Endocrinology

Published on 24/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Internal Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1725 times

DIABETES MELLITUS

Case vignette

A 58-year-old female presents with nausea and vomiting in the background of progressive exertional dyspnoea.She is a smoker with a 10-pack per year history. She was diagnosed with diabetes 2 years ago and has been managed on metformin 500 mg twice daily. On examination she has coarse crepitations in the lung bases bilaterally. She has an S3 gallop in the precordium. She is obese and has moderate bipedal pitting oedema. Blood pressure is 140/90 mmHg. On the ECG, ST segment depression is observed in the lateral leads. Her fasting blood sugar levels are 11.2 mmo/L with an Hb A1c of 8.2%. Serum troponin level is not elevated.

Approach to the patient

Diabetes is a very commonly encountered condition in the long case setting. Most diabetic patients have multiple associated medical conditions, and this makes them favourite long case material. A candidate is expected to be able to address diabetic cases thoroughly and extensively. Ascertain whether the patient has the metabolic syndrome (see box) that is associated with high cardiovascular risk. The following is a discussion of the integral issues that should never be missed in any diabetic case.

History

Ask about:

when and how the diagnosis was made, and symptoms at presentation, such as loss of weight, polyuria, polydypsia, and other associated presenting features such as diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar coma and infection

initial treatment, subsequent treatment and the current medical regimen

age at disease onset

the type of diabetes the patient has—this has implications for the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis and for the therapeutic regimens

the insulin treatment, such as previous and/or current regimens, types of insulin, dose and frequency of administration, who injects the insulin, the method of delivery (pen or syringe) and adverse effects associated with insulin treatment

medication history, in detail—note the different classes of drugs that have been used to treat the diabetes, and also other medications that would interfere with adequate glycaemic control

the patient’s knowledge of and compliance with the diabetic diet, and knowledge of the concept of the glycaemic index of various carbohydrate-containing foods

who monitors the blood sugar levels and how often this is done—ask for the most recent readings

episodes of ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar coma and other acute events that have necessitated hospitalisation

whether the patient suffers from hypoglycaemic episodes and how he or she recognises early warning signs, and what remedial measures the patient takes in such situations

other vascular risk factors, such as smoking, hyperlipidaemia and hypertension

The social and occupational impact of diabetes on the patient should be discussed in detail. Talk about impotence, if relevant to the patient. Social and marital issues associated with this condition should be dealt with in detail. Check for a family history of diabetes mellitus and obtain details thereof.
Exclude possible secondary causes for the diabetes, such as chronic pancreatitis, cystic fibrosis, Cushing’s syndrome, acromegaly, polycystic ovary syndrome and consumption of drugs such as corticosteroids, thiazides and the oral contraceptive pill (see box).

Examination

Management

Discussion of therapeutic options revolves around the diabetic diet, regular physical exercise, oral hypoglycaemic agents and their side effects, and insulin therapy. Objectives of diabetes management include: 1) adequate control of the blood sugar level (fasting levels to be maintained below 6.1 mmol/L and postprandial levels below 7.8 mmol/L) and the glycosylated haemoglobin level (should be maintained below 7% in most cases, based on the patient’s clinical status); 2) prevention of end-organ complications; and 3) control of other vascular risk factors.

1. Hypoglycaemic agents—If the diabetic diet and physical exercise fail to provide adequate glycaemic control in the patient with type 2 diabetes, consider commencing an oral hypoglycaemic agent. Commonly used agents are:

biguanides—metformin is the most common and the first line of pharmacotherapy in type 2 diabetes. Act to enhance peripheral insulin sensitivity. Side effects of this class of drugs include diarrhoea, nausea, impaired vitamin B12 absorption and lactic acidosis, particularly in patients with hepatic or renal failure.

sulfonylureas—act via stimulation of pancreatic insulin secretion. Side effects of this class of drugs include hypoglycaemia, weight gain, rash and, very rarely, bone marrow suppression and cholestasis. Sulfonylureas have been associated with an increased mortality rate in post myocardial infarction patients.

meglitinides—repaglinide is a short-acting agent that acts by stimulating pancreatic insulin secretion, but can cause weight gain and hypoglycaemia. This agent can be given in combination with metformin.

alpha-glucosidase inhibitor agents such as acarbose act to inhibit the activity of intestinal glucosidase enzymes. Their side effect profile includes bloating, abdominal discomfort, diarrhoea and flatulence.

2. Insulin therapy—Type 2 diabetic patients whose glycaemic control is suboptimal on oral agents alone need therapy with insulin, as do all type 1 diabetics. Insulin therapy can be commenced as an outpatient at a dose of 0.25 units per kg (in an inpatient it can be commenced at up to 1 unit per kg) and the dose increased according to the blood sugar control achieved. Different centres have different protocols for insulin therapy, so it is best to know thoroughly the one used at your centre. A combination short- and long-acting insulin 30/70 units twice daily divided into a ratio of 2:1, before lunch and before dinner, is a good starting regimen for the patient with type 2 diabetes. Premixed rapid-acting insulin 25 units is another attractive option for the mature-onset diabetes patient. This is composed of 25% insulin lispro (rapid-acting) with 75% insulin lispro-protamine (intermediate-acting), and should be administered preprandially twice daily. Because of its very rapid onset of action, it can be given immediately before meals, thus ensuring convenience of use and better compliance. Insulin regimens for the patient with type 1 diabetes are different from those for the patient with type 2 diabetes and are usually a four-times-a-day regimen.
Once-daily, long-acting insulin analogues such as glargine can be given to patients with type 2 diabetes on oral agents requiring insulin therapy.

4. Prevention of end-organ damage—When a patient tests positive for microalbuminuria it is important to ensure strict blood pressure control to prevent progression to diabetic nephropathy. Ideally the blood pressure in the diabetic patient will be below 130/85 mmHg. All nephrotoxic drugs should be stopped and care should be exercised when administering ionic radiocontrast material to the patient. To prevent atherosclerotic vascular disease, the patient should be strongly advised against smoking, and strict control of serum cholesterol levels should be ensured (aim at LDL < 2.0 mmol/L). Global risk factor modification also involves strict control of blood pressure too.

5. Weight reduction—Should be promoted if the patient is overweight or obese. Losing 5–10 kg is of significant benefit. This can be achieved by joule restriction and regular exercise. A suitable form of exercise is brisk walking for at least 30 minutes a day, 4 days a week. Resistant cases may benefit from agents such as orlistat, which is an inhibitor of gastrointestinal lipase. Warn the patient about the side effects of greasy stool, frequency of defecation and bulky stool.

6. Family education and support—Do not forget to stress the importance of providing education and support to the patient’s family. Diabetes is best managed in a multidisciplinary setting with the participation of the physician, general practitioner, nurse educator, podiatrist, nutritionist and social worker.

7. In some jurisdictions the local department in charge of roads and traffic may require notification of a person’s diagnosis with diabetes.

Cholesterol target guidelines

Cholesterol-lowering drug therapy is indicated for any patient with a diagnosis of coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes with either age > 60 years or microalbuminuria or Aboriginal ethnicity or a significant family history of coronary heart disease at a younger age. These patients do not need a lipid level done prior to commencement of therapy.

OBESITY

Case vignette

A 45-year-old obese female is admitted after a suicide attempt with ingestion of and overdose of tricyclic antidepressant. She has recovered from the acute episode but complains of early morning headache of long-standing duration, exertional dyspnoea, bilateral knee pain on walking, lower back pain, cold intolerance and easy bruising. She has known diabetes mellitus managed on metformin and rosiglitazone. On examination she is obese with a BMI of 35. She is tachycardic at 100 bpm and hypertensive at 140/95 mmHg and there is a loud P2 in the precordium. There is evidence of hirsutism, acanthosis nigricans and bipedal oedema.

Approach to the patient

Obesity may be central to many a medical problem that a long case patient presents with. It may be an incidental observation, but obesity needs addressing if present. Obesity is associated with an increased all-cause mortality and in particular cardiovascular mortality. A BMI of > 30 is defined as obesity according to the US National Institute of Health criteria. A BMI of 19–25 is considered healthy and desirable.

image

Examination

Calculate the BMI and the waist-to-hip ratio. Check the exact distribution of fat. Check blood pressure. Look for features of any associated endocrinological disorder, such as
cushingoid body habitus, easy bruising and buffalo hump (suggestive of Cushing’s syndrome), peach complexion, goitre and bradycardia (suggestive of myxoedema), and
virilisation in a female patient (suggestive of polycystic ovary syndrome).

CORTICOSTEROID USE

Case vignette

A 74-year-old woman presents with recent weight gain, occasional blurred vision and polyuria. She has been commenced on prednisolone 25 mg daily for a recent diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. On examination she has cutaneous striae and evidence of easy bruising together with abdominal obesity and a moon facies.

Approach to the patient

History

When assessing patients commenced or maintained on long-term corticosteroid therapy, it is important to find out whether the patient is aware of the multiple adverse effects associated with such therapy and the precautionary measures that need to be taken to minimise such effects. If the patient has been on steroids for a considerable period of time, ask about weight gain, easy bruising, insomnia, polyphagia, ankle oedema, irritability and the psychological symptoms of depression or psychosis. Ask whether the patient has ever been tested for diabetes and, if so, how often and using which test. Also ask whether the patient’s blood pressure is monitored closely. Ask whether the patient has had cataracts diagnosed or experienced any visual impairment. Some patients may develop glaucoma associated with steroid use.
Corticosteroids at a dose higher than the replacement dose (equivalent of 7.5 mg per day of prednisolone) for more than 6 months can predispose the patient to osteoporosis, and it is important to enquire whether the patient has ever been diagnosed with osteoporosis and, if so, what treatment he or she has received. If not, ask whether they have ever had bone densitometry done. Ask about any fractures on minimum impact, and bone pain, and whether a radioisotope bone scan has been performed. Patients on corticosteroids benefit from calcium and vitamin D supplementation (steroids can impair vitamin D absorption in the gut) in addition to bisphosphonates and hormone replacement therapy in the setting of established osteoporosis. Ask about hip pain on movement, a feature that may suggest aseptic necrosis of the femoral head. Ask about infections, particularly atypical infections such as Pneumocystis carinii, cytomegalovirus infections, tuberculosis, Cryptococcus neoformans and recurrent oral and genital candidiasis.

Examination

It is highly recommended that these patients be regularly vaccinated with pneumococcal vaccine every 5 years and influenza vaccine every year.
Ask about any steroid-sparing agents that have been tried, and their effects.

OSTEOPOROSIS

Approach to the patient

History

Ask about back pain, any falls or fractures and the treatment received. Check whether the patient is on any therapeutic agents that would contribute to osteoporosis. Ask about family history of osteoporosis and enquire into the menopausal status. Postmenopausal osteoporosis is common, but do not forget other contributing factors relevant to the patient’s circumstances, such as chronic corticosteroid use, chronic renal failure, vitamin D deficiency, hyperthyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, multiple myeloma and Cushing’s syndrome.

Examination

Look for bone tenderness, vertebral column abnormalities and exclude physical signs of endocrine disorders such as Cushing’s syndrome.
Osteoporosis is common and the cause can be multifactorial. If clinical assessment suggests the existence of osteoporosis in the patient, ask the examiner for the report of the dual-energy X-ray densitometry (DEXA) study to establish a definite diagnosis. Candidates should be able to quickly and accurately interpret the Z and T scores in the bone densitometry report (Fig 9.1). A bone mineral density value lower than 1 standard deviation below the mean bone densitometry value of the young normal (T score < 1) should be considered an indication for the initiation of preventive measures. A T score of –2.5 or below is considered diagnostic of osteoporosis and an indication for treatment. A significantly abnormal Z score should alert the candidate to secondary causes of osteoporosis. Remember, most pathological fractures due to osteoporosis occur in the mid- and lower thoracic and upper lumbar regions of the vertebral column. Pathological fractures elsewhere in the vertebral column should arouse suspicion of other causes, such as malignancy.

Management

1. Correct the underlying cause, if there is one—this is the first step in the management of osteoporosis.

2. Education—educate and encourage the patient to adopt lifestyle measures that will prevent the progression of osteoporosis, such as ingestion of food with high calcium content, calcium supplements, adequate amounts of vitamin D, regular low-impact and weight-bearing physical exercise, cessation of smoking and reduction of alcohol intake. Postmenopausal women should aim at ingesting 1.5 g of calcium daily.

3. Pharmacology—pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis is a judicious decision that needs to be taken on further consideration of the patient’s clinical condition. If the bone mineral density is significantly low, or the patient is older, or if there is an established pathological fracture, the need for pharmacological intervention is significantly high, and hence can be justified:

Intermittent dosing of recombinant human parathyroid hormone (teriparatide) has been shown to benefit postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis. Anabolic steroids too have been shown to be beneficial in this group of patients.
Strontium ranelate is approved for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and has been shown to reduce vertebral and hip fractures.
Often a combination of different agents based on the clinical scenario is necessary to optimise the management of osteoporosis.

PAGET’S DISEASE

Approach to the patient

Paget’s disease is encountered in the long case patient, but often as an inactive disease condition. Usually the active disease presents with bone pain, deformity and pathological fracture.

History

Ask when and how the diagnosis was made and what treatment has been received so far. Ask about any change in hat size (though not many people wear hats these days!) or the size of spectacle frames, bone deformity, joint pain and symptoms of cardiac failure. By now you may have noticed whether the patient has any hearing impairment, which may be due to Paget’s disease of the ear ossicles or compression of the acoustic nerve. Check whether the patient suffers from ureteric colic.

Examination

Observe skull enlargement (skull diameter > 55 cm is abnormal), back deformity and limb deformity. Note lateral bowing of the femur and anterior bowing of the tibia. A bony mass lesion in the lower limb should alert the candidate to osteosarcoma. Auscultate for bruits in the skull and other bones. Look for osteoarthritis, particularly in the knees. Perform a detailed cardiovascular examination, looking for evidence of high-output cardiac failure. Conduct a detailed neurological examination, looking for deficit due to compression of cranial nerves at the cranial foramina and of brainstem due to platybasia. Look in the fundi for angioid streaks and optic atrophy.

Management

Symptomatic treatment is with analgesics, paracetamol or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
Disease-specific pharmacological treatment is indicated only if there is pain or active disease near a major joint or in a long bone.
The mainstay of treatment is oral bisphosphonates in the form of alendronate, tiludronate, risedronate or IV pamidronate. Calcitonin is used only rarely these days. Treatment should be continued until disease activity ceases, as indicated by symptoms and biochemical markers.

HYPERTHYROIDISM

Case vignette

A 61-year-old man presents with acute dyspnoea, delirium and high fevers after a CT coronary angiogram. He is agitated and has diarrhoea. On examination his blood pressure is 130/85 mmHg and pulse is 120 bpm and irregularly regular. He has diffuse crepitations in the lower zones of both lungs and pitting bipedal oedema. In the background history it is revealed that he has been investigated by his general practitioner for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, heat intolerance and recent weight loss.

Approach to the patient

The patient’s age may give some clues to the aetiology. Younger patients are more likely to get hyperthyroidism from Graves’ disease and older patients from toxic adenomata or toxic nodular goitres.

Examination

Look for warm, clammy skin and evidence of wasting/weight loss. Check the pulse for AF or tachycardia. Perform an eye examination, looking for lid retraction and lid lag. Patients with cardiac involvement may show evidence of heart failure. Perform a detailed neck examination, looking for a goitre and also lymphadenopathy. If a goitre is found, define the features in detail, including the size, consistency, tenderness and nodularity. Check the limbs for muscle weakness due to thyroid myopathy. Neurological examination shows brisk reflexes and a fine tremor of the upper extremities. Male patients may have gynaecomastia. Look in the extremities for clubbing-like thyroid acropachy and the nail bed for onycholysis. Patients with Graves’ disease may have the eye signs of exophthalmos, conjunctival oedema and periorbital oedema. They may also have skin infiltration manifesting as pretibial myxoedema.

HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY

Many patients in the long case examination may be on hormone replacement therapy (HRT). The question of continuation of this therapy may be a subject of interest in the discussion. HRT has proven benefits in the prevention and management of senile osteoporosis. There is observational evidence to support the usefulness of HRT in lowering LDL and lipoprotein-a and in elevating HDL levels, and therefore would seem to have a cardiovascular benefit. However, recently completed controlled trials have failed to demonstrate any objective benefits of HRT in improving the clinical end-points of cardiovascular disease. It has further demonstrated that HRT can increase the incidence of DVT and thromboembolism in some treated patients. Anecdotal risks of malignancies, too, should be acknowledged.
Raloxifene is a selective oestrogen receptor modulator that has shown promise as an alternative to conventional HRT. It acts as an oestrogen receptor agonist in the skeletal tissue and the cardiovascular system, and as an oestrogen receptor antagonist in the breast and the uterus. It is not very useful in the management of perimenopausal symptoms. The incidence of DVT with its use is similar to that of conventional hormonal therapy. The other distressing side effect of this agent is persistent cramps in the legs. Its main indication is for the prevention and treatment of senile osteoporosis. There are observational data supporting its beneficial effect on the serum lipid profile, but end-point data are still awaited. It has also been shown to be helpful in decreasing the incidence of breast cancer. The above information should help the clinician in making a decision regarding the continuation of HRT and deciding on an alternative if indicated.