Disorders of the inert structures: Capsular and non-capsular patterns

Published on 10/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Orthopaedics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 11499 times

52

Disorders of the inert structures

Capsular and non-capsular patterns

image

Capsular pattern

The normal capsular pattern at the knee joint is gross limitation of flexion and slight limitation of extension; the ratio of flexion : extension is roughly 1 : 10 (Fig. 52.1). Thus 5° of limited extension corresponds to 45–60° limitation of flexion and 10° to 90–100°. The range of rotation becomes restricted only in advanced arthritis. Recently, the concept of a capsular pattern of motion restriction at the knee was supported by a study of patients with inflamed knees.1

A number of conditions of the knee show a limited range in a capsular way but all can be differentiated by findings from the history and clinical examination. Therefore, the important features of capsular disorders are a traumatic or non-traumatic, slow or sudden onset, synovial thickening, redness, nocturnal pain and so on.

Traumatic arthritis

Trauma to the capsule invariably leads to traumatic arthritis. Depending on the site and stage of the lesion, the capsular pattern may be gross (acute sprain of the medial collateral ligament) or more subtle (coronary sprain).

The diagnosis is relatively simple: after an injury, a capsular pattern appears, with effusion but no capsular thickening. Care must be taken not to overlook a traumatic haemarthrosis; when the question of blood in the knee joint does arise, diagnostic aspiration must be carried out at once. If blood is present in the aspirate, not only does it indicate a serious lesion but also the joint must be fully aspirated. On the other hand, if the aspirated fluid is clear, there is no point in emptying the joint because it is not the fluid that matters but the primary lesion. Hence treatment of traumatic arthritis showing a clear effusion only during aspiration involves dealing with the underlying primary disorder.

Rheumatoid and reactive arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis is a common cause of knee inflammation. The symmetrical distribution of the affected joints is typical of this disease (Fig. 52.2).

Reactive arthritis is an inflammation of the joint secondary to a generalized infection but in which the articular fluid remains aseptic (Crohn’s disease, Reiter’s syndrome, aseptic gonococcal arthritis).2,3 The arthritis can remain monoarticular but may involve other joints in an asymmetrical manner.

In rheumatoid and reactive arthritis, intra-articular injections with triamcinolone give excellent but often only temporary results. Steroids injected into weight-bearing joints can cause arthropathy if injected too often.4,5 Therefore, injections must be restricted to two or three a year, which is enough to keep the patient comfortable. Nevertheless, considerable doubts about the dangers of repeated intra-articular steroid injections have arisen since a study report by Balch et al.6 They studied 65 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, who each received a minimum of 15 and a maximum of 167 injections at monthly intervals. Only two showed gross osteoarthrosis. These findings were confirmed later.7

Osteoarthrosis

The prime cause of gross degeneration in the knee joint is a disturbed distribution of load, which happens, for instance, when the patient suffers repeatedly from attacks of internal derangement because of a torn meniscus.8,9 Early osteoarthrosis will also occur if a valgus deformity is present from youth or there is an old malunited fracture that produces uneven load and repeated shearing strains. This also occurs if the meniscus is completely removed and its load-bearing function is therefore lost; the femoral condyles then exert pressure on the tibial platform over a much smaller area and the joint is apt to wear out rapidly.10,11 The knee is often affected in osteitis deformans and marked osteoarthrosis can then supervene. Aseptic necrosis of the medial condyle has been blamed as the cause of rapidly progressive, symptomatic osteoarthrosis in the elderly.1214

The loss of articular cartilage, the structural changes of subchondral bone and the reactive osteophyte formation are the typical and well-known radiological appearances of progressive degenerative arthritis at the knee.15 It may be localized at the lateral, medial or patellofemoral compartment or may be generalized throughout the joint (Fig. 52.3).

Although osteoarthrosis at the knee is considered very common, its prevalence is overestimated. The reason is quite simple: radiographs taken in a middle-aged or elderly patients complaining of knee pain will always show some evidence of cartilaginous degeneration. As age advances, some narrowing of the joint space and osteophyte formation always appear; they are normal and cause no harm.16 Therefore the diagnosis of symptomatic osteoarthrosis should be made not by radiography but on the typical findings on clinical examination. A minor degree of osteoarthrosis does not give rise to symptoms and it is only when gross osteoarthrosis with disintegration of the cartilage supervenes that the complaints can be attributed to it. What commonly, but incorrectly, is labelled ‘osteoarthrosis’ is a monoarticular steroid-sensitive arthritis or an impacted loose body. Both occur in middle-aged or elderly patients with osteophytes showing radiologically, and the diagnosis is missed if full clinical examination is not carried out properly.

The symptom of osteoarthrosis is pain during weight bearing, which disappears at rest. In gross arthrosis with complete erosion of cartilage, nocturnal pain from an increase of venous pressure in the tibial bone may sometimes supervene.

The characteristic clinical features in uncomplicated osteoarthrosis of the knee joint are a cold joint, devoid of synovial thickening, with limitation of movement in the capsular pattern.

The end-feel is bony and hard. In severe osteoarthrosis, the marked limitation of movement in a capsular pattern is accompanied by loud creaking of bone against bone.

However, the typical capsular proportion of limitation may be absent if the osteoarthrosis, although severe, remains localized. This is often the case in localized arthrosis of the patellofemoral compartment: passive flexion may be markedly limited and painful but passive extension remains normal. In this case, the flexion–extension movement is accompanied by rough crepitus.

The treatment of osteoarthrosis is mainly with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and intra-articular injections with steroids. NSAIDs provide some relief of the symptoms but have clinically important side effects – they are estimated to cause 3300 deaths annually among the elderly in the US.17 Intra-articular injections with steroids also improve symptoms but the benefits are usually short-lived18,19 and there is always the potential for long-term joint deteriorations if injections are repeated too often. During the last decade, a number of promising reports on the effect of intra-articular injections with hyaluronic acid have been published. Hyaluronic acid is an important component of healthy synovial fluid and cartilage tissue; it is thought to protect the articular cartilage and soft tissue surfaces of the knee by acting as a lubricant and, because of its high viscosity, by imparting viscoelastic properties to the joint. Because intra-articular hyaluronic acid concentrations are lower in the synovial fluid of arthrotic knees,20 intra-articular injections with hyaluronic acid have been proposed as a means of restoring the viscoelastic properties of the knee joint, thereby providing symptom relief and improving joint function. Efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid have been compared with that of saline,2123 corticosteroids24 and NSAIDs. All the double-blind and randomized studies on the effect of hyaluronic acid on osteoarthrosis of the knee confirm that five intra-articular injections of sodium hyaluronate at weekly intervals are superior to placebo and are well tolerated in patients with osteoarthrosis of the knee, conferring a symptomatic benefit which persisted for 6 months.2527 As hyaluronic acid seems to provide beneficial effects with minimal adverse reactions in a significant number of patients, it may be considered as a substantive addition to the therapeutic armamentarium in osteoarthrosis.

When the condition is too advanced, joint replacement is the only solution.

Monoarticular steroid-sensitive arthritis

Cyriax described a monoarticular arthritis in the knee having some similarities with monoarticular arthritis in the shoulder and elbow. The cause and pathogenesis of this arthritis remain unclear but it heals immediately and lastingly after two injections of triamcinolone, thus earning it the title of ‘steroid-sensitive’ arthritis (Cyriax28: p. 404).

The patient describes a gradual onset of unprovoked swelling in one or both knees. At first, the swelling is completely painless. After some weeks or months, the knee starts to hurt all over. The pain is not provoked by movement and is often nocturnal.

In the initial stage, clinical examination shows only some diffuse warmth, fluid and synovial thickening. These marked symptoms and signs contrast strongly with the functional examination, which is almost completely normal. Only in advanced cases does a clear capsular pattern supervene.

Differential diagnosis

The differential diagnosis of a monoarticular steroid-sensitive arthritis, summarized in Table 52.1, must be made from the following conditions29:

• Polyarthritis: in monoarticular steroid-sensitive arthritis, disease does not spread to other joints and the laboratory findings remain normal, distinguishing it from rheumatoid and reactive arthritis.30,31

• Villonodular arthritis of Jaffé and Lichtenstein32 is an advanced arthritis, with marked synovial hyperplasia and thickening of the capsule.33 This type of arthritis is frequently complicated by spontaneous and recurrent haemarthrosis.34,35 In doubtful cases, arthroscopic biopsy is indicated.36 Treatment with steroid injections usually fails. Synovectomy is then advised.37 Good results have also been reported with intra-articular injections of thiotepa.38

• In middle age, a loose body complicating osteoarthrosis may be very difficult to distinguish. The distinct features of a loose body are sudden twinges, localized warmth and absence of synovial thickening. In long-standing arthritis, secondary wasting of the quadriceps muscle may make the knee feel weak and climbing stairs difficult; consequently, a complaint of twinges is not always a good sign. The only certain criterion may then be synovial thickening, which is not always ascertained easily, especially in middle-aged women, whose subcutaneous tissues are already somewhat thickened. In such circumstances, manipulation for a suspected loose body can be tried; if several attempts do not succeed, the joint should be injected.

• Gout and pseudogout have an acute onset with an immediate and gross articular pattern.

Treatment

The treatment of monoarticular steroid-sensitive arthritis at the knee is two injections of 40 mg of triamcinolone at an interval of 2 weeks (Fig. 52.4).

Technique: injection for monoarticular steroid-sensitive arthritisimage

The patient lies on the couch and relaxes the quadriceps muscle (Fig. 52.4a). If gross arthritis is present, it may be necessary to place a small cushion under the knee in order to keep it in slight flexion. The operator stands level with the other knee. With one hand the patella is pushed up and towards the operator, which makes the medial edge more prominent. A 5 mL syringe is filled with steroid suspension and fitted with a thin needle, 4 cm long, which is placed near the upper border of the patella and thrust in horizontally just between the patellar edge and the medial femoral condyle (Fig. 52.4b). It lies intra-articularly at about 2 cm depth.39

Crystal synovitis

Gout

An acute arthritis at the knee occurs in 25% of all attacks of gout.40 There is considerable pain, swelling and redness, which makes the condition difficult to differentiate from septic arthritis, haemarthrosis or pseudogout. Sometimes analysis of the joint fluid is necessary to distinguish these conditions.

Pseudogout

Calcium pyrophosphate crystals are believed to induce the synovitis of pseudogout. The term chondrocalcinosis refers to the presence of these calcium-containing salts in the articular cartilage,41 which are seen on radiographs.

The disease may be familial and is also commonly associated with a wide variety of metabolic disorders – for example, haemochromatosis, hyperparathyroidism, ochronosis and diabetes mellitus – and is also found in patients undergoing dialysis.42,43

As a rule, patients are over 60 years of age. Ninety percent of attacks of pseudogout are localized to the knees and there is an acute and recurrent arthritis which, untreated, lasts 1–4 weeks. Plain radiography may show calcification of the articular cartilage or menisci. Diagnosis is by aspiration, which demonstrates calcium pyrophosphate crystals in the fluid.

Pseudogout is best treated with an immediate intra-articular injection of triamcinolone. Alternatively, some of the oral anti-inflammatory agents can be prescribed.

Haemarthrosis

Haemophilia

About half of all haemophiliac articular effusions occur at the knee joint. The patient is typically an adolescent who states that suddenly, and without apparent reason, the knee became swollen and very painful. Clinical examination shows a hot, swollen knee, with a severe capsular pattern (90° limitation of flexion and up to 70° limitation of extension). Even if the patient is seen some weeks after the onset, limitation of movement remains unaltered. When the tendency to bleeding is only minor, the patient is probably not known to be a haemophiliac, but the acute onset in the absence of a causative injury, the hot, swollen joint and the extreme capsular pattern should arouse suspicion. Aspiration will reveal a haemarthrosis but the diagnosis must be confirmed by haematological investigations.

Villonodular synovitis

Haemarthrosis can occur in villonodular synovitis.52,53 Localized pigmented villonodular synovitis is a rare lesion that may affect any joint but is most often found in the knee. Treatment usually involves arthroscopic resection of the lesion.54

Septic arthritis

Bacterial infection of the knee is an extremely serious disorder. If it is not properly treated, it will not only lead to total destruction of the joint but can also be life-threatening.

Septic arthritis can follow haematogenous dissemination from focal infections, such as urethritis, cystitis, skin infections55 or dental abscesses. This is particularly so when resistance is decreased: diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, renal failure or a deficient immune system are all possible causes of decreased resistance.56 Intravenous drugs and gonococcal infections, particularly with antibiotic-resistant gonococci,57 have also been blamed for the increased incidence of septic arthritis of the knee. Another cause of septic arthritis is direct inoculation of organisms during intra-articular injection.

The symptoms of septic arthritis are hyperacute pain, swelling, redness and a gross articular pattern. The local symptoms are accompanied by high fever, chills and nausea.

Treatment is with high doses of antibiotics intravenously and daily aspiration of the knee.58

Non-capsular pattern

Internal derangement

Introduction

Impaction of loose tissue within the joint cavity, causing mechanical interference with the normal movement between femur and tibia, is usually referred to as ‘internal derangement of the knee’. The loose tissue consists of meniscal parts, cartilaginous tissue peeled off from meniscus, joint cartilage or bony fragments, as is the case in osteochondritis dissecans.

Symptoms and signs in internal derangement are quite typical. The pain is localized, of the mechanical type and has a sudden onset. ‘Locking of the joint’ and ‘twinges’ are typical sensations. The former describes sudden and painful limitation of one movement; the latter is abrupt, unforeseen and sharp pain that appears during weight bearing.

The clinical signs are a non-capsular pattern and a typical bouncing or springy end-feel. The latter is typically found during passive extension.

A thorough clinical assessment can usually provide sufficient information to make a definitive diagnosis of internal derangement.59 Plain radiographs are of no use in the diagnosis of internal derangement. Arthroscopy may be useful but should never be performed without first completing a full preoperative examination.

Lesions of the meniscus

These can be grouped into congenital anomalies, traumatic conditions, cysts and metabolic disorders.

Congenital anomalies

The most common congenital anomaly with pathological sequelae is a discoid lateral meniscus. The incidence in autopsy specimens is between 0% and 7%,60 but most do not cause problems.61 Symptomatic disorder seems to occur only in the Wrisberg ligament type of discoid meniscus. This type is classically described as lacking a posterior capsular attachment and presents in childhood with a ‘snapping’ knee: the meniscus rolls up in front of the lateral compartment during flexion, as a consequence of increased friction and greater mobility; during extension, the rolled meniscus becomes trapped anteriorly, until it reduces suddenly with a dramatic audible snap (Fig. 52.5).62

The disorder affects children and adolescents. The presenting symptom is internal derangement at the lateral side of the knee. Clinical examination reveals an audible click and visible alteration of the knee at approximately 10–20° of extension.63 Diagnosis is confirmed with sonography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).64

Treatment of a congenital discoid meniscus is complete or partial meniscectomy.65

Traumatic meniscal lesions

Disruption of collagen fibres within the meniscus occurs as the result of either an acute injury or gradual age-dependent degeneration (Fig. 52.6). The split may be either horizontal or vertical.

Vertical tears

Vertical tears are the most important clinicopathological condition of the meniscus and usually result from excessive force applied to a normal meniscus. Transverse tears are less common than longitudinal ones. The latter frequently involve the thin inner edge of the meniscus, which, when it separates, creates the bucket-handle tear, so characteristic of the locking knee.66 Peripheral longitudinal tears are defined as those occurring within 3 mm of the meniscosynovial junction and comprise about 30% of all vertical tears.67 Left untreated, most of these peripheral lesions heal spontaneously.68

The less mobile medial meniscus is much more commonly involved than the lateral meniscus. The medial meniscus is closely bound to the medial collateral ligament and the medial coronary ligament, which attaches the meniscus to the tibia, is only 4–5 mm long. The lateral meniscus, however, is separated from the lateral collateral ligament by the popliteus tendon, and its coronary ligament is much longer (13–20 mm).8 This difference in mobility is the reason for the higher proportion of torn medial menisci.

The typical vertically torn meniscus, which results in a bucket-handle lesion, occurs between the ages of 15 and 30 years. The mechanism of injury is as follows: during flexion–extension, the menisci move with the tibia, to which they are attached (see online chapter Applied anatomy of the knee), but during rotational movements they follow the femoral condyles. During combined movements, the normal displacement of both menisci may be prevented and the menisci become trapped between tibia and femur. This typically happens in a football player who, in an attempt to kick the ball sideways, severely twists on the slightly flexed and weight-bearing knee: the rotation force of the femur on the immobilized tibia then ruptures the cartilage. It has also been suggested that meniscal lesions may appear as the result of knee instability, in particular after anterior cruciate lesions.69,70

The typical history of a bucket-handle lesion is that of a patient, usually a male soccer player aged between 16 and 30 years, who felt agonizing and localized pain, usually at the inner side of the knee, during a vigorous rotation with weight bearing. The knee gave way and the patient fell to the ground. When he stood up again, the knee could not be straightened; although it could be bent, it was impossible to force it into extension. Full extension was only regained when either the patient, the trainer or the doctor forced the knee to unlock by a combined rotational and extension movement. After an audible click, full extension immediately became possible again. After reduction, the knee became swollen and sore for a couple of days. After a week or two, the patient may then find the knee is ‘cured’, providing it is not twisted while weight bearing. Should that happen, something painfully ‘going out’ in the joint would be felt and, as before, straightening the joint would not be possible. Again, the limitation of movement disappears only if the knee is manipulated.

The biomechanical basis for the locking is that, in a normal knee, the collateral ligaments and the posterior aspect of the joint capsule all become taut during extension. When the slack in the ligaments has been taken up, the tibia and femur are strongly approximated and extension beyond 180° is prevented. At full extension, there is no room for a displaced piece of cartilage between the two bones and therefore the movement must be somewhat limited by its presence. Sudden locking of the knee in partial flexion, with immediate unlocking on manipulation, is therefore pathognomonic of a bucket-handle tear.

Horizontal and posterior cracks

It is generally accepted that these lesions result from normal forces acting on a degenerating meniscus.71 Degenerative horizontal cleavage lesions are therefore more common in individuals of more than 40 years of age and usually occupy the posterior half of the menisci.72,73 They are so common that most authors regard them as part of the usual degenerative processes in the knee (Noble and Turner,74 Fahmy et al,75 Smillie9: pp. 79, 97, 108, 145, 153).

In a posterior crack, the history is less dramatic than in that of a vertical tear.72 For instance, the patient finds that, if there is a twist on the knee, something is occasionally felt to ‘give way’, usually at the back of the joint. It is immediately difficult to straighten the leg, but when it is shaken or kicked out, a click is heard and the limb returns to normal function. Sometimes the patient gives a different history: slight rotation and flexion during weight bearing – for example, on getting out of a car – produce an uncomfortable click which is relieved immediately on straightening the leg.

Diagnosis

Ruptures with displacement

In a longitudinal vertical tear, the history is most informative: the patient states that on twisting the leg during weight bearing a click is heard, localized unilateral pain is felt and the knee immediately locked in flexion. All unassisted attempts to straighten the knee fail.

The patient enters the room with a characteristic gait: hopping on one leg with the knee on the affected side flexed and the foot plantiflexed with the toes just touching the ground.

Clinical examination reveals a warm and slightly swollen joint. Flexion is normal or somewhat limited by the traumatic arthritis but when extension is attempted, limitation of 5–10°, with a characteristic springy block, is detectable. Rotation away from but not towards the affected side is painful.

Palpation usually reveals a very tender joint line at the affected side, because of a coincident sprain of the coronary ligament.

When a middle-aged patient presents with a posterior displacement, extension may be just possible but very painful, and once again the end-feel of a springy block is informative. In this type of lesion, tenderness is not found on palpation.

In a horizontal lesion, a visible and palpable ‘tag’ can form, which then projects at the joint line. Often digital pressure will suffice for reduction but this is seldom permanent.

Ruptures without displacementimage

If the patient is seen some time after reduction of the meniscus, the knee may appear normal or merely shows a sprained coronary ligament. Alternatively, the patient presents with a history of a minor posterior crack but the routine functional examination is normal. In these cases, the following tests can be used to elicit signs of a ruptured meniscus (Fig. 52.7).

Arthroscopy

During recent decades, arthroscopy has made the diagnosis and treatment of a torn meniscus much easier.76,77 Nevertheless, arthroscopy does not make a clinical diagnosis redundant and routine arthroscopy without a previous thorough functional examination can lead to wrong conclusions and treatment. Because meniscal lesions are so common that they are a frequent finding in middle-aged people, it is very possible that a meniscal tear, found incidentally during ‘routine’ arthroscopy, is not the cause of the patient’s complaints. For instance, if a patient with a chronic ligamentous lesion of the medial collateral band or the coronary ligaments is subjected to arthroscopy before a clinical diagnosis has been made, the damaged meniscus will be blamed and thus unnecessarily removed.

The use of the arthroscope has encouraged the widespread assumption that the source of chronic pain in the area of the knee is to be found in the interior of the joint itself. The more likely cause of pain, however, is in the surrounding ligaments, but this can only be demonstrated by a thorough clinical assessment.78 We, like Goodfellow (‘He who hesitates is saved’),79 believe that, although meniscal tears can be detected by arthroscopy with almost 100% accuracy, caution is needed in ascribing symptoms at the knee to meniscal lesions. Diagnosis of meniscal lesions should be made clinically and arthroscopy should be reserved for confirmation of clinical findings as an aid in therapeutic decision making.

Treatment

Manipulative reduction

Manipulation should be tried at once in a patient who presents with a displaced meniscus. The manipulation is not completely painless and anaesthesia may sometimes be required, especially if the patient is tense or anxious. Although some authors advise general anaesthesia, sufficient pain relief can be obtained after an intra-articular injection of 5 mL of lidocaine 2%.

Technique: preparative phase.

The hip is slightly rotated medially and strong valgus pressure is exerted at the knee (Fig. 52.8). In this position, repeated extensions are performed but not beyond the end of range – i.e. if the extension range is limited by 10°, the movement should stop at about 15°. In order to ensure this, the thumb placed in the popliteal fossa is used as a brake during the procedure. Once flexion and extension movements have been performed several times in this way, rapid to-and-fro rotations of the knee are added.

Natural history

The meniscal lesion itself causes no pain because the body of the meniscus is almost completely insensitive. Pain is the result of ligamentous strain caused by the repeated luxations and subluxations. However, damaged menisci frequently do not provoke any symptoms. In a postmortem study in patients above and below the age of 50, Noble and Hambden found that up to 60% of the former and 19% of the latter had meniscal tears.80,81

It is important to realize that most complaints following subluxation of a meniscus stem from a sprained coronary ligament. If a patient with a history of a former locked meniscus complains of persistent and localized pain but proves to have a full range of movement with a normal end-feel, a sprained coronary ligament should be suspected and appropriate treatment given. After successful manipulation, the reduced piece of cartilage may never subluxate again and the patient is cured for good. This was emphasized by Casscells,82 who stated that not all meniscal tears need surgical treatment. Asymptomatic meniscal tears identified at the time of arthroscopic examination for ligamentous lesions are best left in place or unrepaired, as they will remain asymptomatic.83 Furthermore, laboratory studies have demonstrated that torn menisci may have normal biomechanical function if the peripheral circumferential fibres remain intact.84,85

Surgery

Although surgery of the meniscus should not be undertaken lightly, it is unwise to permit repeated attacks of internal derangement because they initiate a premature, troublesome and intractable osteoarthrosis.75,86

The choice lies, then, between total or partial meniscectomy or repair. Total meniscectomy leads to loss of integrity of the articular cartilage and impairment of joint stability.8791 It is no longer considered the treatment of choice because of increasing dissatisfaction with the long-term results.10,92 Instead, and if this is technically possible, only the loose fragment is removed and the outer part of the meniscus, together with the coronary ligament, is left alone.93 The result is no increase in weight-bearing stress on the tibia.94 The outer rim of the meniscus can still bear weight and thus preserve the articular cartilage, as well as play a useful role in stabilizing the joint. In experienced hands, this partial removal of the meniscus using arthroscopy is much less damaging to the joint and requires only 2 days’ bed rest. Subsequent return to work and sport is also quicker.95 Several long-term studies have demonstrated the technique’s superiority over total meniscectomy.96100

In recent years, suturing of the relatively vascular outer edge of the meniscus has been shown to result in healing by fibrous tissue.101107 Meniscal repair is nowadays considered as the treatment of choice in single, vertical, longitudinal tears in the outer third of the meniscal substance.108 Good to very good long-term results may be expected if the longitudinal tear is less than 3 cm long and within 3 mm of the periphery, and the meniscal tissue is not degenerating.109,110 Ligamentous instability is a relative contraindication to repair. In combination with insufficiency of the anterior cruciate ligament, the rate of retearing approaches 40% and therefore anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction should be performed at the same surgical intervention.111,112

Cysts of the meniscus

When cysts form, they are almost always at the lateral meniscus; a cyst of the medial meniscus is extremely rare.113 There is evidently a connection between cyst formation and the existence of ruptured menisci because half the cystic menisci are also torn.114

The history can be indicative of internal derangement or the patient may complain of localized pain when standing for some time.

Clinical examination reveals a normal range of movement and a normal end-feel. Ligamentous tests are negative. When the joint line is palpated during full extension, the cyst is felt there as a small firm mass that varies in apparent size depending on the position of the knee, usually being most prominent in 20–30° of flexion and disappearing on full flexion (Pisani’s ‘disappearing’ sign).115 Some tenderness is elicited at the joint line and over the cyst. The diagnosis can be confirmed with MRI.116

Treatment is aspiration of the cyst. It is important to use a large-bore needle and to insert it in several different directions, as the cyst is often multilocular.117 Arthroscopic treatment is used if the cyst recurs.118120

Loose body in young patients

Loose bodies, which are often multiple, can form in the knee in teenagers and young adults. They are usually the result of osteochondritis dissecans but sometimes originate from chondromalacia patellae or a small osteochondral chip fracture.

Osteochondritis dissecans is well known, although the true cause is still not completely understood. In those under the age of 13 years, the condition seems to result from an abnormality of ossification. In teenagers and adults, however, trauma may have a significant part to play in the development of the lesion.122,123 More than 75% of the osteochondral lesions are on the lateral side of the medial femoral condyle.124 About 10–15% are situated at the lateral femoral condyle and in less than 10% of the patients the lesions are bilateral.125

Few symptoms result, as long as the osteochondral lesion remains stable and embedded in the condyle (Fig. 52.9). There is some vague pain during weight bearing which can also be elicited during pressure over the medial condyle. Symptoms of intermittent pain and locking of the joint occur only when the fragment has become loose, which typically happens between 16 and 20 years of age.

The history is of a sudden and temporary locking in extension. The patient finds that, from time to time while walking along, the knee suddenly locks. If this happens while doing sports, a fall to the ground is usual because the knee is locked straight when the patient expects to be able to bend it. When flexion is attempted again, this is successful and walking on it is immediately possible. Some aching and traumatic arthritis result for the next few days. Recurrence of this sequence is common and the location of the pain may vary, indicating that the loose body has shifted to another part of the joint.

After the attack of internal derangement, there are signs of a traumatic arthritis only: the knee is warm, contains some fluid and shows a slight capsular pattern. The ligamentous tests are normal and there is no local tenderness. Sometimes the loose body can be felt in the suprapatellar pouch. Wilson126 describes a test that aids in the diagnosis. The knee is flexed to a right angle and the tibia rotated internally; the examiner then slowly extends the patient’s knee. At about 30° of extension, pain may occur, presumably arising from the lesion at the inner condyle pressing against the tibial spine.

Loose bodies have an osseous nucleus and therefore can be seen on a radiograph. In true osteochondritis dissecans, the gap at the lateral side of the medial femoral condyle is also seen on an anteroposterior and a tunnel view.

Stable osteochondritis dissecans has a successful healing rate of 50% after 6 months of relative rest.127 However, because the chance of spontaneous healing is low for juvenile osteochondritis dissecans lesions that present with disruption of the articular cartilage surface, and the risk of further damage is high, most surgeons recommend surgical stabilization of all unstable juvenile osteochondritis dissecans lesions at the time of presentation.128 The method used depends on the size of the defect and the congruity of the fragment with its bed. Sometimes replacement is tried, and sometimes removal of the loose fragments by arthroscope.129

The differential diagnosis and treatment of loose body and meniscal tear in a young patient are summarized in Table 52.2.

Loose body complicating osteoarthrosis

Cyriax28 (his p. 403) pointed out that:

Contrary to popular belief, minor or moderate osteoarthritis at the knee does not cause symptoms.130 However, if there is some crepitating osteoarthritis, the articular cartilage is roughened. A small piece may then exfoliate. Alternatively, a small piece of degenerated meniscal cartilage may peel off and escape into the joint space. Such a loose fragment can occupy a harmless position at the back of the joint, or in the suprapatellar pouch, but sometimes impacts between the articular surfaces, where it occupies space, induces overstretching of the ligaments and causes localized pain.

History

The history of a loose body is typical. The patient is middle-aged or elderly and states that, for no reason, swelling and localized pain appeared in one knee, usually at the medial side. Pain may be present on waking or suddenly each step hurts when walking. Sometimes pain is felt at the lateral side, or right in the joint, but never all over the joint. Curiously, the pain can sometimes spread up to the distal part of the thigh or down to the proximal part of the leg. If the pain moves from one side of the joint to the other, the diagnosis is obvious because moving pain suggests a moving (and free-lying) lesion.

The patient is hesitant to go downstairs for fear of a sudden twinge which makes the knee give way. Therefore descent is usually one step at a time, firmly holding on to the banister. Less often, the twinges and the feeling of instability are experienced during ordinary walking. Twinges indicate a momentary impaction in the knee joint and in middle-aged people they are almost pathognomonic of the existence of a loose body.

Sometimes pain also occurs at night; this is likely to happen when it is at the medial side of the knee. One possible explanation could be local tenderness at the medial collateral ligament when the knees are held together while the patient lies on the side.

Clinical examination

The signs vary with the position of the loose fragment within the joint but there are some that are always present and draw attention to the condition:

• Localized warmth: There is localized warmth on the painful side of the joint. If the joint is not warm at the beginning of the clinical examination, the examiner proceeds with the functional tests and repeats the palpation at the end. Local heat is then found which has been provoked by the minor stresses imposed on the joint during examination.

• Fluid: often, some fluid is present.

• Non-capsular pattern: there is usually a non-capsular pattern. It is obvious that when extension is limited by, e.g. 5° and flexion is not, or flexion is 30° limited but extension is of full range, a block due to internal derangement should be suspected. Such an obvious non-capsular pattern is rather uncommon and, as a rule, the signs are quite subtle. Extension is full but painful and has a smoother end-feel than on the opposite side, while flexion is full and painless. Alternatively, full extension is free from pain but flexion is slightly limited, with localized pain and a soft end-feel. In other words, the stop is not hard, as if muscle spasm due to arthritis was present, but feels as if it would go further, the limiting factor being pain.

• A varus movement hurts at the inner side of the joint: this indicates that a space-occupying lesion is present in the medial compartment. Alternatively, lateral or medial shearing strain may hurt at the inner or the outer side of the joint. Care should be taken not to press on the tender medial collateral ligament during these tests.

• Localized pain and positive ligamentous tests: there is localized pain at the end of range and some ligamentous tests are positive. As a rule, valgus strain and external rotation hurt at the medial side. The medial collateral ligament is also very tender to the touch. Usually these findings, together with localized warmth, fluid and absence of synovial thickening, are characteristic of a sprained ligament. However, the patient does not mention trauma. The conclusion is that, if the ligament is not being strained by external forces, the cause of the sprain must lie within the joint: the ligament becomes sprained when a small cartilaginous loose body is displaced between femoral condyle and tibial plateau, where it will put stress on the ligaments on every attempt to extend the joint. Cyriax called this ‘a sprain without a sprain’.

If, after the clinical examination, the conclusion is that there is an impacted loose body, an attempt should be made to move the piece of cartilage to a site where it no longer interferes with joint mobility. Confirmation that the diagnosis is correct comes from the immediate disappearance of symptoms and signs after manipulation.

Special investigations

The knees of elderly patients always show radiological evidence of osteoarthrosis. Loose bodies, however, usually being composed entirely of cartilage, are not visible on radiography. When the radiograph shows osteoarthritis, the current tendency to depend on diagnosis by such means rather than by good clinical assessment can result in the clinical features being ignored and the patient being erroneously regarded as suffering from osteoarthrosis of the knee. The acute onset and the warmth are then mistakenly labelled as ‘acute episodes’ of progressing osteoarthrosis.

It is also apparently very difficult to see small loose bodies during diagnostic arthroscopy. It is striking, however, to hear that surgeons often see an improvement of symptoms and signs in an ‘arthrotic’ knee after such a procedure.131133 In all likelihood, the loose bodies are washed out inadvertently during the drainage that is necessary for arthroscopic investigation and it is a consequence of this that the patient notices an improvement.

Differential diagnosis (Table 52.3)

Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee occurs in elderly patients, usually at the medial femoral condyle.12 The condition causes continuous pain which gets worse at night, but twinges are not mentioned. Clinical and radiological examinations are negative during the first few weeks of the condition’s development,134136 and early diagnosis must be made by a bone scan137,138 or by the use of MRI. The treatment is proximal osteotomy or prosthetic replacement.139

The most common error, however, is to regard the patient with a loose body as suffering from osteoarthrosis or a monoarticular steroid-sensitive arthritis. Because all these lesions occur in middle age or in the elderly and the signs are sometimes subtle, the distinction is not always apparent. In case of doubt, it is always wise to manipulate the knee and see whether there is any improvement.

Treatment

As soon as impaction of a loose body in a knee is diagnosed, manipulation must be performed. The intention behind the manipulation is to move the loose body from its position between the tibial and femoral articular surfaces into a position in the joint where it is no longer pinched, i.e. under the posterior recess. To make room between the tibia and femur, the whole procedure is performed during strong traction.

First manipulationimage

The principles of performing a manipulation for a loose body are:

Technique: starting position

The patient lies prone on a low couch, the knee flexed to a right angle. An assistant holds the thigh just above the popliteal fossa. The manipulator stands level with the patient’s knee. The ipsilateral hand grasps the calcaneus. The other hand is placed at the dorsum of the foot in such a way that the second metacarpal bone presses against the neck of the talus (Fig. 52.10a). The pressure against the talus and the simultaneous traction on the calcaneus hold the foot in dorsiflexion during the whole procedure (Fig. 52.10b).

The manipulator places the contralateral foot on the couch, just in front of the patient’s knee. The patient’s thigh is lifted off the couch and the foot is hooked on the manipulator’s knee. The assistant now presses the thigh downwards as hard as feasible. This ensures maximal traction on the relaxed ligaments and creates some distraction of the joint surfaces. This position is maintained for a few seconds until the manipulator feels the quadriceps muscle relax, and the tibia is distracted from the femur.

Technique: manipulation

The manipulator now removes the leg from the couch and, leaning sideways towards the end of the couch, places the foot as distally (in relation to the patient) as possible (Fig. 52.10c). By doing so, maximum traction is ensured during the whole procedure. Extension is accompanied by a series of full lateral or medial rotations (Fig 52.10d). To this end, both shoulders and elbows must be used in order to reach the very end of rotation. The end-feel will once again be a guide in deciding whether the knee is at full range. In practice, rotation is tried first in one direction and then, if this does not succeed, in the other. The assistant who is holding the leg down feels a click, indicating that reduction has taken place, but the manipulator does not feel anything. After each manipulation, whether the knee has clicked or not, the joint is examined again. If there is improvement after a particular manœuvre, the same manipulation is done again.

Second manipulationimage

If the previous manœuvre has only partially improved flexion but has not completely reduced the loose body, techniques that use leverage can be employed next. If the wrist is placed at the back of the patient’s knee, forced flexion of the tibia on the femur will strongly distract the joint surfaces and thus make room for the loose fragment to move.

Technique

The patient lies supine on the couch. The manipulator places one wrist in the popliteal fossa, between tibia and femur, while the other hand presses at the distal end of the tibia. The knee is then bent as far as it will go (Fig. 52.11a). When progressive ligamentous resistance indicates that the slack has been taken up, the tibia is quickly forced into greater flexion with a small thrust. A click may be felt. Re-examination will show whether further reduction has taken place.

If this manipulation fails, the same movement can be repeated during rotationimage. The manipulator places a firm rolled bandage in the popliteal fossa (Fig. 52.11b). This permits the patient’s foot and wrist to be held with both hands. Rotational movements can be added during the forced flexion. First one rotation is tried; should this fail, rotation in the opposite direction is attempted.

It is important to verify the range of extension after each attempt, because full and painless extension at the knee is more important than some improvement of flexion. Should the range of flexion improve but extension become painful or limited, this manipulation should be terminated immediately.

Third manipulationimage

This technique is used when the first manipulation does not achieve full and painless extension. In most cases, extension is not limited but is painful and has an altered end-feel.

Technique

The patient lies supine. The manipulator stands level with the knee, and bends it to a right angle while the hip is flexed and laterally rotated. The hand is applied at the inner side of the knee and the other hand at the lateral border of the distal tibia in such a way that a strong varus movement is achieved (Fig. 52.12).

The patient’s cooperation is now sought because the knee must be actively and slowly extended while the manipulator maintains the varus pressure. At almost full extension, and maintaining as much varus pressure as possible, the manipulator adds a quick jerk towards full extension. If this final jerk proves to be too painful, it should only be done a few times, after repeated active extension by the patient.

Once again, re-examination should follow each attempt and the end-feel will indicate whether reduction has taken place (Fig. 52.13).

Plica synovialis syndrome

Plicae synoviales are remnants of the embryological dividing walls in the knee. Arthroscopy has recently brought their existence to prominence. They are present in more than 20% of all knees,140 but it is only when pathological changes take place that pain and disability are likely to occur. Injuries and excessive strains are thought to be responsible for these pathological alterations.141,142

Although there are several types of synovial plicae, it is the plica mediopatellaris, or medial shelf (Fig. 52.15), which seems to cause most problems.143

image

Fig 52.15 Medial plica (1).

This plica was first described by Iino in 1939.144 It has its origin on the medial wall of the knee joint and runs obliquely down towards the synovium, inserting into it and covering the medial infrapatellar fat pad. During flexion it glides over the medial condyle like a wiper over a windscreen, which in normal circumstances is harmless and painless; if the plica is pathologically altered or the medial condyle has undergone arthrotic changes, however, symptoms may result.

One of these symptoms is a sudden twinge when the inflamed plica is pinched between the patella and the medial condyle of the femur. Sometimes there is pain and a slightly modified end-feel at the end of extension. A painful arc during flexion–extension can occur when a damaged and thickened plica rides over a chondral defect at the medial condyle, and it can be aggravated when this movement is performed during lateral rotation.145,146

The clinical diagnosis of a symptomatic medial plica is made from a history of localized pain during flexion–extension or pain at the end of extension.147 The plica can sometimes be felt if the examiner rolls the medial capsule of a slightly (45°) flexed knee under the thumb.148 When this rolling is painful, 20 mg of triamcinolone is locally infiltrated.149,150 Some authors have reported good to fair results with flexibility training of the flexor and extensor muscles of the knee.150,151 If the symptoms persist, arthroscopic resection is performed.152

Because the presence of a medial shelf is normal,153 one should be cautious in ascribing symptoms to it. The diagnosis should be made clinically and not by relying on accidental findings during arthroscopy.

Intra-articular adhesions

There is an unusual disorder of the knee, characterized by an increasing limitation of flexion while extension remains full and painless. As this pattern occurs after operation or an unexceptional sprain, Cyriax ascribed it to intra-articular adhesions.

The history is as follows. There has been surgery to the medial side of the knee or an atypical sprain (hyperextension or hyperflexion) that has given rise to the lesion. In spite of vigorous physiotherapy, the knee stiffens progressively and almost painlessly, the main symptom being inability to flex the joint. During the initial weeks, 15–30° of flexion are lost; after a month there is loss of about 90° of flexion. While the range of flexion decreases day by day, extension remains full and painless. Finally, the knee may stiffen with a flexion range of 45°, extension still being full-range.

Clinical examination immediately reveals the gross non-capsular pattern. Furthermore, the joint is cold but not swollen; nor is there any capsular thickening. The combination of the non-capsular pattern, gross limitation of flexion and absence of local signs is so striking that this remarkable condition will be recognized easily, especially if there is a history of trauma or surgery.

The only lesion that can be confused with these intra-articular adhesions is Stieda–Pellegrini disease, in which the calcified medial collateral ligament can cause a similar selective limitation of flexion. A radiograph establishes the diagnosis.

Treatment

Gentle forcing does not prevent the progressive decrease of flexion and any conservative treatment, except forceful manipulation towards flexion, is futile. It is easiest to force the knee when the patient adopts a prone position.

Subsynovial haematoma

A severe blow on the front of the thigh may cause a localized haematoma between the suprapatellar pouch and the front of the femur (Fig. 52.16). Flexion is limited but extension remains free.

The history is typical: a severe knock just above the patella has caused immediate pain and localized swelling.

During clinical examination, the knee is found to be warm and swollen. Extension is full but probably painful at the end of its range. Passive flexion is grossly limited and there is localized pain just above the patella. Resisted extension is painless, which indicates that neither the quadriceps tendon nor the patella is to blame. Palpation reveals some fluid in the joint and a solid, tender swelling at the suprapatellar pouch.

Fluid aspirated from the joint is clear or slightly blood-stained. There is no improvement in range after aspiration, which establishes that the effusion is a secondary one. If the needle is passed just above the patella, in the direction of the femur, blood from the haematoma can be obtained and confirms the diagnosis. It is important to note that aspiration is possible only during the initial few days because the haematoma organizes rapidly.

After aspiration, the knee should be mobilized during the following days in order to prevent persistent adhesions.

Cysts and bursitis

It is important to note that localized swellings may limit movements in a non-capsular way (Fig. 52.17). For example, a bursa underlying the medial collateral ligament, a prepatellar bursa or a cyst under the iliotibial tract can each cause a specific pattern.

Medial collateral ligament bursitis

The patient is usually middle-aged and complains of localized pain at the medial side of the knee, which has appeared without a specific cause (Fig. 52.18). The pain is worse during activity and eases at rest, but nocturnal pain may occur. There is no symptomatic evidence of internal derangement, such as twinges, locking and fear of giving way.154 Spontaneous cure is uncommon155: one of our patients had had unchanged symptoms for more than 6 years.

Clinical examination reveals a cold joint, with no fluid or synovial thickening. Extension is normal, while flexion is limited by 15–45°. The end-feel is soft, the limiting factor being pain, which is strictly confined to the inner side of the knee. Valgus strain and lateral rotation are painful. Palpation reveals a solid swelling under the medial collateral ligament, level with the joint, which can be so hard that it is mistaken for a large osteophyte. Unlike a cyst of the meniscus, the bulge does not disappear during flexion, but enlarges and becomes firmer, especially when it lies at the dorsal aspect of the ligament.156

It is important to differentiate between chronic ligamentous sprain and bursitis under the medial collateral ligament, the signs of which are very similar. In sprain, the distinctive factors are a history of previous trauma and absence of palpable swelling. The treatment required – deep friction and manipulation – would undoubtedly worsen bursitis, and therefore the differential diagnosis should be made carefully. In case of doubt, MRI can demonstrate the fluid collection under the medial collateral band very well.157

Treatment is aspiration. A thick needle (19G × 4 cm) should be used because the fluid is so viscous that it is very difficult to remove. Injecting 10–20 mg of triamcinolone into the cavity will prevent early recurrence of symptoms. After aspiration, immediate full and painless flexion is possible. Permanent cure is often achieved.158

Patellar bursitis

Prepatellar bursitis is by far the most common type of bursitis, especially in patients who have to kneel repeatedly in their work (e.g. gardeners, bricklayers). The infrapatellar bursa can also become inflamed (‘clergyman’s knee’).

The patient complains of pain and swelling in front of the knee. The diagnosis is made on simple inspection. If the swelling is gross, it can result in limitation of flexion because of the painful stretching of bursa and skin. Palpation shows that the effusion lies between skin and patella. The presence of heat suggests haemorrhage into the bursa, whereas heat and redness indicate the possibility of sepsis.159

Aspiration should be performed to disclose the nature of the fluid. If the bursa refills repeatedly, surgical removal must be considered.160

Bursa between the iliotibial tract and the lateral epicondyle

A bursa can form under the iliotibial tract where it rides over the lateral condyle. This is a common condition in long-distance runners, cyclists and skiers. The patient complains of localized pain while walking or running. Clinical examination reveals a painful arc at 30° of flexion. Resisted flexion and extension of the knee are negative. A swelling can be palpated between the condyle and the iliotibial tract.

Bursitis at this site must be differentiated from a strained iliotibial band, which also occurs in athletes and gives rise to localized pain at the outer side of the knee. In this condition, pain is the result of a lesion of the tract itself, confirmed by discomfort on resisted extension and lateral rotation (see p. 1143).

Aspiration, followed by local infiltration with corticosteroid suspension, is the remedy. If the condition fails to respond to this treatment, the posterior 2 cm of the band should be transversely sectioned.161

References

1. Fritz, JM, Delitto, A, Erhard, RE, Roman, M, An examination of the selective tissue tension scheme; with evidence for the concept of a capsular pattern of the knee. Phys Ther 1998; 78:1046–1056. image

2. Haslock, I, Wright, V. The arthritis associated with intestinal disease. Bull Rheum Dis. 1973; 32:479.

3. Mielants, H, Veys, EM, Reiter’s syndrome and reactive arthritis. New Engl J Med 1984; 310:1538. image

4. Chandler, GN, Jones, DT, Wright, V, Charcot’s arthropathy following intra-articular hydrocortisone. BMJ 1959; 1:952–953. image

5. Ishikawa, K. A study of deleterious effects of intra-articular corticosteroid on knee joints – a clinical investigation on primary gon-arthrosis. J Jap Orthop Ass. 1978; 52(3):359–374.

6. Balch, HW, Gibson, JMC, El-Ghobarey, E, et al. Steroid injections into knee. Rheumatol Rehab. 1977; 16:137.

7. Gray, RG, Gottlieb, NL, Intra-articular corticosteroids: an updated assessment. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1983; 177:235–263. image

8. Seedhom, BB, Loadbearing function of the menisci. Physiotherapy. 1976;62(7):223–226. image

9. Smillie, IS. Injuries of the Knee Joint. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1978.

10. Jackson, JP, Degenerative changes in the knee after meniscectomy. BMJ 1968; 2:525–527. image

11. Seedhom, BB. Can footballers play well without their cartilages? Medisport. 1980; 2:98.

12. Albäck, S, Bauer, G, Bohne, WH, Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 1968; 9:705–733. image

13. Aglieti, P, Insall, JN, Bussi, R, Deschamps, C, Idiopathic osteonecrosis of the knee. Aetiology, prognosis and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg. 1983;65B(5):588–597. image

14. Rozing, PM, De Jonge-Bok, JM, Idiopathische osteonecrose van de mediale femurcondyl: een zeldzame oorzaak van pijn in de knie bij een oudere patient. Ned Tidschr Geneeskd. 1983;127(19):809–811. image

15. Gunther, KP, Scharf, HP, Standardization of roentgen diagnosis in coxarthrosis and gonarthrosis in clinical studies. Recommendations of the 1st Working Circle of the DGOT. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1997;135(3):193–196. image

16. Kornaat, PR, Bloem, JL, Ceulemans, RY, et al, Osteoarthritis of the knee: association between clinical features and MR imaging findings. Radiology. 2006;239(3):811–817. image

17. Griffin, MR, Epidemiology of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated gastrointestinal injury. Am J Med. 1998;104(Suppl. 3):23S–29S. image

18. Jones, A, Doherty, M, Intra-articular corticosteroids are effective in osteoarthritis but there are no clinical predictors of response. Ann Rheum Dis 1996; 55:829–832. image

19. Habib, GS, Saliba, W, Nashashibi, M, Local effects of intra-articular corticosteroids. Clin Rheumatol. 2010;29(4):347–356. image

20. Balazs, E, Denlinger, JL, Viscosupplementation: a new concept in the treatment of osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 1993;39(Suppl.):10–15. image

21. Wobig, M, Dickhut, A, Maier, R, Vetter, G, Viscosupplementation with hylan G-F 20: a 26-week controlled trial of efficacy and safety in the osteoarthritic knee. Clin Ther. 1998;20(3):410–423. image

22. Lohmander, LS, Dalen, N, Englund, G, et al, Intra-articular hyaluronan injections in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled multicentre trial. Hyaluronan Multicentre Trial Group. Ann Rheum Dis. 1996;55(7):424–431. image

23. Altman, RD, Moskowitz, R, Intraarticular sodium hyaluronate (Hyalgan) in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized clinical trial. Hyalgan Study Group. J Rheumatol. 1998;25(11):2203–2212. image

24. Frizziero, L, Govoni, E, Bacchini, P, Intra-articular hyaluronic acid in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: clinical and morphological study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1998;16(4):441–449. image

25. Moskowitz, RW, Hyaluronic acid supplementation. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2000;2(6):466–471. image

26. Huskisson, EC, Donnelly, S, Hyaluronic acid in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology. 1999;38(7):602–607. image

27. Petrella, RJ, Petrella, M, A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of intraarticular hyaluronic acid for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(5):951–956. image

28. Cyriax, JH, 8th ed. Textbook of Orthopaedic Medicine; vol. 1. Baillière Tindall, London, 1982.

29. Fletcher, MR, Scott, JT, Chronic monarticular synovitis. Diagnostic and prognostic features. Ann Rheum Dis 1975; 34:171. image

30. Auquier, L, Cohen de Lara, A, Siaud, JR, Devenir de 173 monoarthrites et monoarthropathies d’allure inflammatoire. Rev Rhum 1973; 40:125. image

31. Iguchi, T, Matsubara, T, Kawai, K, Hirohata, K, Clinical and histological observations of monoarthritis. Anticipation of its progression to rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop 1990; 250:241–249. image

32. Jaffé, HL, Lichtenstein, L, Sutro, CJ. Pigmented villonodular synovitis. Arch Path. 1941; 31:731–765.

33. Wyllie, JC, The stromal cell reaction of pigmented villonodular synovitis: an electron microscopic study. Arthr Rheum 1969; 12:205–214. image

34. D’Eshougues, JR, Delcambre, B, Leonardelli, J, et al, Hemarthrose du genou: par chondrocalcinose ou par synovite villonodulaire? Rev Rhum 1976; 43:309–310. image

35. Chappel, R, Mortier, G, Herregods, P, et al. Gepigmenteerde villonodulaire synovitis: een niet zo zeldzame oorzaak van rcidiverende haemarthrose van de knie. Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1983; 39(18):1141–1144.

36. Henry, AN, Arthroscopy in practice. BMJ 1977; i:87. image

37. Granowitz, SP, Mankin, HJ, Localized pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 1967; 49A:122–128. image

38. Cloud, SR. Intra-articular thiotepa held effective in pigmented villonodular synovitis. American Rheumatology Association Western Region Meeting. Wellcome Trends Rheum. 3(2), 1981.

39. Goss, JA, Adams, RF, Local injections of corticosteroids in rheumatic diseases. J Musculoskeletal Med. 1993;(Mar)):83–92.

40. Dieppe, PA, Calvent, P. Crystals and Joint Disease. London: Chapman & Hall; 1983.

41. Moskowitz, RW, Garcia, F, Chondrocalcinosis articularis (pseudogout syndrome). Arch Intern Med 1973; 132:87. image

42. Caner, JE, Decker, JL, Recurrent acute arthritis in chronic renal failure treated by haemodialysis. Am J Med 1964; 36:571. image

43. Ramonda, R, Musacchio, E, Perissinotto, E, et al, Prevalence of chondrocalcinosis in Italian subjects from northeastern Italy. The Pro.V.A. (PROgetto Veneto Anziani) study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009;27(6):981–984. image

44. Passler, J, Fellinger, M, Seggl, W, Der posttraumatische Hämarthros des Kniegelenkes – eine Indikation zur Arthroskopie. Akt Traumatol 1989; 19:135–138. image

45. Bomberg, BC, McGinty, JB, Acute hemarthrosis of the knee: indications for diagnostic arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 1990;6(3):221–225. image

46. Maffulli, N, Binfield, PM, King, JB, Good, CJ, Acute haemarthrosis of the knee in athletes. A prospective study of 106 cases. J Bone Joint Surg 1993; 75B:945–949. image

47. Dustmann, HO, Knorpelveränderungen beim Hämarthros unter besonderen Berücksichtigiung der Ruhigstellung. Arch Orthop Unfallchirurg 1971; 71:148. image

48. Convery, FR, Experimental hemarthrosis in the knee of the mature canine. Arthritis Rheum 1976; 19:59–67. image

49. Cotta, H, Puhl, W, Niethard, FU, Der Einfluss des Hämarthros auf den Knorpel der Gelenke. Unfallchir 1982; 8:145–151. image

50. Riley, SA, Spencer, GE, Jr., Destructive monarticular arthritis secondary to anticoagulant therapy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987; 223:247–251. image

51. Ross, MD, Elliott, R, Acute knee haemarthrosis: a case report describing diagnosis and management for a patient on anticoagulation medication. Physiother Res Int. 2011;16(2):120–123. image

52. Phelip, X, Verdier, JM, Gras, JP, et al, Les Hémarthroses de la chondrocalcinose articulaire. Rev Rhum 1976; 43:259–266. image

53. Ottaviani, S, Ayral, X, Dougados, M, Gossec, L, Pigmented villonodular synovitis: a retrospective single-center study of 122 cases and review of the literature. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011;40(6):539–546. image

54. Moskovich, R, Parisien, JS, Localized pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee. Arthroscopic treatment. Clin Orthop 1991; 271:218–224. image

55. Goldenberg, DL, Reed, JI, Bacterial arthritis. N Engl J Med 1985; 312:764–769. image

56. Meijers, KA, Dijkmans, BA, Hermans, J, et al, Non-gonococcal infectious arthritis: a retrospective study. J Infect 1987; 14:13–20. image

57. Goldenberg, DL, Cohen, AS, Acute infectious arthritis: a review of patients with nongonococcal joint infections. Am J Med 1976; 60:369. image

58. Mielants, H, Dhondt, E, Goethals, L, et al, Long-term functional results of non-surgical treatment of common bacterial infections of joints. Scand J Rheumatol 1981; 11:101. image

59. Terry, GC, Tagert, BE, Young, MJ, Reliability of the clinical assessment in predicting the cause of internal derangement of the knee. Arthroscopy 1995; 11:568–576. image

60. Jeannopoulos, CL, Observation of discoid menisci. J Bone Joint Surg 1950; 32A:649–652. image

61. Dickhaut, SC, Delee, JC, The discoid lateral meniscus syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg 1982; 64A:1068–1073. image

62. Woods, GW, Whelan, JM, Discoid meniscus. Clin Sports Med. 1990;9(3):695–706. image

63. Yaniv, M, Blumberg, N, The discoid meniscus. J Child Orthop. 2007;1(2):89–96. image

64. Samoto, N, Kozuma, M, Tokuhisa, T, Kobayashi, K, Diagnosis of discoid lateral meniscus of the knee on MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 20:59–64. image

65. Kobayashi, A. Discoid meniscus of the knee joint. Clin Orthop Surg Jpn. 1975; 10:10–24.

66. Bullough, PG, Vosburgh, F, Arnoczky, SP, Levy, IM. The menisci of the knee. In: Insall J, ed. Surgery of the Knee. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1984:135.

67. Poehling, GG, Ruch, DS, Chabon, SJ, The landscape of meniscal injuries. Clin Sports Med. 1990;9(3):539–549. image

68. Weiss, CB, Lundberg, M, Hamberg, P, et al, Non-operative treatment of meniscal tears. J Bone Joint Surg 1989; 71A:811. image

69. Satku, K, Kumar, JP, Ngoi, SS, Anterior cruciate ligament injuries: to counsel or operate? J Bone Joint Surg 1986; 68B:458–461. image

70. Bray, RC, Dandy, DJ, Meniscal lesions and chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg 1989; 71B:128–130. image

71. Egner, E, Knee joint meniscal degeneration as it relates to tissue fiber structure and mechanical resistance. Pathol Res Pract 1982; 173:310. image

72. Smillie, IS, The current pattern of internal derangements of the knee joint relative to the menisci. Clin Orthop 1967; 51:117. image

73. Hadfield, G, Immobile meniscus syndrome. Proc R Soc Med 1966; 59:117. image

74. Noble, J, Turner, P, The function, pathology and surgery of the meniscus. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1986; 210:62–68. image

75. Fahmy, NR, Williams, E, Noble, J, Meniscal pathology and osteoarthrosis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 1983; 65B:24. image

76. Dandy, DJ. Arthroscopic Surgery of the Knee. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1981.

77. McGinty, JB, Matza, RA, Arthroscopy of the knee. Evaluation of an out-patient procedure under local anaesthetic. J Bone Joint Surg 1978; 60A:787–789. image

78. Casscells, SW, Technology: a good servant but a bad master. Arthroscopy. 1990;6(1):1–2. image

79. Goodfellow, J, He who hesitates is saved ’. J Bone Joint Surg 1980; 62B:1–2. image

80. Noble, J, Hambden, DL, The pathology of the degenerate meniscus lesion. J Bone Joint Surg 1975; 57B:180. image

81. Noble, J, Lesions of the menisci. J Bone Joint Surg 1977; 59A:480. image

82. Casscells, SW, The place of arthroscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of internal derangement of the knee: an analysis of 1000 cases. Clin Orthop 1980; 151:135. image

83. Fitzgibbons, RE, Shelbourne, KD, ‘Aggressive’ nontreatment of lateral meniscal tears seen during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23(2):156–159. image

84. Hargreaves, DJ, Seedhom, BB. On the ‘bucket handle’ tear: partial or total meniscectomy? A quantitative study. J Bone Joint Surg. 1979; 61B:381.

85. Bourne, RB, Finlay, JB, Papadopoulos, P, Andreae, P, The effect of medial meniscectomy on strain distribution in the proximal part of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg 1984; 66B:1431. image

86. Walker, PS, Erkman, MJ, The role of the menisci in force transmission across the knee. Clin Orthop 1975; 109:184–192. image

87. Dandy, DJ, Jackson, RW, The diagnosis of problems after meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg. 1975;57B(3):349–352. image

88. Johnson, RJ, Kettelkamp, DB, Clark, W, Leaverton, P, Factors affecting later results after meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg 1974; 56A:712–729. image

89. Noble, J, Erat, K, In defence of the meniscus: a prospective study of two hundred meniscectomy patients. J Bone Joint Surg. 1980;62(B):6–11. image

90. Floman, Y, Eyre, DR, Glincher, MJ, Induction of osteoarthrosis in the rabbit knee joint: biomechanical studies on the articular cartilage. Clin Orthop 1980; 147:278. image

91. Glosh, P, Sutherland, JM, Taylor, TKF, et al, The effects of post-operative joint immobilization of articular cartilage degeneration, following meniscectomy. J Surg Res 1983; 35:461. image

92. Neyret, P, Donell, ST, Dejour, D, Dejour, H, Partial meniscectomy and anterior ligament rupture in soccer players; a study with a minimum 20 year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21:455–460. image

93. Burke, DL, Ahmed, AM. Biomechanical study of partial and total medial meniscectomy of the knee. Trans Orthop Res Soc. 1978; 3:91.

94. Bourne, R. Menisci distribute weight. Med Post. 1980; 16:29.

95. Dandy, DJ, Early results of closed partial meniscectomy. BMJ 1978; ii:1099. image

96. Jackson, RW, Dandy, DJ. Partial meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg. 1976; 58(B):142.

97. McGinty, JB, Guess, LF, Marvin, RA, Partial or total meniscectomy. A comparative analysis. J Bone Joint Surg 1977; 59A:763–766. image

98. Northmore-Ball, MD, Dandy, DJ, Jackson, RW, Arthroscopic, open partial and total meniscectomy: a comparative study. J Bone Joint Surg 1983; 65B:400. image

99. Lyshom, J, Gillquist, J, Endoscopic meniscectomy – a follow-up study. Int Orthop 1981; 5:265–270. image

100. Hamberg, P, Gillquist, J, Lysholm, J, A comparison between arthroscopic meniscectomy and modified open meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg 1984; 66B:189–192. image

101. Cassidy, RE, Shaffer, AJ, Repair of peripheral meniscus tears. A preliminary report. Am J Sports Med 1981; 9:209–214. image

102. De Haven, KE. Peripheral meniscus repair. An alternative to meniscectomy. Orthop Trans. 1981; 5:399–400.

103. Hennings, CE. Arthroscopic repair of meniscus tears. Orthopedics. 1983; 6:1130.

104. Rosenberg, TD, Scott, SM, Coward, DB, et al, Arthroscopic meniscal repair evaluated with repeat arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 1986; 2:14. image

105. Barber, FA, Stone, RG, Meniscal repair, an arthroscopic technique. J Bone Joint Surg 1985; 67B:39–v41. image

106. Albrecht-Olsen, PM, Bak, K, Arthroscopic repair of the bucket-handle meniscus. 10 failures in 27 stable knees followed for 3 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64:446–448. image

107. Hamberg, P, Gillquist, J, Lysholm, J, Suture of new and old peripheral meniscus tears. J Bone Joint Surg. 1983;65A(2):120–124. image

108. Shelbourne, KD, Porter, DA, Meniscal repair. Description of a surgical technique. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21(6):870–872. image

109. Logan, M, Watts, M, Owen, J, Myers, P, Meniscal repair in the elite athlete: results of 45 repairs with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(6):1131–1134. image

110. Eggli, S, Wegmuller, H, Kosina, J, et al, Long-term results of arthroscopic meniscal repair: an analysis of isolated tears. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23:715–720. image

111. DeHaven, KE, Lohrer, WA, Lovelock, JE, Long-term results of open meniscal repair. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23(5):524–530. image

112. Toman, CV, Dunn, WR, Spindler, KP, et al, Success of meniscal repair at anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(6):1111–1115. image

113. Bonnin, JG, Cysts of the semilunar cartilages of the knee joint. Br J Surg 1953; 40:558–565. image

114. Wroblenski, BM, Trauma and the cystic meniscus: review of 500 cases. Injury 1973; 4:319–321. image

115. Pisani, AJ, Pathognomonic sign for cyst of the knee cartilage. Arch Surg 1947; 54:188. image

116. Tyson, LL, Daughters, TC, Jr., Ryu, RK, Crues, JV, 3rd., MRI appearance of meniscal cysts. Skeletal Radiol. 1995;24(6):421–424. image

117. Lantz, B, Singer, KM, Meniscal cysts. Clin Sports Med 1990; 9:707–725. image

118. Seger, BM, Woods, WG, Arthroscopic management of lateral meniscus cysts. Am J Sports Med 1986; 14:105. image

119. Pariesien, JS, Arthroscopic treatment of cysts of the menisci. Clin Orthop 1990; 257:154–158. image

120. Tudisco, C, Meo, A, Blasucci, C, Ippolito, E, Arthroscopic treatment of lateral meniscal cysts using an outside-in technique. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(5):683–686. image

121. Mitrovic, D, Stankovic, A, Borda-Iriarte, O, et al, Résultats de l’examen autopsique des cartilages des genoux chez 120 sujets décédés en milieu hospitalier. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 1987; 54:15. image

122. MacNicol, MF. The Problem Knee: Diagnosis and Management in the Younger Patient. London: Heinemann; 1986.

123. Bradley, J, Dandy, DJ, Osteochondritis dissecans and other lesions of the femoral condyles. J Bone Joint Surg 1989; 71B:518–522. image

124. Aircroth, PM, Osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 1971; 32B:440–447. image

125. Greenspan, A. Orthopaedic Radiology: A Practical Approach. New York: Raven Press; 1992.

126. Wilson, JN, Wilson’s sign. A diagnostic sign in osteochondrosis dissecans of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 1967; 49A:477. image

127. Wall, EJ, Vourazeris, J, Myer, GD, et al, The healing potential of stable juvenile osteochondritis dissecans knee lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(12):2655–2664. image

128. Kocher, MS, Tucker, R, Ganley, TJ, Flynn, JM, Management of osteochondritis dissecans of the knee: current concepts review. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34:1181–1191. image

129. Anderson, AF, Pagnani, MJ, Osteochondritis dissecans of the femoral condyles: long-term results of excision of the fragment. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25(6):830–834. image

130. Kornaat, PR, Bloem, JL, Ceulemans, RY, et al, Osteoarthritis of the knee: association between clinical features and MR imaging findings. Radiology. 2006;239(3):811–817. image

131. Steadman, JR, Ramappa, AJ, Maxwell, RB, Briggs, KK, An arthroscopic treatment regimen for osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(9):948–955. image

132. Stuart, MJ, Lubowitz, JH, What, if any, are the indications for arthroscopic debridement of the osteoarthritic knee? Arthroscopy. 2006;22(3):238–239. image

133. Guhl, FG, Operative arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 1979;7(6):328–335. image

134. Lotke, PA, Ecker, ML, Osteonecrosis of the knee. Current concepts review. J Bone Joint Surg. 1988;70A(3):470–473. image

135. Lotke, PA, Ecker, ML, Osteonecrosis of the knee. Orthop Clin North Am 1985; 16:797–808. image

136. Marmor, L, Osteonecrosis of the knee. Lateral and medial involvement. Clin Orthop 1984; 185:195–196. image

137. Bauer, GCH, Smith, EM, Sr., Scintimetry in osteoarthritis of the knee. J Nucl Med 1969; 10:109–116. image

138. Insall, JN, Aglietti, P, Bullough, PG. Osteonecrosis. In: Insall JN, ed. Surgery of the Knee. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1984:527–549.

139. Koshino, T, The treatment of spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee by high tibial osteotomy with and without bone-grafting or drilling of the lesion. J Bone Joint Surg 1982; 64A:47–58. image

140. Hardaker, WT, Whipple, TL, Basset, FH, Diagnosis and treatment of the plica syndrome of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 1980; 62A:221. image

141. Blackburn, TA, Eiland, G, Bandy, WD, et al, An introduction to the plica. J Orthop Sp Phys Ther 1982; 4:85–87. image

142. Vaughan-Lane, T, Dandy, DJ, The synovial shelf syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg 1982; 64B:475–476. image

143. Platel, D, Plica as a cause of anterior knee pain. Orthop Clin North Am 1986; 17:273–277. image

144. Iino, S. Normal arthroscopic findings of the knee joint in adult cadavers. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1939; 14:467–523.

145. He, R, Yang, L, Guo, L, Painful locking of the knee due to bucket handle tear of mediopatellar plica. Chin J Traumatol. 2011;14(2):117–119. image

146. Broom, HJ, Fulkerson, JP, The plica syndrome: a new perspective. Orthop Clin North Am 1986; 17:279–281. image

147. Johnson, DP, Eastwood, DM, Witherow, PJ, Symptomatic synovial plicae of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 1993; 75A:1485–1495. image

148. Dupont, JY, Synovial plicae of the knee. Controversies and review. Clin Sports Med. 1997;16(1):87–122. image

149. Rovere, GD, Adair, D, Medial synovial shelf plica syndrome: treatment by intraplical steroid injection. Am J Sports Med 1985; 13:383–386. image

150. Amatuzzi, MM, Fazzi, A, Varella, MH, Pathologic synovial plica of the knee. Results of conservative treatment. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18(5):466–469. image

151. Camanho, GL, Treatment of pathological synovial plicae of the knee. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2010;65(3):247–250. image

152. Calvo, RD, Holden, SC, Sterling, JC, et al. Managing plica syndrome of the knee. Phys Sportsmed. 1990; 18:64–74.

153. Sakakibara, JO, Watanabe, M. Arthroscopy study on Iino’s band. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1976; 50:513–522.

154. Lee, JK, Yao, L, Tibial collateral ligament bursa: MR imaging. Radiology. 1991;178(3):855–857. image

155. Kerlan, R, Glousman, R, Tibial collateral ligament bursitis. Am J Sports Med. 1988;16(4):344–346. image

156. Schuldt, DR, Wolfe, RD, Clinical and arthrographic findings in meniscal cysts. Radiology 1980; 134:49–52. image

157. Rothstein, CP, Laorr, A, Helms, CA, Tirman, PF, Semimembranosus-tibial collateral ligament bursitis: MR imaging findings. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166(4):875–877. image

158. Ombregt, L, Bursitis ter hoogte van het ligamentum collaterale mediale van de knie. Cyriax Info 1989; 2:5–6. image

159. Ho, G, Tice, AD, Comparison of nonseptic and septic bursitis. Arch Intern Med 1979; 139:1269–1273. image

160. Quayle, JB, Robinson, MP, An operation for chronic prepatellar bursitis. J Bone Joint Surg 1976; 58B:504–506. image

161. Noble, CA, Iliotibial band friction syndrome in runners. Am J Sports Med 1980; 4:232–234. image

162. Demeyere, N, De Maeseneer, M, Van Roy, P, et al, Imaging of semimembranosus bursitis: MR findings in three patients and anatomical study. JBR-BTR. 2003;86(6):332–334. image

163. Reilly, JP, Nicholas, JA, The chronically inflamed bursa. Clin Sports Med 1987; 6:345–370. image

164. Rennie, WJ, Saifuddin, A, Pes anserine bursitis: incidence in symptomatic knees and clinical presentation. Skeletal Radiol. 2005;34(7):395–398. image

165. Larsson, LG, Baun, J, The syndrome of anserina bursitis: an overlooked diagnosis. Arthritis Rheum 1985; 28:1062–1065. image

166. Massari, L, Faccini, R, Lupi, L, Bighi, S, Diagnosis and treatment of popliteal cysts. Chir Organi Mov. 1990;75(3):245–252. image

Share this: