CHAPTER 30 Dorsal Capsuloplasty in Volar Subluxation of the Distal Radius
Instability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) may be responsible for reduced hand and wrist function from loss of strength and chronic pain on the ulnar side of the wrist. As Bowers noted in 1991, this condition was believed to be rare but became more and more diagnosed and therefore the subject of much discussion and investigation.1 At this time, Bowers’ observation is still of current interest.
The ulna is the stable unit of the forearm, supporting the radius and the hand and allowing controlled movement of the radius along its axis and the DRUJ. The bony anatomy of the DRUJ, however, adds very little to stability. A variety of other structures are responsible for stability of the DRUJ. It is currently assumed that these comprise the pronator quadratus, ulnocarpal ligament, extensor carpi ulnaris subsheath, dorsal radioulnar ligament, volar radioulnar ligament, interosseous membrane, the bony anatomy (sigmoid notch), and the DRUJ capsule.2–10
The soft tissues, together with normal articular cartilage surfaces of the lower end of the ulna and the medial articular facet of the distal radius, ensure a smooth and complete forearm in pronation/supination.1,11 This specific movement is provided not only by rotation from the radius about the ulna but can also only be executed when there is a variable degree of dorsopalmar translation.12,13
Garcia-Elias described in his article on soft tissue anatomy and relationships about the distal ulna that the radius in supination rotates and translates dorsally about the stable ulna, whereas in pronation it rotates and translates palmarly.14 As a result, there is a great variance in joint surface contact of the DRUJ between the sigmoid notch of the distal radius and the articulating surface of the ulnar head. In the neutral forearm position the surface contact is maximal (about 60%). In all other forearm positions there is joint surface contact until it is lost almost completely (less than 10%).15
A stable DRUJ allows rotation, axial motion, as well as translational movement in the dorsopalmar plane. All these movements are based on the osseous contours around the joint, supported by a complex of surrounding soft tissues, which Bowers1 calls the major retaining ligaments. The triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) is considered the major retaining ligament of the DRUJ, with two ligament subsets, the dorsal and volar marginal ligaments (DML-TFC, VML-TFC). These thickenings on the dorsal and volar margins of the central part of the TFCC on the triangular fibrocartilage proper are also referred to as the dorsal and volar radioulnar ligaments.16 There is experimental evidence6,17,18 suggesting that both palmar and dorsal distal radioulnar ligaments need to be intact to maintain complete stability of the joint throughout the whole range of forearm rotation. The relative contribution of each ligament in stabilizing the DRUJ during pronation/supination remains, however, contradictory.6,7,13,17,19
Most of the current treatment options regarding instability of the DRUJ refer to reconstruction of the TFCC. A great variety of techniques have been published. Adams and Berger have classified these techniques into three categories20: (1) a direct radioulnar tether that is extrinsic to the joint,21 (2) an indirect radioulnar link through an ulnocarpal sling or tenodesis,22 and (3) reconstruction of the distal radioulnar ligaments.16,23
In their article, Adams and Berger describe their own technique for reconstruction of both dorsal and palmar radioulnar ligaments, because they believe that gross instability of the DRUJ requires disruption of both ligaments. Reconstruction of both ligaments would therefore be the optimal surgical treatment for post-traumatic, chronic DRUJ instability. For this purpose they use a tendon graft (usually the palmaris longus), which is passed through drill holes in the distal radius and ulna.20
The Authors’ Experience
Patient Selection
The course of 20 consecutive patient treatments during the period from 2003 until 2005 was analyzed retrospectively. Charts were reviewed for preoperative history and physical findings. Fifteen of the patients were female,14 and 5 were men. Of this group, 4 patients were excluded. One patient could not be traced for follow-up, 1 patient developed a pain syndrome (although on the radial side of the wrist), and 2 patients were excluded because of the severity of their TFCC degeneration, which became apparent during operation. Nevertheless we attempted a reefing of the DML, which later proved insufficient. In these 2 patients an ulnar shortening was performed in a second operation.