Cosmeceuticals: Function and the Skin Barrier

Published on 15/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Dermatology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 5276 times

Chapter 2 Cosmeceuticals: Function and the Skin Barrier

THE STRATUM CORNEUM BARRIER AND THE ENVIRONMENT

Although the stratum corneum is an excellent and resilient barrier, the superficial layers are readily disturbed by low humidity, wind, sun, detergents, solvents, and other chemicals. The result is dry skin. What we experience as dry skin is not simply skin that lacks water but dysfunctional skin where aberrant desquamation leads to an accumulation of corneocytes at the skin surface (Fig. 2.3). The skin feels rough; looks dull because light is scattered by the uneven surface; looks pale because the pinky glow from the microcirculation is obscured; may show visible scaling, and is susceptible to irritation. All this is a consequence of dehydration at the skin surface.

Water is also important for maintaining the elasticity of the stratum corneum. Without water the skin feels tight and may crack in regions subject to stretching forces (e.g. knuckles). Ultraviolet (UV) radiation, which we mostly associate with sunburn in the short term and photoaging over time, may also damage the stratum corneum by disrupting the conversion of filaggrin to NMF (natural moisturizing factor).

THE BARRIER IS A CHALLENGE FOR COSMECEUTICALS

Normal skin is seldom entirely normal because of a daily battery of environmental insults. Minor defects accumulate over time and eventually produce a noticeable deterioration of skin function and appearance. Cosmeceutical products seeking to address these issues must somehow penetrate the stratum corneum barrier.

A route through the corneocytes at their points of intercellular connections (the desmosomes) is the most direct way across the stratum corneum barrier but the corneocyte outer membrane, the cornified envelope, is so extensively cross-linked and insoluble that very few substances are able to penetrate. The main route of penetration of the stratum corneum is a tortuous path through the multiple bilayer lipid matrix between the corneocytes (Fig. 2.5). The lipid bilayers create a formidable barrier to water, microorganisms, and many chemical types.

There has been extensive research to find methods to enhance delivery of actives through the stratum corneum. The main methods are summarized in Table 2.2. None of these methods is uniformly effective. Chemical penetration enhancers function by temporarily disrupting the lipid bilayer structures of the stratum corneum to allow easier passage of active molecules. The more effective chemical enhancers tend to cause irritation and some are toxic—these are not used in cosmeceuticals. SCOPE is a high-throughput screening system to identify Synergistic Combinations of Penetration Enhancers.

Table 2.2 Strategies to enhance skin penetration

Penetration enhancer Effectiveness comment
Chemicals Variable effect; often irritating
Liposomes Overclaimed (see text); mostly ineffective
Occlusive patches Effective; practical limitations
Iontophoresis Effective; requires charged molecules
Sonophoresis Limited evidence; safety to consider
Thermal poration Limited evidence; safety limitations
Massage Limited effect; transfollicular
Microneedle arrays Effective; invasive

Liposomes are widely used in cosmeceuticals. They are spherical vesicles bounded by a bilayer membrane formed from phospholipid or other polar lipids. This may be a single bilayer (unilamellar) or many layers (multilamellar). The multilamellar membranes are similar in structure to the stratum corneum lipid bilayers but generally less complex (Fig. 2.6). They are claimed to enhance penetration by carrying their hydrophilic contents through the lipid barrier layers as intact vesicles but their effectiveness as penetration enhancers is controversial. It seems likely that most effects of liposomes are due to disruption of the skin lipid bilayers and not to penetration of intact vesicles.

The challenge to deliver actives beyond the stratum corneum barrier has stimulated renewed interest in physical methods of penetration enhancement such as iontophoresis, sonophoresis, and thermal poration. These methods disturb the normal microstructure of the stratum corneum and create transient microscopic aqueous channels that allow increased penetration of ingredients. The treatment conditions must be controlled to avoid excessive damage, burning, and irritation.

While the focus of this chapter is the stratum corneum barrier, there is increasing interest in transfollicular delivery. Because hair follicles occupy less than 0.1% of the skin surface they have been discounted as a significant route for delivery. This may be true for cosmetically uninteresting sites like the forearm but for sites like the forehead the transfollicular route may be important. Transfollicular penetration depends on the state of the hair follicle which can be open or closed (closed pores are opened by massage).

NANOPARTICLES

Nanoparticles are microscopic particles with one dimension less than 100 nm (Table 2.3). Nanoparticles are not new but the possibility to use submicron size as a strategy to achieve hitherto difficult technical goals has spawned nanotechnology as a new field in medicine and cosmetology. It is no panacea. There are concerns that small particles entering the body may be a hazard to health. Nanoparticles are being promoted for cosmetic applications but optimism that they will overcome the skin barrier to penetration may turn out to be premature. Submicron liposomes penetrate human skin deeper and more rapidly than solid particles the same size that barely penetrate, indicating that permeability is determined by chemistry more than size. Nanoparticles greater than 5 nm do not penetrate the lipid layers of the stratum corneum but can enter the openings of the hair follicle.

Table 2.3 Nanoparticles in perspective

Description Size nm (10−9 m) Size microns (10−6 m)
Angstrom unit 0.1 0.00001
Length of C–C bond 0.154 0.000154
Stratum corneum hydrophilic pathways 0.4 0.0004
Carbon nanotube diameter 3 0.003
Cell membrane 6–10 0.006–0.01
Stratum corneum lipid bilayer 13 0.013
TiO2 in sunscreens 10–100 0.01–0.1
Rhino(cold) virus 20–30 0.02
Stratum corneum intercorneocyte space 20–75 0.025–0.075
ZnO in sunscreens 30–200 0.03–0.2
Flu virus 80–120 0.1
Upper limit nanoparticles 100 0.1
Staphylococcus 700 0.7
Escherichia coli 2000 2
Human sperm head 5000 5
Red blood cell 8000 8
Stratum corneum thickness 10–40 000 10–40
Human hair diameter 80 000 80
Head of pin 2 000 000 2000

FURTHER READING

Barry BW. Breaching the skin’s barrier to drugs. Nature Biotechnology. 2004;22:165–167.

Chan CK 2005 Percutaneous penetration enhancers: an update. Proceedings of the 9th Biennial International Conference of Perspectives in Percutaneous Penetration, La Grand Motte, France, April 13, 2004

Chandrasekhar NS, Rani S. Current status and future prospects in transdermal drug delivery. Available http://www.centerwatch.com/pharminfo.net, 2006.

Coderch L, De Pera M, Fonollosa J, De La Maza A, Parra J. Efficacy of stratum corneum lipid supplementation on human skin. Contact Dermatitis. 2002;47:139–146.

Current Stratum Corneum Research. Optimizing barrier function through fundamental skin care. Dermatological Therapy. 2004;17:1-68. [A full issue of the journal (9 papers) dedicated to the biology of the stratum corneum barrier and the impact of cleansing and moisturizing products]

Elias PM, Tsai J, Menon GK, Holleran WM, Feingold KR. The potential of metabolic interventions to enhance transdermal drug delivery. Journal of Investigative Dermatology Symposium Proceedings. 2002;7:79–85.

Forster T, editor. Cosmetic lipids and the skin barrier. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2002.

Gooris GS, Bouwstra JA. Infrared spectroscopic study of stratum corneum model membranes prepared from human ceramides, cholesterol and fatty acids. Biophysical Journal. 2007;92:2785–2795.

Kandlikar M, Ramachandran G, Maynard A, Murdock B. Health risk assessment for nanoparticles: a case for using expert judgment. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2007;9:137–156.

Kanikkannan N, Kandimalla K, Lamba SS, Singh M. Structure–activity relationship of chemical penetration enhancers in transdermal drug delivery. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2000;7:593–608.

Karande P, Jain A, Ergun K, et al. Design principles of chemical penetration enhancers for transdermal drug delivery. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2005;102:4688–4693.

Karande P, Jain A, Mitragotri S. Discovery of transdermal penetration enhancers by high-throughput screening. Nature Biotechnology. 2004;22:192–197.

Lademann J, Richter H, Teichmann A, et al. Nanoparticles: an efficient carrier for drug delivery into the hair follicles. European Journal of Pharmaceuticals and Biopharmaceutics. 2007;66:159–164.

Leyden JJ, Rawlings AV, editors. Skin moisturization. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2002.

McAllister DV, Allen MG, Prausnitz MR. Microfabricated microneedles for gene and drug delivery. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 2000;2:289–313.

Morgan CJ, Renwick AG, Friedmann PS. The role of stratum corneum and dermal microvascular perfusion in penetration and tissue levels of water-soluble drugs investigated by microdialysis. British Journal of Dermatology. 2003;148:434-443.

Tamarkin D. Using iontophoresis to enhance cosmetics delivery. Cosmetics and Toiletries. 2004;119:63–74.

Teichmann A, Ossadnik M, Richter H, Sterry W, Lademann J. Semiquantitative determination of the penetration of a fluorescent hydrogel formulation into the hair follicle with and without follicular closure by microparticles by means of differential stripping. Skin Pharmacology and Physiology. 2006;19:101–105.

Wiechers JW, Kelly CL, Blease TG, Dederen JC. Formulating for efficacy. International Journal of Cosmetic Science. 2004;26:173–182.