Drugs for inflammation and joint disease

Published on 02/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Basic Science

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2455 times

Chapter 16 Drugs for inflammation and joint disease

Introduction

The immune system is a complex of interrelated genetic, molecular and cellular components that provides defence against invading microorganisms and aberrant native cells, and repairs tissues once the pathogen is eradicated. The central process by which these are achieved is inflammation: the sequence of events by which a pathogen is detected, cells of the immune system are recruited, the pathogen is eliminated and resulting tissue damage repaired.

Inflammation is appropriate as a response to physical damage, microbial infection or malignancy. A number of illnesses result from abnormal activation or prolongation of the immune response. These include allergy (hay fever, asthma), autoimmunity (rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)), and allograft rejection.

Anti-inflammatory drugs, by acting on and modifying the response of the innate immune system to a challenge, are useful in many settings to damp down an over-exuberant or pathologically prolonged inflammatory response. Immunomodulatory agents, which act on components of the adaptive immune response, are important for the treatment of complex autoimmune diseases and in preventing allograft rejection. Many drugs used in the treatment of these diseases have complex mechanisms of action, working on multiple arms of the immune response, and in some cases the principal way in which they exert their effects is not clear. Partly this is due to the complexity of the immune system itself; many components have overlapping functions, leading to redundancy, and many have several apparently unrelated actions.

Research over the last few decades has vastly improved our appreciation of the complexity of the immune system and of the pathogenesis of many autoimmune diseases. Although there does not appear to be one single factor that leads inexorably to the development or perpetuation of any inflammatory disease, certain mediators that play central roles in specific diseases have been identified. The advent of monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins and other new drug development technology has allowed the manufacture of a rapidly expanding group of new agents (‘biologicals’) that target specific components of the immune response thought to be driving particular diseases. These drugs have dramatically changed treatment paradigms, and hopefully will lead to significant improvements in the future outlook for patients suffering rheumatic disease.

Inflammation

The process of acute inflammation is initiated when resident tissue leucocytes (macrophages or mast cells) detect a challenge, for example pathogenic bacteria, or monosodium urate crystals in the case of gout. This sets off a cascade of intracellular signalling that results in activation of the cell, release of soluble cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor-α (TNFα), interleukin-1 (IL-1) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) and other mediators such as histamine and prostaglandins. IL-1, IL-6 and TNFα stimulate endothelial cells at the site of injury to express cellular adhesion molecules, which attract and bind circulating leucocytes, principally neutrophils, and induce them to leave the circulation and migrate into the affected area. They also have systemic effects such as the development of fever and the production of acute phase proteins including C-reactive protein (CRP).

Neutrophils, along with macrophages, phagocytose the injurious stimulus and destroy it. Neutrophils and macrophages may also cause damage to the surrounding host tissue through the release of digesting enzymes such as matrix metalloproteinases and collagenases. The inflammatory process therefore needs to be halted rapidly once the invading organism has been cleared. This occurs partly because neutrophils have a very short lifespan and die quickly once they have left the circulation, and partly through the release of anti-inflammatory mediators.

Several drugs in current use act on the various stages of this inflammatory process. Antagonists of TNFα, IL-1 and IL-6 are available (see Biologic agents, p. 253). Colchicine, used in the treatment of gout, interferes with neutrophil chemotaxis, thus inhibiting their recruitment to the site of inflammation.

Many leucocytes, including mast cells and macrophages, as well as endothelial cells, synthesise pro-inflammatory eicosanoids and platelet-activating factor (PAF) (Fig. 16.1). These are 20-carbon unsaturated fatty acids derived from phospholipid substrates in the plasma membrane by the enzymes phospholipase A2, cyclo-oxygenase (COX) and lipo-oxygenase (which are induced by IL-1). The prostaglandins, thromboxanes and leukotrienes have diverse pro-inflammatory roles. Leukotrienes promote the activation and accumulation of leucocytes at sites of inflammation. Prostaglandins induce vasodilatation of the microcirculation and are important in pain signalling from locally inflamed tissue. Platelet-activating factor and thromboxane A2 affect the coagulation and fibrinolytic cascades. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including aspirin, inhibit COX and hence prostaglandin and thromboxane synthesis. Glucocorticoids act by inducing the synthesis of lipocortin-1, a polypeptide that inhibits phospholipase A2, and thereby exert a broad anti-inflammatory effect. The leukotriene receptor antagonists montelukast and zafirlukast cause bronchodilatation and are used to treat asthma.

The adaptive immune response

The adaptive immune response, although integrated into the process of inflammation, becomes active at later stages. Its key properties are (1) specificity: each B and T lymphocyte recognises a single specific peptide sequence; and (2) memory: when an invading pathogen has been recognised once, a small number of specific cells remain dormant within the lymph tissue for many years. If that pathogen is detected again, a very rapid response is mounted to eradicate it before the development of clinical symptoms.

An adaptive immune response is initiated when a helper T cell recognises a peptide antigen presented on the surface of an antigen-presenting cell (APC) and is activated (Fig. 16.2). The activated helper T cell is then able to activate other types of T cell and B cells. This results in the proliferation of adaptive cellular effectors, the generation and release of antibodies by plasma cells and the production of a range of cytokines by the participating leucocytes. On occasion, amplification loops may become self-perpetuating, leading to chronic autoimmune disease.

Many immunomodulatory drugs, such as the calcineurin inhibitors, seek to break these loops by inhibiting lymphocyte proliferation. Other newer approaches target specific components of the immune system. For example, rituximab binds CD20, a cell surface molecule found only on B lymphocytes and not memory cells. It is used to treat diseases in which pathogenic autoantibody production is prominent, such as rheumatoid arthritis and SLE. Abatacept blocks co-stimulatory signals, which are required when a helper T cell is activated, by recognising bound antigen presented by an APC. This is a central process in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis, and abatacept is licensed to treat this.

Pharmacological manipulation of inflammatory mediators

Mode of action

GCs, being lipophilic, diffuse across the cell membrane and bind the cytosolic glucocorticoid receptor (GR) (Fig. 16.3). Receptor polymorphisms influence the strength of the receptor interaction, and represent one source of variation in sensitivity to exogenous steroids. Once bound, the GC-GR complex translocates to the nucleus where it acts in at least two ways to alter gene transcription:

At the cellular level, GCs reduce the numbers of circulating lymphocytes, eosinophils and monocytes. This is maximal 4–6 hours after administration and is achieved by a combination of apoptosis induction and inhibition of proliferation. Chronic administration of GC is associated with a neutrophilia caused by release of neutrophils from the bone marrow and reduced adherence to vascular walls.

In inflammatory disease, the choice of GC preparation will reflect the site and the extent of inflamed tissue, e.g. oral or parenteral for systemic disease, inhaled in asthma, topical in cutaneous, ocular, oral or rectal disease. Different corticosteroid preparations, their pharmacokinetics, modes of delivery and adverse effects are discussed elsewhere, except for the management of steroid-induced osteoporosis, which is found in the section on management of rheumatoid arthritis at the end of this chapter.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)

NSAIDs are an extremely widely prescribed group of drugs that are mainly used for their analgesic effects. They possess a single common mode of action: inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase, thereby reducing prostaglandin synthesis. This is also the mode of action of paracetamol (acetaminophen) and aspirin.

Recently concern has arisen over the effect of traditional NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors on the cardiovascular system, with analysis of the VIGOR1 study showing that rofecoxib in particular increases the risk of myocardial infarction (rofecoxib has since been withdrawn from use). While they retain an important role in the treatment of acute gout, inflammatory arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and dysmenorrhea, long-term prescription should only be undertaken following a full discussion with the patient regarding the balance of risks and benefits.

Pharmacokinetics

NSAIDs are absorbed almost completely from the gastrointestinal tract, tend not to undergo first-pass elimination (see p. 87), are highly protein bound and have small volumes of distribution. Their t½ values in plasma tend to group into short (1–5 h) or long (10–60 h). Differences in t½ are not necessarily reflected proportionately in duration of effect, as peak and trough drug concentrations at their intended site of action following steady-state dosing are much less than those in plasma. The vast majority of NSAIDs are weak organic acids and localise preferentially in the synovial tissue of inflamed joints (see pH partition hypothesis, p. 80).

Uses

Adverse effects

Gastrointestinal

Dyspepsia is one of the commonest side-effects of NSAIDs. The propensity to gastrointestinal (GI) ulceration may result in occult or overt blood loss. Use of NSAIDs is associated with an approximately four-fold increased incidence of severe gastrointestinal haemorrhage, and such complications account for between 700 and 2000 deaths in the UK each year. In addition, ulceration and stricture of the small intestine can result in anaemia, diarrhoea and malabsorption, similar to Crohn’s disease. The risk of NSAID-induced GI haemorrhage is associated with high doses and prolonged use, age over 65 years, previous history of peptic ulceration, concomitant use of glucocorticoids, anticoagulants or other NSAIDs, heavy smoking and alcohol use, and the presence of Helicobacter pylori infection.

NSAID-associated gastrointestinal disease appears to result from the inhibition of COX–1-mediated production of cytoprotective mucosal prostaglandins, especially PGI2 and PGE2, which inhibit acid secretion in the stomach, promote mucus production and enhance mucosal perfusion. Several large randomised controlled trials have investigated the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects in traditional NSAIDs compared with coxibs. The VIGOR (rofecoxib versus naproxen), CLASS3 (celecoxib versus ibuprofen and diclofenac) and TARGET4 (lumiracoxib versus ibuprofen and naproxen) studies all indicate that coxib use leads to an approximately 50% reduction of upper gastrointestinal adverse events.

The gastrointestinal toxicity of traditional NSAIDs may be reduced by co-prescription of a proton pump inhibitor, e.g. omeprazole, an H2-receptor blocker, e.g. ranitidine, or the prostaglandin analogue misoprostol. Proton pump inhibitors are more effective than the other classes of gastroprotective agent and should be considered in all patients with at least one of the above risk factors. In fact, it is now recommended by the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Effectiveness (NICE) that all patients over 45 years prescribed an NSAID, whether COX-2 selective or not, also receive a proton pump inhibitor.

Cardiovascular

The VIGOR and APPROVE5 trials reported increased thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients treated with rofecoxib, leading to concerns about a class effect of the coxibs. It was suggested that COX-2 selectivity resulted in an imbalance between prostacyclin and thromboxane production, an effect which would not be seen with traditional NSAIDs which inhibited the synthesis of both equally. Subsequent data from the prospective MEDAL6 and TARGET trials have not supported a class effect based on COX-2 selectivity. These studies suggest that treatment with either a coxib or an NSAID results in a small increase in cardiovascular risk. The risk is dose-related and rofecoxib, particularly at doses exceeding 50 mg per day, confers the highest cardiovascular risk in the majority of studies. A recent study of more than 1 million patients quantified cardiovascular risk as a composite of coronary death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and fatal and non-fatal stroke, and reported that diclofenac and rofecoxib were associated with the highest cardiovascular risk, while naproxen and perhaps celecoxib at doses ≤ 200 mg per day were the least likely to cause a cardiovascular event.7 NICE guidelines recommend that patients with pro-thrombotic risk, coronary artery or cerebrovascular disease should not be prescribed NSAIDs or a coxib. For other patients, treatment decisions should be made on an individual patient basis taking into account both cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risk factors. The medication should be prescribed for the shortest possible time and regularly reviewed.

Paracetamol (acetaminophen)

Acute overdose

Severe hepatocellular damage and renal tubular necrosis can result from taking 150 mg/kg body-weight (about 10 or 20 tablets) in one dose.9 Patients at particular risk include:

Clinical signs of hepatic damage (jaundice, abdominal pain, hepatic tenderness) and increased liver enzymes do not become apparent for 24–48 h after the overdose. Hepatic failure may ensue 2–7 days later; and is best monitored using prothrombin time.

The plasma concentration of paracetamol is of predictive value; if it lies above a semi-logarithmic graph joining points between 200 mg/L (1.32 mmol/L) at 4 h after ingestion to 50 mg/L (0.33 mmol/L) at 12 h, then serious hepatic damage is likely (plasma concentrations measured earlier than 4 h are unreliable because of incomplete absorption). Patients who are malnourished are regarded as being at risk at 50% of these plasma concentrations.

The general principles for limiting drug absorption apply if the patient is seen within 4 h. Activated charcoal by mouth is effective and should be considered if paracetamol in excess of 150 mg/kg body-weight or 12 g, whichever is the smaller, is thought to have been ingested within the previous hour. The decision to use activated charcoal must take into account its capacity to bind the oral antidote methionine.

Specific therapy involves replenishing stores of liver glutathione, which conjugates NAPQI and so diminishes the amount available to do harm. Glutathione itself cannot be used as it penetrates cells poorly, but N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and methionine are effective as they are precursors for the synthesis of glutathione. NAC is administered intravenously – an advantage if the patient is vomiting. The regimen is: 150 mg/kg in 200 mL 5% dextrose over 15 min; then 50 mg/kg in 500 mL 5% dextrose over 4 h; then 100 mg/kg in 1000 mL 5% dextrose over 16 h. While it is most effective if administered within 8 h of the overdose, evidence shows that continuing treatment for up to 72 h still provides benefit. Methionine alone may be used to initiate treatment when facilities for infusing NAC are not immediately available. The earlier such therapy is instituted the better, and it should be started if:

Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid)

In the 18th century, the Reverend Edmund Stone wrote about the value of an extract of bark from the willow tree (of the family Salix) for alleviating pain and fever. The active ingredient was salicin, which is metabolised to salicylic acid in vivo. Sodium salicylate manufactured from salicin proved highly successful in the treatment of rheumatic fever and gout, but it was a gastric irritant. In 1897, Felix Hoffman, a chemist at the Bayer Company, whose father developed abdominal pain with sodium salicylate, succeeded in producing acetylsalicylic acid in a form that was chemically stable. The new preparation proved acceptable to his father and paved the way for the production of aspirin.

Acute overdose

A moderate overdose (plasma salicylate 500–750 mg/L) will cause nausea, vomiting, epigastric discomfort, tinnitus, deafness, sweating, pyrexia, restlessness, tachypnoea and hypokalaemia. A large overdose (plasma salicylate concentration above 750 mg/L) may result in pulmonary oedema, convulsions and coma, with severe dehydration and ketosis. Bleeding is unusual, despite the antiplatelet effect of aspirin.

Adults who have taken a single large quantity usually develop a respiratory alkalosis. Metabolic acidosis suggests severe poisoning but a mixed picture is commonly seen. In children under 4 years, severe metabolic acidosis is more likely than respiratory alkalosis, especially if the drug has been ingested over many hours (e.g. mistaken for sweets).

Serial measurements of plasma salicylate are necessary to monitor the course of the overdose, for the concentration may rise in the early hours after ingestion. The general management of overdose applies, but the following are relevant for salicylate overdose:

Immunomodulatory drugs

Immunomodulatory drugs are used both to control symptoms and to retard or arrest the progression of chronic inflammatory diseases. They act to inhibit inflammation in a variety of ways, and reduce the proliferation and activation of lymphocytes.

The terminology surrounding immunomodulatory drugs has evolved separately in different specialties, although the underlying management principles are similar. Rheumatologists use the term ‘disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs’ (DMARDs) to describe those agents that reduce inflammatory disease activity and prevent radiologically determined disease progression in illnesses such as rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis. Treatment regimens for systemic vasculitis or severe organ involvement in the connective tissue diseases make use of terminology drawn from oncology, with ‘remission induction’ followed by ‘maintenance’ phases. Many of these drugs are described as ‘steroid-sparing’ as their concomitant use with glucocorticoids substantially reduces the total cumulative dose of steroid required for disease suppression. Many can be used in combination: with steroids, with each other or with biologic agents. This is discussed in the section on specific disease management at the end of the chapter.

The choice and combination of immunomodulatory agent in an individual patient depends on the following considerations:

Most conventional immunomodulatory agents act by inhibiting activation or reducing proliferation of lymphocytes. Many have more than one mechanism of action and often the precise way in which they exert their effects is unknown. Moreover, their antiproliferative and cytotoxic effects are in most cases not specific to the immune system but will affect any rapidly dividing cell population. This is one of the major causes of toxicity. Figure 16.4 presents an overview of these drugs and the known mechanisms of action that are relevant to the following discussion.

Methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil and leflunomide are antimetabolites, interfering with the de novo synthesis of purines and pyrimidines, on which proliferating (but not resting) lymphocytes depend. Methotrexate is thought to have additional anti-inflammatory effects. The calcineurin antagonists (ciclosporin and tacrolimus) and sirolimus selectively inhibit T-cell activation and proliferation, by inhibiting cytokine expression and cytokine-driven proliferation, respectively. Cyclophosphamide is an alkylating agent that is cytotoxic in dividing cells and, in an autoimmune response, is particularly toxic to rapidly proliferating lymphocytes. Intravenous immunoglobulin has immunomodulatory effects through interference with Fcγ receptor signalling, among other mechanisms. The precise mechanisms of action of sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, thalidomide, dapsone and gold are less clear, but they have been shown to influence the expression of a range of pro-inflammatory cytokines.

Immunomodulatory drugs have well recognised and occasionally very serious toxic side-effects but these only occur in a proportion of patients and/or are reversible on cessation of drug. They also often have less impact on quality of life than the inevitable effects of chronic high-dose glucocorticoid.

The complexity of prescribing and monitoring of toxicity with most immunomodulatory drugs demands collaboration between specialists, general practitioners and a well informed patient. All should only be initiated under specialist supervision and all call for close monitoring, for example of bone marrow, liver, kidney or other organs, as known toxicity dictates. Live vaccines in general should not be given to immunosuppressed patients as there is a risk of disseminated infection.

Methotrexate

Methotrexate was first developed as an anticancer drug 50 years ago. Studies in the 1980s demonstrated its efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis and it is now the principal DMARD used in this disease. It is also used to treat many other chronic inflammatory illnesses, particularly psoriatic arthritis, and in the maintenance phase of therapy for systemic vasculitis.

Azathioprine

Azathioprine is another antimetabolite which acts by inhibiting purine biosynthesis, thus preferentially acting on proliferating lymphocytes. Besides its use to prevent rejection in organ transplant recipients, it has a well established role as a disease-modifiying or steroid-sparing agent in the maintenance phase of treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases, such as SLE, ANCA-associated and large vessel vasculitis, and interstitial lung disease.

Sulfasalazine

Sulfasalazine (SSZ) is a conjugate of mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid, 5-ASA) coupled to sulfapyridine. It is used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, either alone or in combination with methotrexate, and peripheral joint involvement in the spondyloarthropathies, including ankylosing spondylitis and reactive arthritis.

Mechanism of action

SSZ is cleaved by bacterial azoreductases in the colon to release 5-ASA and sulfapyridine (Fig. 16.5). 5-ASA is retained mostly in the colon and excreted, but 30% of intact SSZ and all sulfapyridine are absorbed. Anti-inflammatory effects of mesalazine, both in the colonic epithelial cell and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, include inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase and lipo-oxygenase, scavenging of free radicals, and inhibition of the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and immunoglobulins. In the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, preparations containing 5-ASA alone have efficacy comparable to that of SSZ, but with fewer side-effects. In contrast, the sulfapyridine component appears to be the active moiety in rheumatoid arthritis. SSZ has been shown to reduce rheumatoid factor titres, inhibit IL-2-induced T-cell proliferation and inhibit macrophage IL-1 and IL-12 production, but the relative importance of these effects on its anti-inflammatory activity remains unclear.

Intravenous immunoglobulin

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IvIg) was first used in 1952 to treat primary immune deficiencies. It is composed of pooled IgG extracted from the plasma of 3000–10 000 blood donors, and contains the entire repertoire of naturally occurring antibodies. Besides its uses as a treatment for primary immune deficiencies and hypogammaglobulinaemia, it has immunomodulatory properties, making it an effective therapy for a number of autoimmune conditions. However, it has also been used in scenarios where there is no evidence of efficacy and little theoretical basis to suggest benefit. As there is a national shortage, the UK NHS has recently introduced guidelines to restrict its use only to those conditions in which there is a known benefit.14

Diseases in which IvIg is known to be of benefit include: Kawasaki disease, immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), dermatomyositis, Guillain–Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. There are many others in which it may be used as part of a range of treatments.

Biologic agents

The biggest change in treatment of inflammatory disease over the last 10 years has been the development of monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins that target a specific component of the inflammatory response. This allows selective modification of the abnormal immune response underlying many chronic inflammatory diseases, resulting in greater efficacy and potentially fewer side-effects than conventional ‘dirtier’ immunosuppressants. The first drugs of this sort to enter widespread clinical use were TNFα antagonists, which now have an established role in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriasis and Crohn’s disease.

In recent years there has been a dramatic increase in the variety of different biological drugs, and their indications. Their major drawbacks, shared by all, are an increased susceptibility to infection, and price, which in the UK at least severely curtails their use. A brief overview only is given here.

Anti-TNFα therapies

TNFα, a pro-inflammatory cytokine, is produced predominantly by macrophages and in smaller amounts by CD4 + Th1 lymphocytes. It plays an important role in macrophage activation and the eradication of intracellular bacterial and fungal infections. TNFα is also a key mediator of the inflammatory response seen in chronic granulomatous conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn’s disease. TNFα blockade by biological agents has proved highly effective for many chronic inflammatory diseases, and there are now several different agents selectively targeting TNFα available, with more in development.

Infliximab

is a chimeric monoclonal IgG1 antibody (Fig. 16.6). In rheumatoid arthritis it is administered by intravenous infusion at 3 mg/kg, repeated 2 and 6 weeks after the initial infusion and then at 8-week intervals. In ankylosing spondylitis, psoriasis and Crohn’s disease, it is used at doses of 5 mg/kg. Methotrexate is co-prescribed to limit the development of neutralising antibodies.

Adalimumab

is a fully human monoclonal IgG1 antibody (Fig. 16.6). The recommended dose is 40 mg by subcutaneous injection fortnightly, in combination with methotrexate. It is licensed for use in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis.

Adverse effects

The major risk with anti-TNF therapy is increased susceptibility to infection, particularly with intracellular pathogens such as Mycobacteria tuberculosis (M.Tb). In the case of M.Tb this may be reactivation of latent disease, but there is also a risk of new infection with M.Tb, other mycobacteria or intracellular pathogens such as histoplasmosis, coccidiomycosis or nocardiosis. Guidelines for assessing risk and for managing infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the context of anti-TNFα agents are available.15 Chemoprophylaxis must be started prior to treatment in patients with latent infection.

Antinuclear antibodies develop twice as commonly in rheumatoid arthritis patients taking anti-TNFα agents. The risk of developing anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies is also increased but, in the majority of cases, the clinical significance of these autoantibodies is unclear. Anti-TNFα-induced lupus is a rare complication.

Infusion reactions may occur with infliximab administration, e.g. fever, pruritus, urticaria, chest pain, hypotension and dyspnoea. These usually resolve if the infusion rate is slowed or suspended temporarily and then restarted at a slower rate.

Symptoms and/or radiological evidence of demyelination may be exacerbated, as may severe cardiac failure.

TNFα blockade presents a theoretical risk of increasing the incidence of malignancy. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, current data do not suggest an overall augmented tumour risk but the chance of developing lymphoma may be increased.

Other biologic anticytokine agents

Interleukin-1 (IL-1) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine with a central role in the activation of an inflammatory response. Anakinra is recombinant IL-1Ra, an endogenous antagonist of the IL-1 receptor. Clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis, SLE and psoriasis have had disappointing results, but anakinra is dramatically effective in treating rare hereditary fever syndromes characterised by excess IL-1 signalling. These include cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS) such as Muckle–Wells syndrome, and hyper-IgD syndrome. Anakinra is also effective in treating systemic onset juvenile inflammatory arthritis and adult-onset Still’s disease, and may be effective in severe gout.

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is another pro-inflammatory cytokine that is of critical importance to the mounting of an immune response, and is the most abundant cytokine found in the synovium of rheumatoid arthritis patients. Tocilizumab is a monocloncal antibody that binds IL-6 receptors and inhibits their intracellular signalling. It has been shown to be effective in controlling disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis,17 and is licensed for use in this condition in the UK. It is given by intravenous infusion on a monthly basis.

Other anticytokine biological agents in development or undergoing clinical trials include agents that block IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 (mainly to treat allergic asthma), and TGFβ signalling (to treat systemic sclerosis).

Management of diseases affecting the joints

Gout

Gout is a recurrent acute inflammatory arthritis caused by monosodium urate (MSU) crystals within synovial joints, affecting 1.4% of the UK population. Hyperuricaemia is due to over-production or under-excretion of uric acid. Both mechanisms may operate in the same patient, but reduced renal clearance is the main cause of hyperuricaemia in most cases. Drugs may influence these processes as follows:

Patients with gout but no visible tophi have a uric acid pool that is two to three times normal. This exceeds the amount that can be carried in solution in extracellular fluid, so MSU crystals precipitate and form deposits in tissues, including the joints and occasionally in subcutaneous tissues (tophi). These crystals then trigger acute attacks of inflammatory arthritis.

The priority in an acute attack is to relieve the intense pain by reducing the inflammatory response. NSAIDs are most commonly prescribed, but if contraindicated, colchicine (EULAR19 guidelines suggest 0.5 mg three times daily) is an alternative. A short course of oral prednisolone or intra-articular corticosteroid is also effective, although the severity of joint pain may preclude intra-articular injection during an acute attack.

Management of chronic gout should include a review of modifiable risk factors for hyperuricaemia, including obesity, hypertension, excessive alcohol consumption, high dietary intake of purines (red meat, game, seafood, legumes) and drugs (see above). If these measures are insufficient, plasma uric acid levels may be reduced by inhibiting the formation of uric acid (allopurinol, febuxostat), or increasing renal excretion (sulfinpyrazone, probenecid or benzbromarone). In treatment-resistant cases, ‘biologic’ therapy with recombinant uricase, which metabolises urate further, can be considered. Rapid lowering of plasma uric acid by any means can precipitate an acute flare, probably by causing the dissolution of crystal deposits. Colchicine prescribed concomitantly for up to 6 months or an NSAID for 6 weeks protect against this.

Rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic symmetrical polyarthritis affecting approximately 1% of the UK population. The principal pathology is inflammation within synovial joints, causing pain, swelling and stiffness and progressing to erosion and eventually joint destruction. RA is a systemic autoimmune inflammatory disorder and may cause extra-articular manifestations affecting blood vessels, bone marrow, GI tract, skin, lungs and eyes. Further sources of morbidity reflect the interaction of the disease process with adverse effects of medication and include osteoporosis, gastrointestinal haemorrhage and accelerated atherosclerosis. Mortality in patients with RA is increased up to three-fold compared with the general population; most of the excess is due to cardiovascular disease.

The initial management of a patient presenting with new inflammatory polyarthritis consists of reducing systemic inflammation, joint pain and stiffness while the diagnosis is confirmed.21 This may be achieved by short-term glucocorticoids such as Depo-Medrone 120 mg i.m., combined with analgesia and an NSAID (e.g. diclofenac 50 mg three times daily).

Once a diagnosis of RA is made, a DMARD should be initiated. As these reduce the progression of joint damage, it is imperative to start treatment in early disease; it is not acceptable to attempt to treat patients with early RA solely symptomatically. Methotrexate is the most common first-line DMARD. Careful education and counselling of the patient is important to ensure regular monitoring (of bone marrow, liver and lung function) and early detection of adverse effects. Folic acid 5 mg (up to 6 days weekly) is co-prescribed to reduce side-effects such as mouth ulcers.

Hydroxychloroquine is often used as an adjunct DMARD with methotrexate, and combination therapy of methotrexate, sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine can have added benefits beyond that of the individual drugs. Where methotrexate is contraindicated, ineffective or toxic, sulfasalazine alone, leflunomide or gold are alternatives. At any point in the disease course, glucorticoids can be used as an adjunct to control flares, administered orally, intra-articularly or intra-muscularly.

If adequate disease control is not achieved after use of two DMARDs, UK guidelines recommend starting anti-TNFα agents: infliximab, etanercept or adalimumab. If this is not effective, current practice involves switching to an alternative anti-TNFα agent with a different mechanism of action, or to the anti-CD20 mAb, rituximab. In 2010, tocilizumab (anti IL-6R) and abatacept (T-cell co-stimulation blockade) were approved for those patients who have not responded to other biologics. Many other biologic agents targeting cytokine expression, immune cell subtypes and intracellular signalling are currently in development.

It is particularly important to address cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with RA, given the increased risk of cardiovascular disease associated with chronic inflammation. Aggressive management of RA with DMARDs may reduce cardiovascular disease incidence at the same time as controlling inflammation. Moreover, atorvastatin has been reported to improve disease activity scores in RA.22

Protection against osteoporosis is particularly important for patients who receive long-term glucocortocoids; even doses less than prednisolone 7.5 mg daily increase fracture risk. The UK guideline23 for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is summarised in Figure 16.7. Bone loss is most rapid in the first few months of treatment, therefore protection must be considered at the onset of treatment, whenever the intention is to continue for more than 3 months, at any dose. Strategies include minimising the dose of corticosteroid, concomitant prescription of vitamin D 800 IU and calcium 1 g daily and advice on smoking cessation, alcohol intake, nutrition and exercise. Bisphosphonates should be prescribed for all patients aged over 65 years, or those with a history of a fragility fracture. Other patients should undergo bone densitometry and should be prescribed a bisphosphonate if the T score is − 1.5 or less24 at either lumbar spine or hip.

Patients with RA have a five-fold increased risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage compared with the general population, mainly due to NSAID use, alone or in combination with corticosteroids. Any patient with RA taking regular NSAIDs should also be prescribed a proton pump inhibitor or other gastroprotective agent.

Guide to further reading

Barnes P.J. Corticosteroids: the drugs to beat. Eur. J. Pharmacol.. 2006;533:2–14.

Baschant U., Tuckermann J. The role of the glucocorticoid receptor in inflammation and immunity. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.. 2010;120:69–75.

Cohen S., Fleischmann R. Kinase inhibitors: a new approach to rheumatoid arthritis treatment. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol.. 2010;22:330–335.

D’Cruz D., Khamashta M., Hughes G. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet. 2007;369:587–596.

Dasgupta B., Borg F.A., Hassan N., et al. BSR and BHPR guidelines for the management of giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology. 2010;49:1594–1597.

Dasgupta B., Borg F.A., Hassan N., et al. BSR and BHPR guidelines for the management of polymyalgia rheumatica. Rheumatology. 2010;49:186–190.

Elwood P.C., Gallagher A.M., Duthie G.G., et al. Aspirin, salicylates, and cancer. Lancet. 2009;373:1301–1309.

Fearon D., Innate immunity: Warrell. D.A., ed. Oxford Textbook of Medicine, fourth ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. (Chapter 5.5)

Gabay C., Lamacchia C., Palmer G. IL-1 pathways in inflammation and human diseases. Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 2010;6:232–241.

McMichael A., Principles of immunology: Warrell. D.A., Cox T.M., Firth. J.D., Benz E.J. Oxford Textbook of Medicine, fourth ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. (Chapter. 5.1)

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Osteoarthritis: the care and management of osteoarthritis in adults. NICE Guidance CG59. Available online at: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG59 (accessed November 2011)

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Rheumatoid arthritis: the management of rheumatoid arthritis in adults. NICE Guidance CG79. Available online at: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG79 (accessed November 2011)

Østensen M., Forger F. Management of RA medications in pregnant patients. Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 2009;5:382–390.

Østensen M., Motta M. Therapy insight: the use of anti-rheumatic drugs during nursing. Nat. Clin. Pract. Rheumatol.. 2007;3:490–496.

Šenolt L., Vencovský J., Pavelka K., et al. Prospective new biological therapies for rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmun. Rev.. 2009;9:102–107.

Terkeltaub R. Update on gout: new therapeutic strategies and options. Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 2010;6:30–38.

Zhang W., Doherty M., Bardin T., et al. EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part II: management. Ann. Rheum. Dis.. 2006;65:1312–1324.

1 Bombardier C, Laine L, Reicin A et al 2000 Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. VIGOR study group. New England Journal of Medicine 343:1520–1528.

2 Continuously produced, rather than depending on the presence of an inducer.

3 Silverstein F E, Faich G, Goldstein J L et al 2000 Gastrointestinal toxicity with celecoxib vs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: the CLASS study: a randomized controlled trial. Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study. Journal of the American Medical Association 284:1247–1255.

4 Farkouh M E, Kirshner H, Harrington R A et al 2004 Comparison of lumiracoxib with naproxen and ibuprofen in the Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial (TARGET), cardiovascular outcomes: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 364:675–684.

5 Bresalier R S, Sandler R S, Quan H et al 2005 Cardiovascular events associated with rofecoxib in a colorectal adenoma chemoprevention trial. New England Journal of Medicine 352:1092–1102.

6 Cannon C P, Curtis S P, FitzGerald G A et al 2006 Cardiovascular outcomes with etoricoxib and diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis in the Multinational Etoricoxib and Diclofenac Arthritis Long-term (MEDAL) programme: a randomised comparison. Lancet 368:1771–1781.

7 Fosbøl E L, Folke F, Jacobsen S et al 2010 Cause-specific cardiovascular risk associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs among healthy individuals. Circulation, Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 3:395–405.

8 Aronoff D M, Oates J A, Boutaud O et al 2006 New insights into the mechanism of action of acetaminophen: its clinical pharmacological characteristics reflect inhibition of the two prostaglandin H2 synthases. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 79:9–19.

9 A 73-year-old woman was taking paracetamol for pain relief but added a paracetamol-containing proprietary preparation for cold relief, in effect nearly doubling the dose. She died of paracetamol poisoning. Her husband said that his wife ‘knew that too much paracetamol was dangerous but she did not realise there was paracetamol in [the proprietary preparation]’ which she bought at a supermarket that did not have a dispensary counter where she could have received advice. Report 2011 British Medical Journal 342:971.

10 Chan E S, Cronstein B N 2010 Methotrexate – how does it really work? Nature Reviews Rheumatology 6:175–178.

11 Anonymous 2000 Leflunomide for rheumatoid arthritis. Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin 38:52–54.

12 Fielder A, Graham E, Jones S et al 1998 Royal College of Ophthalmologists guidelines: ocular toxicity and hydroxychloroquine. Eye 12:907–909.

13 Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Amoura Z, du Huong L T et al 2005 Safety of hydroxychloroquine in pregnant patients with connective tissue diseases. Review of the literature. Autoimmunity Reviews 4:111–115.

14 www.ivig.nhs.uk (accessed November 2011)

15 British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee 2005 BTS recommendations for assessing risk and for managing Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and disease in patients due to start anti-TNF-α treatment. Thorax 60:800–805.

16 BMJ Group 2008 Rituximab and abatacept for rheumatoid arthritis. Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin 46:57–61.

17 [No authors listed] 2010 Tocilizumab for rheumatoid arthritis. Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin 48(1):9–12.

18 Pincus T, Koch G G, Sokka T et al 2001 A randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial of diclofenac plus misoprostol versus acetaminophen in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Arthritis and Rheumatism 44:1587–1598.

19 European League Against Rheumatism.

20 Sundy J S, Baraf H S, Becker M A et al 2008 Efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) pegloticase (PGL) in subjects with treatment failure gout (TFG): phase 3 results from GOUT1 and GOUT2 [Abstract]. Arthritis and Rheumatism 58(Suppl.):S400.

21 Kennedy T, McCabe C, Struthers G et al 2005 BSR guidelines on standards of care for persons with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 44:553–556.

22 McCarey D W, McInnes I B, Madhok R et al 2004 Trial of atorvastatin in rheumatoid arthritis (TARA): double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 363:2015–2021.

23 Bone and Tooth Society, National Osteoporosis Society and Royal College of Physicians. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis – guidelines for prevention and treatment. 2002. Available online at:http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/pubs/books/glucocorticoid/

24 The T score is the number of standard deviations above or below the mean bone mineral density of a 25-year-old (sex-matched) individual. A T score below − 2.5 indicates osteoporosis.

25 Kyle S, Chandler D, Griffiths C E M et al 2005 Guideline for anti-TNF-alpha therapy in psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 44:390–397.

26 Keat A, Barkham N, Bhalla A et al 2005 BSR guidelines for prescribing TNF-α blockers in adults with ankylosing spondylitis. Report of a working party of the British Society for Rheumatology. Rheumatology (Oxford) 44:939–947.

Share this: