Endomyocardial Biopsy

Published on 23/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Internal Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1650 times

Chapter 13

Endomyocardial Biopsy

1. Why is an endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) performed?

    A few cardiovascular disorders can only or most accurately be diagnosed by examination of heart tissue. These disorders include giant cell myocarditis, amyloidosis, and allograft rejection. In each case, the unique information gained from EMB can inform prognosis and/or guide treatment. The information gained from EMB can also help diagnose certain restrictive cardiomyopathies and cardiac masses.

2. How is an EMB performed?

    A bioptome is shown in Figure 13-1. The Stanford-Caves-Schultz and the King bioptomes access the right ventricle through the right internal jugular vein. A modified Cordis bioptome (B-18110, Wolfgang Meiners Medizintechnik, Monheim, Germany) has been used for access from the right femoral vein. The subclavian and left femoral veins are used less frequently.

    The femoral artery may be used as a percutaneous access site for left ventricular biopsy.

    The right ventricular septum is the preferred site for EMB, to minimize the risk of perforation. Fluoroscopy and/or echocardiography guidance are essential to localize the site of biopsy. Endocardial voltage mapping has been used to identify biopsy sites in suspected arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) and cardiac sarcoidosis. Six to eight samples are generally obtained using the Stanford-Caves device. Up to ten samples are obtained by investigators who use the smaller Meiners Medizintechnik bioptome.

    The sample must be handled carefully to minimize crush artifacts. The biopsy specimen should be transferred from the bioptome to fixative by use of a sterile needle and not with forceps.

3. What are the risks associated with an EMB?

    Risks correlated with EMB are summarized in Table 13-1. EMB is associated with a serious acute complication rate of less than 1% using the current flexible bioptomes, and the overall rate of complication is reported as less than 6% in most case series. Complications include access-site hematoma, transient right bundle branch block (RBBB), transient arrhythmias, tricuspid regurgitation, and, rarely, pulmonary embolism. Life-threatening complications occur far less frequently. Right ventricular perforation was reported in less than 1% of patients. Following cardiac transplant, the risk is especially low. The risks of EMB depend on the clinical state of the patient, the experience of the operator, and site procedural volume.

4. How is the EMB tissue analyzed?

    Specimen preparation depends on the clinical question to be answered.

    Standard histological preparation for light microscopy can be used in the diagnosis of transplant rejection and myocarditis, and involves formalin fixation and paraffin wax embedding. Transmission electron microscopy requires glutaraldehyde fixation and can be helpful is the assessment of anthracycline drug toxicity and metabolic and storage disorders. Polymerase chain reaction for viral DNA amplification is best performed on unfixed samples. An RNase inhibitor is often used to prevent degradation of RNA virus genomes. Molecular typing of amyloidosis (e.g., AL, ATTR, and familial) is best performed with tandem mass spectroscopy.

5. When should EMB be performed?

    EMB is not commonly indicated in the evaluation of heart disease and should only be performed in specific clinical circumstances in which EMB results may meaningfully modify prognosis or guide treatment. In 2007, an American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and European Society of Cardiology (AHA/ACC/ESC) scientific statement recommended that EMB be used selectively in a limited set of clinical scenarios described in the answers to Questions 6 through 8. Since that statement, reports suggest that EMB may also have a role in the evaluation of idiopathic heart block for possible cardiac sarcoidosis or giant cell myocarditis.

6. What are the class I recommendations to perform an EMB?

7. When is it reasonable to perform an EMB (class IIa recommendation)?

image Clinical scenario 3: Unexplained HF of more than 3 months duration associated with a dilated left ventricle and new ventricular arrhythmias, Mobitz type II second-degree AV block, third-degree AV block, or failure to respond to usual care within 1 to 2 weeks

image Clinical Scenario 4: Unexplained HF with a dilated cardiomyopathy of any duration associated with a suspected allergic reaction in addition to eosinophilia

image Clinical Scenario 5: Unexplained HF associated with suspected anthracycline cardiomyopathy

image Clinical Scenario 6: HF associated with restrictive cardiomyopathy

image Clinical Scenario 7: Suspected cardiac tumors, with the exception of typical myxomas

image Clinical Scenario 8: Unexplained cardiomyopathy in children

image Clinical Scenario 9: Unexplained new-onset HF of 2 weeks to 3 months duration associated with a dilated cardiomyopathy without new ventricular arrhythmias or AV block

image Clinical scenario 10: Unexplained HF of more than 3 months duration associated with a dilated cardiomyopathy without new ventricular arrhythmias or AV block that responds to usual care within 1 to 2 weeks

8. When can you consider EMB (class IIb recommendation)?

9. What are some of the findings on pathology in different cardiac conditions?

image Lymphocytic myocarditis: diagnosis of myocarditis is made when there is inflammatory infiltrate with associated myocyte damage

image Idiopathic giant cell myocarditis: myocyte necrosis, poorly formed granulomas and eosinophils

image Sarcoidosis: well-formed nonnecrotizing granulomas (Fig. 13-2, A)

image Dilated cardiomyopathy: commonly associated with end-stage hypertensive, ischemic, valvular disease. The most common finding in dilated cardiomyopathy is myocyte hypertrophy and interstitial fibrosis.

image Hemochromatosis: iron is demonstrated (Fig. 13-2, B)

image Amyloidosis: a Congo red stain shows apple-green birefringence under polarized light (Fig. 13-2, C)