Endocrinologically Silent Pituitary Tumors

Published on 13/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurosurgery

Last modified 13/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2445 times

Chapter 21 Endocrinologically Silent Pituitary Tumors

Epidemiology and Nomenclature

Accounting for approximately 15% to 20% of all intracranial neoplasms and being found in up to 27% of hypophyseal glands in autopsy studies and 22.5% of radiologic studies, pituitary adenomas are among the most frequent intracranial tumors. Most are pituitary incidentalomas and only a relatively small portion of such tumors become clinically evident.16

Once primarily classified according to their maximum diameter (microadenomas, <1 cm; macroadenomas, ≥1 cm), these tumors are further classified according to immunohistochemistry and functional status, since they display an array of hormonal and proliferative activity. Clinically silent pituitary adenomas (nonfunctioning, silent, or endocrine-inactive adenomas), which constitute the most frequent subtype of such pathologic entities, are pituitary adenomas that are not associated with syndromes of hormonal excess. They should not be preoperatively classified as nonsecretory adenomas, as it is known that after immunocytochemical studies, most produce one or more molecules, such as the α- or the β-subunits of the pituitary sexual glycoproteins (luteinizing hormone [LH], follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH]), in addition to the intact hormone; however, serum hormone levels may be not elevated, given that the secretion of such adenomas is often insufficient, incomplete, or inefficient.714 Such gonadotroph adenomas account for 40% to 50% of all macroadenomas and up to 80% of clinically endocrinologically silent pituitary tumors (Fig. 21-1). The rest of these tumors is constituted by the true nonsecreting adenomas (“null-cell adenomas” in immunohistochemical and ultrastructural classifications) (Fig. 21-2) and adenomas that secrete an incomplete or mutated form of other pituitary hormones (“silent ACTH-omas,” “silent GH-omas,” and so on according to immunohistochemical and ultrastructural classifications).

We will not consider in this chapter the other sellar masses, whether tumoral and nontumoral, such as Rathke’s cleft cysts, meningiomas (from the tuberculum sellae, diaphragma sellae, cavernous sinus, clivus), chordomas, germinomas, and so on, which are not adenomas originating from the pituitary gland. These other lesions may be misdiagnosed as nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas and require an accurate preoperative differential diagnosis.

Clinical and Anatomic Features

By definition, endocrinologically silent pituitary tumors do not cause symptoms related to hormone hypersecretion. Rather, their clinical presentation is dominated by mass effect symptoms. Consequently, the vast majority of them are not recognized until they become sizable macroadenomas. As a matter of fact, according to recent reports,15,16 almost all such tumors are macroadenomas (96.5%) and the main presenting symptoms are visual defects (67.8%) and headache (41.4%), and the most frequent pituitary deficit is hypogonadism (43.3%).

Visual Symptoms

Among the most common of such symptoms are the visual deficits, either qualitative and/or quantitative. Such symptoms are related to the suprasellar expansion of the pituitary tumor, with compression and distortion of the optic chiasm and consequent chiasmatic syndrome. That is characterized by visual field defect (classically, incomplete to complete bitemporal hemianopia) due to the compression of the nasal retinal fibers (Fig. 21-3). The deficit of one or of both the temporal hemi-fields begins in such a subdolous manner that it is not appraisable by the patient, in the superior temporal quadrants, progressing towards the bottom in a counterclockwise direction, for the left eye and in a clockwise sense for the right eye. Other perimetric defects are seldom present, such as binasal perimetric defects, resulting from a lateral compression of the chiasm; bilateral altitudinal hemianopia, from a lesion to the superior fibers or to the inferior ones, the latter being involved with greater frequency; homonymous hemianopia, because of the involvement of the posterior portion of the chiasm; and monocular perimetric defects.

Besides the visual field deficits, loss of vision of various degrees, even to blindness, may be present. The visus, especially in the initial stages, when the tumor does not compress the fibers originating from the macula (which are situated in the posterior-median portion of the chiasm), may be preserved. The reduction of visual acuity is often unilateral or is not the same in both eyes. More rare is palsy of the eye musculature, palpebral ptosis, ophthalmoplegia, and diplopia due to the adenomatous mass growing laterally, compressing and/or invading the cavernous sinus and therefore the oculomotor nerves. Another impairment of the ocular motility that could be encountered is a dissociated vertical-pendular nistagmus (see-saw nystagmus), sometimes associated with bitemporal hemianopia, and thought to be related to a lesion of Cajal’s interstitial nucleus. A splitting of the images could also be present in the absence of any muscular palsy, and this symptom is due to the fact that for the patient with bitemporal hemianopia, vision is missing in the outer (temporal or lateral) half of both the right and left visual fields.

Headache

Another common symptom caused by endocrinologically silent pituitary tumors is headache, which does not seem to be correlated with the size of the adenoma.17 Such symptom is due to the stretching of the diaphragma sellae and/or the medial wall of the cavernous sinuses, caused by an even mild or moderate intrasellar hypertension.18

Pituitary Apoplexy

Pituitary apoplexy is a relatively rare condition presenting with sudden headache, acute visual loss, ophthalmoplegia, altered level of consciousness, lethargy, and even collapse from acute adrenal insufficiency. It is caused by a hemorrhage into the tumor and/or its acute necrosis, with subsequent swelling and frequent spreading into the subarachnoid space, leading to other signs of meningeal irritation (Fig. 21-4). Clinical conditions or precipitating factors that are associated with an increased risk for such occurrence are coronary artery surgery and other major surgery, pregnancy, anticoagulant or antiaggregant therapy, and coagulopathies.19 The related acute and severe clinical syndrome demands glucocorticoid replacement and surgical decompression, usually trans-sphenoidal, if visual loss is severe and progressive. These patients typically require a full hormonal replacement therapy in the perioperative period. If the patient has a subclinical or a mild form of apoplexy and is clinically stable, it is prudent to measure the serum prolactin, since some patients with prolactinoma present in this fashion and may be successfully treated with medical therapy.

Preoperative Evaluation

Global management of pituitary masses usually involves a multidisciplinary team. Thus, an accurate, complete, balanced, and global preoperative evaluation of these patients is critical, including diagnostic and clinical tests and laboratory investigations, to minimize surgical risks and optimize the outcome.

Neuroradiologic Evaluation

A correct neuroradiologic evaluation of a patient with a nonfunctioning pituitary mass is mandatory. The aim of the neuroradiologic study of a suspected pituitary mass is mainly based on the evaluation of the characteristics of the lesion (origin, structure, extension, and relationships) and the shape and location of the residual pituitary gland. Its purposes follow:

The gold standard among the radiologic studies available is the magnetic resonance imaging. A complete MR protocol should include, at least T1- and T2-weighted images and T1-weighted postcontrast (postgadolinium) images (Fig. 21-5) in the three orthogonal planes and 3-mm thick sections.20 Complementary MR sequences are also useful, such as dynamic sequences; MR angiography, namely when one suspects the vascular nature of a lesion; diffusion-weighted and/or perfusion-weighted MRI; and MR spectroscopy (Fig. 21-6).

Fibrous adenomas are encountered in approximately 10% of cases21 and can be difficult to remove via the conventional trans-sphenoidal approach. In such cases, preoperative MRI may be useful in anticipating tumor consistency and allow planning of the surgical strategy correctly. Tumors with a hypo- or iso-intense appearance on T2-weighted MRI may be indicative of greater collagen content2123 and a more fibrous tumor consistency. In contrast, softer tumors are hyperintense on T2 (Fig. 21-7).

When a trans-sphenoidal approach is foreseen—especially the endonasal variant—axial and coronal CT scanning may be helpful in addition to an accurate assessment of the anatomy of the nasal cavities and the paranasal sinuses and for the definition of the best route from the nasal cavity toward the sella, since MR imaging alone does not provide the necessary detail of bone anatomy.20 Axial and coronal CT scanning allows the neurosurgeon to more easily assess the three-dimensional (3D) aspects of the nasal and paranasal cavities, particularly the sphenoid bone, and the relationships with the sellar floor and carotid canals. CT study is essential in order to reveal the presence of eventual anatomic variations or pathologic changes of the cavities. Moreover, CT remains the diagnostic imaging study of choice in patients who are unable to undergo an MR study.

Although analysis of axial and coronal scans gives a detailed true depiction of rhino-sinusal anatomy, the 3D virtual endoscopy yields images similar to those provided by actual endoscopy, giving the surgeon a view before the operation and avoiding the complex task of mental reconstruction in the space of images obtained on traditional scan planes20,24 (Fig. 21-8).

Ophthalmologic Evaluation

The ophthalmologist’s evaluation is of utmost importance when a suprasellar lesion is suspected, in all the stages of the disease from the diagnosis to the pre- and post-operative evaluation.25 The visual field evaluation, by means of either the manual kinetic technique or the computerized threshold static perimetry (Fig. 21-3) and the study of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) are the most suitable exams to show eventual functional deficits due to chiasmatic involvement, as well as to monitor the preservation or vision recovery after surgery. VEPs are useful in the evaluation of the pharmacologic or surgical treatment, rather than for routine diagnostic purposes, where the basic test was and still remains the field exam. The examination of chromatic sensibility is not considered a routine investigation, but it should be performed in cases where the field evaluation and VEPs are normal, but there is still suspicion of chiasmatic compression based on neuroradiologic studies.

Management

Medical Management

The medical approach to clinically silent pituitary adenomas has improved in recent years due to the availability of effective, well tolerated and safe molecules able to reduce, in some instances, the tumor mass.

It is now verified, by immunocytochemistry and ultrastructural studies, that the majority of such tumors are glycoprotein-producing, followed by nonfunctioning somatotroph, lactotroph, or corticotroph adenomas.16 As a matter of facts, a large proportion of nonfunctioning adenomas (up to 90%) is shown to secrete low amounts of either intact FSH and LH and/or their α- and β-subunits and the vast majority of nonfunctioning adenomas also express on cell membranes different subtypes of somatostatin and dopamine receptors (respectively, sst1-sst5 and D1-D5) in a variable amount. Based on this feature, both dopamine agonists and somatostatin analogues have a rationale in the treatment of such tumors and such fact has opened a new perspective of medical treatment for these lesions.

Somatostatin Receptors and Their Role

Somatostatin (growth hormone-inhibiting hormone [GHIH] or somatotropin release–inhibiting factor [SRIF]) is a peptide hormone that regulates the endocrine system and affects neurotransmission and cell proliferation via interaction with G-protein–coupled somatostatin receptors and inhibition of the release of numerous secondary hormones. It is classified as an inhibitory hormone. Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) have been used in clinical practice over the past 20 years. They act through the somatostatin receptors, which have been demonstrated to be highly expressed in all pituitary adenomas with a predominance of sst2 and sst5 and infrequent expression of sst416,2628 Another analogue, the slow-release lanreotide (LAN), showing a similar receptor affinity for sst to that of OCT, was made available for intramuscular injections every 7 to 14 days. More recently, OCT and LAN have been made available for injections either intramuscular or subcutaneous every 28 to 56 days, respectively. The response to octreotide and lanreotide is predicted by the expression of sst216,29 In nonfunctioning adenomas the receptor subtype expressed in a higher amount was found to be the sst3 followed by the sst2, also correlated with sst5 expression.30 The expression of sst2 and sst5 in nonfunctioning adenomas has been found to be associated with reduced cell viability by 20% to 80% (in 8 of 13 sst2-positive tumors) and by 15% to 80% (in 10 of 13 tumors, all but three sst5 positive).31 More recently, pasireotide (SOM230), a somatostatin analogue binding sst1-3 and sst5, completely abrogated the promoting effects of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) on nonfunctioning adenoma cell viability.32

Only few clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate potential effects of SSA in patients with nonfunctioning adenomas. However, a meta-analysis of such data revealed that tumor reduction was reported only in 12% of cases, while the vast majority of patients had stable remnant tumors.16 A still unexplained finding reported by some authors33,34 is that OCT treatment was followed by a rapid improvement in headache and visual disturbances, without any change in tumor volume. This effect was likely not owing to a direct effect on tumor size but more likely to a direct effect on the retina and the optic nerve.35 However, approximately in one third of the patients there was an improvement in visual field defects.16

Dopamine Receptors and Their Role

Dopamine receptors, namely the D2 subtype, in the normal pituitary mediate the tonic inhibitory control of PRL secretion36 by dopamine.37 A meta-analysis of several studies16 has shown the presence of dopamine binding sites (most likely D2) in nonfunctioning adenomas. Furthermore, in gonadotropin-immunopositive adenomas, the D2 were mainly localized in LH- and FSH-immunopositive cells.38 Anyway, the D2 receptor is not the only dopamine receptor expressed in the pituitary gland. Indeed, the D4 receptor, in particular its D4.4 variant, is also expressed, although its role in the physiology of the pituitary gland is not known.39 Cabergoline is the actual most commonly used dopamine agonist, able to inhibit in vitro the α-subunit concentration in 56% of cases and such result was associated with D2 expression,40 while the tumor shrinkage after DA therapy is 27.6%.16

A recent study of our group40 demonstrated that 1-year treatment with cabergoline at the dose of 3 mg/wk induced a more than 25% tumor shrinkage in 56% of patients with histologically proven nonfunctioning adenomas and such shrinkage was significantly correlated with the expression of the D2 isoform. The counterpart of such evidence was the finding of tumor regrowth after stopping the dopamine-agonist treatment,41 thus supporting the use of such treatment in these subjects.