40–41 New subcategories of AMD will evolve as genetic and epidemiologic studies provide further insight into the pathogenesis of this disease. An updated classification under the auspices of the Beckman Initiative for Macular Research is underway.
Prevalence
Prevalence is the total number of cases in the population, divided by the number of individuals in the population. Population-based studies that have provided information on the prevalence of AMD within the USA include the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES),42–43 the Framingham Eye Study (FES),44 the Chesapeake Bay Watermen Study,40 the Beaver Dam Eye Study (BDES),45 the Baltimore Eye Survey,46 and the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project.47 Population-based studies outside the USA include the Rotterdam Study in the Netherlands,48 the Blue Mountains Eye Study (BMES) in Australia,49 the Barbados Eye Study,50 and a study in Italy.51 Prevalence rates are quite variable for all types of AMD combined, because of differences in definitions of AMD, but are more consistent for “advanced AMD.”
The BDES was a census of the population of Beaver Dam, Wisconsin.45 This study found that the early forms are much more common than the late stages of AMD, and both types increase in frequency with increasing age. The prevalence of late AMD was 1.6% overall; exudative maculopathy was present in at least one eye in 1.2% of the population; and geographic atrophy was present in 0.6%. The prevalence of late AMD rose to 7.1% in persons who were 75 or older.
Total prevalence of AMD in the USA was also estimated in 2004 using pooled findings from seven large population-based studies both inside and outside the USA, and applying those prevalence rates to the USA population.1 This meta-analysis by the Eye Diseases Prevalence Group calculated the overall prevalence of neovascular AMD and/or geographic atrophy to be 1.47% of the USA population aged 40 years or older. The most recent NHANES, conducted from 2005 to 2008, sampled approximately 5500 persons.43 The total prevalence of any AMD in this civilian noninstitutionalized USA population aged 40 years or older was 6.5% (7.2 million people), and 809 000 persons were estimated to have the late stage of AMD.43
Studies conducted outside the USA have found similar or lower rates of AMD compared to those conducted inside the USA. In the Rotterdam Study, fundus photographs of 6251 participants aged 55–98 years were reviewed for drusen, pigmentary changes, and atrophic or neovascular AMD.48 The prevalence of AMD was observed to be slightly lower in that study compared with the BDES in Wisconsin. In the BMES in Australia, the authors also found lower prevalence of all lesions related to AMD in each age stratum.49 After adjusting for age, differences were significant for both soft drusen and retinal pigmentary abnormalities; they were lower but not significantly different for geographic atrophy and exudative disease. In a population-based study of 354 participants in rural southern Italy, the prevalence rates of AMD were also lower than those found in the USA.51 Methodological differences between studies may exist, but the lower prevalence rates found in these countries may also reflect genetic or environmental differences compared with the US population.
Incidence
Incidence is a measure of the risk of developing some new condition within a specified period of time. A few studies have been done to evaluate the incidence of AMD. The FES used the age-specific prevalence data to estimate 5-year incidence rates of AMD, according to the definition of AMD in that study. These estimates were 2.5%, 6.7%, and 10.8% for individuals who were 65, 70, and 75 years of age, respectively.52 The BDES determined the 5-year cumulative incidence of developing early and late AMD in a population of 3583 adults (age range 43–86 years).53 Incidence of early AMD increased from 3.9% in individuals aged 43–54 years to 22.8% in persons 75 years of age and older. The overall 5-year incidence of late AMD was 0.9%. Persons 75 years of age or older had a 5.4% incidence rate of late AMD. The Visual Impairment Project of Melbourne, Australia, described the 5-year incidence of early AMD lesions in a population of 3271 participants aged 40 years and older.54 The overall 5-year incidence of AMD was 0.49%, and overall incidence of early AMD was 17.3% in this population. As with the BDES, incidence of AMD increased with age – up to 6.3% for people aged 80 years and older at baseline. The Barbados Eye Study described a 4-year incidence of early macular changes as 5.2% in a black population, with an extremely low incidence of exudative AMD.55 The differences in prevalence and incidence rates by race/ethnicity are discussed below. One report suggests that the incidence of advanced AMD in the USA may be on the decline, possibly due in part to changes in lifestyle habits of the American public over the past 40 years.56
Quality of life
The psychologic costs associated with AMD underscore the growing importance of this disease on the expanding older adult population. For this reason it is important to incorporate a functional component into studies of AMD. Instruments such as the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire and the Macular Disease Dependent Quality of Life Questionnaire have been used in AMD studies.57–58 Patients with visual loss resulting from AMD often report AMD as their worst medical problem and have a diminished quality of life.59–60 More recently in one study of well-being, patients with AMD had lower scores than patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS); the lower quality of life in patients with AMD was related to greater emotional distress, worse self-reported general health, and greater difficulty carrying out daily activities. Not only is AMD associated with a higher rate of depression in the community-dwelling adult population when compared to the unaffected adult population,61–62 but depression also exacerbates the effects of AMD.63
Sociodemographic risk factors
Age
All studies demonstrate that the prevalence, incidence, and progression of all forms of AMD rise steeply with increasing age. There was a 17-fold increased risk of AMD comparing the oldest to the youngest age group in the Framingham Study.44 In the Watermen Study, the prevalence of moderate to advanced AMD doubled with each decade after age 60.40 In the BDES, approximately 30% of individuals 75 years of age or older had early AMD; of the remainder, 23% developed early AMD within 5 years.45,53By age 75 years and older in that study, 7.1% had late AMD, compared with 0.1% in the age group 43–54 years and 0.6% among persons aged 55–64 years. Pooled data in a prevalence paper showed similar rates, with dramatic increases in rates for both men and women older than 80 years.1
Gender
Several studies1,44–45,48 have shown no overall difference in the frequency of AMD between men and women, after controlling for age. However, in NHANES III, men, regardless of race and age, had a lower prevalence of AMD than women.42 Incidence rates within the Beaver Dam population also suggest a gender difference. After adjusting for age, women aged 75 years or older had approximately twice the incidence of early AMD compared with men.53 A study using reported incidence of exudative AMD in the USA among Medicare beneficiaries supported the Beaver Dam results.64 In the BMES, there were consistent, though not significant, gender differences in prevalence for most lesions of AMD, with women having higher rates for soft, indistinct drusen, but not for retinal pigmentary abnormalities.49 A case–control study in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) also found women had a higher risk for intermediate drusen.65 Residual confounding by age in the broad age category “75 and older” may partially explain the differences between studies since there are more women than men in that age group. Additional research is needed, however, to assess these associations.
Race/ethnicity
Ophthalmologists observe visual loss caused by CNV less frequently among US ethnic minority groups compared with Caucasians. In the Baltimore Eye Survey, AMD accounted for 30% of bilateral blindness among whites and for 0% among African Americans.66 Data from a population-based study of blacks in Barbados, West Indies,50,55 revealed that incidence of AMD and signs of AMD changes occurred commonly but at a lower frequency than in predominantly white populations in other studies. Hispanics also have a lower prevalence of advanced AMD than non-Hispanics. Late-stage AMD was significantly less frequent among Hispanics vs. non-Hispanic whites in Beaver Dam (OR = 0.07; 95% CI = 0.01–0.49).67 The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study indicates Latinos have a relatively high rate of early AMD but not late AMD.68 Among persons aged 40–79 years, the age-specific prevalence of late AMD in Asians was comparable with that reported from white populations, but early AMD signs were less common among Asians.69
Socioeconomic status
Less education and lower income have been shown to be related to increased morbidity and mortality from a number of diseases,70 and there are mixed findings for AMD. The Eye Disease Case Control Study (EDCCS), a National Eye Institute-sponsored multicenter study, was designed to study risk factors for several types of maculopathy, including neovascular AMD.71 Persons with higher levels of education had a slightly reduced risk of neovascular AMD, but the association did not remain statistically significant after multivariate modeling.71 Education was also inversely related to AMD in case–control and prospective studies based on the AREDS population even in multivariate analyses.30,65 In the BDES, no association was found between education, income, employment status, or marital status and maculopathy.72 Furthermore, no associations were noted in another case–control study73 or in the FES,44 although different definitions of macular degeneration were used in those reports, compared with the more recent studies. It is possible that education is a surrogate marker for behaviors and lifestyles related to AMD.
Ocular risk factors
Refractive error
Several case–control studies have shown an association between AMD and hyperopia.65,71,73–75 The potential problem with some of these studies is the clinical setting in which they were conducted. Because ophthalmology practices tend to contain a disproportionate number of myopic patients, controls selected from such practices would tend to have a higher prevalence of myopia than that of the general population. Population-based data from the BMES, less likely to have such potential bias, has also suggested a weak association between hyperopia and early AMD, but not late AMD.76 The population-based Rotterdam Study also showed an association between hyperopia and both incident and prevalent AMD.77 This association, therefore, might implicate structural and mechanical differences that render some eyes predisposed to maculopathy.78
Iris color
Higher levels of ocular melanin may be protective against light-induced oxidative damage to the retina, since melanin can act as a free radical scavenger and may have an antiangiogenesis function. To date, the literature is inconclusive about the relationship between iris color and AMD. Darker irides have been found to be protective in some studies73,79–83 but not in others.71,84–88 Differences between studies may be partly related to the use of different definitions of disease, different number and types of other factors evaluated simultaneously, and residual confounding by ethnicity in some studies.
Lens opacities, cataracts, and cataract surgery
Data regarding the relationship between cataracts and AMD are inconsistent. FES investigators found no relationship,89 whereas data from the NHANES did support a relationship between AMD and lens opacities.90 In the BDES, in which photographs of the lens and macula were graded, nuclear sclerosis was associated with increased odds of early AMD (OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.3–3.0) but not of late AMD. Neither cortical nor posterior subcapsular cataracts were related to AMD.91 A case–control study of 1844 cases and 1844 controls indicated that lens opacities or cataract surgery were associated with an increased risk of AMD.74
Although AMD-affected individuals reported better visual function and quality of life after cataract surgery,92 a history of cataract surgery has been found to be associated with an increased risk for advanced AMD in some earlier studies.93 Investigators have postulated that this association might arise because the cataractous lens can block damaging ultraviolet light. Inflammatory changes after cataract surgery may also cause progression of early to late AMD. In the BDES, previous cataract surgery at baseline was associated with a statistically significant increased risk for progression of AMD (OR 2.7) and for development of late AMD (OR 2.8; 95% CI 1.03–7.6).85 In more recent prospective studies, however, including the large AREDS study cohort, there was no evidence to support a higher rate of progression of AMD in patients who underwent cataract surgery.94–95
Cup-to-disc ratio
The EDCCS demonstrated that eyes with larger cup-to-disc ratios had a reduced risk of exudative AMD. This effect persisted even after multivariate modeling,71 adjusting for known and potential confounding factors. Whether this finding, which is consistent with the association between AMD and hyperopic refractive error mentioned earlier, is meaningful in terms of the mechanisms associated with the development of AMD awaits further study.
Behavioral and lifestyle factors
Smoking
The preponderance of epidemiologic evidence indicates a strong positive association between both wet and dry AMD and smoking. Two large prospective cohort studies have evaluated the relationship between smoking and wet AMD and dry AMD associated with visual loss.5,96 Seddon et al. reported that women in the Nurses’ Health Study who currently smoked 25 or more cigarettes per day had a relative risk (RR) of 2.4 (95% CI 1.4–4), and women who were past smokers had an RR of 2.0 (95% CI 1.2–3.4) for developing AMD compared with women who never smoked.5 There was a dose–response relationship between AMD and pack-years of smoking, and risk remained elevated for many years after smoking cessation. Results were consistent for various definitions of AMD, including wet AMD and dry AMD, with different levels of visual loss, and for different definitions of smoking. It was estimated that 29% of the AMD cases in that study could be attributable to smoking.5 These results were supported by a study among men participating in the Physicians’ Health Study.96 Several other studies have also shown an increased risk for AMD among smokers.65,97–99 Smoking is an important, independent, modifiable risk factor for AMD.
Mechanisms by which smoking may increase the risk of developing AMD include its adverse effect on blood lipids by decreasing levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and increasing platelet aggregability and fibrinogen, increasing oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation, and reducing plasma levels of antioxidants.5 In animal models, nicotine has been shown to increase the size and severity of experimental CNV, suggesting that non-neuronal nicotinic receptors may also play a part in the effect of smoking on advanced AMD.100 Statistical interactions between smoking and either the Complement Factor H (CFH) Y402H or ARMS2/HTRA1 genotypes have not been confirmed (see “Genetics factors” below).101–102
Antioxidants, vitamins, and minerals
The role of antioxidant vitamins in the pathogenesis of AMD has received a great deal of attention. Antioxidants, which include vitamin C (ascorbic acid), vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol), and the carotenoids (including alpha-carotene, beta-carotene, cryptoxanthin, lutein, and zeaxanthin), may be relevant to AMD because of their physiologic functions and the location of some of these nutrients in the retina. Lutein and zeaxanthin, in particular, are associated with macular pigment.103–105 Trace minerals such as zinc, selenium, copper, and manganese may also be involved in antioxidant functions of the retina. Antioxidants could prevent oxidative damage to the retina, which could in turn prevent development of AMD.10,106 Damage to retinal photoreceptor cells could be caused by photo-oxidation or by free radical-induced lipid peroxidation.107–108 This could lead to impaired function of the RPE and eventually to degeneration involving the macula. The deposit of oxidized compounds in healthy tissue may result in cell death because they are indigestible by cellular enzymes.108–109 Antioxidants may scavenge, decompose, or reduce the formation of harmful compounds.
The AREDS confirmed that antioxidant and zinc supplementation can decrease the risk of AMD progression and vision loss.4 This study included a double-blind clinical trial in 11 centers around the USA, randomly assigning 3640 participants to take daily oral supplements of antioxidants, zinc, antioxidants and zinc, or placebo. Both zinc alone and antioxidants and zinc together significantly reduced the odds of developing advanced AMD in participants with intermediate signs of AMD (see Chapter 65, Age-related macular degeneration: Non-neovascular early AMD, intermediate AMD, and geographic atrophy) in at least one eye. The zinc supplement included zinc (80 mg) as zinc oxide, and copper (2 mg) as cupric oxide; the antioxidant supplement included vitamin C (500 mg), vitamin E (400 IU), and beta-carotene (15 mg). If the AREDS formulation were used to treat the 8 million individuals in the USA who are at increased risk for developing advanced AMD, the AREDS group authors estimate that more than 300,000 would avoid advanced AMD and the associated vision loss during the next 5 years.2 AREDS-type supplements are a cost-effective way of reducing visual loss due to the progression of AMD.110 The effect of dietary antioxidants on the incidence of early AMD has not been established and there are questions about the effect of beta-carotene supplements on AMD since there is none in the retina, and high doses of zinc could have side-effects.
Diets high in antioxidant-rich fruits and vegetables may be related to a lower risk of exudative AMD. The first study launched to evaluate diet and AMD, the Dietary Intake Study, ancillary to the EDCCS, showed an inverse association between exudative AMD and dietary intake of carotenoids from foods.10 In that study reported in 1994, a diet rich in green leafy vegetables containing the carotenoids lutein and zeaxanthin was associated with a reduction in the risk of exudative AMD. Intake of 6 mg of lutein per day was associated with a significant 43% reduction in risk of AMD.10 A prospective double-masked study involving lutein and antioxidant supplementation in a group of 90 individuals showed that visual function was improved with 10 mg of lutein or a lutein/antioxidant formula.111 In a British study of 380 men and women, lower plasma levels of zeaxanthin were also found to be associated with an increased risk of AMD.112 A cross-sectional study using previously collected NHANES I data found a weak protective effect with increased consumption of fruits and vegetables rich in vitamin A.113 A prospective follow-up study has shown that fruit intake is inversely associated with exudative AMD. Participants who consumed three or more servings of fresh fruit per day have an RR of 0.64 (95% CI 0.44–0.93) compared to those who consumed less than 1.5 servings per day.7 The early evidence regarding lutein was recently supported by analyses of diet data from AREDS.114 AREDS2, an ongoing trial of lutein, zeaxanthin, and omega 3 fatty acids and assessment of omission of beta-carotene and use of much lower doses of zinc for the prevention of AMD progression, may provide additional data regarding optimal vitamin supplement regimens for AMD patients.
Alcohol intake
Studies that have examined the relationship between AMD and alcohol consumption have yielded mixed results. In the EDCCS, no significant relationship between alcohol intake and exudative AMD was noted in univariate analyses,71 but an inverse association could not be ruled out in multivariate analyses. Another case–control study found a suggestion of a nonlinear trend with higher risk of AMD in persons who had five drinks or more per day and a lower risk in persons who had one or two drinks per day compared with nondrinkers.115 In a case–control study using NHANES I data, moderate wine consumption was associated with a decreased risk of developing AMD, although the analysis did not control for the potential confounding effects of smoking.116 In a large prospective study, no support was found for a protective association between moderate alcohol consumption and risk of AMD, although there was a suggestion of a modest increased risk of AMD in heavier drinkers.117 The BDES found heavy drinkers were more likely to develop late AMD,98 whereas the BMES found an increased risk of early AMD only in current spirits drinkers.118 The evidence to date suggests that alcohol intake does not have a large effect on the development of AMD.
Obesity and physical activity
There is an association between AMD and overall obesity13,119–122 and abdominal adiposity.13 In a prospective cohort study of 261 individuals with some sign of nonadvanced AMD in at least one eye,13 individuals with a body mass index (BMI) between 25 and 29 had an RR of 2.32 (95% CI 1.32–4.07) for progression to advanced AMD when compared to those with a BMI of less than 25. Those with a BMI of at least 30 had an RR of 2.35 (95% CI 1.27–4.34) compared to the lowest category (BMI <25), after controlling for other factors. Similarly, the highest tertile of waist circumference had a twofold increased risk compared to the lowest tertile, and the highest tertile of waist-to-hip ratio had an RR of 1.84 compared to the lowest tertile. Thus, both overall and abdominal obesity were related to AMD progression. Vigorous physical activity three times a week reduced the risk of AMD progression by 25% compared to no physical activity.13 Obesity and physical activity are modifiable factors that may alter an individual’s risk of AMD incidence and progression. In one study, the susceptibility to advanced AMD associated with CFH Y402H was modified by body mass index (BMI), and both higher BMI and current and past smoking increased risk of advanced AMD within the same genotype category (see “Genetics factors” below).101
Sunlight exposure
The literature to date regarding the association between sunlight exposure and AMD is conflicting. Overall, the data do not support a strong association between ultraviolet radiation exposure and risk of AMD, although a small effect cannot be ruled out. In the BDES,123 increased time spent outdoors in the summer was associated with a twofold increased risk of advanced AMD. The 5-year124 and 10-year125 incidence of early AMD in the BDES confirmed this association, although the 10-year incidence study showed few significant associations between environmental light and incidence and progression of early AMD. The EDCCS71 and the Pathologies Oculaires Liées à l’Age (POLA) study in France126 showed no significant association between advanced AMD and sunlight exposure. Sensitivity to sunburn may also be a risk factor. An Australian case–control study noted an association between sun-sensitive skin and risk of neovascular AMD.127 Conflicting results in these studies exemplify the difficulties encountered when studying this complex exposure. These include challenges in measuring acute and chronic lifetime exposure and the effect of potential confounding variables, such as sun sensitivity and sun avoidance behaviors. Furthermore, studies have evaluated different populations with different stages of AMD and people with varying intensity of exposures.
Medications
The use of certain medications may be associated with AMD, although studies have yielded mixed results. Some studies have shown borderline statistically significant associations between increased risk of early AMD with use of antihypertensive medication, especially beta-blockers.128 Other studies have shown a decreased rate of CNV among AMD patients taking aspirin129 or cholesterol-lowering drugs such as statins.129–130 The prospective Rotterdam Study, however, did not find a relationship between cholesterol-lowering drugs and risk of AMD.131 The use of statins, in particular, may be associated with decreased CNV because of their anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties.132 Increased levels of C-reactive protein in patients with AMD have implicated a role for inflammation in the pathophysiology of the disease,133 and it may be the anti-inflammatory effects of statins that affect risk, rather than the medication’s cholesterol-lowering effect. The potential link between anticholesterol medications is more intriguing given the recent finding that the lipase C (LIPC) gene, a gene that influences high density lipoprotein (HDL) level, and other genes involved in cholesterol pathways, including cholesterylester transfer protein (CETP), are associated with AMD.27–28 The effects of hormone replacement therapy and AMD are discussed below, in the section on hormonal and reproductive factors.
Cardiovascular-related factors
Cardiovascular diseases
It is important to study possible cardiovascular risk factors not only to understand the epidemiology of AMD, but also because anti-VEGF therapies have associated cardiovascular risks. Some studies have suggested an association between AMD and clinical manifestations of cardiovascular disease (CVD).134–137 The presence of atherosclerotic lesions, determined by ultrasound, was examined in relation to risk of macular degeneration in a large population-based study conducted in the Netherlands.137 Results obtained from this cross-sectional study showed a 4.5-fold increased risk of late AMD (defined as geographic atrophy or neovascular macular degeneration) associated with plaques in the carotid bifurcation and a twofold increased risk associated with plaques in the common carotid artery. Lower-extremity arterial disease (as measured by the ratio of the systolic blood pressure (SBP) level of the ankle to the SBP of the arm) was also associated with a 2.5-times increased risk of AMD.
In addition, a case–control study found a relationship between AMD and a history of one or more CVDs.73 The NHANES I study reported a positive association between AMD and cerebrovascular disease, but positive associations with other vascular diseases did not reach statistical significance.113 A Finnish study reported a significant correlation between occurrence of AMD and the severity of retinal arteriosclerosis.138 However, other studies found that individuals who reported a history of cerebrovascular disease did not have a significantly greater risk of AMD.71,97,139 On the other hand, many CVD risk factors are associated with AMD.
Blood pressure and hypertension
The role of blood pressure in the etiology of AMD remains unclear. There was a small and consistent statistically significant relationship between AMD and systemic hypertension in two cross-sectional population-based studies.113,140 A case–control study found that individuals with AMD were significantly more likely to be taking antihypertensive medication.141 Also, a significant relationship was found between AMD and diastolic blood pressure measured several years before the eye examination in the FES142 and in a small Israeli study.143 The BDES reported that SBP was associated with incidence of RPE depigmentation,144 10-year incidence of advanced AMD lesions, and progression of AMD.134 That study has also shown that arteriovenous nicking, a retinal vascular characteristic associated with hypertension, is associated with an increased incidence of AMD.145 The Rotterdam Study showed a relationship between elevated SBP and incidence of AMD.136 In the Macular Photocoagulation Study, there was an increased incidence of exudative AMD associated with hypertension in the second eye of individuals with exudative AMD in one eye at baseline (RR 1.7; 95% CI 1.2–2.4).146 In another case–control study, dry AMD was not associated with hypertension, but exudative AMD was significantly associated with both hypertension and antihypertensive medication use.128 In a study evaluating lipid biomarkers and the hepatic lipase gene, there was a higher risk of advanced AMD for hypertension defined as over 160 mmHg systolic or 100 mmHg diastolic (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1–6.0) compared with normal levels.147 Other cross-sectional97,137,148 and case–control studies,71as well as one prospective study139 (in which duration of hypertension was not taken into account) did not show an increased risk of AMD associated with current hypertension or systolic or diastolic blood pressure. Evidence suggests a possible mild to moderate association between elevated blood pressure and AMD. Assessment of this relationship could be enhanced by evaluating the duration of hypertension and its subsequent effects on onset and progression of maculopathy in large study populations with a sufficient number of subjects with advanced stages of AMD.
Cholesterol levels and dietary fat intake
There is some evidence linking cholesterol level to AMD, but not all results are consistent. The EDCCS reported a statistically significant fourfold increased risk of exudative AMD associated with the highest serum cholesterol level (>4.88 mmol/l) and a twofold increased risk in the middle-cholesterol-level group, compared with the lowest-cholesterol-level group, controlling for other factors.71 A positive association was found between risk of AMD and increasing HDL levels in both the population-based POLA study120 and the Rotterdam Study.149 A case–control study showed that higher HDL cholesterol levels tended to reduce the risk of AMD.147 The BDES found that early AMD was related to low total serum cholesterol levels in women and men older than 75. Furthermore, men with early AMD had higher HDL and lower total cholesterol-to-HDL ratios.97,144 Slightly, but not significantly, increased risk of wet AMD was seen with increasing triglyceride level in the EDCCS.71 This finding was not seen in the Rotterdam Study137 or the BDES97 (both of which had small numbers of exudative AMD cases and therefore limited power).
The genes involved in the HDL cholesterol pathway that have been associated with AMD have had discordant effects between the HDL-increasing alleles and the protective or risk effects for AMD. An HDL-raising allele of the LIPC gene was associated with a reduced risk of AMD whereas an HDL-increasing allele of CETP increased risk for AMD.27–28 Furthermore, in one study, mean HDL level was lower in advanced AMD cases compared with controls, and this association was independent of LIPC genotype.147 In turn, LIPC genotype was associated with advanced AMD independent of HDL level and other factors including dietary lutein, smoking, BMI, and genotypes at other established AMD genes.147 The mechanisms through which genetic variants in the HDL cholesterol pathway exert their effect on AMD risk require further investigation.
An association between dietary fat intake and AMD was first reported in 1994.14 Dietary fat intake was associated with an elevated risk of exudative AMD in the Dietary Ancillary Study of EDCCS.12 This association was primarily caused by vegetable fat rather than animal fat. An inverse, protective association was found for higher consumption of docosahexaenoic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid omega-3 fatty acids in the multivariate model.12 Also reported were positive associations between risk of AMD and total fat, vegetable, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fats and linoleic acid.12 All of these relationships were strengthened in a prospective longitudinal study of progression to advanced forms of AMD.11 A high intake of fish and omega-3 fatty acids reduced the risk when linoleic acid intake was low.11,12 Prospective data from participants in the Women’s Health Study confirmed that regular consumption of omega-3 fatty acids and fish was beneficial and they were associated with significantly decreased risk of incident early AMD.150 Nuts have also been shown to decrease the risk of AMD progression.11 In the BDES, individuals with greater saturated fat and cholesterol intake also had increased risk for early AMD.151 However, no relationship was found between AMD and dietary fat intake in NHANES III.152 Recent analyses of dietary data from AREDS support the previous observations of a beneficial effect of higher intake of omega-3 fatty acids.153
In summary, serum cholesterol levels may be related to exudative AMD, and the relationship with dietary fat is more consistent. The mechanisms through which variants in HDL-related genes affect AMD risk is not simply through their influence on serum HDL level. Dissection of the mechanisms through which HDL mediates AMD risk may illuminate additional treatment strategies. The consistent association between AMD and dietary fat and the possible association with cholesterol intake may indicate a relationship with atherosclerosis.135,154
Diabetes and hyperglycemia
Many studies have investigated the relationship between diabetes and/or hyperglycemia and AMD, and most have found no significant relationships. Only a few studies suggested a possible positive association.42,155 One difficulty with these studies is the uncertainty of diagnosing AMD in the presence of diabetic retinopathy. Also, many studies of AMD exclude persons with diabetic retinopathy. This could result in attenuated relationships between AMD and diabetes in published studies.
Hormonal and reproductive factors
There is evidence to support a small protective effect of hormone therapy on AMD,71,156–157 but associations with pregnancies71,158 or menopause158,159 are more mixed. The EDCCS showed a marked decrease in the risk of neovascular AMD among postmenopausal women who used estrogen therapy,71 as did a cross-sectional study.156 No relationship was found in the BDES between years of estrogen therapy and exudative AMD (OR 0.9 (per 1 year of therapy); 95% CI 0.8–1.1) or any of the less severe forms of AMD among women.158 However, this study had limited power to detect a potential effect of estrogen therapy on advanced AMD. The POLA study did not show an association between AMD and hormone therapy, hysterectomy, or oophorectomy.160 Some studies,161–162 including the BMES,159 reported no relationship between AMD and hormone replacement therapy or early menopause. However, the BMES did describe a small but significant decrease in risk of early AMD with increasing number of years between menarche and menopause. The evidence is sparse, but a protective effect of estrogen on AMD is possible and potentially important, and further research is warranted.
Inflammatory factors
Studies have suggested that inflammation plays a role in the pathogenesis of drusen and AMD.133,135,163–165 Examination of tissue samples has shown that “cellular debris” from RPE cells becomes trapped in the RPE basal lamina and Bruch’s membrane, potentially causing a chronic inflammatory response which may prompt drusen formation.163 Drusen contain proteins that are associated with chronic and acute inflammatory responses164 and other age-related diseases, including amyloid P component and complement proteins.165 Inflammation is also associated with angiogenesis and may play a role in the neovascularization seen in the advanced forms of AMD.
A study of 930 individuals has shown that serum levels of the systemic inflammatory marker, C-reactive protein, are significantly elevated in individuals with advanced AMD.133 This study showed that, after adjusting for variables such as age, gender, BMI, and smoking, the odds ratio for AMD comparing the highest and lowest quartiles of C-reactive protein was 1.65 (95% CI 1.07–2.55, P for trend = 0.02). In stratified analyses, the highest levels of C-reactive protein were associated with a twofold increased risk among both smokers and nonsmokers. High-sensitivity CRP and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the CFH gene are independently associated with risk of AMD in the Age Related Eye Disease Ancillary Study. Higher C-reactive protein level tends to confer a higher risk of AMD within most genotype groups.166 These elevated levels suggest that reducing inflammation may slow the progression of AMD. Some studies raise the possibility that medications with anti-inflammatory properties, such as statins129–130, 132 and triamcinolone,167 may be beneficial.
The existence of multiple, complement-related AMD risk alleles has lent further support to the inflammatory pathogenesis theory for AMD and shed light on the role of uncontrolled alternative complement pathway activation in this disease (see “Genetic factors” below). CFH inhibits the alternative complement pathway by blocking formation of and accelerating the decay of alternative pathway C3 convertases; it also serves as a cofactor for the Factor-1-mediated cleavage and inactivation of C3b.168 The Y402H SNP is within the CFH binding site for heparin and C-reactive protein. Binding to these sites increases the affinity of CFH for C3b, which in turn increases the ability of CFH to inhibit complement’s effects.
As a result of the complement-related genetic discoveries, various complement-modulating agents are currently in clinical trials for the treatment of AMD.169 Phase 1 clinical trials examining intravitreal compstatin/POT-4, a C3 inhibitor, in the treatment of wet AMD have been completed, and trials for dry AMD are underway. Systemic administration of the anti-C5 antibody, eculizumab, is being investigated for geographic atrophy. Intravitreal use of ARC1905, a C5 inhibitor, is being examined for the treatment of both dry and wet AMD in phase 1 clinical trials. An intravitreal antibody against Complement Factor D has also completed phase 1 clinical trials for geographic atrophy.
Genetic factors
AMD is a common, polygenic disease in which multiple genetic variants, each adding a small to moderate amount of increased risk, contribute to disease in addition to environmental factors.170 The risk of developing the disease is threefold higher in people who have a family member with AMD than in those without a first-degree relative with AMD.171–72 Since 2005, several genetic variants have been consistently associated with AMD. The common coding variant Y402H in the CFH gene was the first; the odds ratio associated with being homozygous for the risk variant for all categories of AMD is estimated to be between 2.45 and 3.33.15–18,23,39,173 The odds ratios are higher, between 3.5 and 7.4, for advanced dry and wet forms of AMD. Several other genes in the alternative complement cascade have also been consistently shown to impact AMD risk. These include another variant in CFH,23 Factor B (BF)/Complement Component 2 (C2),22–3 Complement Component 3 (C3),24–5 and Complement Factor I (CFI).26
Several genes not involved in the complement cascade have also been implicated. Variation in the ARMS2/HTRA1 locus on chromosome 10 has been convincingly associated with AMD with an effect size similar to or greater than that of CFH.19–21,174 The function of this gene is not completely understood but there is evidence that it confers greater risk for wet AMD as compared with geographic atrophy.175 LIPC and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 (TIMP3) were associated with AMD in large genome-wide association studies.27–28 LIPC is involved in HDL cholesterol metabolism and TIMP3 is implicated in a Mendelian, early-onset form of macular degeneration, Sorsby’s fundus dystrophy.176 Most recently, new variants near the collagen type X alpha 1 precursor/fyn related kinase (COL10A1/FRK) genes and in VEGFA were discovered to be associated with advanced AMD,29 supporting the previous association noted with the gene COL8A127 and emphasizing the importance of extracellular matrix biology and angiogenesis in AMD.29 The genetic variants discovered to date explain about half of the classical sibling risk of AMD, and commercial genetic testing for some AMD risk variants is currently available. Knowledge of genetic variation at risk loci increases the ability to predict AMD progression above and beyond knowledge of demographics, ocular factors, smoking history, and BMI.31–32 However, there is no consensus yet on how genetic testing should be integrated into clinical practice. Further validation of genetic testing for predicting AMD development and progression will occur as additional genetic risk variants are discovered. Eventually, genotyping may become a useful tool for identifying individuals who are at higher risk for disease and thus may benefit from more intense monitoring and/or preventive treatment strategies and may help with designing clinical trials.32
A few pharmacogenetic studies have been published to date. These focus mainly on the association of the CFH and/or ARMS2/HTRA1 polymorphisms to patients’ responses to either anti-VEGF therapy, photodynamic therapy (PDT), or antioxidant supplements. One retrospective cohort study found that patients witht the CFH Y204H CC genotype had worse visual outcomes with intravitreal bevacizumab than did those with the CFH TC and TT genotypes; they found no pharmacogenetic relationship with ARMS2/HTRA1.177 This relationship between CFH genotype and poorer visual acuity outcomes with intravitreal bevacizumab was corroborated by a prospective study.178 Another retrospective study looking only at CFH locus found that patients who were homozygous for the Y402H risk allele have a 37% significantly higher risk of requiring additional intravitreal ranibizumab injections.179 In a retrospective analysis of the interaction between CFH and ARMS2/HTRA1 variants and treatment response to antioxidants and zinc, an interaction between CFH Y402H genotype and supplementation with antioxidants plus zinc and zinc alone was observed.31,180 There were no significant treatment interactions with ARMS2/HTRA1. The association between CFH and ARMS2/HTRA1 variants and response to PDT are mixed with some studies showing association to CFH only,181 other studies showing no association to CFH,182–183 and one study in an Asian population showing an association to both.184 Results from several well-powered, ongoing pharmacogenetic studies are needed to clarify whether genetic make-up influences response to treatment in AMD.
Conclusion
AMD is a multifactorial disease that affects a large segment of the population and research to date has yielded some preventive measures and a few effective treatments for the advanced wet form of the disease. Several modifiable risk factors have been identified, including smoking, dietary intake of omega-3 fatty acids and vegetables and fruit with antioxidants including lutein and zeaxanthin, as well as, exercise, and maintaining a healthy weight. Population-based studies have shown mixed effects of sunlight exposure, medication use, and alcohol intake. The understanding of the genetic architecture of AMD has increased significantly over the past decade and underscores the roles of inflammation, HDL cholesterol metabolism, angiogenesis and degradation of extracellular matrix in the etiology of this disease. Discovery of a rare, penetrant, pathogenic mutation in the CFH gene,185 which causes earlier onset age-related macular degeneration, points the way for future genetic studies of this disease.
1 Friedman DS, O’Colmain BJ, Munoz B, et al. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:564–572.
2 Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Congdon NG, et al. Potential public health impact of Age-Related Eye Disease Study results: AREDS report no. 11. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:1621–1624.
3 Rein DB, Wittenborn JS, Zhang X, et al. Forecasting age-related macular degeneration through the year 2050: the potential impact of new treatments. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:533–540.
4 AREDS Research Study Group. A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of high-dose supplementation with vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc for age-related macular degeneration and vision loss: AREDS report no. 8. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1417–1436.
5 Seddon JM, Willett WC, Speizer FE, et al. A prospective study of cigarette smoking and age-related macular degeneration in women. JAMA. 1996;276:1141–1146.
6 Tomany SC, Wang JJ, Van Leeuwen R, et al. Risk factors for incident age-related macular degeneration: pooled findings from 3 continents. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1280–1287.
7 Cho E, Seddon JM, Rosner B, et al. Prospective study of intake of fruits, vegetables, vitamins, and carotenoids and risk of age-related maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:883–892.
8 Antioxidant status and neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Eye Disease Case-Control Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:104–109.
9 Mares-Perlman JA, Brady WE, Klein R, et al. Serum antioxidants and age-related macular degeneration in a population-based case-control study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:1518–1523.
10 Seddon JM, Ajani UA, Sperduto RD, et al. Dietary carotenoids, vitamins A, C, and E, and advanced age-related macular degeneration. Eye Disease Case-Control Study Group. JAMA. 1994;272:1413–1420.
11 Seddon JM, Cote J, Rosner B. Progression of age-related macular degeneration: association with dietary fat, transunsaturated fat, nuts, and fish intake. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:1728–1737.
12 Seddon JM, Rosner B, Sperduto RD, et al. Dietary fat and risk for advanced age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1191–1199.
13 Seddon JM, Cote J, Davis N, et al. Progression of age-related macular degeneration: association with body mass index, waist circumference, and waist–hip ratio. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:785–792.
14 Seddon J, et al. Dietary fat intake and age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 35, 1994. ARVO abstract 2003
15 Klein RJ, Zeiss C, Chew EY, et al. Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2005;308:385–389.
16 Edwards AO, Ritter R, 3rd., Abel KJ, et al. Complement factor H polymorphism and age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2005;308:421–424.
17 Haines JL, Hauser MA, Schmidt S, et al. Complement factor H variant increases the risk of age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2005;308:419–421.
18 Hageman GS, Anderson DH, Johnson LV, et al. A common haplotype in the complement regulatory gene factor H (HF1/CFH) predisposes individuals to age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:7227–7232.
19 Rivera A, Fisher SA, Fritsche LG, et al. Hypothetical LOC387715 is a second major susceptibility gene for age-related macular degeneration, contributing independently of complement factor H to disease risk. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:3227–3236.
20 Dewan A, Liu M, Hartman S, et al. HTRA1 promoter polymorphism in wet age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2006;314:989–992.
21 Yang Z, Camp NJ, Sun H, et al. A variant of the HTRA1 gene increases susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2006;314:992–993.
22 Gold B, Merriam JE, Zernant J, et al. Variation in factor B (BF) and complement component 2 (C2) genes is associated with age-related macular degeneration. Nat Genet. 2006;38:458–462.
23 Maller J, George S, Purcell S, et al. Common variation in three genes, including a noncoding variant in CFH, strongly influences risk of age-related macular degeneration. Nat Genet. 2006;38:1055–1059.
24 Yates JR, Sepp T, Matharu BK, et al. Complement C3 variant and the risk of age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:553–561.
25 Maller JB, Fagerness JA, Reynolds RC, et al. Variation in complement factor 3 is associated with risk of age-related macular degeneration. Nat Genet. 2007;39:1200–1201.
26 Fagerness JA, Maller JB, Neale BM, et al. Variation near complement factor I is associated with risk of advanced AMD. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17:100–104.
27 Neale BM, Fagerness J, Reynolds R, et al. Genome-wide association study of advanced age-related macular degeneration identifies a role of the hepatic lipase gene (LIPC). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:7395–7400.
28 Chen W, Stambolian D, Edwards AO, et al. Genetic variants near TIMP3 and high-density lipoprotein-associated loci influence susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:7401–7406.
29 Yu Y, Bhangale T, Fagerness J, et al. Common variants near FRK/COL10A1 and VEGFA are associated with advanced age-related macular degeneration. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(18):3699–3709.
30 Seddon JM, Francis PJ, George S, et al. Association of CFH Y402H and LOC387715 A69S with progression of age-related macular degeneration. JAMA. 2007;297:1793–1800.
31 Seddon JM, Reynolds R, Maller J, et al. Prediction model for prevalence and incidence of advanced age-related macular degeneration based on genetic, demographic, and environmental variables. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:2044–2053.
32 Seddon JM, Reynolds R, Yu Y, et al. Risk models for progression to advanced age-related macular degeneration using demographic, environmental, genetic and ocular factors. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(11):2203–2211.
33 Bird AC, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, et al. An international classification and grading system for age-related maculopathy and age-related macular degeneration. The International ARM Epidemiological Study Group. Surv Ophthalmol. 1995;39:367–374.
34 Seddon JM, Sharma S, Adelman RA. Evaluation of the clinical age-related maculopathy staging system. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:260–266.
35 The Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS): design implications. AREDS report no. 1. Control Clin Trials. 1999;20:573–600.
36 Seddon JM, Santangelo SL, Book K, et al. A genomewide scan for age-related macular degeneration provides evidence for linkage to several chromosomal regions. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73:780–790.
37 Sobrin L, Reynolds R, Yu Y, et al. ARMS2/HTRA1 Locus can confer differential susceptibility to the advanced subtypes of age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;151:345–352.
38 Sobrin L, Maller JB, Neale BM, et al. Genetic profile for five common variants associated with age-related macular degeneration in densely affected families: a novel analytic approach. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010;18:496–501.
39 Raychaudhuri S, Ripke S, Li M, et al. Associations of CFHR1-CFHR3 deletion and a CFH SNP to age-related macular degeneration are not independent. Nat Genet. 2010;42:553–555.
40 Bressler NM, Bressler SB, West SK, et al. The grading and prevalence of macular degeneration in Chesapeake Bay watermen. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:847–852.
41 Klein R, Davis MD, Magli YL, et al. The Wisconsin age-related maculopathy grading system. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:1128–1134.
42 Klein R, Rowland ML, Harris MI. Racial/ethnic differences in age-related maculopathy. Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:371–381.
43 Klein R, Chou CF, Klein BE, et al. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the US population. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129:75–80.
44 Leibowitz HM, Krueger DE, Maunder LR, et al. The Framingham Eye Study monograph: An ophthalmological and epidemiological study of cataract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, macular degeneration, and visual acuity in a general population of 2631 adults, 1973–1975. Surv Ophthalmol. 1980;24:335–610.
45 Klein R, Klein BE, Linton KL. Prevalence of age-related maculopathy. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:933–943.
46 Friedman DS, Katz J, Bressler NM, et al. Racial differences in the prevalence of age-related macular degeneration: the Baltimore Eye Survey. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:1049–1055.
47 West SK, Munoz B, Rubin GS, et al. Function and visual impairment in a population-based study of older adults. The SEE project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:72–82.
48 Vingerling JR, Dielemans I, Hofman A, et al. The prevalence of age-related maculopathy in the Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:205–210.
49 Mitchell P, Smith W, Attebo K, et al. Prevalence of age-related maculopathy in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1450–1460.
50 Schachat AP, Hyman L, Leske MC, et al. Features of age-related macular degeneration in a black population. The Barbados Eye Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:728–735.
51 Pagliarini S, Moramarco A, Wormald RP, et al. Age-related macular disease in rural southern Italy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:616–622.
52 Podgor MJ, Leske MC, Ederer F. Incidence estimates for lens changes, macular changes, open-angle glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy. Am J Epidemiol. 1983;118:206–212.
53 Klein R, Klein BE, Jensen SC, et al. The five-year incidence and progression of age-related maculopathy: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:7–21.
54 Mukesh BN, Dimitrov PN, Leikin S, et al. Five-year incidence of age-related maculopathy: the Visual Impairment Project. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1176–1182.
55 Leske MC, Wu SY, Hyman L, et al. Four-year incidence of macular changes in the Barbados Eye Studies. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:706–711.
56 Klein R, Knudtson MD, Lee KE, et al. Age-period-cohort effect on the incidence of age-related macular degeneration: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1460–1467.
57 Clemons TE, Chew EY, Bressler SB, et al. National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS): AREDS report no. 10. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:211–217.
58 Mitchell J, Wolffsohn J, Woodcock A, et al. The MacDQoL individualized measure of the impact of macular degeneration on quality of life: reliability and responsiveness. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146:447–454.
59 Alexander MF, Maguire MG, Lietman TM, et al. Assessment of visual function in patients with age-related macular degeneration and low visual acuity. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:1543–1547.
60 Mangione CM, Gutierrez PR, Lowe G, et al. Influence of age-related maculopathy on visual functioning and health-related quality of life. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128:45–53.
61 Brody BL, Gamst AC, Williams RA, et al. Depression, visual acuity, comorbidity, and disability associated with age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1893–1900. discussion 900–1
62 Casten RJ, Rovner BW, Tasman W. Age-related macular degeneration and depression: a review of recent research. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004;15:181–183.
63 Rovner BW, Casten RJ, Tasman WS. Effect of depression on vision function in age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1041–1044.
64 Javitt JC, Zhou Z, Maguire MG, et al. Incidence of exudative age-related macular degeneration among elderly Americans. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1534–1539.
65 Risk factors associated with age-related macular degeneration. A case-control study in the age-related eye disease study: Age-Related Eye Disease Study Report no. 3. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:2224–2232.
66 Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, et al. Racial differences in the cause-specific prevalence of blindness in east Baltimore. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1412–1417.
67 Cruickshanks KJ, Hamman RF, Klein R, et al. The prevalence of age-related maculopathy by geographic region and ethnicity. The Colorado–Wisconsin Study of Age-Related Maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:242–250.
68 Varma R, Fraser-Bell S, Tan S, et al. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino eye study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1288–1297.
69 Kawasaki R, Yasuda M, Song SJ, et al. The prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in Asians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:921–927.
70 Adler NE, Boyce WT, Chesney MA, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in health. No easy solution. JAMA. 1993;269:3140–3145.
71 Risk factors for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. The Eye Disease Case–Control Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:1701–1708.
72 Klein R, Klein BE, Jensen SC, et al. The relation of socioeconomic factors to age-related cataract, maculopathy, and impaired vision. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1969–1979.
73 Hyman LG, Lilienfeld AM, Ferris FL, 3rd., et al. Senile macular degeneration: a case–control study. Am J Epidemiol. 1983;118:213–227.
74 Chaine G, Hullo A, Sahel J, et al. Case–control study of the risk factors for age related macular degeneration. France-DMLA Study Group. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82:996–1002.
75 Maltzman BA, Mulvihill MN, Greenbaum A. Senile macular degeneration and risk factors: a case–control study. Ann Ophthalmol. 1979;11:1197–1201.
76 Wang JJ, Mitchell P, Smith W. Refractive error and age-related maculopathy: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:2167–2171.
77 Ikram MK, van Leeuwen R, Vingerling JR, et al. Relationship between refraction and prevalent as well as incident age-related maculopathy: the Rotterdam Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3778–3782.
78 Friedman E, Ivry M, Ebert E, et al. Increased scleral rigidity and age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 1989;96:104–108.
79 Frank RN, Puklin JE, Stock C, et al. Race, iris color, and age-related macular degeneration. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2000;98:109–115. discussion 15–7
80 Holz FG, Piguet B, Minassian DC, et al. Decreasing stromal iris pigmentation as a risk factor for age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;117:19–23.
81 Mitchell P, Smith W, Wang JJ. Iris color, skin sun sensitivity, and age-related maculopathy. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1359–1363.
82 Sandberg MA, Gaudio AR, Miller S, et al. Iris pigmentation and extent of disease in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:2734–2740.
83 Weiter JJ, Delori FC, Wing GL, et al. Relationship of senile macular degeneration to ocular pigmentation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985;99:185–187.
84 Gibson JM, Shaw DE, Rosenthal AR. Senile cataract and senile macular degeneration: an investigation into possible risk factors. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1986;105(Pt 4):463–468.
85 Klein R, Klein BE, Jensen SC, et al. The relationship of ocular factors to the incidence and progression of age-related maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:506–513.
86 Tomany SC, Klein R, Klein BE. The relationship between iris color, hair color, and skin sun sensitivity and the 10-year incidence of age-related maculopathy: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1526–1533.
87 Wang JJ, Jakobsen K, Smith W, et al. Five-year incidence of age-related maculopathy in relation to iris, skin or hair colour, and skin sun sensitivity: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2003;31:317–321.
88 West SK, Rosenthal FS, Bressler NM, et al. Exposure to sunlight and other risk factors for age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:875–879.
89 Sperduto RD, Hiller R, Seigel D. Lens opacities and senile maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99:1004–1008.
90 Liu IY, White L, LaCroix AZ. The association of age-related macular degeneration and lens opacities in the aged. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:765–769.
91 Klein R, Klein BE, Wang Q, et al. Is age-related maculopathy associated with cataracts? Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:191–196.
92 Lundstrom M, Brege KG, Floren I, et al. Cataract surgery and quality of life in patients with age related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:1330–1335.
93 Freeman EE, Munoz B, West SK, et al. Is there an association between cataract surgery and age-related macular degeneration? Data from three population-based studies. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:849–856.
94 Chew EY, Sperduto RD, Milton RC, et al. Risk of advanced age-related macular degeneration after cataract surgery in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study: AREDS report no. 25. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:297–303.
95 Dong LM, Stark WJ, Jefferys JL, et al. Progression of age-related macular degeneration after cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:1412–1419.
96 Christen WG, Glynn RJ, Manson JE, et al. A prospective study of cigarette smoking and risk of age-related macular degeneration in men. JAMA. 1996;276:1147–1151.
97 Klein R, Klein BE, Franke T. The relationship of cardiovascular disease and its risk factors to age-related maculopathy. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:406–414.
98 Klein R, Klein BE, Tomany SC, et al. Ten-year incidence of age-related maculopathy and smoking and drinking: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:589–598.
99 Delcourt C, Diaz JL, Ponton-Sanchez A, et al. Smoking and age-related macular degeneration. The POLA Study. Pathologies Oculaires Liées à l’Age. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1031–1035.
100 Suner IJ, Espinosa-Heidmann DG, Marin-Castano ME, et al. Nicotine increases size and severity of experimental choroidal neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:311–317.
101 Seddon JM, George S, Rosner B, et al. CFH gene variant, Y402H, and smoking, body mass index, environmental associations with advanced age-related macular degeneration. Hum Hered. 2006;61:157–165.
102 Francis PJ, George S, Schultz DW, et al. The LOC387715 gene, smoking, body mass index, environmental associations with advanced age-related macular degeneration. Hum Hered. 2007;63:212–218.
103 Bone RA, Landrum JT, Guerra LH, et al. Lutein and zeaxanthin dietary supplements raise macular pigment density and serum concentrations of these carotenoids in humans. J Nutr. 2003;133:992–998.
104 Krinsky NI, Landrum JT, Bone RA. Biologic mechanisms of the protective role of lutein and zeaxanthin in the eye. Annu Rev Nutr. 2003;23:171–201.
105 Bernstein PS, Delori FC, Richer S, et al. The value of measurement of macular carotenoid pigment optical densities and distributions in age-related macular degeneration and other retinal disorders. Vision Res. 2010;50:716–728.
106 Evereklioglu C, Er H, Doganay S, et al. Nitric oxide and lipid peroxidation are increased and associated with decreased antioxidant enzyme activities in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Doc Ophthalmol. 2003;106:129–136.
107 Anderson RE, Kretzer FL, Rapp LM. Free radicals and ocular disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1994;366:73–86.
108 Anderson RE, Rapp LM, Wiegand RD. Lipid peroxidation and retinal degeneration. Curr Eye Res. 1984;3:223–227.
109 Young RW. Pathophysiology of age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol. 1987;31:291–306.
110 Hopley C, Salkeld G, Wang JJ, et al. Cost utility of screening and treatment for early age related macular degeneration with zinc and antioxidants. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:450–454.
111 Richer S, Stiles W, Statkute L, et al. Double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of lutein and antioxidant supplementation in the intervention of atrophic age-related macular degeneration: the Veterans LAST study (Lutein Antioxidant Supplementation Trial). Optometry. 2004;75:216–230.
112 Gale CR, Hall NF, Phillips DI, et al. Lutein and zeaxanthin status and risk of age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2461–2465.
113 Goldberg J, Flowerdew G, Smith E, et al. Factors associated with age-related macular degeneration. An analysis of data from the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Epidemiol. 1988;128:700–710.
114 SanGiovanni JP, Chew EY, Clemons TE, et al. The relationship of dietary carotenoid and vitamin A, E, and C intake with age-related macular degeneration in a case-control study: AREDS report no. 22. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:1225–1232.
115 Vinding T, Appleyard M, Nyboe J, et al. Risk factor analysis for atrophic and exudative age-related macular degeneration. An epidemiological study of 1000 aged individuals. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1992;70:66–72.
116 Obisesan TO, Hirsch R, Kosoko O, et al. Moderate wine consumption is associated with decreased odds of developing age-related macular degeneration in NHANES-1. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46:1–7.
117 Cho E, Hankinson SE, Willett WC, et al. Prospective study of alcohol consumption and the risk of age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:681–688.
118 Smith W, Mitchell P. Alcohol intake and age-related maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;122:743–745.
119 Klein BE, Klein R, Lee KE, et al. Measures of obesity and age-related eye diseases. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2001;8:251–262.
120 Delcourt C, Michel F, Colvez A, et al. Associations of cardiovascular disease and its risk factors with age-related macular degeneration: the POLA study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2001;8:237–249.
121 Schaumberg DA, Christen WG, Hankinson SE, et al. Body mass index and the incidence of visually significant age-related maculopathy in men. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1259–1265.
122 Smith W, Mitchell P, Leeder SR, et al. Plasma fibrinogen levels, other cardiovascular risk factors, and age-related maculopathy: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:583–587.
123 Cruickshanks KJ, Klein R, Klein BE. Sunlight and age-related macular degeneration. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:514–518.
124 Cruickshanks KJ, Klein R, Klein BE, et al. Sunlight and the 5-year incidence of early age-related maculopathy: the beaver dam eye study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:246–250.
125 Tomany SC, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein R, et al. Sunlight and the 10-year incidence of age-related maculopathy: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:750–757.
126 Delcourt C, Carriere I, Ponton-Sanchez A, et al. Light exposure and the risk of age-related macular degeneration: the Pathologies Oculaires Liées à l’Age (POLA) study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1463–1468.
127 Darzins P, Mitchell P, Heller RF. Sun exposure and age-related macular degeneration. An Australian case–control study. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:770–776.
128 Hyman L, Schachat AP, He Q, et al. Hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and age-related macular degeneration. Age-Related Macular Degeneration Risk Factors Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:351–358.
129 Wilson HL, Schwartz DM, Bhatt HR, et al. Statin and aspirin therapy are associated with decreased rates of choroidal neovascularization among patients with age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:615–624.
130 Hall NF, Gale CR, Syddall H, et al. Risk of macular degeneration in users of statins: cross-sectional study. BMJ. 2001;323:375–376.
131 van Leeuwen R, Vingerling JR, Hofman A, et al. Cholesterol lowering drugs and risk of age related maculopathy: prospective cohort study with cumulative exposure measurement. BMJ. 2003;326:255–256.
132 Hall NF, Martyn CN. Could statins prevent age-related macular degeneration? Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2002;3:803–807.
133 Seddon JM, Gensler G, Milton RC, et al. Association between C-reactive protein and age-related macular degeneration. JAMA. 2004;291:704–710.
134 Klein R, Klein BE, Tomany SC, et al. The association of cardiovascular disease with the long-term incidence of age-related maculopathy: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1273–1280.
135 Snow KK, Seddon JM. Do age-related macular degeneration and cardiovascular disease share common antecedents? Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1999;6:125–143.
136 van Leeuwen R, Ikram MK, Vingerling JR, et al. Blood pressure, atherosclerosis, and the incidence of age-related maculopathy: the Rotterdam Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3771–3777.
137 Vingerling JR, Dielemans I, Bots ML, et al. Age-related macular degeneration is associated with atherosclerosis. The Rotterdam Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:404–409.
138 Hirvela H, Luukinen H, Laara E, et al. Risk factors of age-related maculopathy in a population 70 years of age or older. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:871–877.
139 Vinding T. Age-related macular degeneration. An epidemiological study of 1000 elderly individuals. With reference to prevalence, funduscopic findings, visual impairment and risk factors. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl. 1995:1–32.
140 Sperduto RD, Hiller R. Systemic hypertension and age-related maculopathy in the Framingham Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986;104:216–219.
141 Delaney WV, Jr., Oates RP. Senile macular degeneration: a preliminary study. Ann Ophthalmol. 1982;14:21–24.
142 Kahn HA, Leibowitz HM, Ganley JP, et al. The Framingham Eye Study. II. Association of ophthalmic pathology with single variables previously measured in the Framingham Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1977;106:33–41.
143 Vidaurri JS, Pe’er J, Halfon ST, et al. Association between drusen and some of the risk factors for coronary artery disease. Ophthalmologica. 1984;188:243–247.
144 Klein R, Klein BE, Jensen SC. The relation of cardiovascular disease and its risk factors to the 5-year incidence of age-related maculopathy: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1804–1812.
145 Klein R, Klein BE, Tomany SC, et al. The relation of retinal microvascular characteristics to age-related eye disease: the Beaver Dam eye study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:435–444.
146 Risk factors for choroidal neovascularization in the second eye of patients with juxtafoveal or subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:741–747.
147 Reynolds R, Rosner B, Seddon JM. Serum lipid biomarkers and hepatic lipase gene associations with age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1989–1995.
148 Klein R, Klein BE, Marino EK, et al. Early age-related maculopathy in the cardiovascular health study. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:25–33.
149 van Leeuwen R, Klaver CC, Vingerling JR, et al. Cholesterol and age-related macular degeneration: is there a link? Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:750–752.
150 Christen WG, Schaumberg DA, Glynn RJ, et al. Dietary Ω-3 fatty acid and fish intake and incident age-related macular degeneration in women. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129:921–929.
151 Mares-Perlman JA, Brady WE, Klein R, et al. Dietary fat and age-related maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:743–748.
152 Heuberger RA, Mares-Perlman JA, Klein R, et al. Relationship of dietary fat to age-related maculopathy in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1833–1838.
153 SanGiovanni JP, Chew EY, Agron E, et al. The relationship of dietary omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid intake with incident age-related macular degeneration: AREDS report no. 23. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:1274–1279.
154 Friedman E. Dietary fat and age-related maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:235–236.
155 Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE. Diabetes, hyperglycemia, and age-related maculopathy. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:1527–1534.
156 Snow KK, Cote J, Yang W, et al. Association between reproductive and hormonal factors and age-related maculopathy in postmenopausal women. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134:842–848.
157 Snow KK, Seddon JM. Age-related eye diseases: impact of hormone replacement therapy, and reproductive and other risk factors. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2000;45:301–313.
158 Klein BE, Klein R, Jensen SC, et al. Are sex hormones associated with age-related maculopathy in women? The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1994;92:289–295. discussion 95–7
159 Smith W, Mitchell P, Wang JJ. Gender, oestrogen, hormone replacement and age-related macular degeneration: results from the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1997;25(Suppl 1):S13–S15.
160 Defay R, Pinchinat S, Lumbroso S, et al. Sex steroids and age-related macular degeneration in older French women: the POLA study. Ann Epidemiol. 2004;14:202–208.
161 Abramov Y, Borik S, Yahalom C, et al. The effect of hormone therapy on the risk for age-related maculopathy in postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2004;11:62–68.
162 Klein R, Deng Y, Klein BE, et al. Cardiovascular disease, its risk factors and treatment, and age-related macular degeneration: Women’s Health Initiative Sight Exam ancillary study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:473–483.
163 Anderson DH, Mullins RF, Hageman GS, et al. A role for local inflammation in the formation of drusen in the aging eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134:411–431.
164 Johnson LV, Leitner WP, Staples MK, et al. Complement activation and inflammatory processes in Drusen formation and age related macular degeneration. Exp Eye Res. 2001;73:887–896.
165 Mullins RF, Russell SR, Anderson DH, et al. Drusen associated with aging and age-related macular degeneration contain proteins common to extracellular deposits associated with atherosclerosis, elastosis, amyloidosis, and dense deposit disease. FASEB J. 2000;14:835–846.
166 Seddon JM, Gensler G, Rosner B. C-reactive protein and CFH, ARMS2/HTRA1 gene variants are independently associated with risk of macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1560–1566.
167 Becerra EM, Morescalchi F, Gandolfo F, et al. Clinical evidence of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in the management of age-related macular degeneration. Curr Drug Targets. 2011;12:149–172.
168 Soames CJ, Sim RB. Interactions between human complement components factor H, factor I and C3b. Biochem J. 1997;326(Pt 2):553–561.
169 Gehrs KM, Jackson JR, Brown EN, et al. Complement, age-related macular degeneration and a vision of the future. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128:349–358.
170 Seddon JM, Sobrin L. Epidemiology of age-related macular degeneration. In: Albert D, Miller J, Azar D, et al. Albert & Jakobiec’s Principles and practice of ophthalmology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2007:413–422.
171 Seddon JM, Ajani UA, Mitchell BD. Familial aggregation of age-related maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:199–206.
172 Klaver CC, Wolfs RC, Assink JJ, et al. Genetic risk of age-related maculopathy. Population-based familial aggregation study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1646–1651.
173 Hughes AE, Orr N, Esfandiary H, et al. A common CFH haplotype, with deletion of CFHR1 and CFHR3, is associated with lower risk of age-related macular degeneration. Nat Genet. 2006;38:1173–1177.
174 Jakobsdottir J, Conley YP, Weeks DE, et al. Susceptibility genes for age-related maculopathy on chromosome 10q26. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;77:389–407.
175 Sobrin L, Reynolds R, Yu Y, et al. ARMS2/HTRA1 locus can confer differential susceptibility to the advanced subtypes of age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(2):345–352.
176 Weber BH, Vogt G, Pruett RC, et al. Mutations in the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-3 (TIMP3) in patients with Sorsby’s fundus dystrophy. Nat Genet. 1994;8:352–356.
177 Brantley MA, Jr., Fang AM, King JM, et al. Association of complement factor H and LOC387715 genotypes with response of exudative age-related macular degeneration to intravitreal bevacizumab. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:2168–2173.
178 Nischler C, Oberkofler H, Ortner C, et al. Complement factor H Y402H gene polymorphism and response to intravitreal bevacizumab in exudative age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011;89:e344–e349.
179 Lee AY, Raya AK, Kymes SM, et al. Pharmacogenetics of complement factor H (Y402H) and treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration with ranibizumab. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:610–613.
180 Klein ML, Francis PJ, Rosner B, et al. CFH and LOC387715/ARMS2 genotypes and treatment with antioxidants and zinc for age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1019–1025.
181 Brantley MA, Jr., Edelstein SL, King JM, et al. Association of complement factor H and LOC387715 genotypes with response of exudative age-related macular degeneration to photodynamic therapy. Eye (Lond). 2009;23:626–631.
182 Chowers I, Cohen Y, Goldenberg-Cohen N, et al. Association of complement factor H Y402H polymorphism with phenotype of neovascular age related macular degeneration in Israel. Mol Vis. 2008;14:1829–1834.
183 Feng X, Xiao J, Longville B, et al. Complement factor H Y402H and C-reactive protein polymorphism and photodynamic therapy response in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1908–1912. e1
184 Tsuchihashi T, Mori K, Horie-Inoue K, et al. Complement factor H and high-temperature requirement A-1 genotypes and treatment response of age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:93–100.
185 Raychaudhuri S, Iartchouk O, Chin K, et al. A rare penetrant mutation in CFH confers high risk of age-related macular degeneration. Nat Genet. 2011;43:1232–1236.