Cosmeceutical Botanicals: Part 2

Published on 15/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Dermatology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1707 times

Chapter 12 Cosmeceutical Botanicals: Part 2

INTRODUCTION

The explosive growth of the cosmeceutical industry has resulted in the introduction of many new ‘active’ ingredients. Most are derived from nature for unique marketing stories and to reduce the risk of federal oversight. About 100 different ingredients derived from plant sources are being incorporated into cosmeceutical and skin care products. It behooves all physicians and skincare providers recommending cosmeceuticals to have a working knowledge of botanicals so the best recommendations can be made to patients and clients.

Botanicals used for medicinals, flavorings, or fragrances are known as herbs. These are the historic foundation of pharmacologic medicine. An understanding of the significant science underlying the function of the botanical base is usually lacking. Specific issues include:

The methods of topical application of botanicals include: (1) water-based cream and lotion; (2) oil- and wax-based ointment; (3) powder and paste; (4) poultice of freshly cut herb; (5) fomentation or compress of warmed moistened herb; and (6) juice, tea, tincture, elixir, decoction, and infusion.

In the United States, botanical remedies are considered dietary supplements of food additives by federal regulators so there are no standards for potency of the components and efficacy of the products. In 2003, the Food and Drug Administration removed Ma huang (Ephedra sinica) from the market due to 155 deaths. Thirteen additional herbs including St John’s wort, gingko, ginseng, birthwort, arnica, cayenne, comfrey, henna, kava kava, mistletoe, rue, senna and yohimbine have induced fatalities. Severe mucocutaneous reactions induced by herbal formulations include anaphylaxis angioedema/urticaria, exfoliative erythroderma, linear IgA bullous dermatosis, lupus erythematosus, malignancies, pemphigus, Stevens–Johnson syndrome, Sweet’s syndrome, ulcerative stomatitis, and vasculitis.

The German Commission E regulates botanical products based on usage, clinical efficacy, and the quality of this evidence. It developed standardization of botanical products and now is the standard throughout the developed world. The US equivalent—PhytoPharm U.S. Institute of Phytopharmaceuticals—also evaluates clinical evidence and adverse reactions to identify ‘reasonable uses’ for hundreds of herbs. This information is very important with botanicals because the time of harvest, growing conditions, processing of the herb and ingredient mixes can substantially alter solubility, stability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacologic activity, and toxicity of the finished product.

These multiple variables indicate the need for certain efficacy and safety data. Quality healthcare demands evidence-based decisions. Only finished products tested in controlled double-blind clinical trials compared to placebo or a positive control of a prescription product and conducted by independent researchers using a statistically significant number of panelists is acceptable evidence based effectiveness.

A basic safety study of contact irritation and sensitization with a topical application of 50 or more patients should be a routine safety study for herbal products because these are far the most common adverse reactions. These studies also demonstrate to patients, clients, and media that healthcare providers of skin treatments and products put quality of care ahead of profits made from products based on dubious science and poor, if any, credible data.

Herbs with mucocutaneous therapeutic indications as determined by Commission E and PhytoPharm are listed in Table 12.1. The first group of herbs discussed below consists of most of the top 12 largest selling herbs in the US based on dollar volume. Of all the herbs listed with mucocutaneous applications, only 27 have been supported by reliable double-blind or open label clinical trials as listed in Table 12.2. The second group consists of most of the 21 herbs formulated into products tested in blinded clinical trials for treatment of photoaging as listed in Table 12.3.

Table 12.2 Herbs with clinical trials for treatment of mucocutaneous diseases/conditions

Table 12.3 Herbs with clinical trials for photoaging therapy

LARGEST SELLING HERBS

• Lavender (Fig. 12.5)

Lavandula angustifolia aromatic essential oil contains 70% linalool and linoyl acetate in the volatile phase and 13% tannins. Hydroxycoumarin and caffeic acid are non volatile actives. This herb has anti-inflammatory, anti-mutagenic, and antimicrobial, and mast cells inhibition activities. It is cytotoxic to fibroblasts if the concentration exceeds 0.25%.

Lavender oil is therapeutic for insect bites, burns, wounds, lacerations, acne, psoriasis, herpes, and fungal infections. A double-blinded clinical trial treating alopecia areata with a mixture of five other botanical oils produced a significant improvement in hair regrowth after 7 months (Tables 12.1, 12.2). In a 40-panelist open clinical trial using lavender in an aromatherapy bath, anger/frustration levels were significantly reduced.

One 4-year-old and three young teenage boys were treated with 100% lavender oil or lavender/tea tree oil shampoo, respectively. All four boys developed reversible gynecomastia after about a year of using these products daily. Lavender concentration exceeding 15% produces estrogenic effects due to the potency of its phytoestrogens. Tea tree oil over an 8% concentration damages stratum corneum barrier integrity. Thus, due to the surface to volume ratio effects, children and anyone with a compromised barrier such as an atopic must be cautious using products with lavender concentrations exceeding 5% for prolonged periods.

HERBS IN PHOTOAGING CLINICAL TRIALS

There is a paucity of human clinical trials using topically applied herbal formulations to treat photoaging. Twenty herbal ingredients have been used in these studies (Table 12.3). Only seven were solitary actives in double-blind trials including green tea, soy (total), date palm, licorice, oat, tamarind and coffeeberry.

FURTHER READING

Ahmad MS, Pischetsrieder M, Ahmed N. Aged garlic extract and S-allyl cysteine prevent formation of advanced glycation endproducts. European Journal of Pharmacology. 2007;561:32–38.

Auerbach PS. Wilderness medicine, 4th edn., St Louis: Mosby; 2001:411. 1133, 1170, 1176, 1177

Baumann LS. Cosmeceutical critique: tea tree oil. Skin and Allergy News. 2002 November:14.

Baumann LS. Cosmeceutical critique: chamomile. Skin and Allergy News. 2003 July:43.

Baumann LS. Cosmeceutical critique: lavender. Skin and Allergy News. 2003 September:33.

Baumann LS. Cosmeceutical critique: grape seed extract. Skin and Allergy News. 2003 November:26.

Baumann LS. Cosmeceutical critique: pomegranate. Skin and Allergy News. 2004 January:42.

Baumann LS. Cosmeceutical critique: ginseng. Skin and Allergy News. 2006 October:18.

Bauza E, Dal Farra C, Berghi A, Oberto G, Peyronel D, Domloge N. Date palm kernel extract exhibits antiaging properties and significantly reduces wrinkles. International Journal of Tissue Reactions. 2002;24:131–136.

Bedi MK, Shenefelt PD. Herbal therapy in dermatology. Archives of Dermatology. 2002;138:232–242.

Blake J 2002 Tea for you. Life section. In: The Idaho Statesman February 22:1

Dehghani F, Merat A, Panjehshahin MR, Handjani F. Healing effects of garlic extracts on warts and corns. International Journal of Dermatology. 2005;44:612–615.

Hsu S. Green tea linked to skin cell rejuvenation. ScienceDaily April 25. Online. Available: www.science-daily.com, 2003.

Jancin B. Novel antioxidant shows promise as photoaging topical. Skin and Allergy News April. 2007;1:34.

Jellin JM, Gregory P, Batz F, et al. Natural medicines comprehensive database, 8th edn., Stockton, CA: Therapeutic Research Facility; 2006:149-151. 165–170, 456–459, 558–561, 566–568, 580–590, 620, 621, 634–640, 793–794, 891–892, 1015–1017, 1115–1117, 1172–1179, 1219, 1220, 1336–1338

Kasai K, Yoshimura M, Koga T, Arii M, Kawasaki S. Effects of oral administration of ellagic acid-rich pomegranate extract on ultraviolet induced pigmentation in human skin. Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology. 2006;52:383–388.

LaGow B, editor. PDR for herbal medicines, 3rd edn. Montvale, NJ: Thomson PDR. 2004:93-97. 267–274, 285–288, 344–353, 354–359, 379–387, 400–404, 408–413, 592–593, 650, 651, 707–710, 767–786, 817–821, 875–876

Lee J, Jung E, Lee J, et al. Panax ginseng induces type I collagen synthesis through activation of small signaling. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2007;109:29–34.

Levin C, Maibach H. Exploration of ‘alternative’ and ‘natural’ drugs in dermatology. Archives of Dermatology. 2002;138:207–211.

Norman R, Nelson D. Do alternative and complementary therapies work for common dermatologic conditions? Skin and Aging. 2000;2:28–33.

Pajonk F, Riedisser A, Henke M, McBride WH, Fiebich B. The effects of tea extracts on proinflammatory signaling. BMC Med, 4. 2006:28-39. Online. Available: www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov.

Putnik K, Stadler P, Schäfer C, Koelbl O. Enhanced radiation sensitivity and radiation recall dermatitis (RRD) after hypericin therapy: case report and review of literature. Radiation Oncology. 2006;1:32–40.

Thornfeldt C. Science or spin. Healthy Aging. 2006;2:55–62.

Winston D, Dattner A. The American system of medicine. Clinics in Dermatology. 1999;17:53–55.

Yarnell E, Absacal K, Hooper CG. Clinical botanical medicine. Larchmont, NY: Mary Ann Liebert, 2002;223–242.