CHAPTER 51 Dorsal Radiocarpal Ligament Tears
Various authors have cast light on the importance of the dorsal radiocarpal ligament (DRCL) in maintaining carpal stability.1–4 Tears of the DRCL have been linked to the development of volar and dorsal intercalated segmental instabilities and may be implicated in the development of midcarpal instability.5–7 Despite this growing body of evidence, there is still a paucity of literature on the incidence of DRCL tears. An isolated tear of the DRCL also can be a source of chronic wrist pain.8 The existence of a DRCL tear when combined with a tear of a primary wrist stabilizer indicates a chronic lesion, which may negatively affect the prognosis after treatment.9,10
In most series, the DRCL is overlooked during the typical arthroscopic examination of the wrist. It is hard to visualize a DRCL tear through the standard dorsal wrist arthroscopy portals because the torn edge of the DRCL tends to float up against the arthroscope while viewing through the 3,4 and 4,5 portals, which makes identification and repair of the DRCL tear cumbersome. It can be seen obliquely through the 1,2 and 6U portals, but visualization of the DRCL across the radiocarpal joint may be laborious in a tight or small wrist, especially if synovitis is present. Wrist arthroscopy through a volar radial portal (VR) is the ideal way to assess the DRCL because of the straight line of sight.11–13
Clinical Relevance
Elsaidi and colleagues14 showed the importance of the DRCL on scaphoid kinematics through a series of sectioning studies. They sequentially divided the radioscaphocapitate, long radiolunate, radioscapholunate, and short radiolunate ligaments. They next divided the central and proximal scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL), then the dorsal SLIL, and finally the dorsal capsule insertion on the scaphoid. There was no appreciable change in the radiographic appearance of this wrist. When the DRCL was divided, a dorsal intercalated segmental instability deformity occurred.
In another series of biomechanical studies on ligament sectioning using 24 cadaver arms, Short and coworkers15 determined that the SLIL is the primary stabilizer of the scapholunate articulation, and that the DRCL, the dorsal intercarpal ligament, the scaphotrapezial ligament, and the radioscaphocapitate ligament are secondary stabilizers. They found that dividing the dorsal intercarpal or scaphotrapezial ligament alone followed by 1000 cycles of wrist flexion-extension and radial-ulnar deviation had no effect on scaphoid and lunate kinematics. Dividing the DRCL alone did cause increased lunate radial deviation when the wrist was in maximum flexion. Dividing the SLIL after any of the ligaments tested produced increased scaphoid flexion and ulnar deviation while the lunate extended. Short and coworkers15 also hypothesized that cyclic motion seems to cause further deterioration in carpal kinematics owing to plastic deformation in the remaining structures that stabilize the scapholunate.
These data provide a rationale for repairing the DRCL. The data also suggest that consideration should be given to augmenting the stability of the scaphotrapezial ligaments concomitant with treatment of the SLIL instability. Similar studies have established that the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) and the dorsal and volar radioulnar ligaments are primary stabilizers of the ulnocarpal joint.16 DRCL tears that are found during the arthroscopic treatment of ulnar-sided lesions are handled in a similar fashion.
Indications
Geissler and colleagues17 proposed an arthroscopic grading scale of interosseous ligament instability that has gained wide acceptance. In Geissler grade 1 and 2 lesions, there is no to minimal instability owing to ligament attenuation, but no tearing; these are synonymous with a dynamic instability. Grade 3 and 4 lesions represent partial and complete tears with greater degrees of carpal instability. This classification quantifies the resultant instability, and not the actual size of the tear. Based on this grading scale, an arthroscopic classification of DRCL tears is proposed in Table 51-1.
Stage 1 | Isolated DRCL tear |
Stage 2 | DRCL tear with associated SLIL or LTIL instability (Geissler grade 1/2) and/or TFCC tear |
Stage 3A | DRCL tear with associated SLIL or LTIL tear (Geissler grade 3) and/or TFCC tear |
Stage 3B | DRCL tear with associated SLIL or LTIL tear (Geissler grade 4) and/or TFCC tear |
Stage 4 | Chondromalacia with widespread carpal pathology |
DRCL, dorsal radiocarpal ligament; LTIL, lunotriquetral interosseous ligament; SLIL, scapholunate interosseous ligament; TFCC, triangular fibrocartilage complex.
* The ligament with the highest Geissler grade determines the stage.
The treatment of DRCL tears is summarized in Table 51-2. An arthroscopic repair is indicated for isolated DRCL tears, which often leads to resolution of the wrist pain.8,10 DRCL tears are commonly associated with SLIL tears or instability or both. Geissler grade 1 and 2 SLIL injuries are still amenable to arthroscopic treatment. In these situations, an arthroscopic repair of any associated DRCL tears is indicated because it may augment the coronal stability of the SLIL repair.8–10 In open SLIL repairs, sagittal plane stability is often supplemented by adding a dorsal capsulodesis or using a tendon weave, such as the modified Brunelli procedure. Arthroscopic thermal shrinkage of the scaphotrapezial ligaments also theoretically may enhance the sagittal plane stability of the scapholunate joint. This is currently under investigation, but no data are available to recommend this procedure as yet.
Stage 1 | Arthroscopic DRCL repair |
Stage 2 | Arthroscopic DRCL repair, SLIL or LTIL débridement ± shrinkage, TFCC repair/débridement ± wafer |
Stage 3A | Arthroscopic DRCL repair, SLIL or LTIL shrinkage + pinning, TFCC repair/débridement ± wafer (consider scaphotrapezial ligament shrinkage) |
Stage 3B | Open SLIL repair/reconstruction ± capsulodesis, LTIL repair/reconstruction, TFCC repair/débridement ± wafer/ulnar shortening |
Stage 4 | Partial carpal fusion versus PRC |