Each nerve root is attached to the spinal cord by four to eight rootlets that are splayed out in a longitudinal direction (Rankine, 2004). The dorsal roots are attached to the spinal cord at a well-defined posterolateral sulcus. The ventral rootlets are more widely separated and emerge over a greater area. At each spinal cord segment, a pair of dorsal and ventral roots unite just beyond the DRG to form a short mixed spinal nerve that divides into a thin dorsal ramus and a thicker ventral ramus (Fig. 75.1). The dorsal ramus innervates the deep posterior muscles of the neck and trunk (the paraspinal muscles) and the skin overlying these areas. The ventral ramus (the large anterior branch) contributes to the intercostal nerve or the cervical, brachial, or lumbosacral plexus and thereby supplies the trunk and limb muscles.

Fig. 75.1 Relations of dura to bone and roots of nerve shown in an oblique transverse section. On the right, the relations between the emergent nerve and the synovial joint are seen, but the joint between the vertebral bodies is not in the plane of the section. Dorsal and ventral roots meet at the dorsal root ganglion in the intervertebral foramen to form the mixed spinal nerve. The small dorsal ramus is the most proximal branch of the mixed spinal nerve and serves the cervical paraspinal muscles (not shown). The dura becomes continuous with the epineurium of the mixed spinal nerve at the intervertebral foramen. The posterior longitudinal ligament helps contain the intervertebral disk (not shown), preventing protrusion into the spinal canal. CSF, Cerebrospinal fluid.

(Reprinted with permission from Wilkinson, M., 1971. Cervical Spondylosis: Its Early Diagnosis and Treatment. Saunders, Philadelphia.)

The nerve roots lie freely in the subarachnoid space, covered by a thin root sheath which is a layer of flattened cells continuous with the pial and arachnoidal coverings of the spinal cord. They lack the epineurial and perineurial coverings found in peripheral nerves. Compared with spinal nerves, the roots have many fewer connective tissue cells in the endoneurium and considerably less collagen. A capillary network derived from the radicular arteries provides the blood supply to the spinal nerve roots (Levin, 2002).

Where the nerve roots form the mixed spinal nerve, the pial covering of the root becomes continuous with spinal nerve perineurium, and the nerve takes the dural nerve root sheath through the intervertebral foramen to become continuous with the epineurium of the mixed nerve. At the intervertebral foramen, the root-DRG-spinal nerve complex is securely attached by a fibrous sheath to the transverse process of the vertebral body. In general, the DRG is located in a protected position within the intervertebral foramina, but at the lumbar and sacral levels, the DRG resides proximal to the neural foramina in an intraspinal location (Levin, 2002). There they may be vulnerable to disk herniation and the complications of osteoarthritis and lumbosacral spondylosis.

Nerve fibers, together with their meningeal coverings, occupy 35% to 50% of the cross-sectional area of an intervertebral foramen. The remaining space is occupied by loose areolar connective tissue, fat, and blood vessels. On computed tomographic (CT) and MRI scans, the fat acts as an excellent natural contrast agent that defines the thecal sac and nerve roots, allowing detection of nerve root compression.

The dorsal roots contain sensory fibers that are central processes of the unipolar neurons of the DRG. On reaching the spinal cord, these fibers either synapse with other neurons in the posterior horn or pass directly into the posterior columns. In the ventral root, most fibers are essentially direct extensions of anterior horn motor neurons (alpha, beta, and gamma fibers) or of neurons in the intermediolateral horn (preganglionic sympathetic neurons found in lower cervical and thoracic segments). In addition, ventral roots contain a population of unmyelinated and thinly myelinated axons that come from sensory and sympathetic ganglia (Hildebrand et al., 1997).

There are 31 pairs of spinal nerves that run through the intervertebral foramina of the vertebral column: 8 cervical, 12 thoracic, 5 lumbar, 5 sacral, and 1 coccygeal (Fig. 75.2). A feature of clinical relevance is the pattern formed by the lumbar and sacral roots as they leave the spinal cord and make their way to their respective DRG to form spinal nerves. In the adult, the spinal cord is shorter than the spinal column, ending usually between L1 and L2. Therefore, the lumbar and sacral roots descend caudally from the spinal cord to reach the individual intervertebral foramina, forming the cauda equina. The concentration of so many nerve roots in a confined area makes this structure vulnerable to a range of pathological processes.

Fig. 75.2 Relationship of spinal segments and nerve roots to vertebral bodies and spinous processes in the adult. Cervical roots C1 to C7 (i.e., all except C8) exit through foramina above the vertebral body of the same number. The C8 root passes through the C7-T1 neural foramen, and all thoracic, lumbar, and sacral roots leave the spinal canal below the body of the vertebrae of the same number. The spinal cord is shorter than the spinal column, ending between vertebral bodies L1 and L2. Lumbar and sacral roots form the cauda equina and descend caudally, beside and below the spinal cord, to exit at the intervertebral foramina.

(Reprinted with permission from Haymaker, W., Woodhall, B., 1953. Peripheral Nerve Injuries, second ed. Saunders, Philadelphia.)

Traumatic Radiculopathies

Nerve Root Avulsion

The spinal roots have approximately one-tenth the tensile strength of the peripheral nerves because of lesser amounts of collagen and the absence of epineurial and perineurial sheaths in the roots. Therefore, the nerve roots are the weak link in the nerve root–spinal nerve–plexus complex, and nerve root avulsion from the spinal cord typically results from a severe traction injury affecting the upper limb. Ventral roots are more vulnerable to avulsion than dorsal roots, a consequence of the dorsal roots having the interposed DRG and a thicker dural sheath. In most cases, root avulsion occurs in the cervical region. Lumbosacral nerve root avulsions are rare, with only 35 cases reported between 1955 and 1996, and when they occur are generally associated with fractures of the sacroiliac joint with diastasis of the symphysis pubis or fractures of the pubic rami (Chin and Chew, 1997).

Avulsion at the level of the cervical roots can be total, as for a motorcyclist injury, or can result in two clinical syndromes of partial avulsion. One is Erb-Duchenne palsy, in which the arm hangs at the side internally rotated and extended at the elbow because of paralysis of C5- and C6-innervated muscles (the supraspinatus and infraspinatus, deltoid, biceps). The second is Dejerine-Klumpke palsy, in which there is weakness and wasting of the intrinsic hand muscles, with a characteristic clawhand deformity due to paralysis of C8- and T1-innervated muscles. Injuries responsible for Erb-Duchenne palsy are those that cause a sudden and severe increase in the angle between the neck and shoulder, generating stresses that are readily transmitted in the direct line along the upper portion of the brachial plexus to the C5 and C6 roots. Today, motorcycle accidents are the most common causes of this injury, but the C5 and C6 root avulsions classically occurred in the newborn during obstetrical procedures. Brachial plexus injuries in the newborn are discussed in Chapter 80. Dejerine-Klumpke palsy occurs when the limb is elevated beyond 90 degrees and tension falls directly on the lower trunk of the plexus, C8, and T1 roots. Such an injury may occur in a fall from a height in which the outstretched arm grasps an object to arrest the fall, leading to severe stretching of the C7, C8, and T1 roots, or during obstetrical traction on the extended arm when delivering the baby arm first.

Clinical Features and Diagnosis

At the onset of root avulsion, flaccid paralysis and complete anesthesia develop in the myotomes and dermatomes served by ventral and dorsal roots, respectively. Clinical features supplemented by electrophysiological and radiological studies help determine whether the cause of severe weakness and sensory loss is root avulsion or an extraspinal plexus lesion. For example, C5 root avulsion results in virtually complete paralysis of the rhomboids and spinatus muscles (innervated primarily by C5) and a varying degree of weakness of the deltoid, biceps, brachioradialis, and serratus anterior (which receive additional innervation from C6). A clinical sign of T1 root avulsion is an ipsilateral Horner syndrome caused by damage to preganglionic sympathetic fibers as they traverse the ventral root to their destination in the superior cervical ganglion.

Electrophysiological tests include the measurement of a sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) and needle EMG examination of the cervical paraspinal muscles. In the setting of an isolated C5 root avulsion, the SNAP should be preserved despite complete anesthesia in the dermatome, because the peripheral axons and the DRG cell bodies remain intact. Needle EMG of the cervical paraspinal muscles permits separation of damage of the plexus and of ventral root fibers because the posterior primary ramus, which arises just beyond the DRG and proximal to the plexus as the first branch of the spinal nerve, innervates these muscles (see Fig. 75.1). Thus, cervical paraspinal fibrillation potentials support the diagnosis of root avulsion. Paraspinal muscles have also been evaluated radiologically in the setting of root avulsion. Contrast-enhanced MRI studies of the cervical paraspinal muscles showing severe atrophy were accurate in indicating root avulsion injuries, and abnormal enhancement in the multifidus muscle was the most accurate among paraspinal muscle findings (Hayashi et al., 2002). Intraspinal neuroimaging using postmyelographic CT or MRI usually demonstrates an outpouching of the dura filled with contrast or CSF at the level of the avulsed root (Hayashi et al., 1998). This posttraumatic meningocele results from tears in the dura and arachnoid sustained during root avulsion. Advances in MRI technology now provide high-resolution images that can demonstrate root avulsion and obviate the need for CT myelography (Rankine, 2004).

In most cases, these tests are helpful in ascertaining whether root avulsion has occurred, but clinical assessment may be challenging, and testing results may be ambiguous. The physical examination may be limited because of severe pain. An absent SNAP indicates sensory axon loss distal to the DRG but does not exclude coexisting root avulsion. Even when this test of sensory function points to avulsion of the dorsal component of the root, the status of the ventral root may remain uncertain if paraspinal fibrillation potentials are not found. There are two reasons for their absence. First, they do not appear for 7 to 10 days after the onset of axonotmesis, and second, even if the timing of the needle EMG is right, they may not be seen because of innervation of the paraspinal muscles from multiple segmental levels.

Treatment

Root avulsion produces a severe neurological deficit that was considered an untreatable injury up until a few decades ago. In the past 30 years, microsurgical techniques and intraoperative electrophysiological studies have improved prospects for recovery for many patients with severe injury to peripheral nerves. The procedures of neurolysis (freeing intact nerve from scar tissue), nerve grafting (bridging ruptured nerves), and neurotization, or nerve transfer (attaching a donor nerve to the ruptured distal stump), have all been employed in the management of root avulsion injuries (Rankine, 2004). After C5 and C6 root avulsion injuries, for example, the plegic elbow flexors may be restored by several procedures that provide for neurotization of the musculocutaneous nerve, including reinnervating the biceps with an ulnar nerve fascicle (Tung et al., 2003) or employing a branch of the accessory nerve using a sural nerve graft (Samil et al., 2003); intercostal and phrenic nerves have also been used (Rankine, 2004). Carlstedt and colleagues (1995) pioneered another approach—nerve root repair and reimplantation. They reported on a patient who had an avulsion injury involving C6-T1 in whom they were able to successfully implant two ventral roots (C6 directly and C7 via sural nerve grafts) into the spinal cord through slits in the pia mater. The surgical treatment of patients with avulsion injuries is an area of active ongoing investigation with the promise that if continuity between spinal cord and nerve roots can be restored, subsequent recovery of function may be possible (Fournier et al., 2001). The sometimes intractable pain of cervical root avulsion injuries may be successfully treated with dorsal root entry zone coagulation procedures (Samii et al., 2001).

Disk Herniation

Beginning in the third or fourth decade of life, cervical and lumbar intervertebral disks are liable to herniate into the spinal canal or intervertebral foramina and impinge on the spinal cord (in the case of cervical disk herniations), nerve roots (in both cervical and lumbosacral regions), or both (at the cervical level where on occasion large central and paracentral disk herniations may produce a myeloradiculopathy) (see Chapter 73).

Two factors contribute to this alteration in the intervertebral disks: degenerative change and trauma. The fibers of the annulus fibrosus that surround the nucleus pulposus lengthen, weaken, and fray with age and use, thereby allowing the disk to bulge posteriorly. In the setting of such changes, relatively minor trauma leads to further tearing of annular fibers and ultimately to herniation of disk material. This “soft-disk” herniation occurs mainly during the third and fourth decades of life when the nucleus is still gelatinous. In fact, although disk herniations may be preceded by unaccustomed strain or direct injury, in many instances there is no history of clinically significant trauma preceding the onset of radiculopathy.

Reinforcing the annulus fibrosus posteriorly is the posterior longitudinal ligament, which in the lumbar region is dense and strong centrally and less well developed in its lateral portion. Because of this anatomical feature, the direction of lumbar disk herniations tends to be posterolateral, compressing the nerve roots in the lateral recess of the spinal canal. Less commonly, more lateral (foraminal) herniations compress the nerve root against the vertebral pedicle in the intervertebral foramen (Fig. 75.3). On occasion, the degenerative process may be particularly severe. This leads to large rents in the annulus and posterior longitudinal ligament, thereby permitting disk material to herniate into the spinal canal as a free fragment with the potentially damaging capacity to migrate superiorly or inferiorly and compress two or more nerve roots of the cauda equina. Most cervical disk herniations are posterolateral or foraminal.

Fig. 75.3 Dorsal view of lower lumbar spine and sacrum, showing the different types of herniations and how different roots and the cauda equina can be compressed.

(Reprinted with permission from Stewart, J.D., 1993. Focal Peripheral Neuropathies, second ed. Raven Press, New York.)

In the cervical and lumbar regions, alteration in the integrity of the disk space is a component of a degenerative condition termed spondylosis, characterized by osteoarthritic changes in the joints of the spine, the disk per se (desiccation and shrinkage of the normally semisolid, gelatinous nucleus pulposus), and the facet joints. Immunohistochemical examination of herniated cervical disks points to an inflammatory process associated with neovascularization and increased expression of matrix metalloproteinase and inducible nitric oxide (NO) synthetase (Furusawa et al., 2001). The release of NO by disk cells may contribute to the process of disk degeneration by inducing apoptosis (Kohyama et al., 2000). Because it spawns osteophyte formation, spondylosis leads to compromise of the spinal cord in the spinal canal and the nerve roots in the intervertebral foramina. Restriction in the dimensions of these bony canals may be exacerbated by thickening and hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavum, which is especially detrimental in patients with congenital cervical or lumbar canal stenosis.

In the cervical region, nerve root compression in patients older than 50 years is often due to disk herniation superimposed on chronic spondylotic changes. Isolated “soft” cervical disk herniation tends to occur in younger people in the setting of neck trauma. In the lumbosacral region, isolated acute disk herniation is a common cause of radiculopathy in the younger patient (<40 years), whereas bony root entrapment with or without superimposed disk herniation is the more typical cause of lumbosacral radiculopathy in the patient older than 50.

Clinical Features

Root compression from disk herniation gives rise to a distinctive clinical syndrome that in its fully developed form comprises radicular pain, dermatomal sensory loss, weakness in the myotome, and reduction or loss of the deep tendon reflex subserved by the affected root (Carette and Fehlings, 2005). Nerve root pain is variably described as knifelike or aching and is widely distributed, projecting to the sclerotome (defined as deep structures such as muscles and bones innervated by the root). Typically, root pain is aggravated by coughing, sneezing, and straining at stool (actions that require a Valsalva maneuver and raise intraspinal pressure). Accompanying the pain are paresthesias referred to the specific dermatome, especially to the distal regions of the dermatomes; indeed, these sensations strongly suggest that the pain has its origins in compressed nerve roots rather than spondylotic facet joints. Sensory loss caused by the compromise of a single root may be difficult to ascertain because of the overlapping territories of adjacent roots, although loss of pain is usually more easily demonstrated than loss of light touch sensation (Fig. 75.4).

Fig. 75.4 The zones of radicular touch and pain sensation. The area for touch sensation (dark orange) supplied by one single root is wider than the area of pain sensation (light orange). Areas of pain sensation do not overlap or at most overlap incompletely, whereas areas of touch sensation of a single root are completely overlapped by those of the adjacent roots (A). Accordingly, monoradicular lesions (B) produce a hypalgesic or analgesic zone, while touch sensation remains intact or only minimally impaired. Only after two roots are involved is an anesthetic zone present.

(Reprinted with permission from Mumenthaler, M., Schliack, H., 1991. Peripheral Nerve Lesions. Diagnosis and Therapy. Thieme, New York.)

Most radiculopathies occur in the lumbosacral region; compressive root lesions in this area account for 62% to 90% of all radiculopathies. Cervical radiculopathies are less common, comprising 5% to 36% of all radiculopathies encountered.

In the lumbosacral region, 95% of disk herniations occur at the L4-L5 or L5-S1 levels; L3-L4 and higher lumbar disk herniations are uncommon (Deyo and Weinstein, 2001). Knowing that the L4 root exits beneath the pedicle of L4 through the L4-L5 foramen and that L5 exits through the L5-S1 foramen, one might predict that disk herniation at these levels would generally compress the L4 and L5 roots, respectively (see Fig. 75.3). In perhaps only 10% of cases of the disk herniating far laterally into the foramen is there compression of the exiting nerve root. More commonly, the posterolateral disk herniation compresses the nerve root passing through the foramen below that disk, so L4-L5 and L5-S1 herniations usually produce L5 and S1 radiculopathies, respectively.

In an S1 radiculopathy, pain radiates to the buttock and down the back of the leg (classic sciatica), often extending below the knee; paresthesias are generally felt in the lateral ankle and foot. The ankle jerk is generally diminished or lost, and weakness may be detected in the plantar flexors and gluteus maximus.

In an L5 radiculopathy, the distribution of pain is similar, but paresthesias are felt on the dorsum of the foot and the outer portion of the calf. The ankle reflex is typically normal, but there may be reduction of the medial hamstring reflex. Weakness may be found in L5-innervated muscles served by the peroneal nerve, including the extensor hallucis longus, tibialis anterior and peronei, as well as the tibialis posterior (served by the tibial nerve) and the gluteus medius (innervated by the superior gluteal nerve). Weakness may be restricted to the extensor hallucis longus. A positive straight leg–raising test result is a sensitive indicator of L5 or S1 nerve root irritation. The test is deemed positive when the patient complains of pain radiating from the back into the buttock and thigh with leg elevation to less than 60 degrees. The test result is positive in 95% of patients with a proven disk herniation at surgery. A less sensitive but highly specific test is the crossed straight leg–raising test when the patient complains of radiating pain on the affected side with elevation of the contralateral leg.

The less common L4 radiculopathy is characterized by pain and paresthesias along the medial aspect of the knee and lower leg. The patellar reflex is diminished, and weakness may be noted in the quadriceps and hip adductors (innervated by the femoral and obturator nerves, respectively). When large herniations occur in the midline at either the L4-L5 or the L5-S1 level, many of the nerve roots running past that level to exit through intervertebral foramina below that level may be compressed, producing the cauda equina syndrome of bilateral radicular pain, paresthesias, weakness, and attenuated reflexes below the disk level, as well as urinary retention. This is a surgical emergency requiring urgent decompression.

In the cervical region, it is likely that the greater mobility at levels C5-C6 and C6-C7 promotes the development of cervical disk degeneration with annulus fraying and subsequent disk protrusion. Cervical nerve roots emerge above the vertebra that shares the same numerical designation. Therefore C7 exits between C6 and C7, and spondylotic changes with or without additional acute disk herniation would be expected to compress the C7 nerve root. Similarly, disk protrusion at C5-C6 and C7-T1 would compress the C6 and C8 roots, respectively. In the classic study of Yoss and associates in 1957, clinical and radiological evidence of radiculopathy was found to occur most often at C7 (70%), less frequently at C6 (19%-25%), uncommonly at C8 (4%-10%) and C5 (2%). Radiculopathy involving the T1 root is a clinical rarity (Levin, 1999).

Involvement of C6 is associated with pain at the tip of the shoulder radiating into the upper part of the arm, lateral side of the forearm, and thumb. Paresthesias are felt in the thumb and index finger. The brachioradialis and biceps reflexes are attenuated or lost. Weakness may occur in the muscles of the C6 myotome supplied by several different nerves, including the biceps (musculocutaneous nerve), deltoid (axillary nerve), and pronator teres (anterior interosseous branch of the median nerve). The clinical features of C5 radiculopathies are similar, except that the rhomboids and spinatus muscles are more likely to be weak.

When the C7 root is compressed, pain radiates in a wide distribution to include the shoulder, chest, forearm, and hand. Paresthesias involve the dorsal surface of the middle finger. The triceps reflex is usually reduced or absent. A varying degree of weakness usually involves one or more muscles of the C7 myotome, especially the triceps and the flexor carpi radialis. Less common C8 root involvement presents a similar clinical picture with regard to pain. Paresthesias, however, are experienced in the fourth and fifth digits, and weakness may affect the intrinsic muscles of the hand, including finger abductor and adductor muscles (ulnar nerve), thumb abductor and opponens muscles (median nerve), finger extensor muscles (posterior interosseus branch of the radial nerve), and flexor pollicis longus (anterior interosseus branch of the median nerve).

Diagnosis

Diagnosis is aided by a variety of imaging techniques (e.g., plain radiography, myelography, CT myelography, MRI) and EMG testing (Carette and Fehlings, 2005) (see Chapter 73). Both diagnostic modalities—the imaging approach that reveals anatomical details and the EMG techniques that disclose neurophysiological function—agree in the majority of patients (60%) with a clinical history compatible with cervical or lumbosacral radiculopathy, although only the results of one study will be positive in a significant minority of patients (40%) (Nardin et al., 1999). Although plain radiography is unhelpful in the identification of a herniated disk per se, in both the cervical and the lumbar area, it reveals spondylotic changes when present. It also may be useful for identifying less common disorders that produce radicular symptoms and signs: bony metastases, infection, fracture, and spondylolisthesis, for example.

In the cervical region, the best methods for assessing the relationship between neural structures (spinal cord and nerve root) and their fibro-osseous surroundings (disk, spinal canal, and foramen) are postmyelography CT (unenhanced CT reveals little more than the presence of bony changes) and MRI. MRI is equivalent in diagnostic capacity to postmyelography CT and therefore is preferred. In the lumbosacral region, CT is an effective method for evaluating disk disease, but when available, MRI is considered the superior imaging study. Its excellent resolution, multiplanar imaging, the ability to see the entire lumbar spine including the conus, and the absence of ionizing radiation make it highly sensitive in detecting structural radicular disorders (Ashkan et al., 2002).

A variety of neurophysiological tests are used to assess patients with disk herniation: motor and sensory nerve conduction studies, late responses, somatosensory evoked potentials, nerve root stimulation, and needle electrode examination. Sensory conduction studies are useful in the evaluation of a patient suspected of radiculopathy because SNAPs are typically normal (because the lesion is rostral to the DRG in the intervertebral foramina) even in the face of clinical sensory loss, in contrast to the situation in plexopathy and peripheral nerve trunk lesions, where SNAPs are attenuated or absent. In the specific instance of L5 radiculopathy, however, because the L5 DRG may reside proximal to the neural foramen, if intraspinal pathology is severe enough, compression of the L5 DRG may lead to loss of the superficial peroneal nerve SNAP (Levin, 1998).

Needle EMG is the most useful electrodiagnostic procedure in the diagnosis of suspected radiculopathy (Wilbourn and Aminoff, 1998). A study is considered positive if abnormalities—especially acute changes of denervation including fibrillation potentials and positive sharp waves—are present in two or more muscles that receive innervation from the same root, preferably via different peripheral nerves. No abnormalities should be detected in muscles innervated by the affected root’s rostral and caudal neighbors. Reduced motor unit potential (MUP) recruitment (manifested by decreased numbers of MUPs firing at an increased rate) and MUP abnormalities of reinnervation (high-amplitude, increased duration, polyphasic MUPs) are also sought by the needle electrode but are not as reliable as fibrillation potentials in establishing a definitive diagnosis of radiculopathy. Absence of fibrillation potentials does not, however, exclude the diagnosis of radiculopathy. Two main reasons for this exist. First, examination in the first 1 to 3 weeks after onset of nerve root compromise may be negative because it takes approximately 2 weeks for these potentials to appear. At the early stages in the process of nerve root compression, the only needle electrode examination manifestation of radiculopathy might be reduced MUP recruitment resulting from either axon loss, conduction block, or both. Second, fibrillation potentials disappear as denervated fibers are reinnervated by axons of the same or an adjacent myotome beginning 2 to 3 months after nerve root compression (Fig. 75.5). Thus in the later phases of nerve root compression, the only needle EMG changes indicative of radiculopathy might be chronic neurogenic changes of reduced recruitment and MUP remodeling. The distribution of fibrillation potentials is relatively stereotyped for C5, C7, and C8 radiculopathies, whereas C6 radiculopathy has the most variable presentation. In about half of patients, the findings are similar to C5 radiculopathy, whereas in the other half, findings are identical to C7 radiculopathy (Levin et al., 1996). A patient with the uncommon disk compression of T1 was found to have isolated fibrillation potential activity of the abductor pollicis brevis (Levin, 1999).

Fig. 75.5 Diagram illustrating how muscle fibers denervated by a radiculopathy are reinnervated by collateral sprouting despite persisting root compression.

(Reprinted with permission from Wilbourn, A.J., Aminoff, M.J., 1988. AAEE Minimonograph #32: the electrophysiologic examination in patients with radiculopathies. Muscle Nerve 11, 1099–1114.)

Treatment

For cervical disk protrusion and spondylotic radiculopathy, the mainstay of treatment is conservative management—a combination of a period of reduced physical activity with use of a soft cervical collar, physiotherapy, and antiinflammatory and analgesic agents. Most patients improve, even those with mild to moderate motor deficits. Indeed, in some cases, herniated cervical disks have been observed to regress on MRI images, a circumstance that appears more likely to occur if disk material has extruded and becomes exposed to the epidural space (Mochida et al., 1998). Although there appears to be a short-term benefit to surgical decompression of an affected nerve root with regard to pain, weakness, or sensory loss, at 1 year, there is no significant difference between the outcome of surgical or conservative management (physical therapy or hard cervical collar immobilization) (Fouyas et al., 2002). A surgical approach may be warranted, however, in selected cases: (1) if there is unremitting pain despite an adequate trial of conservative management, (2) if there is progressive weakness in the territory of the compromised nerve root, or (3) if there are clinical and radiological signs of an accompanying new onset of myelopathy, although in a group of patients with mild or moderate myelopathy, those managed surgically had the same outcome (degree of functional disability) as those allocated to conservative treatment (Fouyas et al., 2002).

In the lumbosacral region, disk herniation and spondylotic changes respond to conservative management in more than 90% of patients. Bed rest had been recommended as the centerpiece of patient care, but controlled trials have demonstrated that back-strengthening exercises under the direction of a physical therapist, performed within the limits of the patient’s pain, result in more rapid resolution of pain and return to normal function (Vroomen et al., 1999). Follow-up MRI studies in conservatively managed patients indicate reduction in size or disappearance of herniated nucleus pulposus corresponding to improvement in clinical findings (Komori et al., 1996). Epidural corticosteroid injection may help relieve pain but does not improve neurological function or reduce the need for surgery (Carette et al., 1997). A single intravenous (IV) bolus of methylprednisolone (500 mg) given to patients with acute diskogenic sciatica of less than 6 weeks’ duration provided short-term improvement in leg pain, but the effect was relatively small, with no effect on functional disability, and transitory (3 days) (Finckh et al., 2006). When a patient population with sciatica due to a herniated lumbar disk is followed at regular intervals for more than 10 years, surgically treated patients report more complete relief of leg pain and improved function and satisfaction compared with the nonsurgically treated group. However, improvement in the patient’s predominant symptom and work or disability outcomes were similar in the two groups (Atlas et al., 2005). Three situations occur in which surgical referral is indicated: (1) in patients presenting with cauda equina syndrome, for which surgery may be required urgently, (2) if the neurological deficit is severe or progressing, or (3) if severe radicular pain continues after 4 to 6 weeks of conservative management.

Diabetic Polyradiculoneuropathy

Diabetic neuropathies can be classified anatomically into two major groups: symmetrical polyneuropathies and asymmetrical focal or multifocal disorders. Examples of the latter include the cranial mononeuropathies and the conditions covered in this section: thoracoabdominal and lumbosacral polyradiculoneuropathies. Though treated separately in the following paragraphs, they often coexist in an individual patient. Occasionally, a similar syndrome can occur in the cervical roots.

When there is predominant involvement of the thoracic roots, the presenting symptoms are generally pain and paresthesias of rapid onset in the abdominal and chest wall. The trunk pain may be severe, described variably as burning, sharp, aching, and throbbing. It may mimic the pain of acute cardiac or intraabdominal medical emergencies and may simulate disk disease, but the rarity of thoracic disk protrusions and the usual development of a myelopathy help exclude this diagnosis. Findings of diabetic thoracoabdominal polyradiculoneuropathy include heightened sensitivity to light touch over affected regions; patches of sensory loss on the anterior, lateral, or posterior aspects of the trunk; and unilateral abdominal swelling due to localized weakness of the abdominal wall muscles (Longstreth, 1997).

Diabetic lumbosacral polyradiculoneuropathy involves the legs, especially the anterior thighs, with pain, dysesthesia, and weakness, reflecting the major involvement of upper lumbar roots. A variety of names have been used to describe it, including diabetic amyotrophy, proximal diabetic neuropathy, diabetic lumbosacral plexopathy, diabetic femoral neuropathy, and Bruns-Garland syndrome. Because it is likely that the brunt of nerve pathology falls on the nerve roots, it can be designated as diabetic polyradiculoneuropathy. Motor, sensory, and autonomic fibers are all affected by the disease process (Dyck et al., 1999).

In most patients, onset is fairly abrupt, with symptoms developing over days to a couple of weeks. Early in the course of the condition, the clinical findings are usually unilateral and include weakness of muscles supplied by L2-L4 roots (iliopsoas, quadriceps, and hip adductors), reduced or absent patellar reflex, and mild impairment of sensation over the anterior thigh. As time passes, there may be territorial spread, a term used by Bastron and Thomas in 1981 to describe proximal, distal, or contralateral involvement as the polyradiculoneuropathy evolves. Worsening may occur in a steady or a stepwise fashion, and it may take several weeks to progress from onset to peak of the disease. At its peak, weakness varies in severity and extent from a mildly affected patient with slight unilateral thigh weakness to a profound degree of bilateral leg weakness in the territory of the L2-S2 nerve roots. Upper-extremity involvement appears to occur in approximately 15% of patients with diabetic lumbosacral radicular plexopathy as a unilateral or asymmetrical sensorimotor neuropathy that primarily affects hands and forearms. Like the lumbosacral syndrome, EMG findings suggest a multifocal axon-loss process localized to roots, plexus, or peripheral nerve (Katz et al., 2001). Rarely, the process of territorial spread is so extensive that it involves a multiplicity of nerve roots along the entire spinal cord and leads to profound generalized weakness, a condition designated diabetic cachexia.

Diabetic polyradiculoneuropathy tends to affect patients in the sixth or seventh decade of life who have non–insulin-dependent diabetes of several years’ duration. The syndrome of painful polyradiculoneuropathy, whether referable to thoracic or lumbosacral roots, may be the presenting manifestation of diabetes. In 30% to 50% of patients, the disorder is preceded by substantial weight loss of 30 to 40 pounds.

Laboratory studies disclose elevated fasting blood glucose in the vast majority of patients; when values are normal, they are found in treated diabetics. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate is usually normal, but in a subgroup of patients with diabetic lumbosacral polyradiculoneuropathy, it is elevated, a clue perhaps to an immune-mediated pathogenesis. The typical electrodiagnostic findings comprise features of a sensorimotor axon-loss polyneuropathy (diminished sensory and motor action potentials, normal or slightly prolonged distal latencies, and normal or mildly slowed conduction velocities) with additional needle electrode examination findings of active and chronic denervation changes in paraspinal, pelvic-girdle, and thigh muscles. Taken together, the findings reflect multifocal axonal damage to the nerve roots and lumbosacral plexus (Amato and Barohn, 2001). Although clinical findings may point to unilateral involvement, the electrodiagnostic examination generally discloses bilateral signs. Imaging studies of the thoracic and lumbosacral spinal canal with CT, myelography, and MRI are typically normal but are almost always necessary to exclude a structural abnormality of the nerve roots that may simulate diabetic polyradiculopathy. The CSF protein level is usually increased to an average of 120 mg/dL, but in some patients values exceed 350 mg/dL; pleocytosis is not a feature of this condition. Biopsy of proximal nerve sensory branches reveals axon loss and demyelination; in more severely affected patients, inflammatory cell infiltration and vasculitis is found (Said et al., 1997). Further studies of nerve biopsy specimens indicate that a microscopic vasculitis (involvement of small arterioles, venules, and capillaries) leads to ischemic injury, which in turn causes axonal degeneration and secondary segmental demyelination (Dyck et al., 1999). The presence of a small-vessel vasculitis with distinctive pathological features including transmural polymorphonuclear leukocyte infiltration of postcapillary venules and endothelial deposits of immunoglobulin (Ig)M and activated complement supports an immune-mediated inflammatory pathogenesis for this disorder (Kelkar et al., 2000).

Electrophysiological studies have suggested that a demyelinating polyneuropathy indistinguishable from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) occurs frequently in diabetes and may be the cause of a severe motor sensory polyneuropathy, sometimes with features of a plexopathy (Sharma et al., 2002a, 2002b).

The natural history of diabetic polyradiculoneuropathy is for improvement to occur in most patients, although the recovery phase is lengthy, ranging between 1 and 18 months with a mean of 6 months. Pain and dysesthesias improve or disappear entirely in 85% of patients; numbness improves or recovers in 50%; and strength is partially or completely restored in 70%. In some patients, episodes recur.

Therapy is usually directed toward ameliorating the severe pain of this condition. The tricyclics, especially nortriptyline (with a better side-effect profile than amitriptyline), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (e.g., sertraline, nefazodone hydrochloride), anticonvulsants (e.g., gabapentin, carbamazepine), clonazepam, baclofen, clonidine, mexiletine, IV lidocaine, and topical capsaicin may have a role separately or in combination. Histopathological findings indicative of an immune-mediated pathogenesis have led to treatment of selected patients with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or immunosuppressive treatment or both (Krendel et al., 1995; Younger et al., 1998). Although immunotherapy may be beneficial, spontaneous improvement in some patients with painful proximal diabetic neuropathy with different patterns of inflammatory nerve lesions has been described (Said et al., 1997). A comprehensive and critical review of the literature on the role of immunotherapy of diabetic polyradiculopathy concludes that treatment remains controversial because the natural history is for spontaneous improvement, the side effects of immunotherapy may be significant, and information on efficacy is lacking from controlled clinical trials (Amato and Barohn, 2001). Prospective studies have suggested a role for immunotherapy in the treatment plan of diabetic polyradiculoneuropathy where electrophysiological findings are those of CIDP (Sharma et al., 2002a, 2002b), although the degree of improvement has been shown not to be as robust as in the immunotherapy of idiopathic CIDP (Gorson et al., 2000).

The major differential diagnostic considerations are polyradiculoneuropathies related to degenerative disk disease and infectious, inflammatory, and neoplastic processes. These can usually be excluded by history, examination, and routine laboratory investigations including CSF analysis. In our experience, however, the clinical presentation provoking the most anxiety is the frail elderly patient not known to be diabetic who has weight loss and abrupt onset of lower-extremity pain and weakness that progresses over months. In such a patient, the specter of neoplasia looms large, and thorough imaging studies of the nerve roots and plexuses are mandatory.

Neoplastic Polyradiculoneuropathy (Neoplastic Meningitis)

A wide variety of neoplasms are known to spread to the leptomeninges. These include solid tumors (carcinoma of the breast and lung and melanoma), non-Hodgkin lymphomas, leukemias, and intravascular lymphomatosis (Viali et al., 2000). Although neoplastic polyradiculoneuropathy usually occurs in patients known to have an underlying neoplasm, meningeal symptoms may be the first manifestation of malignancy. Neoplastic meningitis occurs in approximately 5% of all patients with cancer (Chamberlain, 2006). The clinical features of neoplastic polyradiculoneuropathy include radicular pain, dermatomal sensory loss, areflexia, weakness of the lower motor neuron type and bowel/bladder dysfunction (Balm and Hammack, 1996; Mammoser and Groves, 2010). Often the distribution of the sensory and motor deficits is widespread and simulates a severe sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Associated clinical manifestations (e.g., nuchal rigidity, confusion, cranial polyneuropathies) result from infiltration of the meninges.

At postmortem examination, the cauda equina shows discrete nodules or focal granularity (Fig. 75.6). Microscopy discloses spinal roots encased by tumor cells, which appear to infiltrate the root. Malignant cells have the capacity to penetrate the pial membrane and invade the spinal nerves (Mammoser and Groves, 2010). It is presumed that disturbed nerve root function results from several mechanisms including nerve fiber compression and ischemia.

Fig. 75.6 Cauda equina in leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Seeding of multiple nerve roots by adenocarcinoma produces a nodular appearance.

(Courtesy Dr. T.W. Smith, Department of Pathology [Neuropathology], University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA.)

The most revealing diagnostic procedure is lumbar puncture, which is almost always abnormal, disclosing one or more or the following: mononuclear pleocytosis, reduced CSF glucose, elevated protein, and neoplastic cells (Grossman and Krabak, 1999). Spinal fluid cytological analysis is, however, persistently negative in up to a third of patients who have compelling evidence of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (Kim and Glantz, 2001). A sensitive electrophysiological indicator of nerve root involvement is a change in the F wave. In the symptomatic patient with cancer, prolonged F-wave latencies or absent F responses should raise suspicion of leptomeningeal metastases. Postmyelography CT adds strong evidence in support of the diagnosis if it demonstrates multiple nodular defects on the nerve roots, but spinal MRI, especially with gadolinium enhancement, is the initial test of choice in the cancer patient in whom leptomeningeal involvement of the spine is suspected (Gleissner and Chamberlain, 2006). Approximately 50% of patients with neoplastic meningitis and spinal symptoms have abnormalities on these studies. Gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the brain discloses abnormalities, including contrast enhancement of the basilar cisterns or cortical convexities and hydrocephalus.

Standard therapy for neoplastic meningitis is essentially palliative; it does, however, afford stabilization and protection from further neurological deterioration (Chamberlain, 2006). A multidisciplinary approach is recommended, with input from medical oncology, neuro-oncology, radiation oncology, and neurosurgery (Mammoser and Groves, 2010). With treatment that includes radiotherapy to sites of symptomatic disease, intrathecal or intraventricular chemotherapy (methotrexate, thiotepa, and cytosine arabinoside), and optimal management of the underlying malignancy, median survivals of 3 to 6 months may be achieved (Chamberlain, 2006; Kim and Glantz, 2001). On occasion, longer-term survival is observed in patients with neoplastic meningitis accompanying breast cancer (13% survival rate at 1 year and 6% at 2 years), melanoma, and lymphoma (Jaeckle, 2006). A complication of aggressive treatment is a necrotizing leukoencephalopathy that becomes symptomatic months after treatment with radiation and intrathecal methotrexate (Grossman and Krabak, 1999).

Infectious Radiculopathy

Tabes Dorsalis

Tabes dorsalis, the most common form of late neurosyphilis, begins as a spirochetal (Treponema pallidum) meningitis (see Chapter 53C). After 10 to 20 years of persistent infection, damage to the dorsal roots is severe and extensive, producing a set of characteristic symptoms and signs. Symptoms are lightning pains, ataxia, and bladder disturbance; signs are Argyll Robertson pupils, areflexia, loss of proprioceptive sense, Charcot joints, and trophic ulcers. Lancinating or lightning pains are brief, sharp, and stabbing; they are more apt to occur in the legs than elsewhere. Sensory disturbances such as coldness, numbness, and tingling also occur and are associated with impairment of light touch, pain, and thermal sensation. Sudden visceral crises, characterized by the abrupt onset of epigastric pain that spreads around the body or up over the chest, occur in some 20% of patients.

Most of the features of tabes dorsalis can be explained by lesions of the dorsal roots, dorsal root ganglia, and posterior columns (Gilad et al., 2007). Ataxia is due to the destruction of proprioceptive fibers, insensitivity to pain follows partial loss of small myelinated and unmyelinated fibers, and bladder hypotonia with overflow incontinence, constipation, and impotence is the result of sacral root damage. Pathological study discloses thinning and grayness of the posterior roots, especially in the lumbosacral region, and the spinal cord shows degeneration of the posterior columns. A mild reduction of neurons in the DRG occurs, and there is little change in the peripheral nerves. Inflammation may occur all along the posterior root.

The CSF is abnormal in active cases. Opening pressure is elevated in 10% of patients, and 50% have a mononuclear pleocytosis (5-165 cells/mL). More than 50% have mild protein elevation (45-100 mg/dL, with rare instances of values up to 250 mg/dL), and 72% have positive CSF serology. In all cases of neurosyphilis, antibodies specific for T. pallidum are found, and the preferred treatment is aqueous penicillin G, 2 to 4 million units IV every 4 hours for 10 to 14 days, with careful CSF follow-up. CSF examination 6 months after treatment should demonstrate a normal cell count and decreasing protein content. If not, a second course of therapy is indicated. The CSF examination should be repeated every 6 months for 2 years or until the fluid is normal.