Endoscopic mid and lower face rejuvenation

Published on 22/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Plastic Reconstructive Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2101 times

CHAPTER 15 Endoscopic mid and lower face rejuvenation

History

The concepts and principles for the endoscopic midface procedure currently employed began in the 1980s when plate fixation for zygomatic fractures was introduced. These plates necessitated wide subperiosteal stripping for exposure and fixation. Postoperatively, patients developed significant soft tissue ptosis that was ascribed to this extensive dissection without adequate soft tissue suspension. Since these plates were to be removed at a second stage, resuspension of the soft tissues through a subperiosteal dissection was subsequently carried out at that time. To our surprise we failed to restore the preoperative aesthetics through this approach. In some instances there was excess bunching and fullness in the lower lid necessitating removal of substantial amounts of lower lid skin and orbicularis oculi muscle that ultimately resulted in very unpredictable lower lid outcomes. Suffice it to say that the final outcome on the operated side seldom succeeded in achieving aesthetic symmetry with the normal unoperated side.

These disappointing results prompted a fresh cadaver anatomic study of a supraperiosteal approach specifically aimed at remaining above the zygomaticus major muscle and below the orbicularis oculi muscle. This approach had the advantage of mobilizing the orbicularis oculi muscle, malar fat pad, and high SMAS as a composite unit while avoiding the downward force of the zygomaticus major muscle by leaving its origin attached to the bone. This anatomic approach was adopted as an aesthetic procedure and was reported in the 1990s as an extended temporal lift.1 It reached its full aesthetic value as an endoscopic procedure in the late 1990s where motor innervation to the lower eyelid was further defined and precise suture fixation of the orbicularis muscle identified in a manner that allowed correction of most lower lid problems.2,3 Complete with this evolution of facial aesthetics was the simultaneous recognition that the midface procedure necessitated adjustments in lower facial rejuvenation that emphasized the neck and jawline, and at the same time eliminated the lateral sweep deformity as described by Hamra.3

Physical evaluation

The overt signs of facial aging are noted in most patients around the age of 40 and are generally periocular in location. The cause is the combined effect of gravity and the activity of the orbicularis oculi muscle. Patients most frequently complain that they look tired in spite of being well rested. In some patients, and certainly among older patient groups, attention is focused on jowl, jawline, and neck laxity. If balanced facial rejuvenation is to be achieved, care must be taken not to overlook the concomitant changes of the upper and midface in these patients, and of the value of a vertical high SMAS movement when the lower face is addressed. Key points to the evaluation are as follows:

image

Fig. 15.2 The same patient as in Fig. 15.1, with two finger elevation of the brow and cheek to mimic correction and demonstrates the improved aesthetics.

Anatomy

A key goal in the forehead and midface portion of this procedure is the mobilization and release of the orbicularis oculi muscle from the orbit. The release is above rather than below the periosteum. We feel this obtains more shaping of the brow and an effective shift of the preseptal upper lid orbicularis, which eliminates the need for upper eyelid muscle resection. Critical to the mobility of the orbicularis oculi muscle is the release of the preseptal muscle from its attachments to the orbital rim. In the lower lid this attachment has been identified as the zygo-orbicular ligament.3 Laterally this same attachment along the outer rim surface represents the superficial head of the lateral canthus, while in the upper lid fusion between the orbit and orbicularis is anatomically similar to that described in the lower eyelid. This zone of fusion serves as a retaining structure to the brow.4 The selective release, mobilization, and fixation of these retaining structures of the orbicularis oculi muscle are important to achieving the desired periorbital aesthetics. Precise suture placement in the four target zones of the orbicularis oculi muscle allows lower lid shaping and control based on the requirements of the lid morphology (Fig. 15.3).

A second key in achieving the desired aesthetic relationship between the midface and lower eyelid depends on the release and mobilization of the malar retaining ligament.5 This ligament consists of a dime-sized zone of fibrous attachments extending from the periosteum of the zygomatic eminence to the subcutaneous tissue of the cheek. The lateral and most dense portion of this ligament arises from the lateral border of the zygoma where the masseter muscle attaches. Fibers continue through the origin of the zygomaticus major muscle and extend superficially through the malar fat pad and lateral border of the orbicularis oculi muscle (Fig. 15.4). By releasing these fibers above the zygomaticus major muscle, the midface can be moved vertically, eliminating the downward force of the zygomaticus muscle that is typically produced in a subperiosteal approach. The anatomic components of this midface movement include the orbital portion of the orbicularis oculi muscle, the malar fat pad, and the upper or high SMAS.

The third anatomic key of the eyelid midface procedure is the sparing of the orbicularis oculi muscle. This is achieved by avoiding: muscle division, muscle resection, and muscle denervation. The motor innervation to the lower lid orbicularis not only arises medially from the zygomatic branch running deep to the zygomaticus major muscle, but also laterally from branches arising from the zygomatic branch before it passes beneath the zygomaticus major muscle6 (Fig. 15.5). These lateral branches enter the inferior lateral belly of the orbicularis muscle. While the medial innervation is integral to the blink reflex, the lateral innervation is equally important to lower lid pretarsal muscle tone. It is for this reason that transpalpebral division of the orbicularis muscle is avoided and a transconjunctival approach is used when access to fat or the septum is needed.

The relevant anatomy to lower facial rejuvenation hinges on the mobilization and fixation of the structures previously described. The important fact to be recognized is that the upper or high SMAS movement has already occurred. Hence, when dealing with the lower face, a skin only or low SMAS skin procedure is indicated. The vector of the low SMAS or skin procedure is placed in a lateral direction along the jawline. Emphasizing a strong jawline vector while avoiding the additional lateral tension on the high SMAS, avoids the tightening and the flattening of the malar remnants with the creation of submalar traction lines that have been referred to as “lateral sweep.”7 In the majority of patients who have significant lower facial laxity my preference is a separate skin and SMAS flap procedure. The SMAS is elevated in continuity with the platysma muscle so that a strong lateral vector SMAS-platysma pull is achieved along the jawline (Fig. 15.6). The skin is closed with minimal preauricular tension. The lateral vector SMAS platysma movement generally fails to provide adequate tension in the submental area from the hyoid to the mandible. A medial plication in this zone is usually incorporated. Platysma muscle division is reserved for banding and for very obtuse necks.

Technical steps

Midface dissection

Access to the midface is obtained by extending the brow dissection over the superficial temporalis muscle fascia, deep to the temporoparietal and innominate fascia. At the level of the sentinel vein the superficial temporal muscle fascia is scored so as to bifurcate the fascia establishing a plane that is followed down to the zygomatic arch. A medial to lateral dissection extending from the lateral rim out across the temporalis fascia is employed. Dissection follows the lateral rim and superior margin of the zygomatic arch. At the junction of the lateral one-third and medial two-thirds of the arch, a one-centimeter subperiosteal tunnel is developed over the arch. The periosteum is incised laterally and then dissection is extended medially over the arch above the periosteum until the infraorbital rim is encountered. The reason for elevating the small subperiosteal tunnel is to create a point of anchorage along the course the temporal branch of the facial nerve so as to avoid traction injury on the nerve when the midface is mobilized vertically. Dissection along the infraorbital rim continues in the suborbicularis oculi fat (SOOF) beneath the orbicularis oculi muscle. The zygo-orbicular ligament, which connects the preseptal orbicularis muscle to the infraorbital rim is visualized and released (Fig. 15.7). This release spans 8–10 mm and completely liberates the orbicularis at the lid–cheek junction. If excess orbital lid fat is present or if the orbital septum is lax, a transconjunctival preseptal dissection is performed. This connects the plane established by the midface dissection. The mobilized midface facilitates exposure to the fat compartments and orbital septum allowing fat removal and/or septal reset when required. The dissection then extends above the zygomaticus major muscle passing through the malar retaining ligament. Vertical spreading with tenotomy scissors disrupts these strong connective tissue attachments and spares the branches to the lateral orbicularis oculi muscle arising vertically from the zygomatic branch of the facial nerve (Fig. 15.8). The majority of these nerve branches are seen immediately lateral to the zygomatic major muscle. When the malar retaining ligament has been completely released, significant mobility of the midface is achieved. Structures moved are the lateral portion of the orbicularis oculi muscle, the malar fat pad, and the high SMAS. To fix these structures, a single suture of 4-0 clear nylon is passed through the cephalic portion of the malar retaining ligament and anchored to the superficial temporal fascia just lateral to the lateral orbital rim. This single suture is all that is required in the majority of patients. Additional orbicularis oculi sutures are used to shape the lower lid when required. When scleral show or lid laxity is present, a 5-0 clear nylon is placed in the pretarsal muscle and fixed to the deep head of the lateral canthal tendon. In the presence of a proptotic globe or negative vector orbit, a suture is placed in the orbital portion of the orbicularis muscle and sutured directly cephalad along the infraorbital rim. This vertical movement of the orbicularis elevates the lid and eliminates “clothes lining” of the lid that can occur with a traditional canthopexy. The final suture variation involves direct release of the deep head of the lateral canthal tendon and repositioning cephalad. This maneuver is reserved for patients with true canthal malposition and has only been required in 3% of patients. Lower eyelid skin is only removed if significant bunching is created with an approximate 2–3 mm excess. A Croton Oil peel may be applied for minor lower eyelid skin excess or crêpey skin. Commonly, micro-fat grafting is performed in the malar groove, nasolabial folds and lateral malar depression to blend any hollowing created by the vertical lift of the midface. The fat is harvested from an abdominal source at the beginning of the procedure and prepared for injection during the midface and brow dissection. Approximately 0.5 to 1 mL of fat is injected into the malar groove, 2 to 3 mL into the lateral malar area, and 2 mL into the nasolabial folds. A small 7 mm perforated round drain is placed in the temporal incision and extends into the malar dead space.

Lower face and neck

The endoscopic brow midface procedure has minimal effect on jawline laxity and no effect on the neck. To combine correction of the lower face and neck with the midface procedure, a retrotragal preauricular incision is carried around the postauricular sulcus to the level of the tragus. This is then extended posteriorly in a curvilinear manner into the hair-bearing scalp. A separate skin and SMAS flap is elevated (refer to Fig. 15.6). Skin dissection varies but generally extends to the midcheek and jawline area, whereas in the neck it extends across the midline. The SMAS is elevated in continuity with the platysma and is elevated across the parotid until the mobile SMAS is encountered. Platysmal elevation stops at the approximate level of the thyroid cartilage. The superior edge of SMAS elevation goes only to the tragus. It is important to avoid extending the SMAS dissection to a high SMAS plane over the arch. This will avoid disruption of the SMAS previously mobilized with the endoscopic procedure. The SMAS and platysma are grasped at the level of the inferior part of the jawline and at the superior edge of SMAS dissection and pulled laterally. Generally 1 to 2 cm of SMAS excess is resected. At the level of the jawline the resected margin of the platysma is sutured to the fixed mastoid fascia with a 4-0 Mersiline® suture (Ethicon, Inc. Somerville, NJ). Similarly the free edge of the superior portion of the SMAS is anchored to the fixed portion of the SMAS immediately in front of the tragus. With these two points of fixation, the remainder of the SMAS and platysma is sutured with a running 4-0 Mersiline® suture (Ethicon, Inc. Somerville, NJ) from its inferior border to superior edge of the SMAS.

If neck banding or an obtuse neck angle is present the inferior edge of the platysma at the level of the thyroid will be divided and advanced laterally and then reapproximated along its line of division. This reapproximation of the platysma avoids window shading along the area of division and creates a vertical elevation of the lateral and inferior neck. When redundancy or banding is seen in the central neck, a 3 cm submental incision is placed 2 mm inferior to the crease with wide dissection performed above the platysma in continuity with the lateral skin. Medially, plication of the platysma from the level of the hyoid to the inferior edge of the mandible is accomplished with 4-0 Mersiline® sutures (Ethicon, Inc. Somerville, NJ). Excess preplatysmal fat is removed, but only cautious removal of subplatysmal fat is carried out so as to avoid over accentuation of the central neck and exposure of the digastric muscle and submandibular gland. Fibrin glue may be sprayed subcutaneously in males and/or hypertensive patients. The skin incisions are closed by placing all tension on the retroauricular incision and leaving a tension-free preauricular incision. By extending the retroauricular incision into the hair-bearing scalp as an arc, a lateral and superior advancement of the neck flap can be carried out that allows realignment of the hairline and vertical elevation of the lateral neck. This adjustment minimizes the occurrence of plication folds of the posterior neck when direct lateral advancement is carried out. A 10 mm drain is placed through the posterior scalp incision and left overnight to drain the neck.

Postoperative care

When the endoscopic brow midface procedure is done as a stand-alone procedure, an elastic band is placed around the forehead providing light compression and a way to hold the hemovac drains that were placed through the temporal incision. When the procedure is combined with a low SMAS neck procedure, a conventional facelift dressing which pads the neck and cheek area is employed. All patients receive 8 mg of Decadron® IV (Abraxis Pharmaceutical Products, Schaumburg, IL, USA) at the initiation of the procedure and are placed on a tapering dose pack that extends out to five days. All patients receive prophylactic antibiotics for 3–5 days. Drains are left in for 12–24 hours. A lighter dressing compressing the neck/jawline is reapplied. The dressing is removed at the time of suture removal on day 5–7. An elastic neckband is worn at night for the next 5 days or until bruising has resolved. Makeup generally begins on the 10th day. Most patients return to work in two weeks, but are advised that they will have tightness and excess lateral canthal tension out to three weeks postoperatively.

If patients undergo upper and/or lower blepharoplasty procedures, Swiss eye masks and aggressive eye lubrication are applied perioperatively for corneal protection. Tobradex® eye drops (Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, TX, USA) are used for the septal reset patients.

Complications

The most common complication with the endoscopic midface procedure is asymmetry between the sides. Because fixation and position is suture dependant for the first three weeks following the procedure, we don’t engage in massage to loosen or adjust the procedure until that time. Since no scalp has been removed the site that is too tight can generally be loosened with topical massage over the points of suture fixation. It is important to point out asymmetries in brow and eyelid position prior to the surgery, as these will certainly be noted afterwards. No promise is made to correct extreme degrees of asymmetry, as over tightening the muscle on one side can produce expression asymmetries that are more notable than the passive asymmetry. Acute suture failure with loss of brow fixation occurred in 3% of 100 consecutive patients. This required immediate replacement of the suture. Loss of midface fixation has only been seen in a single elderly patient. Lower lid retraction, ectropion, and canthal malposition have been corrected rather than created by the midface procedure in conjunction with the orbicularis sutures described here. No occurrence of hematoma has been associated with the midface procedure. Complications to the lower face most commonly relate to incomplete correction of the marionette and jowl as they cross the jawline medially. Hematoma in the neck area has occurred in 2% of the patients and has most notably been limited to males and patients with pre-existing hypertension. Nerve injury or skin loss has not occurred.

Criticisms and downsides

The main criticism of this procedure is the complexity of the anatomy as it is seen through the endoscope. The three dimensional view of the sub-SMAS midface plane and the tactile sense of the tissues is lost with this approach. One must rely on anatomic relationships and boney landmarks to maintain a spatial sense during the dissection. The senior author has customized his instruments to allow for manipulation and use within the small operative field. One must have advanced endoscopic experience to be facile with the dissection and fixation of the midface and brow. As well, some would argue the long-term power within an endoscopic browlift; though the senior author (SB) feels that with directed release of the brow and its retaining ligaments, along with cable suture fixation, long-term brow elevation can be achieved.

Pearls & pitfalls