Diathermy and lasers

Published on 09/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Obstetrics & Gynecology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 1 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 5968 times

Chapter 4 Diathermy and lasers

Diathermy

Diathermy has been used in surgical procedures for over 100 years (d’Arsonval 1893) for cutting and coagulation of tissues. Harvey Cushing pioneered the use of electrosurgery in neurosurgery, using a generator designed by Bovie in the 1920s, and this name is still synonymous with diathermy to some surgeons.

Although diathermy is still a much-used tool in surgical practice, few surgeons have received formal training in its use. Operating theatres will often have a variety of diathermy units for which ‘standard’ settings are used without reference to the operating conditions. In conventional open surgery, this has only presented a few hazards. The development of laparoscopic and hysteroscopic surgery has greatly increased the number of applications for electrosurgery and has presented new dangers. Only by having an understanding of the principles of this energy source will surgeons avoid the risk of injury to the patient, theatre staff and themselves.

Electrosurgery refers to both types of diathermy, monopolar or bipolar, in which current passes through the patient’s tissue. In monopolar diathermy, the active electrode and return electrode are some distance apart. In bipolar diathermy, the two electrodes are only millimetres apart. Electrocautery refers to the use of a heating element in which no current passes through the patient.

Factors which influence the effect of diathermy

Diathermy current

The amount of damage or thermal injury that diathermy produces is determined by the current density and the size of the current.

The current density at the tip of a needle electrode will be very high because the current is concentrated into a small point. The plate used for the return electrode in monopolar diathermy has a large surface area of contact, resulting in a much lower current density. Any thermal effect will therefore be widely dissipated. This highlights the need for the whole surface of the plate to be attached securely to the body. If the plate becomes partially detached, the current density will be greater in the remaining attached part and a burn may result.

The size of the current is influenced by the voltage potential and the resistance to current flow according to the following equation:

image

Turning up the power output of an electrosurgical unit will increase the size of the diathermy current if the resistance remains constant. Some electrosurgical units can automatically alter the voltage potential to keep the current constant if the resistance changes; however, an alternative design approach allows for control of this voltage (voltage regulation).

The resistance of tissue varies particularly with its water content. Dry tissue has high resistance and moist tissue has lower resistance. Thus, during diathermy of an area of tissue, it is desiccated by the thermal effect and its resistance will increase. To prevent the current flow from falling, some modern electrosurgical units will increase the voltage output. The surgeon should be aware of this because there are additional hazards to working with higher voltages. Insulation failure, capacitance coupling and direct coupling are all more likely with a higher voltage.

Cutting and coagulation

Coagulation and cutting can be achieved by changing the area of contact or the waveform of the current. The cutting waveform is a low-voltage, higher frequency current but the area of contact is the main factor and a cutting effect is achieved when the cutting electrode is not quite in contact with the tissue so that an electrical arc is formed. This causes the water in the cells to vaporize and the cells to explode as they come into contact with the arc. The power and current levels will rise when cutting takes place inside a liquid-filled, relatively non-conductive cavity such as the bladder or uterus. The surgeon must be aware that if the resistance increases when using cutting current (e.g. when cutting through the cervix with a wire loop), some generators will produce a higher voltage to maintain current flow against the increased resistance.

When the electrode is brought into direct contact with tissue and the waveform is modulated, coagulation occurs rather than vaporization. An intermittent waveform is used and thus bursts of thermal energy are interspersed with periods of no energy (Figure 4.3). For the power delivered to the tissue to remain constant, the electrosurgical unit must deliver a higher voltage to compensate for the episodes when no energy is delivered (up to 90% of the time with pure coagulation current). Thus, whilst cutting current at 50 W power will produce a high-frequency current of approximately 200–1000 V, a coagulation current may produce over 3000 V to deliver the same wattage to the tissue. The coagulating effect is produced by slower desiccation and shrinkage of adjacent tissue, producing haemostasis. The higher voltage produced by coagulation current carries a higher risk of inadvertent discharge of energy.

If a mixture of the two types of waveform is employed, the advantages of both techniques are exploited. This is normally termed ‘blended’ output and many combinations are possible.

Heat and tissue injury

Diathermy current produces thermal injury to tissues. The temperature generated will dictate the degree of injury (Table 4.1). If carbon is seen on the tip of the diathermy electrode, the surgeon can assume that, at some stage, a temperature of 200°C has been reached.

Table 4.1 The degree of injury caused at different temperatures

Temperature (°C) Tissue effect
44 Necrosis
70 Coagulation
90 Desiccation
200 Carbonization

Bipolar diathermy

In bipolar diathermy, the current flows between two electrodes positioned a short distance apart because both contacts are on the surgical instrument. Lower power is employed since high power would damage the tips of the instrument. This is safer because the current flow is limited to a small area and lower power is used, but a cutting effect cannot be achieved. These features encourage some surgeons to employ bipolar diathermy exclusively in the laparoscopic environment. However, there is still a small risk of aberrant current flow because the patient, table and diathermy machine are all earthed. In addition, the tissue temperatures are much higher (340°C) and this factor alone can cause unexpected effects.

Bipolar current produces tissue desiccation and has been used commonly in tubal sterilization. More recently, in laparoscopic surgery, its value in coagulating major vascular pedicles has led to its use in laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy. The lower power employed also leads to less heat spread to adjacent tissues, which reduces the risk of injury to nearby delicate structures. Engineers are endeavouring to produce reliable bipolar dissectors and scissors to compete with the range of monopolar diathermy instruments available.

Instruments are now available which coagulate a pedicle with bipolar current and utilize a non-electrosurgical blade to cut the pedicle. These instruments are often referred to as tripolar instruments, although this is a misnomer.

Bipolar instrumentation has also been introduced into hysteroscopic surgery. A bipolar electrode may be employed in the outpatient setting for the removal of endometrial polyps. The distension medium used with these devices is saline rather than glycine. Saline is isotonic and therefore reduces the risk of fluid overload associated with a hypotonic solution such as glycine.

Short-wave diathermy

Electrode redesign has led to an interest in the use of short-wave diathermy for its tissue destructive effect (Phipps et al 1990). It has been used in endometrial ablation. In this, the two electrodes form a capacitor in the output circuit with the patient providing the dielectric medium between the two plates. Frequencies of approximately 27 MHz are employed with power levels of approximately 500 W. By altering the shape and size of the electrodes, heating effects may be localized or diffused as required. However, care must be exercised as the effects are not always predictable.

Diathermy safety

Three major safety issues with the use of monopolar diathermy have become apparent with the evolution of electrosurgery in laparoscopic surgery. Each of them involves inadvertent discharge of diathermy current. These issues are:

Insulation failure

Defects in insulation are most likely to cause a discharge of current when higher power is employed. The use of coagulation current carries a greater risk than cutting current. Insulation failure can occur at any point from the electrosurgical unit to the active electrode. The most common site of failure is in the instrument that contains the active electrode. With conventional surgical instruments, the most common site is the joint on diathermy graspers where repeated use wears away the insulation material. Any insulation breakdown, seen as sparks from the joint area, is usually clearly visible because the whole instrument is within the surgeon’s field of view. This contrasts with laparoscopic surgery where the field of view is much smaller and only a small part of the instrument containing the active electrode may be visible. Repeated discharges from a break in the insulation may occur without the surgeon being aware. Damage to insulation most commonly occurs when moving an instrument through the laparoscopic port. Although the port valve may cause damage, the most likely cause is scraping against the sharp edge of the inner end of the port, particularly one constructed of metal.

Concern about insulation failure has fuelled the debate about disposable and reusable instruments. Disposable instruments clearly have an advantage in that the insulation sheath does not have to withstand both repeated use and repeated cleaning cycles. However, disposable instruments are built to much less robust specifications and the insulating material may not withstand harsh treatment in a long case. It is important that surgeons and theatre nurses are constantly vigilant for evidence of trauma to insulation, and reusable instruments must be checked on a regular basis both during and between cases.

Whilst a metal port may cause more trauma to the instruments passing through it, it will allow discharge of diathermy current in the event of insulation failure. The large area of port contact with the skin should enable the current to be dissipated without serious thermal injury. A plastic port would not facilitate such a discharge and the current might therefore flow to adjacent bowel, causing damage that may not be recognized at the time. Sigmoid colon is the most vulnerable piece of bowel because of its proximity to a left lateral port. If a metal port cannula is used, a plastic retaining sleeve must not be used because this prevents any discharged diathermy current passing through the skin back to the ground plate.

Other safety issues

Lasers

A laser is a device capable of producing near-parallel beams of monochromatic light, either visible or invisible, at controlled intensities. This light can be focused, thus concentrating its energy, so that it can be utilized to treat various conditions. The term ‘laser’ is an acronym for ‘Light Amplification by the Stimulated Emission of Radiation’. The process of stimulated emission was foreshadowed by Einstein at the turn of the century, but it was not until 1960 that the first optical device was constructed (Maiman 1960). Since that time, many lasers have been made but comparatively few have found their way into gynaecological practice.

Basic laser physics

A laser consists of three main elements: a power supply, an excitable medium and an optical resonator (Figure 4.4). Atoms or molecules within the medium are raised to high-energy states (Figure 4.5A) by the power supply, and, under normal circumstances, these would decay to the ground state by the emission of energy as photons (Figure 4.5B). By confining the process to an optical cavity and restricting the decay paths, stimulated emission (Figure 4.5C) can take place. This process produces a build-up of photons (light) at a particular wavelength inside the cavity. The laser output is a small fraction of this which is allowed to escape from one end of the cavity.

Many substances have been found to be suitable laser media — solids, liquids, gases or metallic vapours — but the basic principles remain the same. A more detailed explanation of laser physics is provided elsewhere (Carruth and McKenzie 1986).

The radiation emitted is monochromatic (if only one decay path is involved), coherent and collimated. Collimation, or the near-parallel nature of laser light, can be exploited in many ways and is the main feature which makes such devices useful in the medical world. A single convex lens placed in the beam will bring it to a sharp focus, the size of which is dependent upon the width of the collimated beam. The use of different lenses or varying the lens-to-tissue distance alters the diameter of the beam at the point of contact with the tissue (Figure 4.6). This is referred to as changing the spot size.

The most important determinant of the effects of a laser upon tissue is the power density. This can be calculated approximately as:

image

where PD is power density, W is power output in watts and D is the effective diameter of the spot in millimetres. D can be measured by firing a short low-power pulse at a suitable target. The power density can be altered by changing either the power or the spot size, but the latter has the greater effect.

Light–tissue interaction

Light impinging on tissue is subject to the normal laws of physics. Some of the light is reflected and some is transmitted through the air–tissue barrier and passes into the tissue where it is scattered or absorbed. Obviously the extent to which each process dominates is dependent upon the physical properties of the light and the tissue. The theory of light–tissue interaction is not as well developed as that of ionizing radiation (Wall et al 1988), but enough is known to explain the macroeffects upon which most laser treatments depend.

At very-low-energy density levels (power density × time), say below 4 J/cm2, a stimulating effect on cells has been observed, but above this level, the effect is reversed and suppression occurs (Mester et al 1968). As the energy density rises to 40 J/cm2, indirect cell damage can take place if any sensitizing agents present become activated (e.g. haematoporphyrin derivative). Direct tissue damage does not take place until approximately 400 J/cm2, when the first thermal effects appear and photocoagulation occurs. Another 10-fold increase in energy density results in complete tissue destruction as it is sufficient to raise the cell temperature rapidly to 100°C, causing tissue vaporization. Obviously these are general observations and other properties of the incident beam will have an influence, but the general 10-fold relationship alluded to above holds although other parameters may be varied. Amongst the most important of these are the wavelength and the pulsatile nature of the radiation involved.

The wavelength absorption characteristics of various body tissues are reasonably well understood, qualitatively if not quantitatively. Figure 4.7 shows the absorption curves for water, melanin and haemoglobin which, to a large extent, will determine the curves for tissue as a whole. In the ultraviolet and the middle-to-far infrared spectrum, absorption by water predominates whereas melanin and haemoglobin effects take over in the visible range. From this graph, it is easy to see that a particular laser, operating at a fixed wavelength, will be preferentially absorbed by one tissue constituent and its effects will be different from those of another laser with a different wavelength.

image

Figure 4.7 Absorption characteristics of (A) water, (B) melanin and (C) haemoglobin at different wavelengths.

Source: With kind permission from Springer Science+Business Media: Lasers in Medical Science, Photophysical proceses in recent medical laser developments: a review, 1:47–66, 1986, Boulnois J.

So far, it is implied that the laser is operated continuously for long enough for thermal effects to appear [continuous wave (CW) mode]. However, it is relatively simple, by means of a shutter or a controllable power supply, to switch the energy on and off rapidly (pulse mode). In general, the medical definition of a pulse is a burst of energy lasting 0.25 s or less. This does not correspond to the physics definition of a pulse, and care must be taken to avoid confusion. Methods of generating these pulses differ between lasers and the tissue effects can also vary. The reason for this phenomenon is shown in Figure 4.8.

Figure 4.8A shows the output from a CW laser which is modulated by a perfect shutter. The average power delivered to the tissue can be calculated from a knowledge of the CW power, the pulse repetition rate and width. In the case of an electronically controlled high-pulse power system where the time–power curve is not so closely defined (Figure 4.8B), it is much more difficult to determine the average power delivered. It is necessary to measure the energy of the pulse and the pulse repetition rate. The peak power, although impressive, is almost irrelevant.

The effects on tissue of this pulsatile radiation are to reduce the pure thermal effects (lower average power input) whilst maintaining and sometimes enhancing the vaporization potential. Provided the pulse repetition rate is sufficiently low to allow heat dissipation to take place between pulses, the tissue temperature will stabilize at a lower value. These effects are analogous to those induced by modulation in diathermy output which leads to the differences between cutting and coagulation diathermy referred to earlier.

Very short pulses, such as those produced by Q-switched lasers, can cause electromechanical breakdown in tissues because of the extremely high energy densities obtainable. In the early days, these lasers were tested in gynaecology but untoward side-effects were noted (Minton et al 1965).

Common laser systems

Two laser systems established themselves in gynaecological practice during the 1980s:

These will be described in detail, with a further section devoted to other types of laser which are now entering general usage after extensive research.

Carbon dioxide laser

This is the system which has been most used in gynaecology since it was used for the first time in 1973 for the treatment of cervical erosions. This has been because of its clinical stability, ease of use, reliability and easy serviceability. It is a precise laser, especially in ultrapulse mode, making it useful for division of adhesions and accurate and safe vaporization of deposits of endometriosis (Sutton 1993). Although a major drawback is that its output cannot be transmitted by fibres, it has so far not been totally displaced by other lasers but is rivalled by modern diathermy equipment.

As the name implies, the active lasing medium is CO2 gas. Efficiencies of 15% energy conversion to light output have been achieved. In fact, an analyser has used this ability to detect CO2 in the breath! The first generation of CO2 lasers used a flowing gas system with high-voltage direct current excitation. A gas mixture of CO2, nitrogen and helium has been used to help achieve and maintain lasing conditions. Sealed tube lasers are now available with radiofrequency low-voltage discharges being used for excitation. This has made the machines smaller and removed the need for gas bottles.

The output radiation of 10.6 µm wavelength is well into the infrared region of the spectrum. This radiation is absorbed rapidly by tissue water, and therefore cuts and vaporizes more easily than it coagulates. Most of the incident radiation is absorbed within approximately 0.03 mm of the surface and intense heating occurs. Coagulation will only take place in small blood vessels less than 0.5 mm in diameter, but haemostasis can be facilitated by reducing the power density so that the zone of thermal damage around the central crater is wider.

As the 10.6 µm laser is invisible, an aiming beam must be used so that the operator can see where the therapeutic beam is going to have its effect. A helium–neon (HeNe) laser emitting at 628 nm (red) is incorporated into the system and optically aligned so that it coincides with the therapeutic beam. This alignment can degenerate and should be checked regularly.

As yet, there is no commercially available fibre which can transmit 10.6 µm light efficiently, so most commercial systems use some form of articulated arm. At each joint, there is a mirror which is adjusted so that the beam stays central despite movement between the two adjacent limbs of the arm. The choice of the mirror material is limited because of the need to reflect both the infrared CO2 beam and the red HeNe aiming beam. It is possible to use waveguide delivery systems to avoid the use of mirrors, but this limits the manoeuvrability of the complete system.

The final delivery to the operation site can be carried out in two ways, both incorporating a focusing lens. For hand-held surgery, the lens at the end of a straight delivery tube focuses the beam on the operative field approximately 1 cm from the end of the tube. The lens-to-tissue distance can thus be varied at will so that the spot size will be changed within a narrow range (Figure 4.9A). Colposcopic delivery involves a mirror after the focusing lens which brings the beam into line with the viewing axis of the colposcope. This mirror is at the end of a joystick so that the beam may be moved around within the field of view (Figure 4.9B). Originally the spot size was changed using lenses of different focal lengths and so was limited to three or four predetermined sizes. Nowadays, the use of zoom optics allows infinite adjustment over a limited range (0.5–4 mm).

Power outputs of these lasers can be from a few watts up to 100 W continuous. Most commercial systems in gynaecology produce up to 25–35 W as this, coupled with a variable spot size, provides power densities of up to 6000 W/cm2, sufficient for tissue cutting and vaporization at a controllable rate. The extra power provided by instruments producing 40–60 W is useful for dealing with patients who bleed during the procedure. Higher peak powers are available with modulation being employed to keep tissue temperatures within acceptable limits but with ‘cleaner’ cuts.

Neodymium:yttrium aluminium garnet laser

This device is a solid-state laser with the active neodymium ions being incorporated in an artificial crystal YAG. Pumping is achieved by energy input from a parallel gas discharge lamp, usually a water-cooled krypton tube, with the output radiation being refocused into the laser crystal. Output power levels up to 100 W continuous can be achieved, but, with a conversion efficiency of 1% or so, nearly 10 kW of input power is needed.

The energy produced is at a wavelength of 1.06 µm and is thus in the near-infrared. As such, it can be transmitted easily down a flexible fibreoptic delivery system and delivered to many more anatomical sites than the CO2 laser. The emergent radiation has lost its collimation and will diverge quite rapidly. Most fibres have a coaxial flow of gas, usually CO2, to keep debris away from the end of the fibre. This is particularly necessary where contamination with blood or blood products may make continuous operation difficult.

As with the CO2 laser, 1.06 µm Nd:YAG radiation is invisible. An HeNe laser (or other light source) needs to be incorporated into the device as an aiming beam. This is also a very useful safety feature as near-infrared radiation can cause irreparable damage to the retina. The Nd:YAG laser is easy to operate as a Q-switched laser. An optoelectronic switch is incorporated inside the laser cavity and the lasing action is prevented for a large percentage of the time. The photon energy therefore builds up to an even higher level than normal, and when the switch is eventually opened, a massive pulse of energy is delivered. The switch can then be closed and the process repeated. This type of action has found a use in ophthalmology where, by focusing the pulse to a very small spot, electromechanical breakdown of tissue can be induced with minimal surrounding damage.

The Nd:YAG laser has a greater depth of penetration and is more suited to hysteroscopic surgery (Sutton 1993). Hysteroscopic procedures include removal of fibroids and polyps, transsection of uterine septae, lysis of adhesions and endometrial ablation.

Other laser systems

Many other laser systems are used in medicine and the time period from research to common usage seems to be getting shorter. It is neither possible nor desirable to give a complete list, but some of the following examples have potential benefits for gynaecological surgery.

Photodynamic therapy

Photodynamic therapy is a treatment for certain tumours (Spikes and Jori 1987). It relies upon selective retention in tumour tissues of a drug (photosensitizer), such as haematoporphyrin derivative, which only becomes active on exposure to light of a particular wavelength. This provides highly selective tissue necrosis. Each photosensitizer has a particular spectrum of action requiring light of the appropriate wavelength for maximum absorption and effect. Clinically used sensitizers work between 420 nm (blue) and 780 nm (deep red). Longer wavelengths penetrate deeper (blue 1–2 mm and red >5 mm). As there are many decay pathways available, the output is multi-wavelength, but a narrow wavelength range can be selected with suitable optical devices. The copper vapour and dye laser combination can produce over 5 W of red light at 630 mm, which is an absorption peak of haematoporphyrin derivative.

The other metal vapour device is the gold laser. The output of this is at 627.8 nm, a close match to the dye laser, without the added complication of two devices in series.

Ultraviolet lasers

Research into ultraviolet lasers has produced systems which seem to rely on non-thermal mechanisms for tissue destruction. These are the excimer lasers, a term derived from ‘excited dimmer’, where the active medium is made from a combination of two substances which do not normally combine, such as a rare gas and a halide. These lasers have found a place in ophthalmology, and their potential for precise tissue removal offers the microsurgeon a very powerful tool.

The early use of lasers in gynaecology was in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, but subsequently spread to most other areas of the lower reproductive tract. The use of the laser in treatment of intraepithelial neoplasia of the genital tract is described in Chapter 38. Similar diathermy techniques are described in the same chapter.

We are under pressure to decrease health costs, so alternative, less-expensive technology has reduced the use of laser technology in recent years. However, lasers are still used in various clinical settings in obstetric and gynaecological surgery. Some examples include intrauterine laser ablation of placental vessels for the treatment of twin–twin transfusion syndrome (Robyr et al 2005), and ovarian drilling for ovulation induction in patients with anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome (Farquhar et al 2007). Other uses are being investigated, but the evidence on safety and efficacy outcomes thus far is insufficient to support use in a non-research environment. Examples of these include laparoscopic laser myomectomy and percutaneous laser therapy for fetal tumours. There are also controversial areas regarding the use of lasers which have entered commercial gynaecology without much regulation or scientific evaluation, such as laser vaginal rejuvenation.

Laser safety

All laser systems in current use have no way of distinguishing between patient and operator. The desired effect on a patient can be a serious accident to the surgeon. The subject of the safe construction and operation of lasers in medicine and surgery is thus very important and must be understood by all involved. This section is biased in favour of UK regulations, but the situation is similar in most European countries and the USA, although, of course, regulatory bodies and documents will have different guises.

All lasers sold in the UK must conform to three basic standards. Electrical safety requirements are detailed in BS EN 60601-1-1 (British Standards Institution 2001) and non-ionizing radiation hazards are covered by BS EN 60825-1 and BS EN 60601-2-22 (British Standards Institution 1996, 2007). A further publication by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (2008) outlines good laser practice together with some additional equipment safety features. All these publications should be considered by a laser protection adviser (a health authority or trust appointee) who will assist each user in specifying and installing lasers in clinical surroundings. Although the requirements will vary from laser to laser and from site to site, the following sections outline the major considerations involved.

Control of hazards

Lasers are currently classified into four groups from Class 1 to 4, with Class 1 being the least hazardous and Class 4 being the most hazardous. Class 3 is also subdivided into two classes, 3A and 3B. It is the manufacturers’ responsibility to classify a laser, but, once this is done, it will rarely be changed. Stringent safety precautions must be introduced when Class 3 and 4 lasers are in use. Most medical lasers are Class 3B or 4 and do need such safeguards. Aiming beams are usually Class 1 or 2 and present a minimal hazard.

In addition to classifying the laser, manufacturers must ensure that the equipment complies with the specification for its particular class. Generally all systems will have a key control and some way of monitoring the power being delivered to the patient. It should also indicate, either visually or audibly, when the laser shutter is opened and the maximum permitted exposure is exceeded.

Administrative controls are framed to ensure that the equipment is then used safely. A set of local rules must be drawn up which specify who is allowed to use a laser and where it can be used. A laser controlled area must be defined and the activities within that area must be controlled. There must be no possibility of radiation in excess of the maximum permitted exposure level passing out of the area, even if this means blocking windows and doors. Warning signs must be exhibited at the entrance to the laser controlled area, and door interlocks can be used but are not obligatory. Examples of such local rules can be found in other texts (Stamp 1983, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency 2008).

All personnel within the laser controlled area must either be protected from the radiation by the inherent optical properties of the operating equipment or must wear appropriate spectacles. For example, any common translucent glass is impervious to CO2 laser radiation. Precautions for the Nd:YAG laser are more complicated, and special eyewear for observers and filters to protect the operator from back-reflection through a delivery system are required. Obviously such devices cannot be used when the aiming beam is derived from the therapeutic beam. In this case, an additional safety shutter is required to protect the surgeon during treatment. Precautions against eye damage must be rigorously implemented for all present, including the patient.

Fire is an ever-present hazard with the use of Class 4 lasers and simple precautions must be observed. Aqueous instead of spirit-based solutions should be used and paper drapes should be avoided. CO2 radiation is readily absorbed by water, and by keeping swabs soaked in water or saline, tissues adjacent to the operation site can be protected. A suitable fire extinguisher should always be available. Greater care must be exercised in the presence of inflammable anaesthetic gases. Endotracheal tubes have been ignited by a laser with serious results (Bandle and Holyoak 1987). While this situation is not likely to be encountered in gynaecology, inflammable gases may be passed rectally by the patient during laser treatment of the lower genital tract, posing a theoretical risk of explosion.

A by-product of laser treatment (and diathermy to a certain extent) is a plume of smoke and debris, with a characteristic odour. This must be evacuated and collected from as near as possible to the impact zone for two important reasons. First, the emission of smoke is likely to obscure the operating site. This is particularly true in cervical or vaginal surgery. Second, doubts have been raised over the viability of particles contained within the plume (Garden et al 1988). Although the evidence is not overwhelming, it is essential that the smoke should be adequately extracted and filtered.

Unintentional reflections of the laser beam striking an instrument can be dangerous. Although it is very unlikely that radiation reflected in this way will be sufficiently focused to cause damage, it is sensible to ensure that the instruments are not highly polished and scatter any incident radiation. It should not be assumed that the reflecting qualities of a surface are the same at visible and far-infrared wavelengths, so care should be exercised in the choice of speculae and other operating instruments.

References

Bandle AM, Holyoak B. Laser incidents. In: Mosely H, Haywood JK, editors. Medical Laser Safety. London: Institute of Physical Sciences in Medicine; 1987:47-57.

Boulnois J. Photophysical processes in recent medical laser developments: a review. Lasers in Medical Science. 1986;1:47-66.

British Standards Institution. Medical Electrical Equipment. Particular Requirements for Safety. Specification for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Laser Equipment. BS EN 60601-2-22. London: BSI; 1996.

British Standards Institution. Medical Electrical Equipment. Collateral Standard. Safety Requirements for Medical Electrical Systems. BS EN 60601-1-1. London: BSI; 2001.

British Standards Institution. Safety of Laser Products. Equipment Classification and Requirements. BS EN 60825-60821. London: BSI; 2007.

Carruth JAS, McKenzie AL. Medical Lasers, Science and Clinical Practice. Bristol: Adam Hilger; 1986.

d’Arsonval MA. Production de courants de haute frequence et de grande intensite: leurs effects physiologiques. Comptes Rendus Societe de Biologie. 1893;9:122-124.

Duffy S, Reid PC, Smith JHF, Sharp F. In vitro studies of uterine electrosurgery. Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1991;78:213-220.

Farquhar C, Lilford RJ, Marjoribanks J, Vandekerckhove P 2007 Laparoscopic ‘drilling’ by diathermy or laser for ovulation induction in anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 18: CD001122.

Garden JM, O’Banion MK, Shelnitz LS, et al. Papillomavirus in the vapour of carbon dioxide laser treated verrucae. JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association. 1988;259:1199-1202.

Maiman TH. Stimulated optical radiation in the ruby. Nature. 1960;187:493-494.

Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency 2008 Guidance on the Safe Use of Lasers, IPL Systems and LEDs. MRHA, London.

Mester E, Ludany G, Vajda J, et al. Uber die Wirkung von Laser-Strahlen auf die Bakteriemphagozytose der Leukozyten. Acta Biologica et Medica Germanica. 1968;21:317-321.

Minton JP, Carlton DM, Dearman JR, et al. An evaluation of the physical response of malignant tumour implants to pulsed laser radiation. Surgery, Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 1965;121:538-544.

Phipps JH, Lewis BV, Roberts T, et al. Treatment of functional menorrhagia by radiofrequency-induced thermal endometrial ablation. The Lancet. 1990;335:374-376.

Robyr R, Quarello E, Ville Y. Management of fetofetal transfusion syndrome. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2005;25:795.

Spikes JD, Jori G. Photodynamic therapy of tumours and other diseases using porphyrins. Lasers in Medical Science. 1987;2:3-15.

Stamp JM. An introduction to medical lasers. Clinical Physics and Physiological Measurement. 1983;4:267-290.

Sutton C. Lasers in infertility. Human Reproduction. 1993;8:133-146.

Wall BF, Harrison RM, Spiers FN. Patient Dosimetry Techniques in Diagnostic Radiology. York: Institute of Physical Sciences in Medicine; 1988.