Diseases of the Stomach

Published on 14/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Emergency Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1733 times

32 Diseases of the Stomach

Epidemiology

Dyspepsia refers to chronic or recurrent pain of gastroduodenal origin centered in the upper part of the abdomen. Dyspepsia affects 25% to 40% of people in industrialized nations, who regularly experience pain accompanied by any or all of the following associated symptoms: bloating, fullness, early satiety, nausea, anorexia, heartburn, regurgitation, and belching.1 Patients experiencing dyspepsia with endoscopic evidence of gastric mucosal inflammation are said to have gastritis, and those with ulcerations of the stomach or duodenal lining have peptic ulcer disease (PUD). Dyspepsia, gastritis, PUD, and the long-term complication gastric carcinoma represent a progressive spectrum of illness.

Dyspepsia accounts for 2% to 5% of annual visits to primary care physicians in the United States, and more than 1 billion health care dollars is spent on prescription medications for this disorder each year.1 PUD chronically affects large portions of the U.S. population and leads to impressive health expenditures because many affected patients leave the workforce. More than 7000 American deaths are attributed to PUD each year, largely as a result of perforation and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding.

In up to 60% of patients in whom dyspepsia is diagnosed, the results of endoscopic evaluation are nondiagnostic.1 The remaining 40% generally have one of three causative diagnoses: PUD, gastroesophageal reflux disease, or gastric cancer.2 The broad differential diagnosis of recognized causes of PUD is summarized in Table 32.1.

Table 32.1 Differential Diagnosis of Peptic Ulcer Disease

Cardiovascular

Gastrointestinal  Esophageal  Stomach Other

From Ferri FF. Ferri’s clinical advisor 2007: instant diagnosis and treatment. St. Louis: Mosby; 2006.

Duodenal ulcers occur three to four times more frequently than gastric ulcers worldwide, with men being affected more commonly than women for both ulcer types. The male-to-female ratio for duodenal ulcer (4 : 1) is higher than that for gastric ulcer (2 : 1). Such distributions are observed mainly in the developing countries of Africa and Asia. In westernized societies, the distribution of both ulcer types between the sexes has become more equal over the past few decades, although the mechanisms underlying these epidemiologic changes are unknown.3

PUD is the most common cause of upper GI bleeding in the United States and accounts for 27% to 40% of all cases.4 Patients with PUD who are at highest risk for upper GI bleeding include alcoholics, chronic users of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and patients with renal dysfunction.

Pathophysiology

The stomach is anatomically subdivided into three parts: the fundus, the corpus (body), and the antrum (Fig. 32.1).5 This subdivision reflects differences in function. The stomach functions as a reservoir for ingested meals, as well as the site of food agitation with gastric secretions—the first step in digestion (see Fig. 32.1). The acidic fluid is secreted by parietal cells in the fundus and body of the stomach under the control of hormones secreted by endocrine cells in the antrum. Acid secretion is controlled by the complex interaction of gastrin from G cells and histamine from enterochromaffin-like cells. Somatostatin further regulates these cells by inhibition (Fig. 32.2).

image

Fig. 32.1 Divisions of the stomach.

(From Zuidema G. Shackelford’s surgery of the alimentary tract. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1995.)

image

Fig. 32.2 Surface of the gastric mucosa.

(From Zuidema G. Shackelford’s surgery of the alimentary tract. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1995.)

PUD results from a complex interplay of factors that disrupt the delicate balance between the production of protective barrier agents, such as bicarbonate-rich mucus, and the hypersecretion of acid from parietal cells. Recognition of Helicobacter pylori as the causative agent of 90% of duodenal ulcers and 60% of gastric ulcers has led to a paradigm shift in the understanding and management of PUD.6

Infectious Causes

H. pylori, a gram-negative, helix-shaped bacterium, infects at least 50% of the population worldwide and is recognized as an important risk factor for the development of PUD and ultimately gastric adenocarcinoma and lymphoma. Infection is probably acquired in childhood and, in the absence of antimicrobial therapy, persists for life with an estimated lifetime risk for PUD of 15%.79 Risk factors for the acquisition of H. pylori include sharing of a bed in childhood, large number of siblings, lower socioeconomic status, and lack of a fixed hot water supply.6,19 Although it is still unclear whether transmission occurs person to person, three different mechanisms for such transmission have been postulated: fecal-oral, through saliva, and by vomitus.6,9

H. pylori causes acute dyspepsia characterized by epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting, and halitosis. Symptoms usually last several weeks and then disappear, although the organism loiters within the stomach. Gastritis persists throughout life in various locations; it shifts from an antrum-predominant pattern to a corpus-predominant pattern or pangastritis.10 The chronic phase of the disease is usually benign, but in susceptible individuals, complications such as gastric or duodenal ulcers may arise.

If sufficiently virulent, H. pylori gastritis leads to destruction of the gastric mucosa, which can ultimately result in the development of intestinal metaplasia or eventually carcinoma. The rate of gastric acid secretion declines, thereby fostering conditions beneficial to colonization of the gastric lumen by fecal organisms. H. pylori eventually disappears because the organism is ill-equipped to compete with a growing number of other organisms and is unable to thrive on metaplastic cells in the absence of hyperacidic conditions. Despite its eventual demise, the initial invasion of the stomach lumen by H. pylori incites conditions that favor the evolution of non-cardia–associated gastric cancer.6

Though most common, H. pylori is not the sole infectious cause of PUD. Helicobacter heilmannii, another spiral nonspirochetal bacterium transmitted via domestic animals and monkeys, has been associated with H. pylori–negative duodenal ulcers. It is much rarer than H. pylori, is less pathogenic, and can easily be differentiated by routine histology. Treatment strategies similar to those for H. pylori are successful in eradicating this organism.10

Additional infectious agents include cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex virus type 1, (HSV-1) and syphilis. CMV was first associated with peptic ulcers in renal transplant recipients and is the only organism to be significantly associated with peptic ulceration in persons positive for human immunodeficiency virus. The ulcers in these patients are usually gastric and numerous. The diagnosis is confirmed by the finding of intranuclear inclusion bodies or CMV DNA (or both) in the gastric mucosa on biopsy specimens taken from the base of the ulcer. HSV-1–induced ulcers are generally located in the antrum and often occur in immunocompetent individuals.10

Drug-Related Causes

In the absence of H. pylori, use of NSAIDs is the cause of PUD in up to 60% of patients.10 Because gastroduodenal damage does not occur in all patients taking NSAIDs, it is important to identify those at increased risk (Box 32.1). Factors associated with higher rates of NSAID-related GI complications are a previous history of PUD or hemorrhage, age older than 65 years, prolonged use of high-dose NSAIDs, use of more than one NSAID, concomitant use of corticosteroids or anticoagulants, and serious comorbid illness such as cardiovascular, renal, or hepatic impairment, diabetes, or hypertension.11 Many other drugs are associated with PUD and are listed in Box 32.2.

Crack cocaine and methamphetamines have been linked to PUD, as well as a higher rate of gastric perforation thought to be secondary to vasoconstriction and resulting local tissue ischemia. Additionally, tobacco and alcohol can further precipitate gastritis and PUD.11

Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) is an uncommon cause of PUD but should be considered in patients with refractory, atypically located, or numerous ulcers, especially in the absence of H. pylori or NSAID use.10,12 The ulcers in patients with ZES are caused by a gastrin-secreting tumor, or gastrinoma.

The incidence of ZES in the United States ranges from 0.1% to 1% in patients with PUD. The most common functional pancreatic tumors in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) are gastrinomas, and approximately 20% of patients with ZES also have MEN-1. The mean age at diagnosis is 50 years, but patients with ZES range in age from 7 to 90 years. Patients with both MEN-1 and ZES become symptomatic at an earlier age, with PUD usually developing in the third decade of life. The male-to-female ratio of patients with ZES ranges from 2 : 1 to 3 : 2.10,12

Patients with ZES commonly have symptoms of PUD such as epigastric pain, nausea, and vomiting. Alternatively, severe diarrhea may be the only symptom. Perforated ulcer remains a common complication; approximately 7% of patients with ZES are initially seen with perforation of the jejunum.12

Evaluation for ZES includes measurement of fasting serum gastrin and basal gastric acid secretion with a secretin stimulation test. Imaging fails to demonstrate the tumor in up to 50% of cases; nonetheless, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, radionuclide octreotide scanning, endoscopic ultrasonography, and the selective arterial secretin injection test are recommended for potential localization.12

All patients with sporadic gastrinoma who have resectable metastatic disease should undergo exploratory laparotomy for potential curative resection. Surgery may be the most effective treatment of metastatic gastrinoma if the tumor can be excised completely.

Idiopathic Ulcers

Once all known causes are excluded, a group of peptic ulcers remain that are then considered idiopathic. The etiology of idiopathic PUD is poorly understood but is thought to include a genetic predisposition, altered acid secretion, rapid gastric emptying, defective mucosal defense mechanisms, psychologic stress, and smoking.10 Management of idiopathic peptic ulcers is challenging because these ulcers are more resistant to standard therapy and are associated with more frequent complications. Patients who relapse may require long-term maintenance proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy.10

Presenting Signs and Symptoms

Dyspepsia refers to a group of symptoms attributed to various pathologic conditions of the upper GI tract, including epigastric pain, bloating, nausea, anorexia, fullness, early satiety, regurgitation, and belching.1,13,14

Classically, duodenal ulcer pain is described as a gnawing, hungerlike pain in the epigastrium with occasional but generally mild radiation to the back. The pain typically improves just after eating and worsens 2 to 5 hours after meals. Duodenal ulcer pain tends to be more pronounced in the early morning hours (11 PM to 2 AM) because of peak acid levels in the stomach at that time. Peptic ulcers have similar findings, although classically the pain intensifies with food intake, in contrast to duodenal ulcers. The pain in patients with untreated PUD tends to occur in clusters, with intermittent pain lasting weeks to months and asymptomatic periods between flares.

Several red flags should be considered when taking a history from patients with dyspepsia. These red flags increase the risk for gastric carcinoma as the cause of the patient’s symptoms and include age older than 45 years, unintentional weight loss, persistent vomiting, progressive dysphagia, odynophagia, unexplained anemia or iron deficiency, hematemesis, palpable abdominal mass, family history of GI cancer, and previous gastric surgery or jaundice (see the Red Flags box).14 Several ethnic groups also have a higher disease prevalence, including Afro-Caribbean, Hispanic, Asian, and Native American populations.14,16,17

Patients should be screened for historical features suggestive of disease progression and complications, including perforation, pyloric outlet obstruction, and hemorrhage. A change in the character of pain from vague, epigastric discomfort to severe, localized pain, especially with radiation to the back, can indicate perforation. Additionally, unremitting pain that was previously well controlled with food or antacids also suggests progression of disease.

Acute, severe, diffuse abdominal pain with or without referred shoulder pain may indicate recent perforation. Although nausea can be associated with dyspepsia, vomiting is less common; early pyloric stenosis should be considered if vomiting is a prominent feature.

Hemorrhage from upper GI bleeding may be manifested as syncope, melena, or hematemesis; consequently, GI bleeding should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with vague presyncope or syncope, especially those with risk factors for PUD.

Unstable vital signs suggest the possibility of massive GI bleeding in the setting of PUD. The overall appearance of the patient may be noteworthy for cachexia, which is concerning for underlying malignancy. Skin should be examined for jaundice and pallor, which is concerning for anemia.

Abdominal findings in the setting of uncomplicated PUD are generally normal or may be significant only for mild epigastric pain. Peritoneal findings suggest perforation.18

Differential Diagnosis and Medical Decision Making

The primary goal of emergency department (ED) evaluation of dyspepsia is to localize the source of the symptoms to the upper GI tract by excluding other life-threatening diagnoses, most notably acute coronary syndrome. Atypical acute coronary syndrome may have similar manifestations as PUD, especially in elderly, diabetic, and female patients. An electrocardiogram and cardiac markers should be evaluated in an all ED patients with a new onset of dyspepsia.

Other organ-specific conditions in the differential diagnosis include pulmonary disease (lower lobe pneumonia, embolism), pancreatitis, biliary disease, inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, gastroparesis, mesenteric ischemia, and abdominal wall pathology, including abscess, rectus hematoma, or musculoskeletal pain. Systemic and metabolic diseases that should be considered include sarcoidosis, thyroid disease, parathyroid disease, hyperkalemia, and hypercalcemia. The broad differential diagnosis of dyspepsia is summarized in Table 32.1.

A rare though serious infectious source of epigastric pain is phlegmonous gastritis caused by a bacterial infection of the stomach. This infection of mixed gram-positive cocci and gram-negative rods occurs in the setting of previous gastric pathology, including PUD, gastritis, gastric surgery, or carcinoma. These patients are very ill appearing, and treatment includes aggressive resuscitation, early antibiotics, and admission to the intensive care unit.

Although laboratory tests are not required in routine cases of chronic, recurrent dyspepsia, they are necessary in the evaluation of patients with a first episode of dyspepsia or a change in symptoms to exclude complications of disease progression or alternative cardiac, pulmonary, or GI conditions on the differential. A complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, lipase, and cardiac enzymes should be evaluated. Imaging is not generally indicated unless perforation with free air (upright chest radiograph) or biliary disease (right upper quadrant ultrasound) is a concern.

Medical Treatment

For patients in whom acute coronary syndrome can be excluded in favor of a diagnosis of gastritis or PUD, empiric treatment strategies and referral for diagnostic testing are appropriate.

For acute pain management in the ED, start with oral liquid antacids (e.g., Maalox, 30 to 60 mL orally) mixed with viscous lidocaine, 15 to 20 mL orally. The addition of an anticholinergic, antispasmodic agent such as Donnatal has no role in treatment. H2 blockers may be initiated in the ED, although the onset of action after both oral and parenteral administration of these agents is too slow to provide immediate pain relief. Parenteral H2 blocker therapy (e.g., Pepcid, 20 mg intravenously) may be most useful for patients with suspected ZES who will be admitted to the hospital. Parenteral narcotic analgesics should be administered to patients with pain uncontrolled by oral agents or to those in whom perforation or hemorrhage is suspected (i.e., oral medications are contraindicated).

In hemodynamically stable patients whose symptoms are not severe enough to warrant admission, three options are available for the management of dyspepsia not related to NSAIDs. The first option is a single, short-term trial of empiric antiulcer therapy with a PPI in a setting in which the patient has reliable follow-up.19 Cytoprotective agents such as sucralfate suspension may prevent further injury to the gastric mucosa and provide immediate relief of symptoms. Regardless of response, all such trials should be stopped after about 6 weeks and an evaluation performed if symptoms recur; further investigation is warranted earlier if the symptoms do not respond in 2 weeks. The second option is a definitive endoscopic evaluation, especially in patients with red flags by history, physical examination, or laboratory evaluation. The urgency for definitive diagnosis stems from a risk that gastric ulcers harbor malignancy in this population. The third option is noninvasive testing for H. pylori via serum antibody screening followed by outpatient prescription of antibiotics in H. pylori–positive subjects. For most low-risk patients, referral to a primary care physician for H. pylori testing plus initiation of symptomatic PPI therapy in the ED is the preferred option.13,20

Patients with known H. pylori disease who are either treatment naïve or were inadequately treated should start a regimen of either a bismuth-metronidazole-tetracycline combination plus a PPI or a PPI plus clarithromycin and either metronidazole or amoxicillin.21 When H. pylori is a consideration, endoscopy should be delayed for 4 to 8 weeks after discontinuation of antibiotics, PPI, and bismuth so that infection status can be more reliably assessed at biopsy.

Communicate with the patient’s primary provider if serologic testing was performed or empiric therapy for H. pylori was started so that the outpatient provider can arrange further diagnostic evaluation. Additionally, confirm with patients that they understand the treatment plan, the seriousness of the diagnosis, and which lifestyle modifications would aid in healing. Specifically, patients should be educated about the negative effects of smoking, excessive alcohol use, failure to follow up, and noncompliance with medication. Finally, patients should decrease or avoid the use of NSAIDs.19 If NSAID therapy must continue, the addition of a PPI will allow most duodenal and gastric ulcers to heal in timely fashion.10,19 Patients with healed NSAID-induced ulcers are among those at highest risk for further gastroduodenal injury and serious complications such as perforation and bleeding; strict return precautions should be provided for these patients.11

Sequelae of Peptic Ulcer Disease

Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. It is the third most common cancer in southeastern Europe and South America, and globally it is the fourth most common form of cancer.23 In comparison with the rest of the world, western Europe and the United States have a relatively low incidence of gastric cancer; the highest incidence of gastric cancer is reported in Japan, China, and South America.4 Gastric cancer rates remain quite high in some subgroups of African Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans. In the United States, the mean age at diagnosis is 48 years, and the male-to-female ratio is 1 : 1.23

Although certain well-established genetic factors predispose one to gastric cancer, such as blood type A, the main causative agents are environmental.24 H. pylori infection promotes apoptosis in infected cells, thereby starting a metaplastic path of destruction. Inhibition of E cadherin synthesis by H. pylori is also associated with the development of gastric cancer. The International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified H. pylori as a class I carcinogen, the only bacterial agent with this distinction.23

The prognosis of patients with gastric cancer is poor, with 5-year survival rates of less than 25%.23 The improved survival seen in Japanese populations has been attributed to identification of earlier-stage lesions by aggressive screening programs. Such screening programs are less common in the United States. ED patients with suspected dyspepsia and red flags must undergo urgent outpatient follow-up for endoscopic screening for gastric malignancy (Fig. 32.4).

Gastric Outlet Obstruction

Chronic peptic ulcers in either the stomach or duodenum may cause scarring and impair gastric emptying, a condition known as gastric outlet obstruction (Fig. 32.5). In adults, PUD is the major cause of benign gastric outlet obstruction—more than 95% of cases are associated with duodenal or pyloric channel ulceration. Resolution of gastric outlet obstruction after the eradication of H. pylori has been demonstrated in several studies. Symptomatic improvement can be seen a few weeks after the start of antimicrobial therapy for H. pylori, and the benefits seem to persist on long-term follow-up.25

image

Fig. 32.5 Gastric outlet obstruction—cancer of the antrum.

A markedly distended stomach with an air-fluid level is seen on computed tomography. In this case a mass in the distal end of the antrum is apparent (arrowheads).

(From Grainger RG, Allison DJ, Dixon AK, editors. Grainger & Allison’s diagnostic radiology: a textbook of medical imaging. 4th ed. St. Louis: Churchill Livingstone; 2001.)

Treatment of gastric outlet obstruction should start with pharmacologic eradication of H. pylori, even when the stenosis is considered to be fibrotic or when some gastric stasis is present. If such noninvasive treatment is unsuccessful, NSAID use may be the underlying cause.25 Dilation or surgery should be reserved for patients who show no response to medical therapy.

ED patients with signs or symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction should be admitted for gastroenterology consultation, hydration, and further management.

References

1 Friedman LS. Helicobacter pylori and nonulcer dyspepsia. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1928–1930.

2 Fisher RS, Parkman HP. Management of nonulcer dyspepsia. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1376–1381.

3 Sonnenberg A, Everhart JE. The prevalence of self-reported peptic ulcer in the United States. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:200–205.

4 Stabile BE, Stamos MJ. Surgical management of gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2000;29:189–222.

5 Ford AC, Delaney BC, Forman D, et al. Eradication therapy in Helicobacter pylori positive peptic ulcer disease: systematic review and economic analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1833–1855.

6 Axon A. Helicobacter pylori: what do we still need to know? J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40:15–19.

7 Pinto-Santini D, Salama NR. The biology of Helicobacter pylori infection, a major risk factor for gastric adenocarcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:1853–1858.

8 Peterson WL, Fendrick AM, Cave DR, et al. Helicobacter pylori–related disease: guidelines for testing and treatment. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1285–1291.

9 Calam J, Baron JH. ABC of the upper gastrointestinal tract: pathophysiology of duodenal and gastric ulcer and gastric cancer. BMJ. 2001;323:980–982.

10 Quan C, Talley NJ. Management of peptic ulcer disease not related to Helicobacter pylori or NSAIDs. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:2950–2961.

11 Singh G, Triadafilopoulos G. Appropriate choice of proton pump inhibitor therapy in the prevention and management of NSAID-related gastrointestinal damage. Int J Clin Pract. 2005;59:1210–1217.

12 Meko JB, Norton JA. Management of patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Annu Rev Med. 1995;46:395–411.

13 Kurata JH, Nogawa AN, Everhart JE. A prospective study of dyspepsia in primary care. Dig Dis Sci. 2002;47:797–803.

14 Talley NJ. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: evaluation of dyspepsia. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:1753–1755.

15 Vakil N, Moavvedi P, Fennerty MB, et al. Limited value of alarm features in the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:390–401. quiz 659-60

16 Goh KL, Cheah PL, Md N, et al. Ethnicity and H. pylori as risk factors for gastric cancer in Malaysia: a prospective case control study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:40–45.

17 Williams B, Luckas M, Ellingham JH, et al. Do young patients with dyspepsia need investigation? Lancet. 1988;2:1349–1351.

18 Suleiman S, Johnston DE. The abdominal wall: an overlooked source of pain. Am Fam Physician. 2001;64:431–438.

19 Soll AH. Consensus conference. Medical treatment of peptic ulcer disease. Practice guidelines. Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. JAMA. 1996;275:622–629.

20 Logan RP, Walker MM. ABC of the upper gastrointestinal tract: epidemiology and diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. BMJ. 2001;323:920–922.

21 Rimbara E, Fischbach LA, Graham DY. Optimal therapy for Helicobacter pylori infections. Nat Rev. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;8:79–88.

22 Jamieson GG. Current status of indications for surgery in peptic ulcer disease. World J Surg. 2000;24:256–258.

23 Zivny J, Wang TC, Yantiss R, et al. Role of therapy or monitoring in preventing progression to gastric cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;36(5 Suppl):S50–S60. discussion S61-62

24 Chan AO, Kuk JM, Hui WN, et al. Molecular biology of gastric carcinoma: from laboratory to bedside. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;14:1150–1160.

25 Gisbert JP, Pajares JM. Review article: Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric outlet obstruction—prevalence of the infection and role of antimicrobial treatment. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;16:1203–1208.