DELIRIUM

Published on 10/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurology

Last modified 10/04/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1507 times

CHAPTER 11 DELIRIUM

Delirium may be caused by specific brain injury (e.g., herpes simplex encephalitis), but more often, delirium is a nonspecific response of the brain to challenges from systemic illness or medications. Delirium can occur in otherwise normal brains with extreme physiological challenge (e.g., intensive care admission), but in diseased brains (e.g., Alzheimer’s dementia), even apparently trivial challenges, such as a urinary tract infection or constipation, may trigger delirium. Delirium may be caused by just one factor (e.g., recreational drug use) but commonly appears to result from a combination of harmful factors.

In most cases, delirium is easy to recognize once it is considered and an adequate history has been obtained. Although a diagnostic workup—and therapy, if indicated—for specific brain injury is always important, this situation is rare. More commonly, multiple possible etiological factors are identified, and attention needs to be directed to each of these. Masterful delirium management seldom requires a single clever diagnosis; more commonly, management requires insightful clinical practice that can detect multiple potential contributors and ameliorate each of these. A collaborative team approach is the key to success. Truly outstanding clinicians manage this well, through attention to systems issues aimed at the prevention and optimal management of delirium.

Delirium is common and is associated with a higher risk of death, persistent cognitive impairment, institutionalization, and prolonged hospitalization. There is some evidence that prevention of delirium is often possible, but prevention strategies remain underused. Because delirium treatments have limited efficacy, and because neuropathological insights are of limited clinical relevance, the emphasis of any discussion of delirium must be on prevention.

EPIDEMIOLOGY

Prevalence and Incidence

Delirium is common (Table 11-1). The prevalence of delirium in hospitalized older patients is 14% to 60%; the rates are higher in surgical patients (particularly those with hip fracture or requiring emergency surgery).26 Approximately 1 per 10 elderly patients presenting to hospital are delirious, and a further 10% to 40% develop delirium while hospitalized.7 Delirium occurs in up to 45% of hospitalized patients with preexisting cognitive impairment.8 Delirium is even more common in patients nearing the end of life, occurring in up to four fifths of such patients.9,10 Delirium occurs in 10% of patients presenting to emergency departments and is almost universal in intensive care units.1116 Of patients admitted to post–acute care facilities, 16% have a diagnosis of delirium, and a further 23% to 53% have symptoms of delirium at the time of admission.17,18

Despite the high incidence and prevalence of delirium, it remains underrecognized by clinicians—up to 90% of cases in inpatients are missed.13,1926 Furthermore, patients are discharged home from the emergency department without delirium being recognized, and this has been linked to increased mortality.12,13,23

Clinical Syndromes

Delirium is not a homogenous disorder; rather, it is a complex clinical syndrome with diverse etiologies and presentations. Delirium tremens is the classic picture of delirium with which most clinicians are familiar. Agitation; being out of touch with reality, with visual, tactile, and auditory hallucinations; obvious fear; and suspicion and mistrust of others typify the hyperactive form of delirium. The hypoactive form of delirium is recognized from apathy in patients with marked cognitive impairment. Hypoactive delirium is easily missed, inasmuch as there are no behavioral disturbances that bring attention to the patients and the patients seldom volunteer that they are experiencing psychotic thoughts or bizarre sensations.

About 25% of cases of delirium are of the hyperactive form, another 25% are of the hypoactive form, and the remainder of patients with delirium have both hyperactive and hypoactive features.3,27,28 The cause of delirium cannot be reliably diagnosed from the subtype observed, although drug withdrawal states more commonly manifest with the hyperactive form and metabolic encephalopathies with the hypoactive form.28,29 Infection may manifest with either form of delirium.30,31

Patients who have some of the key features of delirium but do not fully satisfy the DSM-IV criteria experience adverse events similar to those who do meet the criteria. This “subsyndromal delirium” has been associated with poor outcomes, and there is probably a relationship between the number of features present and the risk of adverse outcomes.32,33

Course

Delirium often lasts for a few days or a week, but some patients experience prolonged delirium. One study showed that only approximately one fifth of patients have complete resolution of delirium at 6 months.34 Symptoms of memory impairment, inattention, and disorientation may still be present 12 months after an episode of delirium.35 Prolonged delirium leads to diagnostic difficulty, especially when the precipitating event has apparently resolved, and it may be difficult to distinguish delirium from dementia. Dementia with Lewy bodies, with its characteristic attentional fluctuations causes particular difficulty (see Chapter 71). Nearly one in five patients has a new diagnosis of dementia in the year after an episode of delirium.36 The existence of prolonged delirium also makes it difficult to predict recovery of individual patients and complicates decisions about rehabilitation potential and long-term care.

RISK FACTORS

Baseline Vulnerability

Factors that increase vulnerability to delirium include preexisting cognitive impairment, comorbid illness, and sensory deficits (Table 11-2).11,45,47,48

TABLE 11-2 Baseline Vulnerability and Precipitating Factors for Delirium

Risk Factor* Adjusted Relative Risk
Cognitive impairment/dementia11,45,47,48 2.1-5.3
Number of major diagnostic categories45 1.7
Depression11,45 1.9-3.2
Alcoholism11,45 3.3-5.7
Severe medical illness11,58 3.5-5.9
Male gender11 1.9
Abnormal sodium11,47 2.2-6.2
Hearing impairment11 1.9
Visual impairment11,48 1.7-3.5
Diminished ADL11 2.5
Fever or hypothermia47 5.0
Psychoactive drug use47 3.9
Azotemia/dehydration47 2.0-2.9
Use of physical restraints52 4.4
Malnutrition52 4.0
More than three medications added in 24 hours52 2.9
Use of indwelling urinary catheter52 2.4
Any iatrogenic event52 1.9

ADL, activities of daily living.

* References cited as superscripts.

A delirium risk prediction model based on the presence or absence of cognitive impairment, severe illness, visual impairment, and dehydration at the time of admission to hospital shows that when one or two risk factors are present, the rate of incident delirium is 16% to 23%, whereas when three or four risk factors are present, the rate of delirium is 32% to 83%.48 The magnitude of the noxious event or events necessary to produce a delirious episode is inversely proportional to the degree of baseline vulnerability. In vulnerable people, delirium acts as a sensitive, but not specific, indicator of illness.

Precipitating Factors

The study of precipitating factors is plagued by confounding variables. The confounding variables (in this case, putative risk factors for delirium, such as prescription of new medications or insertion of a urinary catheter) are related to both the study factor (sickness that necessitates hospitalization and in turn may necessitate the new medications or catheterization) and the outcome factor (delirium that may be caused by the sickness, the interventions, or both). Confounding cannot be adjusted for statistically. Because it would be unethical to subject healthy people to medications, procedures, or hospitalization to test these as independent risk factors for delirium, the evidence regarding precipitating factors comes from descriptive studies. Nonetheless, the weight of evidence shows that many events may precipitate delirium. Delirium is a syndrome with multifactorial etiologies; therefore, in any one patient, it is usual for a number of factors to contribute to delirium.4951 Five independent risk factors associated with the hospitalization process that appear to increase the risk of developing delirium are (1) the addition of more than three medications in any 24-hour period, (2) the use of physical restraints, (3) the presence of malnutrition, (4) the insertion of an indwelling urinary catheter, and (5) any iatrogenic adverse event.52 The risk of delirium rises proportionately with the number of risk factors. Of importance is that these precipitating factors are potentially avoidable. Patients with three or more precipitating factors have an 8% per day risk of developing delirium.52 Other environmental factors, such as frequent room changes, absence of a clock, or absence of reading glasses, are associated with increased “severity” of delirium.53 Figure 11-2A depicts a hospital environment likely to produce delirium, whereas Figure 11-2C depicts a hospital environment likely to decrease the risk of delirium.

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

It is not surprising, in view of the myriad of etiologies and manifestations of delirium, that there is no one satisfactory unifying pathophysiological explanation. In addition, the neural mechanisms by which delirium is produced are poorly understood. To date, proposed pathophysiological mechanisms remain excessively simplistic or, when detailed, cannot explain adequately the various manifestations of delirium. It is not clear whether delirium is the final common pathway for a broad range of insults or whether the different causes of delirium have different pathophysiological processes that are clinically indistinguishable. Delirium is believed to occur as a result of perturbation to systems that have little reserve, and this fits well with the clinical risk prediction tools.

A number of neurotransmitter systems have been implicated in the pathophysiology of delirium. Abnormalities of the cholinergic system are the best studied. The notion that a central cholinergic deficiency leads to delirium is supported clinically by the observation that anticholinergic medications are potent causes of delirium.54,55 Investigators measuring serum anticholinergic activity have reported increased levels associated with the presence of delirium, with levels falling after resolution of delirium.56 Physostigmine, a reversible anticholinesterase inhibitor, has been used to treat anticholinergic delirium with some success.57 Cholinesterase inhibitors have been proposed as a means of treating delirium, with some case reports of success, but, conversely, tacrine has been reported to cause delirium.58,59 Excess dopamine has been implicated in the pathogenesis of delirium, and dopamine antagonists are used to treat delirium.60,61 Both serotonin excess and deficiency have been implicated; serotonin excess appears more likely to be associated with medication-related delirium.55 There is no conclusive evidence to relate either dopamine or γ-amino butyric acid to medical or surgical delirium, but perturbation of its activity has been linked with hepatic encephalopathy and benzodiazepine intoxication or withdrawal states.62,63 Hypercortisolism, such as that occurring in Cushing’s syndrome, is known to have effects on cognition, as well as on mood and sleep, but no decisive link with delirium has been established.55 Animal models such as stressed rats show changes in steroid sensitive hypothalamic neurones that can be prevented by adrenalectomy.64