EC-IC and IC-IC Bypass for Giant Aneurysms Using the ELANA Technique

Published on 08/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurosurgery

Last modified 08/03/2015

Print this page

This article have been viewed 1813 times

28 EC-IC and IC-IC Bypass for Giant Aneurysms Using the ELANA Technique

Albert van der Zwan, Tristan P.C. van Doormaal, Luca Regli, Cees A.F. Tulleken

Natural history

Giant intracranial aneurysms, approximately 5% of all intracranial aneurysms, are one of the most challenging lesions in neurosurgery. By definition their fundus size is 2.5 cm or larger, and they are predominantly located in those proximal parts of the vascular tree with high blood flow, such as the internal carotid artery (cavernous and supraclinoid ICA), the proximal middle cerebral artery (MCA), the basilar artery (BA), and vertebral artery (VA). Two-thirds of these aneurysms are located in the anterior circulation and are slightly more common in the female population. Approximately 8% present in the pediatric age, but most commonly they become manifest during the fifth to seventh decades. Most of these aneurysms (20% to 70%) present with rupture and they have the same re-rupture rate as other smaller aneurysms.^1,² The second most common presentation is the mass effect of the aneurysm causing ocular movement disturbances due to cranial nerve palsies, vision or vision field loss and focal weakness/gait disorders, headaches and seizures. Third, approximately 8% of giant aneurysms present with ischemic syndromes most likely due to embolic phenomena originating from the aneurysm sac to more distally located vascular territories. The natural history of these aneurysms is very poor with high morbidity and mortality rates between 65% to 85% within 2 years after discovery.^1,²

Therefore, effective treatment of these lesions is life-saving. However, this asks tremendous and intensive investment in pretreatment diagnostics and considerations regarding the two aims that are the most important in the treatment of giant aneurysms: the permanent exclusion of the aneurysm from the circulation and the relief of mass effect that in some cases also plays a role in symptomatology.

Therapeutic modalities

Many treatment modalities are extensively discussed in literature like Hunterian ligation, endovascular coiling, gluing, stenting, coiling, reconstructive clipping, trapping, and parent vessel replacement bypass surgery, or combinations of these treatment modalities. Reliable comparative analysis of all these treatment modalities, however, is difficult due to small numbers, variable secondary circumstances, and no standardization of results or outcomes.

Endovascular Treatment

As primary clipping can be technically very difficult or impossible, the endovascular approach to these aneurysms has been increasingly popular. Although in smaller aneurysms endovascular treatment has proven to be effective in many cases, the results of endovascular treatment of giant aneurysms are still very disappointing.^3,⁴ Endovascular Hunterian obstruction in the case of a giant ICA aneurysm of the parent vessel seems to be the most effective and simplest method of treatment. The functionality of the ICA and its intracranial collaterals as the circle of Willis and the leptomeningeals should be thoroughly evaluated before definitive occlusion. Therefore, at our center in patients harboring these aneurysms, first a balloon test occlusion (BTO) of the ICA is performed with venous outflow study to observe if the patient tolerates definitive ICA occlusion. If the patient clinically does not tolerate the occlusion, or if asymmetry in venous outflow is over 1 second, a replacement bypass procedure is planned before definitive ICA occlusion. In more distal giant aneurysms, however, BTO is less reliable due to the complexity of the aneurysm and its afferent arteries. In the explicit review of Parkinson et al., a total of 316 patients with giant aneurysms treated endovascularly using coils, parent vessel occlusion, Onyx®, stenting with or without coil or Onyx® were reviewed. In only 57% of patients was a complete occlusion or cure achieved, with 7.7% mortality and 17.2% major neurological morbidity.² In addition, in distally located giant aneurysms the results of endovascular treatment are poor.⁴ Endosaccular coiling proves to be an ineffective long-term treatment of these aneurysms due to recanalization and further aneurysm growth. Parent vessel occlusion can be considered, but risks of late ischemia remain relatively large. Selective embolization of these distal giant aneurysms harbors high complication risks (20% mortality). In those cases, especially in more distal giant aneurysms of the MCA, ACA, and PCA where mass effects also play a role in symptomatology, endovascular treatment seems to be less effective.

Parent Vessel Replacement Bypass Surgery

No major reviews on results of flow replacement bypass surgery are available but smaller series are available.^5,⁶ From these studies the results of parent artery bypass surgery using mostly VSM or radial arterial grafts with consequent trapping or proximal occluding with or without additional endovascular therapy seem to be more promising than the results of endovascular treatment alone.

Before planning bypass surgery it is mandatory to determine the amount of flow to be replaced by the bypass. As most giant aneurysms are located in the more proximal cerebropetal arteries conducting high flows like the ICA, MCA, ACA, BA, and VA, the flow to be replaced by any bypass is most highly dependent on the functional capacity of the Circle of Willis and collaterals as the leptomeningeal vessels, ophthalmic artery, and choroidal plexus. Exact determination of flow needed to replace is therefore hard to make. However, in case of BTO failure in a giant ICA aneurysm, it seems to be safe to choose for a bypass type with potential high flows. In cases of giant MCA, ACA, BA, or VA aneurysms the flows to be replaced in the parent arteries should be determined using single vessel flow MRA flowmetry or multivessel NOVA technique (VasSol®).⁷^–⁹Consequently, partially based on these data a custom made plan for an EC-IC or IC-IC bypass has to be defined to rebuild vascular architecture. The anatomy must be studied in detail to determine which vessels are approachable for bypass grafting. Currently, conventional angiography, and CT perfusion and MRA are used to study this.

Before bypass attachment, intraoperative quantitative flow measurements are performed on different intracerebral arteries using a dedicated flow meter (Transonic®, Ithaca, NY), again to assess the flow, which has to be replaced by the bypass. If we use the superficial temporal artery (STA) as a donor, cut flow is measured before bypass completion to use in the cut flow index.¹⁰

In aneurysms located more distally, like on the P2 or M3, we measured medium-high flows and replaced the flows using a conventional STA-MCA or STA-PCA bypass based on pre- and intra-operative flow measurements where the aneurysm was trapped. The flows in the bypasses ranged between 30 and 60 cc/min after trapping. In more proximally located aneurysms like the ICA, MCA, BA, and VA, the flows to be replaced can measure up to 180 cc/min. In those cases, a high-flow bypass on the proximal arteries to replace these amounts of flow has to be considered.

It is important here to recall Poiseuille’s law, which says that flow varies proportionally to the pressure drop over the bypass, the length of the bypass, and the fourth power of the radius: Q = π r4 P/8μL (Q = flow rate; r = radius of pipe; P = pressure drop over the pipe; μ = viscosity of fluid; L = length of the pipe). For example, because cortical vessel and the STA have a relatively small diameter, the possible flow through the conventional STA-cortical MCA bypass is limited to 10 to 40 cc/min. Increased flows of 84 to 100 mL/min are possible when the STA is connected to the larger M3.¹¹ High flows of 130 to 200 cc/min can be achieved when a venous or arterial interponate is used to connect the ECA with the intracranial ICA. So, in cases where higher flows are needed, a more proximal anastomosis should be made. However, anastomosing techniques on more proximally located arteries are technically demanding for surgeons and anesthesiologists. The conventional anastomosing technique with temporal occlusion of the major cerebral arteries theoretically provides an extra risk of ischemia during the classical procedure, and measures to prevent hypothermia and cardiac arrest and pentothal protection are described to minimize this risk. To circumvent this risk, the ELANA technique was developed by our senior author (Tulleken).

The elana technique

The ELANA technique (Figure 28–1) facilitates the construction of an end-to-side anastomosis without temporary occlusion of the recipient artery. It was primarily developed for cerebral augmentative revascularization (1992); however, it turned out that the technique was also quite feasible for creating protective or replacement bypasses.¹²^–¹⁵ A vein (mostly the vena saphena magna, VSM) or artery (radial artery, RA) can be used as the donor vessel. The inner diameter should be minimally 2 mm to enable the laser catheter to pass through the donor vessel. First, depending on the size of the recipient vessel, a platinum ring of 2.6 mm or 2.8 mm is attached to the distal segment of the donor vessel using eight microsutures (see Figures 28–1A through 28–1C). The ring with the attached distal donor segment is subsequently stitched end-to-side to the recipient using again eight microsutures (see Figure 28–1D). This is followed by the passing of the ELANA 2.0® laser suction catheter down the lumen of the open donor vessel. The tip of the catheter is placed against the sidewall of the recipient vessel (see Figure 28–1E and Figure 28–2). After 2 minutes of active suctioning from the dedicated inside portion of the catheter, the laser fibers on the outside of the catheter are activated within 5 seconds. The laser broaches the recipient arterial wall and separates an arteriotomy flap from the recipient (see Figure 28–1F). The suction portion of the catheter maintains contact with the small arteriotomy flap, thus preventing its migration into the lumen of the recipient.

Figure 28–1 Schematic drawing of ELANA anastomosis. A to C, Vein attached to platinum ring using eight ethilon 8/0 stitches. D, Attachment of vein/ring to intracranial artery. E, Introducing laser catheter through vein and lasing out flap. F, Withdrawal of catheter with flap.

(Redrawn from van Doormaal TP, van der Zwan A, Verweij BH, Langer DJ, Tulleken CA: Treatment of giant and large internal carotid artery aneurysms with a high-flow replacement bypass using the excimer laser-assisted nonocclusive anastomosis technique, Neurosurgery 2008;62:1414, with permission.)

Figure 28–2 ELANA laser catheter tip.

A major advantage of this procedure is the nonocclusive character of the anastomosis, and to our knowledge this is the first nonocclusive anastomosis technique in neurosurgery. Second, for creating this nonocclusive type of anastomosis less intracranial arterial exposure is needed as no temporal clips are used. Third, no measures as hypothermia are needed, as the complete procedure is nonischemic. Fourth, as there is no exposure to the ring and maximally four through-the-vessel-microsutures are needed, adequate re-endothelialization is achieved.¹⁶ Due to these characteristics safe anastomoses can be made on proximal recipients (ICA, proximal MCA, proximal ACA, P1, and BA) (Figure 28–3A through 28–3E) and various bypass types have been constructed (Figure 28–4). At our institute more than 300 patients and worldwide a large cohort of more than 400 patients were treated using the ELANA technique between 1992 and 2010 with good results and good long-term patency rates (up to 93%). After finalizing the ELANA technique in the form described, we treated 265 patients with large and giant aneurysms since 1999. These aneurysms were located in the cavernous ICA, supraclinoid ICA, ICA bifurcation, proximal MCA, proximal ACA, BA, and at the VA-BA junction. Although this technique introduces the major advantage of its nonocclusiveness and therefore the absence of intraoperative stress moments of temporal occlusion of major arteries, the technical challenges are mainly formed by the stitching of the donor vessel with the ring on the recipient vessel, most often deep intracranially. Mainly as the result of this part of the procedure, one ELANA anastomosis takes between 90 to 120 minutes, depending on its location and the neurosurgeon’s experience.

Figure 28–3 Angiography of ELANA anastomoses. A, On ICA. B, ICA bifurcation. C, A1. D, MCA bifurcation. E, Basilar artery.

Figure 28–4 Different types of ELANA bypasses.

Therefore, ELANA training sessions organized at our institute are mandatory for future ELANA neurosurgeons. In addition, for every vascular neurosurgeon, regular lab training sessions are obligatory for maintaining and developing adequate microvascular skills using ELANA techniques. Further developments of the ELANA technique will focus on safe, sutureless, and minimally invasive techniques to make this technique easier and consequently shorten the procedure.

Perioperative preparation and monitoring

Preoperative Flow Measurements

For preoperative planning of surgery, bypass indication, type of bypass and location, and an estimation of the flow to be replaced can be made by using single-vessel flow MRA flowmetry or multivessel NOVA technique (VasSol®). At our institute, only single-vessel MRA flowmetry is available, and this technique is also used for postoperative evaluation of bypass flow.⁹

Anticoagulation Strategy

Although in the early years of our experience we did not administer anticoagulation medication preoperatively to avoid hemorrhagic complications during surgery, over 4 years ago we began to premedicate patients with acetylsalicylic acid (80 mg/day) 3 days before surgery. Heparin is administered intraoperatively intravenously by bolus injection (1000 IU) at the moment that the bypass is opened. During the rest of the procedure, an extra bolus of 1000 IU heparin is administered approximately every 2 to 3 hours. At the end of the surgery, the median quantity of intraoperatively administered heparin is 2000 IU (range, 1000 to 5000 IU). Postoperatively, all patients receive bypass thrombosis prophylaxis. From 1999 to 2002, this was achieved with 50 g/day dextran 40 (Rheomacrodex; Medisan Pharmaceuticals, Parsippany, NJ) and, from 2002 on, with 15,000 IU/day of heparin. Both of these medications were administered during the 3 days in the intensive care unit. After 3 days, they were stopped, and one daily dose of acetylsalicylic acid (80 mg) was administered. We changed this postoperative protocol over 4 years ago, however, and only acetylsalicylic acid is continued directly after surgery.

Intraoperative Flow Measurements

In all procedures since 1998 we intraoperatively measured flow through parent vessels, distal efferent vessels, and the bypass using a dedicated flow meter (Transonic®, Ithaca, NY).⁹ Especially in flow replacement bypass surgery it is important to measure the flow in the artery that is to be replaced. In addition, after bypass completion, it is important to monitor bypass flow during parent vessel occlusion and aneurysm trapment to measure the increase in the flow through the bypass during these maneuvers. Any complication, such as kinking of the bypass, compression of the bypass during closure, or thrombosis of the bypass, can be detected by flow monitoring during the rest of the procedure until the end of closure.

Intraoperative Near-Infrared Indocyanine Green Video Angiography (ICGA)

Before and after bypass construction as well as during aneurysm trapment or reconstruction, the use of indocyanine green video angiography (ICGA)¹⁷ can be very useful to monitor involvement of perforating arteries. Although this method is not replacing intraoperative DSA, which is not available in our hospital, it can be very helpful as long as it is taken into account that this method can only be used on those vessels in the field of surgery that are visible, and that deeper vessels are missed.