DNA Repair

Published on 15/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Dermatology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1427 times

Chapter 34 DNA Repair

SOURCES OF DNA DAMAGE

DNA damage comes from two sources: the intrinsic metabolism of the cell and environmental insult.

• Environmental insult

By far the most serious damage to skin DNA is from the sun. Solar ultraviolet radiation (UV) also causes the formation of ROS which result in 8oGua. In mitochondria, repeated doses of UVA result in the accumulation of a characteristic deletion mutation in mitochondrial DNA. The frequency of this characteristic mutation in human skin increases with sun exposure, suggesting that it is an internal dosimeter for cumulative sun exposure. But 10-times more frequent than 8oGua is the cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD), which is DNA damage caused by direct absorption of UV photons without any ROS intermediate. UV causes two adjacent DNA bases to fuse together in a cyclobutane ring, in a photochemical reaction that takes about 15 picoseconds; antioxidants cannot stop it because no free radicals are involved. A second type of base fusion, called a 6–4 photoproduct, is similarly formed about one-sixth as frequently as CPD. Because these fused bases distort the DNA much more than 8oGua, they are much more mutagenic than 8oGua, and consequently much more carcinogenic. CPD causes a characteristic type of DNA mutation, and these signature mutations are frequently found in key cancer genes in squamous and basal cell carcinomas. This is the smoking gun that connects CPDs to skin cancer.

Alkylation is a third type of DNA damage in which an alkyl group is added to DNA. The most prevalent additions are at the 7 position of guanine (N7meGua) and to the phosphates of the DNA backbone, but a much less common form of damage—alkylation of the 6 position of guanine (O6meGua)—is the most mutagenic and hence the most dangerous. This type of damage is usually caused by toxins, such as from some of the chemicals in cigarette smoke, and by drugs. The premature signs of aging in the skin induced by cigarette smoking may be associated with the alkylation damage from alkylating agents in cigarette smoke transported through the circulation to the skin. Additionally, exposure to other chemicals via exposure to industrial pollution and drugs with DNA alkylating potential may have some role in what has been considered normal skin aging.

MEASURING DNA REPAIR

DNA repair is a multistep process and no one assay measures all aspects of it. More importantly, erroneous conclusions are sometimes drawn from using the wrong assay to measure repair.

• Antibody-based assays

Several antibodies raised against specific types of DNA damage (e.g. anti-CPD, anti-8oGua or anti-O6meGua) have been developed to directly measure the appearance and removal of DNA lesions. Cultured cells may be stained with these antibodies, and counterstained for the DNA of the nucleus, and then examined under the microscope for the amount of antibody binding as a measure of the extent of DNA damage. Figure 34.2A shows UV-irradiated cells stained for the nucleus (blue); Figure 34.2B shows the same cells also stained for CPD (red). In other assays the DNA is purified from the cells, or from skin, and bound to a filter membrane, which is then probed with the damage-specific antibodies. A reduction in the amount of antibody binding after treating the cells, artificial or natural skin with a cosmeceutical ingredient (always compared to an untreated control) is a direct measure of DNA repair.

DNA DAMAGE AND PHOTOAGING

For many years the focus of DNA repair research was on the causes of UV-induced immune suppression and skin cancer. Recently, however, DNA damage and repair has become a central theme in studies of photoaging. The molecular pathways that lead to immune suppression are quite similar to those that contribute to photoaging. UV-induced DNA damage to cells causes them to both activate new genes and release stress signals, including interleukin (IL)-1, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and IL-10, that also activate new genes. These released cytokines act on the cell itself (autocrine activation) and on distant cells (paracrine activation). In the case of photoaging, among the genes that are activated are those for matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) that degrades collagen. For example, UV irradiation of keratinocytes not only upregulates their MMP-1 gene expression, but also leads to release of soluble factors that act on unirradiated fibroblasts to cause them to release MMP-1. The net effect is the digestion of collagen, which is one of the hallmarks of photoaged skin. These responses are reminiscent of wound healing responses, and the working hypothesis, first proposed by Fisher, Voorhees and colleagues, is that chronic UV exposure produces repetitive small but incomplete wound healing responses that result in micro-scars, which eventually accumulate to form the pathology of photoaging. Much more work needs to be done to understand all the components activated in this solar wound healing, but it points toward interventions that can prevent and repair DNA damage and thereby ameliorate photoaging by, for example, restoring the balance of collagen production and MMP-1 degradation.

FURTHER READING

Brash D. Sunlight and the onset of skin cancer. Trends in Genetics. 1997;13:410–414.

Brennan M, Bhatti H, Nerusu KC, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-1 is the major collagenolytic enzyme responsible for collagen damage in UV-irradiated human skin. Photochemistry and Photobiology. 2003;78:43–48.

Fisher G, Datta S, Talwar H, et al. Molecular basis of sun-induced premature ageing and retinoid antagonism. Nature. 1996;379:335–339.

Obayashi K, Kurihara K, Okano Y, et al. L-ergothioneine scavenges superoxide and singlet oxygen and suppresses TNF-α and MMP-1 expression in UV-irradiated human dermal fibroblasts. Journal of Cosmetic Science. 2005;56:17–27.

Sancar A, Lindsey-Boltz L, Unsal-Kacmaz K, et al. Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 2004;73:39–85.

Stege H, Roza L, Vink A, et al. Enzyme plus light therapy to repair DNA damage in ultraviolet-B-irradiated human skin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2000;97:1790–1795.

van Zeeland A, Mullenders L, Vrieling H. Gene and sequence specificity of DNA damage induction and repair: consequences for mutagenesis. Mutation Research. 2001;485:15–21.

Wolf P, Maier H, Müllegger R, et al. Topical treatment with liposomes containing T4 endonuclease V protects human skin in vivo from ultraviolet-induced upregulation of interleukin-10 and tumor necrosis factor-α. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2000;114:149–156.

Yarosh D, Tsimis J, Green L, et al. Enhanced unscheduled DNA synthesis in UV-irradiated human skin explants treated with T4N5 liposomes. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 1991;97:147–150.

Yarosh D, Klein J, O’Connor A, et al. Effect of topically applied T4 endonuclease V in liposomes on skin cancer in xeroderma pigmentosum: a randomized study. Lancet. 2001;357:926–929.